I really liked the method of presenting the closed questions with some relevance behind it, i.e. saying ‘a patient suffering from x might talk about these symptoms… does that sound like you?’ It really streamlines the evaluation of likely possibilities in a methodical and clear way!
blood in the urine , in think it is more bladder cancer , or less frequently renal CA, prostate CA showing as hematuria unless it is in advanced stage of the disease , i am not sure
I think there is some truth to it. A case was done very similar to this manner. Where complaints, social issues, ICE, investigations and management all done nicely intermixed (but with good order as above) Exam feedback was - no order or structure to the consultation
I really liked the method of presenting the closed questions with some relevance behind it, i.e. saying ‘a patient suffering from x might talk about these symptoms… does that sound like you?’ It really streamlines the evaluation of likely possibilities in a methodical and clear way!
Very useful , hope we will see more SCA consultations coming up please.
Redflag wgt loss?? Prostatitis? Sti
blood in the urine , in think it is more bladder cancer , or less frequently renal CA, prostate CA showing as hematuria unless it is in advanced stage of the disease , i am not sure
I would not usually ask a middle age man with frequency or nocturia whose wife asked him to see his GP about STI, other people may differ
Not a good example for an IMG. They will pass only a white candidates , if this is done in exam
what do you mean ? Why ?
I think there is some truth to it.
A case was done very similar to this manner. Where complaints, social issues, ICE, investigations and management all done nicely intermixed (but with good order as above)
Exam feedback was - no order or structure to the consultation
@@hjaafkerhaving no order or structure isn’t a failing point in its own entirety…unless jumping back and forth in disorganised way…multifactorial