Section 61 to 64 of Indian Evidence Act|| Primary Evidence|| Secondary Evidence|| go legal

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 сер 2024
  • Section 61 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
    61. Proof of contents of documents.-The contents of documents may be proved either by primary or by secondary evidence.
    62. Primary evidence
    Primary evidence means the documents itself produced for the inspection of the Court.
    Explanation 1-Where a document is executed in several parts, each part is primary evidence of the document :
    Where a document is executed in counterpart, each counterpart being executed by one or some of the parties only, each counterpart is primary evidence as against the parties executing it.
    Explanation 2- Where a number of documents are all made by one uniform process, as in the case of printing, lithography, or photography, each is primary evidence of the contents of the rest ; but, where they are all copies of a common original, they are not primary evidence of the contents of the original.
    Illustrations
    A person is shown to have been in possession of a number of placards, all printed at one time from one original. Any one of the placards is primary evidence of the contents of any other, but no one of them is primary evidence of the contents of the original.
    63. Secondary evidence
    Secondary evidence means and includes-
    (1) certified copies given under the provisions hereinafter contained;
    (2) Copies made from the original by mechanical processes which in themselves ensure the accuracy of the copy, and copies compared with such copies.
    (3) copies made from or compared with the original ;
    (4) counterparts of documents as against the parties who did not execute them;
    (5) oral accounts of the contents of a documents given by some person who has himself seen it.
    Illustration
    (a) A photograph of an original is secondary evidence of its contents, though the two have not been compared, if it is proved that the thing photographed was the original.
    (b) A copy compared with a copy of a letter made by a copying machine is secondary evidence of the contents of the letter, if it is shown that the copy made by the copying machine was made from the original.
    (c) A copy transcribed from a copy, but afterwards compared with the original, is secondary evidence; but he copy not so compared is not secondary evidence of the original, although the copy from which it was transcribed was compared with the original.
    (d) Neither an oral account of a copy compared with the original, nor an oral account of a photograph or machine copy of the original, is secondary evidence of the original.
    64. Proof of documents by primary evidence
    Documents must be proved by primary evidence except in the cases hereinafter mentioned.
    Follow us on Instagram ...@Go.legal
    section 136 of Indian Evidence Act ... • Section 136 of Indian ...
    section 26 of SRA. • Rectification of Instr...
    Section 34 of SRA... • Section 34 SRA || TUTO...
    Section 20 of SRA... • Section 20 Specific Re...
    Section 31-33 of SRA... • section 31 - 33 of Spe...
    Section 138- 142 of Negotiable Instrument Act.. • Section 138 - 142 of N...
    Double Jeopardy • Double Jeopardy || Aut...
    Criminal law amendment 2018 .. • The Criminal Law (Amen...
    Section 165 of Evidence Act.. • Section 165 of Indian ...
    Criminal Judgment writing ... • JUDGMENT WRITING || Tu...
    Section 313 of Cr.P.C..... • Section 313 of Crimina...
    Chhattisgarh Judicial Services Examination (pre) 2004 .... • Chhattisgarh Judicial ...
    Chhattisgarh Judicial services Examination (pre) 2003.... • Chhattisgarh Judicial ...
    Chhattisgarh judicial services examination 2008... • Chhattisgarh Judicial ...
    Chhattisgarh Civil Judge (pre) examination 2014... • Chhattisgarh Judicial ...
    Chhattisgarh Civil Judge (pre) examination 2016... • Chhattisgarh Civil Jud...
    Preventive Relief Under Specific Relief Act ... • Preventive Relief || T...
    thank you...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 56

  • @rakeshkanrar8219
    @rakeshkanrar8219 Рік тому +2

    One of the most underrated law channel

  • @ashwiniashu359
    @ashwiniashu359 Рік тому

    Really excellent explanation.
    Easy to understanding your lecture and meaning...
    Thank you...

  • @foutgsg_67
    @foutgsg_67 4 роки тому +2

    Wow... great explanation...👌👌👌👌👌

  • @ruralenglishacademy1591
    @ruralenglishacademy1591 3 роки тому +1

    Today you cleared my concept.... a huge complicated between primary and secindry

  • @tanmayamishra683
    @tanmayamishra683 2 роки тому

    Excellent

  • @arjun6813
    @arjun6813 Рік тому

    Best explain

  • @waseemsyed6347
    @waseemsyed6347 2 роки тому

    Mam plz upload videos on complete Evidence Act..Your Method of explaination is very easy to understand . It is very useful and helpful .

  • @mahadevlohar6925
    @mahadevlohar6925 2 роки тому

    Nice explanation, mam.

  • @warriorstale532
    @warriorstale532 4 роки тому +1

    Best 👍💯

  • @anwarshah8959
    @anwarshah8959 4 роки тому +1

    Great, nice well explained

  • @subhashkamble127
    @subhashkamble127 3 роки тому +1

    Smart information, thanks

  • @soniyaverma618
    @soniyaverma618 3 роки тому

    Good ma'am, thanks a lot. Concept aaj clear hua ma'am.

  • @saeedanwarshah4116
    @saeedanwarshah4116 2 роки тому

    Really great. Explained very well

  • @Ankit8052
    @Ankit8052 4 роки тому +1

    Nice explanation ma'am

  • @subratsharma6505
    @subratsharma6505 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for information

  • @mdnadim4979
    @mdnadim4979 3 роки тому +1

    Excellent!

  • @prakashpv7825
    @prakashpv7825 3 роки тому

    Very good explain

  • @wyadav007
    @wyadav007 2 роки тому

    really appreciable lecture

  • @mirzapurkiaawaazmedianews4898
    @mirzapurkiaawaazmedianews4898 2 роки тому

    Excellent explanation 👍

  • @nasirmiss143
    @nasirmiss143 4 роки тому +1

    Good

  • @vijayanandtyagi5894
    @vijayanandtyagi5894 4 роки тому +1

    Explained nicely

  • @rakeshjain6845
    @rakeshjain6845 2 роки тому

    Nicely explained

  • @pratibhavashishtha829
    @pratibhavashishtha829 4 роки тому +2

    Thanks for uploading lecture. Kindly upload lecture on exclusion of oral evidence. Plz

    • @GOLEGAL
      @GOLEGAL  4 роки тому +1

      ua-cam.com/video/OelupzB-JGQ/v-deo.html

    • @GOLEGAL
      @GOLEGAL  4 роки тому +1

      ua-cam.com/video/-IE-4mbSGo0/v-deo.html please go through these videos you will get your answer

  • @Sana_1995
    @Sana_1995 2 роки тому

    Thanks🙏🙏

  • @advsiddikh8176
    @advsiddikh8176 3 роки тому

    Good👍🌹

  • @renunahar7129
    @renunahar7129 2 роки тому

    👌👍

  • @vihaanjoon7007
    @vihaanjoon7007 3 роки тому

    Nice explain

  • @santoshsinghsingh3645
    @santoshsinghsingh3645 Рік тому

    Thanks maam

  • @suryad427
    @suryad427 Рік тому

    Printout of a photo taken with digital camera is -
    1) primary evidence
    2) secondary evidence
    Maam can you please answer this.........And why?

  • @bobbypatil7718
    @bobbypatil7718 Рік тому

    thanks

  • @amittripathi6748
    @amittripathi6748 3 роки тому

    Nice.,

  • @shreegiribasavaraj7411
    @shreegiribasavaraj7411 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you

  • @stayfit6576
    @stayfit6576 2 роки тому

  • @sumitkumar-cq7ul
    @sumitkumar-cq7ul Рік тому

    Thanks mam

  • @advyogeshrathore8533
    @advyogeshrathore8533 4 роки тому +1

    👌👌👌👌

  • @rupalbharvad1382
    @rupalbharvad1382 3 роки тому

    Super mam

  • @RakeshMishra-gd5tp
    @RakeshMishra-gd5tp 4 роки тому +1

    Thank u

  • @karanyadav8012
    @karanyadav8012 2 роки тому

    Thanks ma'am kya koi bhi electronic evidence like cctv, video, audio mei koi edit hai like date and time toh wo pata chal sakega ki nahi

  • @amitkrai7640
    @amitkrai7640 4 роки тому +1

    There is lots of cuts in video,however exp is good

  • @vinodkumarsangwan3961
    @vinodkumarsangwan3961 3 роки тому

    Thank u🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @mohammadtariq7575
    @mohammadtariq7575 2 роки тому

    Dear ?Ma'm. it's said Substantial evidence can be direct evidence or Circumstantial evidence, or both. Sir kindly guide me with examples that how it is possible.

  • @karanyadav8012
    @karanyadav8012 2 роки тому

    Ma'am we are required to submit cctv dvr in court Or just copy of incident time only

  • @saileshpandey9263
    @saileshpandey9263 3 роки тому +1

    Court ka judgement jo court se ticket lagake milta hai kaun sa evidence hai primary or secondary

    • @GOLEGAL
      @GOLEGAL  3 роки тому

      Aisi copy of judgment ko hum certified copy kehte hai or ye primary evidence hai

    • @advkanchanbagaria505
      @advkanchanbagaria505 3 роки тому +1

      Ma'am certified copy to 63(1)ke tahat secondary evidence h

    • @sapnasandhu759
      @sapnasandhu759 3 роки тому

      @@GOLEGAL KINDLY REFER 63 or 76 section. it is secondary evidence

  • @Ankit8052
    @Ankit8052 4 роки тому

    Ma'am indian evidence act affidavits pr applicable kyu nhi hai ?

  • @sushenmahajan8642
    @sushenmahajan8642 4 роки тому +1

    Hi. My name is Sushen Mahajan. I need to know whether you can provide video lectures on indian evidence act and cpc. I was willing to have videos on all the sections of these 2 acts. If possible just let know the fees and the other important aspects related to it.

    • @GOLEGAL
      @GOLEGAL  4 роки тому +1

      Yes, I will
      You please send message on our Instagram @go.legal

    • @sushenmahajan8642
      @sushenmahajan8642 4 роки тому

      GO LEGAL thankyou. i just left a message on your instagram. Please kindly contact and let me know in detail

  • @amberaquil4768
    @amberaquil4768 2 роки тому

    Mam plz sec 60 ki video upload kr de

  • @mohdshahbaz7986
    @mohdshahbaz7986 3 роки тому +1

    💯/💯

  • @RavinderKumar-bs7oe
    @RavinderKumar-bs7oe 2 роки тому

    Takra examination hai g

  • @KrishnaDas-tz7zg
    @KrishnaDas-tz7zg 3 роки тому