because going at the speed of sound, high pressure builds up in front of you, making more drag. when going faster, there is no buildup as you constantly go in front of it
@@EugeneKhutoryansky Thanks for making my day over an over. The EM vid with the angel and devil IS the "stairway to heaven" of electrical education. Also while I have your rare attention! YOUR NAME IS A SUB REDDIT Please let me mod you!
@@EugeneKhutoryansky @Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky you explained a number of things incorrectly in this video and are spreading some very large and problematic misunderstandings. The drag force DOES NOT decrease passed the speed of sound, the drag COEFFICIENT does, which is a tool used for analyzing behavior of an object but decreasing drag coefficient DOES NOT mean decreasing the drag itself as the drag coefficient is inversely proportional to the square of the velocity. So at double the speed the drag coefficient would have to decrease by a factor of four to get the SAME net drag, and the drag coefficient does NOT decrease that much passed Mach 1. Second you are entirely incorrect in saying that there is no pressure build up in front of the object, there definitely is, it is called the bow shock and anything traveling faster than Mach 1 will have a bow shock, a large pressure spike in front of the object. Your animation only shows what is known as the oblique shock that travels out behind the object but does NOT show how the pressure in front builds up with a bow shock!!! I will copy this to all of your comments as it is important you know you are spreading significant misinformation regarding high-speed aerodynamics
AkiraR, what I said in the video is correct and what you are saying is also correct. The following quote is from NASA’s website: "Once past the transonic regime, the drag coefficient and the drag decreases, and less thrust is required to fly supersonically. However, as it proceeds toward higher supersonic speeds, the drag increases (even though the drag coefficient may show a decrease). " Source: history.nasa.gov/SP-367/chapt5.htm Also, in the video, I never said anything about if there is a pressure build up in front of the object.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky you explained a number of things incorrectly in this video and are spreading some very large and problematic misunderstandings. The drag force DOES NOT decrease passed the speed of sound, the drag COEFFICIENT does, which is a tool used for analyzing behavior of an object but decreasing drag coefficient DOES NOT mean decreasing the drag itself as the drag coefficient is inversely proportional to the square of the velocity. So at double the speed the drag coefficient would have to decrease by a factor of four to get the SAME net drag, and the drag coefficient does NOT decrease that much passed Mach 1. Second you are entirely incorrect in saying that there is no pressure build up in front of the object, there definitely is, it is called the bow shock and anything traveling faster than Mach 1 will have a bow shock, a large pressure spike in front of the object. Your animation only shows what is known as the oblique shock that travels out behind the object but does NOT show how the pressure in front builds up with a bow shock!!!
AkiraR, what I said in the video is correct and what you are saying is also correct. The following quote is from NASA’s website: "Once past the transonic regime, the drag coefficient and the drag decreases, and less thrust is required to fly supersonically. However, as it proceeds toward higher supersonic speeds, the drag increases (even though the drag coefficient may show a decrease). " Source: history.nasa.gov/SP-367/chapt5.htm Also, in the video, I never said anything about if there is a pressure build up in front of the object.
I gotta say: the shout-outs the science content creator community has been doing for each other is a welcome sight. I've been watching and following all of you for A WHILE, and to see this solidarity playing out makes me happy beyond description. Keep being awesome, guys!
@@EugeneKhutoryansky @Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky you explained a number of things incorrectly in this video and are spreading some very large and problematic misunderstandings. The drag force DOES NOT decrease passed the speed of sound, the drag COEFFICIENT does, which is a tool used for analyzing behavior of an object but decreasing drag coefficient DOES NOT mean decreasing the drag itself as the drag coefficient is inversely proportional to the square of the velocity. So at double the speed the drag coefficient would have to decrease by a factor of four to get the SAME net drag, and the drag coefficient does NOT decrease that much passed Mach 1. Second you are entirely incorrect in saying that there is no pressure build up in front of the object, there definitely is, it is called the bow shock and anything traveling faster than Mach 1 will have a bow shock, a large pressure spike in front of the object. Your animation only shows what is known as the oblique shock that travels out behind the object but does NOT show how the pressure in front builds up with a bow shock!!!
AkiraR, what I said in the video is correct and what you are saying is also correct. The following quote is from NASA’s website: "Once past the transonic regime, the drag coefficient and the drag decreases, and less thrust is required to fly supersonically. However, as it proceeds toward higher supersonic speeds, the drag increases (even though the drag coefficient may show a decrease). " Source: history.nasa.gov/SP-367/chapt5.htm Also, in the video, I never said anything about if there is a pressure build up in front of the object.
So if you travel exactly the speed of sound, for how long can you 'build up' the high pressure in front? Is there some limit after which air starts leaking supersonically/liquefies or something?
Brilliant, well-explained animations. You guys are becoming a benchmark for what I expect good visual representation of a physical phenomenon should look like.
Wow.great visualization as always. Thanks you are back. Trust me, very often, I keep searching your channel for the new content. Very delighted to see your new.video. thanks a ton man . Stay blessed always 🌺👍
I loved this one, reminds me of an artillery round fired and diffusing or lensing light at its tip, exactly what u are describing. Thank u my son really understood the visuals.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky @Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky you explained a number of things incorrectly in this video and are spreading some very large and problematic misunderstandings. The drag force DOES NOT decrease passed the speed of sound, the drag COEFFICIENT does, which is a tool used for analyzing behavior of an object but decreasing drag coefficient DOES NOT mean decreasing the drag itself as the drag coefficient is inversely proportional to the square of the velocity. So at double the speed the drag coefficient would have to decrease by a factor of four to get the SAME net drag, and the drag coefficient does NOT decrease that much passed Mach 1. Second you are entirely incorrect in saying that there is no pressure build up in front of the object, there definitely is, it is called the bow shock and anything traveling faster than Mach 1 will have a bow shock, a large pressure spike in front of the object. Your animation only shows what is known as the oblique shock that travels out behind the object but does NOT show how the pressure in front builds up with a bow shock!!!
AkiraR, what I said in the video is correct and what you are saying is also correct. The following quote is from NASA’s website: "Once past the transonic regime, the drag coefficient and the drag decreases, and less thrust is required to fly supersonically. However, as it proceeds toward higher supersonic speeds, the drag increases (even though the drag coefficient may show a decrease). " Source: history.nasa.gov/SP-367/chapt5.htm Also, in the video, I never said anything about if there is a pressure build up in front of the object.
I’ve always wondered what a sonic boom would be like in water considering that water being a liquid doesn’t compress... or least not in the same way gas does.
It does, every material can compress. It just has takes more energy to compress. Liquid has a higher density than gas, so sound waves can travel faster, at a higher energy cost.
@@leomadero562 though it compresses very little. If you put 10,000 atmospheres of pressure on a sample of water, its volume will still go down less than half a percent.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky @Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky you explained a number of things incorrectly in this video and are spreading some very large and problematic misunderstandings. The drag force DOES NOT decrease passed the speed of sound, the drag COEFFICIENT does, which is a tool used for analyzing behavior of an object but decreasing drag coefficient DOES NOT mean decreasing the drag itself as the drag coefficient is inversely proportional to the square of the velocity. So at double the speed the drag coefficient would have to decrease by a factor of four to get the SAME net drag, and the drag coefficient does NOT decrease that much passed Mach 1. Second you are entirely incorrect in saying that there is no pressure build up in front of the object, there definitely is, it is called the bow shock and anything traveling faster than Mach 1 will have a bow shock, a large pressure spike in front of the object. Your animation only shows what is known as the oblique shock that travels out behind the object but does NOT show how the pressure in front builds up with a bow shock!!!
AkiraR, what I said in the video is correct and what you are saying is also correct. The following quote is from NASA’s website: "Once past the transonic regime, the drag coefficient and the drag decreases, and less thrust is required to fly supersonically. However, as it proceeds toward higher supersonic speeds, the drag increases (even though the drag coefficient may show a decrease). " Source: history.nasa.gov/SP-367/chapt5.htm Also, in the video, I never said anything about if there is a pressure build up in front of the object.
Really neat seeing the boundary conditions visualization versus the simple not so accurate or even precise seems 2D or maybe 3D representations of waves, fields, phonons and/or photons with or without time changes.
Polarization is something that I still need to confidently grasp accurately since seems is explained without clear graphical representations of the quantitative data well in most examples. Amazes me how properties of materials data isn't well detailed either when dealing with the EMS, when comes to the range of polarization with the thermal, electric, magnetic and I guess generically speaking optical properties.
Reminds me of like looking at an oscilloscope or spectrum analyzer detail where the components of the signals aren't all detailed in separate channels typically. Then like the missing polarization for the potential, current and frequency details. Seems there is way more to perceive with signals. Even the strange world of DC signals. Both get me highly concerned when dealing with human body electromagnetism and health concerns... especially when some know more malicious deadly ways that are like snipers poaching the more vulnerable and innocent compared to them. Pathetic how concealed and obstructed the science is detailed in that regards. I've been trying to super laymen explain on dewdefenseprojects blogspot.com
Thanks! I still watch all of your video over and over. I hope you will make the video about your idea about how to learn physics and math for general people thanks 😃😃
Thanks. I am glad you like my videos. I am not sure I understand your suggestion, since all my videos are about how to learn physics and math for general people. Thanks.
Ones that burn fuel of some sort can redirect exhaust gases to the nose and out thru holes or behind a shielding cone in the front. This reduces hydrodynamic drag as the gases envelop the torpedo. They are essentially underwater rockets. Though not ~ 3600 mph as sound travels in water, 200 to 250 mph is still pretty damn fast. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superkavitierender_Unterwasserlaufk%C3%B6rper .. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VA-111_Shkval
It could be more interesting to see this with the acceleration of the object, to see what happens when it something reach the speed of sound and when it surpasses it.
yes, your channel is a treasure. I am really greedy at hoping for more content, longer, and more often. But stay safe and you have my support. I also have a question; can there be a sonic boom inside a solid?!!!
@@EugeneKhutoryansky @Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky you explained a number of things incorrectly in this video and are spreading some very large and problematic misunderstandings. The drag force DOES NOT decrease passed the speed of sound, the drag COEFFICIENT does, which is a tool used for analyzing behavior of an object but decreasing drag coefficient DOES NOT mean decreasing the drag itself as the drag coefficient is inversely proportional to the square of the velocity. So at double the speed the drag coefficient would have to decrease by a factor of four to get the SAME net drag, and the drag coefficient does NOT decrease that much passed Mach 1. Second you are entirely incorrect in saying that there is no pressure build up in front of the object, there definitely is, it is called the bow shock and anything traveling faster than Mach 1 will have a bow shock, a large pressure spike in front of the object. Your animation only shows what is known as the oblique shock that travels out behind the object but does NOT show how the pressure in front builds up with a bow shock!!!
AkiraR, what I said in the video is correct and what you are saying is also correct. The following quote is from NASA’s website: "Once past the transonic regime, the drag coefficient and the drag decreases, and less thrust is required to fly supersonically. However, as it proceeds toward higher supersonic speeds, the drag increases (even though the drag coefficient may show a decrease). " Source: history.nasa.gov/SP-367/chapt5.htm Also, in the video, I never said anything about if there is a pressure build up in front of the object.
please do a video wich visualizes the curvature of space-time and quantum gravity fields amazing videos I'm addicted to them even tho I don't know much about physics and science
less drag when you go faster than the speed of sound? that is very interesting
@@MauryaEducation damn i didn't know my family were fetuses
because going at the speed of sound, high pressure builds up in front of you, making more drag.
when going faster, there is no buildup as you constantly go in front of it
rolling around at the speed of sound
Wondering if that means the pressure in the front can build up indefinitely through time?
@@hexagon8899 there is build up, but not in front of you.
Short and sweet, missed you guys.
Glad you're still making your content, your channel is a global treasure.
Thanks for the compliment.
agreed
@@EugeneKhutoryansky can you please turn on Bangla Caption in this Video
Cause I'm not good at English
Please
@@EugeneKhutoryansky Thanks for making my day over an over.
The EM vid with the angel and devil IS the "stairway to heaven" of electrical education.
Also while I have your rare attention!
YOUR NAME IS A SUB REDDIT
Please let me mod you!
Exactly
I love your visualizations and calm explanations. It’s so much easier to understand concepts when you have presented them. Thanks!
Thanks.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky @Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky you explained a number of things incorrectly in this video and are spreading some very large and problematic misunderstandings.
The drag force DOES NOT decrease passed the speed of sound, the drag COEFFICIENT does, which is a tool used for analyzing behavior of an object but decreasing drag coefficient DOES NOT mean decreasing the drag itself as the drag coefficient is inversely proportional to the square of the velocity. So at double the speed the drag coefficient would have to decrease by a factor of four to get the SAME net drag, and the drag coefficient does NOT decrease that much passed Mach 1.
Second you are entirely incorrect in saying that there is no pressure build up in front of the object, there definitely is, it is called the bow shock and anything traveling faster than Mach 1 will have a bow shock, a large pressure spike in front of the object. Your animation only shows what is known as the oblique shock that travels out behind the object but does NOT show how the pressure in front builds up with a bow shock!!!
I will copy this to all of your comments as it is important you know you are spreading significant misinformation regarding high-speed aerodynamics
AkiraR, what I said in the video is correct and what you are saying is also correct. The following quote is from NASA’s website: "Once past the transonic regime, the drag coefficient and the drag decreases, and less thrust is required to fly supersonically. However, as it proceeds toward higher supersonic speeds, the drag increases (even though the drag coefficient may show a decrease). "
Source: history.nasa.gov/SP-367/chapt5.htm
Also, in the video, I never said anything about if there is a pressure build up in front of the object.
@@Ender240sxS13someone’s got their panties in a bunch
Thank you Eugene and Kira!
Thanks.
Appreciate the rock music in the background lol
It feels like I’m watching an anime character explain how another characters attack works.
I thought this was a episode of sonic boom under water lol
me too
No
Me too
Same
thanks for the visualization, I never understood the shape till now
Thanks. Glad my video was helpful.
Same
dont forget its in 3d not 2d like the video
@@EugeneKhutoryansky you explained a number of things incorrectly in this video and are spreading some very large and problematic misunderstandings.
The drag force DOES NOT decrease passed the speed of sound, the drag COEFFICIENT does, which is a tool used for analyzing behavior of an object but decreasing drag coefficient DOES NOT mean decreasing the drag itself as the drag coefficient is inversely proportional to the square of the velocity. So at double the speed the drag coefficient would have to decrease by a factor of four to get the SAME net drag, and the drag coefficient does NOT decrease that much passed Mach 1.
Second you are entirely incorrect in saying that there is no pressure build up in front of the object, there definitely is, it is called the bow shock and anything traveling faster than Mach 1 will have a bow shock, a large pressure spike in front of the object. Your animation only shows what is known as the oblique shock that travels out behind the object but does NOT show how the pressure in front builds up with a bow shock!!!
AkiraR, what I said in the video is correct and what you are saying is also correct. The following quote is from NASA’s website: "Once past the transonic regime, the drag coefficient and the drag decreases, and less thrust is required to fly supersonically. However, as it proceeds toward higher supersonic speeds, the drag increases (even though the drag coefficient may show a decrease). "
Source: history.nasa.gov/SP-367/chapt5.htm
Also, in the video, I never said anything about if there is a pressure build up in front of the object.
Ваши визуализации всяких физических процессов и их толкование дали мне больше понимания, чем уроки по физике в школе 😁👍
Thanks. Now I understand the sonic boom effect for the first time. Great job.
Thanks.
Hadouken 🔥
@@MauryaEducation go fk urself
~holds back~
~waits a second~
~fowards and punchs~
Sonic boom
You guys have no idea how much help i got from your videos for my exams.
I am glad my videos have been helpful.
I gotta say: the shout-outs the science content creator community has been doing for each other is a welcome sight. I've been watching and following all of you for A WHILE, and to see this solidarity playing out makes me happy beyond description. Keep being awesome, guys!
Love it! Great tunes too!
Loved the visuals. Explained everything awesome
Thanks.
Stayed for the metal
I love your voice and explanation. Been following this channel for about 2 years now!
Thanks! The voice is that of my friend, Kira Vincent.
the entire work is consistent. Kira, eugene and oþhers are born for these works. Kira is awsome.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky @Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky you explained a number of things incorrectly in this video and are spreading some very large and problematic misunderstandings.
The drag force DOES NOT decrease passed the speed of sound, the drag COEFFICIENT does, which is a tool used for analyzing behavior of an object but decreasing drag coefficient DOES NOT mean decreasing the drag itself as the drag coefficient is inversely proportional to the square of the velocity. So at double the speed the drag coefficient would have to decrease by a factor of four to get the SAME net drag, and the drag coefficient does NOT decrease that much passed Mach 1.
Second you are entirely incorrect in saying that there is no pressure build up in front of the object, there definitely is, it is called the bow shock and anything traveling faster than Mach 1 will have a bow shock, a large pressure spike in front of the object. Your animation only shows what is known as the oblique shock that travels out behind the object but does NOT show how the pressure in front builds up with a bow shock!!!
AkiraR, what I said in the video is correct and what you are saying is also correct. The following quote is from NASA’s website: "Once past the transonic regime, the drag coefficient and the drag decreases, and less thrust is required to fly supersonically. However, as it proceeds toward higher supersonic speeds, the drag increases (even though the drag coefficient may show a decrease). "
Source: history.nasa.gov/SP-367/chapt5.htm
Also, in the video, I never said anything about if there is a pressure build up in front of the object.
Another beautiful video! Thank you.
I am glad you liked my video. Thanks.
I like this new format. Exciting.
So if you travel exactly the speed of sound, for how long can you 'build up' the high pressure in front?
Is there some limit after which air starts leaking supersonically/liquefies or something?
It heats up until the speed of sound in it matches.
So yes, it basically just leaks.
I like the voice. I also like the music choice. The work is consistent. You are all born for this. I wish you the best.
Thanks. The voice is that of my friend, Kira Vincent.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky collaboration is success. Keep going.
I love these videos. Great visuals
Thanks for the compliments.
Brilliant, well-explained animations. You guys are becoming a benchmark for what I expect good visual representation of a physical phenomenon should look like.
Thanks for the compliments.
Amazing video ❤️❤️
Thank you 😊
Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.
Thanks for the video Eugene..You are a gem 💎 of Knowledgeable content
Thanks.
безумно благодарен вам за русские субтитры, это один из важнейших плюсов канала на мой взгляд 😌
As the other comments are suggesting: this channel is GOLD. It's wonderful that you put these on UA-cam. Thank you.
Thanks for the compliment.
The most clear explanation (and visual) of shockwave. Finally!
Thanks. I am glad you liked my explanation.
Thank you so much! This helps it all make much more sense. Excellent teaching per unit time. :D
Thanks.
Always love your videos!
Thanks.
Wow.great visualization as always. Thanks you are back. Trust me, very often, I keep searching your channel for the new content. Very delighted to see your new.video. thanks a ton man . Stay blessed always 🌺👍
Thanks.
I loved this one, reminds me of an artillery round fired and diffusing or lensing light at its tip, exactly what u are describing. Thank u my son really understood the visuals.
How beautiful!
Eugene, you truly make some of the best physics videos on the internet. Thank you for helping me through some of my classes :)
Thanks for the compliments. I am glad my videos are helpful.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky @Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky you explained a number of things incorrectly in this video and are spreading some very large and problematic misunderstandings.
The drag force DOES NOT decrease passed the speed of sound, the drag COEFFICIENT does, which is a tool used for analyzing behavior of an object but decreasing drag coefficient DOES NOT mean decreasing the drag itself as the drag coefficient is inversely proportional to the square of the velocity. So at double the speed the drag coefficient would have to decrease by a factor of four to get the SAME net drag, and the drag coefficient does NOT decrease that much passed Mach 1.
Second you are entirely incorrect in saying that there is no pressure build up in front of the object, there definitely is, it is called the bow shock and anything traveling faster than Mach 1 will have a bow shock, a large pressure spike in front of the object. Your animation only shows what is known as the oblique shock that travels out behind the object but does NOT show how the pressure in front builds up with a bow shock!!!
AkiraR, what I said in the video is correct and what you are saying is also correct. The following quote is from NASA’s website: "Once past the transonic regime, the drag coefficient and the drag decreases, and less thrust is required to fly supersonically. However, as it proceeds toward higher supersonic speeds, the drag increases (even though the drag coefficient may show a decrease). "
Source: history.nasa.gov/SP-367/chapt5.htm
Also, in the video, I never said anything about if there is a pressure build up in front of the object.
I thought it was gonna be a meme about that Sonic show
That MUSIC!!! *YESS!!!!*
Möttööhl!
Is this Touhou!? I need answers!
@@Gospel-xm7vd I don't have a clue who it is.
This is such an excellent video. I've always had trouble visualising this!
Thanks.
Beautifully illustrated 👍❤
Thanks for the compliment.
I’ve always wondered what a sonic boom would be like in water considering that water being a liquid doesn’t compress... or least not in the same way gas does.
It does, every material can compress. It just has takes more energy to compress. Liquid has a higher density than gas, so sound waves can travel faster, at a higher energy cost.
@@leomadero562 though it compresses very little. If you put 10,000 atmospheres of pressure on a sample of water, its volume will still go down less than half a percent.
So in 3d wave having spherical wavefront forms cones while sonic boom
Yes, I am just showing a 2D cross section. Thanks.
@@MauryaEducation stop promoting your own channel in the comments. It's obnoxious, and unrelated.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky @Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky you explained a number of things incorrectly in this video and are spreading some very large and problematic misunderstandings.
The drag force DOES NOT decrease passed the speed of sound, the drag COEFFICIENT does, which is a tool used for analyzing behavior of an object but decreasing drag coefficient DOES NOT mean decreasing the drag itself as the drag coefficient is inversely proportional to the square of the velocity. So at double the speed the drag coefficient would have to decrease by a factor of four to get the SAME net drag, and the drag coefficient does NOT decrease that much passed Mach 1.
Second you are entirely incorrect in saying that there is no pressure build up in front of the object, there definitely is, it is called the bow shock and anything traveling faster than Mach 1 will have a bow shock, a large pressure spike in front of the object. Your animation only shows what is known as the oblique shock that travels out behind the object but does NOT show how the pressure in front builds up with a bow shock!!!
AkiraR, what I said in the video is correct and what you are saying is also correct. The following quote is from NASA’s website: "Once past the transonic regime, the drag coefficient and the drag decreases, and less thrust is required to fly supersonically. However, as it proceeds toward higher supersonic speeds, the drag increases (even though the drag coefficient may show a decrease). "
Source: history.nasa.gov/SP-367/chapt5.htm
Also, in the video, I never said anything about if there is a pressure build up in front of the object.
@@Legitgaming838 huh??
Awesome visualisation!
Thanks.
Excellent explanation... easy to understand, especially with your graphics. Thanks! 👍 🇦🇺
Thanks.
Really neat seeing the boundary conditions visualization versus the simple not so accurate or even precise seems 2D or maybe 3D representations of waves, fields, phonons and/or photons with or without time changes.
Polarization is something that I still need to confidently grasp accurately since seems is explained without clear graphical representations of the quantitative data well in most examples. Amazes me how properties of materials data isn't well detailed either when dealing with the EMS, when comes to the range of polarization with the thermal, electric, magnetic and I guess generically speaking optical properties.
Reminds me of like looking at an oscilloscope or spectrum analyzer detail where the components of the signals aren't all detailed in separate channels typically. Then like the missing polarization for the potential, current and frequency details. Seems there is way more to perceive with signals. Even the strange world of DC signals. Both get me highly concerned when dealing with human body electromagnetism and health concerns... especially when some know more malicious deadly ways that are like snipers poaching the more vulnerable and innocent compared to them. Pathetic how concealed and obstructed the science is detailed in that regards. I've been trying to super laymen explain on dewdefenseprojects blogspot.com
I show the polarization of electromagnetic waves in my video at ua-cam.com/video/8YkfEft4p-w/v-deo.html
Great animation, great video👍👍
Thanks for the compliment.
Fantabulous animations!
Thanks. I am glad you liked my animations.
Thanks for the video!!
Thanks.
Thanks Eugene
Thanks.
I was hoping for a much longer video. I like your other long videos.
There will be more long videos in the future. Thanks.
Let’s gooooo, I love all your videos
Thanks.
Thanks! I still watch all of your video over and over. I hope you will make the video about your idea about how to learn physics and math for general people thanks 😃😃
Thanks. I am glad you like my videos. I am not sure I understand your suggestion, since all my videos are about how to learn physics and math for general people. Thanks.
Dayum the real gem of the video is the prog rock jamming in the background 👌
the visualizations in your videos make me understand physics a lot better, one of kind channel on youtube for sure
Thanks for the compliments and I am glad that my videos are helpful.
The visualisation is so good!
Thanks.
I was expecting the Guile theme, from Street Fighter 2, as the background music.
Thank you! This finally explained sonic boom to me.
I am glad my video was helpful. Thanks.
What a great video!
Thanks.
great video!
Thanks.
Great explanation
Thanks.
Makes me wonder if a torpedo can achieve this feat in the future
Ones that burn fuel of some sort can redirect exhaust gases to the nose and out thru holes or behind a shielding cone in the front. This reduces hydrodynamic drag as the gases envelop the torpedo. They are essentially underwater rockets. Though not ~ 3600 mph as sound travels in water, 200 to 250 mph is still pretty damn fast. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superkavitierender_Unterwasserlaufk%C3%B6rper .. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VA-111_Shkval
It takes so much thrust and energy that it's pointless, you're much better off making a rocket capable of flying just above the surface
Awesome. Thank You!!
Thanks.
Good Job!
Thanks!
My brain can not comprehend this simple explanation.
cool video! very good work!
Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.
That's a really good sonic boomer
It could be more interesting to see this with the acceleration of the object, to see what happens when it something reach the speed of sound and when it surpasses it.
This is awesome
Thanks.
This is the sort of video you'd watch in class but it's still interesting to watch
Dang, this is my favourite physics channel!
Thanks. I am glad to hear that.
Your favourite physics youtuber's favourite physics youtuber
yes, your channel is a treasure. I am really greedy at hoping for more content, longer, and more often. But stay safe and you have my support.
I also have a question; can there be a sonic boom inside a solid?!!!
Thanks.
Thank you for sharing and visualizing prescious information.
Beyond my brain capacity, but your contents always amuse me 👍
Thanks.
what is this sick metal in the background lmao
The song is Double_Helix from the free UA-cam audio library.
These are killer visualisation
Thanks.
Again a good intuitive video but a rather short one tbh !
Excellent
Thank you
Thanks.
Your channel is quite superlative!!!!!!
Thanks for the compliment.
animations of pressure waves really makes it easier to understand
Eugene youve done it again
Thanks.
So... that means Meltryllis breaks the sound barrier everytime she uses her Noble Phantasm. Cool!
Wow. This is so cool.
Thanks.
thanks for not dragging (see what i did there?) this out for 20 minutes!=)
Thank you !
You are welcome and thanks.
Ohhhhh, that's why the Sonic's cartoon is called Sonic Boom. Neat :D
The background music was nice👌
Nice music
Awesome 🔥🔥🔥
Thanks.
This is useful context for studying transmedium UAP's.
Amazing
Thanks.
Awesome!
Thanks.
Please make a video explaining why is it that electromagnetic waves travel slower in water thanks
Short video, but very concise! By the way, how much force for unit area would the drag generate?
thank you
You are welcome and thanks.
Can't wait to see a super sonic submarine
missile in water probably
not long; still much learned
very cool
awesome!
Thanks.
Great vdo
Thanks.
What an animation!! 🔥
As an aeronautical student....hats off
Thanks. Glad you liked my animation.
Explained shortly but concisely.
Thanks.
My mentor ! will you make a video on earthquakes in future? A best visual video ever!
Maybe. I will add that to my list of topics for future videos. Thanks.
@@EugeneKhutoryansky @Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky you explained a number of things incorrectly in this video and are spreading some very large and problematic misunderstandings.
The drag force DOES NOT decrease passed the speed of sound, the drag COEFFICIENT does, which is a tool used for analyzing behavior of an object but decreasing drag coefficient DOES NOT mean decreasing the drag itself as the drag coefficient is inversely proportional to the square of the velocity. So at double the speed the drag coefficient would have to decrease by a factor of four to get the SAME net drag, and the drag coefficient does NOT decrease that much passed Mach 1.
Second you are entirely incorrect in saying that there is no pressure build up in front of the object, there definitely is, it is called the bow shock and anything traveling faster than Mach 1 will have a bow shock, a large pressure spike in front of the object. Your animation only shows what is known as the oblique shock that travels out behind the object but does NOT show how the pressure in front builds up with a bow shock!!!
AkiraR, what I said in the video is correct and what you are saying is also correct. The following quote is from NASA’s website: "Once past the transonic regime, the drag coefficient and the drag decreases, and less thrust is required to fly supersonically. However, as it proceeds toward higher supersonic speeds, the drag increases (even though the drag coefficient may show a decrease). "
Source: history.nasa.gov/SP-367/chapt5.htm
Also, in the video, I never said anything about if there is a pressure build up in front of the object.
I still like the longer videos better but short videos like this make me stop thinking the channel is dead
My previous video was only two weeks ago.
please do a video wich visualizes the curvature of space-time and quantum gravity fields
amazing videos I'm addicted to them even tho I don't know much about physics and science