Rupert Sheldrake on learning by doing, cancel culture and the moral vacuum at the heart of education

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 22

  • @cheri238
    @cheri238 5 місяців тому +12

    Thank you both. It is always a wonderful experience listening to Rupbert Sheldrake.
    I grew up as a very young child underneath the stars, by rivers, caves, waterfalls, and planted seeds for gardens, bee hives, on a farm , a child with many animals. Walks in forrest in nature. I am of Cherokee blood.
    I was very fortunate and still am in many ways.

  • @johncochrane2707
    @johncochrane2707 5 місяців тому +14

    Marvellous interview with a wonderful man. God bless Rupert Sheldrake, and thanks to you for this video.

  • @sallyp50
    @sallyp50 27 днів тому

    I Enjoyed this program. I'm a retired educator. Discussed is what is missing from education. Education is also too data driven with little child exploration and joy of learning. I'm encouraged there is a renewed interest in what needs to change to improve educating our children both in school and at home.

  • @sandrapatterson919
    @sandrapatterson919 5 місяців тому +5

    I could listen to Rupert Sheldrake all day. Great interview.

  • @patriciamayborne2858
    @patriciamayborne2858 5 місяців тому +10

    I love this conversation between two calm, intelligent, humane people 🪷

  • @MendeMaria-ej8bf
    @MendeMaria-ej8bf 5 місяців тому +2

    Thank you for interviewing Rupert Sheldrake with his wonderful mind and insights. ❤

  • @Protocallireland
    @Protocallireland 3 місяці тому

    Wonderful discussion. Thank you!

  • @jamesrossiter6319
    @jamesrossiter6319 5 місяців тому +4

    Rupbert Sheldrake is a gift to humanity.

  • @margueritespringer3687
    @margueritespringer3687 5 місяців тому +1

    I appreciated your questions to Rupert. Thank you.

  • @charliebrens3349
    @charliebrens3349 5 місяців тому +1

    I hear and I forget. I see and I remember. I do and I understand.

  • @purplezoid1
    @purplezoid1 4 місяці тому +1

    Another great talk thanks P.S. does anyone know the name of the song at the end?

  • @zebrowski1000
    @zebrowski1000 4 місяці тому +1

    Could a native speaker describe the language/accent Mr Sheldrake speaks, please (it is beautiful)?

  • @johnandrews1162
    @johnandrews1162 5 місяців тому +3

    What does Rupert think about Michael Levin’s work on bioelectrics? Do his theory of morphic resonance and Michael Levin’s work fit together?

    • @cheri238
      @cheri238 5 місяців тому +3

      Ask Dr. Iain McGilchrist who speaks with all of them.❤

    • @Obilio222
      @Obilio222 4 місяці тому +2

      They work in slightly different ways but in a nutshell, yes, they are consistent with each other.

    • @cheri238
      @cheri238 4 місяці тому +2

      @@Obilio222
      🙏❤️🌏🌎🌍🌿🕊🎵🎶🎵💫✨️💫

  • @brendawilliams8062
    @brendawilliams8062 2 місяці тому

    I can’t see an argument against morphic resonance Everywhere is vibration.

  • @rupertbear9116
    @rupertbear9116 Місяць тому

    religion is for gullible folk; philosophy is for the wise.

  • @markrichter2053
    @markrichter2053 5 місяців тому +1

    The disembodied mind is a very gnostic pseudo-virtue.

    • @markrichter2053
      @markrichter2053 5 місяців тому +3

      @@JohnPretty1
      Hi John,
      Ok. I apologise because what I said wasn’t clear. It takes some unpacking:
      Problem with Gnosticism is the duality between the physical and the spiritual. So: material realm bad, spirit good. This leads to all sorts of problems including an unhealthy attitude towards our own bodies and a lack of sense of responsibility for a physical earth that it considers to be inherently evil and temporal.
      So Gnosticism tends to lead to adherents living in the intellect and being too heavenly minded to be of any earthly use. And it thinks this is a virtue.
      However what Rupert Sheldrake is exploring is the intuitive understanding that “primitive” cultures teach us, that the transcendent is in fact accessed through the imminent physical and not in negation of it. This is a much more integrated approach and can lead to a unitive consciousness rather than the fragmented consciousness of duality that sees the physical body at war with the spirit/mind.
      So I summarise in short hand by saying that the disembodied mind is gnostic pseudo-Virtue. That’s the trouble with UA-cam comments. They’re often standing for things we know we mean, but really need unpacking before they make any sense to others. So, thanks for asking.