I don’t even know what to believe anymore because I heard Richard said Philip Carlo was a weasel, but then he invited him to be the best man at his wedding, so I’m not really sure what their relationship was like (??). I don’t think Richard would “reveal” himself or his inner thought process to Philip, or to anyone, but then again maybe he would 🤔
When you hear this from someone that wrote a 559 pages book about him, that had recorded conversetions with him, that even has a picture with him... There's no doubt in my mind he is more than SURE about the 4O of murders. I always knew he killed more than 14 people but I never had an accurate real amount. Thank you for this video my man!!!
Philip Carlo, wrote Richard's story in a book, helped provide information in the Netflix documentary, managed to speak with Richard many times and even took a picture with him, I do believe that there were 40 people, in other documentaries, Murders were recorded in Los Angeles but they thought they were from some gang or other criminals, but when Richard killed the old woman at night everything was very frequent and since the investigators were still in doubt they thought it was other criminals and that each case was different situations, but when they found out that the murders were being followed very closely and not far away they got up to suspect that they were from the same person or gang, most of their cases were concentrated in Los angeles, but we recorded that Richard He went to other cities and probably there he committed more cases than this are now unknown
I don't understand why this video is titled the way it is..why are these claims absurd? Carlo spoke with Ramirez for many, many hours in order to write the Nightstalker book. I don't see any reason why Carlo would speak with someone about Ramirez years later and make up lies. I believe Carlo's statements unless there is strong evidence that he is a liar or Ramirez didn't commit the described crimes.
He killed 20 like Ramirez his self said. He did attack a couple in Arizona he admitted to Carrillo. Only after being pressed he also said he'd talk about murders they didn't know about when things died down. But 20 is an accurate number of homicides. In addition to his victims who survived his count is not as low as it's made to seem. He's every bit as prolific as Bundy or Gacy just in a shorter time. If he had gone one more year who knows.
@@UKProperPrepper There were not he said 20 multiple times. And this was Before we found out about Mei Liung. When people still wondered how he got to 20. If u check all the names of his victims who didn't survive. Including the Pans and Caldwell sisters and the little girl it's 20 like he bragged. If you know more let me know.
@@jonathandoe2316 I believe Hreta Isoma, 7/14/1981 and Francis DeAlvis, 8/16/1984. An old friend of his says he also killed a homeless person in El Paso and that his first victim was in 1979.
i would agree on the more r4apes since some people won’t come forward out of shame/embarrassment and the whole ordeal being traumatic but i honestly don’t see richard k1lling* 20+ people alone . If he did then he must’ve had an accomplice .
@@staywokeinthesestreets he spoke about doing a ritual but never trusted people so he didn’t go again . Also he was a full blown loner with hardly any friends about from a few homeless people but yes maybe he did commit all those murd3rss alone .
@@staywokeinthesestreets There was many sketches that did not look like Richard and even some witnesses described their attacker as blonde , 5’7 with straight hair . A description which doesn’t even match up to Richards appearance .
@@staywokeinthesestreets Definitely, they is no denying richard did commit most of those but for Carlo to claim Richard was responsible for more than 40+ murd3rs* is absurd .
Richard Ramirez himself said he killed 20 people, two of which can be verified outside of the official 14 count from the trial (Ramirez told Frank Falzon, the leading detective in the Bay Area, that he killed the Caldwell sisters on Telegraph Hill, San Fran). That’s 16 verified kills right off the bat, so yeah Ramirez was telling the truth…the number is either 20 or a little above that, perhaps 23. And he could have committed murders in El Paso (if he was wily enough to evade justice in LA for months, what is dust kicker, cowboy El Paso?). Not 40 victims though, Carlo was delirious. 25 at absolute best.
@@llm2712 It happened in 1985 when he was most active. Both of the sisters were elderly, had their throats cut, and were stabbed multiple times. That's exactly how he killed and who he killed. Not to mention Ramirez himself is the one who brought up the crime in the first place. You know goddamn well it was him. End of story.
40 murders he says .. 🤯
I don’t believe it
20 possibly, but not 40 that's insane
@@Hazz12372 I don’t think even Ted Bundy got that high . 40 is astonishing .
@@oralecarrillo4380 yeah bundy killed around 30
I don’t even know what to believe anymore because I heard Richard said Philip Carlo was a weasel, but then he invited him to be the best man at his wedding, so I’m not really sure what their relationship was like (??). I don’t think Richard would “reveal” himself or his inner thought process to Philip, or to anyone, but then again maybe he would 🤔
@@carolitz3 he called him a weasel in the 1997 phone call but his wedding was before that .
When you hear this from someone that wrote a 559 pages book about him, that had recorded conversetions with him, that even has a picture with him... There's no doubt in my mind he is more than SURE about the 4O of murders. I always knew he killed more than 14 people but I never had an accurate real amount.
Thank you for this video my man!!!
I agree with you 100%.
I gree too, thanks!
Philip Carlo, wrote Richard's story in a book, helped provide information in the Netflix documentary, managed to speak with Richard many times and even took a picture with him, I do believe that there were 40 people, in other documentaries, Murders were recorded in Los Angeles but they thought they were from some gang or other criminals, but when Richard killed the old woman at night everything was very frequent and since the investigators were still in doubt they thought it was other criminals and that each case was different situations, but when they found out that the murders were being followed very closely and not far away they got up to suspect that they were from the same person or gang, most of their cases were concentrated in Los angeles, but we recorded that Richard He went to other cities and probably there he committed more cases than this are now unknown
Philip Carlo died a long time ago.
Not sure why people debate Carlo on the 40 number, he knows his stuff.
Well Jennie was a 79 y/o woman
umm excuse me?
lol what does that have to do with the # of people Ramirez killed?@@tiya6727
@1:30 " fuck with me and your dead , resonated in his head"
thank you for that , couldn’t quite pick up what he said .
I don't understand why this video is titled the way it is..why are these claims absurd? Carlo spoke with Ramirez for many, many hours in order to write the Nightstalker book. I don't see any reason why Carlo would speak with someone about Ramirez years later and make up lies. I believe Carlo's statements unless there is strong evidence that he is a liar or Ramirez didn't commit the described crimes.
He killed 20 like Ramirez his self said. He did attack a couple in Arizona he admitted to Carrillo. Only after being pressed he also said he'd talk about murders they didn't know about when things died down. But 20 is an accurate number of homicides. In addition to his victims who survived his count is not as low as it's made to seem. He's every bit as prolific as Bundy or Gacy just in a shorter time. If he had gone one more year who knows.
he did 24
@@UKProperPrepper He bragged 20. And when you check all victims listed he un alived. Add the Caldwell sisters and his first Mei Liung it's 20.
@@jonathandoe2316 there were others.
@@UKProperPrepper There were not he said 20 multiple times. And this was Before we found out about Mei Liung. When people still wondered how he got to 20. If u check all the names of his victims who didn't survive. Including the Pans and Caldwell sisters and the little girl it's 20 like he bragged. If you know more let me know.
@@jonathandoe2316 I believe Hreta Isoma, 7/14/1981 and Francis DeAlvis, 8/16/1984. An old friend of his says he also killed a homeless person in El Paso and that his first victim was in 1979.
Richard LOVE😢😯😔🌹❤🌹 ❤💕❤💕🌹💕🌹❤🌹💌💖💌💕💌💕
How did you get this recording? I hope there is more we can listen to
Bbb
Thank you darling for updating with interesting content 🤟🖤
🤍🤍
40 people killed for a 25 years old boy , what a feat 😱😱
Why dont we have the full tapes of carlo/ramirez tapes? Carlo could make a fortune
Becaus carlo added some seasoning
Carlo died in 2010. Yes we do need to hear all of the tapes.
Carlo gave the tapes to Doreen. Who knows what she's done with them.
He is perfect to look at.
Que alguien ponga subtítulos en español
Wtf this dude is really lying, no? 40??? I believe in 20 and I can believe about children too, but 40?! No.
imo i think he killed 20+ ppl also more r4apes than he was charged
i would agree on the more r4apes since some people won’t come forward out of shame/embarrassment and the whole ordeal being traumatic but i honestly don’t see richard k1lling* 20+ people alone . If he did then he must’ve had an accomplice .
@@oralecarrillo4380 but I do believe he was capable of it since he even wanted to buy a house of his own to torture people:)...
@@staywokeinthesestreets he spoke about doing a ritual but never trusted people so he didn’t go again . Also he was a full blown loner with hardly any friends about from a few homeless people but yes maybe he did commit all those murd3rss alone .
@@staywokeinthesestreets There was many sketches that did not look like Richard and even some witnesses described their attacker as blonde , 5’7 with straight hair . A description which doesn’t even match up to Richards appearance .
@@staywokeinthesestreets Definitely, they is no denying richard did commit most of those but for Carlo to claim Richard was responsible for more than 40+ murd3rs* is absurd .
First was 1979
Was Richard the one speaking?
EXPERTS 😊
Is this Richard talking?
No. Its someone else.
It’s philip carlo speaking
He sounds like him@@oralecarrillo4380
Richard Ramirez himself said he killed 20 people, two of which can be verified outside of the official 14 count from the trial (Ramirez told Frank Falzon, the leading detective in the Bay Area, that he killed the Caldwell sisters on Telegraph Hill, San Fran). That’s 16 verified kills right off the bat, so yeah Ramirez was telling the truth…the number is either 20 or a little above that, perhaps 23. And he could have committed murders in El Paso (if he was wily enough to evade justice in LA for months, what is dust kicker, cowboy El Paso?). Not 40 victims though, Carlo was delirious. 25 at absolute best.
There are no proof for the sisters , no DNA
@@llm2712 It was him, proof or not. Detective Falzon believed him.
@@sparrowprince3432 but How ?? If there are no proof, maybe it’s someone else ?
@@llm2712 It happened in 1985 when he was most active. Both of the sisters were elderly, had their throats cut, and were stabbed multiple times. That's exactly how he killed and who he killed. Not to mention Ramirez himself is the one who brought up the crime in the first place. You know goddamn well it was him. End of story.
Carlo is the one who spent time talking with Ramirez, not us. So I wouldn't call him delirious.