How Russia sidesteps the EU oil embargo with aging tankers | DW Business

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 жов 2024
  • The European Union has long relied on sea deliveries to receive the bulk of its Russian oil imports.
    Beginnning Monday, those shipments fall under embargo and will stop by early January, following a grace period. Many Russian oil tankers are now heading toward Asia.
    But can Asia make up the difference? In October, Russia exported almost 8 million barrels of crude oil and oil products, such as diesel, per day. Two and a half million of that went to the European Union, the bulk of it transported by sea. That's down from before the war.
    Crude exports have recently surged to other countries, especially India and China. In October alone, Russia transported the equivalent of 1.1 million barrels of crude to India every day. In January, it was just a mere 100,000 barrels. Crude exports to China have also increased.
    Many experts believe that as the embargo approaches, Russia is gearing up to ship more and more crude directly to Asia.
    Subscribe: www.youtube.co...
    For more news go to: www.dw.com/en/
    Follow DW on social media:
    ►Facebook: / deutschewellenews
    ►Twitter: / dwnews
    ►Instagram: / dwnews
    ►Twitch: / dwnews_hangout
    Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: / dwdeutsch
    #Russia #EU #OilEmbargo

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,4 тис.

  • @juanmoetaco6582
    @juanmoetaco6582 Рік тому +323

    Calling a tanker a "rust bucket" is a great way for a tanker to lose "self-esteam".

    • @Vladishit_Putler
      @Vladishit_Putler Рік тому +38

      we are tankful for your observation

    • @ksganaphathysubramanian8051
      @ksganaphathysubramanian8051 Рік тому +22

      Where is the self esteem of EU,UK and US. Literally linking the boots of middle east

    • @countessclaudia2376
      @countessclaudia2376 Рік тому +6

      It's also an industry term for a really old knackered ship.

    • @CS79N
      @CS79N Рік тому +10

      They're just a load of old ship. Hardly anything to boat about.

    • @Diggnuts
      @Diggnuts Рік тому +7

      @@CS79N I sea what you did there..

  • @ameyas7726
    @ameyas7726 Рік тому +22

    So basically everybody is buying Russian oil...China, India, Turkey, Middle East, Africa, South America....and EU is sulking because they are stuck with expensive oil/LNG from USA, Saudi Arabia, Qatar..

  • @sibaraku2023
    @sibaraku2023 Рік тому +10

    If the Europeans had never stopped trading with America when America invaded Iraq and Afghanistan then why would India and China stop buying oils from Russia because Russia invaded Ukraine? Another example of the double standard.

  • @mohnishdicholkar7085
    @mohnishdicholkar7085 Рік тому +26

    "A day without hypocrisy is a day of wasted "- Western countries

    • @arthas640
      @arthas640 Рік тому +1

      What's hypocritical about this story? A day of wasted what? Which western countries?

    • @sofiadias8127
      @sofiadias8127 Рік тому +1

      Someone salty. The problem is people thought west will just role over and the Russians keep getting slaped

    • @sabin97
      @sabin97 Рік тому

      to be fair usakistan and its white supremacist lackeys are not the west.
      the west is far more than just them.
      and we're not joining them in their ridiculous embargos.

    • @andanandan6061
      @andanandan6061 Рік тому

      ​@@arthas640 All of you. Thank God Saudi make use of you all. Bought cheaper oil from Russia and sold it at higher price to your hypocrite countries. Now you can taste your own medicine

    • @joshuastanton6731
      @joshuastanton6731 6 місяців тому

      Russia sucks grow up.

  • @anthonyferris8912
    @anthonyferris8912 Рік тому +215

    Uninsured rust buckets transporting oil around the world………..What could possibly go wrong?🤣

    • @jptrainor
      @jptrainor Рік тому +15

      Hmm... The EU could set a price that's too low to transport economically on the insured ships, thus turning the entire fleet into poorly maintained rust buckets.

    • @xcitemex6353
      @xcitemex6353 Рік тому +7

      Like a brand new Gas pipeline ?

    • @NTraveller
      @NTraveller Рік тому +34

      A single country monopolised the banking system, re-insurance industry and right to military interventions. What can possibly go wrong?

    • @Featherface01
      @Featherface01 Рік тому +11

      ​@@NTraveller If you can't play nice get out of the sandpit.

    • @NTraveller
      @NTraveller Рік тому +8

      @@Featherface01 there are no monopolies in the sandpits. Which proves that that sandpits are safer than international policy and economy

  • @DeptalJexus
    @DeptalJexus Рік тому +19

    Price cap means nothing if the supplier refuse to sell you goods.

  • @greathvyne5359
    @greathvyne5359 Рік тому +12

    Good for Asia

    • @peabase
      @peabase Рік тому

      Asia already buys Siberian crude at a discounted rate. This simply brings Europe on par with Asia. Asian economies lose their temporary competitive advantage, which is hard to construe as a good thing.

  • @JayToons
    @JayToons Рік тому +33

    They have to sidestep it. Otherwise, how will we keep buying Russian oil refined by Saudis at premium prices?

    • @s.m.1354
      @s.m.1354 Рік тому +1

      I used to inspect ships: most Russian commanded ships, were unpainted for long periods, painting is extremely important again corrosion.
      Some ships were almost lost, some ships were lost, many lives were lost due to “mismanagement and inadequate maintenance.”

    • @s.m.1354
      @s.m.1354 Рік тому +2

      Besides Russian oil is not premium, it contains raised amounts of sulphur compared to other standards.
      Due to this expensive sour water installations have to be installed, so the rest of the refinery doesn’t rust away.

    • @leesun1104
      @leesun1104 Рік тому

      a lot of people cant see that far ahead...lol😅🤣😂

  • @Asmuk
    @Asmuk Рік тому +14

    Dws anchors have the gift of stopping qualified guests from answering their questions properly.

  • @xinceras-6542
    @xinceras-6542 Рік тому +21

    I hope everyone noticed that they showed the change in Indian and Chinese oil imports from the star of the year, but they deliberately avoided showing EU imports from the star of the year.

    • @JohnDoe-vy5hh
      @JohnDoe-vy5hh Рік тому +1

      And your point is?

    • @archismaanrudra876
      @archismaanrudra876 Рік тому +10

      @@JohnDoe-vy5hh that Europe still bought 2.5 million barrels of oil/ day ! Europe: 2.5 mil/day
      INDIA and CHINA.: 1.1+1.9 mil/day .

    • @shelbynamels973
      @shelbynamels973 Рік тому +1

      @@archismaanrudra876 1.1 + 1.9 + 2.5 = still less than the 10 million+ shipped prior.

    • @parthajitjana2222
      @parthajitjana2222 Рік тому +6

      @@shelbynamels973 europe still buys more oil than the next 10 countries combined

    • @asakurayoh3909
      @asakurayoh3909 Рік тому +2

      @@JohnDoe-vy5hh point is you have no fkn point in asking the point.

  • @grahamcook9289
    @grahamcook9289 Рік тому +8

    Not demolished Andrew, but scrapped! Buildings and structures are demolished, but machines and vehicles such as cars, planes and ships are scrapped. Literally taken to a scrapyard for disposal and recycling.

  • @ionnanskilliorus6877
    @ionnanskilliorus6877 Рік тому +100

    Of course they will but there's the little problem of the price cap. Tell me what Asian country is going to demand to pay more for the cheap Russian oil? Hopefully they pump like mad because more oil means lower prices for everyone 😁

    • @jamesmiller2735
      @jamesmiller2735 Рік тому

      Have you forgotten that there is an organisation called OPEC & plus what say them about your price cap, it seems as though the act now and think later western elites haven't factored this in, why would OPEC members limit their profit just to satisfy you let's just take some popcorn 🍿 and see how it plays out.

    • @mateuszpapla2163
      @mateuszpapla2163 Рік тому +26

      Yeah, European countries were paying good money for Russian oil. Other countries won't

    • @coin9007
      @coin9007 Рік тому +31

      @@mateuszpapla2163 some thing cheap Russian oil helped Europe, Europe can't get as cheap oil as Russian

    • @marioformosa4259
      @marioformosa4259 Рік тому +2

      Needs know no price cap

    • @Omega0850
      @Omega0850 Рік тому +25

      @@coin9007 True, but thats over now. Europe is switching gears, and won´t come back to Russia. In the long run, this will destroy Russias economy (and military power) entirely.

  • @aminor7476
    @aminor7476 Рік тому +44

    Why would an oil buying country not want to buy Russian or any country’s oil if they can get oil at a discount?

    • @arfajob4246
      @arfajob4246 Рік тому +16

      You mean cheap. Morals, ethics and the idea that others may suffer goes right out the window.
      Business is business, right?

    • @aminor7476
      @aminor7476 Рік тому +3

      @@arfajob4246 My point is if Russian oil is completely cut off, the price of oil will go up for all of us. However if the Russians are forced to sell oil at a discount, the get revenue but a much reduced price and profit. While at the same time keeping oil prices down for everyone. The “dark horse” is OPEC! What will they do about the production of oil? Will they lower production to keep the price if oil artificially high?

    • @michaelcross4112
      @michaelcross4112 Рік тому +1

      @@arfajob4246 those are memes
      They are retcon excuses/justification for after the fact.

    • @aminor7476
      @aminor7476 Рік тому +2

      @@michaelcross4112 not memes or excuses just an observation and hypothesis based on information and facts.

    • @michaelcross4112
      @michaelcross4112 Рік тому +7

      @@aminor7476 then I did not make myself clear so to rephrase what I said:
      *Morals and ethics only count when it suits us*
      That goes for both sides.
      For example both the west and Russia pretend to care about democracy or whatever except when they don't.
      They are both selective about when they care.

  • @THypher1
    @THypher1 Рік тому +75

    An aging oil tanker I worked on earlier this year is now under Russian ownership, so I had a feeling this was going on when I found out the nationality of the new owners via ship brokers. My ship has become a modern-day blockade runner of sorts which is surreal to think about. These ships are using every normal trick in the book not to be directly linked to Russian owners, such as being registered in flags of convenience (common for most ships around the world anyway) and being owned and chartered through a series of companies (as is common for many cargo ships) as well as (in the case of my ship) being given a name that has nothing to do with being Russian. The crew onboard will likely still be Filipino given they are the largest group of seafarers by nationality. The officers may still be Russian as they were when I was onboard. The nationality of the crew and officers having little bearing on things other than the labour that's most cost effective for the owners and charterers. Getting insurance for both the ship and her cargo won't be anymore of an issue than normal either in my opinion given the way things are arranged.

    • @mcoylahyi6414
      @mcoylahyi6414 Рік тому +1

      🍻

    • @davidoldboy5425
      @davidoldboy5425 Рік тому +9

      Correct, it is very very easy to disguise everything about a vessel in the modern world. As for insurance most are unaware that for the hull you need no insurance at all, you can part insure i.e. 2/5 or fully insure up to you. Oil liability insurance is compulsory, but if you only trade between Russia and a partner willing to turn a blind eye it is possible to skip this. The Russians now in effect insure their own vessels 'in house' and their shadow fleet is highly likely to be insured just the same, with the same insurer. It will be interesting to see what insurance P&I (predominantly Western) provide to these vessels, and if it continues, and whether they comply with long range and AIS tracking, I suspect not. Enforcement of International Regulations are only really enforceable for vessels engaged in free trade, two rogue nations by agreement can effectively do as they wish. I would guess that a country that ignores the rules on invading another country by the United Nations would not lose sleep over breaking IMO regs.

    • @Crashed131963
      @Crashed131963 Рік тому +6

      People have to remember Russia is a country with less than half the population of the US with a GDP just above Spain.
      As we have seen with their military Russia has to do a lot of shortcuts in maintenance and many other things to keep up with the west.

    • @mcoylahyi6414
      @mcoylahyi6414 Рік тому +9

      @@Crashed131963 joke of the day...😂 does US possess hypersonic missiles? compare US minute man to SARMAT missiles and more.. Comon Joe we not in the old age era..🤣

    • @gremlinsaregold8890
      @gremlinsaregold8890 Рік тому +1

      Nobody is stopping the insurance... Just that to qualify for any insurance the delivery price of the oil has to be under the cap.
      But nobody is banning Russia from insuring the ships. In fact ships have no choice but to be insured.
      I suppose Russia could offer its own insurance. But then that offers all sorts of nefarious characters and organisations the chance to knock Russia for six by arranging for someone to make a claim on that.

  • @buravan1512
    @buravan1512 Рік тому +32

    All of the sudden 🚢 OIL SHIPS become RUSTY when you don't need them? 😂

    • @bramposthumus9300
      @bramposthumus9300 Рік тому +2

      No but these are second hand and aging. So it is a matter for concern, obviously.

    • @charlesekpima8210
      @charlesekpima8210 Рік тому +4

      @ Bram so there were no concern when other countries was using them you love Russia so much so you are concern

    • @bramposthumus9300
      @bramposthumus9300 Рік тому

      @@charlesekpima8210 What I am concerned about is irrelevant. The rest of your gibberish is incomprehensible.

  • @chihaya2299
    @chihaya2299 Рік тому +80

    Also the sad part is relying on old tanker ships that even with the tiniest of mistake could cause centuries of damage to the ecosystems of marine life

    • @ettoreatalan8303
      @ettoreatalan8303 Рік тому +6

      China and India will love it when a Russian rust oil tanker pollutes their territorial waters and Putin grins maliciously at the information that Russia will not pay for the damage.

    • @Chris_da_fro
      @Chris_da_fro Рік тому +6

      @@ettoreatalan8303 have you seen the rivers in India and China? Them and they're neighbors have already contaminated a lot of water and rivers. Search "Holy river in India garbage" and you will see

    • @ettoreatalan8303
      @ettoreatalan8303 Рік тому +1

      @@steveellis2501 And the sources for your speculations are...?

    • @ditnooitweer
      @ditnooitweer Рік тому

      I don't think Putin cares. He bombs maternity wards so what is a few fish worth then?

    • @s.m.1354
      @s.m.1354 Рік тому +2

      I used to inspect ships: most Russian commanded ships, were unpainted for long periods, painting is extremely important again corrosion.
      Some ships were almost lost, some ships were lost, many lives were lost due to “mismanagement and inadequate maintenance.”

  • @datrevmeister
    @datrevmeister Рік тому +50

    I just hate when reporters cut short their interviewers. That just seems so damn rude, if you don’t have time to interview a person, don’t interview them, but this is so damn rude.

    • @facundolamas950
      @facundolamas950 Рік тому +6

      Its insulting to be honest, specially when they try to interrupt them

    • @thechosenone1533
      @thechosenone1533 Рік тому +3

      The interviewer needs to be told when to stop because they have a specific time slot. It may not be nice but you don't want a single person talking all day.

    • @CountScarlioni
      @CountScarlioni Рік тому +2

      News broadcasts are tightly scheduled, usually down to the second. To keep to that schedule, news anchors have no choice but to interject and cut people short. It's the way things have been done for approaching 100 years.
      If it's any consolation, those being interviewed know that can happen in advance, and that no offence is meant by it.

    • @RuLeZ1988
      @RuLeZ1988 Рік тому +2

      I dont see an issue. Iam pretty sure the people who are getting interviewed are aware enough that the time is limited and won't be mad when they get interupted.

    • @datrevmeister
      @datrevmeister Рік тому

      @@CountScarlioni right, so edit the recorded interview for pete’s sake

  • @felixkommey2505
    @felixkommey2505 Рік тому +26

    You people are funny. Everything you throw at Russia bounces back to you and you don't stop

    • @nvelsen1975
      @nvelsen1975 Рік тому +3

      Is that why you're stealing washing machines from Ukraine, Sergei, because you have sooooo many to spare at home?

    • @greengarnish1711
      @greengarnish1711 Рік тому +3

      You don't see the bigger picture and instead see this as Russia winning? Interesting

    • @neetubajpai2136
      @neetubajpai2136 Рік тому +3

      @@nvelsen1975 and obviously people in LA,NYC,Chicago sleep on streets in December nights because they have slept in cosy homes all their life and they're just bored,right?

    • @nvelsen1975
      @nvelsen1975 Рік тому

      @@neetubajpai2136
      That's the distribution of wealth the US has chosen to have and always has had. Nothing is new.
      Just like in Russia thousands die on the streets every year and in India people dying in the streets and being attacked by BJP rape-gangs is nothing new because of the war, that's how it's always been.

    • @paularnold1930
      @paularnold1930 4 місяці тому

      Boomerang effect!😊

  • @paulblichmann2791
    @paulblichmann2791 Рік тому +4

    Could be a pretty sweet gig: buy a used tanker for $100,000, gross $350,000 a day running oil bypassing sanctions, and when the thing sinks just escape on a jet ski and walk away. You'll break even in a week so anything past that is free money.

    • @WurstPeterl
      @WurstPeterl Рік тому

      Where do you get 100k used oil tankers?

  • @maxxx1mus
    @maxxx1mus Рік тому +15

    What many in EU don't understand is that, the increase of shipment costs by the mid-buyer (processor) in Asia, Middle East and Africa will be paid by the end user in Europe. 🙄🙄

    • @rka-truthalwayswins5127
      @rka-truthalwayswins5127 Рік тому +2

      WHY NOT?? Didn't Europe Fuel It's Renaissance From Knowledge Systems In India/Asia??!!
      European Energy Freedom From Russia is Enforced By Buying Oil & Gas From Asia & Free Nations!!

    • @facts9538
      @facts9538 Рік тому

      You did watch this video right? you must have noticed that Russia has to go through the West to send oil to Asia. so the West has control of what ships can go where meaning if the West don't want the oil to get to Asia there is nothing Asia or Russia can do.

    • @maxxx1mus
      @maxxx1mus Рік тому +1

      @Facts you should educate yourself on the world law before commenting. Military ships and commercial trade ships have different rule. If the west blocks commercial ships, then the 75% of the world should sanction the west as well.

  • @Anonymous-fs3mf
    @Anonymous-fs3mf Рік тому +10

    From 100,000 barrels per day to 1.1 million barrels per day to India. That's massive jump and after Ukraine war!

    • @realnapster1522
      @realnapster1522 Рік тому +5

      India needs oil to grow. Sorry. EU needs to make peace with Russia. 😅

    • @yaboyed5779
      @yaboyed5779 Рік тому

      How much is China getting?

  • @eotlati1763
    @eotlati1763 Рік тому +22

    EU leaders keep making blunders putting it people and other in poverty. Now insurance brokers in china and india are ready to insure tankers just purchased by russia to ship it crude oil to customers ready to pay it price not price determined by EU. Madness..

    • @leesun1104
      @leesun1104 Рік тому

      exactly instead of doing what's best for the people that put them in office they bow down to America hoping to get more children to abuse

    • @lastsong7159
      @lastsong7159 Рік тому

      You realize that insurance companies can also go bankrupt with too much payouts right?

    • @MetaView7
      @MetaView7 Рік тому

      @@lastsong7159 yes and they will disappear when the SHTF.

    • @MetaView7
      @MetaView7 Рік тому

      and they are building pipelines like mad. It will take another few years and they can retire all the tankers.

    • @МараБагдасарян-ы5у
      @МараБагдасарян-ы5у Рік тому

      Slava Ukraine!

  • @sigma-sigma1
    @sigma-sigma1 Рік тому +18

    Russia can get tankers from China and india.

  • @abelulloa96
    @abelulloa96 Рік тому +3

    How can Russia ship crude oil to Asia if Russia is Asia? These news anchors are a joke.

  • @KarthikSoun
    @KarthikSoun Рік тому +13

    If India didn't buy Russian oil then oil will be 150dollars. If Nato sanctions Russian oil then oil will become 150 dollars. Blaming India is just jealousy.

    • @danielorth7267
      @danielorth7267 Рік тому

      did nato sanction russia? who is blaming india?

  • @CharliMorganMusic
    @CharliMorganMusic Рік тому +2

    "An aging fleet of ships." oh, my sweet child, wait until you see our aircraft.

    • @Omega0850
      @Omega0850 Рік тому

      Don´t forget that at the beginning of the war, Russia has stolen hundreds of commercial aircraft from foreign companies inside its borders.

  • @dansmith1661
    @dansmith1661 Рік тому +7

    A better question is how is EU ignoring its own embargo and getting oil from Russia.

  • @stephenkeen6044
    @stephenkeen6044 Рік тому +3

    Then there are the offshore ship-to-ship transfers to get oil into countries that ARE imposing embargoes... This has not impacted Russia as strongly as anybody hoped.

  • @duncanstewart6381
    @duncanstewart6381 Рік тому +3

    The oil infrastructure is primarily to Europe who pay well. Through pipes through Ukraine and others through Turkey from Iran. Selling to Asia covers the cost of storage but is a 25% write off as to normal profits this year . Energy needs to be developed and sold to pay for more development...

  • @aparnabhardwaj8500
    @aparnabhardwaj8500 Рік тому +8

    Respectfully, if told don't buy 'A' then said mouth must take accountability and ensure alternate supply of 'A' at same old rates and quantities.

    • @TheSteinbitt
      @TheSteinbitt Рік тому

      You get to buy “A” at 30% discount, didn’t you watch?

    • @aparnabhardwaj8500
      @aparnabhardwaj8500 Рік тому

      @@TheSteinbitt Exactly. Then mouth should retire.

    • @rashmiranjanswain7547
      @rashmiranjanswain7547 Рік тому

      @@aparnabhardwaj8500 kya bol rehi ho in gore angrej ko

  • @dimsum947
    @dimsum947 Рік тому +13

    Lol just from the title you could tell this was going to be a fair and balanced report 🤣

    • @arthas640
      @arthas640 Рік тому

      Everything in the title is true and pretty balanced. Russia is getting around the EU embargo by selling outside the EU and those tankers are aging, they're tankers that professional shipping companies have stopped using so they're selling them dirt cheap. Same as semi trucks or taxi cabs they use their ships until they reach a certain usage level (age or distance traveled) where the costs to upkeep and repair them gets to be too much so they sell them cheap, meaning these ships are already getting to the point where major problems are likely to occur.

  • @haithum1884
    @haithum1884 Рік тому +36

    The EU has a minimal effect on Russia, and Russia knows why. Comparing the population of the EU is 450 million, aging and declining. With China and India's 3 billion and 4.7 billion Asians, which market would you invest in if your oil producer, Asia or the EU if you, had to choose one or the other?

    • @andia968
      @andia968 Рік тому +7

      China and india gdp is rising steadily too

    • @tobiwan001
      @tobiwan001 Рік тому +12

      It still damages Russia. The EU had to do that. I could not accept a genocide on its doorstept. I am surprised India doesn't care about. It just shows that colonialism is ok for most, if it doesn't happen to you. Tragic.

    • @facty_kit1742
      @facty_kit1742 Рік тому +7

      Do u think these countries would buy Rus oil at a higher price when EU gets it for cheaper?

    • @jiridrapal7512
      @jiridrapal7512 Рік тому

      @@facty_kit1742 Eu wont get it cheaper. Russia wont supply it to EU. China and India will. They will re sell us russian oil and gas AS THEY ARE ALREADY doing.

    • @haithum1884
      @haithum1884 Рік тому +2

      @@facty_kit1742 It's already cheapest in the market, which means they will sell more than they ever did, taking over stable and long-term contracts for the middle east, which may ultimately cause issues for the EU.

  • @Jai-sy2bh
    @Jai-sy2bh Рік тому +17

    India Russia always 🇷🇺🇮🇳

    • @occamraiser
      @occamraiser Рік тому

      nice. Clever and true at the same time. Now can you work Iran into that?

    • @wintersbattleofbands1144
      @wintersbattleofbands1144 Рік тому

      Both impoverished countries with little regard for life.

  • @noelmaher4633
    @noelmaher4633 Рік тому +19

    An ageing fleet of ships? Have you seen the Chinese, Bangladeshi and Indonesian fleet working the Indian and North Atlantic Oceans..Just recently retuned from East Africa, the locals are learning Chinese and Russian.. While "we" watch the UA situation, their mining Africa and the former French influence is gone. Many Hotels we use now have Russian /Chinese TV channels, where it use to be just BBC CNN and AJ+..F24..

    • @diegovasquez7610
      @diegovasquez7610 Рік тому +1

      Nobody is learning russian, since russia isn't a relevant country. Australia has a bigger nominal GDP, has more companies in the global 2000 and more investment abroad despite having over 6 time less population, if Australia is more influential than russia, imagine european countries that have bigger economies

    • @arshu916
      @arshu916 Рік тому +2

      ​@@diegovasquez7610 live in your delusional world buddy 😂

    • @diegovasquez7610
      @diegovasquez7610 Рік тому +1

      @@arshu916 so facts are delusional? It's not my fault that russia is so poor that an island with more kangaroos than people has a nominal gdp as big as russia's

    • @diegovasquez7610
      @diegovasquez7610 Рік тому

      @@slavicmelodies9614 it isn't, the metropolitan area of Los Angeles or Tokyo have a bigger GDP than russia, you can't be relevant and have a economy smaller than a city

    • @namewithheldforprivacy7107
      @namewithheldforprivacy7107 Рік тому

      @@diegovasquez7610 they are a defence and offence super power with 6000+ nukes

  • @marc7206
    @marc7206 Рік тому +15

    whats so unsafe about an old ship? its not like its going to sink for no reason just cause its old, maybe just a little less reliable but that's really it.

    • @bullpup1337
      @bullpup1337 Рік тому

      yeah, just a few of them will sink. a few more oil spills, who cares. the environment is overvalued anyways, I mean we will all die one day either way, right?

    • @edisontesla3932
      @edisontesla3932 Рік тому

      For one thing, diminished structural integrity due to metal fatigue brought about by decades of vibrations and stresses. Those ships can snap in half like a twig in rough weather when confronted with waves sa large as cathedrals.
      Another is the main engine which could be problematic. A ship running at full speed, and suddenly the main engine fails, could have a momentum that will keep it moving for 5 kilometers before it fully stops. Only the engine run in reverse can act as a brake and if the engine malfunctions, there would be no hope of stopping the ship before a collision with anything from other ships, land mass, and shallow waters. That will then result in an oil spill, fire, or explosion.

    • @hardtackbeans9790
      @hardtackbeans9790 Рік тому +1

      The reason some do sink is exactly because they are old. Only a small problem normally. The real problem is the failure to deliver on time, fire at sea, oil spills, there are many things that can go very wrong without sinking. An old ship isn't usually a bad thing. It can be a disaster if not maintained. An oil terminal wants it product on time. Scheduling, futures prices, yada, yada. One major problem & whatever port will allow the russians in, will close quick.

    • @paulblichmann2791
      @paulblichmann2791 Рік тому +1

      Newer ships have hulls MADE IN CHINA. So Id say newer ships are no more seaworthy. They are built as cheaply as possible. Container ships for example are barely seaworthy.

  • @akkafietje137
    @akkafietje137 Рік тому +1

    What a pity for DW news, they hoped, she would say very dangerous the tankers can be broken and will never arrive

  • @mlight7402
    @mlight7402 Рік тому +25

    This is terrifying news. The ports and coastlines where these rust buckets travel will be at risk of crude oil spills.

    • @SPIDERM0OSE
      @SPIDERM0OSE Рік тому

      Especially if one or nineteen of them mysteriously accidentally on purpose explode like Nord Stream did.
      👺

    • @rubeng729
      @rubeng729 Рік тому +5

      Imagine if happened in the English channel, it would be hilarious

    • @bernventer5949
      @bernventer5949 Рік тому +2

      @@rubeng729 The Russians should do it on purpose. The costs of All Coastal European countries. You want CAPPED oil, Well here it is delivered to your beaches, free of charge.

    • @gremlinsaregold8890
      @gremlinsaregold8890 Рік тому

      Yeah that's true... And do you think Russia will pay for the cleanup?
      Also it does of course invite just such an, erm, accident. Accidents can be arranged.

    • @dkbros1592
      @dkbros1592 Рік тому +1

      Blame western stupidity 🤣

  • @shivajitripathi837
    @shivajitripathi837 Рік тому +10

    Oil prices are already soaring highs if india and China stopped buying Russian oil.. There will be physical shortage of oil.... You won't be able to get a barrel even for $200.... Do you guys want that to happen?.

    • @Automedon2
      @Automedon2 Рік тому +4

      That seems to be exactly what they want.

    • @nuanced8225
      @nuanced8225 Рік тому

      Russian oil shouldn't be bought on moral and ethical grounds if not anything else.

    • @vivekmehla9879
      @vivekmehla9879 Рік тому

      You should always write I of India in capitals.

  • @muckle8
    @muckle8 Рік тому +6

    Better a rust bucket than no oil at all

  • @thegreatdane3627
    @thegreatdane3627 Рік тому +47

    i sure hope they don't intend to sail those rust buckets full of oil through Danish waters. That sounds like something we need to keep an eye on.

    • @mustafakhan6935
      @mustafakhan6935 Рік тому +15

      Shipping lanes are in international waters. Puttiin may sSunk one of them deliberately near oresung bridge.😃😃

    • @svanimation8969
      @svanimation8969 Рік тому +2

      @@mustafakhan6935 they deserve one two oil sinking incidents

    • @sapere7
      @sapere7 Рік тому

      If the danes don’t buy it there’s no reason for them to come. I guess Danemark has a very strict embargo,not like those others Europeans countries that continue to buy Russian oil through the back door and make a laughing stock of the rest of the world.

    • @svanimation8969
      @svanimation8969 Рік тому

      @@sapere7 u probably have 0 IQ !
      About sea international trade routes
      You probably from west ! Haha your education sucks lol ! Only drugs and shooting and early pregnent high school girls 💀💀💀

    • @cookiecola5852
      @cookiecola5852 Рік тому +4

      Pretty sure if there is missing isurance for potential disasters... i dunno but i wouldnt be shocked if they can be forced to stay out of even the economic zones if those who own them cannot afford a shipping disaster...
      And while iam sure nobody used to check if tankers was insured or not, iam pretty sure everyone will have their eyes on these rust buckets🤣

  • @ytzpilot
    @ytzpilot Рік тому +4

    Selling crude heavily discounted is a very bad strategy

    • @arthas640
      @arthas640 Рік тому +4

      Russia has no alternatives, the only ones willing to buy in the same quantities as Europe are China and India who know they have Russia over a barrel. India also got screwed on some military equipment deals recently and are increasingly unhappy with Russia in general and the war really made things tough on China as well, so neither of them will be interested in shouldering part of the burden just to help Russia out.

    • @reeel5543
      @reeel5543 Рік тому

      Nah we India help Russia to keep evil west and USA terrorist country out of Asia and for world peace

  • @dozerddogg7409
    @dozerddogg7409 Рік тому +2

    No more Rusty than our American Naval Fleet...

  • @louistan7560
    @louistan7560 Рік тому +12

    Sour grapes! US-EU price-cap plans fall flat. What next, Janet Yellen?

  • @NTraveller
    @NTraveller Рік тому +25

    People who blew up a gas pipeline are suddenly anxious about the safety of oil transportation

    • @lovelybitofbugle219
      @lovelybitofbugle219 Рік тому +1

      Who blow it up?

    • @NTraveller
      @NTraveller Рік тому +12

      @@lovelybitofbugle219 the ones who profit the most and who had the resources to do it

    • @CorporalCookie
      @CorporalCookie Рік тому +3

      @@NTraveller So you have no idea...

    • @NTraveller
      @NTraveller Рік тому

      @@CorporalCookie everybody knows. But nobody dares to mention you-know-who )))

    • @realnapster1522
      @realnapster1522 Рік тому +2

      CIA and US navy 😅

  • @choikof9725
    @choikof9725 Рік тому +13

    Well as long as those 'rust Bucket' go from A to B I dont see the problem. The only problem I see is western shipping and insurance companies will see less money in the drawer. 😂😂😂

  • @Imprudentman
    @Imprudentman Рік тому +4

    as soon as Western Europe introduces a fixed price for any oil, they immediately say goodbye to these oil suppliers. That is, they will create all the conditions for an oil shortage. This means that countries will experience a shortage of energy resources. Alas ...Now the Europeans are watching how Russian oil is sailing to the other side of the world and, probably, they get special pleasure from all this. 🤑

  • @trogdortpennypacker6160
    @trogdortpennypacker6160 Рік тому +5

    See a lot of people noting China, so when it comes to exports to China, a significant amount of this transported by the ESPO pipeline 1.6 mb/d and another pipeline via Kazakhstan, so it's often not by tanker.

    • @agn855
      @agn855 Рік тому

      That’s a fraction of what has been sold to the West. So they would have to decrease the amount of pumped oil (besides having to provide huge price discounts bc of non-existing storage capacities) nothing you wanna do if you have to transfer it through an arctic climate area.

    • @MetaView7
      @MetaView7 Рік тому +1

      @@agn855 more pipelines are in the works. The London insurance business will go the way of the dodo bird.

  • @narharjoshi7150
    @narharjoshi7150 Рік тому +2

    Aging or not, they are insured that's the main point and they are supplying oil)))

  • @Crashed131963
    @Crashed131963 Рік тому +11

    Russia has to sell oil to China and India at below market discount prices. Less money for the same amount.
    Then India's and China previous oil supplies before the war now are looking for new buyers.

    • @russ_6214
      @russ_6214 Рік тому +2

      But OPEC is literally using it as an excuse to cut production to bump up oil prices, plus Russian Ural exiting western markets drives up price of Brent. So yes, Russian Ural oil is selling to discount… to overpriced Brent because of the western sanctions. The only affect this has had is giving an advantage to China and India’s economy over the west, thereby making preserving US hegemony that much more difficult.

    • @himanshusingh5214
      @himanshusingh5214 Рік тому +6

      The previous sellers are not looking for new markets, they are already selling to Europe for high profits.

    • @randar1969
      @randar1969 Рік тому +1

      @@himanshusingh5214 Good for them... It's not that Europe cannot afford it.... But if it's really above $80 they could start delving it from the North Sea again takes a while to build though.

    • @ОльгаБоголепова-щ2л
      @ОльгаБоголепова-щ2л Рік тому +3

      Если Россия ненадолго уйдёт с нефтяного рынка цены на нефть взлетят выше гор Памира. Русские, скорее всего, сократят продажу нефти, что бы цены выросли, им это выгодно, а покупатель на их недорогую нефть всегда найдется. Поэтому русские так спокойны. Их даже не берут никакие санкции. Россия оказалась гораздо сильнее, чем думал Запад, он Россию не просчитал, а теперь имеет у себя энергетический кризис. В России цена за 1 киловатт электричества в 100 раз ниже, чем в Европе.

    • @hgv1947
      @hgv1947 Рік тому +1

      @@ОльгаБоголепова-щ2л bollocks

  • @vkb152
    @vkb152 Рік тому +1

    Doesn't matter what u call them... They put a nail in price cap coffin.... don't worry

  • @hellize4212
    @hellize4212 Рік тому +10

    Yeah: "we have to leave it there now"... of course, because she didn't agree 🤣

  • @xavariusquest4603
    @xavariusquest4603 Рік тому +1

    She's a great guest. Her most important point...one not discussed...is that introducing the concept of a cap doesn't matter if the cap is provisionally at or higher than the price being paid by those nations getting the "friends and family discount".

    • @adhirbose9910
      @adhirbose9910 Рік тому

      Exactly. India & China really don't care. What they do care about is getting a good deal.
      Because we have to think about almost 4 billion people ( China 1.4 billion and India 1. 3 billion) and we import more than 80 % of our oil and gas, previously most of it came from the middle East ( Saudi. Iraq. Iran. UAE) but now thanks to the west the Russians are undercutting the Arabs and it's a win win situation for countries like India & China. Japan and South Korea, the last 2 may bow down to western pressure, but the first 2 will NOT.

  • @jakee74
    @jakee74 Рік тому +6

    Someone already tried to damage a tanker with a drone a week or so ago... might want to keep that in mind

    • @peterrose5373
      @peterrose5373 Рік тому

      Maybe Ukraine can issue letters of marque to a double dozen somalis, micronesians, or myanmar rebels, Keep sinking the empty tankers until the Muscovites start sending escorts along with them. Raise the cost a bit.

    • @jakee74
      @jakee74 Рік тому

      @@peterrose5373 This is war, so I doubt they are always empty.

    • @charlesekpima8210
      @charlesekpima8210 Рік тому

      @@peterrose5373 what is 1t with the Russian hate ? Live your life and let the Russians live theirs

    • @nvelsen1975
      @nvelsen1975 Рік тому

      @@charlesekpima8210
      I would've loved if the Russians had let my two friends live. But they brutally murdered them with an AA missile and then stole their wedding rings.
      Quite frankly if you don't hate Russia at this point, something is wrong with your head.

    • @charlesekpima8210
      @charlesekpima8210 Рік тому +2

      @@nvelsen1975 so my hate or love of Russia should be base of what happened to your friend, so the people that died in irag Yemen Libya Donbass over the past years,who should they channel their hate to? Be sensible

  • @Melissa-ot1ig
    @Melissa-ot1ig Рік тому +1

    My question is how did US convince lapdog olaf sholz that blowing nord stream was good for the german people?

  • @chadfife3265
    @chadfife3265 Рік тому +4

    A reminder...this is crude oil. Gas which Russia used to sell to EU, is in vapour form and can only be transport by pipeline. Currently Russia has no pipeline to India, SEA, and only 1 small pipeline to China.

    • @nvelsen1975
      @nvelsen1975 Рік тому

      Not to mention no facilities to liquify gas and no connections between their various fields. So even if they use special sekrit putin-magic to increase the capacity of those lines by 99999% they're still stuck because that's one field, to one small section of China with no connections.
      And Beijing is pretty pissed with Putin for both the war and murdering Chinese citizens several times. This lead to the famous 'Wolf Warrior tweet', indicating Putin ignoring Beijing's call to respect their authority and respect Chinese citizens, is seen as a loss of face in Beijing.
      Pretty dangerous place for Putin to be in if you consider the domestic pressure on Xi Jinping means he could do with a foreign distraction like "Look at what these evil Russians have done to our noble citizens who were staying in Ukraine"

    • @TheMadara05
      @TheMadara05 Рік тому +2

      China have already 2 pipe lines and gas pipes

  • @vaipadalkar6719
    @vaipadalkar6719 Рік тому +2

    EU should change there name to "LAPDOG OF USA"

  • @vikramkumarp
    @vikramkumarp Рік тому +5

    Moral of the story is Energy can be sold anywhere in the world

  • @sjoervanderploeg4340
    @sjoervanderploeg4340 Рік тому +9

    Barrel is just a fluff word for news readers to sound knowledgeable while they don't even know how much is in a barrel.

    • @sjoervanderploeg4340
      @sjoervanderploeg4340 Рік тому

      And I can never take someone serious if they use OS X and leave the dock completely default, 15% of your screen estate poof gone and unusable!

    • @sjoervanderploeg4340
      @sjoervanderploeg4340 Рік тому

      It just shows me how much effort someone put in anything, not a lot I can tell you from experience ;)

    • @TestDonCqmDJorr-qKDdKENPg
      @TestDonCqmDJorr-qKDdKENPg Рік тому

      mRnJ-@s,As\0z%eJNiqn`ud4 D~

    • @davevaderlp784
      @davevaderlp784 Рік тому +2

      Its a unit of measurement…

    • @davidhayes5382
      @davidhayes5382 Рік тому

      50gallons

  • @Mike-mi7vn
    @Mike-mi7vn Рік тому +16

    What about the Russian oil being refined in Italy ?

    • @chrisjackson1215
      @chrisjackson1215 Рік тому

      It's worse than that. Russia dumps barrels of oil in international water off the coast of Greece, Greek companies pick it up and bring it back. It puts the whole thing into a legal grey zone where they aren't technically violating sanctions.

    • @lore00star
      @lore00star Рік тому +1

      old line, will not last

    • @vivekmehla9879
      @vivekmehla9879 Рік тому +4

      Russian oil coming through Hungarian pipeline to Germany isn't old right,!

    • @Nvk95729
      @Nvk95729 Рік тому +6

      @@AahFukIt Belgium buying Russian diamonds at same pace ???????

    • @Nvk95729
      @Nvk95729 Рік тому +12

      @@AahFukIt Americans and Europeans buying nuclear fuel from Russia?

  • @agn855
    @agn855 Рік тому

    Any idea how you will pump that oil on whatever rusty ship if you haven’t had the equipment to handle that new/extra capacity already in place? And building that site, while being under sanctions, in an arctic environment, in the winter. Priceless.

  • @sarcasmo57
    @sarcasmo57 Рік тому +3

    To heck with Russia.

  • @DLWELD
    @DLWELD Рік тому +1

    You're saying that the Russian oil tankers aren't shiney? Don't have new paint? Serious, serious stuff. A major problem for Russia.

  • @normthom123
    @normthom123 Рік тому +20

    All that is happening is Russia is shipping it's Oil to China, Turkey and China. They will refine it, sell it back to Europe at a massive profit. The Price Cap policy is insane.

    • @TheSteinbitt
      @TheSteinbitt Рік тому +1

      How tf are you supposed to make massive profit on 30% discount while having to freight it around the world just to refine it?

    • @МногоХочешьНаглыйГугл
      @МногоХочешьНаглыйГугл Рік тому +1

      @@TheSteinbitt Because after you refine it, it's not "russian" anymore. Ask indians. Their massive refine industry is happy to exploit stupidity of european population. (Not stupidity of european leaders, they know exactly what they are doing)

    • @CountScarlioni
      @CountScarlioni Рік тому +2

      China and India are only interested because Russia agreed to sell to them at a bargain basement rate. Refining and selling on is risky because those countries will then be targetted for secondary sanctions. So sure, they're going to take advantage of the cheap oil bonanza whilst Russia keeps the sale price on, but they aren't going to push their luck or it'd work out uneconomical.
      In the meantime Russia loses the market of an entire continent, and is locked into selling its oil to Asia far below market rates. Either way, it's a win for western interests.

    • @normthom123
      @normthom123 Рік тому

      That is what Russia has been doing already over the past few months and that is why they amassed so many billions in oil revenues

    • @TheSteinbitt
      @TheSteinbitt Рік тому

      @@normthom123 But less then they otherwise would have. Much less. Even if other countries sell this on, it’s good course it lowers oil prices and Russia won’t cap prices through opec because they really need volume at those prices.

  • @bmused55
    @bmused55 Рік тому +1

    Only a matter of time before one of these cheaply crews rust buckets either simply breaks up from the load or hits something and ends up spilling oil.

  • @j2b348
    @j2b348 Рік тому +1

    Yesterday these same tankers where just fine when they where friends with Russia now they suddenly called "Rust buckets".

  • @mohnishdicholkar7085
    @mohnishdicholkar7085 Рік тому +7

    "Europe problems are world problems, but world Problems are not Europe problems ",-
    Dr.S.Jaishankar

    • @arthas640
      @arthas640 Рік тому

      I guess that explains why Europe never caught COVID, didnt get hurt by the great recession, arent being effected by climate change, didnt face shortages or increased costs from China shutting down due to zero COVID policies, and didnt get impacted by Russia invading Ukraine.

  • @rburnett6266
    @rburnett6266 Рік тому +1

    We are not stopping the Russian tankers docking offseas with north Korean ships. The ships look Chinese, but are not ..

  • @pradeepra
    @pradeepra Рік тому +5

    These crude get refined in Asian refineries and get sold to European markets.

    • @arthas640
      @arthas640 Рік тому +1

      The only reason the EU bought russian oil and gas is because shipping via pipeline from Russia was cheaper than bringing it in by ship one way from the Gulf or the Americas, not because Russia is the worlds only source of oil. It makes zero sense to ship oil all the way from Russia to Asia (a great distance than Gulf to Europe) and then ship it aaaaallllll the way back to Europe (passing through the Suez canal a second time, which alone is almost as much as the shipping costs). The US is already producing a ton and has ships lining up to offload to Europe, they have zero reason to spend more money just for the sake of helping Russia out when there are numerous other, cheaper sources.

  • @ECECECECEC
    @ECECECECEC Рік тому +2

    Shadow fleet of rust buckets? That is their navy. 😢

  • @duncansmith7562
    @duncansmith7562 Рік тому +44

    It's Europe that will pay the extra costs. Yes, Russia will incur higher costs getting the oil to India, but India will make sure the selling price of "Indian" oil to Europe will cover Russia's higher costs AND India as the middleman. Europe will lose out, not Russia. EU leaders have no grasp of basic economics, but just love to whine about old ships on the ocean.

    • @Tej517
      @Tej517 Рік тому +2

      Western governments don't have any issues in sale of Russian oil, they just want the oil to be sold with razor thin profit margins or at loss. That's why price cap.

    • @ionnanskilliorus6877
      @ionnanskilliorus6877 Рік тому +15

      Think again. EU and G7 stops buying Russian oil. That means they have to sell more to everyone else (who actually buys it) at the lower price. Which means they have to pump a lot more to get any sort of profits. That then leaves everyone else who sells oil with a much smaller market, to get anything over the price cap. Less costumers with more producers means lower prices for everyone.

    • @Madame702
      @Madame702 Рік тому +13

      No Duncan. This the last year that Russia can threaten Europe.

    • @manemane6824
      @manemane6824 Рік тому +12

      @@ionnanskilliorus6877 so why is crude oil 23% more expensive then this time last year

    • @xcitemex6353
      @xcitemex6353 Рік тому +8

      Don't forget Turkey.
      EU will be paying a fortune for Russian oil/Gas via Erdagon

  • @MasudRana-du2tk
    @MasudRana-du2tk Рік тому +2

    Moral of the story gradually Russia making market except Europe.😂

  • @louissosa1535
    @louissosa1535 Рік тому +12

    No OPEC+ nation will agree to a price cap, period. If that's allowed, what will be next, tomatoes, potatoes, avocado.

  • @mihaicozma4054
    @mihaicozma4054 Рік тому +2

    Oil market is fluid. The Middle East will give more to Europe and Russia will give more to Asia now. The deal is made already in May inside OPEC .....Awake guys. The same output of oil will be and will be even at more high price due to transportation cost now. So at the end the end users pay more not the oil producers lost. Stay tune !

  • @mohamedahmed-uw7cb
    @mohamedahmed-uw7cb Рік тому +8

    I does not matter if it is a rust tanker or new one, what is important is the cargo they are carring. Assian countries are not realy buying that much oil due to their local needs rather they are buying to sell it to EU at double the price who refused to buy it from russia directly. Anyway before russia was the only party who was benefiting gas and oil business in EU, but now Asia is alsoprofiting this business too

    • @Obsidian-Nebula
      @Obsidian-Nebula Рік тому

      There is a way to test where it comes from

    • @TheSteinbitt
      @TheSteinbitt Рік тому +1

      Double the price? Are you slow? Brent is 80$, Russian crude is 60, why tf would anyone buy oil at 120$??

    • @Obsidian-Nebula
      @Obsidian-Nebula Рік тому +1

      @@TheSteinbitt He used "double the price" a figure of speech, chill..

  • @bambang303378
    @bambang303378 Рік тому

    Here is the kicker. No insurance companies will sell policy to these ships. Can you imagine shipping hundred million dollars worth of goods with no insurance.

  • @Scapestoat
    @Scapestoat Рік тому +5

    Maybe it is time to bar access to EU waters?
    An oil spill from these aging tankers seems inevitable.

    • @mrjerzheel
      @mrjerzheel Рік тому +1

      Tankers are still permitted to use international waters, Russia wont be using EU territorial waters

    • @Omega0850
      @Omega0850 Рік тому +1

      Agree! We should not wait for this to happen.

    • @bitterballs356
      @bitterballs356 Рік тому +5

      Those aren't your waters they are international waters

    • @svanimation8969
      @svanimation8969 Рік тому +2

      @@Omega0850 u can't according to international waters law !
      And Putin probably gonna intensionally spill some oil in your eyes ! 😆

  • @xekul
    @xekul Рік тому +2

    great, old "rust bucket" tankers - seems like a recipe for oil spills...

  • @romar1581
    @romar1581 Рік тому +3

    As I understand, there is an insurance-ban on russian vessels as part of the sanctions. Does this imply that those ships will be sailing uninsured?

    • @ОльгаБоголепова-щ2л
      @ОльгаБоголепова-щ2л Рік тому +1

      От русских можно ожидать чего угодно! Русские привыкли и даже любят рисковать, для них это норма жизни. Поскольку у Запада нет возможности влиять на Россию, т.к. она вышла почти из всех западноевропейских организаций, то принудить Россию оплачивать мероприятия по устранению аварий не получится. 🤦‍♀️

    • @jouvertalandwa5337
      @jouvertalandwa5337 Рік тому

      It has its own insurers

    • @reappermen
      @reappermen Рік тому

      As far as I read there is no ban on insuring russian tankers as long as the price per Barrel of the transported oil is below 60$

    • @luci75d76
      @luci75d76 Рік тому

      Western companies can’t insure. But this not mean other counties as china or Russia they are not allow to insure. Of corse they can insure. The Russians build up a special insurance company where many county’s use it even since 6 years ago. The Chinese have 3 big insurance company for shipping industry. So the ban on insurance is equal to zero. They an make only lost to this Insurance company in the west. The Greeks lose a lot on this game ! The British as well they lost 10% of the shipping capacity insurance already. Wait and see things will change very fast next year ! More and more shipping company will use te Chinese insurance groups ! Is just about reticence if paper work now. But things will change in future

  • @facts9538
    @facts9538 Рік тому

    No need to insult the tanker, Poor guys just a worker trying to feed his family.

  • @basiladnan1557
    @basiladnan1557 Рік тому +38

    Insurance policies of these second hand tankers will be a problem in addition to the massive pollution associated with them . I still don't understand the miscalculations of Putin , as it is obvious he wrongly assumed that Ukraine will capitulate in few days or weeks and the West is too weak and divided to make a tough stand .

    • @PuddingXXL
      @PuddingXXL Рік тому

      Yeah but now hes in too deep. Really interested in seeing how this will end but I don't see any positive future for Putin even if he wins by his own conditions now, the damage to Russia has been dealt.
      Bringing us back into the 19 hundreds was such a great plan by putler... (sarcasm off)

    • @baltazarfloresjr7137
      @baltazarfloresjr7137 Рік тому

      I will simplify it for you the Russians have been loosing power since the downfall of the Soviet Union there trying to reconquest/influence all Slavic & Central Asian countries because of Nato and other rising powers they have to move fast or they will collapse n the country will be fall

    • @alexsalemo9137
      @alexsalemo9137 Рік тому +2

      CIA troll puppet, Ukraine is surrounded since March in Estambul negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, but the US and puppets Europeans plus NATO , is the reason why this conflict still up until today

    • @cookiecola5852
      @cookiecola5852 Рік тому +4

      Whenever i thought about Russian maritime, i only think about rusty fishing boats/ships
      Ofc might be a missconception, doubt there is any diffrence with Russian sailors on a tanker
      I doubt pulling a big fleet of rusty tankers in service will be a benefit in the long run, all it will be is some enormous oil spill, and India will plead for money to clean it up or something

    • @alexsalemo9137
      @alexsalemo9137 Рік тому +1

      @@baltazarfloresjr7137you not going to live to see colapse of Russia 🇷🇺 anyway keep watching western TV Russophobic documentary’s

  • @briant5685
    @briant5685 Рік тому

    OPEC+ will not accept sucha amove infact they are even discussing about reducing the production of oil output per day,EU and US is screwed

  • @alexsalemo9137
    @alexsalemo9137 Рік тому +4

    The so called west just jealous of those countries that benefit front Russians cheaper oil and gas 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @yaboyed5779
      @yaboyed5779 Рік тому

      America boutta charge em real good😂😂😂😂😂

  • @dannybartlett4225
    @dannybartlett4225 Рік тому +2

    Russia is earning more money now than before the war 😳

  • @paulblichmann2791
    @paulblichmann2791 Рік тому +9

    Shipbuilding peaked like 100 years ago. So I wouldn't worry too much about having the newest.

    • @WinterGK
      @WinterGK Рік тому +4

      Yeah but rust is like a cancer. It needs to be removed or it just eats through

    • @michaeldy3157
      @michaeldy3157 Рік тому

      Not so. Most tankers ,and large cargo ships are not used after thirty years. They are not safe after that. So ships are built to replace them...

  • @MitzvosGolem1
    @MitzvosGolem1 Рік тому +2

    They get it done.
    Germany has how many tankers 2?

    • @Automedon2
      @Automedon2 Рік тому +5

      Well, to be fair Germany doesn't have oil or gas. They just leach off other countries for power. They have some windmills, though, I hear.

    • @alganis3339
      @alganis3339 Рік тому

      4 of the biggest oil tankers fleet are from the EU and 2 are greek by the way. (the 2nd 3th 4th and 6th biggest fleet)

    • @MitzvosGolem1
      @MitzvosGolem1 Рік тому +1

      @@alganis3339 rent them to Russia.. Germany is buying Russian gas anyway.
      And owes Greeks a lot of money from what they did during WW2 .
      שלום

  • @panthomromah1551
    @panthomromah1551 Рік тому +10

    Good news for us asian..low cost oil means good for our economy..thanks Russia.👍 ...why EU is so salty????

    • @yaboyed5779
      @yaboyed5779 Рік тому

      EU just doing EU things😂😂😂

  • @porkch0mp538
    @porkch0mp538 Рік тому

    Price cap needs to be lower then? You cut off her conclusion? Should it be 1$? 47$? Why did the G7 pick 60 then???

  • @asishreddy7729
    @asishreddy7729 Рік тому +4

    Amazing how relentlessly Europe continues to shoot itself in the foot. Europe’s loss is Asia’s gain. Hope you guys are prepared to struggle a lot the next few years.

  • @S62r
    @S62r Рік тому +2

    Missing the main question here: why do they need to buy aging tankers?

    • @farzinfrank2553
      @farzinfrank2553 Рік тому

      To by pass the embargo

    • @leesun1104
      @leesun1104 Рік тому +2

      exactly some people are so bias that it makes them say shiz that make no sense😁😆

    • @georgeiv6925
      @georgeiv6925 Рік тому

      Cheapest assets to buy and lose less if they end up confiscated. New VLCC costs around 100million dollars second hand q0 years or more around 30% of that price

  • @rubeng729
    @rubeng729 Рік тому +6

    Can russia export oil through the north-south corridor that goes through iran to india?

    • @TheMadara05
      @TheMadara05 Рік тому

      Yes they can , if you look the map where is Russia and iran , there Caspian sea and USA or nato doesn't have access there or any rights to get there

    • @oldbloke135
      @oldbloke135 Рік тому +1

      @@TheMadara05 Well they could in theory, except for the problem that there is no such corridor.

    • @rubeng729
      @rubeng729 Рік тому +2

      @@oldbloke135 yes there is, it passes through arzebaijan. Is a train corridor, it goes to a port city in iran that connects with a port city in india (mumbai I think). Is in trials phase right now

    • @arthas640
      @arthas640 Рік тому +1

      @@rubeng729 shipping things by rail costs more than by sea and cant ship in bulk as efficiently. Also cant be offloaded as efficiently as you have to fill and empty each car individually. This is part of why the US was importing small amounts of oil from Russia, it was cheaper to ship by sea clear across the Pacific rather than bringing it by rail from Texas to California.

  • @timkahn2813
    @timkahn2813 Рік тому +1

    they need to look at available storage of the buyers.

  • @davidhoffmann6771
    @davidhoffmann6771 Рік тому +3

    Great… used tankers that can cause huge oil spills

    • @ОльгаБоголепова-щ2л
      @ОльгаБоголепова-щ2л Рік тому

      И русские платить за аварии не будут, так как они вышли почти из всех западноевропейских организаций. И ещё они обижены за взрыв их трубы в Северном потоке. Авария с танкером будет проблемой той страны, около которой случится катастрофа.

  • @yourfather2732
    @yourfather2732 Рік тому +1

    Now i selected whear i given eny Russias oil by tanger too

  • @yavagalsomu
    @yavagalsomu Рік тому +4

    Europe watches with desperation as Russia comes out of all the sanctions with flying colors.

  • @greatplayerfan
    @greatplayerfan Рік тому +1

    Indonesia has no capacity to refine medium-heavy crude oil type

  • @stevencharnock9271
    @stevencharnock9271 Рік тому +8

    Shipping the oil is one thing storing it is another. The tankers can be used but unless they can unload they can't do the next trip so after the surge of cheap oil the amount of oil that can be exported. will drop. Next is demand it will take a long time for China and India to increase the demand.

    • @agn855
      @agn855 Рік тому +1

      Next are secondary sanctions.
      West:"You're buying oil from Russia? Welcome on our new "Supporter’s of a terrorist state"-sanction list."
      Oh, Price cap!
      India/China: "How many you wanna charge us while you’re only getting 60$ from the West?" Russia: "As much as possible!"
      India/China: "60.001$. Deal. You’re welcome."
      Russia: "WTF…?!"
      India/China: "Well, you can store it. Oh okay, you can’t. What about drinking it?"

    • @jontyfernandez5146
      @jontyfernandez5146 Рік тому +3

      @@agn855 have you been drinking?

    • @krishnachaitanya1220
      @krishnachaitanya1220 Рік тому +3

      @@jontyfernandez5146 certainly cheap stuff

    • @leesun1104
      @leesun1104 Рік тому +1

      wow...so I guess you work on the docks in china? and inspected all the tankers nice job to have....lol

    • @stevencharnock9271
      @stevencharnock9271 Рік тому

      @@leesun1104 No doubt every shipping movement is observed by satellite or simply by ships tracking programmes that you can see all vessels with their transponders switched on. It is not rocket science to follow ship movements.

  • @davidcritchley3509
    @davidcritchley3509 Рік тому +2

    This show also said Ukraine was storming the Kremlin. Can that be true?🤣🤣🤣

  • @johnadey9464
    @johnadey9464 Рік тому +14

    Who is going to pay the huge insurance costs that the Asian ports will demand before accepting these "rust buckets" certainly no one in the west; or anyone that wants to avoid secondary sanctions, that rules out the vast majority of insurance companies capable of carrying such a risk.

    • @ettoreatalan8303
      @ettoreatalan8303 Рік тому

      Putin's word of honor that nothing will happen. Who would distrust a lying fascist klepto dictator….🤣

    • @darthwiizius
      @darthwiizius Рік тому

      The insurance is provided by a western group made up of 2 UK companies, a Norwegian company, a US company and a Japanese company and no insurance will be provided on ships transporting Russian oil sold for 1 penny over $60 a barrel anywhere on Earth. Now you say "can't they just insure them domestically?" Sure they can, but an oil disaster can cost 100s of billions of buckeroos to clean up which is why risk is spread across the industry on a global scale, one oil spill would bankrupt most countries on Earth via the liability so in short, Russia is heading for a fall one way or another, sooner or later.

    • @oldbloke135
      @oldbloke135 Рік тому +2

      @@darthwiizius Russia can "insure" the ships. They just won't pay out in the event of a disaster. You can only become an international pariah once, and they've already done that. It's like a serial killer worrying about a parking ticket.

    • @darthwiizius
      @darthwiizius Рік тому

      @@oldbloke135
      When the first spill occurs and Russia can neither underwrite the liability or respond to mitigate it in real time they will lose most if not all the markets they ship to as those countries watch the country polluted economically collapse under the burden of having to deal with the consequences alone. This is why oil tanker insurance is organised through spreading the risk costs globally, most nations do not have the capacity financially or technically to deal with such a situation, the only nations outside some western nations (US, UK, Scandinavia, France, Netherlands off the top of my head) are China and Japan, and even then I'm not convinced that China has the maritime experience to do so effectively.

    • @prasadgaikwad7108
      @prasadgaikwad7108 Рік тому

      @@darthwiizius by the history books
      Most of oil spills have happened in
      Or near EU and US. Priority for asian
      Countries is to get cheaper oil from
      Wherever possible. Even if oil
      Soill happen Asian countries are least
      Bothered as human live value is
      Negligible compared to west.standards.
      Oil spill theory is a propoganda tool
      Spread by global marine insurance
      Companies.let these rusty bucket
      Transport oil and we will have to see
      If there's any oil spill taking place.
      Every one here is talking as if insured
      Tankers never cause oil spill..

  • @aaronbaker2186
    @aaronbaker2186 Рік тому +1

    I'm just thinking about an uninsured Russian tanker breaking up off India and spilling millions of gallons of oil.
    Costing India 80 billion Rupees in lost fishing revenues the first year, along with other costs to tourism, and the effects on health, quality of life, etc.

  • @wilsonedwards8139
    @wilsonedwards8139 Рік тому +3

    Good 2 know. Very informative. Thanks.❤