YouTube Launches NEW Monetization Feature!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 чер 2024
- 🚀 GET FULL ACCESS TO vidIQ FOR $1: bit.ly/3Ktt7sp
UA-cam is introducing new monetization options that should help creators avoid limited ads on their videos and the dreaded yellow icon. Here's the full details in just 160 seconds!
Creator Insider video: • Introducing: Timestamp...
Yellow Icons support page: support.google.com/youtube/th...
⏱️⏱️VIDEO CHAPTERS⏱️⏱️
0:00 - An intriguing UA-cam monetization update
0:26 - Requesting a review on limited ad (yellow icon) videos
1:38 - Can you fix limited ad videos?
#moresubscribers2024 #moreviews2024 #GrowYourChannel
🚀 GET FULL ACCESS TO vidIQ FOR $1: bit.ly/3Ktt7sp
Nice
Thank bro info
Positive direction
Thanks, I am not sure how this will benefit my relaxing nature videos. My idea is to simulate being there without extra distractions.
@@TheCreativeHeadSpaceplease I heard that using vidIQ helps to gain subscribers and views
Since you have used it before how true is this thanks
Can i be honest, i think youtube needs to change it's money policy. Creators should be able to earn money IMMEDIATELY. Like, why do you have to have x-amount subscribers to have superchats? Even if i had like 3 people watching my stream, if i could have superchats, a person could just donate something to my stream.
I agree with you. UA-cam is making money off every channel regardless of how big or small. We should definitely be able to make money immediately in some way.
I have an alternative proposal. UA-cam cannot run ads on videos that aren to monetized. They're profiting from content on channels they're throttling. This should be straight up illegal.
@@FundayCreations Yeah right? Why would we have to wait for that?
Fully agree!
Yep. Rumble monetises video immediately.
It give me chills on the Invalid traffic part at the end... this is one of the most problem of the new youtubers.
The greatest problem for new and small UA-camrs is limiting the traffic. You cannot grow if you do not get traffic. There is one SEO technique that beats this, advertisement. Six month campaign and then you'll be established enough to have regular traffic. Then UA-cam will just not notify your subs of your content. UA-cam is not content creator friendly unless you are a picked winner.
@@Gamers-Haunt Yeah, forget to earn money on YT, unless you're a big channel from 2006 or so. VidIQ is ist a commercial channel trying to see that VidIQ thing to you.
What even is that?
Can you explain what invaild traffic is?
@@DestructX TLDR: Invalid Traffic is traffic that is fraudulent or accidental click-throughs.
Advertisers want their ads to be seen by real people. Not bots or any other artificial means to boost channel view counts. Advertisers also want people to be there on purpose. Not through some accidently click or via an intrusive advertisement designed to boost traffic.
It is a bit more complex, but basically advertisers want to ensure they're getting what they're paying for. Anything that doesn't match that criteria is invalid traffic.
Monetization from the beginning would be the best thing for me, and it sounds fair.
or at least a much lower cap say 100 subscribers and 100 hours watch time - it would at least show the person is invested in the platform without it being so hard
@@DartsReview 100%
UA-cam is Getting complicated Day by day 🙄🙄🙄
Well, it is not that complicated actually. What's complicated is actually to hook the audience. You'll never know exactly what they really want to watch. Facts.
not this right here is actually good
ik
Yup, forget to earn any money on YT, unless you're a big channel from 2006 or so. VidIQ is just a commercial channel trying to sell that VidIQ thing to you.
@@AudioStoryWick Bro 100% Correct. I have no idea why some videos performing well and some not.
My most viewed video got slapped with the yellow dollar sign. Requested a manual review. It was determined the decision was correct, with the feedback saying “this video may or may not contain content which isn’t suitable for most advertisers.” It had been uploaded for about 20 months at that point and was driving about 80% of the revenue my channel was generating. The biggest frustration for me so far on this journey. But the show goes on!
this happened to my other channel and I was pissed because I would have made some paper on that vid smh it's still doing numbers after months, but I can't see the revenue from it cause of that yellow dollar sign
I feel for you. I have similar experience too.
They didn't give you a better answer after resubmitting it?
How much UA-cam paying you dear?
@@spookybooscarystorytime nope! The email response literally said “After a manual review, we have confirmed this video may contain content not suitable for most advertisers.” There was a link to the advertiser friendly guidelines as well but no specific section was pointed out. I think it was intentionally vague and nonspecific 🤖
Not just videos, I have had a community post taken down by UA-cam for unclear reasons that left me puzzled. And of course, I have also had "limited monetization" slapped on a few of our videos that has truly puzzled us. So I hope this new feature will help clear the air somewhat.
I don't see the point of UA-cam having a "is it for kids or not" option then when you select not for kids and upload a video with topics directed to adults, you get age-restricted. Like make it make sense. So what was the purpose of the option "not for kids" there for smh
I believe UA-cam got into major legal issues a few years ago so implemented this to basically protect themselves :)
Now we need to fix videos being automatically set to "made for kids" I've seen several videos from one of my favorite creators that have been set to "made for kids" when he purposely put swears in the video to stop that from happening!
Why would a video automatically set to made for kids if you manually set it up to not made for kids? 🤔
yea had same issue
@@DeepestQuotesAnd exactly. It makes no sense!
Is it a minority of people that are like me where I've been monetised for years and yet never once gotten demonetised on a single video? I remember years ago watching UA-camrs go on about this as if it's a massive problem, yet I've never experienced it (thankfully). Am I just lucky or what? Because I see some people complaining about it and then I check out their content and it's just them using footage of films or TV shows and I think 'well obviously that's going to get demonetised.'
It depends on your content. Imagine channels about guns, murder, etc. Some advertisers don’t want their brands associated with certain content. Obviously, if you don’t make such controversial content, you wouldn’t encounter that.
It would be interesting to see a breakdown from YT on the percentages of channels/videos that are demonetized and for what reasons.
UA-cam doesn't even follow it's own policies. They age-restricted one of my videos although it falls way short in terms of potential inappropriateness compared to dozens and dozens and dozens of other videos which are not restricted. It's almost as if they have no clear standards which they follow.
I hope they begin reviewing my appeal for “community guidelines violations” as they gave zero reason as to why it did!!
I hope so too.
Doubt it, I got a strike for minor endangerment in a youtube short, problem is there was only 3 adults in the clip, the youtube team admitted that they where wrong and there was no minors, but said I had to keep the strike and the 3 month ban on applying for monetization, they're a disgrace
Happened to me before, and they responded and fixed it within an hour
don't worry the youtube appeal team is a gigachad
guys I sent this appeal over two years ago
@@ItzMythOfficial LOL ok now that's unfortunate
Almost there to the 4000 hours of Watch time. Don't give up keep uploading keep getting better creators
Am also at hours 3,431
Same here and it feels the watch time is slower 😅
@@UcheAgoh Did they give a you a room to apply when you hit 3000 hours and a 500 subs?
Yes for YT Partner program
@@UcheAgoh Same, so you are waiting to reach the threshold for you to receive the PIN?
Trust me any adjustment by UA-cam means they are losing lawsuits.
I got limited ads ...there is absolutely nothing wrong with my thumbnail or video just a stupid decision... i have seen worse than my video but UA-cam won't change there minds ...😢
I keep telling you, their whole system is extremely corrupt. They only expose things when they're forced to by a court. After 10 years you shall still be same position and asking same questions.
And so much to transparency, they took down my comments at noon because they hate constructive criticism.
To late. YT literally destroyed my Yt account by suppressing me. I was getting 4-5 digits on all my videos and then when this happened I rarely broke past 3 digits.
I'd love to see three digits on my videos. That's how hard they're suppressing me. Then I look at channels in the same niche and see how they're growing or sustaining themselves. It's disheartening.
@@Gamers-Haunt Your thumbnail and title game is holding you back. It's no coincidence that your best performing short has an amazing thumbnail!
@@winstology101 Those are definitely two areas I can improve. A huge problem I have is the provable throttling. When performance is soft-capped, it is hard to determine what works and what does not.
The Choo Choo Charles video blew up when Choo Choo Charles was new and trending. Arguably a great thumbnail. The success though is more attributable to timing.
The shorts algorism is fairer than the other algorisms. I need to invest in making more shorts. Names and descriptions are where I struggle a bit. Any advice?
@@Gamers-Haunt Personally I'm still figuring it out but VidIQ have made quite a few vids on thumbnails if you need a starting point. Nowadays if you don't force the user to click your video YT will give the impressions to someone who does.
Finally it is here. I saw their video as they released it! Thanks Rob for your take on this UA-cam News! 🙏
Speaking of updates. The new format with the comments on the side and the videos below is extremely ugly and feels terrible. I truly hope they go back on this.
That's true.
You can read comments while seeing the video and that is a plus.
No, best monetisation update would be allowing smaller channels. Sick of the clickbait titles from vidiq...
I fell for the clickbait and hoped so as well :(
@@joli9127 its not clickbait bro
😠 yeah fell for this one also 😠
Aye OnG fam. I mean at least let ya boy only hit 2k watch hours 😅 4k hours be for the 🦅 when starting out
Unless they changed the title in the last four hours, it says "New", not "Best".
I just wish you could remove either sound or image after they’re uploaded
This makes me hopeful. I have struggled with this more on my balloon ASMR channel than anything else and a lot of times it'll be months down the line when UA-cam decides to "demonetize" my video (I'm not even monetized yet and I'm told this!). It makes me wonder what sets it off. Is it someone reporting it to UA-cam? Or does the UA-cam system just work at snail speed?
I LITERALLY HIT OVER 1000 in a day! I was at 700 and this morning, I am pushing over 1000! I am just shocked. But I do now have to sit and think out strategy to keep this going. What I DO believe has helped: Responding to comments!❤❤❤
Congrats bro keep going 🥳🥳
Thanks for sharing
I hope youtube gives us a feature that would allow to replace music or background sounds outside of youtube library so that it wouldn't require one deleting and posting it again could be very helpful for content creators especially ones related to sports and stuff
That's why I have copyright mark on my recent Nightcore Mix 1 hour video :(
Now if they would just do it for the RED $... Im tired of NEVER figuring out Why a few of my videos get demonetized! if they would just tell us, we could learn from it...
Thanks for the news! Will be a while for me to get monetization but loving the journey and my tribe.
The only problem is with reused content policy, even with a video thats been made originally by the creator itself, still being considered reused just because they looks so similar.
Yess true
They even tell you that they _know your content is originally yours_ , but they still tell you they refuse monetisation because they accuse you of _reusing content._
this is happen to me i show them my documents of compiles video that i edit or create but UA-cam said my appeal not enough visuals now my channel not gonna monetize and i delete all my videos
@@doffymingo3687 just today my appeal worked. I showed them my script, BTS of editing, tts voice website etc. They probably suspected that i use AI, which i proved them wrong.
@@doffymingo3687dude you only have 18 subs😅
Ik might never happen but the best monetization update would be to cut down the shorts videos views from million to the thousands or combine shorts views as watch time hours as one
I’m still waiting for the new thumbnail tool
This feature is a few month old already. I used it (editing and reuploading), but often I've got new time stamps on the edited video... that was becoming shorter and shorter.
1:44 'yeaaa- nono' got me rolling lmao
I was getting millions of views then all of the sudden two days ago all my videos stopped dead in their tracks at the same time. I hope I didn’t do anything wrong
It would be even better if the automatic detection system added a timestamp rather than having to "request a review" to get the timestamp. I'm very thankful for this change regardless.
Version Videos needs to be a Feature. Uploading the new version to the same url. There would be a small drop down tab to see the version 1 or 2 or N. This would help refine the main idea of one video.
Thanks for the info 🙂. I hope we all grow our channels and never give up.
I submitted a review thinking it was gonna take me to a reason as to why one of my vids got ad limited, and now I fear I put my channel in jeopardy, so I'm trying to call them to tell them I was seeing if I could see what was wrong with my video.
Does this include YT shorts?
Great! Thanks for sharing this update!
I was trying to verify my UA-cam channel, whatever I do I get an error saying " there was a problem sending a verification code" why’s that? I’m trying for months now!!!!
This is awesome for newer UA-cam channel creators on how to best make changes to help with keeping more channels monetized
Could you make a video about video slideshows and if they can be monetized and if so how best to meet the criteria?
ReReview is a must in that case. And yeah we can just re-upload it after cutting off the bad part. But having the the revenue in escrow while it’s being approved is also an option.
I have one viral shorts video, I used to get an avarage of 1 to 10k views. But since my viral video my avarage daily views are only 100. Does anyone know how this happened and what is can do to fix it?
Some transparency is really a good thing here! Unfortunately not for me as I'm not monetised yet and honestly don't expect to ever get monetised because something that isn't transparent at all is how the algorithm works (or in fact: does not work).
0:54 this humour hahahaha
😂 the exclusive view of UA-cam's "human team" of reviewers got a laugh out of me
Great information, thanks for keeping us updated, much appreciated.
Hoping for more growth soon. Keep grinding guys!!!
your videos i always found very informative. The growing phase in UA-cam is quite hard it brings so much disappointment but giving up is never a solution as we do not know that when the turning point is. we must appreciate one another work and struggle. we are near the change.
Wonder if you could edit your footage and re-upload the second video without the issues and get monetized for that.
2:35 For real. IVT has been wrecking small creators and the problem seems to be getting worse.
Thank you. You made it very clear. easy to understand!
Ive learned that after a while, after getting monetized, thats its not necessarily the subscriber amount, but the views that are more important as far as what you are paid.
subscribers only matter to hit the req amount to monetise, its engagement like the views as you say that matter :)
might have anything to do with a new EU regulation on the topic of online services (not) explaining their users their decisions?
This will save a lot of time in the long run for sure
They do need an option to fix and review. Good start though
I agree completely. Better late than never
How did you guys get footage of UA-cam's "Human" experts?
This will help us to refrain from mistakes
UA-cam has to stop taken away views every day!!!
It's been two weeks and it's still going... They are taking 3-7 views overall. Every day. 1 views from ''that'' video, 2 views from ''this'' video... randomly
I have like 7 subs and very-very low views, why do they do this?
Long overdue. Thanks for the info
I really wish they would re-enable links in shorts.
Vidiq I got your app and everything I don't understand what else could I do to improve my channel you got any tips, please? ❤
Sure! You got this!
You also might want to check these videos:
ua-cam.com/video/r1xv4Nvh-6w/v-deo.htmlsi=kPFVoL5n_Vzg_Gc0
ua-cam.com/video/A0DegpwfIco/v-deo.htmlsi=MWgTMtB7-qqCbEPn
ua-cam.com/video/IR1NGI9Q334/v-deo.htmlsi=-UVHVdc_nZwQyV3T
@@vidIQ thanks
UA-cam has NEVER been good at explaining new or old guidelines nor does it contact its monetized creators. Thanks man for all youre info all the time!
However I was demonetized for non activity in 6 months which I never knew nor did UA-cam let me know. They changed guidelines which is fine but I learned the hard way
those ‘human experts’ looked as though they eat Smash 🤔😜😂
Me watching with 350 subs, and 540 watch hours hoping they nerfed the requirements once more
Oo finally youtube makes a good update
If you are reading this. Meaning you are lucky. We can reach that monetization. For now, let us aim in bringing what is best for our viewers. Because it is where it starts. Always remember. To be successful is to put in effort and hard work. Good luck to all of us🥰🙏
Sounds more like a control and censor mechanism for the long run rather than a "creatorfriendly" change. Typical for growing companies nowadays...
You can do desktop mode on mobile phones to use this feature though.
It's a start, I guess ? Thank you for the video.
We got you!
@@vidIQ 😁
Thank you
ohh, Rob! What have you done. Now all hell will break loose. "Everyone (applicable)" will opt this option and UA-cam may face crashes 😭
0:44 Why were those videos limited by UA-cam? I don't see anything wrong with them.
My 2nd apply for monetazation was denied, which video i made mistake i don't know
Thank You 😊
I've learned alot about how UA-cam works from your videos! Thank you!
Control tube wants control. My earnings are capped. Everytime im up they kick me down. Feels like communism
I only get it on my live streams.
Doesn't seem worthwhile to me chasing it as the vods get low veiws
The monetization policies are so silly. If I can watch shows like Criminal Minds and horror movies on TV and UA-cam where they are fully monetized, then UA-cam's creators, who are their customers, should be able to be monetized just like those shows. With that said, it must not have rolled out to me yet as 2 of mine were approved and are now green but the two that remain yellow still have the generic response and I cannot resubmit nor see what the problem is. Oh well.
do you guys use end screen anymore?
Do you know whether this applies for channels that get denied request for channel monetization? My channel is eligible for monetization but I was denied by You Tube - and the only reason given was “harmful content”. I don’t believe anything on my channel is harmful but it’s a channel focused on natural healing so who knows which video is offending them. I have over 1000 videos so I can’t guess. I’d love more details so I can apply again and know what videos need to be edited or taken down. Otherwise it’ll be impossible to get monetized. Do you know whether I will get this information if I reapply for channel monetization? Thank you!
Was it useful for broken age restrictions?
This was an interesting update. Too long in the making, if you ask me. But hey, better late than never.
Definitely! It's long overdue.
Truly long overdue but worth it.
Thankyou its help me alot to grow my CHannel 🎉
Invalid traffic is something I cant picture youtube fixing. Anyone can attack your channel with fake views and destroy your monetization
This is a surprisingly huge step in the right direction
This is a great update.
Keep going everyone. Day 3 here 🍿
SHOULD I POST MORE VIDEOS ?? I HAVE MORE THAT 30 VIDEO BUT STILL AT 100 SUBSCRIBERS!!!!!
Oh so people's opinions can fail us now?
sometimes, it could be copyright issues, I mute my music in some of my videos, even though the owners allow permission to use it, but I still mute it just to be safe. Thanks to the owners, though.
I wonder if this works for shorts too.
I am not yet monetized. Totally looking forward to it now! LOL
Thank god! It’s about damn time!!!
Thanks❤
It would be most helpful to explain how you have more subscribers but less watch hours. Also explain why the watch hours keep reducing when your subscribers have increased.
Thank you brother for sharing Like
Thank you for this.
Thanks again VidIQ for the update.
Very informative,thanks for sharing
Thanks for❤vidiQ