That's a lot of Russia ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Also, I didn't really count all the deaths (243) in No Russian in the video but if you want to include it, the total would jump from 392 to 630...
White phos can be used on battlefields to make smoke screens, generate illumination, mark targets or burn bunkers and buildings. Because it has legal uses, white phosphorus is not banned as a chemical weapon under international conventions so technically not totally banned
John 3:16-21 King James Version 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. 17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. 18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. 20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. 21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
@@DHunter_47 This is the kind of person that goes to hell when they die. You are a prime example of a "christian" that tries to force christianity onto others.
People during peace time: "Ok, let's make rules so war is as moral as possible" People during war time: "Hippity hoppity, look at my war crime recordity"
@@avidmomokayoitsumareader Yeah, if you hit the baby with it it'll likely kill it on impact. If it exploded near the baby, it'd likely kill it due to, for a human baby, a flashbang explosion is like, the size of you, I believe, so it's gonna cause some harm. *_and all around why would you use any military equipment on a fucking child, let alone one that's born like 5 months ago-_*
The last game (Modern Warfare)was way too much "war is hell" and, in my opinion, and also way too much "Russia is a warmonger warcriminal" so everything makes sense... And there is also the fact that MW introduces islamist terrorism and non-state forces like guerrillas so...
@@979aljm they say that in Bale's bio in spec ops,(spetsnaz operator in mw) he served under Barkov for 6 years and then filed a complaint to Moscow saying how cruel Barkov was to civilians
@@balashibuyeeter2704 I love how this part gets ignored by most youtubers. But to their credit, I don’t really have an explanation as why Barkov was only disavowed after his death, even with complaints from allied soldiers denouncing his actions in the AO, like he must’ve had the Russian govnt on payroll or insurance policy or something like that...
Not really, you can kill whoever you want if they are uniformed combatants and you do it in your initial sweep and they don’t make obvious signs of surrender
@@lukedaduke3533 That only applies if you're formally at war with whatever country they're representing. If it's a proxy war and you're not formally at war with them then you can only kill them in self-defence.
@@Frikgeek yeah well in that case its widely ignored, no one from any nations army is going to take a chance to scream at wounded soldier who is still armed to surrender, they're just gonna pop him in the head.
Also take into account that being a soldier on a battlefield surrounded by wounded-but-not-dead soldiers has to be terrifying. Just double tap them, it’s the smart thing to do for the well being of you and everyone on your side
Correction about the claymores, they fall under legal usage since they are non conventional and are timed to about 12 hours if I recall, after which they become inactive Edit: oh and WP is a loophole since it's purpose is a smoke screen and the lethality is a by-product, it's weird
@@heliveruscalion9124 It's been used similarly in Iraq and Afghanistan, thing is they can pull the excuse of smoke coverage and cannot be condemned, it's a fucked loophole
They do not, Claymores are yet another exploitation of a loophole by the US. As they can be used as mines via tripping wire but also manually detonated, the US is like "this is absolutely not a mine, you should not use it like that" and kind of talks their way out of te Ottawa conventions. Not that they would care about those, anyway.
@@TheIIIJulianIII the international laws state that mines which are Undetectable by conventional means, have no timer or kill switch, or are designed to cause maximum injury via shrapnel are banned. Obviously paraphrased for the sake of clarity but the Claymore is a non conventional tripwire or laser meaning it cannot be hidden below ground, has a kill timer built, and is designed to kill instantly. Ergo, it is legal under the conventions of war
The claymore actually depends on what country is utilising it really, like yeah US found their loophole so they can use that shit but in Australia we aren’t allowed to use the claymore as means of a trip mine. The Claymore is only to be used with manual detonation connected by wire to a clacker
It's only killing injured combatants AFTER the team has moved past the injured. Failing to render aid/executing them after the forces have moved past is a warcrime.
@@nobodyherepal3292 If there's an injured enemy soldier on the ground who can still fight back or live to fight back, it's beneficial to you to take them out if they have a chance of being extracted to recover from their wounds. That's just war.
@@chad7430 since when? By that logic, POWs shouldn’t be a thing, because “oh it’s just beneficial to kill them rather than render aid and capture them” Also, want the whole point of modern fire arms something like (in the words of Eugene Stoner) “It’s just as useful to maim and injury the enemy as it is to kill him. He can’t contribute to battle regardless”.
@@jamescrab4110 Hey quick question, which is better? Papa John's or Domino's. I dont get pizza that much so I dont know what to pick. Edit: wait, nvm they were both closed for the night. I'll just get one from a local shop if I can find one. Edit 2: I thought about it and decided to get a steak at a restaurant. Dont worry, I'm getting take-out. 😁
Fun fact: The Zakhaev International Airport was actually based upon the real-life Sheremetyevo International Airport instead of Domodedovo in Moscow. The Russian capital has 3 international airports as I recall, those two and Vnukovo. Not too far from the reality as the new interim Ultranationalist government could have renamed Sheremetyevo into Zakhaev International Airport by the time MW2 is set in.
So... disguising as an ally is against the rules. Killing an enemy spy, who is disguised as your forces, is also against the rules. Rules are confusing.
@@kurousagi8155 But what about if you try kill a spy, while disguised as the enemy, but the spy was also disguised as the enemy, and you both use extravagant and cartoonish weapons with little to no success?
I think the briefing cutscene of "No Fighting In The War Room" was more of an attempted genocide rather than an actual genocide. The computer was only simulating the scenario of what will happen if the missiles reached the U.S.
This is sadly true. The trials at the end of the second world War left many war criminals both on the allied and axis sides unjudged or unpunished, particularly Winston Churchill, who ordered and over saw horrible things on all fronts.
Intentionally inducing your enemies to breach international war laws at the expense of your own peoples' lives is a fuckedup but sadly effective tactic when you are fighting a guerrilla warfare against a stronger enemy. When you fake surrender, fake death, fake injury, rig women and children with explosives, hide amongst unarmed villagers for a better chance to ambush convoys, you send your opponent into an endless paranoia since they couldn't tell civis from hiding combatants. This not only weaken the outsiders' overall perception and combat effectiveness, but also makes the already inevitable innocent deaths happen much more often, which in turn makes the local despise the outsiders even more. Unless you can just exterminate the entire local population like the Mongols did, a conflict like this is a lost cause for the outsider no matter how strong it is. British Empire, Nazi Germany, USA, USSR, the four biggest giants of the 19th and 20th century all experienced this first hand.
Yea, there are A LOT of misconceptions here. The vast majority of "crimes" committed aren't even crimes..... I made a large essay-of-a-comment explaining this in more detail, but I think this video is really just supposed to be a "fun/joke" thing.
For killing the injured enemies, it depends on how injured they are imo. Like for example if someone got shot in the arm and you kill them, that can be a war crime since they couldve survived. But if someone has their limbs blown off and were gonna die of blood loss anyway and you kill them, that shouldn't be a war crime since you are ending their suffering. Just wanted to throw that out there lol.
Isn't war in it of itself a crime in general? I mean, the whole point of war is laying waste to your enemy to achieve a goal, whether it be obtaining land, resources, combating an opposing ideology, or committing genocide.
Well yeah. Wars these days are less about boots on ground fighting and more about distance fighting, whether from remote attacks with UAVs or cyber attacks. That just wouldn't make for a good COD game. The Geneva Convention, which outlined pretty much all war crimes, met after WW1 and WW2. Both wars had atrocities that needed to be banned. The creation of the United Nations after WW2 helped enforce these changes. Prior to the Geneva Convention (they also met long before WW1 but it's typically referred to after WW1/2), what would be considered a war crime today might not have been before. Long story short, you can't militarize schools, hospitals, or churches, and you can only kill active combatants.
You forgot some war-crimes committed in Cod 4. In Sins of The Father, the SAS and loyalists disguised themselves as ultranationalists. And in Heat, Price says the ultrantionalists will be looking for Al-Asad, to what Gaz replies "or what's left of him". Which means that not only they dismembered Al-Asad corpse, but also they were getting rid of the evidence
I feel like the whole Injured Enemy thing is more of mercy killing I mean seriously just take a look at when Shepherd napalmed his own guys Would you rather burn to death or have your enemy pop you quick?
Since there were Russians staging at the WW2 memorial in MW2 that'd also be a war crime in the same way militarizing a church is a war crime. You could also argue the US committed a war crime by shooting the shit outta the WW2 memorial thus destroying a cultural site but I think it'd slide since it's Americans destroying an American cultural site.
If you listen to the radio transmissions, the U.S U.S military may have straight up leveled the Lincoln Memorial. Not to mention the American cultural artifacts stored in the museum's the military planned to raze during Hammerdown.
"Killing Injured Enemies" only applies to enemies that have already been deemed non-threats i.e. disarmed, secured and/or moved. While still in combat, and looking at the man you just shot, unless they throw up their arms or their weapon away, they're still threats and need to be dealt with, lest you wind up with a bullet in your back.
This *does* apply to Enemies that have already been injured. Finding injured enemies and shooting them is a big no no. If they pull a gun and attempt to attack, however, they're fair game. Self-Defense isn't a war crime, but as long as other countries are playing by the rules, you shouldn't have to fight while injured.
I love the idea of Gaz just casually watching civies getting executed and only killing the assailant once he turns his gun on Gaz. Just stand by and waiting.
In a combat situation if I’m not mistaken when shooting an enemy target you can shoot to make sure he is down then clear the threat, once you pass him, you can’t turn around and shoot, that is a war crime, but maybe double tapping a solider as you walk up to make sure he is dead isn’t, since he still has access to his weapon and can still be a threat so either A) clear the firearm and move on or B) double tap him to make sure he is down. And move forward. And let’s say if you “cleared” him but then be like hmm I don’t know, 180 then double tap, that is a war crime. I think that’s the standard rules of engagement in a battlefield if I am not mistaken. Like the case of shepherd at 6:50 he pretended to be hurt and attacked.
For “Killing Injured Enemy”, if someone poses a threat to you and then you’re supposed to eliminate the threat. Also with that scene on the security cameras, they’re making sure that threats are dead. If the enemy was surrendering, then he/she was killed then I could see that. Also, I’m sorry if the explanation is bad, my native tongue is English and I’m not even good at that.
Just to be clear someone could mistake this is a guy was shot in the arm but still trying to fight that’s OK if a guy was shot in the arm and tried to Leave the battlefield and he still shot them that’s a war crime
@@odstman2984 Not really, killing an enemy who is fleeing / is attacking you / or is threatening the lives of others is completely legal, what would be illegal is to kill surrendered enemies / badly wounded / during a truce.
@@odstman2984 Killing enemies in self-defense or in defense of your friends is not bad, killing fleeing enemies may seem cruel but it is likely that those enemies that are escaping will return to the enemy ranks and be a threat later, even so I agree in that the act of killing another person is already horrible in itself, but if they want to survive they can surrender whenever they want.
Well yes but one in air combat what an enemy planes destroyed and they jump out pull the parachute they are defenseless but going back to kill The pilot that’s a war crime when it be the same for someone on the ground trying to run
No such thing as a war crime as long as your the victor. Also I like how you don't tally the Dog, something like that has to be done, it's just sad a good boy was a bad boy.
Most of the clips are wrong. /Killing defendless enemy' first of all he was patroling so its not called defendless because he is not good at his job. If he patroled good he wouldnt get killed
5:45 right before shepherd’s men kill ghost and roach you can hear 2 guys killing archer and the other dude who provided sniper fire for you during the mission so that would be another killing allies crime.
That's a lot of Russia ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Also, I didn't really count all the deaths (243) in No Russian in the video but if you want to include it, the total would jump from 392 to 630...
White phos can be used on battlefields to make smoke screens, generate illumination, mark targets or burn bunkers and buildings. Because it has legal uses, white phosphorus is not banned as a chemical weapon under international conventions so technically not totally banned
The War Crimes that you are charging them with is really irrelevant. It just does not seem clear with every note you put down.
@@Drew-v2f how did u not understand
@@Drew-v2f or were u talking about him
Wtf he is going to grow up a lil bih he can't even take a flashbang 13:36
"It's not breaking the Geneva Convention if no one lives to tell the tale."
-Said every soldier to commit a war crime probably
*exceutes civies
“No one will notice, if there’s no one to notice...”
*proceeds to fire on allies that just witnessed that
"It's not a war crime if we win😉"
@@basedbattledroid3507 no is definitely still is
@@GeorgeMitchell10 it's a joke but ofc it is...unless nobody sees you doing it
@@GeorgeMitchell10 tell that to the Americans
The new Modern Warfare said, "Geneva Suggestions"
Geneva Conversation? More Like A Suggestion
@@Zucchi_Zuru "Geneva? Where do you think you are sergeant?"
Original
Zan clan?
Hahahahhh
I love how almost every war crime committed by the SAS is committed by Price.
Price is price
What's the SAS gonna do? Say no to his bitchin' chops?
For Price is just the Geneva Checklist.
@@HausAbendrot yes, that’s kind of what their job is suppose to be (then again this is a video game)
So a war respecting war rules is: 1 vs 1 only sniper rust no explosives.
COD: brings lmg to a sniper fight
Throwing knives only
Rust or shipment only
Nuketown UAV always on, DSR or Balista
Time unlimited, score limit 45
"This is a goddamn war crime"
*immediately commits 3 war crimes*
John 3:16-21
King James Version
16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.
21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.
@@DHunter_47 piss off spambot
@@DHunter_47 This is the kind of person that goes to hell when they die. You are a prime example of a "christian" that tries to force christianity onto others.
@@DHunter_47 I'm not falling for that
@@yapflipthegrunt4687 Hes going to hell for copy pasting john 316???/
Killing defenseless enemies only means to those who are injured or have surrendered not those who are unaware of a situation like the stealth kills
I was about to say because their not gonna be defenceless when they have a assault rifle and notice you walking around their base
If they are armed then they are not defenseless
Yes
they're not defenseless if you put a gun next to their bodies
Also he seemed to count the sniper section as an unarmed combatant kill... dude, it’s an assassination mission
I love how you went through picadilli without trying to save anyone
Love?
@@chillbill1139 Yes.
You are sick
@@hernanarauz1610 shit map anyway
He forget to count the way i play, i try to kill as many civilians in the crossfire as i can without the ai punishing me
People during peace time: "Ok, let's make rules so war is as moral as possible"
People during war time: "Hippity hoppity, look at my war crime recordity"
p e e c e
War crimes? More like: Fun times!
@Samuel Khurram I see.
Hm I woulda went with “hippity hoppity look at my war crime atrocity” since it rhymes better but too late now lmfao
@@noahsadler6632 Hah, too bad you are more creative than me, i just lazily raped language with "recordity".
13:36 flashbang baby , laughed for a full 30 seconds there XD
FBI: INTRESTING
Is a flashbang at point blank enough to kill a baby?
@@avidmomokayoitsumareader technically yh it is a explosion
@@avidmomokayoitsumareader I'm pretty sure flashbangs have killed children before.
@@avidmomokayoitsumareader Yeah, if you hit the baby with it it'll likely kill it on impact. If it exploded near the baby, it'd likely kill it due to, for a human baby, a flashbang explosion is like, the size of you, I believe, so it's gonna cause some harm.
*_and all around why would you use any military equipment on a fucking child, let alone one that's born like 5 months ago-_*
At this point war crimes is just a checklist for Call of Duty.
Yeap and this is why MW2019 campaign pretty meh. At least before it was, if not serving the plot (No Russian) at least looked cool and not a cliche
Feel like every FPS games has us commuting war crimes. We just don’t know it because we’re not over here reading up on the Geneva Conventions.
They haven’t violated, “no shooting down ejected pilots,” yet, so I’m still waiting on that.
Yerp
I like how if you don't count No Russian, the number of war crimes increases geometrically with each game in the series.
The last game (Modern Warfare)was way too much "war is hell" and, in my opinion, and also way too much "Russia is a warmonger warcriminal" so everything makes sense...
And there is also the fact that MW introduces islamist terrorism and non-state forces like guerrillas so...
@@979aljm barkov was a russian general gone rogue. the russian government was also against barkov. the russians were also good guys in the armistice.
@@979aljm they say that in Bale's bio in spec ops,(spetsnaz operator in mw) he served under Barkov for 6 years and then filed a complaint to Moscow saying how cruel Barkov was to civilians
@@balashibuyeeter2704 I love how this part gets ignored by most youtubers. But to their credit, I don’t really have an explanation as why Barkov was only disavowed after his death, even with complaints from allied soldiers denouncing his actions in the AO, like he must’ve had the Russian govnt on payroll or insurance policy or something like that...
Did he count the side op missions?
I love how “flash bang baby” managed to make it into this video 😂
I finally found it
Its oddly specific
"Seriously?" *Booted*
"we get dirty so they get dirty so he gets dirty so the other guy gets dirty, and the civilians get shot"
so we did some dirty things to him
We get dirty, so the world stays dirty. That’s the mission
Nooooooooooo!!!!!!!!
Name a more iconic moment than "Civilians killed x243"
When u realize killing enemies that aren’t trying to kill u is a war crime
Every cod game:😬🤫
Not really, you can kill whoever you want if they are uniformed combatants and you do it in your initial sweep and they don’t make obvious signs of surrender
@@lukedaduke3533 That only applies if you're formally at war with whatever country they're representing. If it's a proxy war and you're not formally at war with them then you can only kill them in self-defence.
@@Frikgeek yeah well in that case its widely ignored, no one from any nations army is going to take a chance to scream at wounded soldier who is still armed to surrender, they're just gonna pop him in the head.
Also take into account that being a soldier on a battlefield surrounded by wounded-but-not-dead soldiers has to be terrifying. Just double tap them, it’s the smart thing to do for the well being of you and everyone on your side
Correction about the claymores, they fall under legal usage since they are non conventional and are timed to about 12 hours if I recall, after which they become inactive
Edit: oh and WP is a loophole since it's purpose is a smoke screen and the lethality is a by-product, it's weird
Yeah, but that use of white phosphorous is illegal, since it was used as an incendiary/explosive
@@heliveruscalion9124 It's been used similarly in Iraq and Afghanistan, thing is they can pull the excuse of smoke coverage and cannot be condemned, it's a fucked loophole
They do not, Claymores are yet another exploitation of a loophole by the US. As they can be used as mines via tripping wire but also manually detonated, the US is like "this is absolutely not a mine, you should not use it like that" and kind of talks their way out of te Ottawa conventions. Not that they would care about those, anyway.
@@TheIIIJulianIII the international laws state that mines which are Undetectable by conventional means, have no timer or kill switch, or are designed to cause maximum injury via shrapnel are banned. Obviously paraphrased for the sake of clarity but the Claymore is a non conventional tripwire or laser meaning it cannot be hidden below ground, has a kill timer built, and is designed to kill instantly. Ergo, it is legal under the conventions of war
The claymore actually depends on what country is utilising it really, like yeah US found their loophole so they can use that shit but in Australia we aren’t allowed to use the claymore as means of a trip mine. The Claymore is only to be used with manual detonation connected by wire to a clacker
It's only killing injured combatants AFTER the team has moved past the injured. Failing to render aid/executing them after the forces have moved past is a warcrime.
Wait....you can still execute wounded before force move on legally? WTF?
@@nobodyherepal3292 It's frowned upon, and highly situational, but yes.
@@jonathanweaver5310 yikes.....
@@nobodyherepal3292 If there's an injured enemy soldier on the ground who can still fight back or live to fight back, it's beneficial to you to take them out if they have a chance of being extracted to recover from their wounds. That's just war.
@@chad7430 since when?
By that logic, POWs shouldn’t be a thing, because “oh it’s just beneficial to kill them rather than render aid and capture them”
Also, want the whole point of modern fire arms something like (in the words of Eugene Stoner) “It’s just as useful to maim and injury the enemy as it is to kill him. He can’t contribute to battle regardless”.
The "technically not" part may be one of the worst deaths ever
Just waiting in the vacuum of space to die for days knowing no one will save you
Actually, you die quickly in space. The lack of air, how cold it is, and the pressure help to make a death in space fairly quick
@@whoknows9752 actually you lose heat quite slowly in a vacuum.
@@seekingabsolution1907 is it because there isnt a lot of particles for the energy(heat) to diffuse to?
NATO : " you can't commit war crimes!"
Every yugoslav country : "says who?"
NATO committed warcrimes and bombings in Yugoslavia you dumbass
It should go more like
NATIO: “You can’t commit war crimes!“
Every Yugoslav country: “Funny you out of everyone here is saying that.”
If your enemy commits war crimes, why not join in on the fun!@@jamescrab4110
@@jamescrab4110 Hey quick question, which is better? Papa John's or Domino's. I dont get pizza that much so I dont know what to pick.
Edit: wait, nvm they were both closed for the night. I'll just get one from a local shop if I can find one.
Edit 2: I thought about it and decided to get a steak at a restaurant. Dont worry, I'm getting take-out. 😁
So cod campaigns are basically a big ol’ “who can perform these war crimes better against each other” type of deal
Daaamn, CoD:MW3 remastered is gonna be da shizznitz!
I’m not ready for soap, yuri, sandman, grinch and truck to die in 4K
@@wastedoxys I am :3
@@wastedoxys nooooo
@@guccygoose383 wdym?
@@soapmactavish5355 I get to watch them die twice🌚
I knew modern warfare 2019 would basically have 100 war crimes in every mission.
S.A.S: *Does anything.*
Geneva convention: You're not supposed to do that!
Since when does Shepherd care about danger close
*Shoots burnt soldiers*
So there are about 600 war crimes in the MW series alone, yet you can't use "offensive language" in multiplayer in a 18+ game
"B-b-bu-but our crimes are fictional! Offensive words might hurt somebody!"
They're just trying to get kudos from an audience that stopped caring about mature games many years ago.
Fun fact: The Zakhaev International Airport was actually based upon the real-life Sheremetyevo International Airport instead of Domodedovo in Moscow. The Russian capital has 3 international airports as I recall, those two and Vnukovo. Not too far from the reality as the new interim Ultranationalist government could have renamed Sheremetyevo into Zakhaev International Airport by the time MW2 is set in.
mw2 reenacters: interesting
Well I’m never going there
@@commandowalperson3113 Noone is asking you to.
So... disguising as an ally is against the rules. Killing an enemy spy, who is disguised as your forces, is also against the rules.
Rules are confusing.
Agent Coxack it’s actually not illegal to kill an enemy spy who is disguised as your own forces. It’s a perfectly legal.
@@kurousagi8155 But what about if you try kill a spy, while disguised as the enemy, but the spy was also disguised as the enemy, and you both use extravagant and cartoonish weapons with little to no success?
@@agentcoxack7368 - Then that's a Spy Vs Spy comic
@@agentcoxack7368 some french dude: I am the spy
So is warfare warfare is confusing
I think the briefing cutscene of "No Fighting In The War Room" was more of an attempted genocide rather than an actual genocide. The computer was only simulating the scenario of what will happen if the missiles reached the U.S.
Pretty sure Al-Qatala set a new CoD all time record.
They were in one game and still committed the most crimes
11:50 But let’s be honest, Makarov REALLY had it coming...
wtf Makarov isn’t in MW 2019
I meant to say 11:35
@@akend4426 you can edit comments by clicking the three dots and then selecting "edit"
So is stealth basically a Warcrime in general?
Nah not really.
Lethal takedowns are legal imo unless the enemy's knocked unconscious or disarmed.
@@YunyunUnion were you in the army or something you know a lot about war crimes
@@shadowkiller7510 he couldve studied about the science and rules of war.
@@shadowkiller7510 the Geneva Convention is open to everyone, you just need to surf the internet and look for the official document
@@YunyunUnion did you already count the side ops missions before?
11:05 "attacking disarmed enemie"
The dude pulled out a gun and miss is not my fault that he had shitty aim
Remember, switching to your pistol is faster than re- hold on, he didn't have primary weapon.
@@lapikolko2 then knife tour enemy, as simple as that
@@overlycautiousstrategist3647 Remember, meleeing is illegal
@@lapikolko2 not really
@@ajkaylor8823 I'm kidding man
Always remember kids: It's only a warcrime if another country does it
*Only a war crime if you lose the war
Americans in Vietnam be like
This is sadly true. The trials at the end of the second world War left many war criminals both on the allied and axis sides unjudged or unpunished, particularly Winston Churchill, who ordered and over saw horrible things on all fronts.
Gotta love how there's progressively more as the series progresses.
The theft of chemical weapons in MW’s opening is misattributed. That’s Hadir and the revolutionaries.
Don’t quote me but I think it’s also revealed that hadir would end up being with al qatala the entire time but I don’t remember
Thank you very much, i needed this
Much obliged.
We all need a little war crime here and there
@@YunyunUnion yeah, screw those Geneva suggestions
@@YunyunUnion I agree
America be like
Intentionally inducing your enemies to breach international war laws at the expense of your own peoples' lives is a fuckedup but sadly effective tactic when you are fighting a guerrilla warfare against a stronger enemy. When you fake surrender, fake death, fake injury, rig women and children with explosives, hide amongst unarmed villagers for a better chance to ambush convoys, you send your opponent into an endless paranoia since they couldn't tell civis from hiding combatants. This not only weaken the outsiders' overall perception and combat effectiveness, but also makes the already inevitable innocent deaths happen much more often, which in turn makes the local despise the outsiders even more.
Unless you can just exterminate the entire local population like the Mongols did, a conflict like this is a lost cause for the outsider no matter how strong it is. British Empire, Nazi Germany, USA, USSR, the four biggest giants of the 19th and 20th century all experienced this first hand.
First thing that came to mind when I read this was Vietnam and the Me Lai Massacre
"But what about the Infinite War crimes?" I thought to myself. Then I realized, human rights don't apply to Martians.
18:05 "ok lets play social media roulette"
BA-
Not an offense, killing enemies who aren't self-aware is a crime
Yea, there are A LOT of misconceptions here. The vast majority of "crimes" committed aren't even crimes..... I made a large essay-of-a-comment explaining this in more detail, but I think this video is really just supposed to be a "fun/joke" thing.
For killing the injured enemies, it depends on how injured they are imo.
Like for example if someone got shot in the arm and you kill them, that can be a war crime since they couldve survived.
But if someone has their limbs blown off and were gonna die of blood loss anyway and you kill them, that shouldn't be a war crime since you are ending their suffering.
Just wanted to throw that out there lol.
And there's also the fact that if you shoot them in the leg they can still use a weapon
@@heliveruscalion9124 Yeah, therefore leading to killing a defenseless enemy. Which is a war crime.
@@ComicFan83 how is a wounded still fighting hostile an unarmed combatant?
@@heliveruscalion9124 oh wait im sorry im stupid lol
@@ComicFan83 lmao it's all good
One FSO crime skipped.
Killing defenceless enemy
*An FSO agent spots a wounded Inner Circle member and executes him after the plane crash*
Thanks for this, it’s kinda of terrifying to think about. Thanks for all the hard work!
“Everything we do is illegal”
"We get dirty, and the world stays clean."
“Killing unarmed combatant” dude had a ak around his waist
Isn't war in it of itself a crime in general? I mean, the whole point of war is laying waste to your enemy to achieve a goal, whether it be obtaining land, resources, combating an opposing ideology, or committing genocide.
Yes. It is a crime against peace
I was about to say some dumb shit but this is a youtube comment section and frankly, I dont feel like getting my throat slit while sleeping.
@@somerandommushroomhead1534 good choice
@@somerandommushroomhead1534 lol weak ass bitch
Well yeah. Wars these days are less about boots on ground fighting and more about distance fighting, whether from remote attacks with UAVs or cyber attacks. That just wouldn't make for a good COD game.
The Geneva Convention, which outlined pretty much all war crimes, met after WW1 and WW2. Both wars had atrocities that needed to be banned. The creation of the United Nations after WW2 helped enforce these changes. Prior to the Geneva Convention (they also met long before WW1 but it's typically referred to after WW1/2), what would be considered a war crime today might not have been before.
Long story short, you can't militarize schools, hospitals, or churches, and you can only kill active combatants.
"But where do we draw the line, sir?"
"You draw the line wherever you need it, Sergeant"
"We get dirty so the world stays clean"
- When you ask for how much cost?
13:37, imagine just sitting at the Geneva convention then some delegate is like... so is flashbanging a baby illegal?
You forgot some war-crimes committed in Cod 4.
In Sins of The Father, the SAS and loyalists disguised themselves as ultranationalists.
And in Heat, Price says the ultrantionalists will be looking for Al-Asad, to what Gaz replies "or what's left of him". Which means that not only they dismembered Al-Asad corpse, but also they were getting rid of the evidence
Or the "what's left of him" being a metaphor that they'd be looking for Al-Asad's corpse (which they probably just threw away)
13:04 you're pretty spot on with your understanding of proxy wars tbf
Destroying corpses is a warcrime?
*gordon freeman starts sweating*
s t a h p
d a r g h
n o
it's not a war crime if a door does it
@@Mate_Antal_Zoltan When it stuck, perhaps?
I feel like the whole Injured Enemy thing is more of mercy killing
I mean seriously just take a look at when Shepherd napalmed his own guys
Would you rather burn to death or have your enemy pop you quick?
Though, the napalm was also a crime.
@@seekingabsolution1907 White Phosphorus not napalm
Shit nvm my b I was thinking of the wrong modern warfare
Since there were Russians staging at the WW2 memorial in MW2 that'd also be a war crime in the same way militarizing a church is a war crime. You could also argue the US committed a war crime by shooting the shit outta the WW2 memorial thus destroying a cultural site but I think it'd slide since it's Americans destroying an American cultural site.
It’d still be a war crime which would give jail time purposely destroying your own memorials
If you listen to the radio transmissions, the U.S U.S military may have straight up leveled the Lincoln Memorial. Not to mention the American cultural artifacts stored in the museum's the military planned to raze during Hammerdown.
@@peter_griffin_69_epicmomen79 I'm pretty sure the mass of dead Russian troops, destroyed fuel trucks, destroyed BTRs and Mi28 would overrule that
14:39 Every glasses are bulletroof expect this one. 👍
Incident 4 on MW2 wouldn’t have counted as in the previous cutscene, Shepherd explains how Prisoner 627 (Price) was the only prisoner in the gulag.
Shooting is a warcrime now.
You know what breathing is a warcrime. Ahh rules, gotta love them.
"no one will know of the crime if you get rid of all the witnesses" - me and my friends talking about 9/11
The flag changing on detonation because Makarov was the responsable. 1:26 LOL !!!!
I've just realised that nearly half of the warcrimes in this video are from MW (2019) lol.
thanks to this i'm learning a *lot* more about war crimes than i expected
Take it with a large grain of salt though as I'm just having fun with these
The fact that the video is sped up made me laugh...
*i'm not insane i swear*
"Flashbang baby" is my new favorite Geneva Suggestion
Bro I wonder how badass it would be to remaster mw3
I died when he threw the flashbang in the crib with the baby 😂😂 13:35
Infinity ward really doesn't like dogs...
"Killing Injured Enemies" only applies to enemies that have already been deemed non-threats i.e. disarmed, secured and/or moved. While still in combat, and looking at the man you just shot, unless they throw up their arms or their weapon away, they're still threats and need to be dealt with, lest you wind up with a bullet in your back.
This *does* apply to Enemies that have already been injured. Finding injured enemies and shooting them is a big no no. If they pull a gun and attempt to attack, however, they're fair game. Self-Defense isn't a war crime, but as long as other countries are playing by the rules, you shouldn't have to fight while injured.
What if they tried to run
2:06 wait, that was alpha-6, not bravo
I love the idea of Gaz just casually watching civies getting executed and only killing the assailant once he turns his gun on Gaz. Just stand by and waiting.
Weren’t the fighters at 5:30 supposed to be packing cluster bombs? That would have been a war crime in and of itself
Only if you sign the Convention on Cluster Munitions. Which the United States and other nations like China and Russia have not.
Me: Watches a 22 minute video showing hundreds of war crimes
Also me: *only feels kinda bad when the dogs die*
The worst war crime of all...
Killing dogs
I mean, if a dogs job was to kill and it ran toward me, you bet your sweet cheeks I’m putting it down. Yeah dogs are cute but I want to live.
It's not a crime, it's people being pussies because muh pets
In a combat situation if I’m not mistaken when shooting an enemy target you can shoot to make sure he is down then clear the threat, once you pass him, you can’t turn around and shoot, that is a war crime, but maybe double tapping a solider as you walk up to make sure he is dead isn’t, since he still has access to his weapon and can still be a threat so either A) clear the firearm and move on or B) double tap him to make sure he is down.
And move forward. And let’s say if you “cleared” him but then be like hmm I don’t know, 180 then double tap, that is a war crime. I think that’s the standard rules of engagement in a battlefield if I am not mistaken.
Like the case of shepherd at 6:50 he pretended to be hurt and attacked.
For “Killing Injured Enemy”, if someone poses a threat to you and then you’re supposed to eliminate the threat.
Also with that scene on the security cameras, they’re making sure that threats are dead.
If the enemy was surrendering, then he/she was killed then I could see that.
Also, I’m sorry if the explanation is bad, my native tongue is English and I’m not even good at that.
Just to be clear someone could mistake this is a guy was shot in the arm but still trying to fight that’s OK if a guy was shot in the arm and tried to Leave the battlefield and he still shot them that’s a war crime
@@odstman2984
Not really, killing an enemy who is fleeing / is attacking you / or is threatening the lives of others is completely legal, what would be illegal is to kill surrendered enemies / badly wounded / during a truce.
@@condedooku9750 Still be a bitch thing to do even if you’re right
@@odstman2984 Killing enemies in self-defense or in defense of your friends is not bad, killing fleeing enemies may seem cruel but it is likely that those enemies that are escaping will return to the enemy ranks and be a threat later, even so I agree in that the act of killing another person is already horrible in itself, but if they want to survive they can surrender whenever they want.
Well yes but one in air combat what an enemy planes destroyed and they jump out pull the parachute they are defenseless but going back to kill The pilot that’s a war crime when it be the same for someone on the ground trying to run
2:32 why use the Ultranationalist flag to describe the (presumably) Loyalist government?
Killing Ghost should've been a war crime aswell
Yes it is. I thought I placed it in.
Will recheck again
Very helpful to know this thank you now I know that my hero’s are actual war criminals
No such thing as a war crime as long as your the victor.
Also I like how you don't tally the Dog, something like that has to be done, it's just sad a good boy was a bad boy.
crunchy glass [ASMR] the worst of all war crimes
15:29 forgot to add 'Asaulting and killing innocent russian soldier'
"Innocent"
"Russians didn't signed the Geneva Conventions, so it's not a warcrime to kill them"
-Every Waffen-SS Officer
call of duty
call of duty
call of duty
call od duty
call of duty
call of duty
13:36 "flashbang baby" ... So I can't punish my baby using flashbangs, goddamit wikihow
If your fighting makarov will “Executing injured personnel” Rule will apply to you?
So I guess we aren’t talking about “flash bang baby”?
Most of the clips are wrong. /Killing defendless enemy' first of all he was patroling so its not called defendless because he is not good at his job. If he patroled good he wouldnt get killed
I would at least give them The chance of living by knock them out pretty hard
@@odstman2984 u also can kill someone one if you hit them pretty hard on their head
@@outlawhellhound3520 I mean it’s better than shooting the guy in the back of the head
3:00 the reason why they do that so they can make sure if the enemies are dead and make him not interfere with the mission
How is killing an armed guard killing a "Defenseless enemy"? Or were none of the guards armed?
OP is a moron
You forget that one russian soldier stealing food from the fridge, that's inhumane!
* breathe *
*WAR CRIME*
11:48 welcome to dubái
6:42 These enemies die even if you don't shoot them. I'm not sure if "putting out of misery" is a concept the Geneva Convention recognizes.
Alex: This is a goddamn war crime
Barkov: you bet your sweet bippy it is
5:45 right before shepherd’s men kill ghost and roach you can hear 2 guys killing archer and the other dude who provided sniper fire for you during the mission so that would be another killing allies crime.
10:33 I mean technically it wasn't execution because he survived
I love how half of this video is just modern warfare 2019
"kidnapping civilians"
yeah but it's for "Negotiations"
i do like how everything is sped up it makes me giggle a little but the video is awesome non the less so much detail :D
I learnt more from this video than I did a whole decade in school