Porsche Taycan Turbo GT Breaks Barriers with Record Setting 1.9 Second Zero to 60 Time

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 112

  • @DPCcars
    @DPCcars  2 дні тому +7

    👉 Note: First to Accelerate to 60 MPH in under Two Seconds Tested by Car And Driver.
    Car and Driver Lucid Sapphire did 0 to 60 mph: 2.1 sec

  • @SongySan
    @SongySan 2 дні тому +21

    Amazing what you can accomplish by adding a turbo to an EV. Beats the crap out of those naturally aspirated EVs. Maybe they can add another electric motor to act as a torque gap filler to mask the turbo lag...

    • @antarikshsaikia5498
      @antarikshsaikia5498 2 дні тому +3

      please tell me you're being sarcastic :')

    • @schrimpf
      @schrimpf 2 дні тому +1

      😂😂😂

    • @jp6975
      @jp6975 2 дні тому +1

      Wait until they bolt a supercharger onto one. Zero lag and instant torque!! And the next step will be a version of fuel injection called... electric injection!

  • @Lars-xl6lv
    @Lars-xl6lv 2 дні тому +11

    Porsche....best car manufacturer by far.

    • @schrimpf
      @schrimpf 2 дні тому

      …may be for some of the legacy cars. But not for the 2.5 tons EV monsters…

    • @RPYMCMB
      @RPYMCMB 2 дні тому

      @@schrimpfYou will see. Give it a little time. Overall performance though, there is no competition.

  • @einautofan6685
    @einautofan6685 2 дні тому +6

    No engine!
    No sound!
    No emotion!
    No desire...

  • @JMNTN
    @JMNTN День тому +1

    here i am having my first car that goes 0-100kph in under 10 seconds (9.7 seconds) thinking it is quick

  • @PistonAvatarGuy
    @PistonAvatarGuy 2 дні тому +12

    Turbo? That has to be one of the dumbest things that anyone ever could have labeled an EV.

    • @TChan-z8j
      @TChan-z8j 2 дні тому +2

      You forgot BMW calls their 4 door car a grand coupe. When you have no shame, you have no limit I guess

    • @Jason-se1ke
      @Jason-se1ke 2 дні тому

      I legit forgot the Taycan was fully EV and clicked on this thinking it was a hybrid lol (and I know a lot more about cars than most people). From a marketing standpoint, I think it makes sense to call it a turbo. Most people have no idea what that means, they just think it means FAST. I've known people who get so excited when they see the word turbo attached to a vehicle's name, like they genuinely think their 2.0L turbocharged Mini Cooper is going to win them the Le Mans some day lol.

    • @D0MIIN8T0R
      @D0MIIN8T0R 2 дні тому +1

      "Turbo" is a symbolic heritage name at Porsche, used for their highest performance flagship models. Just like Volkswagen, using "GTI" (grand tourer injection) for their high performance Golfs, which is clearly not a "grand tourer" car also all Golf engines are using fuel injection..

    • @PistonAvatarGuy
      @PistonAvatarGuy 2 дні тому +1

      @@D0MIIN8T0R No, 'turbo' meant that the car had a turbocharger, but electric cars don't have turbochargers. They could have called the more powerful version of the car any number of different names, that they chose "Turbo" is just ridiculous.

    • @D0MIIN8T0R
      @D0MIIN8T0R 2 дні тому +1

      @@PistonAvatarGuy "meant" exactly, just like I said with the GTI, now it has a different meaning. is it that hard to understand??

  • @egidiomeola
    @egidiomeola 2 дні тому +1

    Noise isn't everything

  • @princeking1562
    @princeking1562 2 дні тому +9

    What kind of bullshit was that opening! Rimac nevera already does 1.8

    • @sidthiru1509
      @sidthiru1509 2 дні тому +2

      Yeah it's got 2 doors and 890 HP more and is 2 million euros my guy

    • @chrisvogel4981
      @chrisvogel4981 2 дні тому +2

      Its not a production car

    • @Heartfromsomewhere
      @Heartfromsomewhere 2 дні тому

      @@sidthiru1509try lucid air sapphire, 1.85 sec
      1.77 with rollout

    • @sidthiru1509
      @sidthiru1509 2 дні тому

      @@Heartfromsomewhere yes indeed and the Sapphire is my favourite sedan rn. But the Porsche definitely quicker on track

    • @sidthiru1509
      @sidthiru1509 2 дні тому

      @chrisvogel4981 it is

  • @allenz4772
    @allenz4772 2 дні тому +2

    Just listen to that turbo spool 🤤

    • @Ashkanman
      @Ashkanman 2 дні тому

      It's called a turbo but there's no actual turbo lol

  • @mikep.5517
    @mikep.5517 2 дні тому +24

    Still don't want one.

  • @cella6495
    @cella6495 2 дні тому +2

    You think that 0-60 is fast?
    Just watch this car's depreciation over a year.

    • @schrimpf
      @schrimpf 2 дні тому

      The depreciation of this car is „turbo fast“…..😮

  • @horyzengaming3935
    @horyzengaming3935 2 дні тому +4

    Its electric so does not mean anything in the world of cars. Real cars have engines and can race all day long, these cannot. They are limited pieces of old electronic motor tech. Nothing new here, just a gimmick.

  • @vindevhunta4905
    @vindevhunta4905 2 дні тому +16

    This over any Tesla
    Not a ev fan any how

    • @sidthiru1509
      @sidthiru1509 2 дні тому +2

      This costs 2.5 times the price of a track pack plaid.

    • @schrimpf
      @schrimpf 2 дні тому +1

      It is much heavier than a Tesla. Sporty…?

  • @SanandanDA
    @SanandanDA 2 дні тому +2

    Now give us that performance under $30k, that’ll be impressive

  • @jeffreyengen3134
    @jeffreyengen3134 2 дні тому +3

    The Lucid Sapphire beat in all the head to head competitions.

  • @shanggorilla
    @shanggorilla 2 дні тому +2

    At what point will idiots stop measuring 0 - 60 time?
    Unless you drag race it’s meaningless for last 30 years once it was sub 5 sec

    • @chrisvogel4981
      @chrisvogel4981 2 дні тому +1

      its funny how as soon as antiquated combustion powered vehicles got dropped by the EV hard...suddenly 0-60 isnt important anymore lol 😂

  • @michaelsavo-mg2pc
    @michaelsavo-mg2pc 2 дні тому +6

    Love porsche but never want an electric sports car no fun have a turbo s super fast and love the down shifts and the handling electric feels dead that's just my opinion

    • @chrisvogel4981
      @chrisvogel4981 2 дні тому

      Good to see Porsche not getting dropped in EV tech. The 911 is still pretty antiquated....its only a matter of time

  • @michaelsummerell8618
    @michaelsummerell8618 2 дні тому +2

    Rimac Nevera 0-60 = 1.74 seconds

    • @RPYMCMB
      @RPYMCMB 2 дні тому

      Give Porsche a little time. They will soon past that too. There is no equal to Porsche. Just challengers.

  • @davebarkley8773
    @davebarkley8773 2 дні тому +1

    Why is 0-60 such a big deal anyway or near 200 MPH top speed?

    • @Jason-se1ke
      @Jason-se1ke 2 дні тому

      I'm sure there's probably some antiquated reasons for its actual origins. But I think a big part of why it's still such a big deal is because in the states, 60 MPH is a nice round number that's fairly close to the speed limit on the highway. It's a number that anyone who's been in a car can wrap their head around. To me, it basically showcases "this is how long it takes to get my car from a complete standstill to a speed where I'm flowing with traffic." You don't wanna merging on the freeway in a car that takes 15 seconds to get up to speed.

  • @m_frenk
    @m_frenk 23 години тому

    The point is that: what is the utility to reach 60 mph in under 2 seconds.... Maybe 2 or 3 times before battery starts to downgrade, but have less top speed, less cornering, big weight, no sound (and so, no soul)?.... Before Bev cars, in Europe no-one considered 1/4 mile et time something important to evaluate a supercar; now it seems the most important performance requirement. Remember that when ICE engine reaches the right torque speed grow up same as Bev ( see koenigsegg Vs rinac). Only propaganda to show superiority of bev car, enhancing the only aspect where the can beat a ice car.

  • @schrimpf
    @schrimpf 2 дні тому +1

    Nobody buys this car. As a used car impossible to find a buyer.

    • @RPYMCMB
      @RPYMCMB 2 дні тому +1

      This is not the kind of car people buy used because of the EV aspect. EVs are too costly to repair to them buy them used.

  • @AbyNeon
    @AbyNeon 2 дні тому

    it can do that only for 1 year. then its gonna die in 4.

  • @aaronvector4750
    @aaronvector4750 2 дні тому

    Wrong. Tesla Model S Plaid already did 1.9s and Lucid Air Sappphire did 1.8s. Rimac Nevera also did 1.8s.

  • @SuperSnallygaster
    @SuperSnallygaster 2 дні тому

    It's cool and all, but I'll pass.

  • @fudganuld
    @fudganuld 2 дні тому +1

    err RIMAC anyone !!!

  • @mike_oe
    @mike_oe 2 дні тому

    Never understood why an electric car should be badged "Turbo".... 😳

    • @jacquesroux7362
      @jacquesroux7362 2 дні тому +1

      For the same reason vacuums have Turbo in the name

  • @jonathasfigaro4992
    @jonathasfigaro4992 21 годину тому

    Porsche still dont get it NO ONE cares about sport eletric cars who buy a Posche dont want a Dildo.

  • @RobertCekus
    @RobertCekus 2 дні тому +1

    Not neccessary and not affordable for the normal worker. So it´s worthless on normal Roads or Highways.

  • @MrNOAH504
    @MrNOAH504 2 дні тому

    Lucid Air Sapphire has done 1.7 🤷🏾 This is still a nice car though.

  • @FrankGallagherr
    @FrankGallagherr 2 дні тому +2

    Overpriced

  • @pasitc2123
    @pasitc2123 2 дні тому

    Slow car.

  • @DeePunter
    @DeePunter 2 дні тому +2

    Oh wow its as fast as plaid now to 60

    • @yusufcanaktas6929
      @yusufcanaktas6929 2 дні тому

      but slower to 200mph

    • @cryptoskillz
      @cryptoskillz 2 дні тому

      @@yusufcanaktas6929 also $100k more expensive

    • @thomasferrarojr.9772
      @thomasferrarojr.9772 2 дні тому +1

      Hahahaha. Go drive both. Plaid is not even in the same galaxy.

    • @sidthiru1509
      @sidthiru1509 2 дні тому

      ​@@cryptoskillz more than that

    • @RPYMCMB
      @RPYMCMB 2 дні тому

      @@cryptoskillzAlso drives way better than Tesla can even imagine even with reverse engineering.

  • @Chris-o7w6w
    @Chris-o7w6w 2 дні тому +2

    Lucid Sapphire 0-60 1.89 seconds with top speed of 205 mph. 0-100 3.84

  • @egidiomeola
    @egidiomeola 2 дні тому

    Tesla has better value

    • @RPYMCMB
      @RPYMCMB 2 дні тому +1

      How? Remember Porsche has the absolute best driving dynamics. Tesla can't even dream of comparing.

  • @SomKing123
    @SomKing123 2 дні тому +1

    Maybe fastest massive produced, Rimac Nevera and McMurthy Speirling are much faster

  • @Oyama014
    @Oyama014 2 дні тому

    so this is with a rollout, not a true 0-60.

  • @cryptoskillz
    @cryptoskillz 2 дні тому +2

    Model S Plaid has been doing this for a few years

    • @DonLee1980
      @DonLee1980 2 дні тому +3

      Plaid has never done 1.9s. only in American math they did, where they remove the first .2s, which means 2.1s

  • @FrankGallagherr
    @FrankGallagherr 2 дні тому +6

    Tesla Plaid is better

    • @SomKing123
      @SomKing123 2 дні тому +13

      No, it's not

    • @bobby3914
      @bobby3914 2 дні тому

      Tesla = ugly

    • @lt6532
      @lt6532 2 дні тому +4

      Lol, no. The Porsche drives better and what do you use a car for?

    • @vivektandon9928
      @vivektandon9928 2 дні тому +2

      Really? How?

    • @vindevhunta4905
      @vindevhunta4905 2 дні тому +4

      Old plaid out stying
      It’s been around for well over a decade..junk