Labour Party | Leadership Battle | Silkin, Healey and Tony Benn Debate | 1981

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 вер 2018
  • At a fringe meeting at the TUC Conference in Blackpool this evening the three contenders for the Labour Party Deputy Leadership will speak from the same platform for the first time.
    Tony Benn,. Denis Healey and John Silkin will each state their case TV EYE will be there to see and hear them and to gauge audience reaction.
    First shown: 10/09/1981
    If you would like to license a clip from this video please e mail:
    archive@fremante.com
    Quote: VT25277

КОМЕНТАРІ • 91

  • @politicalphilosophy-thegre3894
    @politicalphilosophy-thegre3894 3 роки тому +17

    7:31: Denis Healey starts speaking
    7:46 Heckling starts

  • @petermutua9838
    @petermutua9838 2 роки тому +13

    I am constantly amazed by the dynamism of U.K. politics over the last 250 years. It makes me realize how young my own country's democracy is..

    • @ds1868
      @ds1868 Рік тому +2

      Politics goes much further back than 250 years. The first Parliament met in 1264. The first Speaker of the House of Commons elected 1377. The English Civil War of 1645-49 was the most political war in history: who should be in charge, the King or Parliament? 250 years is nothing in the political history of the UK.

  • @tonymcmahon_historybear
    @tonymcmahon_historybear 2 роки тому +17

    Gosh - these politicians are giants compared to the mediocre social media click baiters we have now :(

    • @rogersweet3608
      @rogersweet3608 19 днів тому

      Oh yessss absolutely!!!!
      Pathetic these days!

    • @rogersweet3608
      @rogersweet3608 19 днів тому

      Healey and Kinnock Blair were/are traitors!

  • @petermutua9838
    @petermutua9838 2 роки тому +7

    Another interesting aspect is that people are smoking openly in the audience 😅😅😅... can't imagine that happening today...

    • @politicalphilosophy-thegre3894
      @politicalphilosophy-thegre3894 2 роки тому

      People got tired of losing the equivalent of £20 billion a year in today's money in lost productivity, NHS costs, sickness pay etc for cancer patients and hospital treatment. About 25 times what it spends on public libraries. Society grows up eventually.

  • @bunkerbill
    @bunkerbill 5 років тому +13

    Excellent upload.

  • @MrDavey2010
    @MrDavey2010 4 роки тому +24

    Each candidate was powerful and authoritative. Much more than any of the current Labour candidates.

    • @robdewey317
      @robdewey317 3 роки тому +3

      They were losers rejected by the voters repeatedly until 1997

    • @kailashpatel1706
      @kailashpatel1706 3 роки тому +4

      @@robdewey317 Benn and Healey were part of winning Labour governments..

    • @politicalphilosophy-thegre3894
      @politicalphilosophy-thegre3894 Рік тому +1

      @@robdewey317 As were successive Tory governments, who received only 43% of the vote at the highest.

    • @MagicNash89
      @MagicNash89 Рік тому +2

      @@kailashpatel1706 They were - when the Labour party was waaay different than what is presented in this video. And for that reason technically they are the losers.

    • @stephenholmes1036
      @stephenholmes1036 9 місяців тому

      ​@robdewey317 not Denis Healey

  • @jonathanmontgomery5178
    @jonathanmontgomery5178 5 років тому +15

    Dennis Healey was ferocious. Wow.

    • @briandelaney9710
      @briandelaney9710 3 роки тому +1

      He was a bully

    • @ysgol3
      @ysgol3 2 роки тому

      @@briandelaney9710 And far less clever than is somehow now generally thought - in particular he had no political imagination.

    • @Nekrosmas
      @Nekrosmas Рік тому

      You mean Dennis Healy, the Chancellor that brought the country from 27% inflation and economic destruction to 10% inflation and stable growth within a year?
      Give me a fucking break loony lefties. Dennis Healy is ten times the politician and intellectual to Tony Benn.

    • @jonnobloggs8642
      @jonnobloggs8642 Рік тому +5

      The left hated Healy .He was not afraid to challenge their agenda and on many occasions deliberately antagonised his detractors with his speeches.

  • @NPA1001
    @NPA1001 4 роки тому +24

    Tony Benn allowed to speak... Healy shouted down by the thugs... things don’t change.

    • @billjohnson2081
      @billjohnson2081 3 роки тому +13

      To Healey's credit he appears unfazed. Some of the old socialist toughness that has disappeared under the influence of liberal creep within the left.

    • @TwilightParasites
      @TwilightParasites Рік тому +5

      @@billjohnson2081 Guys who have fought Nazis are not fazed by much.

  • @tay2229
    @tay2229 17 днів тому

    1:51 This is notable, because Benn's deputy leadership challenge has, in hindsight, been widely seen as a defacto challenge to Foot's leadership.

  • @drooky123
    @drooky123 4 роки тому +15

    no labour here, but i have to say all that was missing from Denis Healey's speech was the mic drop at the end. boom, impressive.

  • @christopherlane2552
    @christopherlane2552 2 роки тому +7

    Denis Healey always loyal to the Government in which he served. Unlike Benn

  • @stuartwilliams-fw4vo
    @stuartwilliams-fw4vo 6 місяців тому

    What a marvellous summer of entertainment that deputy leadership contest was! Kinnock’s betrayal did for Wedgwood Benn in the end.

    • @marcokite
      @marcokite 5 місяців тому +1

      that's the Lord Viscount Stansgate to you!

  • @bhikkubodhi
    @bhikkubodhi 7 місяців тому +1

    Interesting Benn praising OMOV despite the left fighting it’s introduction tooth and nail as ‘pseudo democracy’ and that the members weren’t sufficiently “politically educated”. The behaviour of supporters in the hall resonates now as well.

    • @marcokite
      @marcokite 5 місяців тому +1

      Socialists have never been keen on democracy

  • @user-qd3xk9ge7h
    @user-qd3xk9ge7h 2 місяці тому +1

    Real labour

  • @ow4744
    @ow4744 2 роки тому +4

    I must say, watching this, it's clear why John Silkin did not get many votes. Squeezed between two excellent orators!

  • @jhjhjhjhjhjhify
    @jhjhjhjhjhjhify 2 роки тому +7

    I suppose this was the beginning of the slow decline of the Labour Party. Most of the more discerning thinkers were either dying off or retiring by this point. Quite frankly regardless of whether you think they're the lesser of two evils or not, the majority of Labour MPs... well, they leave a lot to be desired nowadays...

    • @rogersweet3608
      @rogersweet3608 Рік тому +1

      All parties have lack of principle and quality today
      It's all greasy careerist pole
      Gone in a flash

  • @GeorgeI996
    @GeorgeI996 Рік тому +1

    Wow, compare these pioneers with the clowns we have now. ‘On the shoulders of giants’

  • @nickharris9761
    @nickharris9761 9 місяців тому +2

    If PR was implemented replacing FPTP, Labour would spilt.

  • @___UN
    @___UN 2 роки тому +1

    interesting

  • @kushsakhu
    @kushsakhu 3 місяці тому

    I see some of the comments speaking about the decline of the labour movement post this period.
    However, none of the comments address the role that corporations and lobbies play in deciding elections. Indeed, modern politicians talk about democracy which simply means the choice to vote.
    But the money behind the candidates is the real driving force of modern democracy and we have no say in that space. Big respect to Tony Benn A politician with integrity and attractive intellectual rigour.

  • @yetidodger6650
    @yetidodger6650 Рік тому +1

    compere these to the absolute shower we have now, Sir Keef Starmer the dictator .

  • @2whitsbury
    @2whitsbury 5 років тому +6

    Was that Corbyn standing giving Benn an ovation at the back of the hall?

    • @EgoShredder
      @EgoShredder 5 років тому

      At 6:47 into the video? I'd say no but others may know better than I.

    • @jackhadroom4540
      @jackhadroom4540 5 років тому +13

      Corbyn wasn't a MP in 1981. He was probably at an IRA love-in anyway.

    • @michaelcorkery3853
      @michaelcorkery3853 5 років тому +1

      I think it's Jack Dromey

    • @conveyor2
      @conveyor2 4 роки тому +2

      @@jackhadroom4540 Those are mainly delegates in the hall, not just MPs.

    • @grayssportsalmanac85
      @grayssportsalmanac85 4 роки тому

      Nothing like Corbyn.

  • @Ray-xh6gb
    @Ray-xh6gb Рік тому +1

    Dennis Healey bilderberg

  • @jayd4ever
    @jayd4ever 2 роки тому

    different kind

  • @yorkiephil7744
    @yorkiephil7744 2 роки тому +13

    Benn - magnificent oratory but totally wrong as history proved.

  • @melstocks537
    @melstocks537 2 роки тому

    9

  • @callumclark4021
    @callumclark4021 Рік тому +5

    Standing ovation by the far left for Tony Benn, cheering on their unelectibility like blubbering seals in the same way the Corbynista's did (and still do). Labour are a sad deluded party- always have, always will.

  • @wilsonfisk6626
    @wilsonfisk6626 3 роки тому +3

    Dream Ticket: Tony Benn, leader Dennis Skinner deputy leader... Neil Kinnock, janitor

    • @ThomasDanielsen1000
      @ThomasDanielsen1000 2 роки тому +12

      Yeah, dream ticket for the Tories!

    • @wilsonfisk6626
      @wilsonfisk6626 2 роки тому

      @@ThomasDanielsen1000 Tories would've dumped Thatcher after an '83 loss. They'd have saved themselves a big headache by getting rid of her.

    • @npe1
      @npe1 2 роки тому +3

      @@wilsonfisk6626 But they didn't lose in '83 and you're living in cloud cuckoo land if you think Benn/Skinner would have beaten Thatcher. Typical hard left romanticist, it's people like you that kept the Tories in power for 18 years and still keep them there today.

    • @notsuretbh7215
      @notsuretbh7215 2 роки тому +1

      Key phrase a "dream" ticket

    • @TwilightParasites
      @TwilightParasites Рік тому

      @@notsuretbh7215 Labour had plenty of chances to take Benn as leader. He lost. Fact is he was terrible at great at getting left together terrible at appealing to the centre so he failed. Benn was way way worse at practical politics than Michael Foot, Healey or Kinnock. However his great virtue was honesty. You knew where he stood also true of Healey.

  • @stephenholmes1036
    @stephenholmes1036 24 дні тому +2

    Benn a hypocrite

  • @tubularbill
    @tubularbill 4 роки тому +12

    Benn the Corbyn of his day....

    • @stevebbuk
      @stevebbuk 3 роки тому +1

      They are not comparable in their eloquence, and I lost respect for Corbyn with regard to the European issue.

    • @briandelaney9710
      @briandelaney9710 3 роки тому +2

      Much greater than Corbyn !!!

    • @ThomasDanielsen1000
      @ThomasDanielsen1000 2 роки тому +6

      Benn was a charismatic left-wing nutter, Corbyn is just a left-wing nutter.

    • @stevebbuk
      @stevebbuk 2 роки тому +1

      @@ThomasDanielsen1000 It's a different society you end up with, but he wasn't a nutter. I deeply regret his comment on the death of David James Wilkie, which for many will have confirmed the remark you made.

    • @grahamnancledra7036
      @grahamnancledra7036 Рік тому +1

      Tony Benn was a giant of a man compared to what Corbyn is.

  • @jackhadroom4540
    @jackhadroom4540 5 років тому +5

    I stopped listening when Healey said 'comrades'.

    • @stephenelkington4971
      @stephenelkington4971 5 років тому +19

      The you're a small minded fool - Dennis Healey had an awesome intellect and would have been a truly great Prime Minister.

    • @ac1dP1nk
      @ac1dP1nk 4 роки тому +3

      ​@@stephenelkington4971 there is no evidence of that he was/is very gaitskellesque a gravitas of unexcitability and a worldly confidence. they might make for an interesting friend or university tutor but politicians are defined by their policy proposals and their conduct in office and his positions are mired in handwringing about the lefts unelectability and the consensus of the post-war triangulation that collapsed when the tories stopped playing. What im saying is he would fail to meet expectations regarding his intellect as surprisingly an all powerful technocrat is unable to reverse longstanding social ills in at most a decade. Obama is the arch example of this who i would argue is a match for Healeys intellect along with his superhuman charisma. He foundered with the same policy proposals and attitude of engaging in a convivial debate with fair minded worthy opponents than the reality of duplicitous bastards.

    • @briandelaney9710
      @briandelaney9710 3 роки тому +2

      That was the language within the party

  • @richardlaversuch9460
    @richardlaversuch9460 5 років тому

    Speaking approximately, the House of Lords membership is chosen by God.

  • @liamb8644
    @liamb8644 2 роки тому +2

    13:25 unfortunately for them, they kept the Tories in until almost the end of the century.

    • @briandelaney9710
      @briandelaney9710 Рік тому

      Well, part of the fault was with the SDP who divided the vote

  • @ysgol3
    @ysgol3 3 роки тому +9

    Healey was a blustering bully, dressed himself up as an intellectual but he was just another mediocre unimaginative right winger.

    • @dawngutteridge9964
      @dawngutteridge9964 3 роки тому +18

      You try and give anyone else the job of chancellor in 76, they’d cripple, respect this Titan of the labour movement

    • @briandelaney9710
      @briandelaney9710 3 роки тому +2

      He was a very able Cabinet minister but yes , he was a bully and yes, the Right had run out of ideas

    • @ysgol3
      @ysgol3 2 роки тому

      @@dawngutteridge9964 Of course they wouldn't have, Crosland would have been far better than Healey for example.