the small problem of finding who is the fake pro is that it's easy to play bad on purpose，if someone is just trying to mess you up he can just answer questions and play really bad
@@OnlySkeep Maybe the pros just want the challenge to fail who knows? Or maybe they don’t want to get eliminate and want to keep playing? Or not doing it on purpose just not taking the questions that serious? The point is I don’t think doing good just to eliminate yourself is a good rule
@@bcsa8079 bro what? why would the pro wants the challenge to fail? what is the point of that if they get nothing.. their role was to play the same way as they play in their normal games, nothing more. There is no way around in doing this type of challenge, so you have what you get. Also what you mean not taking the question that serious, the questions were really simple, if you know you know , if not that's it. Also why would you have to think something that hasn't happened.. it wasn't that easy to find the fake pro and that's the point, or it was just a boring video were you already know Who the fake was..
@@OnlySkeep No I’m not saying they did it. I’m just saying the rule might not be good. And for the reason they want to fail who knows it’s a possibility, maybe they think it’s fun to do it since there’s no reason not to make it fail. For not taking the question seriously I mean for example the one that 2 players play head to head pros might play moves that he might not play if he thinks more time but because there’s nothing on the line he just blitz out the move
The 2 knights question was a giveaway. You CAN checkmate them, if your opponent runs into a corner. The reason it's a draw is because you can't force a checkmate.
3:54 My answer would be: It varies. Since you get NM from your national chess federation and FM from Fide it can vary. In the USA it is generally easier to achieve NM, but in the USSR, about 400 people got the GM title, but only 140 got NM, since you had to win a regional or national championship to achieve the title. Thus, it depends
@@grnarsch5287 there are forced situations, but i think only for 1/2 move mates. you can't force them into the corner, but if you have them in the corner, there are a few situations, that are forced mate
@@schwingedeshaehers maybe??? But Dont think so to make it a mate you have to check him into the corner and i think there is alwas at least one other square and there is no way to cover it cause only 2 N. As far as i understand this endgame We are maybe talking about pretty simular stuff. But there is no way an oponent goes into the corner with check not even to capture an oponents piece (just if its a massive blunder)
@@grnarsch5287 random 2 knight situations are draw. there are a few constructed situations, where it is won. (like there are a few (constructed) situations, that are draw, with 2 bishops (both attacked by the king, and not defended))
the problem is that the mates are unreachable without having a stalemate beforehand. If it is 2 knights vs 1 pawn, a mate is actually possible. You have to block the pawn and let it walk at the right moments to avoid stalemate. A rare sitiuation where having material acutally harms you.
Very good content on my feed. I wouldn’t exactly call 2000 rapids pro however. 1550 classical is very bad. Especially if USCF. A 2200 blitz could make up for such a rating.
@@steeleso2235 It might be technically possible, but it's in no way realistic, especially that 2 such guys just happen to be in the video. Im rated 1930 fide and play tournaments semi actively, my winnings combined are not even half of what I have spent on participation. Some 1500 saying they have payed for college is just crazy to me
@@steeleso2235 Sure winning the lottery is possible, it's not at all conceivable that 2 such guys just happen to be in the video. I'm 1930 fide and my winnings probably don't cover half of my participation costs. Some 1500 saying they have payed for college is the most ret*rted shit I have heard all week
@@edgarcito4420 nah y'all tripping, yes 2 knights vs king is not able to force mate, but if the king goes to edge of board, knights can make a mating net with 4 squares, your king blocks 2. This involves the other person ignoring capture of the knight, which would just be a draw
@@neverbrokeagain191 Its not abt making beginner chess easier. Its about making top-level chess more decisive and exciting. Many endgames like 2 knights and king vs king, king and pawn vs king etc will become wins, hence reducing the number of draws.
@@ethanlal4517 That would just mean that people have no incentive to fight back. If you know that almost every endgame down 1-2 points of material is completely dead for you, why even try to play on? Draws are not necessarily bad things. There would be far fewer fighting draws where people squeeze a draw out of an inferior position. If you genuinely think that the fact that a scorecard saying 1 instead of 0.5 at the expense of making comebacks far, far, far more uncommon would make the game more exciting then you need to seriously reevaluate why you play this game. A game where somebody is down material but manages to swindle their opponent into only being up a knight with nothing else, giving them a good result in an otherwise hopeless position is far more interesting than watching a king be chased around by a king and knight for thirty moves before awarding one player the full point.
no its always a draw you can even premove all you want because two knights will always result in a stalemate, if the opponent has another piece like a pawn its a win but if its a knight or a bishop or generally anything higher its also a draw but queen is a win if done properly
@@Xaviercommentsection 2 knights is a win vs a pawn, bc you need to reach a position where only a pawn can move and u maye on the next move, so 2 knights vs a king IS A DRAW.
@@Xaviercommentsection 2 knights, king vs King and Pawn is a win with the side who has 2 knights, but if its 2 knights, king vs King its a draw learn your theory
How is 2000 online rating a pro? That's Mid Amateur lvl. Maybe you couldn't find higher rated players or maybe it would have been way too obvious but that's pretty clickbaity. Other than that it's a rlly cool Video Idea. One thing I didn't rlly understand. Aren't the Pros trying to not get eliminated aka pretend to be bad? They don't seem to be doing that at all. And now gotta call out some stuff. I am also over 2000 online and 1800 uscf. NO 1500 makes money, let alone good money, from tournements... That's a crazy lie. 1500 is beginner lvl for these tournaments. He stands no chance and is just getting farmed. What is dude talking about? Edit: WHAT... Dude is claiming to have made enough money for College while being 1600??? Bro these are all 400s. They are all lying their asses off 😂😂 Last guy as well... Bro literally every single one of them is completely lying... What is this?
In the world of chess, a rating of 2000 is a significant milestone, often marking the transition from an amateur to a professional level of play. This rating, part of the Elo rating system developed by Arpad Elo, is used to measure the relative skill levels of players. While there are many amateur chess players with ratings below 2000, those who reach or exceed this rating demonstrate a mastery of the game that places them in a higher echelon, worthy of being considered professional. Firstly, achieving a 2000 rating requires a deep understanding of chess fundamentals. Players at this level have a solid grasp of opening theory, middle-game strategies, and endgame techniques. They have studied countless hours, not only playing games but also analyzing them, learning from both their own mistakes and the games of others. This level of dedication and study is characteristic of a professional approach to any discipline. For example, a 2000-rated player will be familiar with a wide range of opening lines and will know how to navigate the complexities that arise from them, often several moves deep into the game. Their understanding of pawn structures, piece coordination, and tactical motifs is far superior to that of an amateur. Moreover, a 2000-rated player has a high level of consistency in their performance. They can reliably compete and hold their own against other strong players, including titled players such as FIDE Masters (FMs) and International Masters (IMs). This consistency is a hallmark of professionalism, as it demonstrates not just talent but also the ability to perform under pressure, adapt to different opponents, and maintain a high level of play over time. Consistency at this level is built through extensive practice, mental fortitude, and a professional approach to preparation and competition. In addition to skill and consistency, a 2000-rated player has likely participated in numerous tournaments, both online and over-the-board. They understand the rigors of competitive play, including the psychological aspects of facing strong opponents, managing time controls, and enduring the physical and mental demands of long games. Their tournament experience provides them with insights into tournament strategies, such as knowing when to play aggressively for a win or when to settle for a draw based on the standings. This strategic awareness is another indicator of their professional level. Furthermore, many 2000-rated players contribute to the chess community in ways that go beyond playing. They often engage in coaching, sharing their knowledge with aspiring players. Their ability to teach complex concepts in an understandable way is a testament to their deep understanding of the game. They may also write articles, create instructional videos, or participate in chess clubs and forums, further solidifying their role as professionals within the chess community. Lastly, the distinction between amateur and professional in chess is not solely based on rating but also on the approach to the game. A 2000-rated player treats chess with the seriousness and respect of a professional sport. They invest in their development, continuously seek to improve, and often have goals that extend beyond casual play. They may aspire to achieve higher titles, such as National Master (NM) or even International Master (IM), and their dedication to these goals is reflective of a professional mindset. In conclusion, a 2000-rated chess player exemplifies many characteristics of a professional. Their deep understanding of the game, consistent performance, tournament experience, contribution to the chess community, and professional approach all set them apart from amateurs. While the journey to higher ratings and titles continues, reaching a 2000 rating is a significant achievement that marks a player as a true professional in the world of chess.
@@The_Croissant I am above 2000 rated myself and I am nothing but a hobby player. We do not earn Money and we consider it a Hobby at best. "Professional" has an actual definition. You can't just make one up yourself. A professional (at anything) is someone who does said thing for a living. At chess that does not start until ~2500 rating. And btw that's not online Rating but Otb. At online rating you would have to be around 2700-2800 minimum to be considered a professional under normal circumstances by definition. The ppl in this Video where about 1500 rated otb. Which is considered beginner lvl on otb tournaments. They are the guys you hope you get matched in the first round for a easy free point. They do not win anything and they do not earn any money. Making the claim that 1500 rated otb is professional is factually incredibly wrong. And 1500 it's also not the point where ppl start to take it seriously as a profession or whatever. That would be around 2300-2400. At least 800 points higher... Also why did you just write 20 pages about how great 2000s are and ignored all my other questions? I am over 2000. I know how I think and what that means. Thanks for the lecture...
@@The_Croissant Also I find it hilarious how you wrote that as if I have no clue about "the world of chess". That's the most downlooking lecture I have ever gotten about something which I am a part of. Crazy. Probably just copied it from somewhere but still... Please inform yourself first. If you had said that you just wanted to make the Title more interesting and know that it's not factual I wouldn't mind at all but this is copium.
@@The_Croissant Very noticable. That was about the most condescending lecture I have ever gotten. Also ofc just completely wrong. They were 1500 and not 2000. The prompt was about otb rating. Many other mistakes with it as well but I am repeating myself. You don't have to know much about chess but that's crazy copium. If you tell any actual Chess expert that you consider 1500 to be "professional" They will fall to the ground laughing. And again, they do not earn a single cent. Did you tell them to lie for the Video or what was that all about? Literally every single one of them was outright lying their asses off. 1500 can be achieved within 6 months. The way they are represented here is crazy.
I'd beg to differ. I've played chess masters myself who were terrible at bullet (sub 2k) but of course, they're titled and are amazing chess players when it comes to slower chess, some people just do better in slow chess
@@foxygamerxdyt7356very true, I am 1900 in bullet and get paired up with NM, CM, and FM who are trash at bullet but are like 2100-2200 in blitz or rapid. Some people do better at slower time controls and some do better at faster.
No it isnt its always a draw/ you can force a draw. You can just force a win if the oponent still has one pawn and this pawn needs distance to the queening sqare depending what kind of pawn it is (a,b,c,d)
I will send croissant a croissant for every like on this comment
send 1 crossaint
send 14 croissants
send 32 croissants
Send 37 croissant
@@elimasonofficial 54 is crazy look at my challenge
you should make the opposite (5 fake beginners and 1 real beginner) and try to find out who the real beginner is.
Nah the pro ones can just play bad and it would be bad
when the +12.1 and then get mated of blundering
@@TurkicEditorX but its fun imagine the pain of having 3 queens at the end and you cant show a fast mate
@@TurkicEditorXthe opposite would be crazy tho
@@TurkicEditorX omg you must be the smartest guy alive
Not only does he name a female grandmaster, he names the most recent woman to become a grandmaster
Bro is trying to find a girlfriend
the small problem of finding who is the fake pro is that it's easy to play bad on purpose，if someone is just trying to mess you up he can just answer questions and play really bad
what? the pro ones doen't get anything so what is the point of acting bad? It's only the fake pro that gets the price if he doesn't get caught
@@OnlySkeep Maybe the pros just want the challenge to fail who knows? Or maybe they don’t want to get eliminate and want to keep playing? Or not doing it on purpose just not taking the questions that serious? The point is I don’t think doing good just to eliminate yourself is a good rule
@@bcsa8079 bro what? why would the pro wants the challenge to fail? what is the point of that if they get nothing.. their role was to play the same way as they play in their normal games, nothing more. There is no way around in doing this type of challenge, so you have what you get.
Also what you mean not taking the question that serious, the questions were really simple, if you know you know , if not that's it.
Also why would you have to think something that hasn't happened.. it wasn't that easy to find the fake pro and that's the point, or it was just a boring video were you already know Who the fake was..
@@OnlySkeep No I’m not saying they did it. I’m just saying the rule might not be good. And for the reason they want to fail who knows it’s a possibility, maybe they think it’s fun to do it since there’s no reason not to make it fail. For not taking the question seriously I mean for example the one that 2 players play head to head pros might play moves that he might not play if he thinks more time but because there’s nothing on the line he just blitz out the move
@@OnlySkeephe could team up with a fake pro. Or just for the sake of content
Amazing video! It was awesome to see give back to your community in a meaningful and proper way. Keep up the great work!
crosiant is the magnus of youtube
no, he is the hikaru of youtube lol
@@ArjunPillai-go3cuHikaru has a yt 💀
@@Mr-dw5zq ik but he is as good as him in streaming but not rating
Magnus has a youtube
Magnus is the Magnus of youtube
Last game was crazy
Finally i had been waiting for so long
I will play a chess game for every like
KEEP IT AT ONE
11 now
12
Play hyperbullet
ok this is doable
Am I the only one who always thinks, the sound at the end of all his videos is the UDSSR anthem, until it isn’t?
United Democratic Soviet Socialist Republic hits hard
its the squid game music
Hi, I am one of the participants of this video, I was Dwayne Johnson and my main account is an_absolute_tiger
You are my favorite player in the challenge
It should be the other way around, 4 noobs and 1 pro.
Its easy to play bad
You can acutally mate with 2 knights vs king but you can't force it
not a forced mate=draw no one will willingly mate theirselves
you need more subs
I was voting for the real pros
Man, no one does chess content like u, keep up with the good work
your content is really awesome do this again!
Oh yeah, you invited me I asked you to heart me lol, let me see if you can remember me.
Appreciate being in the video and getting the diamond 🙏❤
Worst chess pros of all time
wow this is content is amazing
Nice content bro!!!
Really cool content bro
you know its a good day when croissant drops a new video ;)
Great fun, I'd say 2K is quite far from a pro though lol
How much are u rated?
How much are u rated
yo fellow waseem viewer I read the desc
already looks good
The 2 knights question was a giveaway. You CAN checkmate them, if your opponent runs into a corner. The reason it's a draw is because you can't force a checkmate.
Your opponent must be actually a toddler to run into the corner
@@patrickk9956 Or maybe there was a piece in the corner before the KNN Vs K endgame
You can't check mate even if the opponent goes in the corner because it would be a draw the move before you deliver checkmate
3:54
My answer would be: It varies. Since you get NM from your national chess federation and FM from Fide it can vary. In the USA it is generally easier to achieve NM, but in the USSR, about 400 people got the GM title, but only 140 got NM, since you had to win a regional or national championship to achieve the title.
Thus, it depends
same with the 2 knight. tgere a few situations, where it is firced mate.
@@schwingedeshaehers never forced oponent has to cooperate and go into the corner on his own.
Its only forced if its pawn aganst 2 N in some cases
@@grnarsch5287 there are forced situations, but i think only for 1/2 move mates. you can't force them into the corner, but if you have them in the corner, there are a few situations, that are forced mate
@@schwingedeshaehers maybe??? But Dont think so to make it a mate you have to check him into the corner and i think there is alwas at least one other square and there is no way to cover it cause only 2 N. As far as i understand this endgame
We are maybe talking about pretty simular stuff. But there is no way an oponent goes into the corner with check not even to capture an oponents piece (just if its a massive blunder)
@@grnarsch5287 random 2 knight situations are draw. there are a few constructed situations, where it is won.
(like there are a few (constructed) situations, that are draw, with 2 bishops (both attacked by the king, and not defended))
I would get wrecked in bullet to be fair. Never even played it. I'm 1972 but the lowest time frame I've ever played is 30 minutes 🤭.
bro you can mate with 2 knight and a king an example position would be: Ka8 Ka6 Nc7 Nc6
the problem is that the mates are unreachable without having a stalemate beforehand.
If it is 2 knights vs 1 pawn, a mate is actually possible. You have to block the pawn and let it walk at the right moments to avoid stalemate. A rare sitiuation where having material acutally harms you.
I learned so much about chess
like the Coca-cola opening
THats crazy arturchess is my freind irl
Sadly i didn't take part of this video... Cool stuff
You can checkmate with 2 knights bro
When ur opponent has a pawn left
Yeah
This Queen's Gambit slander will not stand
4:49 “Jeff Bezos Gardener | 115 2nd Ave, New York,NY 10003, United” I wonder what that is
4:21 bro has his house number 💀
Croissant Dealer is chessnotmeth he gave it to his friends
Very good content on my feed.
I wouldn’t exactly call 2000 rapids pro however.
1550 classical is very bad.
Especially if USCF.
A 2200 blitz could make up for such a rating.
You can checkmate with 2 nights it's just really hard
night
@@The_Croissant lol I meant knights
4:22 I said Pia Cramling. That isn’t wrong tho
Croissant wearing a hat?!
Was this inspired by waseem’s video where he did the same thing but to find a brawl stars pro
7:10 Why are the 2 pros lying? There is 0 chance a 1500 rated club players are making +1k playing chess
one of the larger tournaments i went to had a 4k prize for the u1200 section. its very possible
@@steeleso2235 It might be technically possible, but it's in no way realistic, especially that 2 such guys just happen to be in the video. Im rated 1930 fide and play tournaments semi actively, my winnings combined are not even half of what I have spent on participation. Some 1500 saying they have payed for college is just crazy to me
@@steeleso2235 altho if you are good enough to win that prize your rating will surpass 1200 and you won't be eligible for the prize next time
@@steeleso2235 Sure winning the lottery is possible, it's not at all conceivable that 2 such guys just happen to be in the video. I'm 1930 fide and my winnings probably don't cover half of my participation costs. Some 1500 saying they have payed for college is the most ret*rted shit I have heard all week
@@steeleso2235That’s like a 1/1000. Also having 1500 USCF IS NOT considered pro. That’s just intermediate
btw for the club please demote some of the SA
bro said ufcs
UFCF? I used to call it that too😂
When he said queen’s gambit😅
Technically 2Knights+King v King is winnable, but ofc other person must be REALLY bad if that happens
No its not, It can only end as a draw (stealmate), u need 3 knights to win
You can only checkmate with two knights if the other player has at least one pawn
@@ToiMemes i just analized and It Will end as a draw too
@@edgarcito4420 nah y'all tripping, yes 2 knights vs king is not able to force mate, but if the king goes to edge of board, knights can make a mating net with 4 squares, your king blocks 2. This involves the other person ignoring capture of the knight, which would just be a draw
@@edgarcito4420 what your 1000 elo skill? trust me I have played over 10k games and I have seen 2 knights + king mate lone king
0:58- arent you chessnotmeth?
Exactly, he played the 24 hour challenge with that account
He’s giving randoms his accounts to hide their elo. Use your heads
ok does he want to get hacked or smh
I subscribed
their names are ridiculous lmao
basically, amongus,but with chess
I’m a 200 and play the scotch 😂😂
Hi
3:24 wrong it is possible to check mate them but the engine says it's a draw
Found on feed UA-cam and immediately clicked. Wanna more
hi
glad to be in the video
yo wait the intro shows the fake player lol
Bro I ate a Croissant with my cousin then you uploaded!😾
Nice.😹
4:22 Bro just leaked someone's address.
Bro do you think stalemate should be a win? (by letting the king be captured)
The only people who think stalemate should be a draw are shit players who can't even checkmate up a queen
@@neverbrokeagain191 Its not abt making beginner chess easier. Its about making top-level chess more decisive and exciting. Many endgames like 2 knights and king vs king, king and pawn vs king etc will become wins, hence reducing the number of draws.
@@ethanlal4517 That would just mean that people have no incentive to fight back. If you know that almost every endgame down 1-2 points of material is completely dead for you, why even try to play on? Draws are not necessarily bad things. There would be far fewer fighting draws where people squeeze a draw out of an inferior position. If you genuinely think that the fact that a scorecard saying 1 instead of 0.5 at the expense of making comebacks far, far, far more uncommon would make the game more exciting then you need to seriously reevaluate why you play this game. A game where somebody is down material but manages to swindle their opponent into only being up a knight with nothing else, giving them a good result in an otherwise hopeless position is far more interesting than watching a king be chased around by a king and knight for thirty moves before awarding one player the full point.
Meanwhile me with 200 elo:
2:38 i saw a tactic like Ne6, but i’m not sure tbh
Is it just me or is jakefromstatefarm a tmf reference-
체스로 이런 컨텐츠도 가능하네...
I like your vidios
Wasn’t ChessnotMeth your alt?
Chess is very cool :)
Two knights is winnable if they blunder😂😂😂
no its always a draw you can even premove all you want because two knights will always result in a stalemate, if the opponent has another piece like a pawn its a win but if its a knight or a bishop or generally anything higher its also a draw but queen is a win if done properly
@@around15682 no 2 knights is a win learn ur theroey
@@Xaviercommentsection 2 knights is a win vs a pawn, bc you need to reach a position where only a pawn can move and u maye on the next move, so 2 knights vs a king IS A DRAW.
(If i have grammar errors, english is nit my first language)
@@Xaviercommentsection 2 knights, king vs King and Pawn is a win with the side who has 2 knights, but if its 2 knights, king vs King its a draw learn your theory
I'm still wondering how he's paying for most of his college?
don't i think that magnus is the world champion?
08:34 king to h1??
rook d1
wait waseem made thsi
I watched this type of series but it's Brawl Stars version 😂
beta squad
How is 2000 online rating a pro?
That's Mid Amateur lvl.
Maybe you couldn't find higher rated players or maybe it would have been way too obvious but that's pretty clickbaity.
Other than that it's a rlly cool Video Idea.
One thing I didn't rlly understand. Aren't the Pros trying to not get eliminated aka pretend to be bad?
They don't seem to be doing that at all.
And now gotta call out some stuff. I am also over 2000 online and 1800 uscf.
NO 1500 makes money, let alone good money, from tournements...
That's a crazy lie. 1500 is beginner lvl for these tournaments. He stands no chance and is just getting farmed. What is dude talking about?
Edit: WHAT... Dude is claiming to have made enough money for College while being 1600???
Bro these are all 400s.
They are all lying their asses off 😂😂
Last guy as well... Bro literally every single one of them is completely lying... What is this?
In the world of chess, a rating of 2000 is a significant milestone, often marking the transition from an amateur to a professional level of play. This rating, part of the Elo rating system developed by Arpad Elo, is used to measure the relative skill levels of players. While there are many amateur chess players with ratings below 2000, those who reach or exceed this rating demonstrate a mastery of the game that places them in a higher echelon, worthy of being considered professional.
Firstly, achieving a 2000 rating requires a deep understanding of chess fundamentals. Players at this level have a solid grasp of opening theory, middle-game strategies, and endgame techniques. They have studied countless hours, not only playing games but also analyzing them, learning from both their own mistakes and the games of others. This level of dedication and study is characteristic of a professional approach to any discipline. For example, a 2000-rated player will be familiar with a wide range of opening lines and will know how to navigate the complexities that arise from them, often several moves deep into the game. Their understanding of pawn structures, piece coordination, and tactical motifs is far superior to that of an amateur.
Moreover, a 2000-rated player has a high level of consistency in their performance. They can reliably compete and hold their own against other strong players, including titled players such as FIDE Masters (FMs) and International Masters (IMs). This consistency is a hallmark of professionalism, as it demonstrates not just talent but also the ability to perform under pressure, adapt to different opponents, and maintain a high level of play over time. Consistency at this level is built through extensive practice, mental fortitude, and a professional approach to preparation and competition.
In addition to skill and consistency, a 2000-rated player has likely participated in numerous tournaments, both online and over-the-board. They understand the rigors of competitive play, including the psychological aspects of facing strong opponents, managing time controls, and enduring the physical and mental demands of long games. Their tournament experience provides them with insights into tournament strategies, such as knowing when to play aggressively for a win or when to settle for a draw based on the standings. This strategic awareness is another indicator of their professional level.
Furthermore, many 2000-rated players contribute to the chess community in ways that go beyond playing. They often engage in coaching, sharing their knowledge with aspiring players. Their ability to teach complex concepts in an understandable way is a testament to their deep understanding of the game. They may also write articles, create instructional videos, or participate in chess clubs and forums, further solidifying their role as professionals within the chess community.
Lastly, the distinction between amateur and professional in chess is not solely based on rating but also on the approach to the game. A 2000-rated player treats chess with the seriousness and respect of a professional sport. They invest in their development, continuously seek to improve, and often have goals that extend beyond casual play. They may aspire to achieve higher titles, such as National Master (NM) or even International Master (IM), and their dedication to these goals is reflective of a professional mindset.
In conclusion, a 2000-rated chess player exemplifies many characteristics of a professional. Their deep understanding of the game, consistent performance, tournament experience, contribution to the chess community, and professional approach all set them apart from amateurs. While the journey to higher ratings and titles continues, reaching a 2000 rating is a significant achievement that marks a player as a true professional in the world of chess.
@@The_Croissant I am above 2000 rated myself and I am nothing but a hobby player.
We do not earn Money and we consider it a Hobby at best.
"Professional" has an actual definition. You can't just make one up yourself.
A professional (at anything) is someone who does said thing for a living.
At chess that does not start until ~2500 rating.
And btw that's not online Rating but Otb.
At online rating you would have to be around 2700-2800 minimum to be considered a professional under normal circumstances by definition.
The ppl in this Video where about 1500 rated otb. Which is considered beginner lvl on otb tournaments. They are the guys you hope you get matched in the first round for a easy free point.
They do not win anything and they do not earn any money.
Making the claim that 1500 rated otb is professional is factually incredibly wrong.
And 1500 it's also not the point where ppl start to take it seriously as a profession or whatever.
That would be around 2300-2400.
At least 800 points higher...
Also why did you just write 20 pages about how great 2000s are and ignored all my other questions?
I am over 2000. I know how I think and what that means. Thanks for the lecture...
@@The_Croissant Also I find it hilarious how you wrote that as if I have no clue about "the world of chess". That's the most downlooking lecture I have ever gotten about something which I am a part of. Crazy.
Probably just copied it from somewhere but still...
Please inform yourself first.
If you had said that you just wanted to make the Title more interesting and know that it's not factual I wouldn't mind at all but this is copium.
@@eliasvonbrille it was chat gpt 🫤
@@The_Croissant Very noticable. That was about the most condescending lecture I have ever gotten.
Also ofc just completely wrong. They were 1500 and not 2000.
The prompt was about otb rating.
Many other mistakes with it as well but I am repeating myself.
You don't have to know much about chess but that's crazy copium.
If you tell any actual Chess expert that you consider 1500 to be "professional" They will fall to the ground laughing.
And again, they do not earn a single cent. Did you tell them to lie for the Video or what was that all about?
Literally every single one of them was outright lying their asses off.
1500 can be achieved within 6 months. The way they are represented here is crazy.
I will increase my ELO by 5 for every like I get or reply
How about rapid?
2 knights can checkmate
Crosaint is the best Chess youtuber imo.
I like everyones comment😊
Can my 400 elo account get the diamond membership also?
So i can review my every 2 moves missed and blunder more than once a day?
1600 USCF doesnt make you a pro
THE FAKE PRO WAS THE ONE IN THE START
4:25 free address
Chess not meth used a chess bot fs. If he was trash in bullet then good in 10 minute that is really sketchy
I'd beg to differ. I've played chess masters myself who were terrible at bullet (sub 2k) but of course, they're titled and are amazing chess players when it comes to slower chess, some people just do better in slow chess
@@foxygamerxdyt7356very true, I am 1900 in bullet and get paired up with NM, CM, and FM who are trash at bullet but are like 2100-2200 in blitz or rapid. Some people do better at slower time controls and some do better at faster.
1500s are pros at chess? lmao
2000s*
you used the account chessnotmeth before
nobody knows what they doing bruh
imagine calling a 2000 rated players a "pros" xd
I am a 400 elo and i am in elite
e
3:20 only in curtain position two knights can draw but most of the time it is a win
ye its a win
No it isnt its always a draw/ you can force a draw. You can just force a win if the oponent still has one pawn and this pawn needs distance to the queening sqare depending what kind of pawn it is (a,b,c,d)
Day one of wanting crossisnt to oil up
What the hell his content is insane and my channel has more subscribers 😂than
None of the players are pros lol
Is everyone ignoring face reveal
1 view in 4 minutes? bro fell off
(jk)