Jean Baudrillard: The System of Objects

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 кві 2024
  • Baudrillard stands as one of the most influential and relevant thinkers of the later 20th century. Best known for his work Simulacra and Simulation, Baudrillard's intellectual career started with The System of Objects. A book that sought to analyze the newly emerging world of sign-value, and the material rupture of early serial commodities. Baudrillard sought to bring a structural, material analysis with newer fields such as semiotics and social psychoanalysis as to give a new lens to 20th-century capitalism. As The System of Objects developed from his Ph.D. thesis, it serves as a relatively quiet, yet important piece of philosophy that helped shape late 20th-century thought.
    Buy The System of Objects here: amzn.to/39ZKVK8
    This entire channel is funded by you all. If this channel is something you enjoy, anything helps: / epochphilosophy
    Join to get access to exclusive videos, early access, and in credit shoutouts:
    / @epochphilosophy
    If you want to support the channel for free, use the amazon affiliate link, this helps us IMMENSELY: amzn.to/32hdeQB
    Join our community on Discord:
    / discord
    Socials:
    Twitter► / epochphilosophy
    Instagram► / epochphilosophy
    Timestamp:
    Intro: 0:00
    Ideological Home & Interior Design: 2:53
    Functionalism to the Symbolic: 5:00
    Antiques & Collections: 7:49
    Serial Motivation and a Lack: 10:38
    New Language, Advertising and Credit: 16:02
    A Message: 20:20

КОМЕНТАРІ • 181

  • @epochphilosophy
    @epochphilosophy  3 роки тому +35

    Hey, friends! Just wanted to stop by and say that none of this would be possible without Patreon and the UA-cam Member section. These videos take a ton of time and effort to make, and UA-cam pays very little. Thus, Patreon is a huge necessity for our survival. If you can spare a few bucks a month, you'd guarantee more videos for the future! Plus, depending on the tiers, you get early access, exclusive content, etc. Anything you can do helps immensely! Appreciate all of you.
    Patreon: www.patreon.com/epochphilosophy
    Membership: ua-cam.com/channels/738SsV6BSLUVvMgKnEFFzQ.htmljoin

    • @Assasinsweed
      @Assasinsweed 3 роки тому +3

      So much great content on this channel and I would like it to continue. So I'll pledge on patreon. Keep up the good work mate.

    • @epochphilosophy
      @epochphilosophy  3 роки тому +3

      @@Assasinsweed Thanks so much. Genuinely means a ton!

    • @N05Y573M
      @N05Y573M 2 роки тому +1

      This is great material 👏👏
      It's amazing how it almost describes what a phylosophy of NFT's could sounds like. The dialectic of NFT's.🗝️

  • @SPACEDOUT19
    @SPACEDOUT19 3 роки тому +82

    This was my entry point into philosophy, just bought it summer 2019, didnt understand everything (cause english is also not my native language), but im glad i bought it and read it

    • @epochphilosophy
      @epochphilosophy  3 роки тому +30

      It's a pretty difficult and dense read to say the least. But, very significant at examining production and consumption and it's relative change.
      We try to make difficult stuff easy to understand over here!

    • @joeyyc8515
      @joeyyc8515 Рік тому +3

      It was one of my entries into Philosophy as well, albeit 13 years ago. It’s good to also study Baudrillard’s source material: an individual named Friedrich Nietzsche

  • @caymuscairns6845
    @caymuscairns6845 3 роки тому +20

    This channel makes me question everything, this video makes me want to start a commune.

  • @samarthkhandelwal3703
    @samarthkhandelwal3703 3 роки тому +61

    Ironic that I got 3 ads during this video

    • @wildernessisland2573
      @wildernessisland2573 3 роки тому +7

      Were they all a part of the same series of commodified objects?

    • @moch.farisdzulfiqar6123
      @moch.farisdzulfiqar6123 3 роки тому +3

      UA-cam algorithm give you a case study

    • @ageofbumfires5216
      @ageofbumfires5216 7 місяців тому +1

      From Wells Fargo no less lol

    • @CapnSnackbeard
      @CapnSnackbeard 7 місяців тому +3

      There are 3 kinds of UA-cam viewers in this world: people who pay for UA-cam Premium, those who use an ad blocker, and those who watch ads.

  • @emmanuelalozie5812
    @emmanuelalozie5812 3 роки тому +38

    I’m definitely adding The System of Objects to my reading list. Moving from market himanism
    To self-realization is something I have definitely noticed as of late with the rise of social media.

    • @anonymoushuman8344
      @anonymoushuman8344 Рік тому +8

      😎 You've in fact added The System of Objects to your reading list, but you're also aware of this as an example of serial motivation, correct? Ha!

  • @cobbanon5778
    @cobbanon5778 3 роки тому +39

    This is terrific. I would love to see your perspective on Fredric Jameson, otherwise keep up the good work!

  • @Knaeben
    @Knaeben 2 роки тому +19

    Your content is outstanding. Every video is well-presented and non-condescending. I always finish either feeling like I have learned something, or at least sparked ideas.

  • @0x400Bogdan
    @0x400Bogdan 2 роки тому +1

    I like that your videos are fast-paced. I don’t need to increase the speed in UA-cam. Thank you for keeping this in mind.

  • @canderousordo8271
    @canderousordo8271 3 роки тому +20

    Maybe your best video yet. Baudrillard is sometimes hard to read and always hard to understand, yet you present it in a very understandable manner.

    • @MargaritaMagdalena
      @MargaritaMagdalena 10 місяців тому +3

      He's always hard to read and hard to understand.

    • @CC3GROUNDZERO
      @CC3GROUNDZERO 4 місяці тому

      @@MargaritaMagdalena Compared to what? Heidegger?

    • @MargaritaMagdalena
      @MargaritaMagdalena 4 місяці тому

      @@CC3GROUNDZERO Compared to most texts.

  • @scowlistic
    @scowlistic 2 роки тому +1

    Not for the faint of heart, at least not the full video in one sitting. Excellent work man, thank you.

  • @sjorskattenbelt4384
    @sjorskattenbelt4384 2 роки тому +2

    Watched the intro, this is going to be good. You give a good summary of what is about to come, accompanied by a nice voice recorded with a decent mic. This is going to be a great help for my essay. Especially since you use citations and interpreted them afterwards.

  • @LogicGated
    @LogicGated 2 роки тому +1

    Man the music really adds to the video experience, great work!

  • @beaubolieu
    @beaubolieu Рік тому +4

    This is a great video! Thank you. I couldn’t find this phrase “sorcerer(s) of atmosphere” 5:03 in the text, but it’s a great phrase and I wish he had! He does mention “engineer of atmosphere” in a context as you use it here , and “neo-sorcerers of consumption” in the context of advertising gurus.

  • @ianwenzel5095
    @ianwenzel5095 9 місяців тому

    Beautiful🎉 what a way to summarize a very Interesting text. Everything is an important idea and your voice (cadence, delivering,range) makes it so pleasant to hear.

  • @theory_underground
    @theory_underground 3 роки тому

    Stoked to watch this!

  • @gwinocour
    @gwinocour 3 роки тому +7

    Oh I hope you cover all 40 books of Baudrillard’s. I would eagerly watch each and every one. I’ve read most of them.

    • @lorettagreen6794
      @lorettagreen6794 3 роки тому +3

      That’s an achievement I admire! Any recommendation on selection and order? Just finished ‘for a critique of the political economy of the sign’ and decided I was going to make 2021 the year of Baudrillard. I can’t help but think he understood something no one else did because based on what I glean from secondary sources his theories explain some of the more absurd aspects of contemporary culture. Just not sure whether I should go back and read system of objects or if I was to move forward what I should read next. I would like to understand how his thought developed and his foundational ideas.

    • @hellucination9905
      @hellucination9905 2 роки тому +1

      What five books would you recommend for starting with Baudrillard? Preferably books which are the most relevant regarding today's cultural and societal conditions.

    • @deathrides4756
      @deathrides4756 11 місяців тому +2

      @@hellucination9905 the system of objects, the consumer society, america (second or third), fatal strategies, simulation and simulacra

    • @NafsikaLiz
      @NafsikaLiz 2 місяці тому

      @@deathrides4756 and the transparency of evil

  • @MattStranberg
    @MattStranberg 3 роки тому

    Awesome work as always!

  • @N33TF33T
    @N33TF33T 3 роки тому +2

    Amazing video as always.

  • @Vak_g
    @Vak_g Рік тому +1

    Excellent video about a great book! Thank you so much!

  • @michelleford4002
    @michelleford4002 3 роки тому +15

    Great, thought provoking video Ian. Naturally I found this one particularly interesting.

    • @papichulo4171
      @papichulo4171 3 роки тому +5

      Mfer really commented this a whole day before the video even came out

    • @epochphilosophy
      @epochphilosophy  3 роки тому +6

      @@papichulo4171 Patreon/UA-cam Member early access my friend.

    • @papichulo4171
      @papichulo4171 3 роки тому +4

      @@epochphilosophy Oh, ok makes sense.

    • @punjab1ify
      @punjab1ify 3 роки тому +3

      @@papichulo4171 lol

    • @grekerbeer948
      @grekerbeer948 3 роки тому

      @@epochphilosophy how capitalistic :D

  • @edubmf
    @edubmf 3 роки тому +1

    Very interesting, yet again. Many thanks.

  • @iamcleverdic
    @iamcleverdic 2 роки тому

    Thank you for your effort on our behalf.

  • @darillus1
    @darillus1 10 місяців тому

    love your videos, really well made

  • @eebsvaldizon14
    @eebsvaldizon14 3 роки тому +5

    First of all I want to say that all of your videos are well articulated. I love your work and what you do. But this video was one of your best because I love his philosophy. I absolutely appreciate this video haha. I was also wondering when you were going to do a video about this philosopher. And like I said please keep doing more philosophy videos about postmodernism. Thank you very much. ❤️😁

    • @epochphilosophy
      @epochphilosophy  3 роки тому

      Thanks so much. This is just the beginning of Baudrillard in this channel!

  • @anonymoushuman8344
    @anonymoushuman8344 Рік тому +3

    There should be a wax figure of Baudrillard amongst the other celebrity simulacra at Madame Tussauds wax museum. People would take "selfies" with it. This would become a "thing."

  • @dancerTiki
    @dancerTiki 3 роки тому +1

    What a great video, thank you!

  • @jcrass2361
    @jcrass2361 3 роки тому

    So good. I need to read Baudrillard now.

  • @anonymoushuman8344
    @anonymoushuman8344 Рік тому +4

    I've owned a copy of The System of Objects for many years, as the structuralism/postructuralism section of my philosophy collection would be incomplete without it.

    • @Callamatteomatisch
      @Callamatteomatisch 10 місяців тому +3

      is that irony?

    • @simonthompson27
      @simonthompson27 7 місяців тому +2

      ⁠@@Callamatteomatisch “Today our comments section would feel incomplete without being haunted by irony. Similarly this self-reflexive comment is also needed for the pantomime of commentary” Bon Jovrillard.

    • @deleuzepilled
      @deleuzepilled 6 днів тому +1

      funny

    • @anonymoushuman8344
      @anonymoushuman8344 6 днів тому +1

      It's irony, but it's also true. However, I also have the book because its content is interesting to me.

    • @anonymoushuman8344
      @anonymoushuman8344 6 днів тому +1

      There ought to be life-size wax figures of Baudrillard in the collections of the major wax museums.

  • @BRUNOMISAD
    @BRUNOMISAD 3 роки тому

    Great video man!

  • @JuanPerez-od4pq
    @JuanPerez-od4pq 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much i hope you make more videos like this.
    👌💯💯💯

  • @gonthedriver
    @gonthedriver 6 місяців тому +1

    Great summary. The script works as a thriller

  • @maggiemenghanchen8810
    @maggiemenghanchen8810 Рік тому +1

    would love one video on symbolic exchange and death!! enjoyed this one a lot thank you

  • @racheldenis6205
    @racheldenis6205 2 роки тому +2

    This was incredible

  • @Green-pq2jk
    @Green-pq2jk 3 роки тому +4

    A man gotta love Baudrillard

  • @hellucination9905
    @hellucination9905 2 роки тому

    Excellent video like the rest of your videos!

  • @rafeeqwarfield9690
    @rafeeqwarfield9690 Рік тому +2

    Happy I found your channel man. Learning a lot and in process of also seeing where I stand on things. Keep up the good work, happy to support the cause

  • @gunnarinn90
    @gunnarinn90 3 роки тому

    So good!

  • @georgidetelinov4357
    @georgidetelinov4357 2 роки тому

    Awesome. Thank you

  • @michaelcallaghan8358
    @michaelcallaghan8358 Рік тому

    Excellent video

  • @joaoandre6129
    @joaoandre6129 3 роки тому +12

    Beautifully made, as always. Would love to see a video on Hegel, someday.

    • @epochphilosophy
      @epochphilosophy  3 роки тому +22

      Truly depends on some stuff, but I would love to see one just as much as you. I'll will it into existence soon enough. But, if we do one on one of Hegel's work, it's going to be longggggg and I won't skimp on detail. It'll be the best damn Hegel vid on this site.
      Because of those standards and the sheer pain it would put me through, Imma have to will myself to do it lol

    • @d.r.parsons
      @d.r.parsons 3 роки тому +6

      @@epochphilosophy We demand a 48-hour-long video where you analyze the entirety of the Phenomenology of Spirit, section by section.

    • @VictorLopez-qm5kz
      @VictorLopez-qm5kz 3 роки тому +1

      @@d.r.parsons se don't want homie to die lmao

    • @socialswine3656
      @socialswine3656 2 роки тому

      @@d.r.parsons Sadler 2

  • @mihordeadana2368
    @mihordeadana2368 Рік тому

    Love this channel

  • @emilmaze
    @emilmaze 3 роки тому +3

    where'd you find that picture of Baudrillard in the thumbnail. I've never seen that before

  • @rafeeqwarfield9690
    @rafeeqwarfield9690 Рік тому

    Thanks!

  • @Cooliofamily
    @Cooliofamily 6 місяців тому

    I need more content !!

  • @eternalkino34
    @eternalkino34 3 роки тому

    thank you

  • @lucifervibes
    @lucifervibes 3 роки тому

    beautiful!

  • @reubennb2859
    @reubennb2859 2 роки тому

    These videos are art

  • @Arashinx
    @Arashinx 3 роки тому +5

    Bought this book some months ago and, to be honest, still haven't managed to understand even the first chapter. First philosophy/sociology book I've ever decided to read. I now feel as confused about it as I feel interested in it hahaha. Your video really gave me support so I can go on with my reading, thanks!

    • @hellucination9905
      @hellucination9905 2 роки тому +1

      Don't give up, I felt the same ten years ago starting Adorno's "Dialectic of Enlightenment", my first philosophy book. It will get better, you will understand more and more of these texts, just try to read them as good as you can and the rest will follow!

    • @kirasussane1556
      @kirasussane1556 2 роки тому +1

      The best thing to do is to bought books that are an introduction to social philosophy and political philosophy.
      That way you can situate the author within certain schools of thought and start to understand how they approach certain concepts .
      Sometimes companions to philosophy books also help.

    • @deathrides4756
      @deathrides4756 11 місяців тому

      Keep reading. With luck, the ending of parts will give context to the beginning or the areas in which you don't fully understand. And after you can contemplate the whole.

    • @MargaritaMagdalena
      @MargaritaMagdalena 3 місяці тому

      I recommend the book "The Lonely Crowd" by David Riesman.

  • @zameking
    @zameking 3 роки тому

    awesome!!

  • @abczyx159
    @abczyx159 3 роки тому

    great video

  • @JS-dt1tn
    @JS-dt1tn 3 роки тому

    Bravo!

  • @sethjohnson4409
    @sethjohnson4409 3 роки тому +3

    No wonder Americans had the worst time locking down.. awesome work on this one!

  • @satwikanmol
    @satwikanmol 2 роки тому +1

    Please add simulica and simulation. Very good video.

  • @megaalan12
    @megaalan12 3 роки тому +3

    You're talkin to Vaush right now and I saw you have a video Baudy boi! Gonna check this out later. He's so confusing, so I want to understand him better.

    • @epochphilosophy
      @epochphilosophy  3 роки тому +3

      Very happy to see you here. Yeah dude Baudrillard is so dense. Hopefully I can make his first book here easy to understand.
      The System of Objects is his beginning!

  • @darkmatter345
    @darkmatter345 Рік тому +1

    Baudrillard and Heidegger are very useful reads for designers

  • @prabalrai9801
    @prabalrai9801 7 місяців тому

    I'm high rn, that bg making it more powerful and it's so immersive XD.

  • @Daniel-nb2sb
    @Daniel-nb2sb 3 дні тому

    Does anyone happen to know what is the song playing in the background?

  • @ashdkajbusvwjsizh5187
    @ashdkajbusvwjsizh5187 3 роки тому +4

    Can we change German Ideology with Baudrillard :Dd Anyway thanks epoch missing your streams lately see you on next one.

  • @marcopivetta7796
    @marcopivetta7796 3 місяці тому

    Oh yeah I glee when I find someone talking about Baudrillard that isn't misinterpreting the simulation theory. This is a much more well presented pan over Baudrillard central thesis overall

  • @vinzent998
    @vinzent998 3 роки тому

    Nice.

  • @pdd3798
    @pdd3798 11 місяців тому

    And would this be a critique on man, or simply an acknowledgement of its ability to establish meaning in whatever epoch he exists? I am interested in reading more to see what preferable outcomes of this new humanism.

  • @MargaritaMagdalena
    @MargaritaMagdalena 7 місяців тому +1

    I tried reading the book and broke my brain.

  • @nicholaswright3081
    @nicholaswright3081 2 роки тому

    What do you mean by "dense" when you refer to his book?

  • @brandonmatson7618
    @brandonmatson7618 7 місяців тому +1

    I feel like the ideas in this book are behind this barrier of complexity that could be simplified well enough for more average peopl engage with it's ideas. The way it's written doesn't fit the actual difficulty of the concepts.

  • @lunar-ix9vu
    @lunar-ix9vu 7 місяців тому

    Why is thoughtful writing being read and talked about without a breath?

  • @williamswilliams5617
    @williamswilliams5617 Рік тому

    Is it not complete?

  • @smooa1889
    @smooa1889 3 роки тому +3

    Another masterpiece video loved it ᵇᵘᵗ ᶦ ᶜᵒᵘˡᵈ ʰᵉᵃʳ ᵃ ᵍᵘᵐ ˢᵐᵃᶜᵏʸ ᵐᵒᵘᵗʰ ᶜˡᶦᶜᵏ ˢᵒᵘⁿᵈ ᵃˡˢᵒ ˢᶜʰᵉᵐᵉ ᶦˢ ᵖʳᵒⁿᵒᵘⁿᶜᵉᵈ ˢᵏᵉᵉᵐ

    • @epochphilosophy
      @epochphilosophy  3 роки тому +1

      Haha, thanks. This is a brand new mic and I use an auto-adjusting denoiser on Audition with older settings and it looks like it missed those smaller noises in the beginning. Missed it in editing some how, but I hear it too.
      Luckily it goes away quickly lol.

  • @stuarthicks2696
    @stuarthicks2696 2 роки тому

    That was great. Never a big fan of the Simulacrum thing or the movie the Matrix or Boud’s dismissal of it. They all bore me. This, however, was engaging.

  • @louisonduchatteau1513
    @louisonduchatteau1513 3 роки тому +11

    another comment for the algorithm.

  • @badmojjo
    @badmojjo 3 роки тому +2

    Funny, this video is interrupted by ads. In my case coffee machines 😂

    • @theamici
      @theamici 3 роки тому

      AdBlocker ftw!

  • @ramiismael7502
    @ramiismael7502 3 роки тому +1

    Is there any relationship between UA-camr authenticity ?

  • @crazyape968
    @crazyape968 2 роки тому

    9:00 😁

  • @Nina-wf9gt
    @Nina-wf9gt 3 роки тому +5

    I like your video, but I cant shake off the impression that System of Objects is just a more superficial version of Society of the Spectacle

    • @jacobloving6765
      @jacobloving6765 2 роки тому

      I it’s just an iteration of the same thoughts. I’m pretty sure there’s a paragraph in society of the spectacle about how we just repeat same things over and over again just through a different voice or something like that.

  • @smooa1889
    @smooa1889 3 роки тому +4

    comment for the algorithm

  • @samuelboucher1454
    @samuelboucher1454 3 роки тому

    Baudrillard ASMR

  • @dazpatreg
    @dazpatreg Рік тому

    I do a shot for every excape in each video.

  • @MargaritaMagdalena
    @MargaritaMagdalena 10 місяців тому

    Who is the man in the thumbnail?

  • @TheCbot88
    @TheCbot88 9 днів тому

    For the record; the serpent crawls on it's belly because there it can hide from your gaze. 👀

  • @ridetube66
    @ridetube66 Рік тому

    "ek-scape" do you mean es-cape?

  • @gardnjw
    @gardnjw 2 місяці тому

    Loved the presentation but not that monotonous soundtrack...

  • @murrik
    @murrik 3 місяці тому

    Control our environment and atmosphere, having everything, non scarcity control. Symbols,

  • @dmr11235
    @dmr11235 5 місяців тому

    Dude this is so fucking weird, like 4 of the random greyed out background videos are of the fairly small neighborhood I live in

  • @audrey2433
    @audrey2433 3 роки тому +1

    the only cool French philosopher (who was alive at the time) that didn't sign the petition

    • @befuddledb
      @befuddledb 3 роки тому

      What petition?

    • @audrey2433
      @audrey2433 3 роки тому +2

      ​@@befuddledb a petition against age of consent laws in france pretty much all the big names in french philosophy at the time signed it including Foucault, Derrida and Deleuze etc but not Baudrillard

    • @befuddledb
      @befuddledb 3 роки тому +1

      @@audrey2433 Oh, I heard about it. Thanks!! The "cool" is for him not signing?

  • @sr-kt9ml
    @sr-kt9ml Рік тому

    Did you argue for why credit was essential for this to happen? Seems as though it could have happened without credit

  • @smugli3012
    @smugli3012 3 роки тому +2

    kinda sounds like ted kaczynski 😳

  • @jamesgraham4242
    @jamesgraham4242 3 роки тому +1

    I fish...on the outside. I'm mostly at home on a river. I catch the fish, they don't catch me. I do not live on a lawless planet. I work. I am not a princess.

  • @christopherross8358
    @christopherross8358 3 роки тому +5

    OMG! I'm throwing away my Che T-shirt and only wearing plain grey with no markings.

    • @theamici
      @theamici 3 роки тому +5

      Sounds very functionalist to me. Are you sure you're not committing to consuming the sign of the plain now? :P

    • @shanesargeson532
      @shanesargeson532 2 роки тому +1

      I gave up on Che when I found K Mart selling t-shirts with his image on them. Right next to the Ramones. All their power is gone. Rebellion used against the ones who need it absorbed into the system.

    • @christopherross8358
      @christopherross8358 2 роки тому

      @@theamici Camouflage

    • @christopherross8358
      @christopherross8358 2 роки тому +1

      @@shanesargeson532 You know, you bring up an interesting point. On one hand, Che being popularized brought more awareness to his history for like 1% of those who read books on there own - however the popularization also diluted the influence with every product made.

  • @mattvl73
    @mattvl73 Рік тому +1

    "signifying transcendence". that phrase gives me goosebumps but i can't put my finger on why. "something that was once only associated only with kings and feudal lords" is now available to every yuppie karen whether male or female. thus the "walking pole". i am a relatively uneducated prole peasant. could you help me out? is baudrillard suggesting that this system or tendency is healthy and normal or is he talking about pathology? Is the system of objects a natural and beneficial evolution of mankind or is he saying something has gone horribly wrong?

    • @mihordeadana2368
      @mihordeadana2368 Рік тому

      i think he s implying the latter. that s just what i ve gathered from the video, i haven t read the book just yet

  • @karachaffee3343
    @karachaffee3343 11 місяців тому

    The collapse of credit will be a shock to the system. I have been buying $2500 to $4000 used cars with 100,000 miles on them for decades--and run them until they have over 200,000 miles. I don't have $40,000 for a new car and do not intend to buy on credit, ever.

  • @jordanaugust4329
    @jordanaugust4329 Рік тому

    Semiotics, and much of Baudrillard’s work, is more so built from de Sasseur and structural linguistics.

  • @Dreddwinner
    @Dreddwinner Рік тому

    😎

  • @NoPrivateProperty
    @NoPrivateProperty Рік тому +2

    all philosophy boils down to three simple words.......Eat The Rich

  • @m4chfive
    @m4chfive 3 роки тому +1

    great video, makes me want to walk into the fucking woods. this goddamn frenchman is far far under my skin

  • @_XY_
    @_XY_ 2 роки тому

    The matrix has you

  • @elies8084
    @elies8084 2 роки тому

    of course i get nintendo ads

  • @vevenaneathna
    @vevenaneathna Рік тому

    lol people obsessing over 3d printers for no reason. this hit

  • @lunar.n.6133
    @lunar.n.6133 Рік тому

    The productive process of commodities is awful, and the downside - and it’s being resolved by deep-pocket capital itself in the form of automatons / robots / machines. Modern man: “NOOO now how will I buy iCommodity! Destroy the machines! Give us back our jobs!!” Company: “OK” Modern Man: “NOOOO!!!! Work is alienating!!!”

  • @AI-Hallucination
    @AI-Hallucination Рік тому

    Good video but a fridge is a easy way of describing it in a social context

  • @ericulric223
    @ericulric223 Рік тому +2

    Yeah, no. Videos like this remind me to go read the book myself. Everyone wants condensed quick summaries to save themselves the trouble of thinking it out.

  • @dizmix
    @dizmix 3 місяці тому

    Angry... 🙄