@@jeffreyagainstthelosers5702 if you have nothing better to say, then just shut up. I'm not defending them, but you're not making any sense and you seem to be the type to deny facts.
Had this even been two thirds of its full price it would have actually been a really good expansion pack. Instead they tacked another I on and charged it as a full game.
for those who write stupid things like it was stolen, let's remember that both iw and the bat said that they would transfer the stuff from mw2 to 3 for completeness, to give a continuity to the game, nothing was stolen apart from that, it's their stuff. what they want
Sure they can do that but I disagree with the price they charged for the sequel game, like you've to pay the full $70 for minimal changes & full story sequel? That isn't very reasonable
I hate how they didn't really.touch visual recoil unless you use specific attachments. Of course MW3 guns have to shine but it should be an even playing field so we can use whatever we want.
The mw2 guns have the gunsmoke go everywhere but the mw3 guns really only have gun smoke on the sides. While I love mw3, I’ll point out that the mw3 have a slight advantage in terms of visibility
@@calvinharter4805 I played for a bit and you’re kind of right but it feels like they actually made the MW2 guns worse than they were in MW2 to try and make people think this game is actually better.
@@jeffreyagainstthelosers5702Dude are you seriously going through everyone’s comments spouting the same nonsense, sure they re used weapons in MWIII but it’s not classified as “stealing” as they work for the same company you dumb @$$
@@jeffreyagainstthelosers5702 What're you talking about? Call of Duty has always reused assets between games from different studios. That ain't stealing.
Activision is not the problem, the people who buy their repetitive games are… Speak with your wallets people demand more out of your money in these difficult times…
I honestly couldn’t tell which game I was looking at some points in the video. I looked away for a few seconds and came back to the same gun and animations.
Here the weapons seem to sound the same but in game it feels like in MWII the weapons had way punchier and aggressive sound than the same weapons in MWIII.
@@trashcompactorYT actually the opposite, MWII is really washed out and opaque, MWIII at least looks like it has a Saturation boost, which is less bad.
Even better sledgehammer stole the weapons from mw2019 and mw2022 and put them in their game and stole the animations made by infinity ward what a great idea huh sledgehammer?
Vanguard was definitely worse, MWII is the bottom of the barrel, while Vanguard reached the bottom and then broke it beyond to go past the earth's crust.
couldn't get any worse than what they did with vanguard now this video sums a lot new atrocities sledgehammer has created They stole the weapons from mw2022 and strapped them in vanguard 2(mw2023) this is too much for sledgehammer's acts this year even they stole the animations we already know they don't have budget for their animation team what a shame sledgehammer studios
CoD projects have been sharing animations for twenty years. Also don't know if you knew this, but the MWII weapons in MWIII is part of this whole "Carry Forward" system where the guns you unlock in one game carry over to the next one. None of it was stolen, it was always planned like this. It kind of has to be when you have all three main studios working on the same game for a year and a half.
I blame Activision for forcing SHG to make MW3 in under 16 months
Poorly aged comment; MWIII ended up being 16x better than MWII 🤭
@Nazrat84 Nah, only the gameplay mechanics. Everything overall wasn't surpassing 2022😩🥶
@@SonaEmes-n4l "Nah, only the most important things were better." Amazing rebuttable.
@@Nazrat84but the only thing that sucked about MWIII was the campaign
Same weapons, same animation.
Different weapons, Different animation.
Nothing changed.
we all know sledgehammer is thief and thats much worse
The graphics changed, they are worse now.
@@jeffreyagainstthelosers5702for the love of fuck don't blame sledgehammer blame activision
@@jeffreyagainstthelosers5702why change what doesn’t need changing?
@@jeffreyagainstthelosers5702 Anything other than Infinity Ward, nope ..
modders call this a free shader pack and un nerfed movement. Activation calls it a 70 dollar triple a game.
in fairness it is activision
The movement is absolutely cracked. I don't even think any of the jetpack games had sprint speeds this fast.
Deadass happy to see the animations twice they hot
Lol good one cos it's true, pap pap
Call of Duty is so similar now that it's hard to tell which is MW II and which is MW III.
you can see that MW3 looks more hazy than MW2
you should 1) turn off motion blur in MWIII and the games are literally the same, 2) change the MWII name in the video title from MW2 to MWII
M16's 1 burst ttk seem to be slower in MWIII
Probably cause of increased health
I think the TTK is a bit stupid. Like it was in CW and BO4 but whatever. Still a better game than people give it credit for.
70$ DLC moment
How original.
and sledgehammer stole everything from infinity ward especially the animations the weapons from mw2019 and mw2022 so we must file a protest at them
@@jeffreyagainstthelosers5702 wrong use of the word "stole"
@@ShinzouWoSateSateSate I don't care they obviously did
@@jeffreyagainstthelosers5702 if you have nothing better to say, then just shut up. I'm not defending them, but you're not making any sense and you seem to be the type to deny facts.
Had this even been two thirds of its full price it would have actually been a really good expansion pack. Instead they tacked another I on and charged it as a full game.
that was just same issue at MWII before
the weapon animations has nothing changed in MWIII
remind me of Counter Strike 2...
Most Expensive Dlc ever
for those who write stupid things like it was stolen, let's remember that both iw and the bat said that they would transfer the stuff from mw2 to 3 for completeness, to give a continuity to the game, nothing was stolen apart from that, it's their stuff. what they want
MUST CONSUUUUUME
Sure they can do that but I disagree with the price they charged for the sequel game, like you've to pay the full $70 for minimal changes & full story sequel? That isn't very reasonable
It was just same, nothing changed.
well it's obviously sledgehammer stole these from mw2022 and put them in their game they're thieves after all bro we must not forget the fact
What did you expect?
@@jeffreyagainstthelosers5702 you're acting like they robbed a bank or something
@@niezniszczalnychinczyk8701 he just hates sledgehammer a lot
@@niezniszczalnychinczyk8701 sledgehammer do rob infinity ward
MW3 is just an Extension to MW2 with Bad Campaign
I hate how they didn't really.touch visual recoil unless you use specific attachments. Of course MW3 guns have to shine but it should be an even playing field so we can use whatever we want.
lmao the MW3 guns have exactly the same amount of visual recoil quit coping that they "shine"
The mw2 guns have the gunsmoke go everywhere but the mw3 guns really only have gun smoke on the sides.
While I love mw3, I’ll point out that the mw3 have a slight advantage in terms of visibility
@@calvinharter4805 I played for a bit and you’re kind of right but it feels like they actually made the MW2 guns worse than they were in MW2 to try and make people think this game is actually better.
@@trashcompactorYT no they don’t lmao
@@Optimusprime56241 yes they do lol they literally added the gas back to the guns that was removed at launch with MW2
IW and SHG: *They made us finish this game half assed. So Activision can pretend they really care about community.*
screw them and I hate who is stealing stuffs from another game and put them in their game I don't think it's allowed
@@jeffreyagainstthelosers5702Dude are you seriously going through everyone’s comments spouting the same nonsense, sure they re used weapons in MWIII but it’s not classified as “stealing” as they work for the same company you dumb @$$
@@jeffreyagainstthelosers5702 Well, they been doing that since first Call of Duty released.
@@jeffreyagainstthelosers5702 What're you talking about? Call of Duty has always reused assets between games from different studios. That ain't stealing.
@@mistertililing5933 hes just a sledgehammer hater, i been seeing him commenting negative things about sledgehammer everytime
Activision is not the problem, the people who buy their repetitive games are… Speak with your wallets people demand more out of your money in these difficult times…
I honestly couldn’t tell which game I was looking at some points in the video. I looked away for a few seconds and came back to the same gun and animations.
good job about Weapons Comparison from Call of Duty Modern Warfare II and Call of Duty Modern Warfare III 2023
SAME SHIT DIFFERENT DAY
Next: Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 OG vs Call of Duty Modern Warfare III Reboot Weapons Comparison
everything is completelly identical, correct?
Brain: Wait a minute. Wait a f..king minute. This is the same f..king game!!
2:20 I didn't know that they added the Ukrainian bullpup AK.
At least original MW3 changed models and sounds.
It’s literally the same thing, if you don’t précise which game are you in I wouldn’t know if it’s MWII or MWIII
Here the weapons seem to sound the same but in game it feels like in MWII the weapons had way punchier and aggressive sound than the same weapons in MWIII.
Nothing change its just a mw2 dlc
Just like MW3 borrowed the same exact weapons from MW2,so did MWIII with MWII.
They were all remodeled from MW2 to MW3 and they all performed relatively different
You're right. That's actually make the situation between MWII and MWIII even sadder lmao.
All most the same, but Mw3 looks brighter.
I see no difference
the difference is sledgehammer is a thief and infinity ward is a victim of sledgehammer's vicious acts
@@jeffreyagainstthelosers5702a year late and dude sledgehammer games ain’t that bad your acting like they robbed your home
do they shake the same? cos guns in mw3 seems like laser beamers, so how competitive are mw2 guns against mw3 guns?
What’s the difference? They’re both the same game
"we want buyable dlc"
They give us.
"WOAH this is just a DLC?!?😡😡😡😤"
I don't know about you but it seems to me that there is better graphic cleaning in mw2
he left motion blur on in mwiii
There is motion blur on MW3 thats why
Its also about which map.
In MW2 its afternnon but in MW3 it like before afternoon
The guns not only look crap but also are named incorrectly
Really wish this person added something that let us know which game it is cause I have no idea which one is mw2 and which one is mw3
The one that doesn't look blurry and washed out is the Infinity Ward game :)
@@trashcompactorYT actually the opposite, MWII is really washed out and opaque, MWIII at least looks like it has a Saturation boost, which is less bad.
@@M0D776 bro watch the fucking video lmao
Graphics on mw3 looks slightly Vanguardish
cuz it's made by the same company
@@Yetha148 exactly
70 dollars for unfinished game (or DLC btw) within half-baked and soulless absolutely
Even better sledgehammer stole the weapons from mw2019 and mw2022 and put them in their game and stole the animations made by infinity ward what a great idea huh sledgehammer?
@@jeffreyagainstthelosers5702god you’re dumb
☠️☠️☠️ nah
@@jeffreyagainstthelosers5702You’re a big dummy
MWIII lowkey looking like Blender
And I thought Vanguard was the bottom of the shit barrel. Copy/paste development. What a shame for what could've been a great sequel.
yes and the game has all stuffs from mw2019 and mw2022 and it was stolen
@@jeffreyagainstthelosers5702its not stolen like there isn't any copyrights in CoD😂
Vanguard was definitely worse, MWII is the bottom of the barrel, while Vanguard reached the bottom and then broke it beyond to go past the earth's crust.
couldn't get any worse than what they did with vanguard now this video sums a lot new atrocities sledgehammer has created
They stole the weapons from mw2022 and strapped them in vanguard 2(mw2023) this is too much for sledgehammer's acts this year even they stole the animations we already know they don't have budget for their animation team what a shame sledgehammer studios
CoD projects have been sharing animations for twenty years.
Also don't know if you knew this, but the MWII weapons in MWIII is part of this whole "Carry Forward" system where the guns you unlock in one game carry over to the next one. None of it was stolen, it was always planned like this. It kind of has to be when you have all three main studios working on the same game for a year and a half.
@@LN_1995 I dont care about that I only care is sledgehammer who start stealing from another cod game
@@jeffreyagainstthelosers5702according to that logic WaW had animations from CoD 1.
Infinite Warfare was literally BO3😂
@@jeffreyagainstthelosers5702 Fun Fact: CoD has always done this, BO1 reuses animations from CoD4 for the AKs and pistols for example.
Bro Still the same 😓
Is just dlc
So, its the same way playing MW2 and MW3
You made a mistake! Its mw2 on both sides
Oh wait isn't it?
MWII : Not Bad Graphics
MWIII : Downgraded
Why MW3 looks blurry 💀
Motion blur is on
wise guy please sing it I dare you and mosin I'm always watching you
welcome back to hell, maggot. We got sledgehammer, sledgehammer, and sledgehammer.
Pick one and leave. And you're not welcome, by the way
MW3 looks a lot better
A bit worse in terms of lighting
This MWIII map is better for weapon showcase, I really don't like the MWII clip
Activision needs to be sued over this garbage
why mw3 looks like cold war?
People complaining about this being a DLC when it plays better than MW2 ever did and comes with 38 weapons and 15 maps lol
so for 70 bucks we get the same game (partly its even worse) with shit campaign, great
Ppl complain too much js dont buy the game 🤷🏽
Nothing different
These guns would be worth it if they removed the visual recoil.
i dont see a diffirence
mw3 looks like a roblox game in comparison
Yes it’s not!
Why even bother doing a comparison video lmfao
why does mw3 look more washed out and blurry than mw2
MW3💩💩💩👎👎👎
DLC