Wilson Audio Sasha DAW HiFi Speakers Spectral Audio @ Munich High End Show 2019

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 жов 2024
  • Welcome to Pursuit Perfect System
    / pursuitperfectsystem
    www.pursuitperf...
    In this video I am in the Wilson Audio room where they are demonstrating their latest speakers the Sasha DAW.
    www.wilsonaudi...
    The system is using Spectral electronics
    Spectral dma280, dmc30ss, sda4000
    www.spectralaud...
    Thanks to my Show Sponsors
    Thanks to Melco
    www.melco-audi...
    Thanks to GIK Acoustics
    gikacoustics.c...
    Thanks to Tellurium Q
    telluriumq.com/
    The songs used in this video are
    The Moon Is a Harsh Mistress - Steve Dobrogosz, Radka Toneff
    geni.us/t00xWB
    Pacific Rim - Ramin Djawadi
    geni.us/UbILXpB
    There will be raft of videos to follow this one with a comprehensive video and audio coverage of the this amazing hifi show.
    I hope you enjoy it !!
    I am a Dirac Live Calibrator and come and out and setup systems for customers, if this is of interest please get in touch with me
    pursuitperfectsystem@outlook.com
    www.pursuitper...
    Please help support the channel with a very small monthly donation of £1 or $1 a month to help us make the channel better for you.
    / pursuitperfectsystem
    Also please remember to share one or any of our videos on another social media platform Facebook, Twitter etc to help make the channel bigger and then better for you going forward.
    Please remember to Support the Channel By Visiting our website and also to get more details of the system you are listening to
    www.pursuitperf...
    Please Dont forget to Visit the Channel for More Great HiFi and AV Content, Reviews, Demos and More
    / pursuitperfectsystem
    Video Equipment
    Camera
    amzn.to/2rCNv4L
    Microphones
    amzn.to/2G2X8fc
    amzn.to/2EiIUGJ
    Lenses
    geni.us/AyGC6
    amzn.to/2DLpJZH
    amzn.to/2FrWWFU
    Lights
    amzn.to/2DHJLDF
    amzn.to/2nUhiBv
    Stands
    amzn.to/2nZYaRU

КОМЕНТАРІ • 68

  • @piotrs.2389
    @piotrs.2389 2 роки тому +5

    Spectral Audio is one of my 3-4 favourite amplifiers brands in all audio industry. Simply stunning.

    • @ilcomendante
      @ilcomendante Рік тому

      Agreed. And which would be your others?

    • @piotrs.2389
      @piotrs.2389 2 місяці тому

      ​@@ilcomendante Definitely Nagra and Kondo (AN Japan).
      In the next few months I want to buy an amplifier and it will probably be Nagra Classic int (or pre/amp) or Kondo Overture.

  • @KT88gs
    @KT88gs 5 років тому +11

    Spectral and Wilson ,a combination that always works well,super realistic sound.

    • @markeverestov2275
      @markeverestov2275 2 роки тому

      Неплохо, но есть лучше. Например топовые VTL

  • @stateniland
    @stateniland 2 роки тому +3

    Have my W/A Sasha DAW's, Spectral Amp and Pre and MIT cables sounding wonderful..

  • @boogiel01
    @boogiel01 4 роки тому +4

    i have only just discovered these speakers just the speaker cable i was shown was £5000 WOW

  • @gsmd770
    @gsmd770 5 років тому +19

    Wilson Audio makes great speakers,but they're so far out of reach!!!

  • @kidkong637
    @kidkong637 Рік тому

    My dream system!

  • @MrBeblis
    @MrBeblis 3 роки тому +6

    Amazing how at all these shows you only hear this type of music and hifi recordings. Why don't they demo everyday popular music.

    • @videosuperhighway7655
      @videosuperhighway7655 3 роки тому +4

      Because the high end market is about listening to hardware not music.

    • @jerryjohnson3801
      @jerryjohnson3801 2 роки тому

      because most the ppl that buy at this price level are older ppl. Most younger ppl put their money into PC, Game, cars

    • @Music_time82
      @Music_time82 2 роки тому

      Go buy a bose knob

    • @kidkong637
      @kidkong637 Рік тому

      So they can hear themselves think
      So they can hear each other talk

  • @matthewtodd3879
    @matthewtodd3879 5 років тому +3

    For the seriously well healed

  • @spencerboaz2385
    @spencerboaz2385 4 роки тому +3

    I would like to hear Blue Stahli or Celldweller on this system .

  • @salvadorrodenas3071
    @salvadorrodenas3071 5 років тому +4

    Spectral audio is the only non Japanese brand that I would consider to own if not were for their out of my reach prices. right now there's a 260 stereo spectral power amp for sale ex-demo for a mere 17.000€😢, it did cost 26.000€ new. As I said, too much for me even lowering its price.

    • @bikemike1118
      @bikemike1118 3 роки тому +1

      Why is this the only non Japanese brand you would buy if you could afford?

  • @Beyondabsence
    @Beyondabsence 4 роки тому +3

    The harsh textures of the second track don't seem to justify listening to them on ultra expensive speakers. Big subwoofers and any good floorstanding speakers will do it.

  • @DDSRacer01
    @DDSRacer01 2 роки тому +1

    Who would dare get up in the middle of that song playing on those speakers 🤨

  • @ac81017
    @ac81017 2 роки тому

    Could be my next speaker.

  • @respondent5226
    @respondent5226 4 роки тому +1

    Wilson vs Magico please compare

  • @christopheri79
    @christopheri79 5 років тому

    Thank you :-)

  • @Beyondabsence
    @Beyondabsence 4 роки тому +2

    Radka Tonneff, voice and Steve Dobrogosz on piano. First track. Crackheads cannot appreciate this.

  • @ilcomendante
    @ilcomendante Рік тому

    Why is Spectral always demoed with Wilson. Do they have a clause or something? 🤔

  • @expresscruiserlife
    @expresscruiserlife 5 років тому +7

    My god, can't people stay still?

  • @MrFenceBuilder
    @MrFenceBuilder 3 роки тому

    let me win the lottery so i can put these on the back patio and blare Creed to the neighborhood

  • @kraken-s
    @kraken-s 5 років тому +2

    Spectral dma280, dmc30ss, sda4000

    • @PursuitPerfectSystem
      @PursuitPerfectSystem  5 років тому +3

      thank you, I couldn't find that info anywhere - appreciate it

    • @kraken-s
      @kraken-s 5 років тому +1

      Pursuit Perfect System i asked them about spectral stack details. The system was among the best in the show.

  • @bikemike1118
    @bikemike1118 3 роки тому

    Well in this video the sound of the system (first title) sounds very hollow to my ears.

  • @oldskool80sfan12
    @oldskool80sfan12 5 років тому +5

    The second track sounded much better. More music like this on high-end audio instead of those slappy boring tracks

  • @tombillard5264
    @tombillard5264 5 років тому

    Spectral amp?

    • @PursuitPerfectSystem
      @PursuitPerfectSystem  5 років тому +1

      yes the spectral components are now listed in the video description

  • @MrCatalysis101
    @MrCatalysis101 5 років тому

    My Quad 57s are much better on the first Radka Toneff track. They would blow up if presented with the second piece with that sort of power, lol.

    • @huskydogg7536
      @huskydogg7536 3 роки тому

      Lol, I was thinking the same with my 63s.

  • @bradt.3555
    @bradt.3555 4 роки тому

    Those look like a rip off of GNP Valkiries from the 70's!!! Which were designed by a cal-tek grad.

  • @ColocasiaCorm
    @ColocasiaCorm 4 роки тому +2

    Sounds kinda dull.

  • @jeromejax8675
    @jeromejax8675 5 років тому +1

    Why does the vendor always pick the most drab music to display their speakers? I must admit though the second song was alot better than the first.

    • @raadic5260
      @raadic5260 5 років тому +1

      Because the goal of HiFi is to sound real.

    • @jeromejax8675
      @jeromejax8675 5 років тому +1

      @@raadic5260 Well if that is the goal, then the first song sound real bad. So bad several people walked out of the room with the quickness.

    • @mayilefy
      @mayilefy 5 років тому +1

      Pacific Rim main theme,very easy to sound good

    • @PursuitPerfectSystem
      @PursuitPerfectSystem  5 років тому +5

      @@jeromejax8675 people always walk in and out of rooms - they go and see the many many many other rooms - that's not a reflection of anything they might have been there an hour or foolishly they judge too quickly

    • @PursuitPerfectSystem
      @PursuitPerfectSystem  5 років тому +1

      @@mayilefy I think the opposite - its not a naturally nice or easy listen track with a lot of densely layered elements that can easily mush together

  • @darbywing2
    @darbywing2 5 років тому +4

    Look at all the grey hair in that room (what's left of it). There is no one in that room that can hear above 15KHz or below 40 Hz anyway. Youth is wasted on the young, audiophile gear on the old.

    • @JG-gg9wk
      @JG-gg9wk 5 років тому

      Your showing your age, Thread easy, you'll be there sooner than you think. Besides, kids not only couldn't afford gear like this, they couldn't appreciated it.

    • @jpdj2715
      @jpdj2715 4 роки тому

      Frequency range, the way you use it shows a lot of ignorance. About human hearing. Most music is between two octaves below and three octaves above a piano's central A (440Hz). This gives a range of 110Hz to 3520Hz. Add an octave to either end and the range becomes 55Hz to 7040Hz. There are a couple things that can go below or above, but these are used very little. If this is the case, then why would we need more? Well, you need to answer two questions: 1) how come you can distinguish a flute from a clarinet from a cello when each of them plays a 440Hz note? And 2) how come you can place them somewhere in space, separately. The answer to #1 is that the ear and brain are not like a normal microphone. The inner ear has some 20,000 "microphones" that are tuned to a specific frequency and each of them feeds into a filter network. This enables us to filter out significant sounds from a noisy environment. It also enables us to recognize father or mother, horse or lion, flute or piano. Why are these all sounding different? Because each has another wave shape for the same 440Hz note. A transversal flute has a more or less perfect sine shape when a clarinet produces a block wave, whilst the cello produces a sine wave with two tiny spikes and a violin wave looks like chaos. The recognition follows learning as we grow older in that we store reference samples in our brain/memory and these are used to compare with later on. What does this have to do with frequency range? Well, if you need to reproduce a 1760Hz clarinet note, being a block wave, you need much higher bandwidth to do that precisely (study the theory of Fourier analysis here). Now the clarinet is accompanied by a piano, double bass, cello and maybe a singer and all of a sudden, using regular microphones and electronics, we need to add up those frequencies and wave shape complexities in order to make sure we do not change the clarinet into something that sounds like a transversal flute or saxophone (the latter has the clarinet mouthpiece and can come very close to a clarinet). Or, if the two tiny spikes on the cello's sine wave shift, we might not recognize its recording playback sound as a cello anymore. So, now imagine a large symphony orchestra. What bandwidth do you need for that? Yes, most electronic engineers are not aware of this and think in sine wave terms and by matching Ohm's Law and some components they can design and build nice kit. Does KOD mean something to you? With loudspeakers it becomes a nightmare as we need to turn the electrical signal into air vibrations. Bass notes need power and slower movements, when high frequencies need extreme agility. So typically, the electric signal is split into components for different drivers through a crossover filter. That filter is a nightmare as it has frequency dependent distortions (especially with capacitors in them). Then you drive different drivers but have to imagine from a clarinet bass note of, say, 110Hz the block wave now has been split in a roughly sine wave part going to your speaker's woofer and the other energy to midrange and tweeter in a 3-way speaker. This is easier in the digital domain, by the way, and with an active crossover to a multi-amp system where each driver in your speaker has its own amp (with their own damping). The nightmare is not over yet, as each driver's vibrations must arrive at your ear in a way that reproduces the original wave shape as closely as possible. To do this all a bit good is not expensive, but to do this perfect at all levels, today is still very expensive.
      So, the wave shape analysis in our brains as a way to recognize different sounds is limited to between 15Hz and 22kHz if we look at all of humans to find the extremes (because of the inner ear's properties and the amount of nanophones available). Men, generally bigger than women, can hear much less high and for all of us, when we grow older the young age limits shift to a narrower range. But the bandwidth needed to serve this frequency range well in music reproduction is higher. Then, if we accept that, the electronics safety margin is higher again. In short: to build a perfect 110Hz blockwave out of a loudspeaker, you need much more than that. Phase correct, or time aligned at all levels down to the listening ear. Change wave shape along the way and at some point sound becomes unrecognizable.
      Funnily, when we grow older, the pattern recognition becomes more difficult and understand-ability of sound is better when there are no phase (wave shape) faults. As to electronics and speakers, another problem is that it is very difficult to design and build electronics that does this all perfectly at very low volumes.
      The pattern (wave shape) recognition in the brain and its inherent comparison with stored samples is not very "latency" critical and - I believe - is done with nerves with normal synapses (neurotransmitter based). There are also electrical synapses in the brain and I imagine these are used (#2) to compare left to right in this process as we need low latency in this precision 'brain and survival' task.
      Finally, I believe some people may have more of a "hunter" brain that may have more sensitivity or inclination to find "sound stage" and clear audio more important than others. And whilst women have generally a wider hearing range than men, my observation is that they can easily identify differences between good and bad audio kit, but generally cannot be bothered less.

  • @williamfitzpatrick6369
    @williamfitzpatrick6369 5 років тому

    You're not playing music thinking the viewer is getting an impression of what it sounds like - are you?

    • @PursuitPerfectSystem
      @PursuitPerfectSystem  5 років тому +3

      try watching a few more show videos see how different they all are and then maybe you will get a better idea of the quality of the recordings I do, obviously using a good playback system like some quality headphones and a good dac/head amp

    • @shaunpaxton1577
      @shaunpaxton1577 4 роки тому +1

      Man shut up

  • @tigerone1218
    @tigerone1218 4 роки тому

    The piano did not sound good. What CD player was playing ?

  • @Jackie-hl7br
    @Jackie-hl7br 3 роки тому

    Im not surprised by the sound, its smoke like all exoteric hifi, not much better than a 6000€ speakers.

    • @PursuitPerfectSystem
      @PursuitPerfectSystem  3 роки тому

      Interesting comments if you attended the Munich High end show you would see thats really not the case some of the systems there give you a taste of the very high end but its only a taste as the show situation is massively limiting of the systems

  • @bobbywallington8745
    @bobbywallington8745 5 років тому

    All these rich guys watch jamesbond movies they want to hear bass beatz

    • @okancan9522
      @okancan9522 4 роки тому

      Beautiful song very relaxing sound wilson bravissimo

  • @steliosapergis
    @steliosapergis 4 роки тому

    100.000$ + for what reason?? Go by Klipsh with good cables and a good receivers and you see what amazing sound you hear!! And with the next 90.000$ + go holidays build a house or give the money in poor hungry family's!!