Section 32 of Indian Evidence Act|| Tutorial || Go legal

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 жов 2024
  • Section 32
    Statements, written or verbal, of relevant facts made by a person who is dead, or who cannot be found, or who has become incapable of giving evidence, or whose attendance cannot be procured, without an amount of delay or expense which under the circumstances of the case appears to the Court unreasonable, are themselves relevant facts in the following cases-
    when it relates to cause of death: When the statement is made by a person as to the cause of his death, or as to any of the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in his death, in cases in which the cause of that person’s death comes into question.
    (1)Such statements are relevant whether the person who made them was or was not, at the time when they were made, under expectation of death, and whatever may be the nature of the proceeding in which the cause of his death comes into question.
    (2)or is made in course of business: When the statement was made by such person in the ordinary course of business, and in particular when it consists of any entry or memorandum made by him in books kept in the ordinary course of business, or in the discharge of professional duly; or of an acknowledgment written or signed by him of the receipt of money, goods, securities or property of any kind; or of a document used in commerce written or signed by him; or of the date of a letter or other document usually dated, written or signed by him.
    (3)or against interest of maker: When the statement is against the pecuniary or proprietary interest of the person making it or when, if true, it would expose him or would have exposed him to a criminal prosecution or to a suit for damages.
    (4)or gives opinion as to public right or custom, or matters of general interests: When the statement gives the opinion of any such person, as to the existence of any public right or custom or matter of public or general interest, of the existence of which, if it existed he would have been likely to be aware, and when such statement was made before any controversy as to such right, custom or matter had arisen.
    (5)or relates to existence of relationship: When the statement relates to the existence of any relationship by blood, marriage or adoption between persons as to whose relationship by blood, marriage or adoption the person making the statement had special means of knowledge, and when the statement was made before the question in dispute was raised.
    (6)or is made in will or deed relating to family affairs: When the statement relates to the existence of any relationship by blood, marriage or adoption between persons deceased, and is made in any will or deed relating to the affairs of the family to which any such deceased person belonged, or in any family pedigree, or upon any tombstone, family portrait, or other thing on which such statements are usually made, and when such statement was made before the question in dispute was raised.
    (7)or is document relating to transaction mentioned in section 13, clause (a): When the statement is contained in any deed, will or other document which relates to any such transaction as is mentioned in section 13, clause (a).
    (8)or is made by several persons and expresses feelings relevant to matter in question: When the statement was made by a number of persons, and expressed feelings or impressions on their pan relevant to the matter in question.
    Do follow us on Instagram @go.legal
    Join us for Online Live Classes
    Contact 8383843679

КОМЕНТАРІ • 79

  • @siddharthsinha8493
    @siddharthsinha8493 3 роки тому +31

    This is the first video of i have seen that can give tough fight to finology legal and theory of abrogation....keep it up...!! Crystal clear concept..!!

    • @GOLEGAL
      @GOLEGAL  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you so much for appreciation...

    • @navneet3515
      @navneet3515 3 роки тому +6

      Finology legal is flawed. So much editing almost after every two sentences. And the topic they choose is childish and only for 1st year law student or non law students preparing for competitive exams.

    • @seemamujawar36
      @seemamujawar36 2 роки тому +1

      I just don't like finology , cut paste, Childish subject dealing...
      Good for Non- law student...

  • @avinash3505
    @avinash3505 4 роки тому +5

    Your mode of explaining things acclaimed as a masterpiece

  • @pawanlalgupta6473
    @pawanlalgupta6473 3 роки тому +3

    Geetanjli ji you are doing a fantastic job.... Impeccable job...

  • @seemamujawar36
    @seemamujawar36 2 роки тому +1

    Super madam... I watched ur all vedio, SPL on limitation act super..
    All topics u nailed mam..🙏🙏 thank you so much

  • @santoshwankhede3938
    @santoshwankhede3938 Рік тому

    Excellent teaching

  • @aamirns2
    @aamirns2 4 роки тому +3

    Regards from Pakistan. You are explaining it so well and making it easier for me to understand law of evidence

  • @A_aaaaaa-w8l
    @A_aaaaaa-w8l 10 місяців тому

    Thankuu so much for the lecyire very well explained🎉

  • @sandipsakpal992
    @sandipsakpal992 Рік тому

    Good information

  • @shreyapatel9556
    @shreyapatel9556 3 роки тому +2

    one of the best-explianed videos...... keep it up... the concept was very clear and easy to understand....!!!!

  • @adv.rizwanlegalacadamyshar8366

    Nice explanation 32(5)).it is applicable in so many civil matters.

  • @foutgsg_67
    @foutgsg_67 4 роки тому +1

    Wow...best explanation on the online source...👌👌👌 i haven't words !! 🤗🔰🏆

  • @RajeshYadav-ry6jj
    @RajeshYadav-ry6jj 8 місяців тому +1

    Great explanation. One advice what ever you are explaining should also appear on screen in form of text

  • @neerusharma4363
    @neerusharma4363 3 роки тому +1

    Vedio is to the point nd informative ...mam you cover all that points in your vedios which is not covered in any other channel's vedios ..keep uploading such a stuff 👍❤️

  • @sapnasandhu759
    @sapnasandhu759 3 роки тому

    Exellent teaching.. Superb

  • @rishichawla6328
    @rishichawla6328 3 роки тому

    Very well explained.....
    Keep it up.....

  • @simranjeet9316
    @simranjeet9316 Рік тому

    💯💯💯 nice class mam

  • @shantiss93
    @shantiss93 2 роки тому

    Thank you for explaining this section its helping me lot but one request from my friends
    kindly add subtitle it will be more helpful

  • @justicefrequent
    @justicefrequent 3 роки тому +2

    You have missed atmost important maxim and landmark case laws relating to dying declaration. Please add them.

  • @mdshakir7956
    @mdshakir7956 3 роки тому

    Excellent lecture thank u so much mam tday my IEA exams maam

  • @neelakshisuneja6288
    @neelakshisuneja6288 4 роки тому +4

    Thank you 😊 for explaining this section so clearly ...continue the good work...really helpful..keep it up!..👍

  • @dipankargarg97
    @dipankargarg97 4 роки тому +1

    Very informative

  • @ishtiyaqmir30
    @ishtiyaqmir30 4 роки тому +3

    You have some skills ... keep uploading more videos

  • @riyasuri7230
    @riyasuri7230 4 роки тому +1

    This was very good and helpful

  • @gfgckampli4405
    @gfgckampli4405 2 роки тому

    Your video was very helpful madem

  • @RakeshMishra-gd5tp
    @RakeshMishra-gd5tp 4 роки тому +1

    Very Nice lecture madam, thank u .madam can a daying declaration be acted upon without corroboration??plz madam explain this with case law .

  • @smrutisudhaacharya9290
    @smrutisudhaacharya9290 3 роки тому

    Nice vedio

  • @RAHULRL107
    @RAHULRL107 2 роки тому

    Thanks so much ma'am for this video
    It is so helpful 👍

  • @mithileshkumarsingh6061
    @mithileshkumarsingh6061 3 роки тому

    Good morning Mam
    I listened your speeches on 32 IEA
    I have a question: let us suppose a female went missing from more than 7 years. A statement given regarding demanding dowry and cruelty by her parents in court are admissible for convicting under 498a? This question is based on your explanation. Plz

  • @vihaanjoon7007
    @vihaanjoon7007 3 роки тому

    Nice

  • @erkhaliqulazam1984
    @erkhaliqulazam1984 4 роки тому +1

    Good

  • @patilpriya3524
    @patilpriya3524 Рік тому

    Explain circumstances in which statement of person who can not be called as witness becomes relevant ?????

  • @MANISHGUPTA-hj3md
    @MANISHGUPTA-hj3md 2 роки тому

    👍👍

  • @sarika2573
    @sarika2573 3 роки тому

    Gajab 😊

  • @tanweeransari3661
    @tanweeransari3661 4 роки тому +1

    Well explained ❤
    Thnk u

  • @mahendersingh-mz8uh
    @mahendersingh-mz8uh 4 роки тому +2

    Thanks

  • @soniapaul1891
    @soniapaul1891 Рік тому

    Dd can be record by anyone evidencary value of dd vary if dd record by magistrate evidencary value will be high if record by police then low if record by pvt person then minor corroboration need for it

  • @satyamanand9363
    @satyamanand9363 Рік тому

    Thanku so much

  • @eshasarda5097
    @eshasarda5097 3 роки тому

    Good explanation, thank you ma'am!

  • @anjalisoni3551
    @anjalisoni3551 Рік тому

    Thnq so much mam. 🙏

  • @karishmaparmar129
    @karishmaparmar129 3 роки тому +1

    👌👍👏👏👏👏

  • @sarojbhoi18
    @sarojbhoi18 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you mam

  • @vanitasaxena1086
    @vanitasaxena1086 Рік тому

    Mam ye guidelines kis case mein di gyi thi kindly reply mam 🙏

  • @ghanshyamnagar6967
    @ghanshyamnagar6967 3 роки тому

    Mam census record of Rajasthan state ko evidence ke roop me use kar sakte hai kya

  • @adv.kulwindersran5163
    @adv.kulwindersran5163 4 роки тому +1

    Vry good mamm.thaxxxxx..

  • @subhampriya6514
    @subhampriya6514 2 роки тому

    Nice video di

  • @RakeshMishra-gd5tp
    @RakeshMishra-gd5tp 4 роки тому +1

    Thank u

  • @thelawbird
    @thelawbird 3 роки тому +1

    Corroborative evidence kya hote h

  • @padumchandra9961
    @padumchandra9961 2 роки тому

    Thanks ☺️

  • @divyasharma-ol4tv
    @divyasharma-ol4tv 4 роки тому +2

    Upload more lectures

  • @_.saloni___
    @_.saloni___ Рік тому

    Thankyou ❤

  • @AshishKumar-ic4yv
    @AshishKumar-ic4yv 2 роки тому

    पीड़ित(Victim ) पुरुष भी तो हो सकता है जो आप बार-बार स्त्री का उदहारण दे रहे है |

  • @mukeshdevi7923
    @mukeshdevi7923 3 роки тому

    🙏🙏🙏

  • @chandanchowdhury9959
    @chandanchowdhury9959 4 роки тому +2

    Your lecture should be with written form other wise unable to follow you.

  • @patilpriya3524
    @patilpriya3524 Рік тому

    Yis question ka answer ye likh sakte hai kya

  • @raviprakashdwivedi8324
    @raviprakashdwivedi8324 4 роки тому

    Pranam

  • @YashpalSingh-pn4eg
    @YashpalSingh-pn4eg 2 роки тому

    आप सही बात करते हैं लेकिन हिन्दी में होता तो शायद ज्यादा लोग लाभ ले सकते थे।

  • @raviprakashdwivedi8324
    @raviprakashdwivedi8324 3 роки тому

    namaskrrr ...

  • @advnavasjana
    @advnavasjana 4 роки тому +1

    Specify pakala narayan vs emperer case

  • @bhuveneshwarsinghtanwar6263
    @bhuveneshwarsinghtanwar6263 3 роки тому

    Ma'am apne 3rd clause sahi se nhi kraya

  • @HomefinderAgt85
    @HomefinderAgt85 3 роки тому

    Clause 3 not clearly explained

  • @SurajKumar-or1iv
    @SurajKumar-or1iv 4 роки тому +3

    There is nothing mention in the bare act about who can record dying declaration...

    • @GOLEGAL
      @GOLEGAL  4 роки тому +2

      Yes, you are right...
      There are SC judgments on that

    • @kartiktyagi8739
      @kartiktyagi8739 4 роки тому +3

      Anyone can record dying declaration. nothing specific is given about it in this act, who can record it.

  • @kratikayadav4528
    @kratikayadav4528 Рік тому

    Baad wale clause ke examples nahi diye jiske liye video chalaya tha

  • @SapnaJagat-uo9gp
    @SapnaJagat-uo9gp 4 місяці тому

    Aap naak se q baat krti ho jiske wajah se apka voice clearly sunai nahi deta

  • @aiktanarula8018
    @aiktanarula8018 3 роки тому +1

    Mam this is not as good as ur crpc and cpc classes

    • @GOLEGAL
      @GOLEGAL  3 роки тому

      I think content is good but yes presentation is not as good as my current subjects videos.

  • @sajid142
    @sajid142 4 роки тому

    Kindly private video of ipc

  • @popularshub
    @popularshub Рік тому

    Padai kru ki apko dekhu mam 😢

  • @pavip3099
    @pavip3099 2 роки тому

    What an rubbish fire cracking add on this vedio?

  • @tarunroy2156
    @tarunroy2156 2 роки тому

    Madam ap ki shadi ho ge na😔😔😔😔

  • @justicefrequent
    @justicefrequent 3 роки тому

    You have missed atmost important maxim and landmark case laws relating to dying declaration. Please add them.

  • @raviprakashdwivedi8324
    @raviprakashdwivedi8324 4 роки тому

    Thanks

  • @shreegiribasavaraj7411
    @shreegiribasavaraj7411 4 роки тому +1

    Good