I applaud the response by CEO Alan Baratz. He was very respectful towards Jensen, but was very efficient at explaining the current commercialization of their quantum product. The interviewer is disrespectful and attempting to stir the interview in Jensen’s favour.
We must have watched different videos. Where did he efficiently explain the commercialization exactly? He did some name dropping, named a few companies, but did not mention how they're using quantum tech.
Rigetti also has product being sold TODAY, not just D-Wave. AWS and Microsoft bought Rigetti's quantum computers. Unfortunately, nobody will listen to these companies unless Google defends Willow and the rest of the Quantum Industry, but im sure Google has a lot of business with NVIDIA so likely they wont be vocal on this subject.
@@r0gue15 is spot on, and unfortunately the author of the original comment is very misinformed. There is no company that has ever benefited commercially from any quantum computer or quantum annealer, and Alan is just lying through his teeth or doesn't know squat about the field. The interviewer knows more than him because she properly did her research, and she called him out.
The FACT: Quantum computer is euphemistically called: multiple simultaneous operations beyond 0 and 1, But in fact, from the perspective of Gen AI's large language DNN model or the neural network architecture of human physiology, for each neural operation, only Y or N is needed (to take this neural route or not to take this) In other words, the world of 0s and 1s is very suitable for home or cloud computing purposes, but quantum computers that exceed the multiple simultaneous operations of 0s and 1s are prohibitively expensive. My personal interpretation of NVIDIA's Jason Huang said that in 20 years, it is actually It means that it is cheap enough for everyone to buy it. If it can be bought for US$2,000, about 20% of households in the world can buy or rent this quantum computer service. But it will take 20 years for it to be so cheap. !
Jensen is an electrical engineering major like myself. Alan is a computer science major. They are two distinct fields with some overlapping areas. Neither is wrong. Both are talking within their realms of expertise (i.e. hardware vs software). Asking these morons from CNBC to moderate an intellectual conversation about quantum computing is beyond their scope.
Huge props to D-Wave for sticking up for quantum. Someone needed to respond to NVidia as boldly as Huang's comments disrupted the quantum field and I think Alan did a great job.
@matt.stevick anyone that's actually researched Alan's history and work trusts him. So many just want YT to spoon feed them opinions without evidence and facts hey Matt
This guy is being intentionally misleading to protect his stock, and the only way his company doesn't plummet in value is if he continues to do this and he knows it. He completely fails to mention the only reason his companies technology is commercially available today is because it's not actually quantum computing but another much easier to build (and much less valuable) system called a quantum annealer. He is going to take naive people's money for his own gain. Alan if you're reading this, you know that the scientists in this field can't stand guys like you. You are very selfish.
They do this all the freaking time. All of their analysts push Apple like it's a default winner in every category when they have become the least interesting company of the Mag 7.
Yes, that seems to be the case. Jim Cramer is clearly Nvidia's biggest fan-or perhaps a close ally of Jensen Huang. It’s likely the same for many at CNBC, and there’s nothing inherently wrong with that. However, quantum computing is advancing rapidly. The CEO of D-Wave is no novice-he’s an MIT PhD, and most leaders in quantum computing have Ivy League credentials and years of experience at top companies.
As someone affiliated with one of the leading QC firms, I can confidently assert that the advancements in QC set to emerge by the end of March will be groundbreaking, especially from two of the 'Magnificent Seven' companies. While I encourage thorough research and understanding before making investment or business decisions, it is worth noting the far-reaching implications of these development, particularly regarding material scarcity and the transformative role QC could play in global power dynamics. To Jensen's remarks, they are not surprising, given his emphasis on non-quantum related innovations, not to mention he had just announced some of his products hours before, but they underscore the seismic impact quantum technology will have. Not only in industries but also in areas like national security and geopolitical stability. The future holds immense potential but QC is here and there is no next for QC, it is already.
@@homme436 Please keep in mind that I am not a financial analyst. Personally, I would invest in IonQ, IBM and Honeywell for a year, and not worry about the market fluctuations.
@@homme436 Please keep in mind that I am not a financial analyst. Personally, I would invest in IonQ, IBM and Honeywell for a year, and not worry about the market fluctuations.
Cool, so that's one of the advancements out of 5 or 6 that Jensen said before QC will be useful. March will only bring you 1 order of magnitude closer.
Wow. You know her too? I lost a lot of money as a beginner until I saw Mrs Alana Ringberg on CNBC. She's been managing my portfolio with good returns and I appreciate her sincerity and genuine services
Wow Alana has been managing my investment. All I do is sit at home and make withdrawals every week without any knowledge of trading. She does everything by herself
I fell off my chair when Diedre asked Alan why his company is not valued as an AI company. Does she even know the difference between AI and Quantum Computing before she came here to pose questions?
I'm not defending her, but i believe her question was phrased as: why is your profitability not like an AI company. Better worded possibly as: if this technology is so much better (not arguing that it isn't) then why does your QC company appear to be in financial decline? Obviously there are many reasons why completely unrelated to the feasibility and/ or superiority of either technology.
@@thamilton1218that’s not even a correct way to phrase playing devils advocate because AI is NOT profitable right now. As I understand, PLtR is the only one actually making profit from AI. The rest are burning cash. . . so you even got the hypothetical wrong lol
It was a fair question. Alan is falsely claiming that D-Wave can compete with AI companies. Also, a quantum computer should be able to do anything that a classical computer can do, only faster, so if his company is so good, then it should be more profitable than any AI company. Her question was therefore 100% relevant. You have no business questioning her knowledge when you are "falling off your chair" when you hear completely reasonable questions.
@NikeDattani I'll be the judge of what (not) to do when I fall off my chair with none of your assistance. First of all, AI and Quantum are 2 different sects despite being part of tech space. If one is the process the other is the processor. AI had all these years of precedent Big Data and cloud maturity behind it to finally make sense of what data can deliver to consumers and how tech companies can leverage it should they have the drive. Quantum, on the other hand, is hardware - in the most nascent stage of its development to get a lot more of it right before it becomes a mass market product which I have confidence in the current crop of companies to achieve. Stay patient, intuitive instead of getting carried away of what people say
He seemed extremely defensive..those are terrible optics. He avoided the question about Q3 drop in revenue (should have addressed that) and should have just been straightforward saying we are working on x,y and z and expect revenues to increase substantially over the next few quarters. He undoubtedly is brilliant but he needs to learn how to verbalize his argumetns in such a way as to not come across as flippant or demeaning.
From all these companies IonQ was the only real one with revenue and 80% of their income is from a government airforce contract. Even alphabet, who literally set off this rally with willow, said its at least 10 years away.
it will definitely be useful when it crosses a certain threshold or if we find a different use case, but right now it's just a really fast car in a world with no roads
As I had already hands-on the D-Wave quantum annealers and I am using it for solving NP problems applicable in real life like e.g. autonomous vehicle motion planning, I can agree - it is now, today, commercially usable and I am looking forward the new Zephyr topology 🤞🏻 and everybody here commenting should first learn the difference between QPU which NVIDIA is using or IBM, Google are developing (the general quantum gate-based computer) and the D-Wave Systems Quantum ANNEALER.
You are lying about solving vehicle motion planning on an annealer. You are solving Micky Mouse versions of it on an annealer, but real commercial versions of it will be done faster on a cell phone chip.
@@QuanTessla name-dropping a famous car company that spends 0.0000001% of their budget playing around with quantum toys for publicity, doesn't give quantum computing credibility to real scientists.
@NikeDattani name dropping their customer who have proven real world success. You haven't been around business long if you don't understand proving your concept , showcasing your skills, proving success is more crucial than pricing in the early days. Pricing will come when they continue to prove their successes as they have done in every segment and sector they've penetrated so far. Keep providing your lazy bear thesis I'm trying to find someone with any actual substance in their bear case but as such no substance still !
please 🙏 never come in cnbc comments and speak poorly of dierdre again unless warranted. she’s incredibly talented and deserves her flowers. your problem is yourself. learn more, and do your homework. this trade will be a lesson for you, you can easily turn it into a positive for your path forward. good luck.
@@HOPE4u00 Then Jensen would buy the company dumbo. NVDA makes more revenue in 5 minutes than these companies make in a year. Anyone of value would have been bought by Google Microsoft Nvidia Amazon whomever. They all are vaporware jokes.
I have a feeling that Jensen said something that might not be entirely true. This is just my personal opinion-not because I think he lied, but because I feel he’s trying to protect and prioritize his own interests in Nvidia. It’s something anyone in his position might do.
I feel investors should focus on under-the-radar stocks, considering the current rollercoaster nature of the stock market, Because 35% of my $270k portfolio comprises plummeting stocks that were once revered. I don't know where to go here out of devastation.
Find quality stocks that have long term potential, and ride with those stocks. I have found it takes someone who is very familiar with the market to make such good picks.
Yes. It is very easy to buy in on trending stocks but the problem is knowing when to sell or hold, which is why a coach is important. I've been in touch with one for about a year now and although I was initially skeptical about it, I will say I've made more progress within a year generating 6figure profit
My CFA, Laurel Ann Watkins, is a renowned figure in her field. I recommend researching her name online; you’ll find all her credentials and everything you need to work with a reliable professional. With many years of experience, she is a valuable resource for anyone looking to navigate the financial market.
Thanks for sharing. I curiously searched for her full name and her website popped up immediately. I looked through her credentials and did my due diligence before contacting her.
Hopefully his interview gives the quantum sector some hope and reprisal for Friday's trading. A lot of folks got slammed when their q positions tanked due to Jensen's comment. I don't have any skin in the game but I hate seeing the pain those guys must be feeling rn.
@sidneywallace406 I'm trying to share as much as I can. Showed this video to my trading discord where theres a few with skin in the game hoping they hang in there as you should too. Best of luck
Jensen was within his rights with the comment, but he was commenting on an unknown variable--that being how many entities are working on quantum and where they're at. Quantum already has proven uses. I'm still at a loss as to why he'd make such a comment.
At least someone who has the ball the ball to stand up and tell something to Jensen who has no business downgrading other companies by nasty talk .selfishness
If anyone were to be capable of reading, Jensen said “very useful quantum computers” were 20 years off. To be “very useful” these computers would need to be manufactured at scale, have deep, proven libraries of developmental and supportive software with millions of developers well versed in the technology, would need to solve many problems existing today such as error correction and would need to maintain its effectiveness against advancements in current accelerated computing trends offering 1,000,000x performance gains per decade and AI performance is increasing at even faster rate. Quantum computers will absolutely make waves and change the world in some ways, but there’s infinitely more to worry about beyond producing a piece of hardware
I wonder who initially asked Jensen Huang that question, or if he was perhaps influenced by short sellers to speak critically about quantum computing. It’s worth noting that quantum computing stocks have experienced noticeably high short interest, a significant number of failures-to-deliver (FTDs) in recent months, and extremely high borrowing fees.
Lol dude, we haven’t even figured out how to fact check our quantum data yet - as in the results themselves can’t even be verified, so in theory it could just be an error (I’m mostly referring to the Willow “breakthrough”)… How can you fault the guy for making a statement like that? Make no mistake, these are speculative stocks, and even if we aren’t 30 years away like Jensen says, we’re at least more than 5
@@User-ow7biI have a sinister degenerate thought, includes your favorite rollercoaster AI retail stock... Palantir. He mentioned optimization almost like thats the light workside of their present day executable capabilities. So now my noodles getting wet wondering if this is a company setting itself up to seriously take market share for defense, public administration, healthcare, etc contracts. Maybe Im thinking to big or maybe company's like Salesforce or Snowflake just got leapfrogged.
@@acoop9865 That's a non sequitur argument. Google is really far behind and we're talking about breaking Bitcoin in 2027. If the private key works, do you really need to *also* run a check in quantum algorithm? classical verification for NISQ computation
It was a question regarding short term outlook. in optimistic cases thy will be profitable in 5 years and they are running out of cash in two quartals by there earnings so s far )=
This reporter should get her fact straight and learn about AI and Quantum Mechanics so she can construct good questions when it comes to Quantum Computing or the technology
fact is they never have been profitable. Should they just let him tell all people he made fat racks already with quantum as he tried and when he gets called out he changes his statement to we going to be profitable soon. Thats cap and needs to be called out
I’m buying more D-Wave and selling all NVDA… As an electrical engineer … I respect what D-Wave CEO said, his belief, and his mission… Trust me quantum has a bright future.. I have done 5 years of my own research … And what he is saying is true and resonates with my finding and beyond… when NVDA CEO partners with DWave is when I’ll buy NVDA again. I don’t think they would have a choice … The proof is in the pudding..😂
quantum AI is the next thing and everyone should pay close attention NVIDIA has no foundation for quantum computing. They are still in the 80's mindset
Jensen, Jim Cramer, Federal Reserve, when these people speak, the market goes down. Jensen was over his head when he spoke negative about Quantum. He has too much money and he forgot where he came from.
@PathsOfValor jensen doesn't have the Physicists background that have patent protected their work to the hilt. He can join the gated race with every other man and his dog
@@Sam-lp3bm If it goes down then up it's a dip. 3 major companies finished higher on Wednesday than the lowest point of the session. We will see what happens in the next few days and weeks.
Some analysts believe Huang's remarks were self-serving, as Nvidia is a major player in the AI and traditional computing sectors. By downplaying the immediate potential of quantum computing, Huang might be aiming to maintain investor confidence in Nvidia's current technologies and stock.
This issue is you talking heads calling him an authority. Huang is no longer the top dog and knows he is late to the party. Would not be surprised if Nvidia is looking to buy a quantum tech company and purposely drove the price down
@@jb-zl8cf NVDA have tried to purchase RGTI and had to settle for partnership. Then if you search they have CURRENTLY a huge recruitment drive on for quantum engineers 💀 not gonna take the SEC long to figure this one out lmao
He's not wrong; Quantum is a non factor until they can be utilized in PCs; Quantum PC. Nothing wrong with it; just keep developing, you have customers but are you profitable?
The biggest lesson I learned in 2024 about the stock market is that nobody knows what will happen next, so practice some humility and low a strategy with a long-term edge.
Nobody knows anything; You need to create your process, manage risk, and stick to the plan, through thick or thin, While also continuously learning from mistakes and improving.
@@JacobReynolds-t7v True, initially I wasn't quite impressed with my gains, as opposed to my previous performances, I was doing so badly, that I figured I needed to diversify into better assets, I touched base with a portfolio advisor, and that same year, I pulled a net gain of 550k...that's like 7times more than I average on my own.
@@LucaMurgia-j7b I've shuffled through investment coaches; they can positively impact an individual's portfolio. But do your due diligence to find a coach with grit that withstood the 2008 crash. MARGARET MOLLI ALVEY was better and smarter than all the advisors I have ever worked with. I’ve never met anyone with as much conviction.
Wow she's in way over her head unless they were intentionally trying to steer conversation. So weird and unprofessional. And im a huge Nvidia fan and investor but this interview was terrible.
Is Deirdre that stupid or she is just playing dumb ? Alan said he was wrong about the benefit timing 30 years from today when Alan said companies are benefiting today . Some similarities about Quantum and AI but not all equal. To summarize it .
What were Amazon's quarterlies for the first five years? What AI company quarterlies at the onset when everyone was terrified that they were going to take over the world?
Amazon had no profits but they had high revenue. These guys have very low revenue... it's okay not to have profits or if you're a research outfit just be honest and say you're still in development, but you can't say TODAY and then show no revenue. That being said he couldn't explain why revenue last quarter was low.
As an investment enthusiast, I often wonder how top-level investors are able to become millionaires through investing. I have a significant amount of capital to start with, but I'm unsure about the strategies and direct I should take to help me generate substantial profits like some people are this season.
Factos!!. After experiencing a major portfolio loss in 2020 amid the COVID pandemic while trying to manage my investments on my own, I reached out to an investment advisor. They helped me turn my $420k into a seven-figure portfolio by providing the guidance and strategy I needed. Having that expertise made a significant difference in my investment journey.
Thanks for sharing your experience! I’ve been managing my portfolio myself, but it’s not working out. Do you have any recommendations for a good investment advisor? I could really use some help.
Nikki Leigh Brooks is a highly respected figure in her field. I suggest delving deeper into her credentials, as she possesses extensive experience and serves as a valuable resource for individuals seeking guidance in navigating the financial market.
Thank you so much for the suggestion! I really needed it. I looked her up on Google and explored her website; she has an impressive background in investments. I've sent her an email, and I hope to hear back from her soon!
Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought Jensen's new thesis on his company was quantum computing since AI was no longer helping? I remember he uttered quantum computing on his earnings or a press conference and now he's backtracking?
He's not backtracking, he's investing in QC research and foundational work like many companies, this will just take years to mature and be a real business. It's just logical.
D-wave doesn't make universal quantum computers. They make a hardware that computes specific quantum optimization algorithm. I don't think Jensen was talking about this kind of device.
There is no financial basis for these quantum companies to have their valuation gone up by 100-500 times since the announcement of willow. The market correction is quite justified
Exactly, anyone who bothered to learn anything about quantum and looked at the company fundamentals would have seen that coming. The sell off WAS going to happen the only question was WHEN.
There isn't alot of nuance, the interviewer is either not listening, doesn't understand the words given to her (annealing vs. gate-based systems), or was told to tow the Jensen/Nvidia line. Baratz made it clear, Quantum is solving problems today. Let's get he and Jensen on a stage for a sit down. Jensen gaslit the quantum industry.
Title should be "D Wave CEO attempts to deny reality". Quantum stocks are pump and dumps with no path to profitability for next decades. Nothing Jensen said is suprising. Academics / scientists have been laughing at the quantum stocks that r being pumped by idiots.
As this is the way how Nvidia CEO treat his partners. I'm afraid of his relation to other partners than IONQ. Yes despite his very biaised declaration Nvidia was listed as partner of IONQ on IONQ website.. What a shame for him...such a claim is a sign of fear about Quantum revolution.
Too much of optimization on Quantum computing like done a simulation in 5 secs which would take classical computer about to take 1 septillion years ., this is not a joke. You are closing exponential jobs out of industries. Too much of anything above optimum is not good
you're right actually, philosophically speaking; example: water. 'pure' water is quite toxic if ingested. the one we drink (with all the natural impurities/minerals/salts) is ok.
The FACT: Quantum computer is euphemistically called: multiple simultaneous operations beyond 0 and 1, But in fact, from the perspective of Gen AI's large language DNN model or the neural network architecture of human physiology, for each neural operation, only Y or N is needed (to take this neural route or not to take this) In other words, the world of 0s and 1s is very suitable for home or cloud computing purposes, but quantum computers that exceed the multiple simultaneous operations of 0s and 1s are prohibitively expensive. My personal interpretation of NVIDIA's Jason Huang said that in 20 years, it is actually It means that it is cheap enough for everyone to buy it. If it can be bought for US$2,000, about 20% of households in the world can buy or rent this quantum computer service. But it will take 20 years for it to be so cheap. !
Sucks that one man can say one thing that isn’t a fully educated comment and be able to crash markets. They shots be held responsible to a point. Having a position of power like he does he shouldn’t be allowed to publicize his opinion unless he’s 100% accurate
So you have a 20 giga watt future quantum computer that evolves a heuristic oracle for mini super computers with quantum compute units. Point being quantum computers can make lesser systems more optimal.
Most of the comments here don't know that companies like these don't have serious revenues and won't for several years because they simply invest them in their technology. How can you be "investors" and have an opinion when you don't know the basics? Is a company, QBTS, judged by its revenues? Keep doing it but I hope investments don't have these criteria. Some of the comments seem like trolls.
Makes no sense. Revenue vs income. Revenue doesn’t go down just because you invest the money you make back into the business unless you meant to say income. 3rd quarter revuene is 1M, like some people in the comments mentioned. , some liquor stores make that much money. The stock tanked, that’s why the ceo is out there trying to make a show. They are dependent on the stock price to maybe sell stocks to keep them a float.
My Take, I think Deadra Bosa probably had the backs of Investors here - including mine. CEO Alan Baratz appears to be overemphasizing results by distracting Investors with technical language representing insignificant revenue accomplishments. D-Wave is losing money and burning cash to the point of being insolvent this year, per publicly reported information. Ms Bosa, thank you for having the courage to confront probable misleading double-speak. Patrick McInturff
OMG this interviewer is not the right person for this interview, she doesnt even understand what she is talking about, they couldnt understand each other at the end
Asked chatbox AI: in summary quantum computing is available in experimental forms. Its practical applications for broader audiences will likely evolve over the next decade or two
Hope this is the time to get the cheapest price QC stocks. Jensen Huang (CEO of NVidia), Your Cry on QC for last 3 months would be satisfied by buying 1 triliaon QC stocks. Please do it now.
Now that both Jensen and Zuck have commented about the tech being a decade plus away, it could be an effort to stall quantum computers having to be replaced by typewriters...maybe?
It is nice to see a journalist actually ask hard questions...but I think she is a bit harsh with the future reality of quantum cpmputing - I am into $ QTUM and will stay there.
Jenson's comments were purely self-serving. Invidia is lagging behind in this area and so he had to throw Quantam companies under the bus so that Invidia remains the leader. Investors were some what disappointed of his presentation and were expecting him to reveal something more spectacular than what he presented like a quantam chip and so he had to tell people that is not possible at the moment.
I applaud the response by CEO Alan Baratz. He was very respectful towards Jensen, but was very efficient at explaining the current commercialization of their quantum product. The interviewer is disrespectful and attempting to stir the interview in Jensen’s favour.
We must have watched different videos. Where did he efficiently explain the commercialization exactly? He did some name dropping, named a few companies, but did not mention how they're using quantum tech.
Rigetti also has product being sold TODAY, not just D-Wave. AWS and Microsoft bought Rigetti's quantum computers. Unfortunately, nobody will listen to these companies unless Google defends Willow and the rest of the Quantum Industry, but im sure Google has a lot of business with NVIDIA so likely they wont be vocal on this subject.
@@r0gue15 is spot on, and unfortunately the author of the original comment is very misinformed. There is no company that has ever benefited commercially from any quantum computer or quantum annealer, and Alan is just lying through his teeth or doesn't know squat about the field. The interviewer knows more than him because she properly did her research, and she called him out.
The FACT:
Quantum computer is euphemistically called: multiple simultaneous operations beyond 0 and 1,
But in fact, from the perspective of Gen AI's large language DNN model or the neural network architecture of human physiology, for each neural operation, only Y or N is needed (to take this neural route or not to take this)
In other words, the world of 0s and 1s is very suitable for home or cloud computing purposes, but quantum computers that exceed the multiple simultaneous operations of 0s and 1s are prohibitively expensive. My personal interpretation of NVIDIA's Jason Huang said that in 20 years, it is actually It means that it is cheap enough for everyone to buy it. If it can be bought for US$2,000, about 20% of households in the world can buy or rent this quantum computer service. But it will take 20 years for it to be so cheap. !
Jensen is an electrical engineering major like myself. Alan is a computer science major. They are two distinct fields with some overlapping areas. Neither is wrong. Both are talking within their realms of expertise (i.e. hardware vs software). Asking these morons from CNBC to moderate an intellectual conversation about quantum computing is beyond their scope.
I think Jensen tried to say that it takes years before QC companies make profits.
@@napoleonbonaparte4396or it will take quantum computer companies 15-20 years to have something that is worth trillions.
Lmao imagine using someone’s university major to judge their scope of expertise. No way you’re that dense 💀
We need to get them all on lex Friedman
@@carsbyjmo you are probably why more people need to stay in school
Huge props to D-Wave for sticking up for quantum. Someone needed to respond to NVidia as boldly as Huang's comments disrupted the quantum field and I think Alan did a great job.
@matt.stevick anyone that's actually researched Alan's history and work trusts him. So many just want YT to spoon feed them opinions without evidence and facts hey Matt
This guy is being intentionally misleading to protect his stock, and the only way his company doesn't plummet in value is if he continues to do this and he knows it. He completely fails to mention the only reason his companies technology is commercially available today is because it's not actually quantum computing but another much easier to build (and much less valuable) system called a quantum annealer. He is going to take naive people's money for his own gain. Alan if you're reading this, you know that the scientists in this field can't stand guys like you. You are very selfish.
Looks like CNBC is trying to stear the conversation in favor of nvidia
Exactly!
They do this all the freaking time. All of their analysts push Apple like it's a default winner in every category when they have become the least interesting company of the Mag 7.
True, but they are correct.
This Diedre girl was completely biased!!!! Terrible reputation for CNBC. She belongs at CNN.
Yes, that seems to be the case. Jim Cramer is clearly Nvidia's biggest fan-or perhaps a close ally of Jensen Huang. It’s likely the same for many at CNBC, and there’s nothing inherently wrong with that. However, quantum computing is advancing rapidly. The CEO of D-Wave is no novice-he’s an MIT PhD, and most leaders in quantum computing have Ivy League credentials and years of experience at top companies.
As someone affiliated with one of the leading QC firms, I can confidently assert that the advancements in QC set to emerge by the end of March will be groundbreaking, especially from two of the 'Magnificent Seven' companies. While I encourage thorough research and understanding before making investment or business decisions, it is worth noting the far-reaching implications of these development, particularly regarding material scarcity and the transformative role QC could play in global power dynamics. To Jensen's remarks, they are not surprising, given his emphasis on non-quantum related innovations, not to mention he had just announced some of his products hours before, but they underscore the seismic impact quantum technology will have. Not only in industries but also in areas like national security and geopolitical stability. The future holds immense potential but QC is here and there is no next for QC, it is already.
So.. it this a good time to buy up those QC stocks?
@@homme436ask the random guy in youtube comments..don’t listen to nvidia’s CEO public comments
@@homme436 Please keep in mind that I am not a financial analyst. Personally, I would invest in IonQ, IBM and Honeywell for a year, and not worry about the market fluctuations.
@@homme436 Please keep in mind that I am not a financial analyst. Personally, I would invest in IonQ, IBM and Honeywell for a year, and not worry about the market fluctuations.
Cool, so that's one of the advancements out of 5 or 6 that Jensen said before QC will be useful. March will only bring you 1 order of magnitude closer.
In the 90s bezos was grilled on how much Amazon was losing money
I hope to get rich with my quantum brothers
I'm thinking of getting into investing but feel a bit lost and confused. Any friendly advice or contacts you recommend for guidance?
It's a wise idea to seek expert advice when you're setting up an investment portfolio because it can be a bit complicated.
Getting advice & guidance from financial experts like Alana Ringberg to adjust your investment is a wise move.
Wow. You know her too? I lost a lot of money as a beginner until I saw Mrs Alana Ringberg on CNBC. She's been managing my portfolio with good returns and I appreciate her sincerity and genuine services
So you guys also familiar with her? Whoa! She is amazing and the reason my spouse and I possess our own home and car
Wow Alana has been managing my investment. All I do is sit at home and make withdrawals every week without any knowledge of trading. She does everything by herself
I fell off my chair when Diedre asked Alan why his company is not valued as an AI company. Does she even know the difference between AI and Quantum Computing before she came here to pose questions?
I'm not defending her, but i believe her question was phrased as: why is your profitability not like an AI company. Better worded possibly as: if this technology is so much better (not arguing that it isn't) then why does your QC company appear to be in financial decline?
Obviously there are many reasons why completely unrelated to the feasibility and/ or superiority of either technology.
@@thamilton1218that’s not even a correct way to phrase playing devils advocate because AI is NOT profitable right now. As I understand, PLtR is the only one actually making profit from AI. The rest are burning cash. . . so you even got the hypothetical wrong lol
@@thamilton1218her phrasing was . . . Why are companies in AI getting lofty valuations and yours isn’t. given that his product is commercial
It was a fair question. Alan is falsely claiming that D-Wave can compete with AI companies. Also, a quantum computer should be able to do anything that a classical computer can do, only faster, so if his company is so good, then it should be more profitable than any AI company. Her question was therefore 100% relevant. You have no business questioning her knowledge when you are "falling off your chair" when you hear completely reasonable questions.
@NikeDattani I'll be the judge of what (not) to do when I fall off my chair with none of your assistance. First of all, AI and Quantum are 2 different sects despite being part of tech space. If one is the process the other is the processor. AI had all these years of precedent Big Data and cloud maturity behind it to finally make sense of what data can deliver to consumers and how tech companies can leverage it should they have the drive. Quantum, on the other hand, is hardware - in the most nascent stage of its development to get a lot more of it right before it becomes a mass market product which I have confidence in the current crop of companies to achieve. Stay patient, intuitive instead of getting carried away of what people say
She is totally awful at interviewing. I'm glad that cnbc gave her a chance, but I find it hard to want to keep watching this.
He seemed extremely defensive..those are terrible optics. He avoided the question about Q3 drop in revenue (should have addressed that) and should have just been straightforward saying we are working on x,y and z and expect revenues to increase substantially over the next few quarters. He undoubtedly is brilliant but he needs to learn how to verbalize his argumetns in such a way as to not come across as flippant or demeaning.
right? The sighing in between was so disrespectful and annoying. She clearly doesn't know what she is talking about.
I disagree. She knows more about what she's talking about than the CEO of D-Wave.
@@NikeDattani She thought she did, but does not understand his expertise. Just her mannerisms are all wrong, not suited for an interviewer.
@@NikeDattani Do you even believe yourself?
Quantum is here and being used. Jensen is scared and knowingly lied through his teeth.
Exactly he knows the threat
@@dRisk_Analytics being used in lab or in commercial world?
From all these companies IonQ was the only real one with revenue and 80% of their income is from a government airforce contract. Even alphabet, who literally set off this rally with willow, said its at least 10 years away.
it will definitely be useful when it crosses a certain threshold or if we find a different use case, but right now it's just a really fast car in a world with no roads
@@strider8539 then I guess no surprise to see stock price drops 50% when people realize it
As I had already hands-on the D-Wave quantum annealers and I am using it for solving NP problems applicable in real life like e.g. autonomous vehicle motion planning, I can agree - it is now, today, commercially usable and I am looking forward the new Zephyr topology 🤞🏻 and everybody here commenting should first learn the difference between QPU which NVIDIA is using or IBM, Google are developing (the general quantum gate-based computer) and the D-Wave Systems Quantum ANNEALER.
You are lying about solving vehicle motion planning on an annealer. You are solving Micky Mouse versions of it on an annealer, but real commercial versions of it will be done faster on a cell phone chip.
@NikeDattani Volkswagen don't reckon their problems were Mickey Mouse problems. Also did you see the Lisbon traffic management programme?
@@NikeDattani challenge accepted ;)
@@QuanTessla name-dropping a famous car company that spends 0.0000001% of their budget playing around with quantum toys for publicity, doesn't give quantum computing credibility to real scientists.
@NikeDattani name dropping their customer who have proven real world success. You haven't been around business long if you don't understand proving your concept , showcasing your skills, proving success is more crucial than pricing in the early days. Pricing will come when they continue to prove their successes as they have done in every segment and sector they've penetrated so far. Keep providing your lazy bear thesis I'm trying to find someone with any actual substance in their bear case but as such no substance still !
alan is a brave CEO defending quantum computing. he is right
Bosa is not an investigative reporter and shouldn’t pretend to be one. She is however qualified to appear on Hollywood Reporter.
My immediate thought was why is she so biased towards NVIDIA LOL
You're just biased toward not losing money.
😂
That's not fair, she asked perfectly good questions and her research was all accurate.
please 🙏 never come in cnbc comments and speak poorly of dierdre again unless warranted. she’s incredibly talented and deserves her flowers. your problem is yourself. learn more, and do your homework. this trade will be a lesson for you, you can easily turn it into a positive for your path forward. good luck.
If an entire sector tanks like that after one influential person expresses doubt, then that sector was obviously way overbought.
investors follow crowd think without doing sufficient research. Certainly not understanding.
@@IanQuantum2027 precisely, just like when Elon smoked on the JRE podcast, the tank is only temporary
Q3 revenue was $6.5 million. The liquor store at the end of the street generates more. Why would Huang be afraid?
Because companies don't always stay on top. A snap of a finger can change everything
I know a few part time only fan models making that 😆
@@jarronjackson6670 thats crazy haha
@@HOPE4u00 Then Jensen would buy the company dumbo. NVDA makes more revenue in 5 minutes than these companies make in a year. Anyone of value would have been bought by Google Microsoft Nvidia Amazon whomever. They all are vaporware jokes.
@@HOPE4u00just like thanos
I have a feeling that Jensen said something that might not be entirely true. This is just my personal opinion-not because I think he lied, but because I feel he’s trying to protect and prioritize his own interests in Nvidia. It’s something anyone in his position might do.
I feel investors should focus on under-the-radar stocks, considering the current rollercoaster nature of the stock market, Because 35% of my $270k portfolio comprises plummeting stocks that were once revered. I don't know where to go here out of devastation.
Find quality stocks that have long term potential, and ride with those stocks. I have found it takes someone who is very familiar with the market to make such good picks.
Yes. It is very easy to buy in on trending stocks but the problem is knowing when to sell or hold, which is why a coach is important. I've been in touch with one for about a year now and although I was initially skeptical about it, I will say I've made more progress within a year generating 6figure profit
This is incredible. Could you recommend who you work with? I really could use some help at this moment.
My CFA, Laurel Ann Watkins, is a renowned figure in her field. I recommend researching her name online; you’ll find all her credentials and everything you need to work with a reliable professional. With many years of experience, she is a valuable resource for anyone looking to navigate the financial market.
Thanks for sharing. I curiously searched for her full name and her website popped up immediately. I looked through her credentials and did my due diligence before contacting her.
Hopefully his interview gives the quantum sector some hope and reprisal for Friday's trading. A lot of folks got slammed when their q positions tanked due to Jensen's comment. I don't have any skin in the game but I hate seeing the pain those guys must be feeling rn.
I have skin in the game and I hope every relevant person sees this interview and gets this stock back to where it was at Tuesday's levels.
@sidneywallace406 I'm trying to share as much as I can. Showed this video to my trading discord where theres a few with skin in the game hoping they hang in there as you should too. Best of luck
@@sidneywallace406 I took this as an advantage to buy more stocks, brought my average down significantly as well
@@sidneywallace406 hahaha Jensen rekt you with one comment
When the software is there, these stocks will fly. NVidia is just jealous of their computing power vs their bleeding edge GPUs/Physics processors
amazing job deirdre. already prepared. homework is everything in this business. u are 10/10. thx 🙏
Jensen was within his rights with the comment, but he was commenting on an unknown variable--that being how many entities are working on quantum and where they're at. Quantum already has proven uses. I'm still at a loss as to why he'd make such a comment.
What kind of questioning was that… be fair and actually listen to the answers , just repeating what the producer in the ear and script
yeah let the guy just state fat earnings. When they never have been profitable is absolutly fair to investors
At least someone who has the ball the ball to stand up and tell something to Jensen who has no business downgrading other companies by nasty talk .selfishness
When IONQ debuts AQ64 this year, people will be astonished, including jensen.
@@fraugendaz when?
@felizh82 Ionq speaks tomorrow at CES. AQ 64 tempo is scheduled to debut in 2025... Many think it could be within months
@@fraugendazI think it will go beyond 50 when 64 qubit is successfully launched
IONQ is partnered with NVIDIA LOL not a big deal lol Jensen already knows the quantum computing is an area of his interests and utilizing it already
@@davidbyun8392 Nvidia is actively hiring Quantum Computing Engineers, he knows the technology is here and is terrified of the competition
If anyone were to be capable of reading, Jensen said “very useful quantum computers” were 20 years off. To be “very useful” these computers would need to be manufactured at scale, have deep, proven libraries of developmental and supportive software with millions of developers well versed in the technology, would need to solve many problems existing today such as error correction and would need to maintain its effectiveness against advancements in current accelerated computing trends offering 1,000,000x performance gains per decade and AI performance is increasing at even faster rate. Quantum computers will absolutely make waves and change the world in some ways, but there’s infinitely more to worry about beyond producing a piece of hardware
I wonder who initially asked Jensen Huang that question, or if he was perhaps influenced by short sellers to speak critically about quantum computing. It’s worth noting that quantum computing stocks have experienced noticeably high short interest, a significant number of failures-to-deliver (FTDs) in recent months, and extremely high borrowing fees.
This is dumb ape talk.
Lol dude, we haven’t even figured out how to fact check our quantum data yet - as in the results themselves can’t even be verified, so in theory it could just be an error (I’m mostly referring to the Willow “breakthrough”)… How can you fault the guy for making a statement like that? Make no mistake, these are speculative stocks, and even if we aren’t 30 years away like Jensen says, we’re at least more than 5
@@User-ow7biI have a sinister degenerate thought, includes your favorite rollercoaster AI retail stock... Palantir. He mentioned optimization almost like thats the light workside of their present day executable capabilities. So now my noodles getting wet wondering if this is a company setting itself up to seriously take market share for defense, public administration, healthcare, etc contracts. Maybe Im thinking to big or maybe company's like Salesforce or Snowflake just got leapfrogged.
@@acoop9865 That's a non sequitur argument. Google is really far behind and we're talking about breaking Bitcoin in 2027. If the private key works, do you really need to *also* run a check in quantum algorithm? classical verification for NISQ computation
It was a question regarding short term outlook. in optimistic cases thy will be profitable in 5 years and they are running out of cash in two quartals by there earnings so s far )=
In 2024, D-Wave invested $5 million in research and development (R&D) during the second quarter, representing 33% of its revenue for that period 🥵🥵🥵
Worth watching how many of these companies will work with Nvidia now or in future.
This reporter should get her fact straight and learn about AI and Quantum Mechanics so she can construct good questions when it comes to Quantum Computing or the technology
fact is they never have been profitable. Should they just let him tell all people he made fat racks already with quantum as he tried and when he gets called out he changes his statement to we going to be profitable soon. Thats cap and needs to be called out
I'm an era of tech bros that just show up in hoodies and t shirts it's refreshing to see somebody just bringing an old school suit with a mustache
And the power red tie with cuff links on the same day we hit a 50% drop…he showed up like a true G
The Freddie Mercury of Quantum Computing
@@luislallave9666 More like state of Sava type guy
I’m buying more D-Wave and selling all NVDA… As an electrical engineer … I respect what D-Wave CEO said, his belief, and his mission… Trust me quantum has a bright future.. I have done 5 years of my own research … And what he is saying is true and resonates with my finding and beyond… when NVDA CEO partners with DWave is when I’ll buy NVDA again. I don’t think they would have a choice … The proof is in the pudding..😂
Same here 🙌🙌🙌🙌
quantum AI is the next thing and everyone should pay close attention NVIDIA has no foundation for quantum computing. They are still in the 80's mindset
Useful Chemistry, Physics AI, not plagiarism AI
First Elon bought X and now he launched the XAI34v token this year is crazy
Scam, you really need to stop this sh...
@@dreams2rea1ityX for real the bots for this scam coin are insane.
thats crazy haha xD. I hope there is quantum in there or comment section will not invest
I cant find Jensen saying that... When and where exactly, there is no video of him saying that.
why did she keep interrupting him?
Jensen, Jim Cramer, Federal Reserve, when these people speak, the market goes down. Jensen was over his head when he spoke negative about Quantum. He has too much money and he forgot where he came from.
He was cautious of quantum industry😅
Jensen will be part of the Quantum computing industry I can guarantee you. NVDIA will build better machines than any of those newcomers
@PathsOfValor jensen doesn't have the Physicists background that have patent protected their work to the hilt. He can join the gated race with every other man and his dog
$200 Million market cap to $3 Billion in ONE year? The retail pump and its FOMO followers earned this hard lesson.
Nvidia went from 400 billion to 4 trillion in 2 years. :) Welcome to the 2020s!
Fartcoin has 1.5 billion market cap in a few months
Only losers are those want to get rich now.. anyone holding at the precise of an era should know these companies will.not disappear overnight
@@Minejc12 poor naive people…
The earnings don't lie
What earnings?..
The negative earnings?
The -£82m net income?
Let’s wait for the fourth quarter. Just like how people does not believe in Tsla’s earning on March of 2020
@@shadrach05 Thats the whole point
Revenue should be exploding even if earnings are negative for such an amazing technology that is "ready for market"
Thank you. I just bought at the dip😀.
A 40% decline is not called a dip. 30%+ decline is called a "crash"
@@Sam-lp3bm If it goes down then up it's a dip. 3 major companies finished higher on Wednesday than the lowest point of the session. We will see what happens in the next few days and weeks.
@@Sam-lp3bm It's a dip if it goes up again, it's a crash if it never goes up again to the same heights. so only time would tell I guess...
Some analysts believe Huang's remarks were self-serving, as Nvidia is a major player in the AI and traditional computing sectors. By downplaying the immediate potential of quantum computing, Huang might be aiming to maintain investor confidence in Nvidia's current technologies and stock.
This issue is you talking heads calling him an authority. Huang is no longer the top dog and knows he is late to the party. Would not be surprised if Nvidia is looking to buy a quantum tech company and purposely drove the price down
@@jb-zl8cf NVDA have tried to purchase RGTI and had to settle for partnership. Then if you search they have CURRENTLY a huge recruitment drive on for quantum engineers 💀 not gonna take the SEC long to figure this one out lmao
if Nvidia had interest in quantum they would have shopped it all
I love how you broke down the XAI34v project in your video! Can’t wait to see it skyrocket!
Is D-Wave supposed to be a Canadian company? I thought they're the same company that's existed since the 80's in Burnaby just right next to BCIT.
1999 they were founded. Hq in Canada but have offices in a variety of places including silicon Valley
He's not wrong; Quantum is a non factor until they can be utilized in PCs; Quantum PC. Nothing wrong with it; just keep developing, you have customers but are you profitable?
Apple already used quantum dots MacBook M4
@@speakenglish4785 Quantum dots aren't anything to do with quantum computers.
@@FlowerPower2222-p4u Jesus christ lol, the guy you're replying to... it really shows the level of knowledge of the people buying this.
@@speakenglish4785 No! that's not the quantum we are talking about...
Almost all the comments here are worthless.
The biggest lesson I learned in 2024 about the stock market is that nobody knows what will happen next, so practice some humility and low a strategy with a long-term edge.
Nobody knows anything; You need to create your process, manage risk, and stick to the plan, through thick or thin, While also continuously learning from mistakes and improving.
@@JacobReynolds-t7v True, initially I wasn't quite impressed with my gains, as opposed to my previous performances, I was doing so badly, that I figured I needed to diversify into better assets, I touched base with a portfolio advisor, and that same year, I pulled a net gain of 550k...that's like 7times more than I average on my own.
@@ChristophersHoyts Could you kindly elaborate on the advisor's background and qualifications?
@@LucaMurgia-j7b I've shuffled through investment coaches; they can positively impact an individual's portfolio. But do your due diligence to find a coach with grit that withstood the 2008 crash. MARGARET MOLLI ALVEY was better and smarter than all the advisors I have ever worked with. I’ve never met anyone with as much conviction.
@@ChristophersHoyts I just ran an online search on her name and came across her website; pretty well educated. thank you for sharing.
Wow she's in way over her head unless they were intentionally trying to steer conversation. So weird and unprofessional. And im a huge Nvidia fan and investor but this interview was terrible.
should they let every company use their reach to say we going to the moon even after a 40 percent tank?
props for the CEO
Monetizing a solution is different than using it
Also everyone knows AI needs Quantum, we need it Moore’s Law is ……
Is Deirdre that stupid or she is just playing dumb ? Alan said he was wrong about the benefit timing 30 years from today when Alan said companies are benefiting today . Some similarities about Quantum and AI but not all equal. To summarize it .
He was gasping for air when asked about the balance sheet...
i expected he would say "yes my business make 0 money until 2040 sorry, keep selling the stock of my company"
What were Amazon's quarterlies for the first five years? What AI company quarterlies at the onset when everyone was terrified that they were going to take over the world?
Amazon had no profits but they had high revenue. These guys have very low revenue... it's okay not to have profits or if you're a research outfit just be honest and say you're still in development, but you can't say TODAY and then show no revenue. That being said he couldn't explain why revenue last quarter was low.
Yeah!!!! You tell it!!! Quantum is here now!!!!!
Thank you Lord Jesus for the gift of life and blessings to me and my family $14,120.47 weekly profit Our lord Jesus have lifted up my Life!!!🙏❤️❤️
I'm 37 and have been looking for ways to be successful, please how??
Sure, the investment-advisor that guides me is..
Mrs Joyce kim
Same i met Joyce kim last year for the first time at a conference in Wilshire after then my Life has changed for good.God bless Joyce kim
Her services is the best, I got a brand new Lambo last week and paid off my mortgage loan thanks to her wonderful services!
As an investment enthusiast, I often wonder how top-level investors are able to become millionaires through investing. I have a significant amount of capital to start with, but I'm unsure about the strategies and direct I should take to help me generate substantial profits like some people are this season.
Factos!!. After experiencing a major portfolio loss in 2020 amid the COVID pandemic while trying to manage my investments on my own, I reached out to an investment advisor. They helped me turn my $420k into a seven-figure portfolio by providing the guidance and strategy I needed. Having that expertise made a significant difference in my investment journey.
Thanks for sharing your experience! I’ve been managing my portfolio myself, but it’s not working out. Do you have any recommendations for a good investment advisor? I could really use some help.
Nikki Leigh Brooks is a highly respected figure in her field. I suggest delving deeper into her credentials, as she possesses extensive experience and serves as a valuable resource for individuals seeking guidance in navigating the financial market.
Thank you so much for the suggestion! I really needed it. I looked her up on Google and explored her website; she has an impressive background in investments. I've sent her an email, and I hope to hear back from her soon!
there were go so and so made me a millionaire his or her constact is bla bla bla
This is the last time I watch anything with Deidre
Quantum Computing is like the guy from Office Space in the employee review meeting that gets asked "So what is it that you actually do?"
Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought Jensen's new thesis on his company was quantum computing since AI was no longer helping? I remember he uttered quantum computing on his earnings or a press conference and now he's backtracking?
He's not backtracking, he's investing in QC research and foundational work like many companies, this will just take years to mature and be a real business. It's just logical.
D-wave doesn't make universal quantum computers. They make a hardware that computes specific quantum optimization algorithm. I don't think Jensen was talking about this kind of device.
There is no financial basis for these quantum companies to have their valuation gone up by 100-500 times since the announcement of willow. The market correction is quite justified
Exactly, anyone who bothered to learn anything about quantum and looked at the company fundamentals would have seen that coming. The sell off WAS going to happen the only question was WHEN.
There isn't alot of nuance, the interviewer is either not listening, doesn't understand the words given to her (annealing vs. gate-based systems), or was told to tow the Jensen/Nvidia line. Baratz made it clear, Quantum is solving problems today. Let's get he and Jensen on a stage for a sit down. Jensen gaslit the quantum industry.
Should be titled "D wave CEO saves his company's stock price from Nvidia' s quantum misinformation.😂😊
Title should be "D Wave CEO attempts to deny reality". Quantum stocks are pump and dumps with no path to profitability for next decades. Nothing Jensen said is suprising. Academics / scientists have been laughing at the quantum stocks that r being pumped by idiots.
not profitable is a fact and not calling that out would be harmful
Finally, CNBC asks critical questions.
This is a really bad interview conducted by CNBC Host and poor questions. She is creating fight between to CEO's.
QBTS managed to turn 9 million in revenue to a 78 million dollar loss. Seems like Jensen knows more than the CEO of QBTS.
The war is declared 😂
Go quantum!
What Jensen did to Quantum computing is exactly what Edison did to Tesla
Wow. Is she biased at all? Trying to nitpick his words and twist them into flip flopping. Get some journalistic class.
May the best product win.
As this is the way how Nvidia CEO treat his partners. I'm afraid of his relation to other partners than IONQ.
Yes despite his very biaised declaration Nvidia was listed as partner of IONQ on IONQ website..
What a shame for him...such a claim is a sign of fear about Quantum revolution.
If producers and journalists don’t understand a topic please don’t treat a guest aggressively, this looked very ignorant and unprofessional
Too much of optimization on Quantum computing like done a simulation in 5 secs which would take classical computer about to take 1 septillion years ., this is not a joke. You are closing exponential jobs out of industries. Too much of anything above optimum is not good
you're right actually, philosophically speaking; example: water. 'pure' water is quite toxic if ingested. the one we drink (with all the natural impurities/minerals/salts) is ok.
She shouldnt be interviewing. She asks questions then cuts him off while he is responding. Really unprofessional
Buying quantum computing stock is like buying Nvidia 16 years ago
I'm holding Dwave. Not planning to sell. These are just bumps in the road.
how much do you have
The FACT:
Quantum computer is euphemistically called: multiple simultaneous operations beyond 0 and 1,
But in fact, from the perspective of Gen AI's large language DNN model or the neural network architecture of human physiology, for each neural operation, only Y or N is needed (to take this neural route or not to take this)
In other words, the world of 0s and 1s is very suitable for home or cloud computing purposes, but quantum computers that exceed the multiple simultaneous operations of 0s and 1s are prohibitively expensive. My personal interpretation of NVIDIA's Jason Huang said that in 20 years, it is actually It means that it is cheap enough for everyone to buy it. If it can be bought for US$2,000, about 20% of households in the world can buy or rent this quantum computer service. But it will take 20 years for it to be so cheap. !
Sucks that one man can say one thing that isn’t a fully educated comment and be able to crash markets. They shots be held responsible to a point. Having a position of power like he does he shouldn’t be allowed to publicize his opinion unless he’s 100% accurate
nah it’s pretty cool
@@matt.stevickwell if you did some research into quantum computing you’d see his comments are because quantum computing is a threat to nvidia.
@@ARyanCoke i beg your pardon?
So you have a 20 giga watt future quantum computer that evolves a heuristic oracle for mini super computers with quantum compute units. Point being quantum computers can make lesser systems more optimal.
Most of the comments here don't know that companies like these don't have serious revenues and won't for several years because they simply invest them in their technology. How can you be "investors" and have an opinion when you don't know the basics? Is a company, QBTS, judged by its revenues? Keep doing it but I hope investments don't have these criteria. Some of the comments seem like trolls.
Makes no sense. Revenue vs income. Revenue doesn’t go down just because you invest the money you make back into the business unless you meant to say income. 3rd quarter revuene is 1M, like some people in the comments mentioned. , some liquor stores make that much money. The stock tanked, that’s why the ceo is out there trying to make a show. They are dependent on the stock price to maybe sell stocks to keep them a float.
@@wchen9465 Exactly. You can hear the fear in his voice
Bought 189 shares of this company this AM , and 3 call contracts
My Take, I think Deadra Bosa probably had the backs of Investors here - including mine. CEO Alan Baratz appears to be overemphasizing results by distracting Investors with technical language representing insignificant revenue accomplishments. D-Wave is losing money and burning cash to the point of being insolvent this year, per publicly reported information. Ms Bosa, thank you for having the courage to confront probable misleading double-speak. Patrick McInturff
I feel like he glossed over what went wrong in his down business quarter. And he could benefit from better storytelling as a CEO
what problems?
This guy is losing it
no he responding to a bogus claim right now
PLEASE STOP CUTTING OFF THE GUESTS!!!!
Hell yes. That takes balls. Im buying this guys stock. He is on a different level. Watch this cat.
OMG this interviewer is not the right person for this interview, she doesnt even understand what she is talking about, they couldnt understand each other at the end
the sales tell everything. selling dream or selling product?
Asked chatbox AI: in summary quantum computing is available in experimental forms. Its practical applications for broader audiences will likely evolve over the next decade or two
Hope this is the time to get the cheapest price QC stocks. Jensen Huang (CEO of NVidia), Your Cry on QC for last 3 months would be satisfied by buying 1 triliaon QC stocks. Please do it now.
Is she an investor in Nvidia?
Maybe or maybe not... journalists are trying to challenge guests.
she shorted d-wave
That reporter was horrific. She was borderline rude
A really good reporter. What are you complaining on?
Size of revenue and growth tell everything.
We're at 1000 qubits and we need to be at 1 million to be useful.
Now that both Jensen and Zuck have commented about the tech being a decade plus away, it could be an effort to stall quantum computers having to be replaced by typewriters...maybe?
That anchor’s attitude at the end 🤮
It is nice to see a journalist actually ask hard questions...but I think she is a bit harsh with the future reality of quantum cpmputing - I am into $ QTUM and will stay there.
Whyd Mr Alan sell 344,313 shares ( almost 1 mil $ in value ) on dec 6 ? come on now
Jenson's comments were purely self-serving.
Invidia is lagging behind in this area and so he had to throw Quantam companies under the bus so that Invidia remains the leader.
Investors were some what disappointed of his presentation and were expecting him to reveal something more spectacular than what he presented like a quantam chip and so he had to tell people that is not possible at the moment.