XiroDan: "I summon Pot of greed in attack mode and draw three cards. Then I summon pot of greed again in attack mode and draw 3 more cards" opponent: "that's not how that works....." XiroDan: "yes it do yugi"
Man...it's crazy going back to this vid in 2021/about to be 2022 and seeing how nadir and coder have changed, I mean their voices and like mic quality and personalities are lkke...worlds apart now
Oh gosh! You are doing more videos! Great! Now it would be hella cool if you could cover stuff like archetype deck combos, deck building tips, Yu-Gi-Oh card usage discussion is something I've never seen anyone do. Hope to see more stuff from you, keep it up
1:10 I That guy was 100% trolling cause that shit was so incorrect it hurt 1. It's unicorn not unicore 2. Unicorn only lets the player controlling it draw cards 3. It's not during the end phase but during the draw phase you draw the extra cards 4. THERE'S NO UNICORN ON BOARD
Dude I'm discovering your channel now. Good to see your Judge calls. I think some people (me included) my have some problems with chains, effect resolution, declaring effects or forgetting effects, I think in the beginning I lost a lot of games for incorrect calling of my own. Edit1: I'm a Noid player so people call judges all the time on me, (tribute for cost is my slogan).
Hey distant i know this is super off topic but is the gem-knight ftk/otk deck still viable with brilliant being banned, I'm just getting back into the game and when i quit i was playing gem knights so i have quite a bit of the deck already in paper.
4:29 Fiendess resolves with effect because as long as final battle successfully resolves, activated effects of Subterror cards can't be negated. Even if called by activates last in the chain.
@@IRoIN100 if you go to where I tagged the timestamp, Coder/Kevin agrees with what I stated. Even if called banishes and attempts to negate the Fiendess, as long as final battle's protection effect is not negated it will resolve. This is the same reason why if you use final battle 4th effect, your Subterror monster effects resolve through skill drain. Or the unofficial/lamen term will be they "push through" skill drain.
@@IRoIN100 The called banished Fiendss and do nothing The Fiendss effect will be negated by Called if it would resolves Since that Final battle already resolves, when the Fiendss resolves and would be negated by Called, it is NOT negated What the key is that the Called do nothing regardless wherever chain it is as long as Final Battle resolves first before Fiendss resolves except it negates the activation before it resolves completely ot maybe makes the Fiendss does nothing effect It is kinda confusing at first but yeah
@@IRoIN100 Another example to understand it would be this. Lets say guru search effect activate -> opponent chain ash -> chain final battle 4th effect -> opponent chain skill drain. In this situation, Skill drain resolve negating all monster on the field -> final battle resolve preventing all activated effects of subterror cards from being negated -> Ash resolve trying to negate Guru's search effect. Now, 2 cards are trying to negate guru's effect (Skill drain and Ash), but final battle prevent it from being negated so guru will still resolve
Final battle says that the activated effs of Subterrors can not be negated, so cl5: called by banishes fiendess, cl4 battle resolves, cl3 called by loses target, cl2 fiendess can't be negated bc of battle so fiendess resolves, negating cl1.
I'm glad everything worked out for you in the end but I'm still over here salty because my first Lord of terror archfiend ghost the graveyard even if I put a foolish axe on it
ive been watching coder for months and he has had a beard the whole time after seeing him with a beard and babyface i can confirm that babyface coder is inferior to beard coder
Lantern is super quiet but when he speaks up he’s funny as hell
It’s been 2 years but do you know if he has his own channel
Ok, now I DEMAND for Farfa to begin every DB duel with the following sentences...
*Hi, issue? The pile will decide your fate.*
😂😂
Case closed. Objections rejected. Negation activated.
Jeff
XiroDan: "I summon Pot of greed in attack mode and draw three cards. Then I summon pot of greed again in attack mode and draw 3 more cards"
opponent: "that's not how that works....."
XiroDan: "yes it do yugi"
8:45
Farfa: Yo! I got banned from DB and here's how it went down!
so basically, i did nothing wrong man i did nothing wrong,. but pend is best deck lets goo
Coder and Farfa are the funniest duo. And if you put Lantern in the mix it's just perfect
Man...it's crazy going back to this vid in 2021/about to be 2022 and seeing how nadir and coder have changed, I mean their voices and like mic quality and personalities are lkke...worlds apart now
5:10 the daily judge call of a Subterror player.
Oh gosh! You are doing more videos! Great! Now it would be hella cool if you could cover stuff like archetype deck combos, deck building tips, Yu-Gi-Oh card usage discussion is something I've never seen anyone do. Hope to see more stuff from you, keep it up
This video was straight up 11/10 amazing video.
lantern is such a legend
55% Judge needs help from the 98% Judge to not shark/cheat in the future games.
1:10 I That guy was 100% trolling cause that shit was so incorrect it hurt
1. It's unicorn not unicore
2. Unicorn only lets the player controlling it draw cards
3. It's not during the end phase but during the draw phase you draw the extra cards
4. THERE'S NO UNICORN ON BOARD
I know right! Lol 🤣 this momment really made my day
Still get frozen for trolling
0:03 HE SAID THE FUNNI THING!!
It’s so funny watching this when we are not on the receiving end
Just don't chet 4Head
hi, issue?
Dude I'm discovering your channel now. Good to see your Judge calls. I think some people (me included) my have some problems with chains, effect resolution, declaring effects or forgetting effects, I think in the beginning I lost a lot of games for incorrect calling of my own.
Edit1: I'm a Noid player so people call judges all the time on me, (tribute for cost is my slogan).
marcelo b bertoni Tribute for cost and ss them from grave is not an effect
@@TheCodegram yup...
*judge!*
Yo it’s my thumbnail! :)
you did a fucking amazing job on the thumbnail, i absolutely love it
CODER'S THUMBNAIL NOW coderM
Very nice
Can't believe farfa was banned!! I was laughing so hard 😂 great video tho 😂😂
can you imagine calling a judge and seeing farfa as well XD
Is there a video of the full stream of this?
liked and subbed, great content
More of these plz
Hey distant i know this is super off topic but is the gem-knight ftk/otk deck still viable with brilliant being banned, I'm just getting back into the game and when i quit i was playing gem knights so i have quite a bit of the deck already in paper.
I taught farfa how to "no!"
4:29 Fiendess resolves with effect because as long as final battle successfully resolves, activated effects of Subterror cards can't be negated. Even if called by activates last in the chain.
Really? Can chains remember backwards? Meaning „oh its not negated cuz later when final battle resolves it would cover it“ I cant believe that....
@@IRoIN100 if you go to where I tagged the timestamp, Coder/Kevin agrees with what I stated. Even if called banishes and attempts to negate the Fiendess, as long as final battle's protection effect is not negated it will resolve. This is the same reason why if you use final battle 4th effect, your Subterror monster effects resolve through skill drain. Or the unofficial/lamen term will be they "push through" skill drain.
@@IRoIN100 The called banished Fiendss and do nothing
The Fiendss effect will be negated by Called if it would resolves
Since that Final battle already resolves, when the Fiendss resolves and would be negated by Called, it is NOT negated
What the key is that the Called do nothing regardless wherever chain it is as long as Final Battle resolves first before Fiendss resolves except it negates the activation before it resolves completely ot maybe makes the Fiendss does nothing effect
It is kinda confusing at first but yeah
@@IRoIN100 Another example to understand it would be this. Lets say guru search effect activate -> opponent chain ash -> chain final battle 4th effect -> opponent chain skill drain. In this situation, Skill drain resolve negating all monster on the field -> final battle resolve preventing all activated effects of subterror cards from being negated -> Ash resolve trying to negate Guru's search effect. Now, 2 cards are trying to negate guru's effect (Skill drain and Ash), but final battle prevent it from being negated so guru will still resolve
@@alfian4653 This was the one, thx for taking some time out of your day and explaining it!
Solid Piles
Can we please get a sequel to this?
I'm your 1k sub!
wait hold up someone explain that final battle ruling to me in written form please
Final battle says that the activated effs of Subterrors can not be negated, so cl5: called by banishes fiendess, cl4 battle resolves, cl3 called by loses target, cl2 fiendess can't be negated bc of battle so fiendess resolves, negating cl1.
@@ourladydiscorderisesoteric8582 what a whack chain
I'm glad everything worked out for you in the end but I'm still over here salty because my first Lord of terror archfiend ghost the graveyard even if I put a foolish axe on it
How do I get Lanterns Rulings Document?
why did he get permabaned im like wtf
Why did Farfa get banned, did I miss something?
Wait a minute... I didn't know distant is a judge KEKW
Did Farfa ever get his account back?
How do i apply to become a judge ? I know alot of rulings and i wsnt to know how to become one because i think i can do it
we need more of this.
PogChamp
Read the fucking manual !
The guys that don't even read the rulebook is golden! XD
now he's judging people..
*CODER WHAT HAVE YOU DONE*
On Summon Judgement
jadge pls cancel the match i cannot see my opponents graveyard jadge pls or i host pokimane instead
Very funny video xdddd
Gem Knight FTK post brilliant fusion ban deck profile pls daddy coder
No
ive been watching coder for months and he has had a beard the whole time
after seeing him with a beard and babyface i can confirm that babyface coder is inferior to beard coder
you need to explain it better
tbh
No :)
no :)