Exactly. Think about the bigger picture too. He's holding back the advancement of the entire world if he is only money driven. He should do the right thing and make one of these companies a realistic offer so he's not holding the entire world back from their potential and instead help to fund the advancement of our society.
I think it's important to stick to stocks that are immune to economic policies. AI stocks that have the potential to power and transform future technologies. It seems AI is the trajectory most companies are taking, including even established FAANG companies. Maybe there are other recommendations?
I bought into NVIDIA around September last year because my financial advisor recommended it to me. She said the company is selling shovels in a gold rush. It accounted for almost 80% of my market return this year.
@@MercuriosBakers That's a great analogy and I love the insight. Professionals could make a really big difference in investing, and I think everyone should have one. There are aspects of market trends that are difficult for the untrained eyes to see.
@@CharliesMcCormicks There are many independent advisors to choose from. But I work with MARGARET MOLLI ALVEY and we've been working together for almost four years and she's fantastic. You could pursue her if she meets your requirements. I agree with her.
@@bampoe8670 Jensen is trying to prevent mass adoption of Quantum technology, he wants to buy NVIDIA time to catch up because they are still lagging in Quantum due to focusing on AI. What Jensen did was a dick move, but business world is cut throat. Quantum is inevitable, sooner than Jensen expects and people who are educated know this, the problem is majority of investors are not educated on emerging tech they are near sighted so their investments are also near sighted.
This isn't about Quantum Computing "not being ready", this is about Jensen's job security Nvidia did it in five years, Quantum will do it in three (or less)
@@NewYorkGiants012 multiple companies are already using the technology including the largest banks and automotive companies. Nvidia alone is actively hiring people in the field with ads put up as soon as 2 days ago. I can't speak on why he said what he said, but one could assume he did it in an effort to outweigh the risks of his own job security
@@edwinyangtw ChatGPT 4o: "Long-Term (10+ years): Practical, universal quantum computers capable of solving a wide variety of problems at a scale and reliability that outperforms classical computers may become a reality. This could include disrupting fields like cryptography (potentially breaking existing encryption algorithms) and solving problems in material science, artificial intelligence, and beyond."
Not sure, if anyone understood Jensen. He clearly mentioned QC to do better with empirical non-data driven problem solving. Currently how many qubit stability is achievable and for how long. The capabilities are just extrapolated and exagerrated, due to the parallel nature of QC. That said, who thought a GPT LLM could mimic intelligence after digesting the entire internet data?. So, there is a real possibility for QC to succeed, IIF they achieve extreme stability and predictability of qubits for several hours, instead of fraction of few hundredth of seconds. Who thought gene editing possible before CRISPR happened?. Just some 💭
As someone affiliated with one of the leading QC firms, I can confidently assert that the advancements in QC set to emerge by the end of March will be groundbreaking, especially from two of the 'Magnificent Seven' companies. While I encourage thorough research and understanding before making investment or business decisions, it is worth noting the far-reaching implications of these development, particularly regarding material scarcity and the transformative role QC could play in global power dynamics. To Jensen's remarks, they are not surprising, given his emphasis on non-quantum related innovations, not to mention he had just announced some of his products hours before, but they underscore the seismic impact quantum technology will have. Not only in industries but also in areas like national security and geopolitical stability. The future holds immense potential but QC is here and there is no next for QC, it is already.
@@Kelvin-ed6ce Quantum Cybersecurity is a thing and China has been on that for a while so you can bet the US gov't will want to enter Quantum Cybersecurity, as it is literally unhackable, and companies like Quantum eMotion and others are offering Quantum Cybersecurity RIGHT NOW. Rigetti sold dozens of their quantum computers to Amazon for their AWS Braket service and to Microsoft for their Quantum Azure service, so the problem isnt quantum computers its the lack of mass adoption and the reason Jensen Huang talked negatively about Quantum is to prevent mass adoption for as long as possible until NVIDIA is ready to enter the Quantum industry.
To be fair with Jensen, if he belived quantum was here and a real threat, he could buy all those quantum stocks, which have a combined market cap of 10-20bn. Nvidia is worth 3tn…
QBTS is coming for everyone. Jensen is scared. This is the stock to buy. Excellent opportunity. All Jensen did is allow people to buy these companies real cheap
An analyst that says he understands what these companies do is in the wrong line of work because if he really understood what they did and was able to explain it without using key performance metric buzz words, he’d be working for the company that he’s covering
I'm analyzing stocks in this industry as well. I am a seasoned IT major. Does that mean I need to work at one of the quantum computing companies to understand how this technology will exponentially change the entire world. The quantum hardware is there. For these companies to earn more, they need to develop software that IT professionals can interact with the QPUs without a steep learning curve. Monetarily quantum computing profits won't reach their potential until that part is developed. These QPUs are completely different than CPUs. Easiest example I can give you is that you can't run Windows 11 on it because Win 11 doesn't have the capability of understanding the hardware to bridge the hardware and software together. If anyone says we're 10 years out and doesn't explain why, then their estimate should hold no merit. Also, it's not an easy question to answer. Top notch IT specialists have the capability to utilize it today, but requires a HUGE learning curve. To make them available to a wide range of IT professionals, we're probably 5 years out, but enterprises need to make sure it fits their budget and quantum is the best solution for their use-case. Everyday people will probably use apps and stuff that are developed to send difficult processing stuff to the quantum cloud and receive the answer back... these are probably 10 years out, but the government and other IT security organizations need to get on top of this because encryption is in danger and your regular CPUs can't hold up to the exponential increase of CPU power needed to process that OR they might not be capable at all. Side note: AWS and Azure have had the ability to rent quantum computing time with Rigetti, D-Wave, and IONQ. So that's a big reason why I'm saying 5 years for a WIDE use-case across IT. If you understand how huge AWS and Azure is for the IT world, then you'll understand why this is a big deal
AI is great... but do you know that Quantum is what's going to drive AI in the future. You can't have AI without Quantum but for Quantum you don't need AI.
LIAR LIAR- it’s warranted, you’re nervous, David, just be honest about what has happened, it does not mean there is not potential nor does it mean there is not opportunity or risk but all of this defense from you and from the CEO of one of these companies in addition to many others has only raised the bar all that much higher I hope you take this as constructive criticismYou seem absolutely flabbergasted, nervous, stuttering, and uncomposed when delivering this response, and it instills a sense of duplicity amongst all your other coverings of all other companies, and it makes me think less of your work when you are not honest about a situation such as this.
ChatGPT 4o: "Long-Term (10+ years): Practical, universal quantum computers capable of solving a wide variety of problems at a scale and reliability that outperforms classical computers may become a reality. This could include disrupting fields like cryptography (potentially breaking existing encryption algorithms) and solving problems in material science, artificial intelligence, and beyond."
I've been seeing a lot of people talk about stocks with growth potential, but honestly, it's been tough for me to make those picks. If you have any recommendations, I would really appreciate it!
I think the safest strategy is to diversify investments. But if you need proper advice, consider speaking with a financial expertise. Don't get me wrong, you can do it on your own, but financial advisors have a lot more knowledge and expertise in this area because some time ago, I started out investing on my own and lost quite a bit. But after the 2020 crash, I managed to pull out about $160k. I then invested that money with an analyst, and in just seven months, I made almost $1m. It's amazing how having the right guidance can turn things around
I looked for the name online and found his page. I would say he really has an impressive background in investing, Thanks for the help and I will emailed him right away and make inquiries
Jensen trying to slow down quantum computing so he can sale his supercomputer racks for longer is understandable.....annoying , but understandable...
Exactly. Think about the bigger picture too. He's holding back the advancement of the entire world if he is only money driven. He should do the right thing and make one of these companies a realistic offer so he's not holding the entire world back from their potential and instead help to fund the advancement of our society.
I think it's important to stick to stocks that are immune to economic policies. AI stocks that have the potential to power and transform future technologies. It seems AI is the trajectory most companies are taking, including even established FAANG companies. Maybe there are other recommendations?
I bought into NVIDIA around September last year because my financial advisor recommended it to me. She said the company is selling shovels in a gold rush. It accounted for almost 80% of my market return this year.
@@MercuriosBakers That's a great analogy and I love the insight. Professionals could make a really big difference in investing, and I think everyone should have one. There are aspects of market trends that are difficult for the untrained eyes to see.
@@FarukStingl I will be happy to receive assistance and glad to have someone help me, but how can one spot a reputable one?
@@CharliesMcCormicks There are many independent advisors to choose from. But I work with MARGARET MOLLI ALVEY and we've been working together for almost four years and she's fantastic. You could pursue her if she meets your requirements. I agree with her.
@@FarukStingl Thank you for this Pointer. It was easy to find your handler, She seems very proficient and flexible.
Quantum is literally here . He lied
@@bampoe8670 Jensen is trying to prevent mass adoption of Quantum technology, he wants to buy NVIDIA time to catch up because they are still lagging in Quantum due to focusing on AI. What Jensen did was a dick move, but business world is cut throat. Quantum is inevitable, sooner than Jensen expects and people who are educated know this, the problem is majority of investors are not educated on emerging tech they are near sighted so their investments are also near sighted.
Chips in the Thousands of qubits??? Yeah, SURE!!
Thanks for posting on IONQ! 👍🏼
Buy the dip
D-wave too?
If people are talking about it it means there’s interest and potential 🎉
People take about cold fusion…. Interest, yes! Potential? No…
When they sell we BUY 🎉
I need more money to buy! Send me a million dollars please, thanks :)
This isn't about Quantum Computing "not being ready", this is about Jensen's job security
Nvidia did it in five years, Quantum will do it in three (or less)
What evidence do you have for 3....
@@NewYorkGiants012 multiple companies are already using the technology including the largest banks and automotive companies. Nvidia alone is actively hiring people in the field with ads put up as soon as 2 days ago. I can't speak on why he said what he said, but one could assume he did it in an effort to outweigh the risks of his own job security
Ask ChatGPT, and you will see that, although he is not 100% correct, some points are valid.
@@Chad_Max he's also funded by Nancy Pelosi, they could be playing everyone like a politician
@@edwinyangtw ChatGPT 4o: "Long-Term (10+ years): Practical, universal quantum computers capable of solving a wide variety of problems at a scale and reliability that outperforms classical computers may become a reality. This could include disrupting fields like cryptography (potentially breaking existing encryption algorithms) and solving problems in material science, artificial intelligence, and beyond."
Not sure, if anyone understood Jensen. He clearly mentioned QC to do better with empirical non-data driven problem solving. Currently how many qubit stability is achievable and for how long. The capabilities are just extrapolated and exagerrated, due to the parallel nature of QC. That said, who thought a GPT LLM could mimic intelligence after digesting the entire internet data?.
So, there is a real possibility for QC to succeed, IIF they achieve extreme stability and predictability of qubits for several hours, instead of fraction of few hundredth of seconds. Who thought gene editing possible before CRISPR happened?. Just some 💭
People dont understand the science behind QC and curent limitations, They are just hurt that QC stock are down due to truth about the state of QC.
Quantum is there and Quantum companies are posting huge profits:) buy some and wait until 2030
As someone affiliated with one of the leading QC firms, I can confidently assert that the advancements in QC set to emerge by the end of March will be groundbreaking, especially from two of the 'Magnificent Seven' companies. While I encourage thorough research and understanding before making investment or business decisions, it is worth noting the far-reaching implications of these development, particularly regarding material scarcity and the transformative role QC could play in global power dynamics. To Jensen's remarks, they are not surprising, given his emphasis on non-quantum related innovations, not to mention he had just announced some of his products hours before, but they underscore the seismic impact quantum technology will have. Not only in industries but also in areas like national security and geopolitical stability. The future holds immense potential but QC is here and there is no next for QC, it is already.
hmm... you sure?
@@Kelvin-ed6ce Quantum Cybersecurity is a thing and China has been on that for a while so you can bet the US gov't will want to enter Quantum Cybersecurity, as it is literally unhackable, and companies like Quantum eMotion and others are offering Quantum Cybersecurity RIGHT NOW. Rigetti sold dozens of their quantum computers to Amazon for their AWS Braket service and to Microsoft for their Quantum Azure service, so the problem isnt quantum computers its the lack of mass adoption and the reason Jensen Huang talked negatively about Quantum is to prevent mass adoption for as long as possible until NVIDIA is ready to enter the Quantum industry.
If it isn’t error correction, it isn’t groundbreaking.
If you don’t think he sold at the top and bought at the bottom, you’re insane
To be fair with Jensen, if he belived quantum was here and a real threat, he could buy all those quantum stocks, which have a combined market cap of 10-20bn. Nvidia is worth 3tn…
would you sell the family run restaurant for cents on the dollar when you know it could become the next big McDonald's?
These are the stock for future. Just holding it for now.
jingsum is shorting quantum stocks. LOAD UP🚀🚀🚀
QBTS is coming for everyone. Jensen is scared. This is the stock to buy. Excellent opportunity. All Jensen did is allow people to buy these companies real cheap
They sell we buy🎉🥂💰
Not a sell off just the market is down why don’t people learn
An analyst that says he understands what these companies do is in the wrong line of work because if he really understood what they did and was able to explain it without using key performance metric buzz words, he’d be working for the company that he’s covering
I'm analyzing stocks in this industry as well. I am a seasoned IT major. Does that mean I need to work at one of the quantum computing companies to understand how this technology will exponentially change the entire world. The quantum hardware is there. For these companies to earn more, they need to develop software that IT professionals can interact with the QPUs without a steep learning curve. Monetarily quantum computing profits won't reach their potential until that part is developed. These QPUs are completely different than CPUs. Easiest example I can give you is that you can't run Windows 11 on it because Win 11 doesn't have the capability of understanding the hardware to bridge the hardware and software together.
If anyone says we're 10 years out and doesn't explain why, then their estimate should hold no merit. Also, it's not an easy question to answer. Top notch IT specialists have the capability to utilize it today, but requires a HUGE learning curve. To make them available to a wide range of IT professionals, we're probably 5 years out, but enterprises need to make sure it fits their budget and quantum is the best solution for their use-case. Everyday people will probably use apps and stuff that are developed to send difficult processing stuff to the quantum cloud and receive the answer back... these are probably 10 years out, but the government and other IT security organizations need to get on top of this because encryption is in danger and your regular CPUs can't hold up to the exponential increase of CPU power needed to process that OR they might not be capable at all.
Side note: AWS and Azure have had the ability to rent quantum computing time with Rigetti, D-Wave, and IONQ. So that's a big reason why I'm saying 5 years for a WIDE use-case across IT. If you understand how huge AWS and Azure is for the IT world, then you'll understand why this is a big deal
AI is great... but do you know that Quantum is what's going to drive AI in the future. You can't have AI without Quantum but for Quantum you don't need AI.
LIAR LIAR- it’s warranted, you’re nervous, David, just be honest about what has happened, it does not mean there is not potential nor does it mean there is not opportunity or risk but all of this defense from you and from the CEO of one of these companies in addition to many others has only raised the bar all that much higher I hope you take this as constructive criticismYou seem absolutely flabbergasted, nervous, stuttering, and uncomposed when delivering this response, and it instills a sense of duplicity amongst all your other coverings of all other companies, and it makes me think less of your work when you are not honest about a situation such as this.
“Hwang”
“Hwillow”
Canadian news is very much junior varsity.
Lost 50% in one day and I bought it excately at the top😂😂😂
He seems lost a lot of clients money
He should if he’s recommending quantum computing at these levels.
When asked what IONQ does, the guy can hardly explain what they do 😂
ChatGPT 4o: "Long-Term (10+ years): Practical, universal quantum computers capable of solving a wide variety of problems at a scale and reliability that outperforms classical computers may become a reality. This could include disrupting fields like cryptography (potentially breaking existing encryption algorithms) and solving problems in material science, artificial intelligence, and beyond."
Keyword being *may* !!! And no time soon.
When Doomberg ask to Buy something you sell 😂
Jensen needs to bem sueded
was a megabubble of speculation, Ponzi scheme 😂😂😂😂
And you’ve contradicted yourself… then you just drop buzzwords when asked what they do….
I've been seeing a lot of people talk about stocks with growth potential, but honestly, it's been tough for me to make those picks. If you have any recommendations, I would really appreciate it!
I think the safest strategy is to diversify investments. But if you need proper advice, consider speaking with a financial expertise. Don't get me wrong, you can do it on your own, but financial advisors have a lot more knowledge and expertise in this area because some time ago, I started out investing on my own and lost quite a bit. But after the 2020 crash, I managed to pull out about $160k. I then invested that money with an analyst, and in just seven months, I made almost $1m. It's amazing how having the right guidance can turn things around
This is incredible. Could you pls recommend your FA? I really could use some help at this moment
I looked for the name online and found his page. I would say he really has an impressive background in investing, Thanks for the help and I will emailed him right away and make inquiries
This is horseshit
Why?
Every video that I have seen them interview quantum analysis or ceo… all thier face say it all! Seem Jensen have exposed the fake company 🤣