Deleuze and Spinoza: Practical Philosophy and Process Ontology
Вставка
- Опубліковано 13 тра 2024
- Deleuze can be seen as one of the most important thinkers of the 20th century. His (and Guattarri's) ideas on deterritorialization, multiplicities, the rhizome, speed, and others create new philosophical narratives that pierce the veil of metaphysics. Something deemed half-way obsolete by many in the 20th century. Here we explore his metaphysical relationship with arguably his largest influence. That being Spinoza.
This entire channel is funded by you all. If this channel is something you enjoy, supporting keeps it alive. You'll receive early access to videos, exclusive content, discord access, editing tutorials, and more! / epochphilosophy
Same exact perks if you prefer to support via the UA-cam member section:
/ @epochphilosophy
Spinoza: Practical Philosophy here: amzn.to/3ddE694
If you want to support the channel for free, use the amazon affiliate link, this helps us IMMENSELY: amzn.to/32hdeQB
Socials:
Twitter► / epochphilosophy
Instagram► / epochphilosophy
Timestamp:
Intro: 0:00
Spinoza's Intimacy: 03:55
The Ethics: 8:10
Bodies, Consciousness, Beyond Morality: 11:00
Affecting the World and Process: 13:55
A Message: 21:50
Hi, everyone! Thanks so much for watching! As always, I truly could not make these videos without Patreon and UA-cam Members. These videos take a ton of time and resources to create, and direct support from you is exactly how I am able to do it! Consider pledging a few bucks a month to keep this going! Give early access, discord access, editing tutorials, etc. If so kind, pledge here: www.patreon.com/epochphilosophy
oh no, did you mean to say descartes at 6:58? D:
@@TheJayman213 Nope. That's supposed to be Spinoza. Spinoza doesn't reject a distinction between mind and body, just doesn't see them truly separate as Descartes.
Deleuze is like a therapy session where you're on the most potent mushrooms imaginable and you're also your own French shaman
Riiiiight
What does France have to do with it?
@@thenowchurch6419 the french were spitting bars in the 20th century. Post structuralism is so french. So being a french shaman def makes sense in that context
@@RupturedGrid Yeah, I can see that.
Post Structuralism as a 20th century French Shamanic quest.
Lmao "Jyles Dellooze"
Is it relevant how one `mis-`pronounces a name? My name gets `boo`-tchered frequently + as a nonnative speaker I fail to pronounce names/words often without losing meaning (from the participant's and one-self perspective)
much love
@@juliozz59 relevant? Probably not. Funny? Yes.
My thoughts exactly lololol
Žil dəløz, when I went to school 🏫. Yankees not know how to know. Ten minutes research on the Internet is too much trouble.
Many times "phil. youtube" is filled with bad interpretations of many authors ideas and arguments, but certainly this is NOT the case. Awesome video!
I've noticed a lot of UA-cam regarding philosophy seems to be 'pop-culture' philosophy if that makes sense. If it's not, it tends to be really dull, dry, non-inspiring slideshow videos lol. Which are great, but I'm hoping to bridge the artistic video gap with something that actually delves into core ideas.
@@epochphilosophy Rockin' it
/Gill-Deluzz/
Jyle-Daylose
/ Jiy-Delöz /
Fail lol
No.
Delhaize
I was drawn in because I think of myself as a Spinoza fanboy and am now going through all of your videos. This channel is a fantastic find.
This is fantastic; I ordered Deleuze’s text on Spinoza the other day, and have a copy of “theological-political treatise” sitting in my bookshelf....never interacted with him before, so stoked to start digging into it. Thanks again for the video dude
Very kind comment. Thanks a ton!
Keep it up man, you're making me smarter with each vid
On god 🤣
Whether intentional or otherwise, I find it ironic that the common background throughout the video (floating particles over a black background) resemble the glass dust that would ultimately lead to Spinoza’s death.
Thank you for finally covering this fascinating topic
Everyone and by everyone I mean everyone should read Spinoza . He is the greatest to ever do it . Read the whole book and you will see how he anticipates subsequently majority of modern academia .
In which ways does Spinoza anticipate modern academia?
@Mustuffa _CIV9_9 There's truth to what you say here. While I wouldn't characterize Spinoza's philosophy as cheap, it's important to understand, as you have pointed out, that Spinoza is a rationalist and mystic, very much like a Neoplatonist. His philosophy has very little in common with contemporary philosophy.
Freud , Einstein , Deleuze , Foucault want more ?
@@pradyumansingh7575 In which way does he anticipate any of them?
@Mustuffa _CIV9_9 Einstein believed in Spinoza's kind of god. Also, Schopenhaur and most of german and european philosophy and poetry originated from Buddhism or Upnishads or other texts.
Another brilliant piece of work! Thanks for this.
Plot twist: The two people from the comment section still unsubscribed for you mispronouncing Gilles ("Jill") Deleuze ;)
for you 😏
I just subbed ... love this channel!
The way you truly bring forth the essence of what makes these ideas so profound through your visual effects and music is absolutely incredible.
Thank you for not only bringing philosophy to us in a digestible manner, but also for making it interesting, captivating, and enthralling.
Thanks a ton. Such a kind comment. Never thought about it in terms of 'essence' but that makes sense. I try to make it as artistically captivating as possible.
Loved it. I try to explain this stuff to not-philosophically-educated people and I just end up doing something like the blanket scene from I Heart Huckabee's. Now I can outsource the work to this vid.
Thank for make these types of videos.
Yooo thank you for this man
I really needed this. ✊
The art of trying to understand (and not moralize) really is that, an art. Or it atleast requires it. And/or an art that takes a ton of practice.
Makes life a lot better though. I think we owe a debt to Deleuze for this.
Thank you so much for this :) This video is helping me to understand what seems to understand some of Bhaskar's Critical Realism.
This is incredible
another incredible one i have a feeling your channel is gonna get big
I love your videos dude!
Hat mir sehr gefallen und ist sehr gut gemacht.
Bangin vid dude! Well done PCE
This is an awesome summary
The pronunciation of Gilles gave me whiplash. Great vid tho
I was pretty salty that this got selected over Chomsky's Syntactic Structures, but now after watching the video, I think this was good. Thanks. Hopefully we get the syntactic structures video soon!
Nope! It actually wasn't. Two different polls luckily for you!
Excellent video, please consider making one on Deleuze and Guattari's Thousand Plateaus, would be very much appreciated and used in class
Yup. Absolutely love Pills. Did a video on Anti-Oedipus as well. I may have to leave A Thousand Plateau's to him.
Atleast for now. Later in the future I want to do explicit D&G stuff.
@@epochphilosophy Or take What is Philosophy, I think this will connect very well with this video, and draw great interest
Great video. Clear account. Interesting film footage in the background. It wasn’t distracting, actually.
Excellent video
was ontology really considered dead? Cybernetics brings up plenty of new ideas in process philosophy - is Deleuze really the first guy to have explored that? I've been thinking about the implications of cybernetics for ages, I assumed it would be well-worn ground in academia by now.
Awesome!! Keep it up
I love Deleuze and Spinoza and this video is pure love
Thank you very much 👏😊
more than 2 people now ! thanks so much, great video.
Really wonderful video! It's funny, I'd never delved into Spinoza but have obviously encountered and been influenced by people he's influenced because I found myself thinking, wow that's exactly my view of the world, at lots of points in the video
Outstanding
Great video! One thing I don't understood about Deleuze was this (maybe someone can help): Deleuze embraced Spinoza's immanence, but starts to differ from Spinoza when he claims God is of the modes. At the end of Difference and Repetition he says to "Turn the modes around." It seems that he is turning against the unity of Spinoza's God in favor of Difference? I'd appreciate if someone could help. (Again great video and the editing was amazing!)
Thanks man! this video makes me want to make a second account and like it once more
good work.
amazing video
background music is pretty slick
Daily watch. In the trinity with plastic pills video on Deleuze/ Nietzsche and the then and now video on the rhizome
Cracking stuff... have an affect 🤘🕶🤘
Definitely gonna need to watch this one a few times to get everything lol
Is there any way to access the sources you drew on for this video? I'd love to get more into this, but I wasn't sure if I should just dive into the Ethics, or what works of Deleuze are connected to this topic, etc.
Really my only two sources for this were Spinoza's Ethics, and Deleuze's Spinoza: Practical Philosophy.
Thanks!
Good Video .👍🏻
I would love a video on whitehead please!!!!
All philosophy is measurable, the essence of basic physics, not in the distraction of metaphysics or quantum physics opinions which sits in the realm of theology, thank you.
The magic and sorcery of word casting, spelling unveiled reflects the Natural law, cosmic law, universal law of also plagiarised Hermetic principles all saying the same things when unpacked I feel in the addition of generative force which being the 8th principle. ALL is mind, UNIverse is mental, ALL(substance, infinite and immutable) is all (aptitudes, modes, finite and mutable) but all can never be ALL, DaVinci is the Mona Lisa but the Mona Lisa can never be DaVinci as an analogy . Spirit mind circuit we are all connected. Hegel in affect of his dialectic is observed in the decline of our civilisation by the tyrant and priest projectionist . No freewill exists in the cave with the only freewill being love or fear of which all else is born
Woah does this mean I can threaten to unsubscribe and get an Agamben video :0
......... fuck
gl queen i believe in u o7
Thanks
Reminds me of Daoism and other versions of non-dualism. It's interesting to see how people coming from different directions seem to end up in the same place.
JAAILS DELOUZ
(sorry for rant but Gilles is pronounced as the french J (Je m'appelle..) + the english word 'eel' with the vowel being a bit shorter)
edit: guess I was being a priest huh
🔥🔥🔥
I kept thinking of william blake towards the end, though my knowledge of his works is limited.
Where's the link to the podcast?
1:40. Right from the gitgo, I find it telling that evolution is never brought into a consideration of "What is a Tree?" Why is Evolution so rarely brought into these discussion of "What is real" or the 'consciousness question', etc.? Can anyone help explain that for me?
I really think if anyone tackled this question of evolution in discussions of what things are it’s Deluze. His theory of identity via repetition and imperfect repetition I think incorporates this struggle. I would recommend the channel Then and Now who did a very good introduction to Deluze that I think addressed this.
Materialists
God this channel is awesome
thank uuuu
Those two commenters threatening to unsubscribe have done us a huge favour, shout out to them
Jyles Dilooze
The hole in spinozas jacket was from being attacked by a man from his early community on the street after getting excommunicated
Reading Deleuze is like "Oh God how did I not see this before"
Gyles?
you sound like nathan fielder
This sorta reminds me of Adhishankara's Advaita Vedanta
Great Video! (besides that butchered pronunciation of Gilles which can only be compared to the pronunciation of Wagner in birth of tragedy)
"Jeyeles deleuze"
Stopped the video; closed the browser; turned off the computer; called the philosophy police; got told to "fuck off."
ohboyherewego
Gilles: "Jzeel" - like "feel" beginning with a "jzh".
Thank you for the explication.
There is much useful insight in Deleuze but the antinomianism he keeps stressing , as did Nietzsche before him, is a poison in his ointment.
to pronounce Gilles
say "fudge"
hold on to the "dge"
Then say "Jill" with "dge" in place of "J"
you're welcome
Gilles is not pronounced like that...
But how can you find the essence of your consciousness is constantly expanding away from your self?
Spinoza's ethics is similar to Smakhaya Philosophy.
Hi
Hello
Hi
Umm ELI5 for us non-philosophers?
Great video! But I'm pretty sure Deleuze is pononced delöz
Pls try to put subtitles in romanian. Thx!
giles??
Damn dude...
A friend of mine said that spinoza is deleuze waifu
God damn we live in weird times
@@epochphilosophy we do
Nice content btw
My problem with mainstream faiths is that they put 'god' in some unknowable place. While philosophers such as Spinoza, Adi Shankara, meister Eckhart, and Ibn Arabi (Jewish, Hindu, christian and Muslim) all said Look! God is in everything you see! And you are a part of that! It's beautiful to realize this in ordinary, daily life actually. It gives life so much more meaning.
@@thotslayer9914 100%
There is understanding only if there is law.
Jials Deleuze
this is like some indian philosophy
Not only, and maybe not by accident.
Same as Ibn Arabi and meister eckhart
and another comment for the algorithm
Another comment for the algorithm
Good video but... you gotta work on your pronunciation of French names.
Nope. Jyles.
Do you think the concept of the Nash equilibrium qualifies as a sad passion?
Unfamiliar with that, unfortunately.
@@epochphilosophy People normally talk about it in terms of how in the "prisoners dilemma" it is better to talk to the cops and get a lower sentence because you can't trust your accomplices. Very influential idea.
The substance being consciousness, enter analytic idealism.
Some of these mills your showing need some realignment LOL. One was wiggling all over the place
It's pronounced "Jill" with soft J and L, not "JYLEZ"
have you read "the fascism of the potatoe"?
ridiculous shit that went down in last century academia
How can you be so smart and not even bother to pronounce his name correctly?
There are some problems with your explanation of Spinoza's thought and extension here. They most certainly aren't modes, and they can't be reduced to senses.
This reminds me of the Dao!?
Same old mysticism, it's all the same across the board.
dao Is about non-dualism opposed to dualism
deleuze is about "it doesn even matter to say dualism or monism"
pluralism=monism as every dualism is not refused but is twisted, composed, created in always creative line of flight
Reasons to learn English