Freeland Gets EXPOSED During Question Period!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 бер 2024
  • Poilievre doesn't even need to study Liberal arguments at this point.
    ►Click HERE for Tanner's NEW BOOK "Kingdom of Cain": www.amazon.ca/Kingdom-Cain-Es...
    ►Click HERE to to help support Tanner's videos (thank you so much!): donorbox.org/support-us-158
    ► Click HERE to subscribe to Tanner Hnidey on UA-cam: / @officialtannerhnidey
    ► Click HERE to subscribe to Tanner's Website: www.tannerhnidey.com/lead-col...
    Original Video: • Question Period - Marc...
    Note - This video isn't an endorsement of Poilievre or the Conservatives.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 106

  • @lalani888blue
    @lalani888blue 2 місяці тому +20

    Freeland desperately repeating lame talking points - No matter the sea of facts. She's done.

  • @thethrivinghsp4197
    @thethrivinghsp4197 2 місяці тому +20

    So Freeland, what about your monthly expenses on a personal trainer that is coming out of our pockets...... this is a great example of the pot calling the kettle black

    • @chriscommandeur5332
      @chriscommandeur5332 2 місяці тому

      Look into thd governor Generals expense account, that will shock you !

    • @lesblatnyak5947
      @lesblatnyak5947 2 місяці тому

      That's under entitlements

  • @jontipping
    @jontipping 2 місяці тому +9

    I don't know how Trudeau and Freeland are still breathing.

    • @rhystic628
      @rhystic628 2 місяці тому

      Its the tens of thosuands a month that WE spend on their security.

  • @coreydenadmirant2528
    @coreydenadmirant2528 2 місяці тому +30

    This is the lady who is robbing us??? Is this for real? This one and the other clown??

    • @toddman26
      @toddman26 2 місяці тому +2

      Lady???? You are too kind!😂

    • @tmacmac-ec2ut
      @tmacmac-ec2ut 2 місяці тому +2

      YEP BECAUSE OUR FINANCE MINISTER HAS A JOURNALIST DEGREE
      OUR HEALTH MINISTIR HAS A ACCOUNTING DEGREE
      OUR MINISTIR OF ENVIORMENT IS A CRIMINAL AND WAS ARRESTED
      ITS LIKE GOING TO THE MECHANIC BUT HES A CHEF

  • @mariatortorici6214
    @mariatortorici6214 2 місяці тому +19

    So if they’re returning more money why charge it to begin with! They really think we’re stupid!

  • @jaygallant8635
    @jaygallant8635 2 місяці тому +16

    Yeah, question period. Just questions, never any answers. House of Commons is such a giant crock of shjtzz

  • @Bluemoon00924
    @Bluemoon00924 2 місяці тому +7

    Less government is better government.

  • @toddman26
    @toddman26 2 місяці тому +4

    Carbon, technically and scientifically, is not pollution...what a freaking pile of crap.

  • @oldefarte8806
    @oldefarte8806 2 місяці тому +19

    Pierre ---- Trudeau and Freeland and Singh ---- need to go

    • @erepsekahs
      @erepsekahs 2 місяці тому

      Hugely embarrassing to Canada.

  • @erepsekahs
    @erepsekahs 2 місяці тому +4

    In all seriousness: She is not too quick. As for Trudeau: He is certainly not worth the cost, and additionally not worth the international embarrassment. The man is a maroon. and the World knows it. If he were brighter he would have realized it too.

  • @kelex12
    @kelex12 2 місяці тому +6

    The carbon tax is one of the biggest scams of all time. AXE THE TAX!!

  • @kelex12
    @kelex12 2 місяці тому +5

    She says all conservatives do is cut, cut, cut. Well all Liberals do is spend, spend, spend and tax, tax, tax. We need way more cutting of all the tax dollars being spent on nonsense and bloated government salaries and less spending and taxes.

  • @akathardos
    @akathardos 2 місяці тому +5

    If there was no tax, rebates not needed. Doy!

  • @marilynhobson303
    @marilynhobson303 2 місяці тому +3

    She needs to go to jail also.

  • @beckipodgurney7672
    @beckipodgurney7672 2 місяці тому +4

    Where the hell is our prestigious P M anyway ? Snowboard, skiing, sipping whisky signing cheques we can’t afford to pay?!?!

  • @kelex12
    @kelex12 2 місяці тому +2

    Freeland's screechy, whiney voice is so annoying. Like fingernails on a chalkboard.

  • @jeff_mossy
    @jeff_mossy 2 місяці тому +8

    The headaches she must suffer…
    To frown that much has to be painful.

  • @Bluemoon00924
    @Bluemoon00924 2 місяці тому +7

    Freeland needs to go!

  • @FLEXjs
    @FLEXjs 2 місяці тому +3

    "They don't want you to drive" - EXACTLY

  • @foghornleghorn2445
    @foghornleghorn2445 2 місяці тому +6

    Heinous. That's the only word I can think of to describe that gargoyle. I guess I have two words.

  • @maxwellpiercey161
    @maxwellpiercey161 2 місяці тому +6

    Did I hear that right. Did she just call the libraries party a regime .

  • @user-zb1ri9fn3n
    @user-zb1ri9fn3n 2 місяці тому +6

    I now oppose clean energy while Drax slow burns Canadian forests for UK Biomass Energy production.

  • @gracefaithsaved
    @gracefaithsaved 2 місяці тому +13

    Signs of Christ's Return:
    “Because lawlessness is increased, most people’s love will grow cold. But he who stands firm till the end will be saved."
    - Jesus (Matthew 24:12-13)

    • @toddman26
      @toddman26 2 місяці тому +1

      Amen! 💯🎯 truth!

  • @janetrossetti
    @janetrossetti 2 місяці тому +9

    Any and all goods that come to Quebec from Amy other province is being subject to Trudeau’s tax! … then Quebec slaps their own QST fuel and municipal taxes every litre of fuel sold as well.

    • @tammymonette8371
      @tammymonette8371 2 місяці тому +2

      paying already $1.70 a litre

    • @tammymonette8371
      @tammymonette8371 2 місяці тому +2

      How much more can we take before we rise up together

  • @ConstructionKronies
    @ConstructionKronies 2 місяці тому +4

    What's this rebate they talk of? My taxes are always up to date, I know the carbon tax has stripped me of thousands, I'm a small contractor who travels rural alberta building. I've never received a cent back. I know my friend on welfare who doesn't own a car and doesn't buy gas or fuel of any kind gets a check, what about me the working guy?

  • @magdelanepolites5878
    @magdelanepolites5878 2 місяці тому +2

    Doesn't keep a penny? You've been embezzling 2 cents on every transaction since the penny scam was enacted!

    • @brokefangmagepunk3685
      @brokefangmagepunk3685 2 місяці тому

      Right? That always pissed me off. We got rid of pennies, but paying with a card and not cash? You'll get charged extra cents to round up to the nearest nickel.
      It's almost like the Office Space movie penny scam on steroids

  • @beckipodgurney7672
    @beckipodgurney7672 2 місяці тому +2

    She’s a damn parrot!

  • @akashaofthenile6077
    @akashaofthenile6077 2 місяці тому +1

    if PP was serious about axe the tax, he'd remove their support of the Paris accord!

  • @patrickschmidt9795
    @patrickschmidt9795 2 місяці тому

    as a Quebecer born and raised,.please have mercy and cut the carbon tax in our province. we literally can't afford it.

  • @user-qs7gx7rp7m
    @user-qs7gx7rp7m 2 місяці тому +3

    ADVERSITY - By trying we can easily learn to endure adversity -- another persons I mean."
    - 'Mark Twain' ... Following the Equator

  • @barbmckay2557
    @barbmckay2557 2 місяці тому

    Freeland needs to go to jail and freeze her bank account

  • @judythrobertson6433
    @judythrobertson6433 2 місяці тому +2

    Whats with the annoying hammer of her left arm . Does she think it's make her more special. Your our gunned freeland lol

  • @Bluemoon00924
    @Bluemoon00924 2 місяці тому +1

    The Soviet Union paid a guaranteed income, how'd that turn out?

  • @akashaofthenile6077
    @akashaofthenile6077 2 місяці тому

    the taxes began after ww2,,it was suppose to be temporary to rebuild the government coffers from spending from the war...how many wars have they funded since then?

  • @alanmaikawa3500
    @alanmaikawa3500 2 місяці тому

    If the carbon tax is revenue neutral than why have it????

  • @lenkop487
    @lenkop487 2 місяці тому

    SAY NO NOW

  • @kevinmcpherson6999
    @kevinmcpherson6999 2 місяці тому +3

    Hire someone that can read French.

  • @lenkop487
    @lenkop487 2 місяці тому

    SAY FK IT WE ARE DONE

  • @debbielachance443
    @debbielachance443 2 місяці тому

    I cannot stand freeland ....its only a matter of time ....I just wish it would happen sooner than later ....I want them out omg what does it take .....ELECTION!!!!!!

  • @lenkop487
    @lenkop487 2 місяці тому

    EVERYONE STAY AT HOME

  • @dorothymason8882
    @dorothymason8882 2 місяці тому

    It must be nice to earn big bucks, while sitting on a committee., nodding yes, yes, indeed . Plus it’s good exercise for the neck.🔮

  • @davidshepherd2107
    @davidshepherd2107 2 місяці тому

    That girl shouldn't try to make an ugly face, I suppose you never heard, don't make an ugly face or it will stay that way, another child made faces when she was young.

  • @jolanda9947
    @jolanda9947 2 місяці тому

    hmmm lets look into who wants our trees eh whos money

  • @MSJ_raptor
    @MSJ_raptor 2 місяці тому

    I like the fish minister the best. she looks perfect for the job.

  • @toddman26
    @toddman26 2 місяці тому

    If all the rebates and benefits, the Twitch Witch keeps talking about, were so helpful, why are so many people starving and homeless? I prefer listening to the translator as opposed to the Twitch Witch.

  • @polarnights7005
    @polarnights7005 2 місяці тому +1

    At, The H of C Theatre Macabre. Another, Pierre channel??

  • @abrhamguenther5720
    @abrhamguenther5720 2 місяці тому

    Hey hello my friend your video is may be a fake one or some thing because it’s not matching up the mouth of the person speaking goodbye

  • @jameshushard1640
    @jameshushard1640 2 місяці тому +2

    look it's simple carbon rebate is based on gasoline sales and fuel costs so if you do not pay for fuel consumption you get more money back than you pay so if you are fuel purchasing Canadian you are getting penalties for your bad habits so yup rewards people who don't need fuel and if you need you use fuel because you don't live in big cities with mostly fuel based transportation your the loser

  • @kairenjamieson5351
    @kairenjamieson5351 2 місяці тому +5

    This is the video of the month for me--never thought about the rebate being an incentive to use more carbon--excellent point

  • @robertthiesen2687
    @robertthiesen2687 2 місяці тому +1

    Your argument at 10 minutes doesn't make sense. The tax increases the price of fossil fuels, disincentivizing their purchase, and then the rebates give money back but not based on how much fossil fuel you used. So, by using less gas, you pay less tax but you receive the same amount of money you otherwise would. I'm on team Conservative, but I would like to see conservatives not be antagonistic to the point of distortion in their opposition to Liberals.

    • @OfficialTannerHnidey
      @OfficialTannerHnidey  2 місяці тому +3

      Ah, you're right - I should've been clearer about what I was trying to say. Let me clarify: We pay a set amount of carbon tax per litre of gasoline ($.17/litre on April 1st), GJ of natural gas, kg of coal, etc.
      Now, carbon rebates are set per province. Every married couple, or single adult, gets back the same rebate. The carbon tax we pay, however, is variable. If you purchase more O&G (larger home, more driving, etc), you pay more in carbon tax. If you purchase less O&G, you pay less carbon tax.
      Thus, the more carbon you consume, the more tax you pay, which cancels out a larger portion of the "rebate." For ease of mathematics, suppose my carbon rebate is $1000. If I pay $1000 in carbon tax, my rebate cancels the tax out and I have a net $0 from the program. But if I use less carbon, and only pay $600 in carbon tax, my rebate gives me a net $400. On this point, I absolutely agree with you.
      But now return to the 10 min mark - notice that Freeland accuses Poilievre of "cuts, cuts, cuts," because he wants to axe the carbon tax. She goes on to say, "He wants to cut the support that Canadians are getting from the price on pollution. That's $1800 Alberta families won't get." But wait! Freeland completely dismisses the fact that there would no longer be a carbon tax in place! Of course there wouldn't be a rebate: there wouldn't be a tax to fund it!
      The argument I'm trying to make is this: Let's suppose the carbon rebate really did offset our carbon tax (an argument I don't buy due to the numbers), as the Liberals promote. Why would we stop using O&G? To save a few $hundreds more? But doesn't switching from reliable O&G to the inconvenience of, say, wind, wipe out any proposed saving? It's true that we could get a larger portion of that $1800 rebate (for a family of 4 in Alberta), but that $hundreds in saving is nothing compared to the benefits that accrue to the family from using O&G!
      O&G (gasoline in particular), is an inelastic good. We use the same amount of fuel whether it's $1.00/litre, or $1.25/litre. We need it, and it gives us value (driving to work to make money, taking vacations with the family, not freezing to death in the winter, etc). When we take this inelastic effect into account, it's usually far more beneficial to let the rebate offset our usage of carbon, than it is to transfer to a "O&G free" way of life.
      In fact, as proven by the majority still using O&G, it's better for us to pay more to use oil and gas, and totally cancel out our carbon rebate in the process, than it is for us to switch to wind, solar, etc!
      What I should've said was this - the rebate is too large, or the carbon tax is too small, to make any real difference in our consumption of carbon. By giving us the rebate, Freeland and the Liberals are giving us an incentive to not transition away from O&G. If a man's carbon tax is $1000 and the rebate is $1000, it's as though he didn't pay any carbon tax. True, he could move to an electric powered car and save $500 on carbon tax/year, but the higher cost of the vehicle, along with the inconvenience of long trips, increased fill-up times, scarce fill-up stations, and so on, imposes a cost on him that's far higher than $500.
      Thus, the carbon rebate is really an incentive to keep us using carbon (as pricey as they're trying to make it), and the tax is a disaster.
      Thank you for your constructive comment! I appreciate the ability to try and make my points clearer!

  • @frankshandyman5224
    @frankshandyman5224 2 місяці тому

    Gets exposed? Damn I hope not my eyes couldn't handle the burn from all the fugliness

  • @onemorequarter1087
    @onemorequarter1087 2 місяці тому

    😂the government wants ya'll to stay up to date. Ya'll have questions yet? Or ya'll just going to roll over or start demanding answers from your GOVERNMENT DADDIES

  • @danieltallon5087
    @danieltallon5087 2 місяці тому

    UA-cam unscribed man. Sorry.