Jascha Horenstein on Artur Nikisch (1969)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лип 2024
  • Jascha Horenstein on Artur Nikisch
    Interviews with Paul Hoeffler (New York, Nov 1969) and William Malloch (Los Angeles, July 1969)

КОМЕНТАРІ • 10

  • @rich8037
    @rich8037 2 роки тому +1

    These are really fascinating memories of a great musician, *by* a great musician.

  • @mgconlan
    @mgconlan Рік тому

    If you've never heard Artur Nikisch's recording of Beethoven's Fifth Symphony, please do. Though it was made in 1914 and sounds like it, Nikisch played it with fast tempi and a reduced orchestra, anticipating the period-instrument approach to Beethoven that's become common today.

  • @kratzkamer
    @kratzkamer 2 роки тому

    fascinating-thanks

  • @maestroclassico5801
    @maestroclassico5801 2 роки тому +1

    Horenstein started at a very young age so he was around Nikisch, Furtwangler, Alban Berg, Richard Strauss and others but he was therefore still around in the early 70s to talk about them.

    • @maestroclassico5801
      @maestroclassico5801 2 роки тому +1

      He said that Alban Berg was a very kind man, and that Richard Strauss was made of ICE.

    • @macksawyer6221
      @macksawyer6221 Рік тому

      ​@@maestroclassico5801So what? Was his music made of ice?

    • @maestroclassico5801
      @maestroclassico5801 Рік тому

      @@macksawyer6221 No which makes it even more interesting that a composer with so much dramatic content was considered not very personable. What is your point?

  • @karldelavigne8134
    @karldelavigne8134 2 роки тому

    What a shame Horenstein didn't hear Mahler to compare him to Nikisch.

  • @barney6888
    @barney6888 2 роки тому +3

    The maestro is very tolerant of these academic and presumptuous questions. "Style awareness" is one such moment. If a great composer is a "genius" and "ahead of their time", then style awareness becomes moot, as the style of the day is already out of date. "Style awareness" is illogical. Fortunately being creative was assigned, by God, to creative people, not academics. What makes an academic? An academic is someone who, without any talent, pretends to talk with a pretentious authority on any given topic so as to raise themselves up in social status. They attempt to compensate their lack of ingenuity with high marks. They can also be spotted attempting to lure students to "go swimming" at the local pool, and coming over for dinner to "let their hair down a little". Of course students who refuse get bad marks, but at least these few students go on to be the true artists and, thanks to God, not an academic. Beware the academic.

    • @giuseppedepau2909
      @giuseppedepau2909 10 місяців тому

      Condivido appieno.,fesserie dette con autorita