@@kevinski-tcg this is true, but that's also with the ukko that prints free memory in a deck with lots of resources. I firmly believe that the promo is the problem
Mother and tamer should not be choice restricted. It's disruptive to the current dominant decks and gives some other decks the chance to shine they might not get otherwise. For instance: Bugs can't compete with magna, but it absolutely bodies the wall of mother.
I do have my own wishlist, but I'm just going to state when the banlist MIGHT come out. I really hope they don't do it tho: the banlist will come out once jp and global merge into one (which is in march/april next year). I will also say, that if they DO go that route, they will potentially release the biggest banlist in this game ever.
My issue is the Purple Gabumon stuff allowed Purple to go ham for to long. PR Ukkomon + DemiMeramon (purple) is roughly the same thing. Id rather both be limited...purple is what allows Trash.Deck to fly high.
Ukkomon in general is just ruining game design. It’s getting to the point that topping decks will just have Ukkomon, swear AnGa is also on Ukkomon I think.
Also thank you for the Magna X point. Blue base needs this mon to be viable. Bandai needed to not go in with the lore aspect and keep it a vaccine type and just make it free type solely.
@@franciscotorres7638 basically, the cards are unlimited, but you can't include both in the same deck. So I could play 4 magnamon X as long as I don't play patamon
@@TCGTamer man that would actually be awesome.. I would say I have had good luck against vaccine but man that would be great since I am an Magna player
Something I think people forget is that the second ancient and nume get a hit paildramon gets ridiculous. Bt12 exveemon and stingmon are crazy stupid. Play against paildramon with those, return of the primogenitor and ST imperial dragon mode and youll have a great time 🙂
Taunts are fine. Black decks deserve Taunt, they get nothing else. Limit bullshit aces that break the game like Valk. I don't understand why people think that Etemon is the problem when free board wipes and free gg 0 drops are the problem. Aces are cool, but they are not well designed. Their Overflow costs are not balanced around their effects, and that's a massive problem that they bring to the game. Like, how can anyone think 5k blanket board wipe +1 security or kills an 8k both turns on a 0 cost Ace for 4 overflow is even on the same level as "block 1 and trash 1 security" for 4 overflow (BWargreymon ace) is even comparable is beyond me. Ban problematic aces.
I like hitting Ruin Mode. It's too much. I also think hitting T.K. and Louie would accomplish much more than hitting 1 ukkomon and the patamon. The 2 mem play that sets up a +6 play for free? Way more problematic than potentially going +5 on a gacha. Hatching once per turn and getting a search or +1 at start of main is way less problematic than moving two bodies out of raising, a search, and a 3rd hatch for -1 memory.
Heavens needs to go to 0 honestly. There isnt many cards which shouldnt be allowed at 1 but thats one of them. I also think Patamon is much more OP than Geogrey was and Geogrey is banned.
banning ukko would be pointless becuase everyday can run it if the argument is that it gives too much. BT17 lobomon will get restriction, BT11 Takuya needs restriction, BT16 Ken and davis needs restriction. they wont ban an SR again I dont think, but those rares and UC that just lead to roller coaster matches are bananas
I mean, with just four of the promo Ukkomon, Numemon was already an extremely oppressive deck.
@@kevinski-tcg this is true, but that's also with the ukko that prints free memory in a deck with lots of resources. I firmly believe that the promo is the problem
Analogman to 5
@@nairune213 😂😂😂
i started has a blackwatgreymon gaionon player i want greymon x antibody at 4
Mother and tamer should not be choice restricted. It's disruptive to the current dominant decks and gives some other decks the chance to shine they might not get otherwise. For instance: Bugs can't compete with magna, but it absolutely bodies the wall of mother.
I do have my own wishlist, but I'm just going to state when the banlist MIGHT come out. I really hope they don't do it tho: the banlist will come out once jp and global merge into one (which is in march/april next year). I will also say, that if they DO go that route, they will potentially release the biggest banlist in this game ever.
My issue is the Purple Gabumon stuff allowed Purple to go ham for to long. PR Ukkomon + DemiMeramon (purple) is roughly the same thing. Id rather both be limited...purple is what allows Trash.Deck to fly high.
@@kairusaotome95 but we have paladin mode ace now. Trash decks are about to get real bad real quick
@TCGTamer not every deck can make use of Paladin Ace and I rather they dont
@TCGTamer thes deck need balanced cards tailored to them, not abused engines...thats what ruined yugioh.
Ukkomon in general is just ruining game design. It’s getting to the point that topping decks will just have Ukkomon, swear AnGa is also on Ukkomon I think.
Also thank you for the Magna X point. Blue base needs this mon to be viable. Bandai needed to not go in with the lore aspect and keep it a vaccine type and just make it free type solely.
Would love to see Gabu x anti @4 again
What are choice restrictions?
Sorry I'm still new to Digimon
@@franciscotorres7638 basically, the cards are unlimited, but you can't include both in the same deck. So I could play 4 magnamon X as long as I don't play patamon
@@TCGTamer man that would actually be awesome..
I would say I have had good luck against vaccine but man that would be great since I am an Magna player
I think banning/limiting Marcus is silly. Shinegreymon needs that marcus to function
When is banlist?
Something I think people forget is that the second ancient and nume get a hit paildramon gets ridiculous. Bt12 exveemon and stingmon are crazy stupid. Play against paildramon with those, return of the primogenitor and ST imperial dragon mode and youll have a great time 🙂
Taunts are fine. Black decks deserve Taunt, they get nothing else.
Limit bullshit aces that break the game like Valk. I don't understand why people think that Etemon is the problem when free board wipes and free gg 0 drops are the problem.
Aces are cool, but they are not well designed. Their Overflow costs are not balanced around their effects, and that's a massive problem that they bring to the game.
Like, how can anyone think 5k blanket board wipe +1 security or kills an 8k both turns on a 0 cost Ace for 4 overflow is even on the same level as "block 1 and trash 1 security" for 4 overflow (BWargreymon ace) is even comparable is beyond me.
Ban problematic aces.
I like hitting Ruin Mode. It's too much. I also think hitting T.K. and Louie would accomplish much more than hitting 1 ukkomon and the patamon. The 2 mem play that sets up a +6 play for free? Way more problematic than potentially going +5 on a gacha. Hatching once per turn and getting a search or +1 at start of main is way less problematic than moving two bodies out of raising, a search, and a 3rd hatch for -1 memory.
Tai stop putting Ukkomon in every deck
No, you can't make me
@@TCGTamer watch me baby 😉
Some firmly milquetoast takes here chief, gonna have to go cringe on this one.
@@enigmaticheart666 lol what does that mean?
Heavens needs to go to 0 honestly. There isnt many cards which shouldnt be allowed at 1 but thats one of them. I also think Patamon is much more OP than Geogrey was and Geogrey is banned.
Geogrey isn't banned
You obviously know what I meant. Restricted to 1 @@blakepowell1504
banning ukko would be pointless becuase everyday can run it if the argument is that it gives too much. BT17 lobomon will get restriction, BT11 Takuya needs restriction, BT16 Ken and davis needs restriction. they wont ban an SR again I dont think, but those rares and UC that just lead to roller coaster matches are bananas