The best scenes are this one, the one where the book with the patriotic title is thrown away, and the final one where the fans mourn when John blows himself up. I think this is the best macaroni western movie ever made.
James Coburn and Rod Steiger reprising the chemistry that Clint Eastwood and Eli Wallach created in "The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly", under Sergio Leone's direction. And doing a great job of it.
I saw this movie twice, with two different titles. One was Fist full of Dynamite and the other Duck You Sucker, enjoyed it both times. Once was in USA and the other was in Australia.
It was also released in some European areas under the title Once Upon a Time...The Revolution as it was actually the third movie in the Once Upon a Time trilogy.
I'm 52 & saw this classic as a kid. Also, I'm Irish, so it means something more for me. I always found the Sean Sean piece of music so haunting & it stayed with me throughout my life
Loved this movie..corbin did alot of good movies but thus will allways be my fav...i guess the music was about him thinking of his love while fighting..
In the same period in Italy a similar war for reunion of Italy in 1860 was fought between northern and southern. Also from Ireland catholics men fight for pope and southern Italy. Read the book italian Revolution from o'Clary.
I was thinking the same thing about the horses and a bit concerned about broken legs or at least some injuries as they tumbled and rolled down that Hill I'm sure there were some injuries hopefully it was not too bad.
I love this movie I watched 6 times in one weekend in the 70’s when it came out even with the technical errors it was a great movie. Who knew they had MG 42’s in 1916?
This is a great scene from an awesome movie - I first saw it with my dad on the big screen when I was 10 or so. It made a hell of an impression on me, as it would at that age - still remember the huge ears on that army commander for some reason.
James Coburn was one of the most gentlemanly people anyone could meet. A couple of friends met him in a bar in a Montreal hotel many years ago. It was around 2am and the barman wanted to close the bar. James Coburn and my two friends were the only people left, then James Coburn walked over to my friends and asked them if they wanted another drink. Needless to say they did, so Coburn told the barman that he and his friends wanted more drinks. They sat and talked for more than an hour about everything and nothing, just like old friends. Next morning at breakfast James Coburn came over to their table and asked them if they were OK, thanked them for an enjoyable evening and told them to have a good day. A nice gentleman.
As far as I could tell- The Maxim? is water cooled, but it wasn't connected, it only fired one 250rd belt. The MG42 would of had its belts linked together, rate of fire about 1300rpm. I once watched an M60 go through 600rds in 90sec., it was dull red & still working fine (night shoot, I linked the belts up & timed him).
@@t_7692 You are most likely right... As we all know these Hollywood smegheads don't know anything about guns... It even got a few people killed on set over the years and even recently and it will land herr Baldwin in jail and in a shitload of financial difficulties...
@@vinsblack2 Aaahh, South Korea, the country that breaks World Trade Organisation Regulations ever day, just to keep fair competition out. My sympathies for you having to drive all the KIAs, the Hyundais, Daewoos and all the other crap.
A forward-looking film, the MG42 was used in the Mexican Civil War twenty years before it was developed. And totally cool how Rod Steiger leans against the hot-shot Maxim MG without getting burned. Leone at his best.
It's a 42 but rate of fire seemed a bit slow. Were they adjustable? The Maxim had no water feed to the cooling jacket & the hole in the end of the barrel didn't look 7.92 to me. After a 250rd belt yes it may have been a bit warm.
@@ron9320 MG42/G3 that gives it different firing rates, 900, 1,200 and 1,500 rounds per minute, which bolt gets put in one is up to the units commander and the doctrine that dictates the particular situation, ie defensive, offensive, ammo supply and barrel change out concerns for the situation. When I read that it made sense because I've noticed over the years that in war footage and even in the movies it seems like you'll see different firing rates from them going from fast to all out silly fast. I guess the different bolts have different weights and that's what changes the firing rate from one to the other.
@@jandoerlidoe3412 That explosion was big enough to get everyone. On, under and besides the bridge. Let it go, mop up the rest with bullets. But hey, great scene anyhow
Épinglez les morceaux de texteÉpinglez les morceaux de texte copiés pour qu'ils n'expirent pas après 1 heureÉpinglez les morceaux de texte copiés pour qu'ils n'expirent pas après 1 heure copiés pour qu'ils n'expirent pas après 1 heure
@@paulstellwag1215 est Année Filière Qu’est-ce is Filière in this area that h Image Filière and is the one Année Année universitaire Is Année universitaire You can have a great h Les Année en Yy You Année Année And In Filière your belly will Année Année Y Théorie générale Théorie générale Image 🖼 en Y Un H Année J'utilise is your favorite hair you hhhhh your favorite your favorite hhhhh yarn is theme and the that hhhhhhh hhhhhhh hhy
@@paulstellwag1215 6yhyy H hhhh you h Hhhhhy Hta hy and j'y Théorie pense Hh A yh You Hta yh H H H Mobile has been Years old H Years ago Years ago in Hh J'utilise hh Yh H Years hyhyhh You hh You hyhn hy Hhy H
Using machine gun fire to drive their victims under the bridge was a brilliant piece of script and film making. Instant death, no burial service required, party OVER.
A joy to see stunt horses in action : rear up , turn the head to the opposite side of impact , fall (actually, a roll) onto a shoulder , jump up , completely unharmed , ready for the next take . If you see a front end nose plant , the horse has been tripped . Laws against that . Music score was worth a giggle !
@@mikebronicki8264 I think the idea was to get them to bunch up behind the bridge so they could all be blown up. Otherwise, only a fraction of the troops would be on the bridge at any given time.
@@honzo1078 Yes. They were herding them down below the bridge as you can see who is left going down behind it right before they flash back to the hillside and he sets off the explosion.
I love the bit where Rod Steigers character (Juan Miranda) tries to shoot the machine gun and it's not working then it starts all off on it's own and he's like praying to God and not what he expected and he's trying to hold on to it like it's got a life of it's own! LOL! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Fun clip, but the last part leaves me SMH for a bunch of reasons. Hundreds of rounds and not one targeted at the tank? No counter-fire from the tank? Spend all that ammo and *then* blow the bridge (leaving the tank inconvenienced but still operational)? And while I've never fired an MG like that one, I'm not sure I'd want to lay fingers on the shroud after running a whole case through on full auto.
It is, althow the explosion of the bridge in 'the Good ,the bad and the ugly' is severe too...look at that scene when the piles almost hit Clint and Eli
Man I hate to be a naysayer but it doesn’t look that impressive to me. There have to be better real explosions, particularly with more fire like in Apocalypse Now or something...
If you mean the big fat barrel it's a water cooled Browning or Maxim MG, its full of water to cool the inner barrel. Should be warm but not hot enough to burn.
I think they wanted the cavalry to cluster in the valley behind the bridge before they blew it. The explosions would also daze the surviving enemy and prevent pursuit. Blowing it at the start would only take out part of the convoy. Although when the gun jammed he could’ve gone to plan B if he didn’t clear it when he did.
@@jonsmitt9769 - I think that it was part of the plan all the time; the best way to prevent the inevitable calvary pursuit is to bury all of them after killing a bunch of 'em.
What an interesting scene. The killing of hundreds of men, and beautiful music. 2 guys smiling at each other while they pump hundreds of bullets into the enemy.
@@Blei1986 you can see that not all of them could fit on the bridge on one time. the point of the mg fire is to funnel them under the bridge where they think they are safe, and just drop the bridge on all of them.
@@ethan20559 as i said, they all would have been killed/unable to fight if they blew up the bridge when it was filled with enemies. totally unlogic to first shoot MGs empty and THEN blow up the bridge, allowing the enemies in the rear to spread out to flee/take cover)
@@jhgeorg you mean MG34, 38 would have been MP38 (maschinenpistole/maschinengewehr). Movie was set in 1910's during Mexican revolutions. It's a movie, no one expects them to be factual, they're entertainment 🙂
@@makinbacongreasyagain968 it was a 42 without the stock. obviously wrong for the time but there were a few anomalies. I mean the ira weren't around till 1919 and this 1912. plus the pistol on the train is way wrong too. but no drama. best western ever. and score.
he used the MGs to force the remaining fleeing soldiers to hide under the bridge before he blow it up. maximizing his damage. MGs were just an distraction.
@@sweetpoison5341 Hence my comment..."& save the ammo for cleanup". They could both have been taken out by the cannon in the tank. But hey, it's just a cheap billy bang bang!
@@myredute first of all the convey is too long/massive to fit onto the bridge at once. if you blow it up at first, there would be a good portion of survivors left and MG would have a hard time killing them. if you blow up the "cover", it would just scatter the survivors all over. by shoot first, you will "corral" the survivors into what they thought was a good cover, and then blow up the "cover" in one go. Second, it's hard to pin point 2 very well covered MG over a distance even with modern equipment, you can watch what those ambush videos in Afghan war, it would be much harder for pre-ww2 equipment to be able to "take out" anything in those situation.
@@myredute but I do agree that this is just movie and it's far from reality. In reality, trained soldiers wouldn't just piled into ONE cover, they would spread out and find the nearest cover and return fire. MG at those distance wouldn't have that kind of accuracy either, especially with the way that they are firing (non-stop). One of them ( the guy with Maxim MG doesn't even seem to have been trained properly. They would be lucky if they can hit anything at all in reality.
The one mistake Sean makes is he didn't get the Colonel in the blast. Now the Colonel is a fairly ruthless indivdual before this scene but after... he will stop at nothing to get revenge on Sean and Juan. He'll burn villages, shoot hostages... every action has an equal and opposite reaction and the Colonel's reaction is going to be equally brutal. Imagine for a moment you were a soldier and something like this happened to your unit, the fury and the burning desire for revenge would be horrifying...
MG 42 would indeed be making some carnage, but sadly, it would be drawing massive amounts of fire. Great flick, like all he did. Fine actor, back in the day when it was a true craft.
Army Lesson #49: Don't waste 1,000's of rounds of ammo when the bridge is wired to blow. PS - Put the ear plugs in your ears before you start the attack.
They don't really have any kind of connection except the title (in some markets in which it was called Once Upon a Time.....the Revolution) it is a good movie though very underrated among Leone's works.
Its a great scene in part because at least the sheeting seems mildly realistic - unlike most films where ammo never runs out and is weightless, barrels never heat and need changing or cooling and shooting scenes are so close they could throw rocks at each other - the distances feel about right (good range but not so close they can easily see where you are, rally or flank). Guess the armoured car crew would be looking through a slot wouldn’t see well where its coming from in an old armoured car without some guy knocking on the lid to point and probably getting shot off. By then there’d be almost no one left on foot and you’d have blown the bridge and be moving to a new position to keep them down while you scoot. by the way thats not a Vickers, its a a ww2 german mg42 (an anachronism). Thats a far faster firing gun and doesn’t need two people except to schlep all the ammo. A second person would be a spotter to watch peripherals and would be needed to carry ammo (the gun is heavy enough but this thing can eat +1200 round per minute and at +10g per bullet a few 250 round cans of thats +25kg for less than 15 seconds of full firing) but the second person is not needed to reload. If this was realistic You’d want to be far quicker - hit them at each end of the convoy to drive them onto bridge, blow the bridge and move it to mop up or discourage pursuit or move to a second prepared place. If you stayed as long as he does they’d eventually spot and snipe you down when reloading (very vulnerable during the c 7seconds to reload a belt or change barrel) so he wants to be in a concealed position and to move fast unless he could get them all. Gunners didn’t live long in either Ww1 or 2 for those reasons.
I'll bet it's one of the biggest movie blasts ever filmed! The ground jumped for 500 feet around when it went off! Like the one in "the Good, the Bad and the Ugly" when they dynamited the bridge and a rock almost hit the camera!
@@coopersmill Yeah!!! Hollyweird huh!!! Ever seen inside the box? The rack of the plunger spins a pinion gear on the armature of a generator, like in a wood telephone, faster and faster, and at the bottom of the travel, 2 contacts come together and send a surge down the wire at the peak speed of the generator, to deliver the best voltage! AND........it takes a lot of force to operate it!!!
when i was a teen i wasn't shocked by such scenes, but now, as an adult... i don't know... these calibers... each bullet rips a head, explodes brain, eyes, tears guts, cuts people in half, and kill the horses, also. And these guys, they are sheep, sons taken from their mothers, to fight for something, someone they don't even know or really care. I would... i wouldn't like it. I would feel bad. And yet, so many movies depict killing as a good time. Surely, i would kill if i had to, but... in a situation like that... maybe i would do it, but i would break my teeth tightening my jaw. I would feel it in my Heart, i think.
This is one of my new favorite movies. The music, action, directing. All wonderful. I LOVE Sergio Leone and Ennio Morricone together!
The best scenes are this one, the one where the book with the patriotic title is thrown away, and the final one where the fans mourn when John blows himself up.
I think this is the best macaroni western movie ever made.
How beautiful does that pice of music tribute that beautiful explosion. Brilliant.
That bridge explosion was insanely violent. Bravo!
James Coburn and Rod Steiger reprising the chemistry that Clint Eastwood and Eli Wallach created in "The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly", under Sergio Leone's direction. And doing a great job of it.
Real actors, not Soy boys and boy chicks.
I can't believe Clint is like 91 and still going strong making great movies and staring in A lot of them!
@frank bennett I heard about that and it's unfortunate.
I saw this movie twice, with two different titles. One was Fist full of Dynamite and the other Duck You Sucker, enjoyed it both times. Once was in USA and the other was in Australia.
...waltzing Matilda...waltzing Matilda...you'll come a-waltzing Matilda with me...
It was also released in some European areas under the title Once Upon a Time...The Revolution as it was actually the third movie in the Once Upon a Time trilogy.
I'm 52 & saw this classic as a kid. Also, I'm Irish, so it means something more for me. I always found the Sean Sean piece of music so haunting & it stayed with me throughout my life
I saw this as a kid too! It was traumatizing and at the same time facinating in a way that always stuck to me.
Those movies had a way to evoke sadness with the music and lack of dialogue.
Loved this movie..corbin did alot of good movies but thus will allways be my fav...i guess the music was about him thinking of his love while fighting..
In the same period in Italy a similar war for reunion of Italy in 1860 was fought between northern and southern. Also from Ireland catholics men fight for pope and southern Italy. Read the book italian Revolution from o'Clary.
Hey, I’m 62 and every now and then I catch myself singing/humming “Sean Sean”
Wow. Great shooting. 100% human death and not a single horse shot. Amazing
Good aims.
THANK GOD I LOVE HORSES.
They didn't have horse bullets.
I was thinking the same thing about the horses and a bit concerned about broken legs or at least some injuries as they tumbled and rolled down that Hill I'm sure there were some injuries hopefully it was not too bad.
Thats the true meaning of "gun control"
the definition of practical effects here
I love this movie I watched 6 times in one weekend in the 70’s when it came out even with the technical errors it was a great movie. Who knew they had MG 42’s in 1916?
Maxim on the water cooled mg and the other one is MG34
@@joshuajoaquin5099 again, the mg34 wasn't built until 1934
@@coreymartin5185 yep, just pointing it out that its not MG42. But kinda odd seeing it
In fact, during this time, the barrel of the machine gun had to be changed twice. But this is a movie :)))
The barrel `housing of that "MG34" is the barrel `housing of an MG42.
This is a great scene from an awesome movie - I first saw it with my dad on the big screen when I was 10 or so.
It made a hell of an impression on me, as it would at that age - still remember the huge ears on that army commander for some reason.
What is the name of this movie?
@@hithamatef8641 Duck, You Sucker aka A Fistful of Dynamite by Sergio Leone.
Same here, saw it with my Dad when came it out in the early 70's. I remember him drinking the egg (the Commander)
Love how that one guy throws up an OK sign then casually rests his arm and hand on the barrel of the machine gun.
The best musical score of any film ever
James Coburn was one of the most gentlemanly people anyone could meet.
A couple of friends met him in a bar in a Montreal hotel many years ago. It was around 2am and the barman wanted to close the bar. James Coburn and my two friends were the only people left, then James Coburn walked over to my friends and asked them if they wanted another drink. Needless to say they did, so Coburn told the barman that he and his friends wanted more drinks. They sat and talked for more than an hour about everything and nothing, just like old friends.
Next morning at breakfast James Coburn came over to their table and asked them if they were OK, thanked them for an enjoyable evening and told them to have a good day. A nice gentleman.
Make someone work when they should be home with family? Doesn't sound like a gentleman to me.
That's a cool story.
Did you know he's on the cover of the Wings albums Band on The Run?
He's center in the picture.
I can't stand bitter people.@@0g.Ghost.7373
Fantastic story, thanks!
It’s awesome how machine guns never over heated back in the old days.
a bunch of anachronistic machine guns and guns in this movie
The one the bearded guy is shooting is a M1917 Browning machine gun its water cooled.
And never run out of ammo.
As far as I could tell-
The Maxim? is water cooled, but it wasn't connected, it only fired one 250rd belt. The MG42 would of had its belts linked together, rate of fire about 1300rpm.
I once watched an M60 go through 600rds in 90sec., it was dull red & still working fine (night shoot, I linked the belts up & timed him).
It must have been cool to be able to use an MG42 in 1910…
Don't confuse the issue with fact.
Its a mg34 i think.
@@aoe301 predecessor of the MG42 ?
@@aoe301 nope, the MG 34 has a round Barrelshroud and was developed in the 30th's. Even for the german MG 08/15 is 1910 five years to early. Cheers
@@t_7692 You are most likely right... As we all know these Hollywood smegheads don't know anything about guns... It even got a few people killed on set over the years and even recently and it will land herr Baldwin in jail and in a shitload of financial difficulties...
The greatest western soundtrack ever 🙌
Morricone!
@@natewilson111 The Maestro.
Man! Ambushes work great when no one shots back at you!
Yep, the crossing unit broke the first rule of crossing an obstacle. - Secure a couple of covering fire position on their side first.
this scene is so awesome, it remind me when I was childhood that watched movie
rest in peace Ennio Morricone the maestro of soundtrack 👏👏
Soundtracks ruin every film. Have you ever been in the military and in action? There is no music.
@@Demun1649 sure,I was served at the army. is that so? if so,sorry to you
@@vinsblack2 Were you in the British army? I wasn't, I served in the very best regiment, in the best army in the world.
@@Demun1649 nope,sorry buddy I'm a s.korean from northeast Asia
@@vinsblack2 Aaahh, South Korea, the country that breaks World Trade Organisation Regulations ever day, just to keep fair competition out. My sympathies for you having to drive all the KIAs, the Hyundais, Daewoos and all the other crap.
A forward-looking film, the MG42 was used in the Mexican Civil War twenty years before it was developed. And totally cool how Rod Steiger leans against the hot-shot Maxim MG without getting burned. Leone at his best.
It's a 42 but rate of fire seemed a bit slow. Were they adjustable? The Maxim had no water feed to the cooling jacket & the hole in the end of the barrel didn't look 7.92 to me. After a 250rd belt yes it may have been a bit warm.
@@aussie6910 The rate sounds slow. My MG3 (same like MG42) in the german Bundeswehr shot 1200 rounds/minute. We called it the NATO buzz saw!😉👍
@@ron9320 You also forget to mention there's no water hooked up to the cooling system of that Vickers.
😂 Never seen the film but the MG 42 was the 1st thing I noticed too. Must admit I missed the no water cooling myself.
@@ron9320 MG42/G3 that gives it different firing rates, 900, 1,200 and 1,500 rounds per minute, which bolt gets put in one is up to the units commander and the doctrine that dictates the particular situation, ie defensive, offensive, ammo supply and barrel change out concerns for the situation.
When I read that it made sense because I've noticed over the years that in war footage and even in the movies it seems like you'll see different firing rates from them going from fast to all out silly fast.
I guess the different bolts have different weights and that's what changes the firing rate from one to the other.
Un vrai spectacle. La meilleure scène du film il était une fois la révolution avec James Coburn. Merci.
They would have saved thousands of rounds of ammo if they had just blown it up first...
Not so, because of the gun fire, the soldiers take cover under the bridge... and then they get killed by the explosion...
@@jandoerlidoe3412 That explosion was big enough to get everyone. On, under and besides the bridge.
Let it go, mop up the rest with bullets.
But hey, great scene anyhow
Ammo is heavy. Best work on that tinnitus and save your back.
To Kill the enemy
@@NardoVogt yeap i tought the same, first blown up to everybody with the explosion, and after come the bullet rain over the few rest that survive :D
I loved the officer at the end, "completely dazed, "What happened?"
Nothing in any movie will take me closer to the joy of conquering the foe that cometh to my front door, better than this scene, ever.
Amen sister!!Amen 🙏🙏🙏
Épinglez les morceaux de texteÉpinglez les morceaux de texte copiés pour qu'ils n'expirent pas après 1 heureÉpinglez les morceaux de texte copiés pour qu'ils n'expirent pas après 1 heure copiés pour qu'ils n'expirent pas après 1 heure
Qu’est-ce is
75
65
@@paulstellwag1215
est
Année
Filière
Qu’est-ce is
Filière in this area that h
Image
Filière and is the one
Année
Année universitaire
Is
Année universitaire
You can have a great h
Les
Année en
Yy
You
Année
Année
And
In Filière your belly will
Année
Année
Y
Théorie générale Théorie générale
Image 🖼
en
Y
Un
H
Année
J'utilise is your favorite hair you hhhhh your favorite your favorite hhhhh yarn is theme and the
that
hhhhhhh hhhhhhh hhy
@@paulstellwag1215 6yhyy
H
hhhh you h
Hhhhhy
Hta hy
and j'y
Théorie pense
Hh
A yh
You
Hta yh
H
H
H
Mobile has been
Years old
H
Years ago Years ago
in
Hh
J'utilise hh
Yh
H
Years
hyhyhh
You hh
You
hyhn hy
Hhy
H
3:19 Love that momentary glance Juan and Sean give one another. They are clearly enjoying themselves. 😃
Using machine gun fire to drive their victims under the bridge was a brilliant piece of script and film making. Instant death, no burial service required, party OVER.
A joy to see stunt horses in action : rear up , turn the head to the opposite side of impact , fall (actually, a roll) onto a shoulder , jump up , completely unharmed , ready for the next take . If you see a front end nose plant , the horse has been tripped . Laws against that .
Music score was worth a giggle !
Uhh , they turn their head because the rider throws them
I'm always amazed that in these action movies the good guys never run out of ammo.
With the explosives in place, did they really need *any* ammunition at all?
And the "good guys" never seem to need to reload. EVER.
@@mikebronicki8264 I think the idea was to get them to bunch up behind the bridge so they could all be blown up. Otherwise, only a fraction of the troops would be on the bridge at any given time.
@@honzo1078 Yes. They were herding them down below the bridge as you can see who is left going down behind it right before they flash back to the hillside and he sets off the explosion.
I love the bit where Rod Steigers character (Juan Miranda) tries to shoot the machine gun and it's not working then it starts all off on it's own and he's like praying to God and not what he expected and he's trying to hold on to it like it's got a life of it's own! LOL! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
In movies, the ennemy is always stupid and never takes any initiative, does not shoot back.
Fun clip, but the last part leaves me SMH for a bunch of reasons. Hundreds of rounds and not one targeted at the tank? No counter-fire from the tank? Spend all that ammo and *then* blow the bridge (leaving the tank inconvenienced but still operational)? And while I've never fired an MG like that one, I'm not sure I'd want to lay fingers on the shroud after running a whole case through on full auto.
Possibly the most epic real explosion in any film ever.
It is, althow the explosion of the bridge in 'the Good ,the bad and the ugly' is severe too...look at that scene when the piles almost hit Clint and Eli
Man I hate to be a naysayer but it doesn’t look that impressive to me. There have to be better real explosions, particularly with more fire like in Apocalypse Now or something...
@@makinbacongreasyagain968 all I can say to you is Duck, you sucker !
@@makinbacongreasyagain968 are you kidding me how can barrels of gas going into the open sky better than absolutely leveling a heavy stone structure
Mad Max 2 gas refinery explosion is the largest ever on film
I've never seen an MG-42 run that slow ! Ohh yeah , it's a movie !!! 😂
I'd say it ran really fast, since it got there about 30 years before it was invented.
Guy places his hands on the barrel after shooting the MG continuously for a few minutes... yeah, that's realistic.
1Water cooled 30 cal. With a water jacket it would be fine to hold
If you mean the big fat barrel it's a water cooled Browning or Maxim MG, its full of water to cool the inner barrel. Should be warm but not hot enough to burn.
And an MG42 in 1913...
People were a lot tougher back then
as enjoyable as the turkey shoot was, maybe they could've opened with the explosives 🤣
I think they wanted the cavalry to cluster in the valley behind the bridge before they blew it.
The explosions would also daze the surviving enemy and prevent pursuit.
Blowing it at the start would only take out part of the convoy. Although when the gun jammed he could’ve gone to plan B if he didn’t clear it when he did.
I see you have played some *just cause 3*
Could have took out the 1st wave of soldiers with that explosion then mowed what was left with the mini Gatlins.
@@marycox2109 How would they see who was left through the dust cloud?
@@jonsmitt9769 - I think that it was part of the plan all the time; the best way to prevent the inevitable calvary pursuit is to bury all of them after killing a bunch of 'em.
What an interesting scene. The killing of hundreds of men, and beautiful music. 2 guys smiling at each other while they pump hundreds of bullets into the enemy.
Unappreciated film…well worth watching
Machine gun used is of WW2 German 42- Now this scene is from 1942 or 45!
Crossing a pinchpoint (bridge-in this instant) without surveying the land ahead of it is just asking for trouble.
especially beacause they even had horses
yes, a really stupid scene
to add is, why not blow up the bridge with the enemy units on it and use the MG ammo, to attack the enemies in the rear?
@@Blei1986 you can see that not all of them could fit on the bridge on one time. the point of the mg fire is to funnel them under the bridge where they think they are safe, and just drop the bridge on all of them.
@@ethan20559 as i said, they all would have been killed/unable to fight if they blew up the bridge when it was filled with enemies.
totally unlogic to first shoot MGs empty and THEN blow up the bridge, allowing the enemies in the rear to spread out to flee/take cover)
@@Blei1986 you can see that they took cover under the bridge, where they then got blown up...
The gun James Coburn uses is a German MG 42,it was produced from 1942-1945,so I would say that the timeline is a little off. 😉
As is the slow firing rate (ie, not 1200-1500 rpm).
@@WulfPAK100 Exactly my thoughts!
Could be an MG 38. Don't know what era this movie was set in.
@@jhgeorg you mean MG34, 38 would have been MP38 (maschinenpistole/maschinengewehr). Movie was set in 1910's during Mexican revolutions. It's a movie, no one expects them to be factual, they're entertainment 🙂
Mexican revolution : 20 November 1910 - 21 May 1920
(9 years, 6 months and 1 day).
Sergio Leone didn't like bridges at all
Yeah but he loved dynamite.
And Shaun reilly despised 'locusts' (soldiers).
Neither does pewdiepie
From the Good the Bad and the Ugly to Fistful of Dynamite
Not even a little bit !
Voice of Edda Dell'Orso...amazing
im just glad none of the horses ever die in these shootouts in the movies
The music is so 60s/ 70s.... very romantic.
Very Morricone...
The music choice for that scene is not what I think people are feeling.
Rewatching this today, what a great OST Morricone did
I didn’t know that they had a German MG-42 from WWII at this time. 🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐
did Sean fire with MG42 machine gun? lol
It really looked like one right? Maybe just the gun frame...
@@makinbacongreasyagain968 it was a 42 without the stock. obviously wrong for the time but there were a few anomalies. I mean the ira weren't around till 1919 and this 1912. plus the pistol on the train is way wrong too. but no drama. best western ever. and score.
Yes, that was an MG42.
@@clintdavies491 dude i literally was talking about that while watching the movie with my dad
It in theory was an MG15. A WW1 predecessor to the MG42.
James Colburn what a man. ✌️👊
James Coburn is quite a character too.
Like how he cycled from Stalag Luft 3 in north west Poland to Spain in 1944 'Great Escape'
About 3000 miles.
My favorite movie for ever ...if you don't appreciate this movie (if you are a Man )... sorry for you.
I've never seen this movie and somehow I am glad about that.
Real exciting eh?
Where's Clint Eastwood when you need him?
I saw Duck You Sucker as the second film at a drive-in theater.
Sorry for you, maybe you are too much young... Is a great classic.
All those bullets flying through the air and not one horse was killed. Nice shooting.
One of the best westerns of all time. Way better than the Good, Bad and Ugly.
Whats de name of the movies
Leone didn't fuck around with explosions
the machine gun sound effects are awsome.
So was the sound of the bridge detonation, THAT WAS AWESOME!!!!
So wouldn't it have been smarter to blow the bridge with everyone crossing & save all the ammo for cleanup? Just saying!
Kinda thinking that myself...🤷♀️
he used the MGs to force the remaining fleeing soldiers to hide under the bridge before he blow it up. maximizing his damage. MGs were just an distraction.
@@sweetpoison5341 Hence my comment..."& save the ammo for cleanup". They could both have been taken out by the cannon in the tank. But hey, it's just a cheap billy bang bang!
@@myredute first of all the convey is too long/massive to fit onto the bridge at once. if you blow it up at first, there would be a good portion of survivors left and MG would have a hard time killing them. if you blow up the "cover", it would just scatter the survivors all over. by shoot first, you will "corral" the survivors into what they thought was a good cover, and then blow up the "cover" in one go. Second, it's hard to pin point 2 very well covered MG over a distance even with modern equipment, you can watch what those ambush videos in Afghan war, it would be much harder for pre-ww2 equipment to be able to "take out" anything in those situation.
@@myredute but I do agree that this is just movie and it's far from reality. In reality, trained soldiers wouldn't just piled into ONE cover, they would spread out and find the nearest cover and return fire. MG at those distance wouldn't have that kind of accuracy either, especially with the way that they are firing (non-stop). One of them ( the guy with Maxim MG doesn't even seem to have been trained properly. They would be lucky if they can hit anything at all in reality.
The guy in the white shirt his machine gun looks like a German MG42 or MG34 from ww2
Play Hamster Kombat and get easy money!
t.me/Hamster_kombat_bot/start?startapp=kentId6340831383
the sound track for this film is brilliant as well... ( fist full of dynamite )
Rests his hand on the barrel of that .50 cal right after firing an entire box of ammo from it. Right.
Um, not a .50.
@@donscheid97 Ok. A .30 cal. Still would be hot enough to fry his hand.
sprays several hundred machine gun rounds from 2 beltfeds,….then puts in ear protection LOLOL
Thats what made me laugh...he'd be pretty deaf by that point!
After thousand round firing from HMG...still the barrel is not hot...
Its happened in Hollywood / Bollywood movies only
Excellent Movie..... Saw it at the Strand in a little Northeastern town...
When movies were real. Shom shom
Magnifique,inoubliable.👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Steiger and Coburn. Great actors and awesome movie too.
ONE OF THE BEST MOVIES - EVER !!!
Why does every brainless ass say whatever movie is being reviewed is the best movie ever? Dumb ass people.
@@john2914 This one is really one of the best movies-ever, let's say, in my top 100 list.
The one mistake Sean makes is he didn't get the Colonel in the blast. Now the Colonel is a fairly ruthless indivdual before this scene but after... he will stop at nothing to get revenge on Sean and Juan. He'll burn villages, shoot hostages... every action has an equal and opposite reaction and the Colonel's reaction is going to be equally brutal. Imagine for a moment you were a soldier and something like this happened to your unit, the fury and the burning desire for revenge would be horrifying...
Did much better around the World than in America . Not a popcorn movie. His best film by far
MG 42 would indeed be making some carnage, but sadly, it would be drawing massive amounts of fire. Great flick, like all he did. Fine actor, back in the day when it was a true craft.
They had MG42's back then? Not so much
Well, they obviously had one for the shooting of this szene. ;-)
Only trouble is, an MG42 would be firing at the men on the bridge about 30 years after they had crossed.
Untouchables my favourite movie , like the Mounties here
Bridges.
Bridges?!?!
WE NO NEED NO STINKING BRIDGES !!!
Filme extraordinário !!! Atores, música, direção, roteiro , maravilhosos. Uma obra prima !
@Angry Combat Wombat I always would like to know how they do this too
Qual é o nome desse filme?
@@israelbarbosa677 - "Quando Explode a Vingança" 1971
1:55
God: "No shooting unless Papa pulls the trigger."
Army Lesson #49: Don't waste 1,000's of rounds of ammo when the bridge is wired to blow.
PS - Put the ear plugs in your ears before you start the attack.
Amry Lesson #159: If u have the Time Machine , dont pick a Mg43 from WW2...pick a Lasergun or Rocket Launcher!
Or get a Hulk.
@@lewisdean22 SMASH!
What a thoughtless destruction of a "mighty fine bridge!!"
So he’s sitting on a ridge surrounded by brown dirt in a bright white shirt in full sight.
And no bug-out route. ...... Plus not one shot fired back.
The strange thing is that there is a clear anachronism, This film is during the Mexican war (1914-16) and the MG42 wasn't invented until 1943.
The song that plays is the theme song for a radio channel in Montreal. Chom fm. Too funny!!!
MG42 went back in time
That's what happens when you cross a bone dry river bed through a narrow bridge.
That happened to me once.
Well I got better.
On one else wonder why they didnt just blow it up WHILE they were all on it?
Look closely. There's a long line of troops. Wouldn't get them all unless they all take cover under the bridge.
@@mikepastor.k6233 im not good at ambushes
Russian synchonization best synchronization of the world :)
Wow, an MG-42 being used some 32 years before it actually entered production.
who cares? enjoy! it's called fiction for a good reason :)
I had never heard of this movie, and didn't know that Once Upon A Time In The West had any companion movies. Must watch soon!
They don't really have any kind of connection except the title (in some markets in which it was called Once Upon a Time.....the Revolution) it is a good movie though very underrated among Leone's works.
Incredibly long ammunition belts….
Gun barrel on th M42 would have over heated also. Not so much on the water cooled machine gun, if they kept water up to it.
Ha, that's what I was thinking.
@@jamesbondoo81 Not that there would have been any MG42 in 1913's Mexico. ;-) But obviously there was one in 1971 Spain. ;-)
I think the size of the explosion surprised the film crew. Bit bigger than expected.
Well, my guess is they didn't have to blow this bridge up twice, lol...
Perfect, absolutely perfect.
Sean seems to be using the MG42, introduced long after this period - and how did they get machine guns?
From the movie studio storage))
From his "Iron Cross".....movie
Not.
James Coburn is firing a WWII German MG42 without a stock.
And the armoured car isn't returning fire? Also a Vickers needs two operators
no one cares
No, only one. Reloading is easier with two (or more)
Its a great scene in part because at least the sheeting seems mildly realistic - unlike most films where ammo never runs out and is weightless, barrels never heat and need changing or cooling and shooting scenes are so close they could throw rocks at each other - the distances feel about right (good range but not so close they can easily see where you are, rally or flank).
Guess the armoured car crew would be looking through a slot wouldn’t see well where its coming from in an old armoured car without some guy knocking on the lid to point and probably getting shot off. By then there’d be almost no one left on foot and you’d have blown the bridge and be moving to a new position to keep them down while you scoot.
by the way thats not a Vickers, its a a ww2 german mg42 (an anachronism). Thats a far faster firing gun and doesn’t need two people except to schlep all the ammo. A second person would be a spotter to watch peripherals and would be needed to carry ammo (the gun is heavy enough but this thing can eat +1200 round per minute and at +10g per bullet a few 250 round cans of thats +25kg for less than 15 seconds of full firing) but the second person is not needed to reload.
If this was realistic You’d want to be far quicker - hit them at each end of the convoy to drive them onto bridge, blow the bridge and move it to mop up or discourage pursuit or move to a second prepared place. If you stayed as long as he does they’d eventually spot and snipe you down when reloading (very vulnerable during the c 7seconds to reload a belt or change barrel) so he wants to be in a concealed position and to move fast unless he could get them all. Gunners didn’t live long in either Ww1 or 2 for those reasons.
I'll bet it's one of the biggest movie blasts ever filmed! The ground jumped for 500 feet around when it went off! Like the one in "the Good, the Bad and the Ugly" when they dynamited the bridge and a rock almost hit the camera!
And yet he was able to plunge down that battery box with one hand.
@@coopersmill Yeah!!! Hollyweird huh!!! Ever seen inside the box? The rack of the plunger spins a pinion gear on the armature of a generator, like in a wood telephone, faster and faster, and at the bottom of the travel, 2 contacts come together and send a surge down the wire at the peak speed of the generator, to deliver the best voltage! AND........it takes a lot of force to operate it!!!
@@junkdeal I had an uncle that blasted stumps & rock for a living. I've seen inside the box and even tried to use on a few times.
C'mon fellas three second bursts
With a 15,000 round belt...load
A well- executed ambush.
Such precision...not one horse shot but every rider killed!
А ,что сразу нельзя было взорвать?
TIME AFTER TIME25
ale jak w tych czasach był używany niemiecki MG-42 tylko kolby mu brak ......
Love it but....I highly doubt he would be resting his arm on the barrel of that Browning....
Looked more like a Vickers than a Browning!
when i was a teen i wasn't shocked by such scenes, but now, as an adult... i don't know...
these calibers... each bullet rips a head, explodes brain, eyes, tears guts, cuts people in half, and kill the horses, also.
And these guys, they are sheep, sons taken from their mothers, to fight for something, someone they don't even know or really care.
I would... i wouldn't like it. I would feel bad. And yet, so many movies depict killing as a good time.
Surely, i would kill if i had to, but... in a situation like that... maybe i would do it, but i would break my teeth tightening my jaw. I would feel it in my Heart, i think.
Good news for you, you're never going to have the chance to kill an Imperial kraut caravan anyway