I watched the whole shameless hit piece you did on Robert. Snarky and contemptuous, you revealed your own obsession with race. Why is that? Are you one of the 'chosen' or an anti-racist zealot who can't go through a single day without accusing someone of the worst sin imaginable - rayyyycism!
I have viewed a number of Robert Sepehr videos. There is an intriguing aspect to his historical perspectives, but there is an underlying agenda to his views that are Ideologically biased and entrenched. Don't comment to him on that point though. Robert will probably project his insecurities in response. Robert is infantile and thin skinned. I suspect that in a public forum where he is questioned he doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
They want what robert says to be true so badly they dont mind that hes lying to them. A BA in anthropology means NOTHING, the fact that he's pretending to be an anthropologist is shameless.
I followed and supported Robert for years. New Years Eve I simply asked a question, and posted a link from Science News and I did so politely and even pointed out that I was not attempting to be controversial. His response was to refer to me as silly, and his "uneducated friend" and that I should relax. He did not relax himself tho, he went on to block me, and then post another reply to the link that I only got to see the notification read from Google where he referred to me as the "Banned Idiot" and this for just asking polite questions he read between the lines on incorrectly thinking I was just someone being smart I guess. First off all I am educated. 8 years of college, 4 of which were for dentistry but I'm just an idiot for asking questions he deemed stupid. This lack of security and confidence in his own theories shines through to me in his reply. I was shocked after supporting him for years and watching lots of his videos. For a guy posting what amounts to many controversial theories his skin is pretty thin in my opinion. I've literally pinned David Icke to the wall with questions and he never once reacted this way to me but was always a gentleman not assuming anything about me or my education in the process of his replies! If only Robert were as mature in his reply to me pulicly I'd feel better about him but he changed my entire opinion of him in two posts both of which were in my eyes far out of line and ridiculous in the name calling he threw at me. All for a question or two that obvioulsy struck some chord or nerve with him. Robert if you read this I've unsubscribed to you everywhere! Not another dime! This and the name I use on X are my alias but if you saw the real name I've paid you under many times you'd know me. Not that it matters now because I'm done supporting you after the way you treated me. My other half actually suggested you were probably drinking and celebrating and just a mean drunk on New Years Eve that should not have been on the net at all with customers but even if that is the case you are the one in the wrong here acting like someone that would sooner tuck his tail and run than address a question any other anthropologist would answer, that you should address even one your snobbish anthropologist self deems stupid, and answer it maturely to another "EDUCATED" adult! You know? Kind of like one of your viewers did at the time responding to me the way you should have done yourself. If it was not from over celebrating New Years and that is the way you really are? Forget you I'm done with you and your take on anything now.
@user-mi7td6ry1i It was on the very same subject matter Robert brought up to begin with, white skin and adaptations. And a link to Cheddar man by other anthropologists pasted below. I never asked him any other questions in the past and I never once behaved in any manner like I attacked him. I asked polite questions he immediately took as condescending incorrectly judging me and it was never my tone or intention at all he simply read between the lines that way and blocked me! You could be next! Just ask him anything he takes wrong and watch. Mine was an anthropological question on the very matter he brought up to discuss, asked by a retired dentist (me) to a Dr. of anthropology and his response was childish and reeked of insecurity if not fear to discuss it when any other professional Dr. of Anthropology in the field would have been happy for the question and discussed it over professionally, or refer me to a medical or physical anthropologist that coud answer my questions. www.sci.news/othersciences/anthropology/cheddar-mans-face-05745.html#:~:text=Cheddar%20Man%20--%20a%20hunter-gatherer%20who%20lived%2010%2C000,to%20black%E2%80%99%20skin%20pigmentation%2C%20according%20to%20new%20research.
@user-mi7td6ry1i To further clarify. Robert contends that everyone was white. All the dark tribes became dark after coming up out of the caves and underground dwellings and that melanin is an adaptation from being exposed to the sun on the surface. Knowing this the article posted seems to counter this contention of Robert's. It proves that a haplogroup of people 9000 years ago, and one of the oldest known to exist as a Brit had dark chocolate skin apparently, and that blue eyes appeared long before white skin did because the DNA shows that Cheddar Man had blue eyes with dark skin. Cheddar Man's living relatives today however are light or white skinned seeming to say the opposite of what Robert's theories propose. So, my question was going to be whether white skin was the adaptation from long term living underground, if a dark tribe built them and then went down there to seek refuge for so long they lost pigment? I wonder because white skin and blue eyes, blond hair and freckles and apparently red hair and green eyes all come from the very same area as these huge underground dwellings being found like in Derin Ku Yu, Turkey. Every ingrediant to make the changes happen from developing lactose tolerance into old age, absorbing all the daily uptake of vitamins from the sun in 10 min. or so vs hours for dark skinned people to gain the same uptake, the environment and diet changes? It's all there by living underground long term. Or was white skin the result of hybridizing with a fair skinned red headed Neanderthal? It's appealing to some until you realize that the red hair genes in humans and that of Neanderthal do not match. The gene Neanderthal has is not found in human according to 23andme research. So Neanderthal did not give us the red hair. So what did? Anyway, you get the point. It's all out there and all should be looked at equally using facts and figures to decide for ourselves, which is the more likely scenario? Rather than discuss this matter tho, Robert chose to tuck tail and run away from it and make fun of me calling me names for even daring to ask! Then, apparently from the last google notice he went so far as to even be calling me an idiot that is banned. So if you ask me Robert is the child, saying by his actions, "How dare you question me!?" Like we are just supposed to accept his idea of reality and not wonder and that action indicates he is not so sure of his own theories because he ran away from the discussion about others ideas on the same subjet when it was presented to him. I ask you this, if you are going to post controversial theories then shouldn't you expect questions that make you defend it and many times over? Even from your peers? Any professor of anthropology answers questions for those they are educating they don't call them names or make fun no matter how stupid they may think the question is but my questions were far from stupid. They are common sense questions regarding the origins of white skin, which other articles contend did not even exist on the planet 9000 years ago. This should be discussed. Honestly I am shocked by Robert's response to me over this. I thought he'd love to discuss this! I do not for the life of me understand why he would not want to discuss this. I mean the theory that white people didn't even exist 9000 years ago and is a modern adaptation is just as controversial as his theory that everyone was white! What is he afraid of here exactly?
I like history but there is alot of occultism he mentions too. Hopefully it's just cultists attitude that makes him reply like that. Either way it's sad no self control at least he was honest to you. Did you want him to lie to you? At least know you now his temperament and it shows his character issues.
@@robertpatterson9943 Yeah, figures, and what he claimed Robert said about his DNA is total 100% BS. I've watched every video Robert has made for years
I'd like everyone to know that the swastika is a religious symbol and as long as you post it with words of encouragement, or somehow loving words, instead of hateful words, I think it's important. We think in symbols. We fear what is symbolized or villainized in other words. Fear is taught.
It doesn't matter if it goes left or right. All over the world this is found to be true. Just don't make it look like that one particular flag with the red and black.
symbol as old as humanity's history. Literally older than history. We should wonder why. Who were these ancient people is the question. 1. **Hinduism (India)**: "स्वस्तिक" (Svastika), a symbol of good fortune and well-being. 2. **Buddhism**: "卍" (Wàn) in Chinese, "만" (Man) in Korean, "まんじ" (Manji) in Japanese, represents Buddha's footprints. 3. **Jainism (India)**: "स्वस्तिक" (Svastika), symbolizes different states of existence. 4. **Native American Cultures**: Used by tribes like the Hopi and Navajo, often representing the sun. 5. **Ancient Greece**: "γαμμάδιον" (Gammadion), a decorative motif. 6. **Ancient Rome**: "Crux Gammata," used in mosaics and designs. 7. **Christianity**: Initially used as a symbol of Christ. 8. **Norse and Germanic Cultures**: Associated with Thor's hammer, a symbol of might. 9. **Slavic and Eastern Europe**: "коловрат" (kolovrat), a sun symbol in paganism. 10. **Baltic Cultures**: "Ugunskrusts" or "Pērkonkrusts," associated with the thunder god. 11. **Finland**: "Hakaristi," a symbol of luck, used by the Finnish Air Force. 12. **Ancient China**: "卐" or "卍" (Wàn), representing eternity and Buddhism. 13. **Japan (pre-Buddhism)**: "manji," symbolizing prosperity and good fortune. 14. **Celtic Cultures**: Likely a sun or motion symbol in art. 15. **Islamic Cultures**: Used in architecture as a decorative element. 16. **Contemporary Western Culture**: Associated with Nazi Germany, it symbolizes hate and anti-Semitism. This symbol's meaning varies greatly based on cultural context, ranging from spiritual significance in Eastern religions to its negative connotations in the West post-World War II.
Okay but just because you like him, why does this guy need to chill? You can like him, but that doesn’t mean everyone else has to. You can just as easily watch another channel & NOT comment. You’re comment is as silly as you think this video is 😂😂😂
You can't DMCA strike someone for something that's fair use. Doing so means making a false DMCA strike, and since DMCA is done under oath, doing so is a crime.
Interesting. While I think there is plenty of truth to his videos, I also think he, like many, is controlled opposition designed to direct a narritive. I have a feeling he knows much more than his videos suggest and some of them may be misleading.
Odd that you attacked him personally. Why didn’t you just present all of the facts you surely must have that counter things he said that you seem to take offense to? Seems like you are the charlatan.
Robert doesn't make those videos in a vacuum, his material reflects many other content creators who are referencing pertinent historical data also. His constant assertions of the existence of cultural and anthropological marxism are absolutely correct in my view.
Maybe do something worthwhile with your life energy. Attacking a man who has informed & inspired so many is beyond redundant. Leave it alone. Move on with yourself.
Robert knows he's lying. He's doing this for money and to leave something behind or "out there" for a certain demographic to attach themselves to. I think he's cringe...have to be another level of delusional to be confidently wrong.
Don't get me wrong I like Robert Zephyr and have for years besides his videos I've read a lot of the material posted online that he put but all y'all out here going crazy on this channel for trying to take a step back like we all should and think about the things that are being presented to us that we take in blindly just because we like a content creator. If anything every single person on here being rude to this Creator because of Robert should honestly realize that they have created an idol and most likely are taking every word that he says as pure facts just because he's gotten some negative press that makes him seem like he's Against The Frey.... this is the same concept I tell people who are still following politics and get so angry when someone talks about their favorite candidate. If you are willing to be argumentative and combative over someone you don't personally know then just know that you have fallen into the Mind raping trap that even Mister Robert has spoke of numerous times! The only other thing I would like to add is every single person who talks about any of the stuff that Robert talks about will get their channels killed or strikes... that should make anyone of a sound of mine stop for a minute and think about the reality of things. Yall have a good one nonetheless 👊😎🤙
I also like Robert's work and i have a very few questions about it. But anytime some asks a question deemed " stupid" or " a troll" Robert and/or his supporters fall fast and hard , labelling you all sorts of things. Robert is the real deal, yes? He's done alot of research and shown us all many things. Does that mean he is never wrong, never made an oversight or just a simple mistake? IMO it takes away from his mountains of good work to see SOME of his responses to good faith questions.
People are starting to evolve their understanding of what and who trolls are and are sick and tired of them. They are part of the mechanism of cultural Marxism that Robert for one, warns of.
My original video :
files.catbox.moe/z4ba27.mp4
I watched the whole shameless hit piece you did on Robert. Snarky and contemptuous, you revealed your own obsession with race. Why is that? Are you one of the 'chosen' or an anti-racist zealot who can't go through a single day without accusing someone of the worst sin imaginable - rayyyycism!
GO to your mummy little boy
I have viewed a number of Robert Sepehr videos. There is an intriguing aspect to his historical perspectives, but there is an underlying agenda to his views that are Ideologically biased and entrenched. Don't comment to him on that point though. Robert will probably project his insecurities in response. Robert is infantile and thin skinned. I suspect that in a public forum where he is questioned he doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
They want what robert says to be true so badly they dont mind that hes lying to them. A BA in anthropology means NOTHING, the fact that he's pretending to be an anthropologist is shameless.
Seriously hes BA ???????????????? ahhahahahaha I'm a Philosopher, yayyyy
@@TicketLicker yeah, seriously dude, all you have to do is pass some courses, maybe half need to be related to the field. It's ridiculous.
Robert Sepehr owes you nothing, get a life little guy.
Thank you sir, for creating a most illuminating comments section
I followed and supported Robert for years. New Years Eve I simply asked a question, and posted a link from Science News and I did so politely and even pointed out that I was not attempting to be controversial. His response was to refer to me as silly, and his "uneducated friend" and that I should relax. He did not relax himself tho, he went on to block me, and then post another reply to the link that I only got to see the notification read from Google where he referred to me as the "Banned Idiot" and this for just asking polite questions he read between the lines on incorrectly thinking I was just someone being smart I guess.
First off all I am educated. 8 years of college, 4 of which were for dentistry but I'm just an idiot for asking questions he deemed stupid. This lack of security and confidence in his own theories shines through to me in his reply. I was shocked after supporting him for years and watching lots of his videos. For a guy posting what amounts to many controversial theories his skin is pretty thin in my opinion. I've literally pinned David Icke to the wall with questions and he never once reacted this way to me but was always a gentleman not assuming anything about me or my education in the process of his replies!
If only Robert were as mature in his reply to me pulicly I'd feel better about him but he changed my entire opinion of him in two posts both of which were in my eyes far out of line and ridiculous in the name calling he threw at me. All for a question or two that obvioulsy struck some chord or nerve with him.
Robert if you read this I've unsubscribed to you everywhere! Not another dime! This and the name I use on X are my alias but if you saw the real name I've paid you under many times you'd know me. Not that it matters now because I'm done supporting you after the way you treated me. My other half actually suggested you were probably drinking and celebrating and just a mean drunk on New Years Eve that should not have been on the net at all with customers but even if that is the case you are the one in the wrong here acting like someone that would sooner tuck his tail and run than address a question any other anthropologist would answer, that you should address even one your snobbish anthropologist self deems stupid, and answer it maturely to another "EDUCATED" adult! You know? Kind of like one of your viewers did at the time responding to me the way you should have done yourself. If it was not from over celebrating New Years and that is the way you really are? Forget you I'm done with you and your take on anything now.
Sorry that happened to you.
@user-mi7td6ry1i It was on the very same subject matter Robert brought up to begin with, white skin and adaptations. And a link to Cheddar man by other anthropologists pasted below. I never asked him any other questions in the past and I never once behaved in any manner like I attacked him. I asked polite questions he immediately took as condescending incorrectly judging me and it was never my tone or intention at all he simply read between the lines that way and blocked me! You could be next! Just ask him anything he takes wrong and watch. Mine was an anthropological question on the very matter he brought up to discuss, asked by a retired dentist (me) to a Dr. of anthropology and his response was childish and reeked of insecurity if not fear to discuss it when any other professional Dr. of Anthropology in the field would have been happy for the question and discussed it over professionally, or refer me to a medical or physical anthropologist that coud answer my questions. www.sci.news/othersciences/anthropology/cheddar-mans-face-05745.html#:~:text=Cheddar%20Man%20--%20a%20hunter-gatherer%20who%20lived%2010%2C000,to%20black%E2%80%99%20skin%20pigmentation%2C%20according%20to%20new%20research.
@user-mi7td6ry1i To further clarify. Robert contends that everyone was white. All the dark tribes became dark after coming up out of the caves and underground dwellings and that melanin is an adaptation from being exposed to the sun on the surface. Knowing this the article posted seems to counter this contention of Robert's. It proves that a haplogroup of people 9000 years ago, and one of the oldest known to exist as a Brit had dark chocolate skin apparently, and that blue eyes appeared long before white skin did because the DNA shows that Cheddar Man had blue eyes with dark skin.
Cheddar Man's living relatives today however are light or white skinned seeming to say the opposite of what Robert's theories propose. So, my question was going to be whether white skin was the adaptation from long term living underground, if a dark tribe built them and then went down there to seek refuge for so long they lost pigment? I wonder because white skin and blue eyes, blond hair and freckles and apparently red hair and green eyes all come from the very same area as these huge underground dwellings being found like in Derin Ku Yu, Turkey. Every ingrediant to make the changes happen from developing lactose tolerance into old age, absorbing all the daily uptake of vitamins from the sun in 10 min. or so vs hours for dark skinned people to gain the same uptake, the environment and diet changes? It's all there by living underground long term.
Or was white skin the result of hybridizing with a fair skinned red headed Neanderthal? It's appealing to some until you realize that the red hair genes in humans and that of Neanderthal do not match. The gene Neanderthal has is not found in human according to 23andme research. So Neanderthal did not give us the red hair. So what did? Anyway, you get the point. It's all out there and all should be looked at equally using facts and figures to decide for ourselves, which is the more likely scenario?
Rather than discuss this matter tho, Robert chose to tuck tail and run away from it and make fun of me calling me names for even daring to ask! Then, apparently from the last google notice he went so far as to even be calling me an idiot that is banned. So if you ask me Robert is the child, saying by his actions, "How dare you question me!?" Like we are just supposed to accept his idea of reality and not wonder and that action indicates he is not so sure of his own theories because he ran away from the discussion about others ideas on the same subjet when it was presented to him. I ask you this, if you are going to post controversial theories then shouldn't you expect questions that make you defend it and many times over? Even from your peers?
Any professor of anthropology answers questions for those they are educating they don't call them names or make fun no matter how stupid they may think the question is but my questions were far from stupid. They are common sense questions regarding the origins of white skin, which other articles contend did not even exist on the planet 9000 years ago. This should be discussed. Honestly I am shocked by Robert's response to me over this. I thought he'd love to discuss this! I do not for the life of me understand why he would not want to discuss this. I mean the theory that white people didn't even exist 9000 years ago and is a modern adaptation is just as controversial as his theory that everyone was white! What is he afraid of here exactly?
I like history but there is alot of occultism he mentions too. Hopefully it's just cultists attitude that makes him reply like that. Either way it's sad no self control at least he was honest to you. Did you want him to lie to you? At least know you now his temperament and it shows his character issues.
SDF (Sepehr Defense Force) is pretty active.
Anybody gpnna tell this dude how pathetic he is,, or do i have to?
😂 yes sir he is pathetic
It can be a team effort
I like Robert a lot!
He’s the best this guy voted for Biden and pees sitting down
@@robertpatterson9943 Yeah, figures, and what he claimed Robert said about his DNA is total 100% BS. I've watched every video Robert has made for years
Robert is awesome
I like historically correct blue eyed long hair Jesus (an actual historical person) not the early Roman bowl cut mumbo jumbo Caesar looking depiction.
I'd like everyone to know that the swastika is a religious symbol and as long as you post it with words of encouragement, or somehow loving words, instead of hateful words, I think it's important. We think in symbols. We fear what is symbolized or villainized in other words.
Fear is taught.
It doesn't matter if it goes left or right. All over the world this is found to be true.
Just don't make it look like that one particular flag with the red and black.
@@Sorg22I left is for more spiritual Pursuits. Right is for worldly Pursuits. Pretty simple
@@Sorg22 What's wrong with the one that has red, white and black?
ROBERT SEPEHR GANG FOO BETTER RECOGNOTICE
Curious to know what issues you had with his content?
Nooo Vetti Troll king 😓 we will fight for your rights to free speech 😈✊
symbol as old as humanity's history. Literally older than history. We should wonder why. Who were these ancient people is the question.
1. **Hinduism (India)**: "स्वस्तिक" (Svastika), a symbol of good fortune and well-being.
2. **Buddhism**: "卍" (Wàn) in Chinese, "만" (Man) in Korean, "まんじ" (Manji) in Japanese, represents Buddha's footprints.
3. **Jainism (India)**: "स्वस्तिक" (Svastika), symbolizes different states of existence.
4. **Native American Cultures**: Used by tribes like the Hopi and Navajo, often representing the sun.
5. **Ancient Greece**: "γαμμάδιον" (Gammadion), a decorative motif.
6. **Ancient Rome**: "Crux Gammata," used in mosaics and designs.
7. **Christianity**: Initially used as a symbol of Christ.
8. **Norse and Germanic Cultures**: Associated with Thor's hammer, a symbol of might.
9. **Slavic and Eastern Europe**: "коловрат" (kolovrat), a sun symbol in paganism.
10. **Baltic Cultures**: "Ugunskrusts" or "Pērkonkrusts," associated with the thunder god.
11. **Finland**: "Hakaristi," a symbol of luck, used by the Finnish Air Force.
12. **Ancient China**: "卐" or "卍" (Wàn), representing eternity and Buddhism.
13. **Japan (pre-Buddhism)**: "manji," symbolizing prosperity and good fortune.
14. **Celtic Cultures**: Likely a sun or motion symbol in art.
15. **Islamic Cultures**: Used in architecture as a decorative element.
16. **Contemporary Western Culture**: Associated with Nazi Germany, it symbolizes hate and anti-Semitism.
This symbol's meaning varies greatly based on cultural context, ranging from spiritual significance in Eastern religions to its negative connotations in the West post-World War II.
Ty the more they hate and slander Robert the more we love him
I'm guessing the almost 100% negative feedback on this video is not the reception you thought you would get, huh?
Its exactly what I thought I'd get
worry about yourself instead of trying to shit talk other youtubers, cause then you get your shit kicked in, in response.
@@nothingbutgrief888 no
Smart people talk about ideas
Dumb people (you) talk about other people
Well said
Like you just did here in this comment?
@@ItsMeNanaD71 aw did you just try and perform a "No u"? This aint the schoolyard. Nice try though.
What you mean this ain’t a school yard? Your first comment was a school yard tier burn 😂
@@caesarpizza1338 I was literally Paraphrasing Socrates, you empty headed bum
Dude you honestly need to chill out. I like Robert, he brings up interesting things, but that doesn’t mean I agree with everything he puts out.
Robert is the light in a dark world of anthropology
Okay but just because you like him, why does this guy need to chill? You can like him, but that doesn’t mean everyone else has to. You can just as easily watch another channel & NOT comment. You’re comment is as silly as you think this video is 😂😂😂
@@ItsMeNanaD71you wanted some attension so badly here. Its funny.
I fail to see the issue
You can't DMCA strike someone for something that's fair use. Doing so means making a false DMCA strike, and since DMCA is done under oath, doing so is a crime.
Interesting. While I think there is plenty of truth to his videos, I also think he, like many, is controlled opposition designed to direct a narritive. I have a feeling he knows much more than his videos suggest and some of them may be misleading.
What truths? He's misused so many words while explaining. Lol...
Odd that you attacked him personally. Why didn’t you just present all of the facts you surely must have that counter things he said that you seem to take offense to? Seems like you are the charlatan.
im a dirty dog
Robert doesn't make those videos in a vacuum, his material reflects many other content creators who are referencing pertinent historical data also. His constant assertions of the existence of cultural and anthropological marxism are absolutely correct in my view.
What a crappy lil vid .
Horrible video makes me want to watch a good one perhaps Robert has one I haven’t seen yet
Maybe do something worthwhile with your life energy. Attacking a man who has informed & inspired so many is beyond redundant. Leave it alone. Move on with yourself.
And using AI for the voice rather than his/her own voice.
Was this video made by the FBI?😅
Robert is great go away little boy.
Robert is awsome!
What a waste of time
Robert knows he's lying. He's doing this for money and to leave something behind or "out there" for a certain demographic to attach themselves to. I think he's cringe...have to be another level of delusional to be confidently wrong.
Don't get me wrong I like Robert Zephyr and have for years besides his videos I've read a lot of the material posted online that he put but all y'all out here going crazy on this channel for trying to take a step back like we all should and think about the things that are being presented to us that we take in blindly just because we like a content creator. If anything every single person on here being rude to this Creator because of Robert should honestly realize that they have created an idol and most likely are taking every word that he says as pure facts just because he's gotten some negative press that makes him seem like he's Against The Frey.... this is the same concept I tell people who are still following politics and get so angry when someone talks about their favorite candidate. If you are willing to be argumentative and combative over someone you don't personally know then just know that you have fallen into the Mind raping trap that even Mister Robert has spoke of numerous times! The only other thing I would like to add is every single person who talks about any of the stuff that Robert talks about will get their channels killed or strikes... that should make anyone of a sound of mine stop for a minute and think about the reality of things. Yall have a good one nonetheless 👊😎🤙
I also like Robert's work and i have a very few questions about it. But anytime some asks a question deemed " stupid" or " a troll" Robert and/or his supporters fall fast and hard , labelling you all sorts of things. Robert is the real deal, yes? He's done alot of research and shown us all many things. Does that mean he is never wrong, never made an oversight or just a simple mistake? IMO it takes away from his mountains of good work to see SOME of his responses to good faith questions.
People are starting to evolve their understanding of what and who trolls are and are sick and tired of them. They are part of the mechanism of cultural Marxism that Robert for one, warns of.
This should hopefully land you or the originator if that's not you, a lawsuit. You stepped in your own sht here
Yeah, I am now convinced this video is BS. Clout chaser..
Hes embarrassed for you, not because of you
Gracias ººº
Cry moar
You refer to a quote but don't actually say what it was. Have you graduated high school? Do you have a degree in anything?
Interesting. I thought your channel would be bigger.
Hahaha you know nothing
🙄
Robert speaks the truth. He does many Twitter spaces for hours on end, you should come on there and discuss your little gripes.
😢……😂
Smell like feminine beta energy to me.