I saw one review who has professional photography experience and he explained details in Sony this video comparison is good for non techie and no knowledge in photography
The Sony also has many features no other smartphone has. 1. A dedicated shutter button with rock solid autofocus and eye tracking 2. A dedicated mini jack audio in and out port. 3. A 1.5 TB micro SD card slot. 4. A physical sim slot as well as e-sim. 4. No notch or camera hole on the screen which is a stunning display, arguably the best smartphone for watching a movie on. 5. 2 forward facing speakers. 6. Unbeatable wireless audio with full support for high fidelity audio (especially great with Sony's top end wireless over ear headphones.
Yes, but why not simply buy a Sony camera, and avoid all the usual Sony mobile device software update problems that are well documented all over the internet?.
As an ex-Sony 1V user, I totally disagree with you. I'm a photographer, and the only useful lens is the main lens; all the other lenses are totally trash. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra Pro mode is miles better than the Sony manual photo results.
You forgot to add that the Sony is capable of 4k 120fps on ALL lenses, not just the main lens. Samsung is only able to shoot 4k 120fps on its main lens.
@@exfx8315 who cares:) the tele lens is useless for 120fps 4k, small sensor bad quality,. The UWW is a small sensor too, but it's a bit better than the zoom lens. If you want a good quality you have to shoot 120fps 4k with the main lense. Like others. In real life I have never used the other sensors for 120fps, only the main. Like 99% the other people do.
@@18yearsago88 I never said you could. My point was that the most average consumers aren't true photographers and won't transfer their videos on to a 4K capable device from their phone. All these specs are brainwashing people who are making a decision to buy an overpriced device based off of features they'll never use.
@@RAGINGINSOMNIA-o8e Agree, Galaxy AI is just a gimmick, no one would use it in real life. It's there to sway people into buying it even though it's a downgrade from the S23 Ultra.
On my Xperia 1V I have the exposure set to -0.7 by default, otherwise almost all shots come out overexposed. It's so weird that Sony is incapable of fixing this issue
the overexposure is caused by the face/eye AF. It tends to expose the face of the subject when it detects one. Face/eye AF prioritizes exposure on the face and just ignore everything else. Turn it off and the results are different. Sony's maybe thinking that everyone shoots in raw and process the image later. 😂
i have been an xperia user for last 6 years. One thing i can tell you guys. With the iphones and samsungs and other phones, the phone decides how the pictures will be and you pretty much cannot do anything to make it the way you want it to look. Whereas In the sony YOU choose how you want it to look. Sony is for the person who knows what exactly their pictures should look like. All the other phones are for people who don't mind the phone controlling their pictures' looks as long as the user looks good in the pictures. It is like choosing to make a home cooked meal where each and every ingredient is chosen by you, vs eating at a restaurant. There is no way someone doesn't like how restaurant food tastes. But sure one can mess up a home cooked meal.
@@ÑôusyyļIeù It's not a myth. I'm a professional photographer using a Nikon system as my main system and the xperia when I don't have the Nikon with me. If you're talking about some level of processing, then it is very debatable. Because then even if you're shouting film, the chemicals in the film and the processing method will determine how the prints will turn out. So no matter what camera you use. Each and every camera "processes" the look and can never exactly reproduce the real scene.
Enough yapping bro i also have xperia 1 mark 3 my friend have 1 mark 5 and my friend is a photographer he recommend me sony phone we bought our phones same day and we both were disappointed by the camera even a photographer Who uses sony phone says camera is bad
in the stock app maybe, but you can shoot more natural photos on other devices too. Also Sony doesn't give their better sensors for UW and zoom. It's a pity as they do many things right
Not just that it’s much better build quality than other Android. I have a iPhone 14 Pro and recently picked a S24 and replacing the S24 with Sony as well.
I have used both brands for the last 20+ years and Sony is more aesthetic in design both hardware and user interface. My current Xperia 1 iii phone never needed any visits to the service center since I bought it 3 years ago. It is more reliable than Samsung. Recently purchased Xperia 1 VI online and can hardly wait to use it.
What the, you guys missed the 2X macro tele the Xperia 1 VI able to reach that Samsung and iPhone can't and the Xperia optically reach 7.2 and you guys compare it base on Samsung's reach and not each other advantage sides!
it's a real world camera use comparison, most people in the real world aren't gna use only upto 7.2x if they can go further, and telemacro is basically useless
@@TheOneDanTek Telemacro has a 100% guarantee that it will be less distorted, and it isn't an image crop like from the Ultra wide, neither does your phone ruin your light soruce while shooting Telemacro.
@@TheOneDanTek in that logic, you will zoom into 100x, you buy the phone, you know it's limitation, you don't use it for what it don't have and what other phone have, this phone reached optically only to 7.1x so you use it that way and only further digitally when you have to, your logic is so flaw, what if the older phone that don't have zoom at all, you are so wrong
@@fa14bi-78 noone really uses macro, i personally have to take a pic of a bug, and that was once, but most normal people aint gna use macro for nothing
@@NetvoTV you typed that in one of the most confusing ways possible, but this is what i understood it as. your saying that because the s24u can zoom upto 100x, i will regularly use 100x, which i, personally, will, but most people wont. they may go further than 5x but no more than maybe 20x. if you bought the sony you might go more than 7.2x but no more 15x. in short im saying that just because the best quality is 5 or 7.2x, doesnt mean people are only going to go up to those numbers if they buy that phone
you Didn't mention that Xperia 1vi can recording slow motion 4k 120fps in all lenses But Samsung s24 ultra only with 1 lense However, a point is awarded to Samsung Because recording full hd 240 fps ? Reasons like these make people think that Xperia phones is Weak In fact Xperia phones Oppressed
Since I want something other than a Samsung that still supports a memory card and a headphone jack, the Xperia 1 VI is the best option out there right now.
@@ricianobommel4298 just because Samsung uses Sony sensors don't make partners. They are competitors only Samsung is focusing on the average consumers while Sony is focusing on a niche market. They have a headphone jack, sd slot and an uninterrupted screen. To get great shots you'll have to manually adjust. But imo they've made a mistake with the 1vi. As that niche wants a 4k 21:9 screen
@@ricianobommel4298lmfao , actually not ,,, Sony is for photography, you need some time and the photo would be better than Samsung. Sony has basically better picture quality than samsung. Sony has much better colour processing than samsung also more manual tweaking features , she didn't even mention the best features of sony . Definitely a baised video .
If you guys think photos are not colourful on Sony there's a Vivid option in the Creative Looks part. It's not over saturated but is a bit more closer to real life colours. On the other hand, the default mode for this is Standard which is basically Sony Alpha camera settings for editing later. There's a Natural mode too although unsure it's real life colours or some kind of natural rendition of colours. Either way that's a tip or two I guess 🤷🏻♂️
Why does Samsung get a point for looking more natural, isn't that personal preference? Also you barely talked about the Macro mode, there's a big difference between the both of them, one is with the Ultrawide and the other with the Telephoto. Happy that this video exists but it feels like a lot is missing.
@@synak1538 Lmao just take a picture in 200 mpx (on the Samsung) and crop in it 🤷🏻♂️. No need for any macro mode. And yes i used it on some phones and at first it was amazing but then after 2 days i never used it again 🤣. In my opinion telephoto lens is way more useful than putting your phone up against some food or whatever. Completely useless like i said.
@@alexgreg152 then you don’t understand my original comment. Sonys Macro Mode uses the Telephoto Sensor whereas Samsung uses the Ultrawide, which is why I said there is a big difference.
i think a software update can fix the white balance and exposure compensation metrics......this time sony had touted a better improved telephoto lens from 85 to 170 mm but i think it needs more improvement and sharpening....the audio also got a boost but slightly pales in comparison with the galaxy......nice work.....👍
the overexposure is caused by the face/eye AF. It tends to expose the face of the subject when it detects one. Face/eye AF prioritizes exposure on the face and just ignore everything else. Turn it off and the results are different. Sony's maybe thinking that everyone shoots in raw and process the image later. 😂
I think this channel is biased towards Samsung and for some reason they are tarnishing Sony phones because I have seen with my own eyes that Sony's colors are more realistic and natural than Samsung's. How is it the opposite in this video? Unfortunately this channel has no credibility in comparison, especially since Sony is a party to it.
Weird they didn't say anything about Xperia 1 VI's Telezoom Macro. It blows all the competition out of the water. Still, as others also say - the Sony is better for the people leaning towards photography.- I sold my S24 Ultra to get the Xperia 1 VI, and I haven't regret it. I love the Samsung, but as a wannabe photographer, there is just more that I appreciate with the Sony. First, and most easily, the dedicated proper shutterbutten. You half-press it to focus, and then complete-press it to shoot. I love that. And of course it's auto-focus capabilities is beyond compare.
What?? Samsung colors are more realistic and natural than Sony?? According to tests, Sony has the best colors and realistic images. How did the opposite happen in your comparison!! And as for the portrait, how did this happen with you? I tried the device and I did not have these problems!! I think this channel is not credible
The over exposure on the Sony is not really acceptable considering it's price; but can the exposure be manually changed even when in auto mode?. I can do this on my S23 Ultra, and this ability is invaluable to me when shooting video outdoors especially.
Hi there! What I would like to see on your comparisons is more zoom shots, not just only one, because this way it is hard to tell which one is actually better.
Did not mention and compare 30 fps, eye tracking, animal eye tracking AI, ergonomics movement AI tracking capability Telemacro capability. Sunlight vision test both displays under sun.
@@carver9312 even my s20 fe 5g is better and there is Hdr 10 video mode makes details less sharpend and lights more realstic also i have motion camera pro app its capture Raw video in selfi and back cameras in raw details are comparable with dslr
@@carver9312I guess someone who doesn't know how professional photography works. Go try a professional camera and let us see if you can perfectly expose all scenery.
There is something wrong with this comparison.. I have seen comparisons between Sony and Samsung on other channels and Sony was better, specifically in the nature of colors. How is it in your comparison that it was the opposite?? I think you do not have credibility in the comparison and it is clear that you are biased towards Samsung.. I use the Xperia 1 Mark 4 and from my experience the colors of the Sony camera are much better than Samsung. The only thing that Samsung excels in over Sony is the zoom and portrait
Sony must start working more on software, it cannot compete only with hardware, since mobile phones are too small to be able to properly exploit the capabilities of the hardware
Do u ever used a professional camera? Sony is not for u. It’s only for pro users and photographers who can take photos like a pro. It’s not for clicking in auto mode 😅
Would also say on video the Sony looks more stabilized over the Samsung... later on in your video I would say its the same, its only marginal, On the camera, there is different settings or modes to cope for different colours which you don't show here... Samsungs Ai is very odd... and also starts inventing, photos of the moon it uses that to layer other moon images on it... For me its Sony.. as theres more things you didn't mention... SD card... headphone jack... 2 day battery life...
Sony smartphones are not for every user. its function as a smartphone with a pro camera where you can make all the adjustments almost like a professional camera, no other smartphone can have this function. Sony manages to do this masterfully. Its cameras are not configured in standard AI mode like iPhone Samsung and Xiaomi and other models.
Sony is incredible if it's about manual camera settings which beats all phones. It's for someone who knows how to use manual set while Samsung is for those who use auto all the time
Not understand. You are say about better job at shadows in Samsung, but this is not real. Other - you are say about Samsung better job portrait, but your skin tone in real life like sony make)
That's why Sony cannot keep up, always left behind compared to Apple, Samsung, Pixel, and even with Some Chinese brands. People need reliable auto mode to take a quick picture. Imagine adjusting the manual settings everytime you want to take a picture, how many best moments you will miss.
Rubbish. Professionals use pro cameras, and steer clear of any device from Sony as a mobile back up device due to their ridiculous price and awful software support and quality. Most skilled photographers choose Chinese flagships as back up devices, as they are cheaper and possess vastly superior hardware.
You must be color-blind to give Crapsung any point for a true to life photography! Sony never listened to its die hard fans to improve their JPEG's processing and its HDR, but still it's better! This test is much too subjective and useless overall...
Reviews from professional photographers always turned out to be sponsored by Sony. I can't find even one unbiased review from a professional photographer.
@ 3:50 you look like a villain on Samsung portrait mode. I think that's more concerning than some shirt details. Sony exposes portrait mode for face, that's why it's blowing out.
Samsung colors are more realistic and natural than Sony?? How!! I tried both phones through my friends who own those phones and the result was that Sony's photos were more natural than Samsung's. How is it that in your comparison the opposite happens!! Mr. Channel Owner, did Samsung pay you to do this video or do you have a personal problem with Sony? 😂😂 Also when I tried the portrait, the problems that strangely appeared in this comparison did not appear to me.. This channel does not have credibility and neutrality in the comparison
Unfair competition. 😂😂.. Ai camera from samsung vs Real Camera System from Sony. If you compare the camera make sure to compare every capabilities like the PRO mode. Also when it comes to zoom, sony only uses 7.5x at its best because we all know samsung uses ai to every lenses for zooming 😂 better not compare it.
One thing I noticed about this channel is that they occasionally missed out on several important phone features from their deduction...and I have watched a few. But I get it, Samsung won at run and gun scenarios. If people wanted to justify fiddling manual settings like iso shutter speeds, strapping on an ND filter then why bother, just get an actual camera. Samsung won this round. Out of all Android manufacturer, Samsung IMHO have the best software optimisation/features second to iPhones.
To the viewers of this video. Its a couple that love Samsung galaxy and no matter how horrible the photos were done by samsung, it was given at least a tie if not samsung plus 1. Its not a reference video!
![It can do it all: Sony Xperia 1 VI [review]](/img/n.gif)
It's funny that you give Samsung color scores when Sony always maintains color fidelity
I saw one review who has professional photography experience and he explained details in Sony this video comparison is good for non techie and no knowledge in photography
went with the xperia, such a good device, sd card and jack too!
The Sony also has many features no other smartphone has. 1. A dedicated shutter button with rock solid autofocus and eye tracking 2. A dedicated mini jack audio in and out port. 3. A 1.5 TB micro SD card slot. 4. A physical sim slot as well as e-sim. 4. No notch or camera hole on the screen which is a stunning display, arguably the best smartphone for watching a movie on. 5. 2 forward facing speakers. 6. Unbeatable wireless audio with full support for high fidelity audio (especially great with Sony's top end wireless over ear headphones.
as a xperia user it's not much suitable for straight out phone photo people. for those people who love photography, such an excellent device!
Exactly, it's not for normal users. Sony said it's made for photographers not dumb people like this woman
bcoz' most people only point and shoot. .
For people who loves photograpy, must use ViVO-OPPO-Xiaomi. Sony loser even in pro mode
Yes, but why not simply buy a Sony camera, and avoid all the usual Sony mobile device software update problems that are well documented all over the internet?.
As an ex-Sony 1V user, I totally disagree with you. I'm a photographer, and the only useful lens is the main lens; all the other lenses are totally trash. The Xiaomi 14 Ultra Pro mode is miles better than the Sony manual photo results.
You forgot to add that the Sony is capable of 4k 120fps on ALL lenses, not just the main lens. Samsung is only able to shoot 4k 120fps on its main lens.
@@exfx8315 who cares:) the tele lens is useless for 120fps 4k, small sensor bad quality,. The UWW is a small sensor too, but it's a bit better than the zoom lens. If you want a good quality you have to shoot 120fps 4k with the main lense. Like others. In real life I have never used the other sensors for 120fps, only the main. Like 99% the other people do.
You can't even watch 4K on the Sony screen.
You can't on samsung either ???😊@@RAGINGINSOMNIA-o8e
@@18yearsago88 I never said you could. My point was that the most average consumers aren't true photographers and won't transfer their videos on to a 4K capable device from their phone. All these specs are brainwashing people who are making a decision to buy an overpriced device based off of features they'll never use.
@@RAGINGINSOMNIA-o8e Agree, Galaxy AI is just a gimmick, no one would use it in real life. It's there to sway people into buying it even though it's a downgrade from the S23 Ultra.
Completely disregarding the telemacro capabilities of 1 VI is criminal
Why is color exaggeration an advantage and color accuracy for Galaxy, but it's a negative score for Xperia? This type of scoring is questionable
What do you expect from that woman? Totally bias comparison
This is the worst and most superficial comparison I have seen. Not even mentioning the telemacro mode and pro mode of the Sony.
Just accept the result and pray that Sony can improve their software quality. It can even over expose in macro mode by the way.
Sony is garbage & outdated, even plastic fans like you won't buy it.
@@neilmcguinness4422 samsung fanboy
Cause 90% the auto mode is used.....and the pro mode is only a half pro mode without a variable aperture.
And Sony overexposes everywhere 😂
Sony is garbage, just accept it
On my Xperia 1V I have the exposure set to -0.7 by default, otherwise almost all shots come out overexposed. It's so weird that Sony is incapable of fixing this issue
The reason of why I personally don't like Sony phones. They software are weird.
Old aged for manual users.
is funny, on my Sony A7IV i have to set the exposure to +0.7 for them to be not underexposed
the overexposure is caused by the face/eye AF. It tends to expose the face of the subject when it detects one. Face/eye AF prioritizes exposure on the face and just ignore everything else. Turn it off and the results are different. Sony's maybe thinking that everyone shoots in raw and process the image later. 😂
It doesn't say much for Sony's software abilities does it?. Which is no surprise. Same old Sony. Overpriced devices with abysmal software support.
Interesting, on OP12 -0,7 is also the sweetspot
Why are you in all the photos. People take photos not only of people. Just a landscape photos or macro photos comparison would be better.
i have been an xperia user for last 6 years. One thing i can tell you guys. With the iphones and samsungs and other phones, the phone decides how the pictures will be and you pretty much cannot do anything to make it the way you want it to look. Whereas In the sony YOU choose how you want it to look. Sony is for the person who knows what exactly their pictures should look like. All the other phones are for people who don't mind the phone controlling their pictures' looks as long as the user looks good in the pictures. It is like choosing to make a home cooked meal where each and every ingredient is chosen by you, vs eating at a restaurant. There is no way someone doesn't like how restaurant food tastes. But sure one can mess up a home cooked meal.
That's a myth sony also processes the photos
@@ÑôusyyļIeù It's not a myth. I'm a professional photographer using a Nikon system as my main system and the xperia when I don't have the Nikon with me. If you're talking about some level of processing, then it is very debatable. Because then even if you're shouting film, the chemicals in the film and the processing method will determine how the prints will turn out. So no matter what camera you use. Each and every camera "processes" the look and can never exactly reproduce the real scene.
Enough yapping bro i also have xperia 1 mark 3 my friend have 1 mark 5 and my friend is a photographer he recommend me sony phone we bought our phones same day and we both were disappointed by the camera even a photographer Who uses sony phone says camera is bad
in the stock app maybe, but you can shoot more natural photos on other devices too. Also Sony doesn't give their better sensors for UW and zoom. It's a pity as they do many things right
Still sony for me upgraded camera,sd card, headphone jack and better battery life..🥰
Better battery life? How
But you can't buy
Not just that it’s much better build quality than other Android. I have a iPhone 14 Pro and recently picked a S24 and replacing the S24 with Sony as well.
Sony bettery life very bad...
Those are nice perks
It should be much much cheaper though being that the cameras just aren't that great
I have used both brands for the last 20+ years and Sony is more aesthetic in design both hardware and user interface. My current Xperia 1 iii phone never needed any visits to the service center since I bought it 3 years ago. It is more reliable than Samsung. Recently purchased Xperia 1 VI online and can hardly wait to use it.
9:55
Sony's Telephoto-macro: "Am I a joke to you!"
Clear win for xperia there
What the, you guys missed the 2X macro tele the Xperia 1 VI able to reach that Samsung and iPhone can't and the Xperia optically reach 7.2 and you guys compare it base on Samsung's reach and not each other advantage sides!
it's a real world camera use comparison, most people in the real world aren't gna use only upto 7.2x if they can go further, and telemacro is basically useless
@@TheOneDanTek Telemacro has a 100% guarantee that it will be less distorted, and it isn't an image crop like from the Ultra wide, neither does your phone ruin your light soruce while shooting Telemacro.
@@TheOneDanTek in that logic, you will zoom into 100x, you buy the phone, you know it's limitation, you don't use it for what it don't have and what other phone have, this phone reached optically only to 7.1x so you use it that way and only further digitally when you have to, your logic is so flaw, what if the older phone that don't have zoom at all, you are so wrong
@@fa14bi-78 noone really uses macro, i personally have to take a pic of a bug, and that was once, but most normal people aint gna use macro for nothing
@@NetvoTV you typed that in one of the most confusing ways possible, but this is what i understood it as. your saying that because the s24u can zoom upto 100x, i will regularly use 100x, which i, personally, will, but most people wont. they may go further than 5x but no more than maybe 20x. if you bought the sony you might go more than 7.2x but no more 15x. in short im saying that just because the best quality is 5 or 7.2x, doesnt mean people are only going to go up to those numbers if they buy that phone
you Didn't mention that Xperia 1vi can recording slow motion 4k 120fps in all lenses But Samsung s24 ultra only with 1 lense However, a point is awarded to Samsung Because recording full hd 240 fps ?
Reasons like these make people think that Xperia phones is Weak
In fact Xperia phones Oppressed
And without forgetting that the Xperia can shoot slow mo in all three lenses.
Always Xperia phone is my choice as when its in my hand no any phone can stand on my way due to lots of manual control. Good job miss.
Since I want something other than a Samsung that still supports a memory card and a headphone jack, the Xperia 1 VI is the best option out there right now.
How were you able to take a 30x pictures with the Sony when it doesn't go past 21.3x ?
You didn't give any more credit to the macro shots on the Xperia as it is one of its main new features.
Samsung and Sony are Partners, Samsung is the Overal better Camera and it beats the iphone 15 Pro Max, Samsung uses Sony Camera Sensors and Lenses😎
@@ricianobommel4298 just because Samsung uses Sony sensors don't make partners.
They are competitors only Samsung is focusing on the average consumers while Sony is focusing on a niche market.
They have a headphone jack, sd slot and an uninterrupted screen.
To get great shots you'll have to manually adjust.
But imo they've made a mistake with the 1vi.
As that niche wants a 4k 21:9 screen
@@ricianobommel4298all smartphone companies are competitors
@@ricianobommel4298still both are competitors
@@ricianobommel4298lmfao , actually not ,,, Sony is for photography, you need some time and the photo would be better than Samsung. Sony has basically better picture quality than samsung.
Sony has much better colour processing than samsung also more manual tweaking features , she didn't even mention the best features of sony .
Definitely a baised video .
2:42, the distortion of her shoes on samsung is crazy. LOL
yeah. I saw that. Her shoe is like 1/2 length from knee to the end of feet. :D
are these raw photos or jpeg on the sony?
Xperia can shoot 4k 120 on all lenses compared to only 1 in the galaxy???
The Galaxy can use AI to turn ANY video in slow-mo tho
@@YgorCortesGalaxy always step ahead❤
Cool but no one cares.
Thank you for your time and effort to make this video and share your knowledge with us. Greetings from Croatia.
I'm surprised how people are made to believe that these phones are better than Sony.
If you guys think photos are not colourful on Sony there's a Vivid option in the Creative Looks part. It's not over saturated but is a bit more closer to real life colours.
On the other hand, the default mode for this is Standard which is basically Sony Alpha camera settings for editing later. There's a Natural mode too although unsure it's real life colours or some kind of natural rendition of colours. Either way that's a tip or two I guess 🤷🏻♂️
Why does Samsung get a point for looking more natural, isn't that personal preference? Also you barely talked about the Macro mode, there's a big difference between the both of them, one is with the Ultrawide and the other with the Telephoto. Happy that this video exists but it feels like a lot is missing.
Samsung paid her probably.
Because no one cares about macro mode ? This the most useless feature on a phone.
@@alexgreg152 you’ve never used macro before then
@@synak1538 Lmao just take a picture in 200 mpx (on the Samsung) and crop in it 🤷🏻♂️. No need for any macro mode. And yes i used it on some phones and at first it was amazing but then after 2 days i never used it again 🤣. In my opinion telephoto lens is way more useful than putting your phone up against some food or whatever. Completely useless like i said.
@@alexgreg152 then you don’t understand my original comment. Sonys Macro Mode uses the Telephoto Sensor whereas Samsung uses the Ultrawide, which is why I said there is a big difference.
i think a software update can fix the white balance and exposure compensation metrics......this time sony had touted a better improved telephoto lens from 85 to 170 mm but i think it needs more improvement and sharpening....the audio also got a boost but slightly pales in comparison with the galaxy......nice work.....👍
let's talk about editing. which one gives me more control when i try to edit the pictures? ans- Sony.
the overexposure is caused by the face/eye AF. It tends to expose the face of the subject when it detects one. Face/eye AF prioritizes exposure on the face and just ignore everything else. Turn it off and the results are different. Sony's maybe thinking that everyone shoots in raw and process the image later. 😂
Nice review
I think this channel is biased towards Samsung and for some reason they are tarnishing Sony phones because I have seen with my own eyes that Sony's colors are more realistic and natural than Samsung's. How is it the opposite in this video? Unfortunately this channel has no credibility in comparison, especially since Sony is a party to it.
Xperia over Galaxy always!
Lmao keep wishing 😂.
Nice content 👌 👏 keep them coming
Weird they didn't say anything about Xperia 1 VI's Telezoom Macro. It blows all the competition out of the water.
Still, as others also say - the Sony is better for the people leaning towards photography.- I sold my S24 Ultra to get the Xperia 1 VI, and I haven't regret it. I love the Samsung, but as a wannabe photographer, there is just more that I appreciate with the Sony. First, and most easily, the dedicated proper shutterbutten. You half-press it to focus, and then complete-press it to shoot. I love that. And of course it's auto-focus capabilities is beyond compare.
What?? Samsung colors are more realistic and natural than Sony?? According to tests, Sony has the best colors and realistic images. How did the opposite happen in your comparison!! And as for the portrait, how did this happen with you? I tried the device and I did not have these problems!! I think this channel is not credible
I use Sony Xperia 5 Mark iii ❤
the sony has better results you just have to know the usefulness!
The over exposure on the Sony is not really acceptable considering it's price; but can the exposure be manually changed even when in auto mode?. I can do this on my S23 Ultra, and this ability is invaluable to me when shooting video outdoors especially.
HDR is off in portrait and in videos by default
Hi there! What I would like to see on your comparisons is more zoom shots, not just only one, because this way it is hard to tell which one is actually better.
Did not mention and compare 30 fps, eye tracking, animal eye tracking AI, ergonomics movement AI tracking capability Telemacro capability. Sunlight vision test both displays under sun.
SONY is winner .. Samsung photos are over processed photos ..
This time sony ended up having over processed photos from time to time, which really surprised me
yet the S24 Ultra still manages to look better most of the time especially in terms of controlling exposure and shadows.
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>iphones history😎,Samsung😎
sam is the king of phone camera ❤
It wins this test, but a quality Chinese device will wipe the floor with it photography-wise.
Sony is for who love photography not dynamic range 😅
Sony❤
Sony is the best
I am still gonna go with the Sony because it is more natural and more professional.
Blowing out highlights is natural?
@@carver9312 even my s20 fe 5g is better and there is Hdr 10 video mode makes details less sharpend and lights more realstic also i have motion camera pro app its capture Raw video in selfi and back cameras in raw details are comparable with dslr
@carver9312 I mean the pro mode section is way better on the sony
Professional photography isn't in the AI photography, it is all about pro mode
@@carver9312I guess someone who doesn't know how professional photography works. Go try a professional camera and let us see if you can perfectly expose all scenery.
I still chose Sony.
There is something wrong with this comparison.. I have seen comparisons between Sony and Samsung on other channels and Sony was better, specifically in the nature of colors. How is it in your comparison that it was the opposite?? I think you do not have credibility in the comparison and it is clear that you are biased towards Samsung.. I use the Xperia 1 Mark 4 and from my experience the colors of the Sony camera are much better than Samsung. The only thing that Samsung excels in over Sony is the zoom and portrait
King of camera Sony 🗿
It's funny currently there is no smartphone that can shoot amazing micro mode than Xperia 1 VI but you give a tie 😅
Not fair!! In fact all sony pictures and videos much better than samasung
Sony is for Mannual photography
Leave people alone, please 😅😅😅
Sony fanboys have been carrying the same excuse for ages, manual manual manual.
Even for that, hardware is shxt
Sony must start working more on software, it cannot compete only with hardware, since mobile phones are too small to be able to properly exploit the capabilities of the hardware
@@SHOWTEK..At last. Somebody who gets Sony's blatant weakness.
You should know well how to take photos from Sony mobile. You don't know how to take photos from Sony mobile.😂😂😂😂😂
we all know Sony's Automode is good but not excellent. But just try the Pro Mode and you'll get amazing shots 🗿😮💨
Sony cemera king ❤😊
Do u ever used a professional camera?
Sony is not for u. It’s only for pro users and photographers who can take photos like a pro.
It’s not for clicking in auto mode 😅
feels like she just likes Samsung
Scene optimizer on or off?
Off
@@versus_com I have to work as a closed scene optimizer all the time?
@@versus_com for any shots of people?
Nice comparison ❤
Most of the cases S24ULTRA totally nailed it 🔥
Would also say on video the Sony looks more stabilized over the Samsung... later on in your video I would say its the same, its only marginal, On the camera, there is different settings or modes to cope for different colours which you don't show here... Samsungs Ai is very odd... and also starts inventing, photos of the moon it uses that to layer other moon images on it...
For me its Sony.. as theres more things you didn't mention... SD card... headphone jack... 2 day battery life...
This comparison is clearly designed to favor Samsung. It's no exaggeration to call it stealth marketing by Samsung.
Shut up
Sony smartphones are not for every user. its function as a smartphone with a pro camera where you can make all the adjustments almost like a professional camera, no other smartphone can have this function. Sony manages to do this masterfully. Its cameras are not configured in standard AI mode like iPhone Samsung and Xiaomi and other models.
Sony is incredible if it's about manual camera settings which beats all phones. It's for someone who knows how to use manual set while Samsung is for those who use auto all the time
I prefer Sony 🔥
Not understand. You are say about better job at shadows in Samsung, but this is not real. Other - you are say about Samsung better job portrait, but your skin tone in real life like sony make)
Sony is for professionals... Period
That's why Sony cannot keep up, always left behind compared to Apple, Samsung, Pixel, and even with Some Chinese brands. People need reliable auto mode to take a quick picture. Imagine adjusting the manual settings everytime you want to take a picture, how many best moments you will miss.
Who are these professionals taking photos with a phone
it's still better when a phone's photo looks good in auto mode unlike others where you have to adjust it...
It's a decent phone but Sony could really stop making phones and nobody would care
Rubbish. Professionals use pro cameras, and steer clear of any device from Sony as a mobile back up device due to their ridiculous price and awful software support and quality. Most skilled photographers choose Chinese flagships as back up devices, as they are cheaper and possess vastly superior hardware.
You must be color-blind to give Crapsung any point for a true to life photography! Sony never listened to its die hard fans to improve their JPEG's processing and its HDR, but still it's better! This test is much too subjective and useless overall...
Sony looks better to me lol 😂😂😂😂, I guess it is personal preference in the end
Sony is slick !
it's clear that Sony devices are more suitable for photographers
No. Photographers use quality cameras, not an overpriced mobile device from a company with very poor software quality.
Comparation only auto menu on sony, sony have many feature to optimalize photo results....
Samsung galaxy s23 ultra Best 👌🏽👌🏽
But when the professional photographers review the xperia their portrait mode is so good!!!
That's because they always drop the exposure and warm it up, and watch the background light. In the right situation it can rock but needs nursing.
You mean (officially) paid professional photographers
Reviews from professional photographers always turned out to be sponsored by Sony. I can't find even one unbiased review from a professional photographer.
@@robinyumnam2646Spot on. Sony are well known for this dirty practise.
She literally showed you who won on the thumbnail😂
You cant do macro in PRO mode how come no "reviewer" found that? Also no 360 panoramas anymore and no one says that?
@ 3:50 you look like a villain on Samsung portrait mode. I think that's more concerning than some shirt details. Sony exposes portrait mode for face, that's why it's blowing out.
wtf, bro you definitely turned off stabilization on samsung🤦♂️🤦♂️6:08
Sony🤝Samsung
It's a Blind test🤡🤝.
Veganism should be supported by ceratane. Ozzie had a sharper vision.
Nice Comparison ❤❤
1 mark 6 natural colors, headphone jack and sd card slot 🖤🤍
Samsung colors are more realistic and natural than Sony?? How!! I tried both phones through my friends who own those phones and the result was that Sony's photos were more natural than Samsung's. How is it that in your comparison the opposite happens!! Mr. Channel Owner, did Samsung pay you to do this video or do you have a personal problem with Sony? 😂😂 Also when I tried the portrait, the problems that strangely appeared in this comparison did not appear to me.. This channel does not have credibility and neutrality in the comparison
Always sony xperia is the best
Unfair competition. 😂😂.. Ai camera from samsung vs Real Camera System from Sony. If you compare the camera make sure to compare every capabilities like the PRO mode. Also when it comes to zoom, sony only uses 7.5x at its best because we all know samsung uses ai to every lenses for zooming 😂 better not compare it.
Sony is better.
Sony 💪🏼
Vivo x200 cameras laugh to Sony camera manual 😂
Sony will always give U the exact U no filter thing..
That's the best I like about it. Straight out of the camera. No digital changes to footage
Ich habe nach 30 Sekunden ausgeschaltet 😅.... Sony macht deutlich bessere und natürlichere Fotos und Samsung genau das Gegenteil.
Sony 1VI is better than IPhone 15 pro max, and S24 ultra is better than both of them.
Why This Video feels like it's biased towards Samsung
Actually it's not feels because for sure and so clear this video towards Samsung
Samsung is looking wider in video since you guys have turned off the stabilization. Overall, it's a clear win for S24 Ultra.
Dame true
Samsung 🎉
Ever heard about Pro mode?
One thing I noticed about this channel is that they occasionally missed out on several important phone features from their deduction...and I have watched a few. But I get it, Samsung won at run and gun scenarios. If people wanted to justify fiddling manual settings like iso shutter speeds, strapping on an ND filter then why bother, just get an actual camera. Samsung won this round. Out of all Android manufacturer, Samsung IMHO have the best software optimisation/features second to iPhones.
To the viewers of this video. Its a couple that love Samsung galaxy and no matter how horrible the photos were done by samsung, it was given at least a tie if not samsung plus 1. Its not a reference video!
Samsung is a kid to Sony .. seriously.. u should do the job in pro mode
😂