Section 32 of Indian Evidence Act|| Tutorial || Go legal
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 жов 2024
- Section 32
Statements, written or verbal, of relevant facts made by a person who is dead, or who cannot be found, or who has become incapable of giving evidence, or whose attendance cannot be procured, without an amount of delay or expense which under the circumstances of the case appears to the Court unreasonable, are themselves relevant facts in the following cases-
when it relates to cause of death: When the statement is made by a person as to the cause of his death, or as to any of the circumstances of the transaction which resulted in his death, in cases in which the cause of that person’s death comes into question.
(1)Such statements are relevant whether the person who made them was or was not, at the time when they were made, under expectation of death, and whatever may be the nature of the proceeding in which the cause of his death comes into question.
(2)or is made in course of business: When the statement was made by such person in the ordinary course of business, and in particular when it consists of any entry or memorandum made by him in books kept in the ordinary course of business, or in the discharge of professional duly; or of an acknowledgment written or signed by him of the receipt of money, goods, securities or property of any kind; or of a document used in commerce written or signed by him; or of the date of a letter or other document usually dated, written or signed by him.
(3)or against interest of maker: When the statement is against the pecuniary or proprietary interest of the person making it or when, if true, it would expose him or would have exposed him to a criminal prosecution or to a suit for damages.
(4)or gives opinion as to public right or custom, or matters of general interests: When the statement gives the opinion of any such person, as to the existence of any public right or custom or matter of public or general interest, of the existence of which, if it existed he would have been likely to be aware, and when such statement was made before any controversy as to such right, custom or matter had arisen.
(5)or relates to existence of relationship: When the statement relates to the existence of any relationship by blood, marriage or adoption between persons as to whose relationship by blood, marriage or adoption the person making the statement had special means of knowledge, and when the statement was made before the question in dispute was raised.
(6)or is made in will or deed relating to family affairs: When the statement relates to the existence of any relationship by blood, marriage or adoption between persons deceased, and is made in any will or deed relating to the affairs of the family to which any such deceased person belonged, or in any family pedigree, or upon any tombstone, family portrait, or other thing on which such statements are usually made, and when such statement was made before the question in dispute was raised.
(7)or is document relating to transaction mentioned in section 13, clause (a): When the statement is contained in any deed, will or other document which relates to any such transaction as is mentioned in section 13, clause (a).
(8)or is made by several persons and expresses feelings relevant to matter in question: When the statement was made by a number of persons, and expressed feelings or impressions on their pan relevant to the matter in question.
Do follow us on Instagram @go.legal
Join us for Online Live Classes
Contact 8383843679
This is the first video of i have seen that can give tough fight to finology legal and theory of abrogation....keep it up...!! Crystal clear concept..!!
Thank you so much for appreciation...
Finology legal is flawed. So much editing almost after every two sentences. And the topic they choose is childish and only for 1st year law student or non law students preparing for competitive exams.
I just don't like finology , cut paste, Childish subject dealing...
Good for Non- law student...
Your mode of explaining things acclaimed as a masterpiece
Geetanjli ji you are doing a fantastic job.... Impeccable job...
Super madam... I watched ur all vedio, SPL on limitation act super..
All topics u nailed mam..🙏🙏 thank you so much
Excellent teaching
Regards from Pakistan. You are explaining it so well and making it easier for me to understand law of evidence
Thankuu so much for the lecyire very well explained🎉
Good information
one of the best-explianed videos...... keep it up... the concept was very clear and easy to understand....!!!!
Nice explanation 32(5)).it is applicable in so many civil matters.
Wow...best explanation on the online source...👌👌👌 i haven't words !! 🤗🔰🏆
Great explanation. One advice what ever you are explaining should also appear on screen in form of text
Vedio is to the point nd informative ...mam you cover all that points in your vedios which is not covered in any other channel's vedios ..keep uploading such a stuff 👍❤️
Exellent teaching.. Superb
Very well explained.....
Keep it up.....
💯💯💯 nice class mam
Thank you for explaining this section its helping me lot but one request from my friends
kindly add subtitle it will be more helpful
You have missed atmost important maxim and landmark case laws relating to dying declaration. Please add them.
Excellent lecture thank u so much mam tday my IEA exams maam
Thank you 😊 for explaining this section so clearly ...continue the good work...really helpful..keep it up!..👍
Very informative
You have some skills ... keep uploading more videos
This was very good and helpful
Your video was very helpful madem
Very Nice lecture madam, thank u .madam can a daying declaration be acted upon without corroboration??plz madam explain this with case law .
Nice vedio
Thanks so much ma'am for this video
It is so helpful 👍
Good morning Mam
I listened your speeches on 32 IEA
I have a question: let us suppose a female went missing from more than 7 years. A statement given regarding demanding dowry and cruelty by her parents in court are admissible for convicting under 498a? This question is based on your explanation. Plz
Nice
Good
Explain circumstances in which statement of person who can not be called as witness becomes relevant ?????
👍👍
Gajab 😊
Well explained ❤
Thnk u
Thanks
Dd can be record by anyone evidencary value of dd vary if dd record by magistrate evidencary value will be high if record by police then low if record by pvt person then minor corroboration need for it
Thanku so much
Good explanation, thank you ma'am!
Thnq so much mam. 🙏
👌👍👏👏👏👏
Thank you mam
Mam ye guidelines kis case mein di gyi thi kindly reply mam 🙏
Mam census record of Rajasthan state ko evidence ke roop me use kar sakte hai kya
Vry good mamm.thaxxxxx..
Nice video di
Thank u
Corroborative evidence kya hote h
Thanks ☺️
Upload more lectures
Thankyou ❤
पीड़ित(Victim ) पुरुष भी तो हो सकता है जो आप बार-बार स्त्री का उदहारण दे रहे है |
🙏🙏🙏
Your lecture should be with written form other wise unable to follow you.
Yis question ka answer ye likh sakte hai kya
Pranam
आप सही बात करते हैं लेकिन हिन्दी में होता तो शायद ज्यादा लोग लाभ ले सकते थे।
namaskrrr ...
Specify pakala narayan vs emperer case
Ma'am apne 3rd clause sahi se nhi kraya
Clause 3 not clearly explained
There is nothing mention in the bare act about who can record dying declaration...
Yes, you are right...
There are SC judgments on that
Anyone can record dying declaration. nothing specific is given about it in this act, who can record it.
Baad wale clause ke examples nahi diye jiske liye video chalaya tha
Aap naak se q baat krti ho jiske wajah se apka voice clearly sunai nahi deta
Mam this is not as good as ur crpc and cpc classes
I think content is good but yes presentation is not as good as my current subjects videos.
Kindly private video of ipc
Padai kru ki apko dekhu mam 😢
What an rubbish fire cracking add on this vedio?
Madam ap ki shadi ho ge na😔😔😔😔
You have missed atmost important maxim and landmark case laws relating to dying declaration. Please add them.
Thanks
Good
Thank you mam
Good explanation...