The ISS should be put into a higher orbit, and maintained as a museum. As technology improves, launch and operations costs decrease, the ISS should be moved into a higher, stable orbit, where it can await, for maintenance and use.
Unfortunately, it's not that simple. If it's not taken down, it will fall apart and become a hazard. The pressure vessels (and the joining seals) have gone through countless hot and cold cycles, etc. It is at the end of it's life.
What would be best, is if modules could be retrieved in the new Heavy Lift vehicle, like Starship, and brought back to be sent out to national museums for their country of origin, and then de-orbit the frame work structures that are keeping those modules running. As Patrick commented above, it's been through so many heating and cooling cycles, that it's fatigued to the point where it needs replacing. The only orbit that would keep the whole ISS intact is one where it remains at a constant temperature, either in the sunlight or in the shade. In the light, it eventually over heats unless it's moved further out away from the Sun, in the shade it quickly freezes and cracks.
So awesome! I’d love to see a test where they shoot the module with different firearm rounds to demonstrate its real resilience against micro-meteorite impacts.
I'm surprised the engineers didn't include a layer with a self-hardening chemical mix to improve the habitat's rigidity after inflation. I'm also bemused about why they favored a catastrophic failure mechanism over a progressive one with the same ultimate pressure as a progressive mechanism would not only enhance safety for the inhabitants but also prevent explosive disassembly in the event of a puncture
No need, as any internal pressure will help it keep its shape. The extra mass would be no so good. In terms of failure mechanism, most actual failures would likely be progressive. But building that in would require essentially building in weakness.
They do longer tests as well. They just don't make as cool a vid. As for some chemical process that happens post-deployment, that sounds like a huge pain.
Rigid structures have there own drawbacks like stress and material fatigue. Over pressure valves are common enough to prevent ever reaching failure point...
_"I'm surprised the engineers didn't include [...]"_ If you knew anything about engineering, you would not be surprised by that. _"also prevent explosive disassembly in the event of a puncture"_ Are you under the silly idea that if punctured it will pop like a balloon? smh
I live in the city where they are testing these things. We have an arsenal where they literally test bombs and detonate expired ordinances. So, we hear booms basically every single day. But when they blow these things up, it is way more intense. It literally shook houses miles away. For some reason they tested one on October 29th at around 9:30 or 10 p.m. and woke up basically half of North Alabama.
That sounds like it was the second test-to-fail unit, where they vastly exceeded the expected fail points, so the pressure achieved was much higher, with a inside to outside ratio of close to 7:1, compared to this tests 4:1 (remembering that it's 1:1 at around 15psi, because of the outside air.)
Looks like Bigelow Aerospace sold their rights to the inflatable space station. Bigelow Aerospace version was called the BEAM short for bigelow expandable activity module. I know this because I’ve worked on it in Las Vegas.
It won't be any more an issue than the current ISS hull. Contrary to what people think, the multiple layers of kevlar in the ISS hull provide far more protection than the outmost metal layer.
Actually, probably still 77. Typically, when you're measuring pressure in the atmosphere, it's already accounting for atmospheric pressure, so you're just measuring the difference. So it's likely that they inflated it to the absolute pressure of 91.7 psia, which would read as 77 psig. In space, it would fail still at 77 psia.
Right, right. Also, there's no outside atmospheric pressure in space that presses against the habitat from all sides. Wow! That's some crazy level material engineering! You could use maintenance bots in space that slowly paint aluminum on the outside to reinforce the inflatable for prolonged usages.
White works better for heat rejection - the materials used to make the white coatings are mirror-reflective at Infra Red frequencies. When they hit Four times atmospheric pressure inside, that's effectively the same loading as Three times inside when in space. The latest version has gone higher again before failure.
History reading suggestion - NASA's "TransHab" program, and then Bigelow Aerospace's "BEAM". There's some really interseting stories behind it, especially regarding how Bigelow was funded (all above board) and had planned for their modules, before the GFC got in the way. :)
I would think the next step instead of trying to blow it up is to have it hold at 60 PSI for 48 hours without leaking. Just a pressure test to hold it cuz even though it holds at 15 psi it can still have a small leak somewhere.
This was the first burst test, and at the time of posting by NOVA, the second had been completed, to an even higher pressure, With a Window installed in the side of the L.I.F.E. module. Sierra are really taking the NASA TRANSHab and Bigelows B.E.A.M technology and doing amazing work with it. The size these modules will be able to reach when flown on the new Heavy Lift class of rockets being developed by SpaceX and Blue Origin, will be like launching Apartment Buildings in to space, giving much more useable volume for sciences, engineering, and living, for those working there.
The same way the ISS does. Contrary to what people think, the multiple layers of kevlar in the ISS hull provide far more protection than the outmost metal layer.
Great innovation. What would happen if the bag was tripled bagged then aired up. Will this increase more pressure. Would love to see more testing on this subject. In theory more layers the better. Triple the mass of everything ignore the weight and go for a bigger test. If successful then the team and company can make it more possible for the future.
Gently placing to the side my passion for watching researchers safely blow things up, I am heartened by the new ideas which will be used for building habitats in space. Looking forward to NASA weening off of SpaceX as NASA moves towards supporting/enlisting the help of space organizations which do not harbour hate and anti-science enablers (e.g., Elon Musk types). Please, do not get me wrong. The people working for Elon are incredible. It is that they their work and ideas are benefitting a harmful and unfit member of our species. Say no to owning a Tesla and say no to relying on SpaceX for any of our of international space goals and explorations. Say yes to keeping space a place for our humanity and not for our weaknesses, e.g., hate, corruption, and psychopathies, just to name a few.🌸
If you're testing at 15 PSI outside and only 65 psi inside, correct me if I'm wrong... That is in a 4X safety factor, in order to do a 4X safety factor you would have to multiply 15 PSI * 5 so you would be at 75 PSI for a burst test. And since it's a pressure vessel, shouldn't you be testing it with liquid internally instead of air? I was routinely testing pressure vessels and we always had to test with liquid not air.
Definitely going in the right direction. I'll be really impressed when the can make it a mile diameter. Not verry thick walled for all the features considered so there's room for reinforcement like a "retread". Spin it to 1.5 g and be naturally buff.😁
Decades back there was a scheme to use multiple space shuttle fuel tanks, empty, after the shuttle reached orbit, linked together to form a small toroidal structure to serve as the basis of a spin-grav space station.
11:02 I wonder how large of a micrometeorite that skin could withstand. Generally you want multiple layers of protection rather than a single thick skin. With using an inflatable bubble I would expect that a single hole would compromise the rest of the bubble's ability to hold its shape rather quickly. Patching it wouldn't necessarily be that bad if you got it patched within a minute or so (see The Expanse)... Getting to that layer through the 7 other sealed layers around it though.... How would you even start?
_"I would expect that a single hole would compromise the rest of the bubble's ability to hold its shape rather quickly"_ You're assuming the engineers aren't smart enough to create the inflatable section with multiple internal bulkheads. Don't. They're smarter than either of us. I assure you they've had multiple all-night brainstorming sessions imagining everything that could go wrong.
@AlbertaGeek I spent about 5 minutes remembering a very similar idea from SevenEves by Neil Stephenson. And a presentation I saw in school on how orbital collisions with flecks of paint when moving 20x a bullets ' top velocity can create a 1/2" deep hole from multiple layers of safety glass.
@@ColinLeet Yes? So what? Engineers matter, not fiction writers. And multiple layers of safety glass is inferior to multiple layers of something like kevlar.
Wow… Space, where an object as small as a grain of sand can carve a crater into a steel plate from velocity alone. And now, scientists hope to send astronauts up there in a giant inflatable balloon. The weird part is not that they want to do this, the weird part is that as crazy as it sounds, it might actually work, and work very well indeed! (I’m writing this with a mesmerized smirk on my face). Isn't science grand!
@Amsterdampardoc1 It's not so much the parts as the materials that they are composed of. Better to salvage what is already there to be recovered for use again. No sense wasting all that gold, copper, platinum, etc. burning up on re-entry. Every penny counts.
need the uk versions, also hate the repetition of information on u.s. media. repeat everything twice by default. mars cant hold an oxygen rich atmosphere due to its low gravity. its a dead end mining colony. venus on the other hand can be easily tweaked to be more earthllike, has all the ingridients.
Former Boeing... this new type of habitat has many advantages over former habitats. I am all for a new International Space Station... however I am not in favor of returning to the Moon or sending humans to Mars. We've been to the Moon numerous times and there is no reason to go to Mars in person. We already have probes on the surfaces and satellites overhead. We know more about the Moon and Mars than we do our own deep oceans. Let's replace ISS and map our own planet including deep oceans. If anyone has a valid reason to go back to Moon or send people to Mars please let me know. I have 3 advanced degrees and decades of experience... I was the biggest supporter of NASA and was around when Sputnik was launched and when men walked on the Moon. Don't give me 'trickle down technology' that was pushed for decades. ROI is only about 1:100. Money is better spent on directly funding R / D here on Earth. Cheers...
Is also annoying generally. This is not a music video. There have been a few videos where for some strange reason the video creators chose music which had about the same beat as the person's voice & it greatly interfered with understanding the speakers.
Use the same methods used for the balloons which get used as spacesuits. For one reference, look up Cosmo BC astroblog of March 13, 2010, about inflatable space stations. It mention's Bigelow's testing which showed that at least some particles which would puncture a rigid metal structure would end up bouncing off a resilient inflatable structure. 🛰 In addition, it is expected that these inflatable habitats can borrow the concept of self-sealing fuel tanks like military aircraft have used since the previous century. 🛰 Plus, NASA and others hold patents for things such as the "Multi-Layered Self-Healing Material System For Impact Mitigation, LAR-TOPS-122". 🛰 And I'll bet the concept was being looked at as far back as 1961 when NASA commissioned Goodyear to build a 30 foot diameter prototype of a ring shaped inflatable space station, but only here on the ground. Mostly what I remember of that one is the astronauts found the interior fragrance of 'old tire' objectionable.
I once saw a building being demolished with a wrecking ball. I thought, it's a good thing they're tearing it down, if it can't even stand up to a wrecking ball.
Human bodies will never inhabitate another planet or space, maybe Mars for brief stints. Human bodies are too fragile and temporary. Ithinks it's great to explore the universe to better understand and improve Earth's existence.
Please please take a page from spaceX’s playbook. Just get one of these in space and test it for real and stop bullshiting. You have been in development since 2018. C’mon! Development’s of new tech shouldn’t be taking 1/2 a decade.
Love your videos, NOVA!
This looks like something you'd see at a space trailer park in the distant future...
Space hobo tents will come with a roll of duct tape, for the micro meteorites zipping thru.
Yurts in space. It was bound to happen. Good design has no expiration.
Hippie encampments
Imagine the unregulated beer bottles, junked spacecraft, and poop...
Getting Blown-Up in Space takes a whole new level of understanding, wtf 😳🤯💥
P.S, anybody remember the Tom & Jerry jokes about ( Deflation) 😅🤣😂
10:42 is where you see the explosion
😮 Thanks
Mom, to kids in space... "Close the damn door!! You're letting the space in!"
And dark matter.....racist....haha
That's not how it works.
I'm reminded of an episode of Mythbusters. "Jamie wants a big boom!" 😁
The ISS should be put into a higher orbit, and maintained as a museum. As technology improves, launch and operations costs decrease, the ISS should be moved into a higher, stable orbit, where it can await, for maintenance and use.
Unfortunately, it's not that simple. If it's not taken down, it will fall apart and become a hazard. The pressure vessels (and the joining seals) have gone through countless hot and cold cycles, etc. It is at the end of it's life.
What would be best, is if modules could be retrieved in the new Heavy Lift vehicle, like Starship, and brought back to be sent out to national museums for their country of origin, and then de-orbit the frame work structures that are keeping those modules running.
As Patrick commented above, it's been through so many heating and cooling cycles, that it's fatigued to the point where it needs replacing.
The only orbit that would keep the whole ISS intact is one where it remains at a constant temperature, either in the sunlight or in the shade. In the light, it eventually over heats unless it's moved further out away from the Sun, in the shade it quickly freezes and cracks.
So awesome! I’d love to see a test where they shoot the module with different firearm rounds to demonstrate its real resilience against micro-meteorite impacts.
Agreed. Its more realistic the issue is space projectiles.
I'm surprised the engineers didn't include a layer with a self-hardening chemical mix to improve the habitat's rigidity after inflation. I'm also bemused about why they favored a catastrophic failure mechanism over a progressive one with the same ultimate pressure as a progressive mechanism would not only enhance safety for the inhabitants but also prevent explosive disassembly in the event of a puncture
No need, as any internal pressure will help it keep its shape. The extra mass would be no so good.
In terms of failure mechanism, most actual failures would likely be progressive. But building that in would require essentially building in weakness.
They do longer tests as well. They just don't make as cool a vid. As for some chemical process that happens post-deployment, that sounds like a huge pain.
@patricklewis7636 Quality control testing would be a nightmare
Rigid structures have there own drawbacks like stress and material fatigue. Over pressure valves are common enough to prevent ever reaching failure point...
_"I'm surprised the engineers didn't include [...]"_
If you knew anything about engineering, you would not be surprised by that.
_"also prevent explosive disassembly in the event of a puncture"_
Are you under the silly idea that if punctured it will pop like a balloon? smh
I live in the city where they are testing these things. We have an arsenal where they literally test bombs and detonate expired ordinances. So, we hear booms basically every single day. But when they blow these things up, it is way more intense. It literally shook houses miles away. For some reason they tested one on October 29th at around 9:30 or 10 p.m. and woke up basically half of North Alabama.
I was wondering about that. I was also concerned for animals😢
That sounds like it was the second test-to-fail unit, where they vastly exceeded the expected fail points, so the pressure achieved was much higher, with a inside to outside ratio of close to 7:1, compared to this tests 4:1 (remembering that it's 1:1 at around 15psi, because of the outside air.)
Looks like Bigelow Aerospace sold their rights to the inflatable space station. Bigelow Aerospace version was called the BEAM short for bigelow expandable activity module. I know this because I’ve worked on it in Las Vegas.
Didn’t know “explode” was a way to get to somewhere.
Gotta love those Sierra Space burst test videos
This is great but living beyond earth's magnitosphe is still a problem due to cosmic radiation.
It won't be any more an issue than the current ISS hull. Contrary to what people think, the multiple layers of kevlar in the ISS hull provide far more protection than the outmost metal layer.
Elon musk has already captured the lucrative space screen door and window market.
That burst at 77 psi on earth with 15 psi pushing on it from the outside. What would the burst pressure be in the vacuum of space
Just subtract. 77-15=62 psi
Actually, probably still 77. Typically, when you're measuring pressure in the atmosphere, it's already accounting for atmospheric pressure, so you're just measuring the difference. So it's likely that they inflated it to the absolute pressure of 91.7 psia, which would read as 77 psig. In space, it would fail still at 77 psia.
@@tarktari Bingo!
Yeah, i feel they are trying to say 77 psi difference from inner/outer
@@tarktari This
@11:00 use 1/4 Speed!
You know what that means?
No beans and cornbread in space 😅
Right, right. Also, there's no outside atmospheric pressure in space that presses against the habitat from all sides. Wow! That's some crazy level material engineering!
You could use maintenance bots in space that slowly paint aluminum on the outside to reinforce the inflatable for prolonged usages.
White works better for heat rejection - the materials used to make the white coatings are mirror-reflective at Infra Red frequencies.
When they hit Four times atmospheric pressure inside, that's effectively the same loading as Three times inside when in space. The latest version has gone higher again before failure.
Honestly, the Habitat looks like a giant HomePod.
That was great!
I had no idea they are devellopping this.
History reading suggestion - NASA's "TransHab" program, and then Bigelow Aerospace's "BEAM". There's some really interseting stories behind it, especially regarding how Bigelow was funded (all above board) and had planned for their modules, before the GFC got in the way. :)
Double or triple layer with thin ice layer so csn recoverable and cooling also use air pressure to push fast maneuver avoid missile or debris
I would think the next step instead of trying to blow it up is to have it hold at 60 PSI for 48 hours without leaking. Just a pressure test to hold it cuz even though it holds at 15 psi it can still have a small leak somewhere.
This was the first burst test, and at the time of posting by NOVA, the second had been completed, to an even higher pressure, With a Window installed in the side of the L.I.F.E. module.
Sierra are really taking the NASA TRANSHab and Bigelows B.E.A.M technology and doing amazing work with it. The size these modules will be able to reach when flown on the new Heavy Lift class of rockets being developed by SpaceX and Blue Origin, will be like launching Apartment Buildings in to space, giving much more useable volume for sciences, engineering, and living, for those working there.
10:42 - if you just want to skip the blah, blah, blah...
How are they going to insulate from high energy particals ?
The same way the ISS does. Contrary to what people think, the multiple layers of kevlar in the ISS hull provide far more protection than the outmost metal layer.
Great innovation. What would happen if the bag was tripled bagged then aired up. Will this increase more pressure. Would love to see more testing on this subject. In theory more layers the better. Triple the mass of everything ignore the weight and go for a bigger test. If successful then the team and company can make it more possible for the future.
I won't be waving my hand to be part of the first space launch (or the second.) 😳
Gently placing to the side my passion for watching researchers safely blow things up, I am heartened by the new ideas which will be used for building habitats in space. Looking forward to NASA weening off of SpaceX as NASA moves towards supporting/enlisting the help of space organizations which do not harbour hate and anti-science enablers (e.g., Elon Musk types). Please, do not get me wrong. The people working for Elon are incredible. It is that they their work and ideas are benefitting a harmful and unfit member of our species. Say no to owning a Tesla and say no to relying on SpaceX for any of our of international space goals and explorations. Say yes to keeping space a place for our humanity and not for our weaknesses, e.g., hate, corruption, and psychopathies, just to name a few.🌸
But where do you get the air from to inflate this in space?
You ship it up on rockets
You ship it up like you do everything else. Duh.
Why do you have this ridiculous music competing with what's being said and ruining what could have been an interesting video ?
If you're testing at 15 PSI outside and only 65 psi inside, correct me if I'm wrong... That is in a 4X safety factor, in order to do a 4X safety factor you would have to multiply 15 PSI * 5 so you would be at 75 PSI for a burst test. And since it's a pressure vessel, shouldn't you be testing it with liquid internally instead of air? I was routinely testing pressure vessels and we always had to test with liquid not air.
Would these work underwater?
Definitely going in the right direction. I'll be really impressed when the can make it a mile diameter. Not verry thick walled for all the features considered so there's room for reinforcement like a "retread". Spin it to 1.5 g and be naturally buff.😁
:) Interesting idea; having special work out space stations at spinning gravities above 1.0 . And old people living in stations below 1.0
Decades back there was a scheme to use multiple space shuttle fuel tanks, empty, after the shuttle reached orbit, linked together to form a small toroidal structure to serve as the basis of a spin-grav space station.
Soooooo uh next test explosion in orbit? That's gonna be soooo kewl. Where does oxygen go in the vacuum of outer space!
11:02 I wonder how large of a micrometeorite that skin could withstand. Generally you want multiple layers of protection rather than a single thick skin. With using an inflatable bubble I would expect that a single hole would compromise the rest of the bubble's ability to hold its shape rather quickly. Patching it wouldn't necessarily be that bad if you got it patched within a minute or so (see The Expanse)... Getting to that layer through the 7 other sealed layers around it though.... How would you even start?
_"I would expect that a single hole would compromise the rest of the bubble's ability to hold its shape rather quickly"_
You're assuming the engineers aren't smart enough to create the inflatable section with multiple internal bulkheads. Don't. They're smarter than either of us. I assure you they've had multiple all-night brainstorming sessions imagining everything that could go wrong.
@AlbertaGeek I spent about 5 minutes remembering a very similar idea from SevenEves by Neil Stephenson. And a presentation I saw in school on how orbital collisions with flecks of paint when moving 20x a bullets ' top velocity can create a 1/2" deep hole from multiple layers of safety glass.
@@ColinLeet Yes? So what? Engineers matter, not fiction writers. And multiple layers of safety glass is inferior to multiple layers of something like kevlar.
Wow… Space, where an object as small as a grain of sand can carve a crater into a steel plate from velocity alone. And now, scientists hope to send astronauts up there in a giant inflatable balloon. The weird part is not that they want to do this, the weird part is that as crazy as it sounds, it might actually work, and work very well indeed! (I’m writing this with a mesmerized smirk on my face). Isn't science grand!
It looks just like my flat in England.
I didn't realize that it takes so many people to blow up a balloon. 😅
Why de-orbit ISS? Leave it in orbit and salvage its parts during the life of the next ISS.
The parts were designed and made ages ago, also stuff is breaking down frequently. The parts wouldn’t be useful later.
@Amsterdampardoc1 It's not so much the parts as the materials that they are composed of. Better to salvage what is already there to be recovered for use again. No sense wasting all that gold, copper, platinum, etc. burning up on re-entry. Every penny counts.
Obsolescence.
@@greghelton4668 Recycle.
Could we, for once, get a documentary without overly dramatic voice over? Jfc. Stop it already.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😅
Yes, I felt irritation from that too.
Yeah ,agree, left after 98 seconds
Glad that there are people who still like normalcy
need the uk versions, also hate the repetition of information on u.s. media. repeat everything twice by default.
mars cant hold an oxygen rich atmosphere due to its low gravity. its a dead end mining colony.
venus on the other hand can be easily tweaked to be more earthllike, has all the ingridients.
Yeah? And i know just who all i want to see go and test it out....
Legend has it that if you cross the ozone layer... You will burn in minutes which eventually leads to boiling to death 💀
Well, legend trumps science any day.
@falcychead8198 sorry i don't understand your point of opinion🙄
'basket Weave design' 😂 the aliens t laughing at us right now
Former Boeing... this new type of habitat has many advantages over former habitats. I am all for a new International Space Station... however I am not in favor of returning to the Moon or sending humans to Mars. We've been to the Moon numerous times and there is no reason to go to Mars in person.
We already have probes on the surfaces and satellites overhead. We know more about the Moon and Mars than we do our own deep oceans. Let's replace ISS and map our own planet including deep oceans.
If anyone has a valid reason to go back to Moon or send people to Mars please let me know. I have 3 advanced degrees and decades of experience... I was the biggest supporter of NASA and was around when Sputnik was launched and when men walked on the Moon. Don't give me 'trickle down technology' that was pushed for decades. ROI is only about 1:100. Money is better spent on directly funding R / D here on Earth.
Cheers...
Take some of that money and give it to people that are trying to survive on SOCIAL SECURITY WHIXH IS BELOW POVERTY
Before thinking about building safe housing on Mars shouldn’t we first solve the homelessness crisis on Earth?
No, send them to mars, they're the perfect guinea pigs
blue kachina
Wow, I think I have brain cancer after watching this one.
No music behind the commentary please. It’s annoying for people with anxiety. ❤
Is also annoying generally. This is not a music video. There have been a few videos where for some strange reason the video creators chose music which had about the same beat as the person's voice & it greatly interfered with understanding the speakers.
Nice! A little mythbusteresque. Keep up the habitatin'!
A repost dajvew
A balloon in space? And what about those dangerous objects that can punch a hole in steel due to their speed?
Use the same methods used for the balloons which get used as spacesuits. For one reference, look up Cosmo BC astroblog of March 13, 2010, about inflatable space stations. It mention's Bigelow's testing which showed that at least some particles which would puncture a rigid metal structure would end up bouncing off a resilient inflatable structure. 🛰 In addition, it is expected that these inflatable habitats can borrow the concept of self-sealing fuel tanks like military aircraft have used since the previous century. 🛰 Plus, NASA and others hold patents for things such as the "Multi-Layered Self-Healing Material System For Impact Mitigation, LAR-TOPS-122". 🛰 And I'll bet the concept was being looked at as far back as 1961 when NASA commissioned Goodyear to build a 30 foot diameter prototype of a ring shaped inflatable space station, but only here on the ground. Mostly what I remember of that one is the astronauts found the interior fragrance of 'old tire' objectionable.
Seveneves
The Martian coming to life.
I absolutely would not approve a habitat that catastrophically fails like that 😬 i would rather see a gradual failure...
The failure of a metal tube in space would be from a puncture or an explosive incident - the same as with this fabric enclosure.
I once saw a building being demolished with a wrecking ball. I thought, it's a good thing they're tearing it down, if it can't even stand up to a wrecking ball.
🤔Nice, but with the recent "junk", asteroid movement, magnetic crap and UFO stuff happening better make sure its armored and carrying shovels.😊😅😂
Human bodies will never inhabitate another planet or space, maybe Mars for brief stints.
Human bodies are too fragile and temporary.
Ithinks it's great to explore the universe to better understand and improve Earth's existence.
But 77psi isn't a lot.
Please please take a page from spaceX’s playbook. Just get one of these in space and test it for real and stop bullshiting. You have been in development since 2018. C’mon! Development’s of new tech shouldn’t be taking 1/2 a decade.
After you listen to SpaceX development, these things feels like a high school project. Nothing seriously. Ana I have a feeling, this will not go far.
As long as you have Sean Buckley leading the team, this project will never succeeded. Ask him about the beam.
Balloons in space is a hard no for me. Thanks.😊
Yeah, ya proved it in front of a green screen in a film studio harnessed to suspension cables lol.. tf outa here
not in space
As long as you have Sean Buckley leading the team, this project will never succeeded. Ask him about the beam