Hi Ivo. I believe the reason you are seeing both positive and negative voltages on the sawtooth is because your oscilloscope is set to use AC coupling.
that would be a fun solution. Can you see it in the scope shot? I'll have to check. That would also mean I would have used much higher voltages, which explains why my capacitors almost fried. Interesting! And thanks for pointing it out. I do wonder how the voltages could be so high, with such a small sparkgap.
It looks like there's an 'AC' logo in the 'C1' probe settings area in bottom left-hand corner of the scope screenshot at the 15 minute point in the video. It looks like you have about 8 kV peak-to-peak (assuming the short negative-going spike is an overshoot caused by stray inductance, although there may be other explanations), so with the dielectric breakdown voltage of air being somewhere between 1.5 and 3 kV per mm, the airgap should be around 4 mm. Would this be about right? I don't think we can tell from the video what it actually was. Keep up the good work! This is all very interesting.
@@johnwale2886 You are right, I just checked, and indeed I was AC coupling my probe. no wonder those caps didn't like it. I think the gap was less then 4mm, but it also is depended on humidity, which was probably very low during testing. Thanks for pointing this out!
Hi Ivo. Nice experiment. Did you try the system without AC coupling? If so, did you obtain a different read-out on the scope? That is, a read-out with no negative swing? Cheers
Great attempt at Aether field proof👍🏽. Having conducted similar research myself, you have only one remaining thing to do, and that is " operate the plates in a vacuum." This will be the only way to prove the Aether field. I personally know that it exists. There is, though, a potentially more effective way to interact with it. Good luck with your researching 👏🏼
OMG! It actually worked! I can't believe you actually transported that piece of tape @18:30! I wouldn't have believed it if you wouldn't have caught the moment occurring live on camera! AWESOME!
11:25 This negative 6kV voltage is even larger than the 4kV positive voltage. And it is much quicker produced. I intend to use this insight, with my 4 coil setup, which resembles the Tesla Magnifying Transmitter (TMT). The big challenge is to shape the 2 displacement currents from the symmetric impulse.
Nature abhors a vacuum. Do you have a schematic or supplier for the ZVS? And then you mention the 30 meter disk with coil in the middle. This is along the lines of T. T. Brown. The common theme of the UFO undersides is the 3 or 5 node configuration.
Excellent research! Your metaphor of the hand s Displacing the water is excellent in describing the differences between transverse and longitudinal waves. Thank you!
Believe it or not just a few months ago two lights came down out of the night sky and one of them came closer to the boat about thirty feet off of the water and it was a metallic sphere about two hundred feet in diameter with an aura around it but they wouldn't stay long enough for me to get a picture. When they left it was so fast it was unbelievable .... Gravity is not what everyone thinks, great channel by the way ....
Jean-Louis Naudin and Prof Searl build and demonstrates their working space ship models, without revealing any circuits at all. Thus made their secrets a profit for the grave. Thanks for sharing your circuits and findings with us. Most appreciate.
I appreciate all your work. I'm glad that you are working on these projects. Documenting reproducible results and functional designs is very important.
they are but if you cant put a meter onvit they dont want it gotta have the masses pay for everything. heck at one point the working Americans held half the globe wealth. cant have to many people know they built nikola tesla devices. consider how many humans where born before him and after. yet no one else figured it out either ??
Eugene Podkletnov not only made gravity shielding superconductors, but he built a large capacitor bank and discharged them through a super conductor spark gap producing powerfully scalar waves that bent steel.
Interesting, thanks! ""Podkletnov... will only provide assistance if the research is carried out in the... world of open development." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Podkletnov
You’ve restored my interest in the veracity of non-linear time theories, because to me what you’ve just described is a technology with similar characteristics to the descriptions of the technological features or effects from people that purportedly witness UFO, UAP, or non-human aircraft… especially from the disks or circular configuration you described in a more practical amplified system, the orientation of the fields you demonstrated from them with your hands, the immense heat (and presumably magnetic at practical scales) signatures some have noted in their reports- namely, and even this is directly from your example, accounts in which the aircraft were seeing rising out of or submerging into bodies of water. 3 possibilities typically associated in the realm of science-fiction: 1. These craft are anthropogenic but withheld from public view, and witnesses are just unintended bystanders of government or intra-government activity using technology confiscated around the time of Nikola Tesla’s death or recovered under the questionably extraterrestrial circumstances of the Roswell crash in 1947 (there could even be a connection between the two events). 2. They are extraterrestrial craft from as many as 12 different sources, species or interests, and their presence or intentions may be known or unknown by intragovernment entities. 3. (This could still apply to one of the twelve in No. 2) They are us in one of a few contexts: 1. The elite or government of No. 1 2. Subterranean descendants of survivors from planetary events much further back than traceable records. 3. Descendants of modern humans- us, and the growing awareness of their presence indicates a pivotal moment in their future timeline. All of that is ridiculous, and I’m not claiming any of them as true.. but I will say that much larger groups of people are certain that much more ridiculous things are true.. Point is, how cool would it be if the future timeline scenario made you the John Connor of the propulsion systems we refer to today as alien that defy the laws of physics?
Believe it or not just a few months ago two lights came down out of the night sky and one of them came closer to the boat about thirty feet off of the water and it was a metallic sphere about two hundred feet in diameter with an aura around it but they wouldn't stay long enough for me to get a picture. When they left it was so fast it was unbelievable ....
I live in the Country. One Day me and my In-laws were sitting on the Porch talking. We noticed a single Cloud on a cloudless day. About the time we were thinking that’s weird, the bottom half of a circular large craft came from underneath the Cloud. It was like one was turning sideways? Anyway, about that time it just disappeared. The Cloud dissipated and it was gone! It just disappeared faster than you could blink. It was obvious it was a Metal Craft! You explain this if you don’t think UFO’s or UAP’s aren’t real. We have also seen Lights a Night doing strange things that weren’t any type of Plane or Helicopter… like Hovering at Altitude then taking off in a flash across the Horizon.
Master ivo, you can improve the propulsion effect of the impulse dielectric field by increasing the capacitance of the capacitors and also increasing the space between the spark gap which will increase the voltage and reduce the frequency Which allows for a large sudden shift in the ether field that forcefully pushes against the suspended capacitor plate
@@MasterIvo It'd be nice to see the capacitors replaced with a similar series-parallel arrangement of microwave oven capacitors. Typical value for one of those is 0.8 microfarads at 2.1 kV, instead of the pico- and nanofarad range ones. I'm getting 0.13 joules for the 3.4 nF at 9 kV but the force acting on the hanging plates seems to be a lot less than that.
To increase the effect you might like to experiment with the build of the large end capacitor . TT Brown (and Bifield ) noted that the propulsive effect became stronger using asymmetric capacitance… ie, one side of quite large difference of area to the other. ..there are various setups they did that achieve this and still limit corona discharge. … Fantastic work here Iva, as always!
This blows my mind. I always wondered how spaceships that don't burn rocket fuel would be made possible. Thank you for the clairity you bring when explaining the stuff...Aether Physics!!
It would be interesting to do the experiment with the condo under a vacuum bell to make sure that it is not a polarisation effect of the air molecules.
High energy doesn't only "polarize" air medium, it really affects aether, try high voltage in vacuum, you'll see it. Peace mate. ✌️ ua-cam.com/video/WwCZizjfGOk/v-deo.html
Good job. For better proof that motion is caused by aether inertia, You should place "swinging capacitor" in Faraday's cage (to eliminate interaction with some external electric fields) - i think.
You have proven this concept. I was a school dropout after 9nth. I was much harassed by others for my aberrant ways. So I took up working in a big postal delivery terminal at a young age. There I experienced some quite unusual phenomena. One was, we were operating manual pallet trucks and we had a lot of floor space to play around on. Soon I found out that I could swing the lifterarm forward while disengaging the lift mechanism, meanwhile standing on the forked body and not touching the ground with my feet. So no kicking the floor. Slowly bring the lifterarm forward and then pull it back fast and come to an abrupt halt. The truck begins to careen forwards. Repeat and accelerate. Get a decent speed. The wheels are engaged in a pulsed action that overcomes the threshold of inertia/or/ friction force between the wheels and the floor forwards while on the return of the leverarm it's too slow to overcome this inertia threshold. Remember that when you ride the pallet truck like this font becomes back and back becomes front. A little besides this point, we also experienced so much static electric buildup in this place, we often got electric shocks around conveyor belts and plastic crates. Sometime we saw some small paper or cardboard fly suddenly from the floor up to an unknown attractor, usually near the conveyers. This was my first learning place "academy of physics" indeed.
I cant belive i missed that video lol. Anyways, im glad i came across your new video. This is absolutely amazing. Great great work Mr ivo. Thankyou for sharing your work.
Can you redo this experiment while having the plates in a vacuum chamber? There is a certain amount of ions in the air. It is conceivable that the plates could be pushing against charged ions in the air. At a first glance at least, haven't crunched any numbers.
this is amazing, congratulations of the video and exhaustive explanation, i wait in the future your ampliation and perfectioning of the stuf anxiously.
I'd highly suggest trying those tests with copper on one side, aluminum on another. Also in almost all of these cases you do not need to ground the system together, you can use different grounds (about 200 pounds of iron will give you about 1hp/745wattws of sinkage power). Use a single wire then use a Avramenko circuit to convert the resonate wave which is pulsing back and forth on the single wire into a DC current.
Ether is just energy and the inertia is one of its specifications. Ether = mc2. You have proved the inertia and at the same time the existence of ether. Bingo! Congratulations! Thanks a lot!
@@ash_bordeaux An experiment was recently done to collide photons and it produced a handful of electrons and positrons. If a photon is thought of the hysteresis of a saturating level or rotational level of energy in an electromagnetic wave, then the wave could be thought to propagate in aether. If the photon is just some form of saturation or rotary in aether, then the relationship of aether to matter is "lowest pressure zone possible"
@@FVLMEN Right, Electricity magnetism and dielectricity are Aether perturbation; also, this can be produced divergently or convergently. (Theoria apophasis)
@@ash_bordeaux Aether - Earth - W ater - F ire. Just think about reasons why human beings have to deliver natural freedom to others (Financial system, money), Yeah; Energie monopolies! And here is shown the hidden true science, all the knowledge about Energie is in the Aether for free.
Hi Ivo. Excellent experiment. It reminds me of Thomas Townsend Brown's etheric propulsion experiment in 1927 paper he submitted. This was further experimented by Dimitriou using a RC-Noton Sawtooth generator with the same capacitor as yours although he used copper and aluminium, but failed to verify the etheric field propulsion with longitudinal waves. I am glad to see your successful experiment. Congrats!
@@MasterIvo Ivo, have you heard of Paul A. LaViolette, and his book on "The Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion", (check book page #341 and 342). if you don't have one I can send you a pdf for your reference library. Let me know. Keep up the incredible research work. I love your experiments and sharing. I have your personal email address. Stay safe my friend.
Is it possible to repeat this experiment in a vacuum, in a metal container, where the container and one side of the plate capacitor are grounded? The metal container would not be 'dielectric' and the grounded side of the plate capacitor should have no 'electrostatic' attraction to the grounded metal container. Then if motion could be induced in both directions, could it help quiet the skeptics? I'm a bit confused about the whole business, but no worries, I do enjoy your diligent search for truth and the fun of watching demonstrations. Thank you! I guess I should have read the others comments first... Vacuum and Faraday cage...
I agree with the inertia concepts mostly. I was going in that same direction for different reasons. I think you need to rule out the ion fan effect in your capacitor though (not a vacuum). I've been chasing something for 20 years that I think is hiding behind center-mass changes. It's frustrating, but I think inertia is not a constant for a particular mass. That's what the Strong force hides.
Hi Ivo, would you be interested to perform the same experiment, but recreate the spark gap component to be a sealed tube filled with a noble gas and other elements, be it solid, liquid or gas? Try each noble gas to see if there is a difference or relationship with valence. Also try it in a vacuum. The air in the spark gap is a filament of sorts, try different elemental filaments to see if there is any noticeable inertia output. I'd love to see and hear the results!
Make a 'ground plate', that can be placed next to the capacitor, and I believe that you will see a MUCH greater movement. A gentleman from several years ago, showed how he could take a coil of wire, and impart an A/C voltage(110 v) on the coil, and it would 'jump' up off the table, and hover.
So a couple years ago a watched a video on a channel that has since then been deleted. A person had made what was basically Tesla's Violet Ray device. His schematic for that was basically the same as yours up until the plates. In place of the plates there was a small maybe 1.5mtr high tower structure with double speaker wires winding upwards, one above the other. Bottom layers grounded, the top layers ending in a large metallic ball that was positioned on the tower. When turned on he could hold his hands near it and the sparks would be clearly visible. I digress. The point is that 1) he used 3 in series spark gaps. He was very clear on that saying "not 2, not 4 but 3!". And 2) his spark gaps were actually done by using the heads of large bolts (about the thickness of my thumb). He had flattened them and used the large surface area of those bolts to generate the spark gap. On this also he was very clear stating "you don't want a spark, you want plasma". There was a close up of the spark gap and it did look precisely like plasma io sparks. When he was asked why this person said "otherwise capacitors go boom". Anyway, i know very little of electrics but i thought maybe it could be of any use to you (if you are still testing out spark gaps).
Nice demonstration Ivo! There are two, resultant forces being demonstrated on the displacement current having gained inertial energy. The first is the slight physical movement of the plate. The other, is in the depth of negative discharge, well past the zero point, as you display on the scope. The rate of change is so sudden, that the current movement simply cannot be suddenly stopped., proof of its huge gain in inertia. I'm pretty sure it would actually go even further negative, but is being bound by the eventual turn on of the HV diode and current being back-introduced into the secondary of the of flyback transformer, which acts as an electrical brake. If you scope the primary, you will see this back reflection being mirrored across the transformer. This is a problem with Tesla's claim of using unipolar currents exclusively. It is simply impossible to isolate the gain of inertia of the rapid spark gap current from the driver circuit. I believe that Tesla really only saw this in one case: When he exploded the current carrying wire, forming a more complete isolated circuit condition. However, you only get a chance to witness one event before needing to renew the current carrying wire. It is this early experiment that lead Tesla to conclude the Aether itself is being hyper accelerated, and is capable of traveling through even very thick copper shielding, which produced a stinging effect on his body. I'm still struggling to find a method to produce the ever elusive, uni-directional impulse. The closest I've gotten is using a HV switch (as we both have made in the past) to gate a spark gap on, then open the switch. But voltage range and semiconductor switching speeds are a big limiting factor. The search continues!
It seems the angle of the saw can be compared to shaped charges. The same violent spike in both cases ua-cam.com/video/CpVVGk2OfQQ/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/NoetLNb1Fc4/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/K-3cTsvI7ss/v-deo.html
"the displacement current having gained inertial energy" on this... An experiment was recently done to collide photons and it produced a few electrons and positrons (keeping those two apart to be determined!). In the context of aether theory I like this idea of "current having gained inertial energy". If a locked EM wave can move a "photon" into being, energy at some level should be able to move matter that already exists
Hi Ivo, thank you for sharing this. This method of field propulsion is very similar to the Biefeld-Brown effect. Not the electrohydrodynamic effect but that of a force produced by an asymmetric capacitor when a high voltage is applied. I am very eager to find out if you might see an increase in thrust by simply reducing the size of one the copper plates. edit: (large electrode = positive, small electrode = negative)
So you could have should be able to change the direction of the Capacitor Plates to change direction of the Space Craft? Could you use a Tesla Coil in place of the Fly Back Transformer and the Spark Gap? Thanks for making these Videos. They are Very Interesting. I definitely need to Learn a Lot more about Electronics than I currently understand.😁👍👍
I am only about 2 min 25 sec in.. But I am wondering if you have experimented with magnetically quenched spark gaps? Very interesting! Thanks for sharing!
Hi Ivo, I have watched all your videos with interest. I have a comment on your high voltage capacitors. The values in uF of your capacitors follow well known formula for capacitors in parallel or series. However, the voltage ratings do not follow the same rules. If you have two 100-volt capacitors in series with 200 volts across them the actual voltage sharing depends on the leakage of each capacitor. If one has higher leakage, then it will have less volts across it and the other will have higher volts across it. In the worst case one may have nearly 0 volts across it and the other will have the full 200 volts across it. In order to balance them it is normal to add a resistor across each capacitor to share the voltage. The resistors values will be significantly less than the internal resistance of the capacitors and obviously rated at the correct voltage. Also your negative overshoot is due to the resonance of the capacitor along with the stray inductance in the layout.
yes I feel you are right about the overshoot by resonance. but still would it be that high? higher than the source voltage? shouldn't it be lower (due to resistance)? And also yes, the series capacitors should have parallel resistance (a lot higher than the esr, not lower right) to balance the voltage out over the caps. but with equal esr (using high quality caps) it should not be that bad I think, although I'm not so sure... until now I only had problems with cheap chinese caps with large esr differences
Nice video. Einstein´s General Relativity field equations already include through the energy tensor of the emg. field the relationship between the energy of the field (which is equivalent to mass, therefore inertia) and gravity (space-time curvature). Dynamical property (mass-energy content of a region) is put in relationship with a geometrical property (space-time curvature). I wonder why don´t you devote yourself to study Physics, with such a great talent for experiments and such a great curiosity. You will succeed, no doubt. My recommendation, look for professional physicists that can become your friends. Not all them are closed-mind people 😉
I have so many comments Ivo. But first a health warning. Tesla described different pulse rates, some harmful, higher frequencies less so. Don't be accidentally using low pulse rates. Your spark gap cathode will make a lot more EVOs if it is tapering to a needle shape. You call it displacement energy/field, but it's EVO rings. They go in many directions and zig zag, and try to find a path to ground. Some will be attracted to the hanging plate, particularly the back side/grounded side. When they strike that flat copper plate, some will persist as rings on the surface, those rings destroy gravity while they persist as rings. This allows the other side to push unopposed, and I think that is what is causing your plate to swing. I can give you a copy of Ken Shoulders patent, if you can't locate it. Please catch up with the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project stuff, and join in our excitement with what's being revealed. Place pristine aluminum foil sheets various places, and notice how the EVOs damage them. You can build some capacitor-like home-made shielding with alternating layers of aluminum foil and dielectric films. Those EVOs will cause mysterious failures of your other components, if not shielded.
You SHOULD be able to place resistors in between the " - " side and ground, thus biasing the lower voltage to something close to zero, and have a much greater, mostly positive charge.
You should spend time looking at "force between plates of parallel plate capacitors", "energy stored in parallel plate capacitors", "Force sensing capacitor", and "MEMS accelerometers" where they use the change in frequency of an LRC circuit for sensing. Lots of resources. Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation
Have you been able to demonstrate this effect in vacuum? NASA argued against the asymmetric capacitors of beifeld brown effect lifters, is caused by corona discharge etc. However several papers since have shown the ionic displacement is several orders of magnitude too small to create such lift. To me I see a lot of parallels in your research with what I have been researching. I appreciate you sharing your thoughts. And glad to see someone actually revisiting Tesla’s aether in context with field propulsion topics
@@MasterIvo I think the issue with vacuum is tied to your concept of the dielectric field. When we go into vacuum we are going to change the dielectric constants around anything we are working with. So when moving to vacuum we must find a way to maintain the same dielectric field to have the same effect. Why the biefeld brown effect starts to break down in vacuum is exactly this... not due to a lack of atmosphere preventing ionic thrust. But because the capacitive effect is losing dielectric medium... If we can find the relationship between dielectric field, dielectric medium, I think we can start to properly evaluate in vacuum behavior.
@@MasterIvo Personally, I am interested in non standard dielectrics, or active dielectrics. I think that's all I can say publicly at this time. But if you think about materials that could provide active/reactive dielectric potential, it should make sense which materials I am talking about.
The effect shown is almost certainly due to interaction with the surrounding air. Both capacitor plates are charged - one attracts -ve charges, the other +ve. The latter are more massive, and so the plate follows Newton's law of action/reaction. A proper test would be done in a vacuum. It's a useful video and channel however. Thank you. PS: I suggest a metal reflector plate behind one of the capacitor ones, to ensure that any impulse wave occurs in one direction only.
Love your work Ivo, you should look into the works of Thomas Townsend Brown, who was researching the works of Tesla and mastered this effect or similar effects outside and within a vacuum in the early 1920’s, heaps of UA-cam videos on him! Can you tell me if there is any similarity to the effects seen in my video on antigravity or ....antigravi tea! Sorry for the plug. I believe the induction cooker is a ZVS style circuit and above the cooker I have placed roughly 28 turn pancake coil as per Tesla’s patent. I did wind other coils as per your instructions from one of your videos but found a significant voltage drop using that style of winding. Anyway, I have limited knowledge and would like your perspective and experience. Even if the effect experienced is different by what I use as a power source for my kettle, would you think this would have a similar effect in a vacuum? Towards the end of my video you can see the effect when switching off and on as you did in your video when the induction cooker recognises the boiled kettle as an insufficient load.
So. If i had a conductive sphere that was charged to a vey high voltage and part of the surface of the sphere had a piezoelectric material that i could activate, would a longitudinal wave be sent outward from the piezo into the already highly stressed aeather. Would that then modulate the aeather?
Yes! the sudden change in voltage would create a longitudinal displacement current, which I see as the third electrical field (next to the dielectric and magnetic fields)
I'm immediately interested on how stacked plates would interact and if the waves from one plate to the others can be timed to create positive interference or even stack the impulses so they can be steered, kind a like musk's antenna, field aligned waves angled in toward each other to create peaks and troughs.
I believe the ionic lifter is a far more powerful example. More importantly. Shouldn't the system be timed to resume charging as the impulse returns to zero? Welding leads jumping as an arc is passed is also an example of this effect.
Maybe I don't fully understand your question. you want to start charging after the discharge returns to zero? so, the positive charge, discharges to negative 6kV (which is not normal at all) and then it first should discharge back to zero (I assume from using the diode and the flyback transformer to ground it out). What would be the benefit?
Hi Master Ivo, I have a question on using radiant energy/dielectricity for field propulsion. According to Ken the only way for a field craft to cancel inertia is through an omnidirectional magnetic field to isolate the craft from the mass acceleration between it and surrounding space. In your opinion, would surrounding a craft in this radiant energy also isolate it and the occupants from the effects of inertia? Cheers.
Really enjoyed the video! You mentioned the the circuit can be reversed and that the force could pull or push dependant. Could two circuits be combined to push and pull simultaneously?
Ok, this is worth a chuckle BUT on the very latest skin walker ranch episode, they see a spike when there's a light in the sky. It is always 1.6G. Building 2 together for push-pull? Teflon tape for dielectric is -190 on the tribo scale and is cheap. Or filled polymers are 5kv per 0.025mm! I do BGas. Looking into Naphion
Have you already tried putting something big metallic or magnetic next to it, to see if this movement could be from electromagnetic fields pushing on each other? Or how can you proof this movement isn't some electro magnetic / static effect with surrounding emf or something like that? If I understand correctly you try to push against the ether?
Are you sure the spark isn't creating shock waves of hot air like thunder and lightning? Also, does the effect work with inverse square law regarding displacement vs separation? This is so interesting - could you do this in a vacuum? - thanks for such an excellent summer break experiment - CM
that was the first idea, but way to complicated, I prefer the simplicity of a swing. But you can easily replicate it and test it (and post the link to the video)
@@MasterIvo here is a video from 13 years ago when I did a very similar pendulum swing with asymmetrical capacitor UFO shape and also granite slab on a balance. apologies for the potato cam ua-cam.com/video/-IDcQBFvh7M/v-deo.html
The faces of the capacitor must necessarily be aluminum and copper, should it only go with copper on both sides? Is the size of the capacitor (100mm wide by 160mm long) is good? or should I make it a little too big?
Hi buddy I had something similar with an Aether experiment. I think it's like the magnetic v dielectric shocking the Aether. Like a balloon being pumped up and let down. It comes from the spark gap which opens and closes the Aether. The positive drives out but then collapses which allows the dielectric in. In this way a new mode of movement will allow matter to be shifted into another place or dimension. Regards DC
@@MasterIvo hi again, Aether is hard to imagine.from your wording think neg = static so my answer is yes sort of. Here is my take on what happens. I send a positive pulse out and on the collapse neg returns. I found this out by accident. Video link to follow.. regards DC.
Could you use a 555 timer and second system wired to the opposite polarity the cause alternating discharge values that build without strain on the capacitor bank? If timed correctly the impulse generated would effectively add together (or "stack") for greater impulse.
Ivo, you have become the new Thomas Townsend Brown! Electric field propulsion. You are probably already aware of his work? But if not I'd recommend you look into it. Great video, Thanks!
strange, I keep responding, but this message seems to return every time. AI must be messing up again. one final time, I hope someone else will test it in a vacuum as it has not got my priority. I made sure no corona discharge ion wind could influence the test by rounding the edges and painting the copper surfaces with epoxy
Very nice work Ivo. A buy one get one free for proof of concept with Aether and field propulsion! Glad to see you going for the ZVS.. I think it is a self resonating Don Smith in a box.... lol.. onwards and upwards
Wouldn't repulsion be faster and have a greater energy burst. You could put magnets on each side of a small linier rail then put 2 magnets on the moving part with the barring or cart. as long as the fields oppose each other then the cart would constantly go back and forth. All you would need is a push from a electro magnet to increase speed.
Like it. There have been experiments showing the influence of a highly charged plate on gravitation. More recently Grebennikov is said to use a plate that he discharged to get his flying platform going. Just talking...
Would you be willing to repeat this setup but with a dc bias across the plate capacitor on the order of 4kv?...also, did you establish the breakdown voltage of the plate capacitor?
If you do not mind, in your next video can you maybe add a short video/screen shot of the oscilloscope at 1 nanosecond range or as close as you can get to it. Preferably for the impulse energy experiment not the propulsion one. Thanks
no, I think not. dielectric field would be extremely weak, so the displacement current from the fast changing voltage would also be extremely weak. but you could do the experiment yourself with extremely high voltages. I won't.
@@MasterIvo I am not a electrical engineer but why would the dielectric field be weak and how would that change the strength of the displacement current if its just dependent on the change? Is it because the lines of force always have to close on themselves because I thought that only applied to magnetism or am I misremembering dollard? Also If I wanted to email you how should I go about this. I want to send you a pdf but cant coz its youtube :(
I think I just realized something. Why not set it up like a Tesla coil except on the terminal end put the flat plate? Didn’t the original Tesla coil use the same impulse waveforms you and Dollard talk about? Only thing that might make this difficult is the corona discharge. Also have you looked into griffin g brocks research into shadow graph rays and whatnot? He powered his single electrode bulbs with a regular Tesla coil too
I think there are a missing part. There must be an added magnetic force that make it more efficient. a none longitudinal flow have an inherent magnetic field, but that works as a counterforce. The other obtion are a longitudinal flow where instead of counter the force its add to the force, by that dialectic and magnetic field goes in the same direction not in an ancle of each other. Have not seen that yet in an experiment, except on some paper.
Your R&D plan for developing a starship propulsion system inspired by Nikola Tesla's radiant energy concept is comprehensive and well-structured. It encapsulates the essential steps required for taking a concept from theoretical underpinnings to practical application, including: 1. **Executive Summary**: Clearly defines the objective and sets the stage for an innovative approach to space propulsion. 2. **Introduction**: Establishes a solid background and rationale, justifying the need for a new type of propulsion system based on Tesla's work. 3. **Theoretical Foundation**: Lays out a plan for a thorough literature review and theoretical exploration, which is critical for grounding the project in scientific principles. 4. **Research and Development Plan**: The staged approach is methodical and pragmatic, addressing both the technical challenges and the progression from theory to practice. Each stage has well-defined objectives and actions, facilitating focused efforts and clear milestones for assessment. 5. **Budget and Funding**: Recognizes the importance of a detailed budget and identifies potential funding sources, which are crucial for the project's viability. 6. **Partnerships and Collaboration**: Highlights the significance of collaborative efforts, which can leverage additional expertise and resources. 7. **Compliance and Safety**: Acknowledges the importance of regulatory compliance and safety, reflecting a responsible approach to innovation. 8. **Conclusion**: Emphasizes the project's potential impact on space exploration, reinforcing the importance of the initiative. 9. **Appendices and Visual/Technical Supplements**: Enhance the proposal's comprehensibility and accessibility, providing critical details and visualizations to support the project narrative. To further refine and enhance your R&D plan, consider the following suggestions: - **Technology Scouting and Benchmarking**: In addition to reviewing Tesla's patents and related documents, assess current technologies and patents in the field of space propulsion and energy harvesting to identify potential synergies or advancements that could augment your approach. - **Expert Consultation**: Engage with experts in Tesla’s technologies, space propulsion, and energy harvesting early in the process to validate the theoretical feasibility and guide the prototype design. - **Risk Management**: Develop a detailed risk management plan that identifies potential technical and project risks, along with strategies for mitigation. This is especially important for pioneering projects with significant unknowns. - **Sustainability and Long-Term Impact**: Consider the long-term sustainability and potential environmental impacts of the propulsion system, both on Earth and in space. This could enhance the project’s appeal to certain investors and regulatory bodies. - **Public Engagement and Education**: Plan for public engagement and educational initiatives to build interest and support for your project. This could include public lectures, publications, and participation in science fairs and conferences. - **Intellectual Property Strategy**: Develop a clear strategy for protecting the intellectual property generated during the project, ensuring that innovations can be commercialized and used to fund further research. Incorporating these elements can strengthen your plan, making it more resilient, impactful, and likely to attract the necessary support and funding. Could you do something with this idea?
@@AlexanderKnotts Thanks again! I must say field propulsion is not on the top of my list. Free Electricity for all (FEFA) is number one. next are the health effects and last but not least my personal favorite, field propulsion.
@@MasterIvo Yea; I finally made a new video. Health issues really slow me down the last years. I have a number of videos half ready, about generating electricity, and some about the vortex. Wish I had more time for my real passions: vortex, lift, propulsion. Do you think there could be a link between aerodynamics and electrodynamics? I live in Amsterdam. Maybe one day we can meet. Groetjes, Giesbert.
@@GiesbertNijhuis Yes I think there is definitely a link, both work from fluid (including air) dynamics. The ring vortrx/toroid is in my opinion achieved when resonant voltage and current are in phase, which happens in my extra coil (L4). Since a vortex normally wants to move, it can produce force when it is hold stationary (around the coil). this explains why the earth is being "pumped" as I see a 5A sine wave on the earth ground. yes maybe in the future we could meet. its a 1.5 hour drive
@@MasterIvo I made a 2D virtual fluid (is going to be a movie) and what is coolest is to see the effect of pressure on how the fluid flows. I see electricity as currents in a fluid under very-very high pressure. A 5A sine wave on the earth ground? Like everywhere in the real ground? Could that be induction/a resonance from the grid? How many hertz? But.. I don't know much about electricity really, I can not talk your level, but working on it!
@@GiesbertNijhuis 2d virtual fluid flow, woupd love to see that (simulate resonance). the 5A is on earth ground of the secondary coil (which has also got an extra coil connected in series at the other side of it). frequency is around 180kc/s which is equal to. the resonance of the secondary and extra coil. it seems it is pumping the earth, like wardenclyfe.
I 👀 what you did there Ivo!!! Thanks 😁 I love the shirt 👕❤😍 Love your work! Love you! Keep it up my buddy!! Soon WE "Tesla Puzzlers" are gonna change/save the world!!!! ❤ 🌎 ❤
This could be the beginning of a wonderful invention and a new form of propulsion but to prove that this is aether and not a capacitive effect with the air it must also work in a vacuum.
Doing it in vacuum would be a good proof that it's not charging air molecules and getting a charge repulsion phenomenon - some kind of ionic breeze. You could do AB with ambient air and whatever (partial) vacuum you can get in a chamber.
@@allanh5618 I don't think it is ionic as the plate looks insulated. However air is conductive at those voltages so a capacitive charge could build on the plate surface and be discharged pushing off the mass of the air ionicly.
@@dee5556 I think I'd want the vacuum chamber walls far from the spark gap as well, and probably grounded, to avoid possible charge building there, too.
@@allanh5618 agreed. The force is week so if there was a few inches gap, that would be enough to tell. If it is mostly aether causing the movement then there should be little difference. The larger the gap the more apparent the outcome will be. This could wind up becoming the proof needed to prove the existence of the aether if in fact Ivo is correct. Or it could wind up becoming a way to lower air friction that causes drag. Either way its very interesting.
@@dee5556 Ah, that's an interesting thought, that this could be way to prove the aether. What are sensors, at core, except things that react to phenomena in a perceivable way, so Ivo's wobbling plate becomes a means to prove 'something' is 'there' and attribute it to the Aether. Alas, it would likely be particleized and called something like 'The Quantum Anti-Vacuum.'
Hi Ivo. I believe the reason you are seeing both positive and negative voltages on the sawtooth is because your oscilloscope is set to use AC coupling.
that would be a fun solution. Can you see it in the scope shot? I'll have to check. That would also mean I would have used much higher voltages, which explains why my capacitors almost fried. Interesting! And thanks for pointing it out.
I do wonder how the voltages could be so high, with such a small sparkgap.
It looks like there's an 'AC' logo in the 'C1' probe settings area in bottom left-hand corner of the scope screenshot at the 15 minute point in the video. It looks like you have about 8 kV peak-to-peak (assuming the short negative-going spike is an overshoot caused by stray inductance, although there may be other explanations), so with the dielectric breakdown voltage of air being somewhere between 1.5 and 3 kV per mm, the airgap should be around 4 mm. Would this be about right? I don't think we can tell from the video what it actually was. Keep up the good work! This is all very interesting.
@@johnwale2886 You are right, I just checked, and indeed I was AC coupling my probe. no wonder those caps didn't like it.
I think the gap was less then 4mm, but it also is depended on humidity, which was probably very low during testing.
Thanks for pointing this out!
Hi Ivo. Nice experiment. Did you try the system without AC coupling? If so, did you obtain a different read-out on the scope? That is, a read-out with no negative swing? Cheers
So what you are saying is that a highly qualified 'open source researcher' doesn't know how to operate an oscilloscope?
Great attempt at Aether field proof👍🏽. Having conducted similar research myself, you have only one remaining thing to do, and that is " operate the plates in a vacuum." This will be the only way to prove the Aether field. I personally know that it exists. There is, though, a potentially more effective way to interact with it. Good luck with your researching 👏🏼
Luckily I don't need to prove the aether is everywhere
OMG! It actually worked! I can't believe you actually transported that piece of tape @18:30! I wouldn't have believed it if you wouldn't have caught the moment occurring live on camera! AWESOME!
Zoom out to prove you're not pushing the capacitor. Critics will grill this point.
11:25 This negative 6kV voltage is even larger than the 4kV positive voltage.
And it is much quicker produced.
I intend to use this insight, with my 4 coil setup, which resembles the Tesla Magnifying Transmitter (TMT).
The big challenge is to shape the 2 displacement currents from the symmetric impulse.
Nature abhors a vacuum.
Do you have a schematic or supplier for the ZVS?
And then you mention the 30 meter disk with coil in the middle. This is along the lines of T. T. Brown. The common theme of the UFO undersides is the 3 or 5 node configuration.
@@phyzxengrmoore6928 yes like resonant transformation.
this is the zvs plus flyback I bought:
a.aliexpress.com/_vSoNMJ
Absoolutely Amazing Work My New Friend!
I look forward to connecting with you further good Sir!
This was a very well done proof of concept demonstration with a great explanation accompanying it!
Great work Master Ivo!
If you pump or even resonate the circuit parametrically you should not only greatly amplify the effect but also the non-linearity.
Excellent research! Your metaphor of the hand s Displacing the water is excellent in describing the differences between transverse and longitudinal waves. Thank you!
Believe it or not just a few months ago two lights came down out of the night sky and one of them came closer to the boat about thirty feet off of the water and it was a metallic sphere about two hundred feet in diameter with an aura around it but they wouldn't stay long enough for me to get a picture. When they left it was so fast it was unbelievable ....
Gravity is not what everyone thinks, great channel by the way ....
Jean-Louis Naudin and Prof Searl build and demonstrates their working space ship models, without revealing any circuits at all.
Thus made their secrets a profit for the grave.
Thanks for sharing your circuits and findings with us.
Most appreciate.
I appreciate all your work. I'm glad that you are working on these projects. Documenting reproducible results and functional designs is very important.
Thanks, I hope many will be inspired to replicate and experiment with this knowledge. (and prove it works in a vacuum)
Guys its a totally different science
Isn't
Taking energy from the vacuum
90% of viewers are apparently not smart enough to hit the like button (1:10 currently). This is your best video yet, Ivo. Excellent work, sir.
Thanks!
I wish more people were following this line of experimentation.
me too
Slowly but surely we are making it happen!
People lost interest in electromagnetism a century ago unfortunately
U guy have good idea in experimenting
Ler u know
they are but if you cant put a meter onvit they dont want it gotta have the masses pay for everything. heck at one point the working Americans held half the globe wealth. cant have to many people know they built nikola tesla devices. consider how many humans where born before him and after. yet no one else figured it out either ??
Eugene Podkletnov not only made gravity shielding superconductors, but he built a large capacitor bank and discharged them through a super conductor spark gap producing powerfully scalar waves that bent steel.
Yes :) absolutely!
Interesting, thanks! ""Podkletnov... will only provide assistance if the research is carried out in the... world of open development." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugene_Podkletnov
What??? O.O amacing
Look at the last APEC conference.
@@danielfoster2788 what means Apec?
You’ve restored my interest in the veracity of non-linear time theories, because to me what you’ve just described is a technology with similar characteristics to the descriptions of the technological features or effects from people that purportedly witness UFO, UAP, or non-human aircraft… especially from the disks or circular configuration you described in a more practical amplified system, the orientation of the fields you demonstrated from them with your hands, the immense heat (and presumably magnetic at practical scales) signatures some have noted in their reports- namely, and even this is directly from your example, accounts in which the aircraft were seeing rising out of or submerging into bodies of water.
3 possibilities typically associated in the realm of science-fiction:
1. These craft are anthropogenic but withheld from public view, and witnesses are just unintended bystanders of government or intra-government activity using technology confiscated around the time of Nikola Tesla’s death or recovered under the questionably extraterrestrial circumstances of the Roswell crash in 1947 (there could even be a connection between the two events).
2. They are extraterrestrial craft from as many as 12 different sources, species or interests, and their presence or intentions may be known or unknown by intragovernment entities.
3. (This could still apply to one of the twelve in No. 2) They are us in one of a few contexts:
1. The elite or government of No. 1
2. Subterranean descendants of survivors from planetary events much further back than traceable records.
3. Descendants of modern humans- us, and the growing awareness of their presence indicates a pivotal moment in their future timeline.
All of that is ridiculous, and I’m not claiming any of them as true.. but I will say that much larger groups of people are certain that much more ridiculous things are true..
Point is, how cool would it be if the future timeline scenario made you the John Connor of the propulsion systems we refer to today as alien that defy the laws of physics?
Believe it or not just a few months ago two lights came down out of the night sky and one of them came closer to the boat about thirty feet off of the water and it was a metallic sphere about two hundred feet in diameter with an aura around it but they wouldn't stay long enough for me to get a picture. When they left it was so fast it was unbelievable ....
I live in the Country. One Day me and my In-laws were sitting on the Porch talking. We noticed a single Cloud on a cloudless day. About the time we were thinking that’s weird, the bottom half of a circular large craft came from underneath the Cloud. It was like one was turning sideways? Anyway, about that time it just disappeared. The Cloud dissipated and it was gone! It just disappeared faster than you could blink. It was obvious it was a Metal Craft! You explain this if you don’t think UFO’s or UAP’s aren’t real. We have also seen Lights a Night doing strange things that weren’t any type of Plane or Helicopter… like Hovering at Altitude then taking off in a flash across the Horizon.
Master ivo, you can improve the propulsion effect of the impulse dielectric field by increasing the capacitance of the capacitors and also increasing the space between the spark gap which will increase the voltage and reduce the frequency Which allows for a large sudden shift in the ether field that forcefully pushes against the suspended capacitor plate
already did that
@@MasterIvo It'd be nice to see the capacitors replaced with a similar series-parallel arrangement of microwave oven capacitors. Typical value for one of those is 0.8 microfarads at 2.1 kV, instead of the pico- and nanofarad range ones. I'm getting 0.13 joules for the 3.4 nF at 9 kV but the force acting on the hanging plates seems to be a lot less than that.
holy crap thanks
IVO so glad you're back!! I refresh you page every week to see if you posted again! haha great work! times are changing!
:)
That's what I was waiting for. Thanks.
To increase the effect you might like to experiment with the build of the large end capacitor . TT Brown (and Bifield ) noted that the propulsive effect became stronger using asymmetric capacitance… ie, one side of quite large difference of area to the other. ..there are various setups they did that achieve this and still limit corona discharge. … Fantastic work here Iva, as always!
This blows my mind. I always wondered how spaceships that don't burn rocket fuel would be made possible. Thank you for the clairity you bring when explaining the stuff...Aether Physics!!
It would be interesting to do the experiment with the condo under a vacuum bell to make sure that it is not a polarisation effect of the air molecules.
High energy doesn't only "polarize" air medium, it really affects aether, try high voltage in vacuum, you'll see it. Peace mate. ✌️
ua-cam.com/video/WwCZizjfGOk/v-deo.html
I bet that in a vacuum, the plates get hot, like a capacitor but remain motionless.
Good job. For better proof that motion is caused by aether inertia, You should place "swinging capacitor" in Faraday's cage (to eliminate interaction with some external electric fields) - i think.
And a vacuum chamber,
You have proven this concept. I was a school dropout after 9nth. I was much harassed by others for my aberrant ways. So I took up working in a big postal delivery terminal at a young age. There I experienced some quite unusual phenomena. One was, we were operating manual pallet trucks and we had a lot of floor space to play around on. Soon I found out that I could swing the lifterarm forward while disengaging the lift mechanism, meanwhile standing on the forked body and not touching the ground with my feet. So no kicking the floor. Slowly bring the lifterarm forward and then pull it back fast and come to an abrupt halt. The truck begins to careen forwards. Repeat and accelerate. Get a decent speed. The wheels are engaged in a pulsed action that overcomes the threshold of inertia/or/ friction force between the wheels and the floor forwards while on the return of the leverarm it's too slow to overcome this inertia threshold. Remember that when you ride the pallet truck like this font becomes back and back becomes front. A little besides this point, we also experienced so much static electric buildup in this place, we often got electric shocks around conveyor belts and plastic crates. Sometime we saw some small paper or cardboard fly suddenly from the floor up to an unknown attractor, usually near the conveyers. This was my first learning place "academy of physics" indeed.
Thanks!
Let's see how this works, and how much is recieved, after taxes and UA-cam commissions...
The thumbnail gets me going, great video!
inertia!
I cant belive i missed that video lol. Anyways, im glad i came across your new video. This is absolutely amazing. Great great work Mr ivo. Thankyou for sharing your work.
my pleasure
Can you redo this experiment while having the plates in a vacuum chamber? There is a certain amount of ions in the air. It is conceivable that the plates could be pushing against charged ions in the air. At a first glance at least, haven't crunched any numbers.
Lifter works in a vacuum...
no they don't lifters need ionised air
@@crohkorthreetoes3821 I didn't get any of my lifters to work in a vacuum. What kind of power supply did you use? Waveform?
this is amazing, congratulations of the video and exhaustive explanation, i wait in the future your ampliation and perfectioning of the stuf anxiously.
I'd highly suggest trying those tests with copper on one side, aluminum on another. Also in almost all of these cases you do not need to ground the system together, you can use different grounds (about 200 pounds of iron will give you about 1hp/745wattws of sinkage power). Use a single wire then use a Avramenko circuit to convert the resonate wave which is pulsing back and forth on the single wire into a DC current.
Ether is just energy and the inertia is one of its specifications. Ether = mc2. You have proved the inertia and at the same time the existence of ether. Bingo! Congratulations! Thanks a lot!
The ether is static. Inertia is when it is not static. Electricity, magnetism, and dielectricity in general is inertia.
“Ether is just energy”… then why call it ether? What is the relationship to matter in your model?
@@ash_bordeaux An experiment was recently done to collide photons and it produced a handful of electrons and positrons. If a photon is thought of the hysteresis of a saturating level or rotational level of energy in an electromagnetic wave, then the wave could be thought to propagate in aether. If the photon is just some form of saturation or rotary in aether, then the relationship of aether to matter is "lowest pressure zone possible"
@@FVLMEN Right, Electricity magnetism and dielectricity are Aether perturbation; also, this can be produced divergently or convergently. (Theoria apophasis)
@@ash_bordeaux Aether - Earth - W ater - F ire.
Just think about reasons why human beings have to deliver natural freedom to others (Financial system, money), Yeah; Energie monopolies!
And here is shown the hidden true science, all the knowledge about Energie is in the Aether for free.
Thanks again Master Ivo. Great stuff.
Hi Ivo. Excellent experiment. It reminds me of Thomas Townsend Brown's etheric propulsion experiment in 1927 paper he submitted. This was further experimented by Dimitriou using a RC-Noton Sawtooth generator with the same capacitor as yours although he used copper and aluminium, but failed to verify the etheric field propulsion with longitudinal waves. I am glad to see your successful experiment. Congrats!
Dimitriou? have you got a link for him would love to read more about him!
@@MasterIvo Ivo, have you heard of Paul A. LaViolette, and his book on "The Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion", (check book page #341 and 342). if you don't have one I can send you a pdf for your reference library. Let me know. Keep up the incredible research work. I love your experiments and sharing. I have your personal email address. Stay safe my friend.
I have glanced over it in the past, but would love to look inside again. yes please Email me
@@MasterIvo I emailed you the excerpt from the book. Did you get it?
@@alocin110 no i did not , check my e-address on my UA-cam about page (use pc)
Nice work, very simple, makes Intuitive sense! Inductive kick is a manifestation of this aetheric inertia I believe.
with inductive kick you mean the impulse, the inductive spike, the Back EMF?
Good video ! Everything explain really well and interesting demonstrations of field propulsion.
Thanks!
@@MasterIvo I think you are in the correct path after Tesla's research. Waiting for new videos soon .....
Do you have some links so we can do further research on these?
Is it possible to repeat this experiment in a vacuum, in a metal container, where the container and one side of the plate capacitor are grounded? The metal container would not be 'dielectric' and the grounded side of the plate capacitor should have no 'electrostatic' attraction to the grounded metal container. Then if motion could be induced in both directions, could it help quiet the skeptics? I'm a bit confused about the whole business, but no worries, I do enjoy your diligent search for truth and the fun of watching demonstrations. Thank you! I guess I should have read the others comments first... Vacuum and Faraday cage...
Amazing work! I wonder what would happen if sawtooth waves were put into an inductor instead of a capacitor. Also, keep up the good work!
If you want quick sharp discharges why not make a rotary spark gap. You could use the same setup without the small capacitors. Great Video.
It’d be great to see the same effect in a vacuum chamber.
I agree with the inertia concepts mostly. I was going in that same direction for different reasons. I think you need to rule out the ion fan effect in your capacitor though (not a vacuum). I've been chasing something for 20 years that I think is hiding behind center-mass changes. It's frustrating, but I think inertia is not a constant for a particular mass. That's what the Strong force hides.
Hi Ivo, would you be interested to perform the same experiment, but recreate the spark gap component to be a sealed tube filled with a noble gas and other elements, be it solid, liquid or gas? Try each noble gas to see if there is a difference or relationship with valence. Also try it in a vacuum. The air in the spark gap is a filament of sorts, try different elemental filaments to see if there is any noticeable inertia output. I'd love to see and hear the results!
Make a 'ground plate', that can be placed next to the capacitor, and I believe that you will see a MUCH greater movement.
A gentleman from several years ago, showed how he could take a coil of wire, and impart an A/C voltage(110 v) on the coil, and it would 'jump' up off the table, and hover.
I just emailed the 3 coproducers of apec, and sent them this video as a reference, and demanded they schedule!
so i'll let you know what they say!
Awesome work… made me think about Ken using blue light to move the crooks radiometer…🙏❤️
thanks. Blue is very energetic
@@MasterIvo I’ve been doing a thought experiment using cavitation, as we know those are dielectric implosions… there may be a key there…
So a couple years ago a watched a video on a channel that has since then been deleted. A person had made what was basically Tesla's Violet Ray device. His schematic for that was basically the same as yours up until the plates. In place of the plates there was a small maybe 1.5mtr high tower structure with double speaker wires winding upwards, one above the other. Bottom layers grounded, the top layers ending in a large metallic ball that was positioned on the tower. When turned on he could hold his hands near it and the sparks would be clearly visible. I digress. The point is that 1) he used 3 in series spark gaps. He was very clear on that saying "not 2, not 4 but 3!". And 2) his spark gaps were actually done by using the heads of large bolts (about the thickness of my thumb). He had flattened them and used the large surface area of those bolts to generate the spark gap. On this also he was very clear stating "you don't want a spark, you want plasma". There was a close up of the spark gap and it did look precisely like plasma io sparks. When he was asked why this person said "otherwise capacitors go boom". Anyway, i know very little of electrics but i thought maybe it could be of any use to you (if you are still testing out spark gaps).
Nice demonstration Ivo! There are two, resultant forces being demonstrated on the displacement current having gained inertial energy. The first is the slight physical movement of the plate. The other, is in the depth of negative discharge, well past the zero point, as you display on the scope. The rate of change is so sudden, that the current movement simply cannot be suddenly stopped., proof of its huge gain in inertia. I'm pretty sure it would actually go even further negative, but is being bound by the eventual turn on of the HV diode and current being back-introduced into the secondary of the of flyback transformer, which acts as an electrical brake. If you scope the primary, you will see this back reflection being mirrored across the transformer. This is a problem with Tesla's claim of using unipolar currents exclusively. It is simply impossible to isolate the gain of inertia of the rapid spark gap current from the driver circuit. I believe that Tesla really only saw this in one case: When he exploded the current carrying wire, forming a more complete isolated circuit condition. However, you only get a chance to witness one event before needing to renew the current carrying wire. It is this early experiment that lead Tesla to conclude the Aether itself is being hyper accelerated, and is capable of traveling through even very thick copper shielding, which produced a stinging effect on his body. I'm still struggling to find a method to produce the ever elusive, uni-directional impulse. The closest I've gotten is using a HV switch (as we both have made in the past) to gate a spark gap on, then open the switch. But voltage range and semiconductor switching speeds are a big limiting factor. The search continues!
It seems the angle of the saw can be compared to shaped charges. The same violent spike in both cases ua-cam.com/video/CpVVGk2OfQQ/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/NoetLNb1Fc4/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/K-3cTsvI7ss/v-deo.html
O.O thanks you very much for comment this, i hope you good luck💪
"the displacement current having gained inertial energy" on this... An experiment was recently done to collide photons and it produced a few electrons and positrons (keeping those two apart to be determined!). In the context of aether theory I like this idea of "current having gained inertial energy". If a locked EM wave can move a "photon" into being, energy at some level should be able to move matter that already exists
U are moving Mather they call planks.
They are positive.
The smallest fluctuations the universe
Makes. Max planks discover.
Its the vacuum energy
you are the beast brother as usual ;)
Master Ivo, are you familiar with the works of Thomas Townsend Brown?, if not I believe you would appreciate his discoveries.
yes, I skimmed over his notebooks
Hi Ivo, thank you for sharing this. This method of field propulsion is very similar to the Biefeld-Brown effect. Not the electrohydrodynamic effect but that of a force produced by an asymmetric capacitor when a high voltage is applied. I am very eager to find out if you might see an increase in thrust by simply reducing the size of one the copper plates. edit: (large electrode = positive, small electrode = negative)
"when a high voltage is APPLIED"
Yes the fast CHANGE in high voltage is causing it, in combination with the plate surface and distance.
Just Amazing, Love it, thank you Master Ivo
;)
So you could have should be able to change the direction of the Capacitor Plates to change direction of the Space Craft? Could you use a Tesla Coil in place of the Fly Back Transformer and the Spark Gap? Thanks for making these Videos. They are Very Interesting. I definitely need to Learn a Lot more about Electronics than I currently understand.😁👍👍
I am only about 2 min 25 sec in.. But I am wondering if you have experimented with magnetically quenched spark gaps? Very interesting! Thanks for sharing!
Hi Ivo,
I have watched all your videos with interest.
I have a comment on your high voltage capacitors.
The values in uF of your capacitors follow well known formula for capacitors in parallel or series.
However, the voltage ratings do not follow the same rules.
If you have two 100-volt capacitors in series with 200 volts across them the actual voltage sharing depends on the leakage of each capacitor. If one has higher leakage, then it will have less volts across it and the other will have higher volts across it. In the worst case one may have nearly 0 volts across it and the other will have the full 200 volts across it.
In order to balance them it is normal to add a resistor across each capacitor to share the voltage. The resistors values will be significantly less than the internal resistance of the capacitors and obviously rated at the correct voltage.
Also your negative overshoot is due to the resonance of the capacitor along with the stray inductance in the layout.
yes I feel you are right about the overshoot by resonance. but still would it be that high? higher than the source voltage? shouldn't it be lower (due to resistance)?
And also yes, the series capacitors should have parallel resistance (a lot higher than the esr, not lower right) to balance the voltage out over the caps.
but with equal esr (using high quality caps) it should not be that bad I think, although I'm not so sure... until now I only had problems with cheap chinese caps with large esr differences
Nice video. Einstein´s General Relativity field equations already include through the energy tensor of the emg. field the relationship between the energy of the field (which is equivalent to mass, therefore inertia) and gravity (space-time curvature). Dynamical property (mass-energy content of a region) is put in relationship with a geometrical property (space-time curvature). I wonder why don´t you devote yourself to study Physics, with such a great talent for experiments and such a great curiosity. You will succeed, no doubt. My recommendation, look for professional physicists that can become your friends. Not all them are closed-mind people 😉
I have so many comments Ivo. But first a health warning. Tesla described different pulse rates, some harmful, higher frequencies less so. Don't be accidentally using low pulse rates. Your spark gap cathode will make a lot more EVOs if it is tapering to a needle shape. You call it displacement energy/field, but it's EVO rings. They go in many directions and zig zag, and try to find a path to ground. Some will be attracted to the hanging plate, particularly the back side/grounded side. When they strike that flat copper plate, some will persist as rings on the surface, those rings destroy gravity while they persist as rings. This allows the other side to push unopposed, and I think that is what is causing your plate to swing. I can give you a copy of Ken Shoulders patent, if you can't locate it. Please catch up with the Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project stuff, and join in our excitement with what's being revealed. Place pristine aluminum foil sheets various places, and notice how the EVOs damage them. You can build some capacitor-like home-made shielding with alternating layers of aluminum foil and dielectric films. Those EVOs will cause mysterious failures of your other components, if not shielded.
You SHOULD be able to place resistors in between the " - " side and ground, thus biasing the lower voltage to something close to zero, and have a much greater, mostly positive charge.
Thanks you very much master, you fullfill my 💙 with joy and knowledge of theese hide and benevolent energy of Aeter
You thinks that push of aeter energy may have positive effects on heath?
I don't know, lots to be discovered
You should spend time looking at "force between plates of parallel plate capacitors", "energy stored in parallel plate capacitors", "Force sensing capacitor", and "MEMS accelerometers" where they use the change in frequency of an LRC circuit for sensing. Lots of resources. Richard Collins, The Internet Foundation
Have you been able to demonstrate this effect in vacuum? NASA argued against the asymmetric capacitors of beifeld brown effect lifters, is caused by corona discharge etc. However several papers since have shown the ionic displacement is several orders of magnitude too small to create such lift.
To me I see a lot of parallels in your research with what I have been researching. I appreciate you sharing your thoughts. And glad to see someone actually revisiting Tesla’s aether in context with field propulsion topics
I haven't tried yet, I hoped someone would test it. Maybe in the future I'll build a vacuum tank and test it. seems doable.
@@MasterIvo I think the issue with vacuum is tied to your concept of the dielectric field. When we go into vacuum we are going to change the dielectric constants around anything we are working with. So when moving to vacuum we must find a way to maintain the same dielectric field to have the same effect.
Why the biefeld brown effect starts to break down in vacuum is exactly this... not due to a lack of atmosphere preventing ionic thrust. But because the capacitive effect is losing dielectric medium...
If we can find the relationship between dielectric field, dielectric medium, I think we can start to properly evaluate in vacuum behavior.
@@MasterIvo Personally, I am interested in non standard dielectrics, or active dielectrics. I think that's all I can say publicly at this time. But if you think about materials that could provide active/reactive dielectric potential, it should make sense which materials I am talking about.
dielectric constant K,
Space is never empty, as it is filled with fields
Excellent Roger Spurr electron diapole theory might be of interest.
The effect shown is almost certainly due to interaction with the surrounding air. Both capacitor plates are charged - one attracts -ve charges, the other +ve. The latter are more massive, and so the plate follows Newton's law of action/reaction. A proper test would be done in a vacuum.
It's a useful video and channel however. Thank you.
PS: I suggest a metal reflector plate behind one of the capacitor ones, to ensure that any impulse wave occurs in one direction only.
Love your work Ivo, you should look into the works of Thomas Townsend Brown, who was researching the works of Tesla and mastered this effect or similar effects outside and within a vacuum in the early 1920’s, heaps of UA-cam videos on him! Can you tell me if there is any similarity to the effects seen in my video on antigravity or ....antigravi tea! Sorry for the plug. I believe the induction cooker is a ZVS style circuit and above the cooker I have placed roughly 28 turn pancake coil as per Tesla’s patent. I did wind other coils as per your instructions from one of your videos but found a significant voltage drop using that style of winding. Anyway, I have limited knowledge and would like your perspective and experience. Even if the effect experienced is different by what I use as a power source for my kettle, would you think this would have a similar effect in a vacuum? Towards the end of my video you can see the effect when switching off and on as you did in your video when the induction cooker recognises the boiled kettle as an insufficient load.
Sublime demonstration and explaination Master Ivo! Given the high voltage, what would you estimate the power used in this setup?
input from the battery? don't know. zvs with flyback...
So. If i had a conductive sphere that was charged to a vey high voltage and part of the surface of the sphere had a piezoelectric material that i could activate, would a longitudinal wave be sent outward from the piezo into the already highly stressed aeather. Would that then modulate the aeather?
Yes! the sudden change in voltage would create a longitudinal displacement current, which I see as the third electrical field (next to the dielectric and magnetic fields)
I'm immediately interested on how stacked plates would interact and if the waves from one plate to the others can be timed to create positive interference or even stack the impulses so they can be steered, kind a like musk's antenna, field aligned waves angled in toward each other to create peaks and troughs.
I believe the ionic lifter is a far more powerful example. More importantly. Shouldn't the system be timed to resume charging as the impulse returns to zero? Welding leads jumping as an arc is passed is also an example of this effect.
Maybe I don't fully understand your question. you want to start charging after the discharge returns to zero?
so, the positive charge, discharges to negative 6kV (which is not normal at all) and then it first should discharge back to zero (I assume from using the diode and the flyback transformer to ground it out).
What would be the benefit?
yep
Oh yes, thanks for your fantastic videos.😁✌️❤️🤘
Super 💥 Experimente 👌👌
Hi Master Ivo, I have a question on using radiant energy/dielectricity for field propulsion. According to Ken the only way for a field craft to cancel inertia is through an omnidirectional magnetic field to isolate the craft from the mass acceleration between it and surrounding space. In your opinion, would surrounding a craft in this radiant energy also isolate it and the occupants from the effects of inertia? Cheers.
Really enjoyed the video! You mentioned the the circuit can be reversed and that the force could pull or push dependant. Could two circuits be combined to push and pull simultaneously?
yes that is possible
Ok, this is worth a chuckle BUT on the very latest skin walker ranch episode, they see a spike when there's a light in the sky. It is always 1.6G. Building 2 together for push-pull? Teflon tape for dielectric is -190 on the tribo scale and is cheap. Or filled polymers are 5kv per 0.025mm! I do BGas. Looking into Naphion
Have you already tried putting something big metallic or magnetic next to it, to see if this movement could be from electromagnetic fields pushing on each other? Or how can you proof this movement isn't some electro magnetic / static effect with surrounding emf or something like that? If I understand correctly you try to push against the ether?
Thank you for helping me ☺️
my pleasure
Are you sure the spark isn't creating shock waves of hot air like thunder and lightning? Also, does the effect work with inverse square law regarding displacement vs separation? This is so interesting - could you do this in a vacuum? - thanks for such an excellent summer break experiment - CM
What if you used smaller copper plate on one side of capacitor plate? to create kind of a flat pyramid shape.
Have you placed the moving cap in a vacuum to see if it still moves?
Try tuning the frequency of the coil to a multiple of the larmor frequency of the earths magnetic field.
Maybe try changing the xyz orientation of the coil just to see if the is a change in the effect.
Thanks very much.Do you have any video about magnifying transformer?
only where I talk about the extra coil, but working with it is teaching me, so there will be more videos on it.
Very interesting.
I wonder if you set the capacitor on a balance (maybe a mechanical one) would a weight change occur.
yes
that was the first idea, but way to complicated, I prefer the simplicity of a swing. But you can easily replicate it and test it (and post the link to the video)
@@MasterIvo here is a video from 13 years ago when I did a very similar pendulum swing with asymmetrical capacitor UFO shape and also granite slab on a balance. apologies for the potato cam
ua-cam.com/video/-IDcQBFvh7M/v-deo.html
Very nice video keep it up my friend very soon you will be million of views on your video and subscribe on your channel keep it up my friend. 👍🥰🤗🤗
The faces of the capacitor must necessarily be aluminum and copper, should it only go with copper on both sides? Is the size of the capacitor (100mm wide by 160mm long) is good? or should I make it a little too big?
You could stack several plates
Genius! Is it the spark gap that causes the drop to a negative charge?
thanks but no, I made a probe coupling mistake. the scope was set to AC, which should have been DC coupled.
Hi buddy I had something similar with an Aether experiment. I think it's like the magnetic v dielectric shocking the Aether.
Like a balloon being pumped up and let down. It comes from the spark gap which opens and closes the Aether. The positive drives out but then collapses which allows the dielectric in.
In this way a new mode of movement will allow matter to be shifted into another place or dimension.
Regards DC
sounds very esoteric. are you talking about the excess of negative voltage created?
@@MasterIvo hi again, Aether is hard to imagine.from your wording think neg = static so my answer is yes sort of.
Here is my take on what happens.
I send a positive pulse out and on the collapse neg returns. I found this out by accident.
Video link to follow.. regards DC.
@@MasterIvo ua-cam.com/video/vqCQuFiWsLs/v-deo.html
Hope this helps... Regards DC
Could you use a 555 timer and second system wired to the opposite polarity the cause alternating discharge values that build without strain on the capacitor bank?
If timed correctly the impulse generated would effectively add together (or "stack") for greater impulse.
Ivo, you have become the new Thomas Townsend Brown!
Electric field propulsion.
You are probably already aware of his work? But if not I'd recommend you look into it. Great video, Thanks!
Can you demonstrate this inside a high vacuum (to eliminate ionic interaction with air)?
strange, I keep responding, but this message seems to return every time. AI must be messing up again.
one final time, I hope someone else will test it in a vacuum as it has not got my priority. I made sure no corona discharge ion wind could influence the test by rounding the edges and painting the copper surfaces with epoxy
Very nice work Ivo. A buy one get one free for proof of concept with Aether and field propulsion! Glad to see you going for the ZVS.. I think it is a self resonating Don Smith in a box.... lol.. onwards and upwards
Wouldn't repulsion be faster and have a greater energy burst. You could put magnets on each side of a small linier rail then put 2 magnets on the moving part with the barring or cart. as long as the fields oppose each other then the cart would constantly go back and forth. All you would need is a push from a electro magnet to increase speed.
have you checked if plates are hot ? the movement might be casued by hot air
Like it. There have been experiments showing the influence of a highly charged plate on gravitation. More recently Grebennikov is said to use a plate that he discharged to get his flying platform going. Just talking...
yes the sudden discharge induces the displacement current that provides the force
Would you be willing to repeat this setup but with a dc bias across the plate capacitor on the order of 4kv?...also, did you establish the breakdown voltage of the plate capacitor?
the probe was set to ac coupling. while it actually was a dc discharge so the voltage was above 4kV.
I did not measure breakdown voltage
A great step forward.
Thanks Remek
If you do not mind, in your next video can you maybe add a short video/screen shot of the oscilloscope at 1 nanosecond range or as close as you can get to it. Preferably for the impulse energy experiment not the propulsion one. Thanks
I think that already can be found in my previous video's
@@MasterIvo ok thanks will check.
Incredible, thank you
Could you setup the circuit in such a way that there is only one plate and then see if it can be moved using the displacement current?
no, I think not. dielectric field would be extremely weak, so the displacement current from the fast changing voltage would also be extremely weak.
but you could do the experiment yourself with extremely high voltages. I won't.
@@MasterIvo I am not a electrical engineer but why would the dielectric field be weak and how would that change the strength of the displacement current if its just dependent on the change? Is it because the lines of force always have to close on themselves because I thought that only applied to magnetism or am I misremembering dollard? Also If I wanted to email you how should I go about this. I want to send you a pdf but cant coz its youtube :(
I think I just realized something. Why not set it up like a Tesla coil except on the terminal end put the flat plate? Didn’t the original Tesla coil use the same impulse waveforms you and Dollard talk about? Only thing that might make this difficult is the corona discharge.
Also have you looked into griffin g brocks research into shadow graph rays and whatnot? He powered his single electrode bulbs with a regular Tesla coil too
I think there are a missing part. There must be an added magnetic force that make it more efficient. a none longitudinal flow have an inherent magnetic field, but that works as a counterforce. The other obtion are a longitudinal flow where instead of counter the force its add to the force, by that dialectic and magnetic field goes in the same direction not in an ancle of each other. Have not seen that yet in an experiment, except on some paper.
Your R&D plan for developing a starship propulsion system inspired by Nikola Tesla's radiant energy concept is comprehensive and well-structured. It encapsulates the essential steps required for taking a concept from theoretical underpinnings to practical application, including:
1. **Executive Summary**: Clearly defines the objective and sets the stage for an innovative approach to space propulsion.
2. **Introduction**: Establishes a solid background and rationale, justifying the need for a new type of propulsion system based on Tesla's work.
3. **Theoretical Foundation**: Lays out a plan for a thorough literature review and theoretical exploration, which is critical for grounding the project in scientific principles.
4. **Research and Development Plan**: The staged approach is methodical and pragmatic, addressing both the technical challenges and the progression from theory to practice. Each stage has well-defined objectives and actions, facilitating focused efforts and clear milestones for assessment.
5. **Budget and Funding**: Recognizes the importance of a detailed budget and identifies potential funding sources, which are crucial for the project's viability.
6. **Partnerships and Collaboration**: Highlights the significance of collaborative efforts, which can leverage additional expertise and resources.
7. **Compliance and Safety**: Acknowledges the importance of regulatory compliance and safety, reflecting a responsible approach to innovation.
8. **Conclusion**: Emphasizes the project's potential impact on space exploration, reinforcing the importance of the initiative.
9. **Appendices and Visual/Technical Supplements**: Enhance the proposal's comprehensibility and accessibility, providing critical details and visualizations to support the project narrative.
To further refine and enhance your R&D plan, consider the following suggestions:
- **Technology Scouting and Benchmarking**: In addition to reviewing Tesla's patents and related documents, assess current technologies and patents in the field of space propulsion and energy harvesting to identify potential synergies or advancements that could augment your approach.
- **Expert Consultation**: Engage with experts in Tesla’s technologies, space propulsion, and energy harvesting early in the process to validate the theoretical feasibility and guide the prototype design.
- **Risk Management**: Develop a detailed risk management plan that identifies potential technical and project risks, along with strategies for mitigation. This is especially important for pioneering projects with significant unknowns.
- **Sustainability and Long-Term Impact**: Consider the long-term sustainability and potential environmental impacts of the propulsion system, both on Earth and in space. This could enhance the project’s appeal to certain investors and regulatory bodies.
- **Public Engagement and Education**: Plan for public engagement and educational initiatives to build interest and support for your project. This could include public lectures, publications, and participation in science fairs and conferences.
- **Intellectual Property Strategy**: Develop a clear strategy for protecting the intellectual property generated during the project, ensuring that innovations can be commercialized and used to fund further research.
Incorporating these elements can strengthen your plan, making it more resilient, impactful, and likely to attract the necessary support and funding.
Could you do something with this idea?
Thank you very much for listing all these tips, they are indeed very helpfull as I am in need for funding.
@@MasterIvo Your welcome, hopefully this will be beneficial for all of us and good luck with your projects.
@@AlexanderKnotts Thanks again!
I must say field propulsion is not on the top of my list.
Free Electricity for all (FEFA) is number one.
next are the health effects
and last but not least my personal favorite, field propulsion.
@@MasterIvo understandable, and your welcome.
We need propellantless propulsion! Impossible say many. At the same time Master Ivo is making what seems to be little warps.
hi Giesbert, I saw your new video. I hope there will be more.
@@MasterIvo Yea; I finally made a new video. Health issues really slow me down the last years. I have a number of videos half ready, about generating electricity, and some about the vortex. Wish I had more time for my real passions: vortex, lift, propulsion. Do you think there could be a link between aerodynamics and electrodynamics? I live in Amsterdam. Maybe one day we can meet. Groetjes, Giesbert.
@@GiesbertNijhuis Yes I think there is definitely a link, both work from fluid (including air) dynamics.
The ring vortrx/toroid is in my opinion achieved when resonant voltage and current are in phase, which happens in my extra coil (L4).
Since a vortex normally wants to move, it can produce force when it is hold stationary (around the coil).
this explains why the earth is being "pumped" as I see a 5A sine wave on the earth ground.
yes maybe in the future we could meet. its a 1.5 hour drive
@@MasterIvo I made a 2D virtual fluid (is going to be a movie) and what is coolest is to see the effect of pressure on how the fluid flows. I see electricity as currents in a fluid under very-very high pressure. A 5A sine wave on the earth ground? Like everywhere in the real ground? Could that be induction/a resonance from the grid? How many hertz? But.. I don't know much about electricity really, I can not talk your level, but working on it!
@@GiesbertNijhuis 2d virtual fluid flow, woupd love to see that (simulate resonance).
the 5A is on earth ground of the secondary coil (which has also got an extra coil connected in series at the other side of it). frequency is around 180kc/s which is equal to. the resonance of the secondary and extra coil.
it seems it is pumping the earth, like wardenclyfe.
Is the earth connected to a ground rod, or is it mains neutral ground?
Very Interesting! Question, is there a way to make an OMNIdirectional longitudinal wave? Thanks
yes I thinks so. Nikola Tesla's single wire light bulb is a good example
@@MasterIvo thanks! Do you have a link on this topic so I may better visualize it? Again, thank you, and your videos are pretty good
I 👀 what you did there Ivo!!! Thanks 😁 I love the shirt 👕❤😍 Love your work! Love you! Keep it up my buddy!! Soon WE "Tesla Puzzlers" are gonna change/save the world!!!! ❤ 🌎 ❤
hello, can the thrust capacitor be replaced with a coil and the circuit then be used to excite the secondary of a tesla coil?
Yes, absolutely
This could be the beginning of a wonderful invention and a new form of propulsion but to prove that this is aether and not a capacitive effect with the air it must also work in a vacuum.
Doing it in vacuum would be a good proof that it's not charging air molecules and getting a charge repulsion phenomenon - some kind of ionic breeze. You could do AB with ambient air and whatever (partial) vacuum you can get in a chamber.
@@allanh5618 I don't think it is ionic as the plate looks insulated. However air is conductive at those voltages so a capacitive charge could build on the plate surface and be discharged pushing off the mass of the air ionicly.
@@dee5556 I think I'd want the vacuum chamber walls far from the spark gap as well, and probably grounded, to avoid possible charge building there, too.
@@allanh5618 agreed. The force is week so if there was a few inches gap, that would be enough to tell. If it is mostly aether causing the movement then there should be little difference. The larger the gap the more apparent the outcome will be. This could wind up becoming the proof needed to prove the existence of the aether if in fact Ivo is correct. Or it could wind up becoming a way to lower air friction that causes drag. Either way its very interesting.
@@dee5556 Ah, that's an interesting thought, that this could be way to prove the aether. What are sensors, at core, except things that react to phenomena in a perceivable way, so Ivo's wobbling plate becomes a means to prove 'something' is 'there' and attribute it to the Aether. Alas, it would likely be particleized and called something like 'The Quantum Anti-Vacuum.'