Jean Baudrillard: The System of Objects

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 190

  • @epochphilosophy
    @epochphilosophy  3 роки тому +35

    Hey, friends! Just wanted to stop by and say that none of this would be possible without Patreon and the UA-cam Member section. These videos take a ton of time and effort to make, and UA-cam pays very little. Thus, Patreon is a huge necessity for our survival. If you can spare a few bucks a month, you'd guarantee more videos for the future! Plus, depending on the tiers, you get early access, exclusive content, etc. Anything you can do helps immensely! Appreciate all of you.
    Patreon: www.patreon.com/epochphilosophy
    Membership: ua-cam.com/channels/738SsV6BSLUVvMgKnEFFzQ.htmljoin

    • @Assasinsweed
      @Assasinsweed 3 роки тому +3

      So much great content on this channel and I would like it to continue. So I'll pledge on patreon. Keep up the good work mate.

    • @epochphilosophy
      @epochphilosophy  3 роки тому +3

      @@Assasinsweed Thanks so much. Genuinely means a ton!

    • @N05Y573M
      @N05Y573M 3 роки тому +1

      This is great material 👏👏
      It's amazing how it almost describes what a phylosophy of NFT's could sounds like. The dialectic of NFT's.🗝️

  • @emmanuelalozie5812
    @emmanuelalozie5812 3 роки тому +41

    I’m definitely adding The System of Objects to my reading list. Moving from market himanism
    To self-realization is something I have definitely noticed as of late with the rise of social media.

    • @anonymoushuman8344
      @anonymoushuman8344 Рік тому +9

      😎 You've in fact added The System of Objects to your reading list, but you're also aware of this as an example of serial motivation, correct? Ha!

  • @caymuscairns6845
    @caymuscairns6845 3 роки тому +31

    This channel makes me question everything, this video makes me want to start a commune.

  • @samarthkhandelwal3703
    @samarthkhandelwal3703 3 роки тому +105

    Ironic that I got 3 ads during this video

    • @wildernessisland2573
      @wildernessisland2573 3 роки тому +9

      Were they all a part of the same series of commodified objects?

    • @moch.farisdzulfiqar6123
      @moch.farisdzulfiqar6123 3 роки тому +4

      UA-cam algorithm give you a case study

    • @ageofbumfires5216
      @ageofbumfires5216 Рік тому +2

      From Wells Fargo no less lol

    • @CapnSnackbeard
      @CapnSnackbeard Рік тому +8

      There are 3 kinds of UA-cam viewers in this world: people who pay for UA-cam Premium, those who use an ad blocker, and those who watch ads.

    • @DHU11
      @DHU11 Місяць тому

      @@CapnSnackbeardI can’t use adblock on my phone app though…can I?

  • @anonymoushuman8344
    @anonymoushuman8344 Рік тому +6

    I've owned a copy of The System of Objects for many years, as the structuralism/postructuralism section of my philosophy collection would be incomplete without it.

    • @Callamatteomatisch
      @Callamatteomatisch Рік тому +3

      is that irony?

    • @simonthompson27
      @simonthompson27 Рік тому +2

      ⁠@@Callamatteomatisch “Today our comments section would feel incomplete without being haunted by irony. Similarly this self-reflexive comment is also needed for the pantomime of commentary” Bon Jovrillard.

    • @deleuzepilled
      @deleuzepilled 7 місяців тому +1

      funny

    • @anonymoushuman8344
      @anonymoushuman8344 7 місяців тому +1

      It's irony, but it's also true. However, I also have the book because its content is interesting to me.

    • @anonymoushuman8344
      @anonymoushuman8344 7 місяців тому +1

      There ought to be life-size wax figures of Baudrillard in the collections of the major wax museums.

  • @symsoup
    @symsoup 4 місяці тому +1

    Amazing explanation! Thank you!

  • @Knaeben
    @Knaeben 3 роки тому +20

    Your content is outstanding. Every video is well-presented and non-condescending. I always finish either feeling like I have learned something, or at least sparked ideas.

  • @beaubolieu
    @beaubolieu Рік тому +5

    This is a great video! Thank you. I couldn’t find this phrase “sorcerer(s) of atmosphere” 5:03 in the text, but it’s a great phrase and I wish he had! He does mention “engineer of atmosphere” in a context as you use it here , and “neo-sorcerers of consumption” in the context of advertising gurus.

  • @canderousordo8271
    @canderousordo8271 3 роки тому +20

    Maybe your best video yet. Baudrillard is sometimes hard to read and always hard to understand, yet you present it in a very understandable manner.

    • @OutragedPufferfish
      @OutragedPufferfish Рік тому +3

      He's always hard to read and hard to understand.

    • @CC3GROUNDZERO
      @CC3GROUNDZERO 11 місяців тому +1

      @@OutragedPufferfish Compared to what? Heidegger?

    • @OutragedPufferfish
      @OutragedPufferfish 11 місяців тому +1

      @@CC3GROUNDZERO Compared to most texts.

  • @cobbanon5778
    @cobbanon5778 3 роки тому +40

    This is terrific. I would love to see your perspective on Fredric Jameson, otherwise keep up the good work!

  • @LogicGated
    @LogicGated 2 роки тому +2

    Man the music really adds to the video experience, great work!

  • @gonthedriver
    @gonthedriver Рік тому +1

    Great summary. The script works as a thriller

  • @Vak_g
    @Vak_g Рік тому +2

    Excellent video about a great book! Thank you so much!

  • @gwinocour
    @gwinocour 3 роки тому +8

    Oh I hope you cover all 40 books of Baudrillard’s. I would eagerly watch each and every one. I’ve read most of them.

    • @lorettagreen6794
      @lorettagreen6794 3 роки тому +4

      That’s an achievement I admire! Any recommendation on selection and order? Just finished ‘for a critique of the political economy of the sign’ and decided I was going to make 2021 the year of Baudrillard. I can’t help but think he understood something no one else did because based on what I glean from secondary sources his theories explain some of the more absurd aspects of contemporary culture. Just not sure whether I should go back and read system of objects or if I was to move forward what I should read next. I would like to understand how his thought developed and his foundational ideas.

    • @hellucination9905
      @hellucination9905 3 роки тому +1

      What five books would you recommend for starting with Baudrillard? Preferably books which are the most relevant regarding today's cultural and societal conditions.

    • @deathrides4756
      @deathrides4756 Рік тому +2

      @@hellucination9905 the system of objects, the consumer society, america (second or third), fatal strategies, simulation and simulacra

    • @NafsikaLiz
      @NafsikaLiz 9 місяців тому

      @@deathrides4756 and the transparency of evil

  • @scowlistic
    @scowlistic 2 роки тому +1

    Not for the faint of heart, at least not the full video in one sitting. Excellent work man, thank you.

  • @ianwenzel5095
    @ianwenzel5095 Рік тому +1

    Beautiful🎉 what a way to summarize a very Interesting text. Everything is an important idea and your voice (cadence, delivering,range) makes it so pleasant to hear.

  • @0x400Bogdan
    @0x400Bogdan 3 роки тому +1

    I like that your videos are fast-paced. I don’t need to increase the speed in UA-cam. Thank you for keeping this in mind.

  • @anonymoushuman8344
    @anonymoushuman8344 Рік тому +4

    There should be a wax figure of Baudrillard amongst the other celebrity simulacra at Madame Tussauds wax museum. People would take "selfies" with it. This would become a "thing."

  • @iamcleverdic
    @iamcleverdic 2 роки тому

    Thank you for your effort on our behalf.

  • @Yellow.1844
    @Yellow.1844 3 роки тому +4

    A man gotta love Baudrillard

  • @michelleford4002
    @michelleford4002 3 роки тому +15

    Great, thought provoking video Ian. Naturally I found this one particularly interesting.

    • @papichulo4171
      @papichulo4171 3 роки тому +5

      Mfer really commented this a whole day before the video even came out

    • @epochphilosophy
      @epochphilosophy  3 роки тому +6

      @@papichulo4171 Patreon/UA-cam Member early access my friend.

    • @papichulo4171
      @papichulo4171 3 роки тому +5

      @@epochphilosophy Oh, ok makes sense.

    • @punjab1ify
      @punjab1ify 3 роки тому +4

      @@papichulo4171 lol

    • @grekerbeer948
      @grekerbeer948 3 роки тому +1

      @@epochphilosophy how capitalistic :D

  • @theory_underground
    @theory_underground 3 роки тому +1

    Stoked to watch this!

  • @user-yk9sk7pg6v
    @user-yk9sk7pg6v 4 місяці тому

    Thank you!

  • @darkmatter345
    @darkmatter345 Рік тому +1

    Baudrillard and Heidegger are very useful reads for designers

  • @rafeeqwarfield9690
    @rafeeqwarfield9690 2 роки тому +2

    Happy I found your channel man. Learning a lot and in process of also seeing where I stand on things. Keep up the good work, happy to support the cause

  • @maggiemenghanchen8810
    @maggiemenghanchen8810 2 роки тому +1

    would love one video on symbolic exchange and death!! enjoyed this one a lot thank you

  • @sjorskattenbelt4384
    @sjorskattenbelt4384 3 роки тому +2

    Watched the intro, this is going to be good. You give a good summary of what is about to come, accompanied by a nice voice recorded with a decent mic. This is going to be a great help for my essay. Especially since you use citations and interpreted them afterwards.

  • @eebsvaldizon14
    @eebsvaldizon14 3 роки тому +5

    First of all I want to say that all of your videos are well articulated. I love your work and what you do. But this video was one of your best because I love his philosophy. I absolutely appreciate this video haha. I was also wondering when you were going to do a video about this philosopher. And like I said please keep doing more philosophy videos about postmodernism. Thank you very much. ❤️😁

    • @epochphilosophy
      @epochphilosophy  3 роки тому

      Thanks so much. This is just the beginning of Baudrillard in this channel!

  • @satwikanmol
    @satwikanmol 3 роки тому +3

    Please add simulica and simulation. Very good video.

  • @Arashinx
    @Arashinx 3 роки тому +5

    Bought this book some months ago and, to be honest, still haven't managed to understand even the first chapter. First philosophy/sociology book I've ever decided to read. I now feel as confused about it as I feel interested in it hahaha. Your video really gave me support so I can go on with my reading, thanks!

    • @hellucination9905
      @hellucination9905 3 роки тому +1

      Don't give up, I felt the same ten years ago starting Adorno's "Dialectic of Enlightenment", my first philosophy book. It will get better, you will understand more and more of these texts, just try to read them as good as you can and the rest will follow!

    • @kirasussane1556
      @kirasussane1556 3 роки тому +1

      The best thing to do is to bought books that are an introduction to social philosophy and political philosophy.
      That way you can situate the author within certain schools of thought and start to understand how they approach certain concepts .
      Sometimes companions to philosophy books also help.

    • @deathrides4756
      @deathrides4756 Рік тому

      Keep reading. With luck, the ending of parts will give context to the beginning or the areas in which you don't fully understand. And after you can contemplate the whole.

    • @OutragedPufferfish
      @OutragedPufferfish 10 місяців тому

      I recommend the book "The Lonely Crowd" by David Riesman.

  • @edubmf
    @edubmf 3 роки тому +1

    Very interesting, yet again. Many thanks.

  • @Rubydeniss
    @Rubydeniss 3 роки тому +2

    This was incredible

  • @joaoandre6129
    @joaoandre6129 3 роки тому +12

    Beautifully made, as always. Would love to see a video on Hegel, someday.

    • @epochphilosophy
      @epochphilosophy  3 роки тому +22

      Truly depends on some stuff, but I would love to see one just as much as you. I'll will it into existence soon enough. But, if we do one on one of Hegel's work, it's going to be longggggg and I won't skimp on detail. It'll be the best damn Hegel vid on this site.
      Because of those standards and the sheer pain it would put me through, Imma have to will myself to do it lol

    • @d.r.parsons
      @d.r.parsons 3 роки тому +6

      @@epochphilosophy We demand a 48-hour-long video where you analyze the entirety of the Phenomenology of Spirit, section by section.

    • @VictorLopez-qm5kz
      @VictorLopez-qm5kz 3 роки тому +1

      @@d.r.parsons se don't want homie to die lmao

    • @socialswine3656
      @socialswine3656 2 роки тому

      @@d.r.parsons Sadler 2

  • @sethjohnson4409
    @sethjohnson4409 3 роки тому +4

    No wonder Americans had the worst time locking down.. awesome work on this one!

  • @emilmaze
    @emilmaze 3 роки тому +3

    where'd you find that picture of Baudrillard in the thumbnail. I've never seen that before

  • @marcopivetta7796
    @marcopivetta7796 10 місяців тому

    Oh yeah I glee when I find someone talking about Baudrillard that isn't misinterpreting the simulation theory. This is a much more well presented pan over Baudrillard central thesis overall

  • @JuanPerez-od4pq
    @JuanPerez-od4pq 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much i hope you make more videos like this.
    👌💯💯💯

  • @dancerTiki
    @dancerTiki 3 роки тому +1

    What a great video, thank you!

  • @N33TF33T
    @N33TF33T 3 роки тому +2

    Amazing video as always.

  • @jkam2524
    @jkam2524 2 роки тому

    That was A LOT. Thanks for this.

  • @jcrass2361
    @jcrass2361 3 роки тому

    So good. I need to read Baudrillard now.

  • @varnaksingh
    @varnaksingh 2 місяці тому

    Good going mate

  • @mihordeadana2368
    @mihordeadana2368 Рік тому

    Love this channel

  • @michaelcallaghan8358
    @michaelcallaghan8358 2 роки тому

    Excellent video

  • @rafeeqwarfield9690
    @rafeeqwarfield9690 2 роки тому

    Thanks!

  • @Cooliofamily
    @Cooliofamily Рік тому

    I need more content !!

  • @prabalrai9801
    @prabalrai9801 Рік тому

    I'm high rn, that bg making it more powerful and it's so immersive XD.

  • @3798-d6u
    @3798-d6u Рік тому

    And would this be a critique on man, or simply an acknowledgement of its ability to establish meaning in whatever epoch he exists? I am interested in reading more to see what preferable outcomes of this new humanism.

  • @MattStranberg
    @MattStranberg 3 роки тому

    Awesome work as always!

  • @eternalkino34
    @eternalkino34 3 роки тому

    thank you

  • @georgidetelinov4357
    @georgidetelinov4357 3 роки тому

    Awesome. Thank you

  • @louisonduchatteau1513
    @louisonduchatteau1513 3 роки тому +12

    another comment for the algorithm.

  • @BRUNOMISAD
    @BRUNOMISAD 3 роки тому

    Great video man!

  • @OutragedPufferfish
    @OutragedPufferfish Рік тому +1

    I tried reading the book and broke my brain.

  • @gunnarinn90
    @gunnarinn90 3 роки тому

    So good!

  • @reubennb2859
    @reubennb2859 3 роки тому

    These videos are art

  • @nicholaswright3081
    @nicholaswright3081 2 роки тому

    What do you mean by "dense" when you refer to his book?

  • @hellucination9905
    @hellucination9905 3 роки тому

    Excellent video like the rest of your videos!

  • @williamswilliams5617
    @williamswilliams5617 Рік тому

    Is it not complete?

  • @MattWalters123
    @MattWalters123 5 місяців тому

    Now I want to read this book to see if I can make it about Jung and Weber instead

  • @lunar-ix9vu
    @lunar-ix9vu Рік тому

    Why is thoughtful writing being read and talked about without a breath?

  • @zameking
    @zameking 3 роки тому

    awesome!!

  • @JS-dt1tn
    @JS-dt1tn 3 роки тому

    Bravo!

  • @ramiismael7502
    @ramiismael7502 3 роки тому +1

    Is there any relationship between UA-camr authenticity ?

  • @abczyx159
    @abczyx159 3 роки тому

    great video

  • @christopherross8358
    @christopherross8358 3 роки тому +5

    OMG! I'm throwing away my Che T-shirt and only wearing plain grey with no markings.

    • @theamici
      @theamici 3 роки тому +5

      Sounds very functionalist to me. Are you sure you're not committing to consuming the sign of the plain now? :P

    • @shanesargeson532
      @shanesargeson532 3 роки тому +1

      I gave up on Che when I found K Mart selling t-shirts with his image on them. Right next to the Ramones. All their power is gone. Rebellion used against the ones who need it absorbed into the system.

    • @christopherross8358
      @christopherross8358 3 роки тому

      @@theamici Camouflage

    • @christopherross8358
      @christopherross8358 3 роки тому +1

      @@shanesargeson532 You know, you bring up an interesting point. On one hand, Che being popularized brought more awareness to his history for like 1% of those who read books on there own - however the popularization also diluted the influence with every product made.

  • @smooa1889
    @smooa1889 3 роки тому +4

    comment for the algorithm

  • @megaalan12
    @megaalan12 3 роки тому +3

    You're talkin to Vaush right now and I saw you have a video Baudy boi! Gonna check this out later. He's so confusing, so I want to understand him better.

    • @epochphilosophy
      @epochphilosophy  3 роки тому +3

      Very happy to see you here. Yeah dude Baudrillard is so dense. Hopefully I can make his first book here easy to understand.
      The System of Objects is his beginning!

  • @stuarthicks2696
    @stuarthicks2696 2 роки тому

    That was great. Never a big fan of the Simulacrum thing or the movie the Matrix or Boud’s dismissal of it. They all bore me. This, however, was engaging.

  • @dazpatreg
    @dazpatreg Рік тому

    I do a shot for every excape in each video.

  • @FlorinGN
    @FlorinGN 3 роки тому +2

    Funny, this video is interrupted by ads. In my case coffee machines 😂

    • @theamici
      @theamici 3 роки тому

      AdBlocker ftw!

  • @ashdkajbusvwjsizh5187
    @ashdkajbusvwjsizh5187 3 роки тому +4

    Can we change German Ideology with Baudrillard :Dd Anyway thanks epoch missing your streams lately see you on next one.

  • @Nina-wf9gt
    @Nina-wf9gt 3 роки тому +5

    I like your video, but I cant shake off the impression that System of Objects is just a more superficial version of Society of the Spectacle

    • @jacobloving6765
      @jacobloving6765 3 роки тому

      I it’s just an iteration of the same thoughts. I’m pretty sure there’s a paragraph in society of the spectacle about how we just repeat same things over and over again just through a different voice or something like that.

  • @lucifervibes
    @lucifervibes 3 роки тому

    beautiful!

  • @OutragedPufferfish
    @OutragedPufferfish Рік тому

    Who is the man in the thumbnail?

  • @karachaffee3343
    @karachaffee3343 Рік тому

    The collapse of credit will be a shock to the system. I have been buying $2500 to $4000 used cars with 100,000 miles on them for decades--and run them until they have over 200,000 miles. I don't have $40,000 for a new car and do not intend to buy on credit, ever.

  • @mattvl73
    @mattvl73 2 роки тому +1

    "signifying transcendence". that phrase gives me goosebumps but i can't put my finger on why. "something that was once only associated only with kings and feudal lords" is now available to every yuppie karen whether male or female. thus the "walking pole". i am a relatively uneducated prole peasant. could you help me out? is baudrillard suggesting that this system or tendency is healthy and normal or is he talking about pathology? Is the system of objects a natural and beneficial evolution of mankind or is he saying something has gone horribly wrong?

    • @mihordeadana2368
      @mihordeadana2368 Рік тому

      i think he s implying the latter. that s just what i ve gathered from the video, i haven t read the book just yet

  • @smooa1889
    @smooa1889 3 роки тому +3

    Another masterpiece video loved it ᵇᵘᵗ ᶦ ᶜᵒᵘˡᵈ ʰᵉᵃʳ ᵃ ᵍᵘᵐ ˢᵐᵃᶜᵏʸ ᵐᵒᵘᵗʰ ᶜˡᶦᶜᵏ ˢᵒᵘⁿᵈ ᵃˡˢᵒ ˢᶜʰᵉᵐᵉ ᶦˢ ᵖʳᵒⁿᵒᵘⁿᶜᵉᵈ ˢᵏᵉᵉᵐ

    • @epochphilosophy
      @epochphilosophy  3 роки тому +1

      Haha, thanks. This is a brand new mic and I use an auto-adjusting denoiser on Audition with older settings and it looks like it missed those smaller noises in the beginning. Missed it in editing some how, but I hear it too.
      Luckily it goes away quickly lol.

  • @vinzent998
    @vinzent998 3 роки тому

    Nice.

  • @ridetube66
    @ridetube66 2 роки тому

    "ek-scape" do you mean es-cape?

  • @chasebase76
    @chasebase76 3 дні тому

    Oh *you're* the guy who highlights the entire book lol. #triggered
    Thanks for the video.

  • @jamesgraham4242
    @jamesgraham4242 3 роки тому +1

    I fish...on the outside. I'm mostly at home on a river. I catch the fish, they don't catch me. I do not live on a lawless planet. I work. I am not a princess.

  • @murrik
    @murrik 10 місяців тому

    Control our environment and atmosphere, having everything, non scarcity control. Symbols,

  • @audrey2433
    @audrey2433 3 роки тому +1

    the only cool French philosopher (who was alive at the time) that didn't sign the petition

    • @befuddledb
      @befuddledb 3 роки тому

      What petition?

    • @audrey2433
      @audrey2433 3 роки тому +2

      ​@@befuddledb a petition against age of consent laws in france pretty much all the big names in french philosophy at the time signed it including Foucault, Derrida and Deleuze etc but not Baudrillard

    • @befuddledb
      @befuddledb 3 роки тому +1

      @@audrey2433 Oh, I heard about it. Thanks!! The "cool" is for him not signing?

  • @crazyape968
    @crazyape968 2 роки тому

    9:00 😁

  • @samuelboucher1454
    @samuelboucher1454 3 роки тому

    Baudrillard ASMR

  • @smugli3012
    @smugli3012 3 роки тому +2

    kinda sounds like ted kaczynski 😳

  • @4amwaj
    @4amwaj Місяць тому

    Wow

  • @jordanaugust4329
    @jordanaugust4329 2 роки тому

    Semiotics, and much of Baudrillard’s work, is more so built from de Sasseur and structural linguistics.

  • @gardnjw
    @gardnjw 9 місяців тому

    Loved the presentation but not that monotonous soundtrack...

  • @m4chfive
    @m4chfive 3 роки тому +1

    great video, makes me want to walk into the fucking woods. this goddamn frenchman is far far under my skin

  • @brandonmatson7618
    @brandonmatson7618 Рік тому +1

    I feel like the ideas in this book are behind this barrier of complexity that could be simplified well enough for more average peopl engage with it's ideas. The way it's written doesn't fit the actual difficulty of the concepts.

  • @Zeropadd
    @Zeropadd 2 роки тому

    😎

  • @lorishu48103
    @lorishu48103 Місяць тому

    Word said by human

  • @BobGormer
    @BobGormer 28 днів тому +1

    This might be true for other brands, but Tesla is an exception. I just got the new Cybertruck and it is TRULY elevating humanity. FACT. I am downvoting this video because of this inaccuracy.

  • @vevenaneathna
    @vevenaneathna 2 роки тому

    lol people obsessing over 3d printers for no reason. this hit

  • @elies8084
    @elies8084 3 роки тому

    of course i get nintendo ads

  • @_XY_
    @_XY_ 2 роки тому

    The matrix has you

  • @AI-Hallucination
    @AI-Hallucination Рік тому

    Good video but a fridge is a easy way of describing it in a social context

  • @5driedgrams
    @5driedgrams 11 місяців тому

    You sound like Sam Harris, but smart.