Man that is wild. Factory reported 0-60 is 8.2 seconds and the dealer where I’m buying it claims 8.4 seconds. Did you chip yours? Did you launch with the brake held? 1 second extra is just nuts. I wonder if it’s the cold weather.
@@Medziplyn wait they have the 2022 model in manual? Local dealership straight up told me it's not a thing :'( . Anyways. Looking forward to the results. Btw, was your TC off? And did you launch with the brake here?
@@Medziplyn hey. Did you guys ever end up testing the MT? I wasn't aware a manual option was available. Would have bought that one in a snap had I known. Now I'm stuck with the dsg 😂
now I'll explain why it is approximately 7.22 even if it could be 7.50, the reasoning lies in the fact that the acceleration also changes according to the tires used with the 17 the rim takes less time to turn and weighs even less . I tried it on my mazda 2 with the 15: 185-65 r15 I do 10.2 instead with the 185-60 r16 I do 10.7 a difference of 50 hundredths of a second
This cant be stock. Especially the elasticity measurements look more like ~190hp with a big bump in torque, its quicker than an i20N or Leon III 1.8 TSI. The Leon has the same gear ratios and is only around 100kg heavier, so its a good comparision.
Yeah but its stock. The road had 0.2% ascend angle and everything is legit. 1.5 tsi is bumpy engine, look at our other videos with this motor. It doesnt has turbo lag like other bigger and stronger engines. 1.8 tsi was fine, but it had freakin big turbo lag and same is for i20N.
now I'll explain why it is approximately 7.22 even if it could be 7.50, the reasoning lies in the fact that the acceleration also changes according to the tires used with the 17 the rim takes less time to turn and weighs even less . I tried it on my mazda 2 with the 15: 185-65 r15 I do 10.2 instead with the 185-60 r16 I do 10.7 a difference of 50 hundredths of a second
DSG feels much slower than before. Also the engine sounds like it's going to overrev. It's not too pleasant of a sound. I think the 1.0 TSI sounds more refined.
@bahae eddine Ibiza is 1200+ kilo ... This video is stage 1 or with downpipe .... Or downhill. Stock is 8.2 Suzuki swift sport 140hp is 970 kilo. = 7.3 to 100 km.
@@edenazulay4829 now I'll explain why it is approximately 7.22 even if it could be 7.50, the reasoning lies in the fact that the acceleration also changes according to the tires used with the 17 the rim takes less time to turn and weighs even less . I tried it on my mazda 2 with the 15: 185-65 r15 I do 10.2 instead with the 185-60 r16 I do 10.7 a difference of 50 hundredths of a second
now I'll explain why it is approximately 7.22 even if it could be 7.50, the reasoning lies in the fact that the acceleration also changes according to the tires used with the 17 the rim takes less time to turn and weighs even less . I tried it on my mazda 2 with the 15: 185-65 r15 I do 10.2 instead with the 185-60 r16 I do 10.7 a difference of 50 hundredths of a second
@@agdwhite5421 I've had other people time it too and 7.9 doesn't come out. in a few months I will put a video where I will put the 0 100 with the dragy
Pěkné! Stejné jak moje ofce 132kw. Je fajn, že koncern začal dávat do malých aut zase čtyřválce :)
Pretty fast for a small car.
zaten pretty fast, small car'da olur kardo. tiguan motoru var ufacık arabada. boru mu.
One of the last fun cheap cars nowadays
it depends on what is fun for you :)
Muy bonito vehículo, tengo uno con el cuadro digital y es una maravilla en curvas. Doy fe de su desempeño. Gracias. Sigue subiendo videos.
This car is freak. Especially at 100-200 acceleration.
Can beat 2.0lt ~200hp Diesel sedans
How did you do 0-100 in 7.2? Factory reported 0-100 in 8.2...
In some tests and magazines Its reported at 7.5s, the car weight is only 1050kg for 150hp.
Downhill.
@@ilyesbraik8899 are you sure its 1050kg? the manufacturer says 1220kg
Man that is wild. Factory reported 0-60 is 8.2 seconds and the dealer where I’m buying it claims 8.4 seconds. Did you chip yours? Did you launch with the brake held? 1 second extra is just nuts. I wonder if it’s the cold weather.
No its all stock. In couple days we are going to measure Ibiza FR 1.5 TSi with manual transmission. Im really excited what data we get.
@@Medziplyn wait they have the 2022 model in manual? Local dealership straight up told me it's not a thing :'( . Anyways. Looking forward to the results. Btw, was your TC off? And did you launch with the brake here?
@@Medziplyn hey. Did you guys ever end up testing the MT? I wasn't aware a manual option was available. Would have bought that one in a snap had I known. Now I'm stuck with the dsg 😂
now I'll explain why it is approximately 7.22 even if it could be 7.50, the reasoning lies in the fact that the acceleration also changes according to the tires used with the 17 the rim takes less time to turn and weighs even less . I tried it on my mazda 2 with the 15: 185-65 r15 I do 10.2 instead with the 185-60 r16 I do 10.7 a difference of 50 hundredths of a second
@@magliana-lb7kf thanks for the explanation. Ive been thinking about this and tire diameter can also give false speedo reading
This cant be stock. Especially the elasticity measurements look more like ~190hp with a big bump in torque, its quicker than an i20N or Leon III 1.8 TSI. The Leon has the same gear ratios and is only around 100kg heavier, so its a good comparision.
Yeah but its stock. The road had 0.2% ascend angle and everything is legit. 1.5 tsi is bumpy engine, look at our other videos with this motor. It doesnt has turbo lag like other bigger and stronger engines. 1.8 tsi was fine, but it had freakin big turbo lag and same is for i20N.
Strange working DSG
Buen coche majo
Stage 1 or downhill.
I tried this car with dragy and best 0 100 time is 8.03
now I'll explain why it is approximately 7.22 even if it could be 7.50, the reasoning lies in the fact that the acceleration also changes according to the tires used with the 17 the rim takes less time to turn and weighs even less . I tried it on my mazda 2 with the 15: 185-65 r15 I do 10.2 instead with the 185-60 r16 I do 10.7 a difference of 50 hundredths of a second
@@magliana-lb7kf true reasoning but when you don't have a smaller diameter the risk of slippage is higher is this also can influence the acceleration
So faster than skoda fabia 1.5 tsi?
top speed ????
Questa va forte almeno ha cubatura 1.5
DSG feels much slower than before. Also the engine sounds like it's going to overrev. It's not too pleasant of a sound. I think the 1.0 TSI sounds more refined.
fuel consuption bro?
Around 6.0, but if you go fast 7.5. Also if you go to the job and go home with automatic pilot is a little less. Enjoy the ride.
fake ! ...
leon 1.8 180HP DSG is 7.2
@bahae eddine
Ibiza is 1200+ kilo ...
This video is stage 1 or with downpipe ....
Or downhill.
Stock is 8.2
Suzuki swift sport 140hp is 970 kilo. = 7.3 to 100 km.
@@edenazulay4829 now I'll explain why it is approximately 7.22 even if it could be 7.50, the reasoning lies in the fact that the acceleration also changes according to the tires used with the 17 the rim takes less time to turn and weighs even less . I tried it on my mazda 2 with the 15: 185-65 r15 I do 10.2 instead with the 185-60 r16 I do 10.7 a difference of 50 hundredths of a second
7.22? It was 8.3 😂
now I'll explain why it is approximately 7.22 even if it could be 7.50, the reasoning lies in the fact that the acceleration also changes according to the tires used with the 17 the rim takes less time to turn and weighs even less . I tried it on my mazda 2 with the 15: 185-65 r15 I do 10.2 instead with the 185-60 r16 I do 10.7 a difference of 50 hundredths of a second
@@magliana-lb7kf Yes i know pretty well how it works, but in the video the 0-100 its 8.3 and not 7.22, thats all
@@agdwhite5421 check better, I timed it and I don't get 8.3 but out of 7 seconds and 15. obviously the speedometer is wrong but 8 seconds are not.
@@magliana-lb7kf Yes i check it again, its 7.9 to be exact
@@agdwhite5421 I've had other people time it too and 7.9 doesn't come out. in a few months I will put a video where I will put the 0 100 with the dragy
Stage 1 jajajaja