I tried to make a copy of his portrait at the beginning. I did not draw it out and got his head too big, then I got frustrated because I could not do it and gave up. I am much better as a painter today but now the canvas is damaged.
He's obviously bilingual (at least) in English and Dutch, as after he speaks names in a Dutch accent, the following couple of words are also tinged in the Dutch accent. He also lets the Dutch accent slip throughout if you concentrate. You can tell this quite often when he says 'paint, or words with 'r' constanant.
Fifty years ago, I had the pleasure of taking a self-guided tour of the Rijksmuseum that hold many of the paintings of the Dutch Masters. As an amateur artist, I was mesmerized by the careful style & craftsmanship of their paintings that delivered an intimate sense of presence and realism. The intricate paint strokes created a grand illusion. Their period in art history was captured with the high-style clothing and artifacts of their time, distinctly marking early Enlightenment with a magical blend of art and science! Those paintings also showed the Masters' patience that few modern people could endure, even with the zen-like mental transcendence that often pulls the artist into a different world. I carefully studied Rembrandt's 'The Black Watch', 'The Jewish Bride', and other oils by him and other Masters. Meanwhile, my wife was tugging me to move along as I gazed! It was an amazing experience to see up close & personal much of the greatest art ever!
There is a Museum in Sarasota Florida, The Ringling Museum. On the Gulf of Mexico. They have an assembly if different Art Deco buildings and a mansion called Cadzan. Very beautiful grounds. Their Masters Paintings are fantastic. That building takes a day to walk through. You would really enjoy it.
I know it's not the "exact" same, but as I watched this, it just reminded me of really gifted chefs -- they are also gardeners and understand their ingredients. The brilliance (imo) of using sand to create light effects. I really enjoyed this documentary, and appreciate all of the effort of everyone.
Temperature also affects oil paint viscosity. I watched a plein air painter paint a cityscape, as a snow storm started. The paint got thicker as the snow came down faster and faster, and as the temperature dropped. Near the end of the painting, the painter had to string out the paint onto the canvas, or glop it on. The painting really did look like a city in a blizzard. I dont know how he did it. I've bundled up, and tried painting during just a light fluffy snow, and could only manage maybe 45 minutes, or an hour tops.
Through the sciences we get great insight into the pigments and binders , but the actual materials he used is still a secret . This tells me one thing , he was an alchemist as well. His need to use textures to convey his dimensional effect, as well as working with light shadow and distance was unique and pioneering.
@Janitor Queen No harm done and yeah, I was sloppy with my translation skills in th'm dayz ... ;-D 'home schooled', you know . And I'm really not so easily offended after so many years drifting on You Tube. Ever since I was 5 years old, I wanted to speak and write English. Now that I'm sixty I still make those stjoopid mistakes 🤣
Hi when I was at art school there was a lot of interest in old master's painting methodology, and I distinctly remember that cold pressed linseed oil was supposed to have been left to thicken for several days , or maybe even weeks, in sunlight, to enable linoxin to form.The effect on the oil would have apparently been superior to boiling it, as that browns it too much.
I think what you're referring to is stand oil. I had a teacher who really liked it but I never got on with it. He was really into scumble-like effects but I always wanted a smooth, creamy texture.
@mister kluge I just looked up what stand oil is and the article claimed it's a group of products. Whatever, I didn't like it but the artist who did was Bruce Samuelson.
This reminds me of Werner Herzog's Kaspar Hauser, when the scholars couldn't rest until they knew what was going on in Kaspar's brain. Let it go people. Rembrandt was a genius... he was magical. Let it go and enjoy his work.
It's actually most amazing that his paintings held up. By using thicker paint to produce texture, there seems to be more area that may be affected by time. Cleaning such paintings must have been especially difficult.
This presentation and research methods, and final conclusions are astounding, and as a novice portrait painter, trying to capture some of the feelings and gestures of a few of his self-portraits, I have so much greater respect for his work, but as you said, even this opens us up to even more questions, this was so incredibly wonderful and helpful, especially when you specified that he worked with a limited pallet, thank you, MSG Leum
If you were here, and reading this, you might well be very interested in a jolly terrific film called My Rembrandt: the story of how Jan Six saw a picture in an auction catalogue and strongly felt it was a Rembrandt. One of the persons in this here film, young here, is in the My Rembrandt film--years older. I streamed the film My Rembrandt on a platform called Kanopy, available through public libraries using one's library card #. An aside, I've been gazing at a Chagall picture of a loving couple--it is a sweet homage to the painting discussed in this video: the Jewish Bride of 1664. Thank you for reading and caring. Sweet wishes to you.
My own experience is that how long a mixed paint is left produces various viscosity and is controlled by time alone. Semi dry oil paint is almost sculptural like soft clay and will be thicker to use as a sculptural effect. Also a hit and miss effect creates its own roughness or happy surface,so examination of content makes no difference. It is all the same paint but of differing age.waiting untill the correct stiffness is achieved before applying as a texture finish as fit jewellery highlights ,thay are actually 3 dimensional mini sculptures to which paler colours can be added to lighten or darken.
Temperature also affects the viscosity of oil paint. I once watched a plien air painter, painting a cityscape during a snow storm. The more intense the storm, and drop in the temperature, the thicker the paint became. He literally had to string the paint, or glop it on, in order to add more paint. It was pretty intense, and the painting looked like a blizzard in the end. You could feel the storms energy just looking at the painting.
can you just imagine how that painting ("the jewish bride") would look if it were cleaned.....that yellowed varnish must be obscuring some absolutely amazing colors.
One thing apparently not considered (or mentioned) by these researchers is the role "impurities/ contaminants" played in the effects achieved by artists/craftspeople of all sorts. It's now well known that it is the "impurities" (resins & salts) in the woods and varnishes that make the sound of Stradivarius stringed instruments "unique". I believe this was discovered in the 1980s and so should have been known by them but they didn't acknowledge. Someone in the comments here mentioned the possible effect water-soaking the linseed before pressing out the oil might have. THAT is right to the point. Every manipulation of Rembrandt's materials would have added/ subtracted "impurities" in addition to those he intentionally put in. The analysis done here, while informative, didn't go far enough is all I'm saying.
I really appreciate this wonderful document. I have to say, however, an overemphasis on technique and materials, with an under appreciation of the importance of years of practice and study is revealed. Perhaps, this is one of the secrets of R.'s greatness. In these days, artists attend universities and are expected to graduate a few years later as fully fledged artist. At end the narrator does state that the "unparralleled artistry with which Rembrandt exercised his craft". The rounds out the narrative but seriously under states, I believe, in which mastery (from many long years of practice and study) achieved the result that we see in his works.
What is not mentioned or considered, is that Rembrandt did not paint like a figourative painter does today, which is to paint wet into wet like an impressionast. Instead Rembrandt would paint, and then let it dry and then scumble and glaze over the top of his dried work, let that dry completely and then do another layer over the top again. This is how he built his impasto areas and textures. At every stage he got it right, and then let it dry, and then painted another layer into the dried paint. I am however fascintated to learn about the filler that he used, chalk or ground sand. I did not know that.
Plus, some artists could paint regardless of binder or pigments...the Masters were generally "Savants". They were gifted at painting and sometimes that is something that cannot be taught.
Once somebody plays a song sombody else can play it ...except there are a few people that nobody can copy exactly. This Rembrandt is the best,I might as well throw away my brushes and dump my paint down the sink,I'm am not worthy.
I have read that he also put egg into his paints, as well as glass. I didnt hear this in this research. The evidence of proteins, as well as the lead that was revealed.
I Dont mind knowing masters work methods. I read history when I was doing my masters in art and design, now doing paintings as wel as design work, I don't believe in taking copying methods or reference, but an inspiration and the patience and how much they were dedicated for work of art. That's why they are alive and immortal.
Really, really interessting. I am very sure he uses flour.. also his father was a miller.. it's not about the oil its about the particles and fillers as he says at the end.
Flour would make the paint go mouldy I'm thinking. I'm a painter, I wouldn't use any foodstuffs in my work for that reason. The exception would be egg based emulsion, but that is prepared in a special way.
If linseed in its whole state as a seed is eft to soak in water it will swell and produce a gel around the seed; maybe this was included in the binder? Its interesting the commentary said the pigment was ground and water added first as something would be needed to hold the water or separate it? The natural gel in linseed soak could possibly emulsify the oil and water?
This is a most important video of Rembrandt's techniques. He was absolutely a master of his own magical abilities of applying his paint and the use of the thicknesses that was used in his own creations. One of his most important idiosyncrasies that was used by Rembrandt was of his own style and was used only by him which will prove everything that was created by himself later on down the road. Yes,.... I do believe Rembrandt was the greatest Dutch artist that ever came down the pike until the arrival of one of his adversaries,.... Vincent Willem van Gogh.
This narrator is the first I have ever heard to pronounce “Van Gogh” correctly. Very refreshing. But it horrifies me that the researchers take paint off the painting, no matter how minute the amount of paint removed.
I think this was very natural and normal by that time and other artist at that time and in that places nearby where Rembrandt used to learn all those techniques, they knew about them. The fact that other artists are not famous and neither they were famous at that time could mean a lot of things, like that they have no financial possibilities to continue their work, or to show their work, or to master their skills better or to have the right connections... I'm surprised by his work and I totally accept his superior painting techniques and harmony, but for sure it is hard to re-paint today what he painted almost 400 years ago, not only because the raw materials are changed, but everything has evolved, different techniques are being used today to paint, to get the raw materials, to apply them and definitely, times has changed everything, so it's very complex and maybe impossible to represent the same way what he and others, achieved hundreds of years ago. I would suggest to admire their work and let them be who they are, the greatest of the past centuries, but let us dive into new prospective and way of working, so we can create the paints of tomorrow instead of collecting and copying the history of yesterday.
9:41 I always wondered whether painters had instructions for how to view paintings, what type of lighting to use, etc. and I finally found an example of it here. It's strange to me that even in famous museums the lighting seems standardized, even for different styles of painting. I doubt the painters would want them presented in such a way, but maybe it's easier to compare different paintings under the same lighting/room setup.
its never standard, every painting has different demands, curators meet these with different varieties of light etc. that is essentially part of their main job.
Jeff K i just went to see a Van Gogh exhibit at the Melbourne National Gallery. The lighting was so dim and amber-coloured, it was hard to actually see details properly in the paintings. They were also all covered with glass panes, which made them all sparkly/reflective. To top that off, they were mostly all framed in big, chunky wooden frames that threw a big black shadow across the top, obscuring the entire top 2 inches of each piece. Now i am neither expert or curator. Am sure there are factors I don't understand, and really am happy that I got to a chance to take in VG at his finest, but it definitely detracted from an experience I had been looking forward to for a long time...
I agree, they are totally missing the point of what the team is trying to do, which is to broaden our understanding of how Rembrandt worked and produced his masterpieces.
This was obviously made in the 90s.. I mean the computers.. are so outdated now... and the quality of the video is not HD... But still what a fascinating documentary...
It would be interesting to make an exact copy using some modern techniques. For instance, the surface could be laser scanned to create a topographical duplicate file that could be fed into a CnC machine. The machine would need to be extremely accurate and work in 5 dimensions to capture the textures. Application of color would be very tricky. A high resolution printer would apply it and many trial examples would need to be created until the three dimensional coverage could be achieved. Then I suspect that a final clear coating would need to be applied but it must duplicate different sheens across the surface. What a fun project this would be.
Half black man suffered with his identification...he was supernatural human...he painted what he loved and the way he saw his life through the spiritual scene...and materials that were pure
15:39 to identify the elements , and here they mention 2 of the 3 alchemical primes. Mercury and sulfur. The 3rd is salt , which will be present if the painting was shipped anywhere lol.
Salt is everywhere in Amsterdam, the North sea is close. We have lost a lot over time, alchemy has become a mystery instead of a science for most famous people.
Give a guy a machine and he wants it to give results instead of think. Soak the particles of quartz in the oil mixing right before painting then let the oil in the quartz seep out while drawing some of the pigments in. Gives more of a shine or glow in the light. Leave the quartz in the paint a long time and you saturate with pigments loosing the reflection.
@@tr33m00nk It's not solid quartz rock. It's pulverized quartz so fractured quartz with no matter how small has fissures allowing oil to penetrate into the structure. It's not a chemical solution. It's a few steps above cave wall paintings.
Reminds me of the scientists trying to re-create the specifics of the hunter-gatherers' life by analyzing seeds or grass particles in the petrified turd. If Rembrandt had 1/1000 of the money they now spend on this, he would be a happier man, lived longer, painted more and used more expensive materials. And I seriously doubt he would consider this as a good way of understanding him. BTW. His technique was not on par with somebody like, say, Velazquez. So he was putting layer after layer trying to get the right thing. Oil paint is an emulsion that dries and forms the thin film on the surface. Additional layers don't form a bond strong enough. Hence all that craquelure and dry skin flakes that form a "gorgeous gold brocade".
Pigment is the basis then binders and fillers. .Paint bought in tubes is convenient if one does not have the pigments then this is a type of concentrated sauce to begin with. Making ones own paint , even using tubes ready prepared then modified by the addition of wax , oil, calcium carbonate. ground glass. egg yolk will extend the variable consistency and range of colour of tube paints. The addition of calcium carbonate , sand can also help with relief qualities and quantities of paint in an economical sense. Egg tempera over oil is possible with a ground rubbing of garlic and then oil over this. Devin Roberts below makes the absurd statement that these optical effects can be created with "modern" materials. Yet he produces no evidence. Look at his painting Late night conversations. oil on canvas to see not only stunted drawing but poor optical depth.
Linseed oil - Leave it to harden in the sun for a few days Add Calcium chalk and then add the paint after all the excess oil has been drained out of it, leave it for a day to get tacky.
Beat me to it; they said virtually nothing, but used media-speak to disguise the fact. It is the _handling_ of the paint that matters in this case, not some search for a chimerical mystical ingredient. I guess people want a magical answer which negates pure talent and experience.
I for one am not surprises by the difference in layer upon layer in technique . Could it be due to the need to mix as he went due to $ and availability of such materials that he founded such technique ? As an artist I know how This would be a possibility ,I mean he couldn't just go to store and have exacting duplication of having to mix as you go and creating such works in his hand so to speak developed in by doing . I Am believer of creativity as gift In each of us ,some of us don't keep forward at perfecting our talent some must Endeavor Mastery to it I am Reminded of the " Masters " term to such ?
Imagine if the mass production of paint tubes in the later 19th century and their consistancy had not been intruduced to the art world.... The myriad of different techniques that would have subsequently been created which now, alas, have not. Then again, plein air painting probably wouldnt have reached the heights it did.
The "magic" you refer to is in the artist's consciousness. Analysing materials is interesting but will not inform,however minutely one looks, as to how he did it. This is a matter of the mind and experience. The use of silica was not for "economy" as she suggests. That suggestion is ludicrous.' It was used for its refractive index and body. It refracts light. It is like analyzing in the quantum levels.You know the electrons are there and even behave like objects but you can find them exactly. Same with Rembrandt. Even he was approximately exact and knew the quantum aspects of painting. Same with Leonardo and Turner.
I feel all those x-rays eventually will affect the paintings. I think the answer to the high whites/highlights is heavy metals..lead!..He must have got poisoning by it! .and raw talent for portraiture of course.
@@NEprimo Yes, but as there is no way of knowing, at present, the composition of the water used, one should start using pure water. It's an issue encountered frequently when attempting to recreate something, and it turns out that the original was actually the result of some kind of contamination. This is what happened when scientists recently tried to recreate part of nuclear warheads, specifically a type of foam designed to become plasma after the primary of the warhead detonates. That's right, Rembrandt and nuclear warfare both interest me. The scientists failed until they found that it was the contamination of the original ingredients that created the desired result. Pretty cool, at least to me.
Have you considered that if he were alive today he would not want his methods revealed. If it was something he was happy to share with the world he would have written it. So, out of respect for this great man why not let the mystery continue and let us enjoy his illusion without revealing his secret. I don’t know many magicians who like their magic revealed to the world.
He used flour to thicken his paint, I too have done so with oils and house paint paintings, getting the proper mixture is important 60% oil/40% flour or less. Must mix really well, I'll be doing this again on my next painting.
Good to see Rembrandt is still baffling the experts, astounding the pundits and dazzling the cognoscenti. As a mere fan I consider myself wowed.
This video was posted almost a decade ago and is older than that, take this info as probably updated since.
@@jakesmerth1919Thanks for the head's up.
"Rembrandt must have prepared different portions of paint of varying thicknesses". Everyone who has ever painted in oil collectively says: "Duh?".
I tried to make a copy of his portrait at the beginning. I did not draw it out and got his head too big, then I got frustrated because I could not do it and gave up. I am much better as a painter today but now the canvas is damaged.
Nice to hear a narrator who can actually pronounce Dutch names.
UHMMM thats probably why he is DUTVH you can clearly hear his dinglish accent
I agree, people don't even try to pronounce names at all. Irritating.
The narrators pronunciation of the dutch names was spot on!
He's obviously bilingual (at least) in English and Dutch, as after he speaks names in a Dutch accent, the following couple of words are also tinged in the Dutch accent. He also lets the Dutch accent slip throughout if you concentrate. You can tell this quite often when he says 'paint, or words with 'r' constanant.
Fifty years ago, I had the pleasure of taking a self-guided tour of the Rijksmuseum that hold many of the paintings of the
Dutch Masters. As an amateur artist, I was mesmerized by the careful style & craftsmanship of their paintings that delivered an intimate sense of presence and realism. The intricate paint strokes created a grand illusion. Their period in art history was captured with the high-style clothing and artifacts of their time, distinctly marking early Enlightenment with a magical blend of art and science! Those paintings also showed the Masters' patience that few modern people could endure, even with the zen-like mental transcendence that often pulls the artist into a different world.
I carefully studied Rembrandt's 'The Black Watch', 'The Jewish Bride', and other oils by him and other Masters. Meanwhile, my wife was tugging me to move along as I gazed! It was an amazing experience to see up close & personal much of the greatest art ever!
There is a Museum in Sarasota Florida, The Ringling Museum. On the Gulf of Mexico. They have an assembly if different Art Deco buildings and a mansion called Cadzan. Very beautiful grounds. Their Masters Paintings are fantastic. That building takes a day to walk through. You would really enjoy it.
Even with the high tech of today we fail to come anywhere close to the magic of Rembrandt.
They used camera obscura.
I'm amazed that they were allowed to get SO close to the paintings. Mind you - this piece of film is over 30 years old.
The Master still a magician but some more clues to his magic tricks... Amazing!
Everybody marvelling at the correct ( Dutch) pronounciation of "van Gogh"; the narrator is definitely Dutch (based on his thick Dutch accent).
I know it's not the "exact" same, but as I watched this, it just reminded me of really gifted chefs -- they are also gardeners and understand their ingredients. The brilliance (imo) of using sand to create light effects. I really enjoyed this documentary, and appreciate all of the effort of everyone.
Funny guy
Temperature also affects oil paint viscosity. I watched a plein air painter paint a cityscape, as a snow storm started. The paint got thicker as the snow came down faster and faster, and as the temperature dropped. Near the end of the painting, the painter had to string out the paint onto the canvas, or glop it on. The painting really did look like a city in a blizzard. I dont know how he did it. I've bundled up, and tried painting during just a light fluffy snow, and could only manage maybe 45 minutes, or an hour tops.
Through the sciences we get great insight into the pigments and binders , but the actual materials he used is still a secret . This tells me one thing , he was an alchemist as well. His need to use textures to convey his dimensional effect, as well as working with light shadow and distance was unique and pioneering.
I'll bet he had several resin types added to the paint. Pinetrees and coniferes produce this
Alchemy from which we get the word chemistry literally means 'Out of Egypt.' Science is as old as the hills.
@Janitor Queen meh, what's the diff ... (hides his face in shame) ;-P
@Janitor Queen No harm done and yeah, I was sloppy with my translation skills in th'm dayz ... ;-D
'home schooled', you know . And I'm really not so easily offended after so many years drifting on You Tube.
Ever since I was 5 years old, I wanted to speak and write English. Now that I'm sixty I still make those stjoopid mistakes 🤣
Rembrandt...the Greatest of them all......
Hi
when I was at art school there was a lot of interest in old master's painting methodology, and I distinctly remember that cold pressed linseed oil was supposed to have been left to thicken for several days , or maybe even weeks, in sunlight, to enable linoxin to form.The effect on the oil would have apparently been superior to boiling it, as that browns it too much.
I'm pretty sure that Rembrandt allowed his paint to thicken over weeks. He would have mixed it daily until it was ready.
I think what you're referring to is stand oil. I had a teacher who really liked it but I never got on with it. He was really into scumble-like effects but I always wanted a smooth, creamy texture.
Sun-thickened linseed oil.
@mister kluge I just looked up what stand oil is and the article claimed it's a group of products. Whatever, I didn't like it but the artist who did was Bruce Samuelson.
This reminds me of Werner Herzog's Kaspar Hauser, when the scholars couldn't rest until they knew what was going on in Kaspar's brain. Let it go people. Rembrandt was a genius... he was magical. Let it go and enjoy his work.
It's actually most amazing that his paintings held up. By using thicker paint to produce texture, there seems to be more area that may be affected by time. Cleaning such paintings must have been especially difficult.
Very good. Thanks for the upload.
This presentation and research methods, and final conclusions are astounding, and as a novice portrait painter, trying to capture some of the feelings and gestures of a few of his self-portraits, I have so much greater respect for his work, but as you said, even this opens us up to even more questions, this was so incredibly wonderful and helpful, especially when you specified that he worked with a limited pallet, thank you,
MSG Leum
If you were here, and reading this, you might well be very interested in a jolly terrific film called My Rembrandt: the story of how Jan Six saw a picture in an auction catalogue and strongly felt it was a Rembrandt. One of the persons in this here film, young here, is in the My Rembrandt film--years older. I streamed the film My Rembrandt on a platform called Kanopy, available through public libraries using one's library card #. An aside, I've been gazing at a Chagall picture of a loving couple--it is a sweet homage to the painting discussed in this video: the Jewish Bride of 1664. Thank you for reading and caring. Sweet wishes to you.
Very interesting, yes particles along add to reflective properties. Love the idea of limited palettes per passage. Always systems!
My own experience is that how long a mixed paint is left produces various viscosity and is controlled by time alone. Semi dry oil paint is almost sculptural like soft clay and will be thicker to use as a sculptural effect. Also a hit and miss effect creates its own roughness or happy surface,so examination of content makes no difference. It is all the same paint but of differing age.waiting untill the correct stiffness is achieved before applying as a texture finish as fit jewellery highlights ,thay are actually 3 dimensional mini sculptures to which paler colours can be added to lighten or darken.
Temperature also affects the viscosity of oil paint. I once watched a plien air painter, painting a cityscape during a snow storm. The more intense the storm, and drop in the temperature, the thicker the paint became. He literally had to string the paint, or glop it on, in order to add more paint. It was pretty intense, and the painting looked like a blizzard in the end. You could feel the storms energy just looking at the painting.
fascinating documentary...quite thought-provoking.
Very interesting experiments, I hope this goes further, thank you.
Very interesting. My friend taught me so much about Art. I will be learning more.
can you just imagine how that painting ("the jewish bride") would look if it were cleaned.....that yellowed varnish must be obscuring some absolutely amazing colors.
One thing apparently not considered (or mentioned) by these researchers is the role "impurities/ contaminants" played in the effects achieved by artists/craftspeople of all sorts. It's now well known that it is the "impurities" (resins & salts) in the woods and varnishes that make the sound of Stradivarius stringed instruments "unique". I believe this was discovered in the 1980s and so should have been known by them but they didn't acknowledge. Someone in the comments here mentioned the possible effect water-soaking the linseed before pressing out the oil might have. THAT is right to the point. Every manipulation of Rembrandt's materials would have added/ subtracted "impurities" in addition to those he intentionally put in. The analysis done here, while informative, didn't go far enough is all I'm saying.
I really appreciate this wonderful document. I have to say, however, an overemphasis on technique and materials, with an under appreciation of the importance of years of practice and study is revealed. Perhaps, this is one of the secrets of R.'s greatness. In these days, artists attend universities and are expected to graduate a few years later as fully fledged artist. At end the narrator does state that the "unparralleled artistry with which Rembrandt exercised his craft". The rounds out the narrative but seriously under states, I believe, in which mastery (from many long years of practice and study) achieved the result that we see in his works.
Absolutely right. Look at John Myatt's works which sold at the major auction houses as original oil paintings, and were done with acrylic house paint.
magnificent brilliant thank you
What is not mentioned or considered, is that Rembrandt did not paint like a figourative painter does today, which is to paint wet into wet like an impressionast. Instead Rembrandt would paint, and then let it dry and then scumble and glaze over the top of his dried work, let that dry completely and then do another layer over the top again. This is how he built his impasto areas and textures. At every stage he got it right, and then let it dry, and then painted another layer into the dried paint. I am however fascintated to learn about the filler that he used, chalk or ground sand. I did not know that.
Plus, some artists could paint regardless of binder or pigments...the Masters were generally "Savants". They were gifted at painting and sometimes that is something that cannot be taught.
Once somebody plays a song sombody else can play it ...except there are a few people that nobody can copy exactly. This Rembrandt is the best,I might as well throw away my brushes and dump my paint down the sink,I'm am not worthy.
That's an old documentary 1993....but still great to watch
All I know is that Rembrandt made his own paint and added different kinds of particle size in order to mimic textures like cloth or wood.
I have read that he also put egg into his paints, as well as glass. I didnt hear this in this research. The evidence of proteins, as well as the lead that was revealed.
I Dont mind knowing masters work methods. I read history when I was doing my masters in art and design, now doing paintings as wel as design work, I don't believe in taking copying methods or reference, but an inspiration and the patience and how much they were dedicated for work of art. That's why they are alive and immortal.
Beautiful!! Is there a HD version I can find somewhere online?? Thank you
love the action scenes
Really, really interessting. I am very sure he uses flour.. also his father was a miller.. it's not about the oil its about the particles and fillers as he says at the end.
Flour would make the paint go mouldy I'm thinking. I'm a painter, I wouldn't use any foodstuffs in my work for that reason. The exception would be egg based emulsion, but that is prepared in a special way.
If linseed in its whole state as a seed is eft to soak in water it will swell and produce a gel around the seed; maybe this was included in the binder? Its interesting the commentary said the pigment was ground and water added first as something would be needed to hold the water or separate it? The natural gel in linseed soak could possibly emulsify the oil and water?
this is like trying to look at a celestial galaxy through a "Microscope"
Amazing work.
Sooo interesting!
This is a most important video of Rembrandt's techniques. He was absolutely a master of his own magical abilities of applying his paint and the use of the thicknesses that was used in his own creations. One of his most important idiosyncrasies that was used by Rembrandt was of his own style and was used only by him which will prove everything that was created by himself later on down the road. Yes,.... I do believe Rembrandt was the greatest Dutch artist that ever came down the pike until the arrival of one of his adversaries,.... Vincent Willem van Gogh.
Adversaries isn't really the word.
This narrator is the first I have ever heard to pronounce “Van Gogh” correctly. Very refreshing. But it horrifies me that the researchers take paint off the painting, no matter how minute the amount of paint removed.
I think this was very natural and normal by that time and other artist at that time and in that places nearby where Rembrandt used to learn all those techniques, they knew about them.
The fact that other artists are not famous and neither they were famous at that time could mean a lot of things, like that they have no financial possibilities to continue their work, or to show their work, or to master their skills better or to have the right connections...
I'm surprised by his work and I totally accept his superior painting techniques and harmony, but for sure it is hard to re-paint today what he painted almost 400 years ago, not only because the raw materials are changed, but everything has evolved, different techniques are being used today to paint, to get the raw materials, to apply them and definitely, times has changed everything, so it's very complex and maybe impossible to represent the same way what he and others, achieved hundreds of years ago.
I would suggest to admire their work and let them be who they are, the greatest of the past centuries, but let us dive into new prospective and way of working, so we can create the paints of tomorrow instead of collecting and copying the history of yesterday.
No, they actually coveted their painting methods quite secretly, Art History 101
I paint with my face to Canvas with New Medium Theater Facepaint & Charge $1 Per minute & first work just hit 1,000,000 Minutes.
thank you for good information
9:41 I always wondered whether painters had instructions for how to view paintings, what type of lighting to use, etc. and I finally found an example of it here. It's strange to me that even in famous museums the lighting seems standardized, even for different styles of painting. I doubt the painters would want them presented in such a way, but maybe it's easier to compare different paintings under the same lighting/room setup.
its never standard, every painting has different demands, curators meet these with different varieties of light etc. that is essentially part of their main job.
Jeff K i just went to see a Van Gogh exhibit at the Melbourne National Gallery. The lighting was so dim and amber-coloured, it was hard to actually see details properly in the paintings. They were also all covered with glass panes, which made them all sparkly/reflective. To top that off, they were mostly all framed in big, chunky wooden frames that threw a big black shadow across the top, obscuring the entire top 2 inches of each piece. Now i am neither expert or curator. Am sure there are factors I don't understand, and really am happy that I got to a chance to take in VG at his finest, but it definitely detracted from an experience I had been looking forward to for a long time...
Fascinating documentary. I don't understand all of the critical comments.
I agree, they are totally missing the point of what the team is trying to do, which is to broaden our understanding of how Rembrandt worked and produced his masterpieces.
Superb
Is that windmill still in use in 2019 ? It would be cool to take a tour of it ☺ maybe buy some paint made there 😃
This was obviously made in the 90s.. I mean the computers.. are so outdated now... and the quality of the video is not HD... But still what a fascinating documentary...
It would be interesting to make an exact copy using some modern techniques. For instance, the surface could be laser scanned to create a topographical duplicate file that could be fed into a CnC machine. The machine would need to be extremely accurate and work in 5 dimensions to capture the textures. Application of color would be very tricky. A high resolution printer would apply it and many trial examples would need to be created until the three dimensional coverage could be achieved. Then I suspect that a final clear coating would need to be applied but it must duplicate different sheens across the surface. What a fun project this would be.
Joy indeed
I started to educate myself from the moment I got this i pad
16:30 - that point typing!
😂in style with his car
wonderful. thank you
that painting is notable for the paint and the girl, but that fella next to her is like a poke in the eye.
😍👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻thank you
Amazing documentary. Does anyone know when it was made? Looks like the eighties.
Early 90's.
great
What was the actual particle size of the pigment pls
it would have been nice to start this video at "THE BEGINNING"
13:37 *moves around TV antenna*
than217 boom headshot
This is all fine and dandy, but has anyone found my missing poodle?
Half black man suffered with his identification...he was supernatural human...he painted what he loved and the way he saw his life through the spiritual scene...and materials that were pure
15:39 to identify the elements , and here they mention 2 of the 3 alchemical primes. Mercury and sulfur.
The 3rd is salt , which will be present if the painting was shipped anywhere lol.
Salt is everywhere in Amsterdam, the North sea is close. We have lost a lot over time, alchemy has become a mystery instead of a science for most famous people.
Very interesting.
Give a guy a machine and he wants it to give results instead of think. Soak the particles of quartz in the oil mixing right before painting then let the oil in the quartz seep out while drawing some of the pigments in. Gives more of a shine or glow in the light. Leave the quartz in the paint a long time and you saturate with pigments loosing the reflection.
Oil 'soaking into' and 'seeping out of' quartz? Perhaps you should improve your knowledge of physical chemistry.
@@tr33m00nk It's not solid quartz rock. It's pulverized quartz so fractured quartz with no matter how small has fissures allowing oil to penetrate into the structure. It's not a chemical solution. It's a few steps above cave wall paintings.
Reminds me of the scientists trying to re-create the specifics of the hunter-gatherers' life by analyzing seeds or grass particles in the petrified turd. If Rembrandt had 1/1000 of the money they now spend on this, he would be a happier man, lived longer, painted more and used more expensive materials. And I seriously doubt he would consider this as a good way of understanding him. BTW. His technique was not on par with somebody like, say, Velazquez. So he was putting layer after layer trying to get the right thing. Oil paint is an emulsion that dries and forms the thin film on the surface. Additional layers don't form a bond strong enough. Hence all that craquelure and dry skin flakes that form a "gorgeous gold brocade".
did those two really carry a rembrandt outside unprotected?
G E its a reproduction
no
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Pigment is the basis then binders and fillers. .Paint bought in tubes is convenient if one does not have the pigments then this is a type of concentrated sauce to begin with. Making ones own paint , even using tubes ready prepared then modified by the addition of wax , oil, calcium carbonate. ground glass. egg yolk will extend the variable consistency and range of colour of tube paints. The addition of calcium carbonate , sand can also help with relief qualities and quantities of paint in an economical sense. Egg tempera over oil is possible with a ground rubbing of garlic and then oil over this. Devin Roberts below makes the absurd statement that these optical effects can be created with "modern" materials. Yet he produces no evidence. Look at his painting Late night conversations. oil on canvas to see not only stunted drawing but poor optical depth.
Yes, I'm thinking garlic would discourage mould to form, where egg is involved.
👍👍👍
a friend had a formula used by R. Where he got it dont recall, but it was kind of a secret one gathered.
Linseed oil - Leave it to harden in the sun for a few days
Add Calcium chalk and then add the paint after all the excess oil has been drained out of it, leave it for a day to get tacky.
Jamie Xavier check out calcite sun oil , and the name Louis Velasquez.
You know this documentary was from the 80s when it showed you the computer thickness and boy!! Sure The computer was sooooo thick 😁😂💻😀
Lol I realized it was old when I saw them getting out of the cab in the beginning. Back when cars were cars! 😁
Oooo these pixel peepers of analog epoch...
Nothing new here that a good artist does not already know
Beat me to it; they said virtually nothing, but used media-speak to disguise the fact.
It is the _handling_ of the paint that matters in this case, not some search for a chimerical mystical ingredient. I guess people want a magical answer which negates pure talent and experience.
I may have found a Rembrandt. Can you help me know?
So I misread the title. I thought it said, “ Rembrandt and his pants.”
❤❤❤❤❤
I’m imaging Rembrandt watching this manificent documentary. 😅
and rolling around in his grave
I for one am not surprises by the difference in layer upon layer in technique . Could it be due to the need to mix as he went due to $ and availability of such materials that he founded such technique ? As an artist I know how
This would be a possibility ,I mean he couldn't just go to store and have exacting duplication of having to mix as you go and creating such works in his hand so to speak developed in by doing . I Am believer of creativity as gift
In each of us ,some of us don't keep forward at perfecting our talent some must Endeavor Mastery to it I am
Reminded of the " Masters " term to such ?
The paint is laid thet deep in small bumps that they cast shadows
Imagine if the mass production of paint tubes in the later 19th century and their consistancy had not been intruduced to the art world.... The myriad of different techniques that would have subsequently been created which now, alas, have not.
Then again, plein air painting probably wouldnt have reached the heights it did.
The "magic" you refer to is in the artist's consciousness. Analysing materials is interesting but will not inform,however minutely one looks, as to how he did it.
This is a matter of the mind and experience.
The use of silica was not for "economy" as she suggests. That suggestion is ludicrous.' It was used for its refractive index and body. It refracts light.
It is like analyzing in the quantum levels.You know the electrons are there and even behave like objects but you can find them exactly.
Same with Rembrandt. Even he was approximately exact and knew the quantum aspects of painting.
Same with Leonardo and Turner.
if only old paintings could talk. artist of long ago were masters.
+Darlene Ferree dont be silly
+Constantino Fine Art what makes u think I'm being silly?
+Constantino Fine Art How is that silly. You silly
+Zee L thank you
+Darlene Ferree ..Painting do talk in their own language.
Rembrandt looks like Rumpole!
it was made with lead white
Top! Sur ses premières peintures on comprend qu il était a la limite du caricaturiste!
I feel all those x-rays eventually will affect the paintings. I think the answer to the high whites/highlights is heavy metals..lead!..He must have got poisoning by it! .and raw talent for portraiture of course.
Ask Odd Nerdrum, how to paint like Rembrandt.
I read the title as Rembrandt and His Pants, which would be a much different video, I'm sure.
They should look at them again since this video looks 30 yrs old
I doubt Rembrandt washed his oil in distilled water
A. I doubt that as well
I don't think that method works very well for washing oil
I'm pretty sure they had far better methods
A. Perhaps they should have used local well water or aquifer samples from the area that Rembrandt may have got his water. Any rate, good thinking!
@@NEprimo Yes, but as there is no way of knowing, at present, the composition of the water used, one should start using pure water. It's an issue encountered frequently when attempting to recreate something, and it turns out that the original was actually the result of some kind of contamination. This is what happened when scientists recently tried to recreate part of nuclear warheads, specifically a type of foam designed to become plasma after the primary of the warhead detonates. That's right, Rembrandt and nuclear warfare both interest me. The scientists failed until they found that it was the contamination of the original ingredients that created the desired result. Pretty cool, at least to me.
They should remake this documentary with 2019 haircuts
The background music makes me feel like I’m watching a video on ufo’s or some other mythical mysterious subject.
Have you considered that if he were alive today he would not want his methods revealed. If it was something he was happy to share with the world he would have written it. So, out of respect for this great man why not let the mystery continue and let us enjoy his illusion without revealing his secret. I don’t know many magicians who like their magic revealed to the world.
Didn't know !!! I know why they burn so much when I have spray water base paint !!!
I'm laughing. Lol. "It was hard work?" You're kidding.
He used flour to thicken his paint, I too have done so with oils and house paint paintings, getting the proper mixture is important 60% oil/40% flour or less. Must mix really well, I'll be doing this again on my next painting.
you mean they didn't go to Hobby Lobby?
Jacqueline Benoit-Larsen yea, laugh out loud 😂 can you imagine Rembrandt going to Hobby Lobby or Michael's?
Painful and sad image.
This just in: Old “Remy” orders Grumbacher oil paints through “Amazon Prime”...