Join our Discord for ADDITIONAL and INSTANTENEOUS SOURCES that get past through CENSORSHIP along with Discussions with people all over the world regarding the issue of the Ukraine War & Military Tech Talk: discord.gg/UyHTF47f7T Full Specifications in Description! Be sure to check out my Review, Specifications, and Analysis of the 3 Latest Tanks showcased at International Army Forums from Russia, Poland, and the US (Proryv-3, PT-16, & Griffin): ua-cam.com/video/En64n3a_dA8/v-deo.html
This aircraft looks like a real dogfighter, but the F35 has advanced electronic capabilities. It can send out tweets and Facebook comments in battle. It even wins air wars on UA-cam. It is so advancd that the pilot can insert a further quarter (Million bucks) so that the pilot gets an extra three lives.
+madmanjshum Putin is a theif just like most all pollititon's. NATO will destroy Russian troop's if they f**** around much more in Europe. As the airborn say ' we will put your face in the mud'.
Steve R, in case of real war with Russia it's more likely that NATO will break up cause none of those countries want to be nuked for irresponsable US federal goverment's policy. Shit, I wouldn't be surprised even if almost every state of the US would declare independence from Washington in that case.
Yeah, that's true. In fact, Mig-35 has some parts that are gonna be in the Mig corporation's 5th generation fighter. In the same way like Su-35 has many parts that went into 5th generation heavy jet fighter T-50 Pak Fa.
Thank you for uploading this excellent compilation! I have just added video from today's official introduction into manufacturing of MiG-35 (full version, 30+ mins) to my channel for all MiG fans!
Maybe SU-35 @ MIG-39 Next Gen , Focus On Heavy Duty Double Fiels Boost Long Rangers Because You Don't Have Carried out of The Sea World. Stealth Mode must Be. Night Version Calculation Hard Ware System.. Subject To Sprotection Land Traget In One Second Marking FiveMore Target, This Is Heavy Duty Needed Proof that.
Thanks for the English subs! MiG-35 looks to be a very potent and deadly aircraft. Perfect for export as well, Iran should order 50 on license production immediately!
The acrobatics are dazzling , so the MIG lives on . Just be careful not to release all the specifications , the Americans would love a copy to replace their F-35 , now used as a tank , because it couldn't fly .
William J Greklek III Where is this F-22 , if it flew in Syria , the US ordered that their planes avoid contact with the Russians ? For what reason ? All in the records .
I did an interview with an Abrams Tanker named Strizhi who has recently started talking (and teaching) the people behind the C.A.B show, which includes dalek. What I stressed to him before, but finally confirmed by someone actually from the field, is that he claimed in his T-90A Vs. M1A2 Abrams Tank Video he claims that, and I quote, "under intense conditions, the Abrams loader can get in 15 shots per minute if necessary", which is completely false information. The problem with them is that they don't have hand-on experience with the Tanks or Jets they talk about, they only have on the paper reports. The other time was when Dalek was claiming about the TOW-2A that shot the T-90 tank in Syria, that "had it been a TOW-2B, the T-90 would've been fully destroyed", to which I said "there's Kontakt-5 bricks on top of the turret as well" and "Syrian Opposition do posses TOW-2B and more". I linked him a PBS Documentary that shows Syrian Opposition showing a BGM-71E-3B TOW, to which he claimed "That is just the serial number", clearly not watching the PBS Documentary since it's said in the documentary "the Serial number has been scratched off". According to Abrams Tanker Strizhi after talking to Dalek and the CAB people, they apparently thought that a MiG-21 was a 3rd Generation Plane. Strizhi volunteers in an Air Museum (and his mother was a Military Pilot) and gave them a virtual tour of the museum, showing Daleks and CAB's misconceptions about many of the technology that they were "refuting". It's Daleks and CABs show that has actually inspired me to make the T-84 Oplot-M Vs. T-90AM Comparison Video, which is 90% complete and will be uploaded soon. They are biased not for the sake of biased, but just lack information and refuse to review some because of being fanboys of the tech they prefer, while lacking first hand experience in any of their fields.
Ivan Alexeevich He has a UA-cam username with uploads no more in the dozen of Re-Uploads, but sure: - Our Interview (part 1 of 2): ua-cam.com/video/PB_0jHgJgWQ/v-deo.html - Strizhi's Account: ua-cam.com/users/strizhi He told me he's from St. Petersburg, but he doesn't even speak Russian. He's pure American. Was adopted in one of those International Russian Adoptions which were common in the 90's.
The MAKS Demonstration is nice! All this generation labeling is BS.Just because it has less stealth, it's a 4++, like the Su-35S, but both are the only 2 planes with double thrust-vector plane or direction, which 5th Generation planes can't even pull off. Maybe a third plus sign should be added to MiG-35 and Su-35?
+Motor City As I recall, MiG-23 came before the F-14 Tomcat, the Aircraft's that introduced Sweep-Wing Variable Geometry. How the hell are you classifying F-14 with a MiG-29 (which doesn't have Sweep-Wing)? Do you know Aviation? What's next? What would your response be if I'd say "Shit, the F-35B is barely a step up from the Yak-141". Hah!
I'm not talking about which aircraft came first, I'm talking about the better of the two airframes because you cant compare this old school Mig to anything the US has rolled out with since the 1980's, which is where this Mig belongs. It does look cool but it's just so outdated.The F-14 which is a war-time deadly-beast, multiple role dogfighter and time tested for over 20 years.. or this Russian prototype that can only do circles in the air for an airshow, one time. I doubt it can even go mach without, as you might understand "shaking the stick out of your hand". Is the airframe on this even strong enough to launch & land from a carrier? Oh wait, you only have helicopter carriers.. so the world will never know. I was a US Navy fighter pilot for 12 years and some of the Russian comments on here are so misinformed it actually made me laugh (thank you)! It takes much more than a dozen kids in a huge hanger acting like they are working on a part of a toy mock-up. It takes a huge infrastructure of thousands of people, test pilots, wind tunnel testing, avionics and that's not even counting power plant or weapons systems to build, deploy and sustain any new aircraft, let alone a military fighter jet.I understand you are all proud of your country, as you should be. Russia has done some great things in it's past and I get it. But when you go around bashing my country, The United States with what I can only call "Horseshit Information" that you are spoon-fed by the Kremlin, that's when I stop laughing and start typing.One more thing, before you kids start talking more about dropping atomic bombs on the United States you should think twice.. who will you steal technology from after we are gone? China? Be careful, we may be the only friends you still have once China turns their sights north..
You are seriously overrating American aircraft. S-400 would shoot any number of them out of the sky simultaneously. We already know for a fact that Russian radar has no problem spotting f-22.
Ryan Alt ....actually....you have no facts!! Shoot one down than. That's the ONLY fact you will get. Here's a fact.....Russians s300s aren't what they claimed either....hence the quick upgrade to s400 and now working on s500?? Hmmmm.....sounds like an issue??
Very good Fighter for Indian Air force on MMRCA 2.0 deal, I wish our country India will select this jet . Love you Mother Russia. Keep going with new experiment. Good luck
From The AK-47 AK-74 Kalashnikov To AK-176 & S-400 are all proven state of the art technology. There's no flimsiness in Russian language! Don't know much about the new MiG-35, But the Su-35 is (The World's) most low maintenance and agile aircraft with extremely aggressive weaponry and avionics. The Russians are not car nor bike makers. They have always aimed on high technological mega-projects instead, thus they're far ahead than some very overconfident nations.
is it suffering the vibration the american tomcat had with its shortness and its ubrupt virtical stabillizer fins being simular in design lowering them and making them more fish alike may help and would also lengthen its main body adding the ability to carry larger weapons as well.and the shortened arrow head delema with its wings and tail being close proximity unto one another and nothing to provide and man made thust plate at its rear alike an ionic breeze divice of which sweeps and cleans its tail exhaust and if its power is amplified it may cool its exhaust as well of which would help cloak the war bird from modern devices.
+Xiones11 they are still going to make those it just they might need more time but this gives them extra money handy to buy more 4th generation fighters like su 35 mig 35 etc
This Mig-35 I believe could outfly them all. It would be close between the Eurofighter, Rafale, F-22, and MiG-35 but I think the MiG is a little more agile imo. All great planes though.
most people think dogfight dogfight time is over actually it's the opposite with the countermeasures at the end of the day it is the dog fight and the skill of the pilot and the plane
Can a stinger shoot it down? Can it support ground operations, as in Syria, from a low altitude, how durable the frame is against .50cal machine guns? Comparing with "old" Su-25, what are the improvements, after all the alias is "Fulcrum" i.e. 'support', in what ways MiG-35 is better in close-ground support than the "old" one?
- Prolly not, considering modern ECM, that's like asking if an Igla can shoot down a Raptor (doesn't matter if it's stealth or not, an eye lock-on is an eye lock-on). Or if a TOW can pass through Shtora-1 or Konkurs pass Trophy APS. Old Generation Missiles don't work with 21st Century ECM. - Yes. And not only is the frame durable from 12x99mm bullets, but it has 2 engines. So if one is knocked down by a "Stinger" missile, the second engine will bring the aircraft back home. Just a Note: All those Video's in Syria of slow flying Aircraft being shot up by AA on a Technical Toyota Trick "Jihadmobile" are fake and from the game ARMA II. - You're comparing the wrong aircraft. The MiG-29 was an Su-27 Competitor. So the MiG-35 should be compared with the Su-35S. The advantage of both of these planes over any planes, including Western 5th Gen Aircraft, is "Double Thrust Vectoring". Otherwise, much is still classified since it's in Prototype Phase. Like I said, most comparable Aircraft would be the Su-35S, so I assume by your name that you speak Russian so here's a "Declassified" documentary about it (ua-cam.com/video/Rot_r6a8W8Y/v-deo.html). - BONUS: The "old" Su-25 is getting an upgrade to the Su-25M3. But still, different type of aircraft. The M3 will have more precise precision for unguided weaponry and Glonass and Navstar GPS.. The 35's Aircraft's are meant more of Guided and even FCS-N (Future Combat System Network) for Netcentric Warfare.
Did you just ask if a stinger can shoot down a fucking air superiority mach 1+ fighter? No... Stinger can hardly shoot down attack aircraft or any MANPADS for that matter. They can't target any aircraft going above 670km/h because the missile will run out of energy and anything above 2300m is just untouchable except helicopters armed without IR flares.
***** Mmm nah, there were a few incidents in 1980s Afghanistan where 1 engine of an Su-25 was hit by a Stinger, but the Aircraft was able to return to base because of its second engine. 2 months ago in Syria were shot down a SAF MiG-23 and an SAF Su-22 by MANPADS, probably an old Igla System.
Yes, almost every vehicle can be replaced with Foreign Parts. Israel is changing parts of their F-35A's to a new variant, called F-35I for example. Some Ukrainian T-64 Tanks use sights customized from Germany, and so on. However, Russia at its current progress wouldn't want Foreign Parts in their Tech because they were able to Domesticize nearly everything and is now "Made in Russia", weapons and armor of all categories. So to answer your question, it can, but they won't.
Which F15? C, A, E, SE... F15 on itself means shit. And this is new product, prototype series and zero production series are in existence. Latter one being atm under construction.
Long time ago indonesia used to use old MIG, but now it is replaced by SU 27, SU 30 and soon will launch SU 35. Maybe we need this MIG 35 in order to strengthen Indonesia's Air Force......Hail Russian. Каждая эскадрилья..............Индонезии и России дружбу с момента обретения независимости Индонезии
Well the jet is just a little bit powerfull than US counterparts or eurofighter, but it's 2,5 times cheaper. Russian military equipment is extremely both military and economically effective.
Not really. Those aircraft are very far behind 5th generation aircraft. Ironically the west (just EU + USA) have over 5000 air-to-air capable aircraft (400 of which are 5th generation), while Russia has a bit more than 1000.
I'm not sure about Egypt buying the MiG-35, but I do know they bought 50 Kamov Ka-52's, 16 Ka-52K's, and dozens of Ka-27PL's, Ka-27PS's, and Ak-630 Gattling Gun's for their Mistal Class Ships. EDIT: It's true, confirmed that 50 are on order from Egypt worth $2 Billion and Pre-Payed, with the first 2 already delivered.
india ko sukhoi 35 lena chahia jiske bare ma pata ha k kamyab ha agar ek engine vala lena chahte ha uska kia fiada usi kimat ma hame takda or powerful fighter mil raha ha sab se badi bat ha hamare paas sukhoi 30 ha hame pata ha iske bare ma ye la le bahut badia rahega
***Wars launched by the U.S and NATO: Guatamala, Cuba, Vietnam, The Congo, Nicaragua, Iraq, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and the list goes on! Shouldn't countries that claim to oppose war avoid starting wars in the first place? Shouldn't countries who claim to advocate peace refrain from undermining peace?
Didn't see it do anything a Hornet or a Viper can't do with a good pilot. Or a Typhoon or Rafale or Gripen for that matter. This thing in a one on one with a Raptor... game over.
That USA things is irrelevant becous i am Finnish. What the hell you think that Ukrainians would do if they country is attacked? If you want to live under russian rule live in russia dont anaxate other countrys to your rule. And why are countrys like estonia, lithuania, latvija, ukraine, poland in nato and we finnish and swedish are joining it becous only ho would attack all these countrys is Russia and islam.
Jerry Keränen First of, don't say "you". I'm not involved in this and live in America. But think about it, I'll even include a Finnish example. Crimea's population is 2 million, and 1.7 million wanted to be part of Russia (95% as the statistic said). You're going to tell 95% of the population to move to Russia, and leave that land to only 300,000 people? So you think in terms of land, instead of in terms of people. Borders are drawn, and a lot of them are drawn wrong because of historical reasons. Crimea was part of Ukraine for only 23 years. In a recent poll, even 73% of Ukrainian's said "let Russia keep Crimea, its theirs and always has been", about 5% abstained from voting, and the rest that votes "Crimea should be returned to Ukraine" were mostly from areas of Ivano-Frankivsk and Lviv, so mainly hardcore Ukrainian Nationalists. May I remind you, that mentalities of people in Lviv, and mentalities of people in Crimea, are like 2 different countries (no pun intended). Eastern Ukraine and Western Ukraine were never a "United Ukraine". My country was always separated by the 2 mentalities, and that can even be seen in the elections of presidential, regional, and local elections before 2014. Here are the maps of it, which will give you an idea of mentalities of Ukraine over the past 23 years: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Ukraine Picture this situation about Finland. During the Soviet-Finnish War, the Soviets took from Finland the Gulf of Finland islands, Karelian Isthmus, Ladoga Karelia, Salla, Rybachy Peninsula, Hanko, Petsamo, and Porkkala. After the collapse of the USSR, every single one of those territories except for Porkkala was given back to Finland. So should all the Finnish people that lived there for hundreds of years "Move to Finland to where they want to live"? or will they adapt on the land that they lived their entire lives on and their previous generations? The Finns in Porkkala, which today is Pechengsky District of Murmansk oblast, Russia, they still maintain their Finn culture, but live under the Russian flag. If they would suddenly want to vote to be back to Finland and hold a referendum, and 95% would vote to be with Finland, you would say that's illegal? Now let's say that Russian Extremists are threatening the Civilians and Residents of Pechengsky, and the people are begging for the Finnish Army to come and protect them, you would say that those actions are illegal? I'm speaking of a hypothetical situation of course, but it's something for you to think about. Would you support your countries efforts to protect the Finnish population on territory that's now Russian but was Finnish for hundreds of years before, or would the current owner have all rights of the land, which by your logic, includes the people...
Land that where lost to russia in ww2 fights are russian now if people there would like to join Finland it would be illegal in my eyes and russia would have right to defend it own land.
No dog fighting. ..No Top Gun,Guss when I hit dem brakes. ...what is Maverick gona do now!You can se only few miles in a air show,so they dance...patriotism is not about jello! !!!
+Gieselle Luke F-14 Tomcat has Swept Wings. I personally see no resemblance to this. Mig-23 resembles the F-14, which also has swept-wing design. But Mig-23's first flight was in 1967, and F-14's first flight was in 1970.
sukhoi35 bhi acha ha rusia se india k link bhi ache ha tejas ka ingine bhi rusia se lena chahia mig35 ka ingine tejas ma lag jae to tejas ki speed 2.5 mach ho jae gi china bhi chengdu10 ma rusia ka satran ka ingine laga rahe ha hamare link bhi rusia se itne ache ha hum fir bhi auro ke piche bhag rahe ha
People are always talking trash about the Mig fighters. The fighter jet is only as good as the pilot's skill and talent in my opinion. The Russians trained the Vietnamese's pilots, and the Vietnamese were very effective against the Americans. I guess the bad rep comes from the shitty pilots like the Arabs. Not only that, the Arabs didn't have any AWACS giving them the advantage of targeting enemy fighters first. In my opinion, I believe Russian Mig-29SMT, Mig-31, and Mig-35 pilots can go toe to toe with F-15s, F-16s, F-18s. Fighter jets are just tools like a rifle, and it's really the pilots' skill and talent that speaks for itself. We know Russian pilots are welled trained, and they trained the Vietnamese well. The Vietnamese shocked the Americans so bad that the Americans started up the Top Gun training program after the Vietnamese pilots of the NVA embarrassed them. The Vietnamese pilots got their skills from the Russians too
I believe the conclusion will be made in Spring. I think India would be more interested in a license instead, considering that they have a lot of Joint Ventures with Russia, including about the PAK FA (FGFA) and BrahMos 1 and BrahMos 2. India is going to start locally producing T-90S tanks, and is also a large buyer of US Aerial Weapons as well. This is not to rule out as of yet that India will not be using MiG-35's in the future.
Very good demo of the Russian 35's. NATO could have done better in acknowledging the 35s in Russia as well. War baby war! Peace comes from war, war doesn't come from peace.
People take peace for granted. It is a real thing and if it is not take care properly it can be lost, then we have chaos. To stop the chaos we need war in some cases.
lets look at the MiG-35 versus real 4++ planes the 4++ gen planes carry advanced targeting pod the MIG-35 OLS-K compared to Damocles , Sniper and Litening is garbage The payload of MiG-35 is 7000 kg, Super Hornet carries 7.7,EF carries 9 , the Rafale 9.5 lastly, 4++ planes have 5th gen abilities like sensor fusion, advanced data links and advanced defensive systems nothing like that is on the MIg-35
Comparing some Characteristics such as hardpoints and payload take-off weight isn't what gives a Plus to a plane. You mentioned payload, but what about speed? Rafale and Super Hornet is Mach 1.8 Max, MiG-35 is 2.25. MiG-35 is the only other plane that has Double Thrust Vectoring, while the F-22 has Single Thrust Vectoring. The MiG-35 in terms of Datalinks has a large mainframe computer on the ground just as an Su-35S and T-50. Composite Materials and Classified Coating is what provides slight Stealth Features, but do you also think that all Characteristics, in and outs, will be released on its debut? Such as its ECM tech? If a plane can engage 8 targets simultaneously, you can expect it to have advanced ECM. I hope you don't get the Characteristics info from Wikipedia, as those have been proved to be highly inaccurate, most notably the Su-24.
what about speed ? speed is only one part of the equation. its not called double thrust vectoring?? the F-22 has 2D -2 dimensions pitch and roll. The MIG-35 uses 3D like Su-35 and T-50 for enhanced maneuverability. 3D downside is that greatly reduces that plane departure resistance( control of the plane) secondly ,the MIG-35 does not have computer similar to Su-35 or T-50. The MiG-35s ability to carry weapons is far lower than the Su-35s. you blame Mikoyan for not bothering to intergrate more weapons hence why India passed on it at MRCA Stealth reduction features only reduce its signature not hide it. a plane can engage 8 targets simultaneously, you can expect it to have advanced ECM actually no the F-14 AWG-9 radar allowed it simultaneously 6 targets at time and that was state of art 1980s, the MiG-31 could also engage 6 targets a time. mutli target capability is nothing new look at the Su-35S and far far better than MIG-35 and more an actually 4++ plane
The Zhuk radar is the worst POS created since existence and my heart stops that it is put in a mig-35 better not be on mig-41!!!! Zhuk is max range 200km with RCS of 5 Irbis is max range 400km with RCS of 3. Mig 41 better have byelka or something more greater than that.
+thomas h ginski This may surprise you, but the F-14 Tomcat was copied from a Soviet MiG-23 Design. The F-117 technology was implemented by combining a captured MiG-25 Technology with an F-16 at Groomlake Airfield. Also, there's no shame in reverse-engineering. It's normal part of technological improvements. The USSR built a shuttle known as the Buran, and was 1.5x better in capabilities than the US Shuttles. The US copied designs of Soviet "Mir" Space Station for their Space Station "Freedom" concept. Eventually, both concepts were combined to create today's ISS (International Space Station). The US in Operation Paperclip captured and transferred a lot of German Scientists for Ballistic Technologies. NASA was led by an Ex-Nazi Scientist. Jet Technology also originally came from Nazi Germany, and the F-86 Sabre and MiG-15 were both reverse-engineered from the Messerschmit Me-262. And you cannot deny that the US B-2 Stealth Bomber has many characteristics from the Nazi German Stealth Bomber Horton Ho-229. In conclusion, everybody reverse-engineered, and improved upon technology. And also, directional missile capabilities? The Su-35S 4++ Fighter can lock on 10 targets simulatenously and fire at them at the same time. Combined with FCS Network Netcentric Warfare Technologies, all weaponry is guided in multi-spectrum. I think you just need to study aircraft more.
Join our Discord for ADDITIONAL and INSTANTENEOUS SOURCES that get past through CENSORSHIP along with Discussions with people all over the world regarding the issue of the Ukraine War & Military Tech Talk: discord.gg/UyHTF47f7T
Full Specifications in Description!
Be sure to check out my Review, Specifications, and Analysis of the 3 Latest Tanks showcased at International Army Forums from Russia, Poland, and the US (Proryv-3, PT-16, & Griffin): ua-cam.com/video/En64n3a_dA8/v-deo.html
This aircraft looks like a real dogfighter, but the F35 has advanced electronic capabilities. It can send out tweets and Facebook comments in battle. It even wins air wars on UA-cam. It is so advancd that the pilot can insert a further quarter (Million bucks) so that the pilot gets an extra three lives.
That's 50 million bucks extra. It's like BMW whereby you don't get extras, you just unlock technology already paid for, for a premium.
+Irishandtired what's the point in BMW m...radar picks it up and a cop gives you a ticket. ...but Honda,just blends in...no ticket!!!
+Irishandtired BMW is a lot better than anything out of Russia, a lot, like infinitely better.
Kascio GG Indeed :)
Haha....awesome
The Mighty MIG is Back
the best figther in this class.
Russia has the best fighter jets and President in the world.
+madmanjshum Putin is a theif just like most all pollititon's. NATO will destroy Russian troop's if they f**** around much more in Europe. As the airborn say ' we will put your face in the mud'.
+Steve R Enough of all these hate talks already. Have a great day
Steve R, in case of real war with Russia it's more likely that NATO will break up cause none of those countries want to be nuked for irresponsable US federal goverment's policy. Shit, I wouldn't be surprised even if almost every state of the US would declare independence from Washington in that case.
Is Long Range Jet Best Of World
Russians are expert in making of Fighter aircrafts. Respect from India 🇮🇳
I love fighter jets, no matter from which country they are! My favorites are the F16>F22>SU and Migs!!
nice and this only there 4++ gen fighter I read somewhere that talks have begun to develop a lightweight 5th gen fighter called MIG lmfs
Yeah, that's true. In fact, Mig-35 has some parts that are gonna be in the Mig corporation's 5th generation fighter. In the same way like Su-35 has many parts that went into 5th generation heavy jet fighter T-50 Pak Fa.
Thank you for the translation for the 3:40 Video! Very interesting!
Thank you for uploading this excellent compilation! I have just added video
from today's official introduction into manufacturing of MiG-35 (full
version, 30+ mins) to my channel for all MiG fans!
It's un upgrade Mig 29 why did they changed it to Mig 35?
Perfect jet fighter MIG-35D
Bravo...Rusian Army.....
Maybe
SU-35 @ MIG-39
Next Gen , Focus On
Heavy Duty Double Fiels
Boost Long Rangers
Because You Don't Have Carried out of The Sea World.
Stealth Mode must Be.
Night Version
Calculation Hard Ware System..
Subject To Sprotection Land Traget In One Second Marking FiveMore Target, This Is Heavy Duty Needed Proof that.
Is Pavel Beliakov still there in the design bureau?
Thanks for the English subs! MiG-35 looks to be a very potent and deadly aircraft.
Perfect for export as well, Iran should order 50 on license production immediately!
Iran is more in need of Sukhoi 30 or 35, Migs are made for naval forces and smaller countries demands.
Lets just say smaller and economical solution.
Vuk Srb Mig-35s would be ideal for short range missions where the larger Su-35 is an overkill. Ideal for patrolling vast russian territory though.
is it moc 2 plus speed
I can't wait for a model airplane kit to come out. Hopefully in 1/72 scale.
The acrobatics are dazzling , so the MIG lives on . Just be careful not to release all the specifications , the Americans would love a copy to replace their F-35 , now used as a tank , because it couldn't fly .
+Richard Martin LOL this fighter would have its weapon lock warnings blaring before it even knew it was in a fight going up against a F22
William J Greklek III
Where is this F-22 , if it flew in Syria , the US ordered that their planes avoid contact with the Russians ? For what reason ? All in the records .
+Richard Martin so that dont get their ass handed to them
Arhbition R1
Exactly as computed .
You think that is dazzling??? Yeah maybe 50 years ago!! What kind of drugs are all you people on?? I want some!!
I feel like su-35 is a power demonstration fighter jet and MIG is a working horse
Dude, what do you think about dalek14 videos, btw? I think they are quiet biased.
I did an interview with an Abrams Tanker named Strizhi who has recently started talking (and teaching) the people behind the C.A.B show, which includes dalek. What I stressed to him before, but finally confirmed by someone actually from the field, is that he claimed in his T-90A Vs. M1A2 Abrams Tank Video he claims that, and I quote, "under intense conditions, the Abrams loader can get in 15 shots per minute if necessary", which is completely false information. The problem with them is that they don't have hand-on experience with the Tanks or Jets they talk about, they only have on the paper reports.
The other time was when Dalek was claiming about the TOW-2A that shot the T-90 tank in Syria, that "had it been a TOW-2B, the T-90 would've been fully destroyed", to which I said "there's Kontakt-5 bricks on top of the turret as well" and "Syrian Opposition do posses TOW-2B and more". I linked him a PBS Documentary that shows Syrian Opposition showing a BGM-71E-3B TOW, to which he claimed "That is just the serial number", clearly not watching the PBS Documentary since it's said in the documentary "the Serial number has been scratched off".
According to Abrams Tanker Strizhi after talking to Dalek and the CAB people, they apparently thought that a MiG-21 was a 3rd Generation Plane. Strizhi volunteers in an Air Museum (and his mother was a Military Pilot) and gave them a virtual tour of the museum, showing Daleks and CAB's misconceptions about many of the technology that they were "refuting".
It's Daleks and CABs show that has actually inspired me to make the T-84 Oplot-M Vs. T-90AM Comparison Video, which is 90% complete and will be uploaded soon. They are biased not for the sake of biased, but just lack information and refuse to review some because of being fanboys of the tech they prefer, while lacking first hand experience in any of their fields.
It seems to me, it is just a Murican fanboy channel, that simple.
Btw, this guy, who you used to interview, does he have any channel by any chance? If yes, could you send me the link please?
Ivan Alexeevich He has a UA-cam username with uploads no more in the dozen of Re-Uploads, but sure:
- Our Interview (part 1 of 2): ua-cam.com/video/PB_0jHgJgWQ/v-deo.html
- Strizhi's Account: ua-cam.com/users/strizhi
He told me he's from St. Petersburg, but he doesn't even speak Russian. He's pure American. Was adopted in one of those International Russian Adoptions which were common in the 90's.
Ukraine War Awareness Thanks, man! =)
It's awesome that with all this information, we're not being told much
People still dont know how good this aircraft is
i love how they dont explain what anything actually is
+Based af The Chinies ripped of there last desing they got their thieving little hand's on !
The MAKS Demonstration is nice! All this generation labeling is BS.Just because it has less stealth, it's a 4++, like the Su-35S, but both are the only 2 planes with double thrust-vector plane or direction, which 5th Generation planes can't even pull off. Maybe a third plus sign should be added to MiG-35 and Su-35?
Shit, Son.. this is barely a step up from a 1970's Tomcat (google it)
+Motor City As I recall, MiG-23 came before the F-14 Tomcat, the Aircraft's that introduced Sweep-Wing Variable Geometry. How the hell are you classifying F-14 with a MiG-29 (which doesn't have Sweep-Wing)? Do you know Aviation? What's next? What would your response be if I'd say "Shit, the F-35B is barely a step up from the Yak-141". Hah!
I'm not talking about which aircraft came first, I'm talking about the better of the two airframes because you cant compare this old school Mig to anything the US has rolled out with since the 1980's, which is where this Mig belongs. It does look cool but it's just so outdated.The F-14 which is a war-time deadly-beast, multiple role dogfighter and time tested for over 20 years.. or this Russian prototype that can only do circles in the air for an airshow, one time. I doubt it can even go mach without, as you might understand "shaking the stick out of your hand". Is the airframe on this even strong enough to launch & land from a carrier? Oh wait, you only have helicopter carriers.. so the world will never know. I was a US Navy fighter pilot for 12 years and some of the Russian comments on here are so misinformed it actually made me laugh (thank you)! It takes much more than a dozen kids in a huge hanger acting like they are working on a part of a toy mock-up. It takes a huge infrastructure of thousands of people, test pilots, wind tunnel testing, avionics and that's not even counting power plant or weapons systems to build, deploy and sustain any new aircraft, let alone a military fighter jet.I understand you are all proud of your country, as you should be. Russia has done some great things in it's past and I get it. But when you go around bashing my country, The United States with what I can only call "Horseshit Information" that you are spoon-fed by the Kremlin, that's when I stop laughing and start typing.One more thing, before you kids start talking more about dropping atomic bombs on the United States you should think twice.. who will you steal technology from after we are gone? China? Be careful, we may be the only friends you still have once China turns their sights north..
You are seriously overrating American aircraft. S-400 would shoot any number of them out of the sky simultaneously. We already know for a fact that Russian radar has no problem spotting f-22.
Ryan Alt ....actually....you have no facts!! Shoot one down than. That's the ONLY fact you will get. Here's a fact.....Russians s300s aren't what they claimed either....hence the quick upgrade to s400 and now working on s500?? Hmmmm.....sounds like an issue??
seems to be a nice air craft
regards from India to Russia !!
Very good Fighter for Indian Air force on MMRCA 2.0 deal, I wish our country India will select this jet . Love you Mother Russia. Keep going with new experiment. Good luck
From The AK-47 AK-74 Kalashnikov To AK-176 & S-400 are all proven state of the art technology. There's no flimsiness in Russian language!
Don't know much about the new MiG-35, But the Su-35 is (The World's) most low maintenance and agile aircraft with extremely aggressive weaponry and avionics.
The Russians are not car nor bike makers. They have always aimed on high technological mega-projects instead, thus they're far ahead than some very overconfident nations.
A MiG with stealth cool.
Superb ! MIG-35SM
Joining to the SUKHOI Stars and upcoming 6/7 gen.
is it suffering the vibration the american tomcat had with its shortness and its ubrupt virtical stabillizer fins being simular in design lowering them and making them more fish alike may help and would also lengthen its main body adding the ability to carry larger weapons as well.and the shortened arrow head delema with its wings and tail being close proximity unto one another and nothing to provide and man made thust plate at its rear alike an ionic breeze divice of which sweeps and cleans its tail exhaust and if its power is amplified it may cool its exhaust as well of which would help cloak the war bird from modern devices.
*I love it. I simply fucking love it...!!!*
R WARRIOR yet you are on every Russian chanel, what are you a Masochist! ?
This is so much better than F-35.
Very nice jet, cheerrssssssss
What ever happened to the PAK FA?
+Xiones11 they are still going to make those it just they might need more time but this gives them extra money handy to buy more 4th generation fighters like su 35 mig 35 etc
+Xiones11 developement of advanced radar systems that make full stealth aircrafts not worth their money.
the Pak-fa is reserved for NATO guys! and is much much better than this! je je
They can't afford it.
+Xiones11 Program had been canceled because of too high requirements for Russian possibilities.
Oh please! What they built like 3 of these?
3 prototypes and pre-serial production series started recently, first will probably roll out from that series in 2017.
Beautiful
grande Rusia unos cuántos mig 35 para Perú
esta avion me encanta ojala el ejercito de mi pais contara con este tipo de tecnica aerea
it can play FM radio while flying.
Pakistan air force should consider mig 35 seriously it's amazing
.ıts. Perfect aırcraft .russıa endustry did built Hıgh gualıty eguptment .congralatıon .
This Mig-35 I believe could outfly them all. It would be close between the Eurofighter, Rafale, F-22, and MiG-35 but I think the MiG is a little more agile imo. All great planes though.
Top 💪😏👌, die MIG 35 ist euch sehr gut gelungen. Spitzen Kampfjet 🧐👍......
most people think dogfight dogfight time is over actually it's the opposite with the countermeasures at the end of the day it is the dog fight and the skill of the pilot and the plane
You speak true you speak true sir!
Impressive new Russian Fighter MIG 35. I feel that our new JSF35 will be outclassed by the MIG35??
you might get a few of us but we will get all of you
Can a stinger shoot it down?
Can it support ground operations, as in Syria, from a low altitude, how durable the frame is against .50cal machine guns?
Comparing with "old" Su-25, what are the improvements, after all the alias is "Fulcrum" i.e. 'support', in what ways MiG-35 is better in close-ground support than the "old" one?
- Prolly not, considering modern ECM, that's like asking if an Igla can shoot down a Raptor (doesn't matter if it's stealth or not, an eye lock-on is an eye lock-on). Or if a TOW can pass through Shtora-1 or Konkurs pass Trophy APS. Old Generation Missiles don't work with 21st Century ECM.
- Yes. And not only is the frame durable from 12x99mm bullets, but it has 2 engines. So if one is knocked down by a "Stinger" missile, the second engine will bring the aircraft back home. Just a Note: All those Video's in Syria of slow flying Aircraft being shot up by AA on a Technical Toyota Trick "Jihadmobile" are fake and from the game ARMA II.
- You're comparing the wrong aircraft. The MiG-29 was an Su-27 Competitor. So the MiG-35 should be compared with the Su-35S. The advantage of both of these planes over any planes, including Western 5th Gen Aircraft, is "Double Thrust Vectoring". Otherwise, much is still classified since it's in Prototype Phase. Like I said, most comparable Aircraft would be the Su-35S, so I assume by your name that you speak Russian so here's a "Declassified" documentary about it (ua-cam.com/video/Rot_r6a8W8Y/v-deo.html).
- BONUS: The "old" Su-25 is getting an upgrade to the Su-25M3. But still, different type of aircraft. The M3 will have more precise precision for unguided weaponry and Glonass and Navstar GPS.. The 35's Aircraft's are meant more of Guided and even FCS-N (Future Combat System Network) for Netcentric Warfare.
Did you just ask if a stinger can shoot down a fucking air superiority mach 1+ fighter? No... Stinger can hardly shoot down attack aircraft or any MANPADS for that matter. They can't target any aircraft going above 670km/h because the missile will run out of energy and anything above 2300m is just untouchable except helicopters armed without IR flares.
*****
Mmm nah, there were a few incidents in 1980s Afghanistan where 1 engine of an Su-25 was hit by a Stinger, but the Aircraft was able to return to base because of its second engine. 2 months ago in Syria were shot down a SAF MiG-23 and an SAF Su-22 by MANPADS, probably an old Igla System.
Ukraine War Awareness
Still, MANPADS are useless against the Russian fast mover force that operates in Syria right now.
For specific ground operation are versatile Su 34, Mig 35 is fighter and will be used also on aircraft carrier.
cool
I really wish the Phil. air force could acquire some of this awesome fighter jets.
nice
can this be fitted with israeli avionics?
Yes, almost every vehicle can be replaced with Foreign Parts. Israel is changing parts of their F-35A's to a new variant, called F-35I for example. Some Ukrainian T-64 Tanks use sights customized from Germany, and so on. However, Russia at its current progress wouldn't want Foreign Parts in their Tech because they were able to Domesticize nearly everything and is now "Made in Russia", weapons and armor of all categories. So to answer your question, it can, but they won't.
MiG-35 looks like a great Russian fighter, it appears smaller and reminds me of the European fighters, small is good characteristic to have.
Su 30 mki have 3D thrust vectoring capability.
this could not haul water for a F-15, how many you got 2?
Which F15? C, A, E, SE... F15 on itself means shit. And this is new product, prototype series and zero production series are in existence. Latter one being atm under construction.
F35...air elevator!But it's stealthiest elevator in the World!
Long time ago indonesia used to use old MIG, but now it is replaced by SU 27, SU 30 and soon will launch SU 35. Maybe we need this MIG 35 in order to strengthen Indonesia's Air Force......Hail Russian. Каждая эскадрилья..............Индонезии и России дружбу с момента обретения независимости Индонезии
most effective
A 4+++ fighter, The new F-18 Super Hornet.
RUSSIA BEST
Many people in the West fainted from fear. Also many have died from heart attack.
Because Russia is so incredibly strong.
M¡g-35đ 💪💪💪💪💪👌✊
I think India might opt for this jet Although, PAF also has requirements ...for such a platform. Lets see..
Well the jet is just a little bit powerfull than US counterparts or eurofighter, but it's 2,5 times cheaper. Russian military equipment is extremely both military and economically effective.
Not really. Those aircraft are very far behind 5th generation aircraft. Ironically the west (just EU + USA) have over 5000 air-to-air capable aircraft (400 of which are 5th generation), while Russia has a bit more than 1000.
Cuánto cuesta ???
Egypt buy 50 mig 35
Russia planes are cheap, maybe Egypt will bring to Red Flag.
I'm not sure about Egypt buying the MiG-35, but I do know they bought 50 Kamov Ka-52's, 16 Ka-52K's, and dozens of Ka-27PL's, Ka-27PS's, and Ak-630 Gattling Gun's for their Mistal Class Ships.
EDIT: It's true, confirmed that 50 are on order from Egypt worth $2 Billion and Pre-Payed, with the first 2 already delivered.
يا رجل انت مخك كبير مالقيت غير الميخ ٣٥ قول ميج ١٧ ميج ٢١ ميج ٢٣ معقولة بس ٣٥ روسيا ماباعت منها ولا حبة ونزلتها للجيش الروسي ٢٠١٤ خليك صاحي شوي
Omar Mohamed - muslims countries don't have there Technology and weapons muslims missile
india ko sukhoi 35 lena chahia jiske bare ma pata ha k kamyab ha agar ek engine vala lena chahte ha uska kia fiada usi kimat ma hame takda or powerful fighter mil raha ha sab se badi bat ha hamare paas sukhoi 30 ha hame pata ha iske bare ma ye la le bahut badia rahega
🇷🇺💪🇷🇺💪🇷🇺💪🌟
They combined TIE FIGHTER and X-WING Technology...
Show offs...
***Wars launched by the U.S and NATO: Guatamala, Cuba, Vietnam, The Congo, Nicaragua, Iraq, Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria and the list goes on! Shouldn't countries that claim to oppose war avoid starting wars in the first place? Shouldn't countries who claim to advocate peace refrain from undermining peace?
I think it looks like a beefed up cross between an F-14 and F-18. That tail has to go.
OHhh this might be able to beat a typhoon in a dog fight.
+Xiones11
in my opinion it will depend on the pilot's skill and who will catch their opponent first on their radar
Didn't see it do anything a Hornet or a Viper can't do with a good pilot. Or a Typhoon or Rafale or Gripen for that matter. This thing in a one on one with a Raptor... game over.
I hope it's better than any US made aircraft
+Nigel Maund You should to comapre technical specs this aircraft to F-16 e.g. to get back into reality ... ; )
excellent for Russia, I like the way they uses this planes .hope they stop nato doing bad to other countries, viva Russia 💪👍👊
+Jose Gutierrez What bad has nato done? Did nato attack Ukraine and took crimea to them? Has nato attacked geaorgia?
That USA things is irrelevant becous i am Finnish. What the hell you think that Ukrainians would do if they country is attacked? If you want to live under russian rule live in russia dont anaxate other countrys to your rule. And why are countrys like estonia, lithuania, latvija, ukraine, poland in nato and we finnish and swedish are joining it becous only ho would attack all these countrys is Russia and islam.
Jerry Keränen
First of, don't say "you". I'm not involved in this and live in America. But think about it, I'll even include a Finnish example. Crimea's population is 2 million, and 1.7 million wanted to be part of Russia (95% as the statistic said). You're going to tell 95% of the population to move to Russia, and leave that land to only 300,000 people? So you think in terms of land, instead of in terms of people. Borders are drawn, and a lot of them are drawn wrong because of historical reasons. Crimea was part of Ukraine for only 23 years. In a recent poll, even 73% of Ukrainian's said "let Russia keep Crimea, its theirs and always has been", about 5% abstained from voting, and the rest that votes "Crimea should be returned to Ukraine" were mostly from areas of Ivano-Frankivsk and Lviv, so mainly hardcore Ukrainian Nationalists. May I remind you, that mentalities of people in Lviv, and mentalities of people in Crimea, are like 2 different countries (no pun intended). Eastern Ukraine and Western Ukraine were never a "United Ukraine". My country was always separated by the 2 mentalities, and that can even be seen in the elections of presidential, regional, and local elections before 2014. Here are the maps of it, which will give you an idea of mentalities of Ukraine over the past 23 years: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_in_Ukraine
Picture this situation about Finland. During the Soviet-Finnish War, the Soviets took from Finland the Gulf of Finland islands, Karelian Isthmus, Ladoga Karelia, Salla, Rybachy Peninsula, Hanko, Petsamo, and Porkkala. After the collapse of the USSR, every single one of those territories except for Porkkala was given back to Finland. So should all the Finnish people that lived there for hundreds of years "Move to Finland to where they want to live"? or will they adapt on the land that they lived their entire lives on and their previous generations? The Finns in Porkkala, which today is Pechengsky District of Murmansk oblast, Russia, they still maintain their Finn culture, but live under the Russian flag. If they would suddenly want to vote to be back to Finland and hold a referendum, and 95% would vote to be with Finland, you would say that's illegal? Now let's say that Russian Extremists are threatening the Civilians and Residents of Pechengsky, and the people are begging for the Finnish Army to come and protect them, you would say that those actions are illegal? I'm speaking of a hypothetical situation of course, but it's something for you to think about. Would you support your countries efforts to protect the Finnish population on territory that's now Russian but was Finnish for hundreds of years before, or would the current owner have all rights of the land, which by your logic, includes the people...
Land that where lost to russia in ww2 fights are russian now if people there would like to join Finland it would be illegal in my eyes and russia would have right to defend it own land.
MiG 29 = T-34 : MiG 35 = T-34-85 Same difference
American aircarft only advertise and expensive see in Syria which is better
Shyam Sunder you nat. ander stand Nathing in syria
No dog fighting. ..No Top Gun,Guss when I hit dem brakes. ...what is Maverick gona do now!You can se only few miles in a air show,so they dance...patriotism is not about jello! !!!
mig return . vote for mig 35 . F-22 raptor not enough to stop mig 35 for rampage .
what a tanker to lol ? i love this Russian jets men
Why does this look like a knock-off from the f-14 Tomcat we where flying in the 70's ?
+Gieselle Luke F-14 Tomcat has Swept Wings. I personally see no resemblance to this. Mig-23 resembles the F-14, which also has swept-wing design. But Mig-23's first flight was in 1967, and F-14's first flight was in 1970.
+Ukraine War Awareness
I feel your pain... a lot of ignorance in some of these comments.
Can beat F-22 ?
And my question is retoric.
Yeah!
still spews like a turbo charged diesel truck
+Nick Baker Ha! Jealous much. Your country's jets come nowhere near the MiG jets 29 thru 35.
Actually aviation fuel is not very far from diesel.
+Gareth Wilkin they are all shit because one birdstrike can take any of them down.
Beer Me Birdstrike can take down any aircraft, do you even know how turbofans work?
Russian Makes Good Fighter jets-
sukhoi35 bhi acha ha rusia se india k link bhi ache ha tejas ka ingine bhi rusia se lena chahia mig35 ka ingine tejas ma lag jae to tejas ki speed 2.5 mach ho jae gi china bhi chengdu10 ma rusia ka satran ka ingine laga rahe ha hamare link bhi rusia se itne ache ha hum fir bhi auro ke piche bhag rahe ha
People are always talking trash about the Mig fighters. The fighter jet is only as good as the pilot's skill and talent in my opinion. The Russians trained the Vietnamese's pilots, and the Vietnamese were very effective against the Americans. I guess the bad rep comes from the shitty pilots like the Arabs. Not only that, the Arabs didn't have any AWACS giving them the advantage of targeting enemy fighters first. In my opinion, I believe Russian Mig-29SMT, Mig-31, and Mig-35 pilots can go toe to toe with F-15s, F-16s, F-18s. Fighter jets are just tools like a rifle, and it's really the pilots' skill and talent that speaks for itself. We know Russian pilots are welled trained, and they trained the Vietnamese well. The Vietnamese shocked the Americans so bad that the Americans started up the Top Gun training program after the Vietnamese pilots of the NVA embarrassed them. The Vietnamese pilots got their skills from the Russians too
nobody desvers war,somelike it
India refused to buy these planes! Why?
I believe the conclusion will be made in Spring. I think India would be more interested in a license instead, considering that they have a lot of Joint Ventures with Russia, including about the PAK FA (FGFA) and BrahMos 1 and BrahMos 2. India is going to start locally producing T-90S tanks, and is also a large buyer of US Aerial Weapons as well. This is not to rule out as of yet that India will not be using MiG-35's in the future.
Russia should never cooperate with the stinky back stabbers India
Very good demo of the Russian 35's. NATO could have done better in acknowledging the 35s in Russia as well. War baby war! Peace comes from war, war doesn't come from peace.
+mitarmat
peace comes from Peace
WAR = DESTRUCTION
PEACE
People take peace for granted. It is a real thing and if it is not take care properly it can be lost, then we have chaos. To stop the chaos we need war in some cases.
The United States of America should build vectored thrust F-16 and F-15X!🤔😇🤫
lets look at the MiG-35 versus real 4++ planes
the 4++ gen planes carry advanced targeting pod the MIG-35 OLS-K compared to Damocles , Sniper and Litening is garbage
The payload of MiG-35 is 7000 kg, Super Hornet carries 7.7,EF carries 9 , the Rafale 9.5
lastly, 4++ planes have 5th gen abilities like sensor fusion, advanced data links and advanced defensive systems
nothing like that is on the MIg-35
Comparing some Characteristics such as hardpoints and payload take-off weight isn't what gives a Plus to a plane. You mentioned payload, but what about speed? Rafale and Super Hornet is Mach 1.8 Max, MiG-35 is 2.25.
MiG-35 is the only other plane that has Double Thrust Vectoring, while the F-22 has Single Thrust Vectoring.
The MiG-35 in terms of Datalinks has a large mainframe computer on the ground just as an Su-35S and T-50. Composite Materials and Classified Coating is what provides slight Stealth Features, but do you also think that all Characteristics, in and outs, will be released on its debut? Such as its ECM tech? If a plane can engage 8 targets simultaneously, you can expect it to have advanced ECM. I hope you don't get the Characteristics info from Wikipedia, as those have been proved to be highly inaccurate, most notably the Su-24.
what about speed ? speed is only one part of the equation. its not called double thrust vectoring??
the F-22 has 2D -2 dimensions pitch and roll. The MIG-35 uses 3D like Su-35 and T-50 for enhanced maneuverability. 3D downside is that greatly reduces that plane departure resistance( control of the plane)
secondly ,the MIG-35 does not have computer similar to Su-35 or T-50. The MiG-35s ability to carry weapons is far lower than the Su-35s. you blame Mikoyan for not bothering to intergrate more weapons
hence why India passed on it at MRCA
Stealth reduction features only reduce its signature not hide it.
a plane can engage 8 targets simultaneously, you can expect it to have advanced ECM
actually no
the F-14 AWG-9 radar allowed it simultaneously 6 targets at time and that was state of art 1980s, the MiG-31 could also engage 6 targets a time.
mutli target capability is nothing new
look at the Su-35S and far far better than MIG-35 and more an actually 4++ plane
Here is an easy one, compare the MIG-35s OLS-K to an Sniper XR pod,
The Zhuk radar is the worst POS created since existence and my heart stops that it is put in a mig-35 better not be on mig-41!!!! Zhuk is max range 200km with RCS of 5 Irbis is max range 400km with RCS of 3. Mig 41 better have byelka or something more greater than that.
TheNomadicGrammarNazi Shit a grammar Nazi ;(
You cant put IRBIS is MiG-35 ffs. Size of modules, their number and power consumption required differs greatly between them.
I prefer the su 35
This video made the top ten list : www.thetopten.ca/opinion/top-10-fighter-jets-in-the-world-of-2016/
actually it look like ak 47 ! anybody can handle it
ploos ploos.
Ojalas El presidente de Peru Ollanta los aquiera antes de terminar su gobierno 2016 por lo menos media docena...
y peru de donde compra esos aviones criatura?
y para que los quieren?
The F 22
F-22 and F-35 shit.
nothing more than U.S. copies - without the avionic & directional missile capabilities of NATO.
+thomas h ginski This may surprise you, but the F-14 Tomcat was copied from a Soviet MiG-23 Design. The F-117 technology was implemented by combining a captured MiG-25 Technology with an F-16 at Groomlake Airfield.
Also, there's no shame in reverse-engineering. It's normal part of technological improvements. The USSR built a shuttle known as the Buran, and was 1.5x better in capabilities than the US Shuttles. The US copied designs of Soviet "Mir" Space Station for their Space Station "Freedom" concept. Eventually, both concepts were combined to create today's ISS (International Space Station). The US in Operation Paperclip captured and transferred a lot of German Scientists for Ballistic Technologies. NASA was led by an Ex-Nazi Scientist. Jet Technology also originally came from Nazi Germany, and the F-86 Sabre and MiG-15 were both reverse-engineered from the Messerschmit Me-262. And you cannot deny that the US B-2 Stealth Bomber has many characteristics from the Nazi German Stealth Bomber Horton Ho-229.
In conclusion, everybody reverse-engineered, and improved upon technology. And also, directional missile capabilities? The Su-35S 4++ Fighter can lock on 10 targets simulatenously and fire at them at the same time. Combined with FCS Network Netcentric Warfare Technologies, all weaponry is guided in multi-spectrum.
I think you just need to study aircraft more.