I think that the reason concavenator wasn't featured in Jurassic Park, was because it wasn't discovered until 2010. Because of it not yet being identified, Hammond and Lockwood chose not to feature it, or maybe because they thought it wasn't a real dinosaur.
Something to consider is Concavenator wasn't even formally classified until 2010. So if anyone cloned it before then or even more so, cloned it before 1993 when Carcharodontosaurids became far more well studied with the uncovering of Giganotosaurus and rediscovered of the until-then-lost Carcharodontosaurus, there's good cause to assume Lockwood and Hammond hadn't the slightest idea what they were looking at. A weird shaped, vaguely Carnosaur-like predator with a weird double humped sail on its back? Might have been written off as a mutation and pushed to the by-line without anyone realizing it was a legit genus.
I'm not gonna lie, and I know it might not be possible, but I would love for a Jurassic Park prequel of Hammond and Lockwood coming together and making the first dinosaurs. Maybe that would be the perfect time to show the Concavenator and the Dimetrodon?
@@christopherdinoguy8346 I guess the dinosaurs are made up creations....bits of hybrids anyway. Bit of tinkering and bam! A creature that looks like a dimetrodon.
I think, the Concavenator wasn't on InGens list and was not featured in the original Jurassic Park, because 1993 nobody known this animal. The Concavenator was discovered and discribed 2010 for the first time. Hammond and Lockwood didnt know anything about the creature, they created. So it could be, that this medium sized Theropod caused a bit of trouble and got killed by Hammonds hunter assistent Muldoon. Lockwood stuffed it then for his own collection.
My thought as well. Which just brings up the question...if that is the case, how many other unknown dinosaurs were revived and what happened to them? Raises interesting questions. Even in a movie universe, there is NO WAY that InGen only cloned known dinosaurs by recovering random DNA.
I was about to comment that as well. But how could they find Concavenator DNA without realizing it's a new species of dinosaur? If they did, they would have made it public, wouldn't they? Furthermore, what were they looking for before stumbling upon it? Concavenator inhabited what is now Spain, and I remember no other dinos in the InGen list that were found there (the closest one is Allosaurus, with fossils being found in Portugal, but not in Spain as far as I know). The only explanation I can find is that, in the film's canon, there would be Concavenator DNA in other parts of the world, where they were found together with the desired species' DNA. EDIT: Okay, nevermind, just found out Baryonyx/Suchomimus remains were found in Spain, both of which are in InGen's list, so they could have accidentally stumbled upon Concavenator DNA while looking for those.
That's interesting theory, actually. If that was a real animal and not a statue, that means they discovered a dinosaur unknown to science at the time, didn't tell anyone for likely secrecy reasons, and cloned a creature when they had no real idea what it was. That's risky in so many ways. Might be why it wasn't in the park if they actually did make one. How can you properly display an animal when you don't know what it is?
@@mrizqyabd1071 True, and I'm pretty sure there are other dinos this applies to as well. However, while I think there were no other dinos from the list found in the exact same formation Sinoceratops was found in, there were Chinese dinos in the list: Mamenchisaurus and, arguably, Velociraptor and Tyrannosaurus. Plus, I think Sinoceratops could have been cloned by Masrani, similarly to other dinos such as Corythosaurus and Spinosaurus, while the stuffed animals in Lockwood Manor point towards Concavenator having been cloned at the time of John Hammond and Benjamin.
Personally, I like the idea of these dinosaurs like the Concavenator and Mononykus being "scrapped" since these dinosaurs weren't known to since before 1993, and were likely thought to be mutations of other species. As for the Dimetrodon, I think it was sfrapped due to the animal being a permian creature. All of the animals in the film canon have been from the Mesozoic, so a Permian animal would just be out of place. As for the others, they were just earlier versions of animals we would either see later, or would be replaced by a more famous relative.
Just like in Jurassic Park: Operation Genesis or Jurassic World: Evolution? Dinosaurs with 50% complete genome sequence will not live as long as the ones with a perfect 100% sequence. (Still waiting that Concavenator, Mononykus, and Dimetrodon will make it into JW:E as future DLC)
I always thought they were taxidermy. It never even crossed my mind that they were statues. The reason is I was a very frequent visitor of the Museum of Natural History as a child (I first got my love for dinosaurs there during my first visit in 1988 as a small child several years before the first movie came out). The dinosaur bones were my favorite part of the museum, but a close second was the taxidermy setups of other extinct animals. I remember during a later visit in 1995 on a class trip I took several photos of the Moa. The bird just fascinated me. So when I saw what Lockwood had I instantly thought of the Museum of Natural History. It’s really that similar to how their taxidermy areas looked at least back then so it’s pretty cool that the magazine sees the similarities too. I think the types of dinosaurs in the museum that we never saw alive with our own eyes were ones that Hammond and Lockwood cloned early on. Since they were kinda test runs they may have died of illness quickly. The scientists may have not gotten it all just right yet. Maybe some of the breeds they were unable to clone ones that didn’t have health issues so they had to move on to other breeds. Maybe some of the breeds were extra hard or extra costly to care for so they thought it wasn’t worth it to continue to clone them for the park. Even though it is likely expensive to care for the T Rex, they knew it would be a popular animal so the return on investment made sense. It may have not made sense from a business stand point to keep breeding some of the others. I guess lots of things could have happened. Now that Mills and Lockwood are both gone, I’m guessing Dr. Wu doesn’t technically have a boss?! And I know the reason he didn’t want the indoraptor sold was because he was afraid others could replicate his work. It will be interesting to see what he does in the next film. He could become kind of a black market dinosaur creator / seller and maybe there are clients who will demand one of these particular dinosaurs so I guess there is always still a chance we could see one alive.
I know. I really will cry if we don’t have a live one in the next film. We have already waited 25 years since seeing the first Dilo. It will be 28 years by the time the film comes out. Maybe in The Lost World and JP 3 they didn’t know how many fans loved the Dilo. But thanks to social media, they know now.
the concavenator in there was especially interesting to me since, waaay back in the earliest leaks for Fallen Kingdom, a pic got out (back when Jurassic Park Legacy was still up) which some fans interpreted as being a concavenator with the guess that they'd appear live on-screen
I didn't realize they were stuffed. That's pretty grim, especially since Lockwood is a dinosaur enthusiast and they don't really appear ot be older specimens that died of natural causes. Thanks for the video. Out of everything in the museum, the concavenator always caught my eye.
So Dimetrodon is semi-canon, that's all I needed to hear Edit: I wonder if the feathers on the Mononykus are perhaps a nod to the outdated idea that they are actually early flightless birds instead of non-avian dinosaurs. While this is very unlikely in our reality, it could be real in the JP universe (similar to how Deinonychus is a species of Velociraptor in that universe). If so, that would mean that Mononykus is the most bird-like extinct animal Ingen has cloned, which may have allowed its genome to partially "circumvent" the null-allele that inhibits feather-growth in all the other dinosaurs.
Callen Fields By literally only one researcher, Gregory S. Paul, who was already criticized for it back then. He just happened to have a huge influence on Crichton
I was also bothered. One of the great things about the original Jurassic Park film was the incredible amount of original paleoart they commissioned for preliminary concepts, props and movie backgrounds (Crash McCreery's sketches, Doug Henderson's mural). Since the reboot, there has been a lot of cut & pasting pre-existing artworks, in some cases without the artist's permission (eg. the uproar over plagiarised images used for the JW holoscape). This crap never happened under Stan Winston's watch.
It makes sense to me that they would be Taxidermied animals. 'Extras' in the cloning procedure that may have died or Lockwood could have killed to fill his museum. His Taxidermist would have had to have been very reliable not to blab to others. :-)
Love to see the Concavenator but it looks like a juvie to me, also I like the idea that they are stuffed but I would love to explore more of that area in the manor especially all the skeletons there as well as love to see more and new dinos added to the series and games
I could definitely see those statues being prototype dinosaurs until the dinosaurs chosen to be displayed in the original park were finalized. Although, it would be interesting seeing some of them making an appearance in a future Jurassic Park story, especially the Concavenator, Dimetrodon, and Dracorex.
That’s crazy to believe that these clones are actually stuffed!I initially believed that these were how the clones looked in the wild,but as it turns out,they are
*Concavenator breaks out* Mr. Arnold shouts 'Enough is enough. I've had it with these mother effin dinos on this mother effin island. He's too dangerous to be left alive!' *Activates lightsaber, notices oops wrong franchise, sits down again*
i never thought they would be stuffed animals if that is true or not but i love that i didnt even think of that when i first saw the movie great work Klayton
I always wanted to see a Concavenator in Jurassic World evolution... Now I want it even more and to look exacly like this, with colourfull skins and unique animations in addition !!!
As much as I'd like this to be true I have I believe the same issue or another magazine I got which has a picture of clearly an Apatosaurus listed as the nostalgic Brachiosaurus so it's hard for me to believe a magazine they probably just meant statues but said they were stuffed believe me it's one of many mistakes these film magazines make.
i have a theory; maybe benjamin lockwood has own private dinosaur park (not big as jurassic park, little zoo) and he cloned different species and when an animal dies he took it to his taxidermy collection
I think there well done models of those dinosaurs because I figured that some artists look at these dinosaurs and decided to make these really well done version of these things
I think it makes sense if they were early prototypes that didn't live long and could've got either scrapped or they planned to try them again at a later date
I would really, really, really want to see monoykus in a film. Just a cool dinosaur, very unique looking. Love alverasaurids. And I guess it makes sense for them to not have feathers if they're older clones
I remember a video you made in which you talked about a Smilodon plush seen in the first movie. I think it’ll have been awesome if we had seen one in the Lockwood manor in stuffed form on display.
The spinosaurus was actually planned for Fallen Kingdom, but later replaced by the carnotaurus, although, me personally I think its best that it wasn't because it was going to be killed a some flaming rocks from the volcano.
When E Weekly did a article on X-Men the Last Stand they mention the character Quill as Kid Omega. Also mentioning a few plot points that didn't happen in the movie. So take their words with a grain of salt.
Well, just like before, each had different characteristic on them, meaning that we could say they existed, but other observations can lead from one mystery to another, just like at the end o this video, there may be something much deeper that we yet have to discover. These videos are very analyzed from beginning to end, and each time you bring one topic, it leads to one clue. Arigato.
Unless there is new info as I'm quite late to this video, totally missed it, it's curious that Mattel has released a Concavinator with one of the new ranges for JW. It came into work on delivery and really threw me as to why it had been added but wasn't in the series.
Them being taxidermy is a far more interesting detail to have in the story than them being statues, so therefore until explicitly stated otherwise, that is what I'm going to go with.
I was of the mind that they were just wax statues. I'm sure Lockwood had his favorites and I'm sure he probably just filled his own gallery with his portrayal of them.
I personally think it might be true. An only creature of those from the dioramas we actually saw in films as a living animal with almost no difference in appearence is a Velociraptor. And the Velociraptor was the first succesfully cloned animal ready to be displayed in Jurassic Park. The others possess many features that may lead us to consider them as prototype assets. A Dilophosaurus is the second well known creature, but it looked a bit different in it's final version. Especially its frill resembles a frilled dragon more then ever. Now focus on the Dimetrodon - it posses many details identical to crocodiles. Its teeth and overall shape of the jaws. Osteoderms on its back and much more sturdier body than the real life counterpart possessed. Mononykus resembles a long necked skinny chicken with tail. That may have some connection to the null allele problem that disabled InGen clones to be covered by any type of feathers. Those sparse quills may be everything that left. Other 3 species do not possess so bright hints, but even so we can find an explanation why they were not listed in the InGen list. Diplodocus siblings could die in their very young youth. Even in the wild nature the most of animals die in first days, weeks or months. When we consider the fact that these were unnaturally bred genetical experiments, the chance of dying soon is even higher. A Dracorex is carrying an egg in its beak and it looks like it is trying to escape with that egg from group of other dinos like a thief - quite strange behavior for a herbivorous pachycephalosaurid, isn't it? That may be a reference to its strange, agressive behavior when bred, again caused by errors i its genome. And as Dylan Horvath wrote - no one knew a Concavenator in seventies and early eighties when John and Benjamin started their experiments, so they might consider that specimen as the another error caused by wrong gene splicing... Those are just my personal opinions. Since I saw this video I had never thought that these creatures were anything more than just statues. But when you think a little bit about this other option of their purpous, it doesn't look so unlikely...
Pin me
no i will be pinned !
"Dr. Roa? Pin Kirby! Pin Enterprises!"
@@mohamedzohir5820 Sorry. He Pinned Diego
mohamed zohir rip
Diego Roa donrm
I think that the reason concavenator wasn't featured in Jurassic Park, was because it wasn't discovered until 2010. Because of it not yet being identified, Hammond and Lockwood chose not to feature it, or maybe because they thought it wasn't a real dinosaur.
Like they thought they had gotten a "genetic mutation" and decided to euthanize it or something. Lol that would be cool.
:(
Im sad
It's sad
That could be a really cool concept for a movie. They find dinosaur dna in amber that is unknown, and it’s some deadly predator
Something to consider is Concavenator wasn't even formally classified until 2010. So if anyone cloned it before then or even more so, cloned it before 1993 when Carcharodontosaurids became far more well studied with the uncovering of Giganotosaurus and rediscovered of the until-then-lost Carcharodontosaurus, there's good cause to assume Lockwood and Hammond hadn't the slightest idea what they were looking at. A weird shaped, vaguely Carnosaur-like predator with a weird double humped sail on its back? Might have been written off as a mutation and pushed to the by-line without anyone realizing it was a legit genus.
Same with Mononykus
Tarbtano I guess this explains why it wasn’t on InGen’s list.
Wait is it a real dinosaur?
Wolfy Plays yes.
When was it discovered I never heard of it
I'm not gonna lie, and I know it might not be possible, but I would love for a Jurassic Park prequel of Hammond and Lockwood coming together and making the first dinosaurs. Maybe that would be the perfect time to show the Concavenator and the Dimetrodon?
I would LOVE this!
This would actually probably be way better than the current direction the series is going.
How would they make a thrilling story out of that? Unless there is a disaster early on, everything looked to be fine up to the first film.
If they use DNA from mosquitoes then how can they get dimetrodon DNA when mosquitoes didn't exist in the Permian period?
@@christopherdinoguy8346 I guess the dinosaurs are made up creations....bits of hybrids anyway. Bit of tinkering and bam! A creature that looks like a dimetrodon.
Yes! I'm glad you finally talked about the taxidermied dinos, it's been an interesting point in the fanbase.
Indeed, I want to see some if them in action in the third film
Raptorus77 AYYY I SAQ YOU ON THEGAMINGBEAVER I THINK :D
2015 2018 2023
@@endermanwithalowercaseewell we never got it
I think, the Concavenator wasn't on InGens list and was not featured in the original Jurassic Park, because 1993 nobody known this animal. The Concavenator was discovered and discribed 2010 for the first time. Hammond and Lockwood didnt know anything about the creature, they created. So it could be, that this medium sized Theropod caused a bit of trouble and got killed by Hammonds hunter assistent Muldoon. Lockwood stuffed it then for his own collection.
My thought as well. Which just brings up the question...if that is the case, how many other unknown dinosaurs were revived and what happened to them? Raises interesting questions. Even in a movie universe, there is NO WAY that InGen only cloned known dinosaurs by recovering random DNA.
I was about to comment that as well. But how could they find Concavenator DNA without realizing it's a new species of dinosaur? If they did, they would have made it public, wouldn't they?
Furthermore, what were they looking for before stumbling upon it? Concavenator inhabited what is now Spain, and I remember no other dinos in the InGen list that were found there (the closest one is Allosaurus, with fossils being found in Portugal, but not in Spain as far as I know). The only explanation I can find is that, in the film's canon, there would be Concavenator DNA in other parts of the world, where they were found together with the desired species' DNA.
EDIT: Okay, nevermind, just found out Baryonyx/Suchomimus remains were found in Spain, both of which are in InGen's list, so they could have accidentally stumbled upon Concavenator DNA while looking for those.
That's interesting theory, actually. If that was a real animal and not a statue, that means they discovered a dinosaur unknown to science at the time, didn't tell anyone for likely secrecy reasons, and cloned a creature when they had no real idea what it was. That's risky in so many ways. Might be why it wasn't in the park if they actually did make one. How can you properly display an animal when you don't know what it is?
But the sinoceratops also were discovered in 2010 and it populated the island prior to eruption
@@mrizqyabd1071 True, and I'm pretty sure there are other dinos this applies to as well. However, while I think there were no other dinos from the list found in the exact same formation Sinoceratops was found in, there were Chinese dinos in the list: Mamenchisaurus and, arguably, Velociraptor and Tyrannosaurus. Plus, I think Sinoceratops could have been cloned by Masrani, similarly to other dinos such as Corythosaurus and Spinosaurus, while the stuffed animals in Lockwood Manor point towards Concavenator having been cloned at the time of John Hammond and Benjamin.
The Lockwood Museum is Amazing! I wish I could visit it. It looks so cool.
Bryce Mckenzie It should become an attraction in one of the Universal Studios parks, with an animatronic Indoraptor in it’s cage at the end
Bryce Mckenzie Me too lol. I would love to own a museum like that
Man Lockwood's collection is so cool, I wish to have my own collection of fossil skeletons and maybe taxidermy speciemens.
Could be a line waiting room
Then, in the next room you will see the Mighty Indoraptor that got killed by a Triceratops Skull.
I'm surprised there was no Therizinosaurus specimens at the Lockwood museum
*whistle* could you imagine seeing that in a movie
that's one species I MUST see in this franchise, i'll even take evolution for it
CrystalWing 2149 yeah me to
Sasuke Uchiha i need a therizenosauras in jp
there should be one tho
Personally, I like the idea of these dinosaurs like the Concavenator and Mononykus being "scrapped" since these dinosaurs weren't known to since before 1993, and were likely thought to be mutations of other species. As for the Dimetrodon, I think it was sfrapped due to the animal being a permian creature. All of the animals in the film canon have been from the Mesozoic, so a Permian animal would just be out of place. As for the others, they were just earlier versions of animals we would either see later, or would be replaced by a more famous relative.
When I saw the concavenator in the Lockwood manor I got really suspicious...
WAIT! What if lockwood cloned Mr T-Rex-Killer?
Dude same
@@rebel6301 YAS SISTERS
@@brodoodtv8343 yo dont call me that
@@rebel6301 I didn’t I was just saying that because I love spino now that I think about it that weird
I kinda wanna see the Concavenator.
Meee toooo
Me too
Ikr I have it in JW the game and it looks so cool
I didn't make much about the baby Diplodocus until I found out they're taxidermied. That's... kind of sad.
Hopefully we can see some of them in the next one.
If these were early cloned dinosaurs, it’s possible they died to complications while working out the kinks.
They probably lost a lot of animals in the early days. Kind of have to learn on the fly when dealing with animals no human has ever seen in the flesh.
Just like in Jurassic Park: Operation Genesis or Jurassic World: Evolution? Dinosaurs with 50% complete genome sequence will not live as long as the ones with a perfect 100% sequence.
(Still waiting that Concavenator, Mononykus, and Dimetrodon will make it into JW:E as future DLC)
I always thought they were taxidermy. It never even crossed my mind that they were statues. The reason is I was a very frequent visitor of the Museum of Natural History as a child (I first got my love for dinosaurs there during my first visit in 1988 as a small child several years before the first movie came out). The dinosaur bones were my favorite part of the museum, but a close second was the taxidermy setups of other extinct animals. I remember during a later visit in 1995 on a class trip I took several photos of the Moa. The bird just fascinated me. So when I saw what Lockwood had I instantly thought of the Museum of Natural History. It’s really that similar to how their taxidermy areas looked at least back then so it’s pretty cool that the magazine sees the similarities too. I think the types of dinosaurs in the museum that we never saw alive with our own eyes were ones that Hammond and Lockwood cloned early on. Since they were kinda test runs they may have died of illness quickly. The scientists may have not gotten it all just right yet. Maybe some of the breeds they were unable to clone ones that didn’t have health issues so they had to move on to other breeds. Maybe some of the breeds were extra hard or extra costly to care for so they thought it wasn’t worth it to continue to clone them for the park. Even though it is likely expensive to care for the T Rex, they knew it would be a popular animal so the return on investment made sense. It may have not made sense from a business stand point to keep breeding some of the others. I guess lots of things could have happened. Now that Mills and Lockwood are both gone, I’m guessing Dr. Wu doesn’t technically have a boss?! And I know the reason he didn’t want the indoraptor sold was because he was afraid others could replicate his work. It will be interesting to see what he does in the next film. He could become kind of a black market dinosaur creator / seller and maybe there are clients who will demand one of these particular dinosaurs so I guess there is always still a chance we could see one alive.
The Dilophosaurus still should’ve been given a better part in the movie than a taxidermied dinosaur
Better than nothing
I know. I really will cry if we don’t have a live one in the next film. We have already waited 25 years since seeing the first Dilo. It will be 28 years by the time the film comes out. Maybe in The Lost World and JP 3 they didn’t know how many fans loved the Dilo. But thanks to social media, they know now.
@@MadisonHarlow 4 years later you did, you did
the concavenator in there was especially interesting to me since, waaay back in the earliest leaks for Fallen Kingdom, a pic got out (back when Jurassic Park Legacy was still up) which some fans interpreted as being a concavenator with the guess that they'd appear live on-screen
im thinking theyre all nods to what will be featured in the next movie, since hybrids are out.
Did enyone notice the walking with dinosaurs diplodocus in the painting 3:52
I did
Whether or not those are statues or taxadermied specimens, I would love to see a living concavenator or (and especially) a dimetrodon in the future!
I didn't realize they were stuffed. That's pretty grim, especially since Lockwood is a dinosaur enthusiast and they don't really appear ot be older specimens that died of natural causes. Thanks for the video. Out of everything in the museum, the concavenator always caught my eye.
So Dimetrodon is semi-canon, that's all I needed to hear
Edit: I wonder if the feathers on the Mononykus are perhaps a nod to the outdated idea that they are actually early flightless birds instead of non-avian dinosaurs. While this is very unlikely in our reality, it could be real in the JP universe (similar to how Deinonychus is a species of Velociraptor in that universe). If so, that would mean that Mononykus is the most bird-like extinct animal Ingen has cloned, which may have allowed its genome to partially "circumvent" the null-allele that inhibits feather-growth in all the other dinosaurs.
Deinonychus was once called Velociraptor in our universe.
Callen Fields By literally only one researcher, Gregory S. Paul, who was already criticized for it back then. He just happened to have a huge influence on Crichton
Velociraptor is now known to be much closer to birds than Mononykus is.
Ozraptor4 I know
0:45
Anyone else noticing that's an image of a Diplodocus from Walking With Dinosaurs on the back wall?
They said in a book that before InGen clone a dinosaur they clone another prehistoric animal. I think that it was the dimetrodon that Lockwood has.
I want his museum lol.I thought it was really cool. I can’t wait to buy it on blu ray and watch it and pause on some scenes
The Diplodocus display bothers me a bit, only because one of the images behind it is lifted directly from the BBC's Walking With Dinosaurs.
I was also bothered. One of the great things about the original Jurassic Park film was the incredible amount of original paleoart they commissioned for preliminary concepts, props and movie backgrounds (Crash McCreery's sketches, Doug Henderson's mural). Since the reboot, there has been a lot of cut & pasting pre-existing artworks, in some cases without the artist's permission (eg. the uproar over plagiarised images used for the JW holoscape). This crap never happened under Stan Winston's watch.
0:50 Also is that the WWD diplodocus over there!
It makes sense to me that they would be Taxidermied animals. 'Extras' in the cloning procedure that may have died or Lockwood could have killed to fill his museum. His Taxidermist would have had to have been very reliable not to blab to others. :-)
I severely doubt any saine person would kill perfectly healthy clones to taxadermy them, they most likely died of old age or illness.
There were some casualties.
I have that magazine issue!
I really want the concavenator in jurassic world evolution!
And the Dimetrodon and Mononykus!
@@Sogga_sam no I do
@@brodoodtv8343 I don’t even remember me commenting here. I’m deleting that comment
Love to see the Concavenator but it looks like a juvie to me, also I like the idea that they are stuffed but I would love to explore more of that area in the manor especially all the skeletons there as well as love to see more and new dinos added to the series and games
I could definitely see those statues being prototype dinosaurs until the dinosaurs chosen to be displayed in the original park were finalized. Although, it would be interesting seeing some of them making an appearance in a future Jurassic Park story, especially the Concavenator, Dimetrodon, and Dracorex.
That’s crazy to believe that these clones are actually stuffed!I initially believed that these were how the clones looked in the wild,but as it turns out,they are
*Concavenator breaks out*
Mr. Arnold shouts 'Enough is enough. I've had it with these mother effin dinos on this mother effin island. He's too dangerous to be left alive!' *Activates lightsaber, notices oops wrong franchise, sits down again*
We got the dimetrodon now
I still want to see the Tricicloplot
What's that?
@@bradwhite5884 What Paul Kirby called the Spinosaurus
0:51 HOLY JESUS ITS A WALKING WITH DINOSAURS REFERENCE!!!
Probably taxidermed by the textures. Your videos are amazing.
Oh, Hammond and Lockwood have some e'splainin' to do!
Been waiting for a video like this
i never thought they would be stuffed animals if that is true or not but i love that i didnt even think of that when i first saw the movie great work Klayton
I love Concavenator!
This never gets old
Amazing video klayton you just know how to impressed me and everything.
I always wanted to see a Concavenator in Jurassic World evolution...
Now I want it even more and to look exacly like this, with colourfull skins and unique animations in addition !!!
As much as I'd like this to be true I have I believe the same issue or another magazine I got which has a picture of clearly an Apatosaurus listed as the nostalgic Brachiosaurus so it's hard for me to believe a magazine they probably just meant statues but said they were stuffed believe me it's one of many mistakes these film magazines make.
i have a theory; maybe benjamin lockwood has own private dinosaur park (not big as jurassic park, little zoo) and he cloned different species and when an animal dies he took it to his taxidermy collection
Dimetrodon is my favorite! Imagine seeing that on screen, growling an snuffing - pretty scary!
And maybe hissing at people when scared or angry and grunting and bellowing if content or happy.
I think there well done models of those dinosaurs because I figured that some artists look at these dinosaurs and decided to make these really well done version of these things
I think it makes sense if they were early prototypes that didn't live long and could've got either scrapped or they planned to try them again at a later date
That personal museum was actually the best part of JWFK.
Damn I never considered the idea they were taxidermied. Mind blown. Would LOVE to see Dimetrodon its been one of my favorite dinos since I was little.
Love your videos not many people talk about JP lore
These dinosaurs (and the dimetrodon) would also be awesome additions to Jurassic World Evolution I think.
This has blowned my mind
Stiggy was my favorite part about FK, he killed me
we need more of these!!!!
10/10 video my friend :)
GJ
Concavanator looks awesome
Bro I love your videos glad someone loves JP as much as me 😂😂
The secret Dino in FK:
*The Invisiblessaurus*
Doyouthinktheysaurus
Draxthedestroyersaurus
Can we have a minutes silence for the brachiosaurus?
*Welcome, to Jurassic Park*
These are quite fascinating. Saw that at a local store, I should like to have my own copy... Love the Dimetrodon :|
So that's why concavenator is epic... But tbh I'd love to see these dinosaurs in the movies aswell as the Troodon tylosaurus and Spinosaurus come back
I would really, really, really want to see monoykus in a film. Just a cool dinosaur, very unique looking. Love alverasaurids. And I guess it makes sense for them to not have feathers if they're older clones
I remember a video you made in which you talked about a Smilodon plush seen in the first movie. I think it’ll have been awesome if we had seen one in the Lockwood manor in stuffed form on display.
You definitely deserve more subscribers
Still no spinosaurus .
Not just yet ;)
i mean, there kinda was in the first JW..
The spinosaurus was actually planned for Fallen Kingdom, but later replaced by the carnotaurus, although, me personally I think its best that it wasn't because it was going to be killed a some flaming rocks from the volcano.
I think that they were once real dinosaurs and all this is very interesting.
Whenever Concavanator finnaly shows up,I expect a Mariachi band to play in the background
Those dino's are stuffed, that's an image I can't get out of my head
that dilo statue kinda has the same color scheme as the dominion dilo
downright to the frills
0:46 you can see the same diplodocus from the tv series walking with dinosaurs
When E Weekly did a article on X-Men the Last Stand they mention the character Quill as Kid Omega. Also mentioning a few plot points that didn't happen in the movie. So take their words with a grain of salt.
Am I the only one who likes the video before it even starts? Fantastic channel, man.
Hey thanks! That really means a lot! :D
Wow
Modericus
Dimetrodon
Concavenator
Dracorex
I never knew they were in JWFK!
Im so glad about this video, this is AWESOME!
Well, just like before, each had different characteristic on them, meaning that we could say they existed, but other observations can lead from one mystery to another, just like at the end o this video, there may be something much deeper that we yet have to discover. These videos are very analyzed from beginning to end, and each time you bring one topic, it leads to one clue. Arigato.
Unless there is new info as I'm quite late to this video, totally missed it, it's curious that Mattel has released a Concavinator with one of the new ranges for JW. It came into work on delivery and really threw me as to why it had been added but wasn't in the series.
Me immediately: troodon? TROODON! TROODON!
Would love to see them in a movie
Oooooh ahhhh. I love the idea of a secret dinosaur. After all, the JP3 Spinosaurus was off the book. So...
Great video dude
Hopefully this is canon.Because,I do agree that this would very fascinating,and one of the coolest things about Benjamin’s character.
Them being taxidermy is a far more interesting detail to have in the story than them being statues, so therefore until explicitly stated otherwise, that is what I'm going to go with.
Dimetrodon is my favorite dinosaur.
I'd like to see some of these taxidermy dinos appear in the next film as their living breathing selves.
Imagine being Maisie and being able to run around the Lockwood Mansion all day lol
Well at least the Mononychus have feathers, only on the tail. I like the Dimetrodon too by the way.
I was of the mind that they were just wax statues. I'm sure Lockwood had his favorites and I'm sure he probably just filled his own gallery with his portrayal of them.
That be facinating
I’ve always wanted to see Dimetredon he is one of my
Favorites!
Concave actor has the best name
Congratulations for this video
I think those dinosaurs in the background of Lockwood personal museum are just statues
I personally think it might be true. An only creature of those from the dioramas we actually saw in films as a living animal with almost no difference in appearence is a Velociraptor. And the Velociraptor was the first succesfully cloned animal ready to be displayed in Jurassic Park. The others possess many features that may lead us to consider them as prototype assets. A Dilophosaurus is the second well known creature, but it looked a bit different in it's final version. Especially its frill resembles a frilled dragon more then ever. Now focus on the Dimetrodon - it posses many details identical to crocodiles. Its teeth and overall shape of the jaws. Osteoderms on its back and much more sturdier body than the real life counterpart possessed. Mononykus resembles a long necked skinny chicken with tail. That may have some connection to the null allele problem that disabled InGen clones to be covered by any type of feathers. Those sparse quills may be everything that left. Other 3 species do not possess so bright hints, but even so we can find an explanation why they were not listed in the InGen list. Diplodocus siblings could die in their very young youth. Even in the wild nature the most of animals die in first days, weeks or months. When we consider the fact that these were unnaturally bred genetical experiments, the chance of dying soon is even higher. A Dracorex is carrying an egg in its beak and it looks like it is trying to escape with that egg from group of other dinos like a thief - quite strange behavior for a herbivorous pachycephalosaurid, isn't it? That may be a reference to its strange, agressive behavior when bred, again caused by errors i its genome. And as Dylan Horvath wrote - no one knew a Concavenator in seventies and early eighties when John and Benjamin started their experiments, so they might consider that specimen as the another error caused by wrong gene splicing... Those are just my personal opinions. Since I saw this video I had never thought that these creatures were anything more than just statues. But when you think a little bit about this other option of their purpous, it doesn't look so unlikely...
Hmm, maybe with some adjustments and training, the Concavenator has a perfect spot for a saddle..
Raptor vs Dilo = JWE headaches lol
These are all fascinating dinosaurs, but I'm not really sure whether they were taxidermied, or just statues. Regardless, it's nice to see them.