Steven Weinberg, Nobel Prize in Physics 1979: Interview

Interview with Professor Steven Weinberg by Joanna Rose, science writer, 7 December 2001.
Professor Weinberg talks about how he became interested in cosmology, his path into physics (1:40), the 'Golden Age' of cosmology (6:51), his greatest contribution (10:00), 'the final theory' (12:38), and the absence of a cosmic plan for humankind (16:01).

[@mubarakhussain6462]

Sir Steven Weinberg, one of the greatest theoretical physicist and cosmologist. And such a humble and kind human being. May his soul rest in eternal peace.

[@no-one-in-particular]

Sir?

[@YatinJaiswal]

Such a sober interview.
Loved every moment of it.

[@ruchpat1]

Thank you Nobel Prize for posting this video.

[@RenaBon]

Always pleasure to listen to them.

[@meralguzey..ph.d538]

Lovely. .Thank you for sharing.

[@science212]

Steven Weinberg, Robert Park, Margaret Geller, P.W. Atkins, Jim Peebles, Joseph Silk, John Preskill, Alan Lightman, Sheldon Glashow, Robert Knapp, Victor Stenger and Sandra Faber. Great science writers.

[@SOLIDCORNER418]

You did not mentioned abdus salam’?? R u okay

[@haidarsheikhahmadi7679]

A brilliant mind throughout human history, like Newton, Einstein, Gauss, and many others.

[@wasifulalam1393]

I was trying to do a calculation for a particle but always getting a slight deviation of Weinberg ratio for interaction with W boson. I had to manually adjust for getting the final result, Still puzzled. it was about the magnetic moment related to neutron. Yes, the problem relates black body radiation. This discussion gave me some insight.

[@123guessing]

Steven 😍😍😍

[@kareemhassaan7039]

rest in peace

[@DrakeLarson-js9px]

But Inversion Physics has a prediction of dark energy in earth at 3480Km radius and inward - this might finally become more acceptable - it is a very counter-preponderant to Weinberg’s most famous 1972 book, theorem 2, that was solidly based on Einstein’s most basic assumption…Soo….???Ouch!?? to General Relativity experts as already stated by Edward Teller in several of his videos… It’s these sorts of debates that make physics so enjoyable. 🙂

[@virendrasahani6871]

Every scientist because of curiosity?

[@keepcalm7453]

💝😇😇😇😇😇😇😇💝

[@Doron812]

"Millions of years of accidents"... yes, sir you like theorizing a lot.

[@andriinovakov738]

A muon is 210 times heavier than an electron, it's like a counterweight for a construction crane for building schools, or a gyroscope for an atomic rocket.
Question: if a smartphone lasts a year on a single charge, who will make an atomic bomb first to sell VINs to terrorists in London's accounting department.
P.S. To see the script(scenario), you first need to see the binding(cover of the book). The absence of the role of a glassblower in the formulas has a positive effect on the sale of VIN to terrorists in a London bank.
If there is no desire to see the script, then it will not appear, but this does not negate the fact that the script is present.