Research philosophies are so complicated in books. But in real life they are so easy to understand. According to Prof. Stevenson in Cambridge university, He told us "Do not waste your time in reading millions of books in research methodologies, just read PhDs and top journal papers". And he is right; Ontology is a sophisticated concept. But I want to know how can I use it in my research. That is why I am trying to simplify as much as I can to be relevant to our research objectives.
It is so helpful, so clearly differentiated and explained! I am trying to approach my master thesis for a long time and this one video clarified so many things. Brilliant! Thanks a lot!
I am doing my dissertation for masters in project management and was really struggling to put this together but with Amgad's videos I think I can see light at the end of the tunnel. Thank you a million. This video and others were so helpful to me.
Mate this is great. I'm a researcher and analyst and have been trying to think of a way to present methodology with regard to questions of what we can know and where certain methods may be appropriate. Really great stuff and much appreciate.
I've ordered my Research Paper at essay.hjo0.all-about.in. Completed an awesome paper and ahead of time too!!! *The writer did an excellent and perfect job!*
I missed an online class on epistemology due to some tech issues and decided to hook up here to fill the gap; guess what? I learnt a lot even more than what I would have learnt from my online class. Thanks for sharing.
Well done, Sir. I really appreciate. You not only elucidated the philosophical concepts and approaches in a very easy-to-understand way but also induced my deep interest to learn more. Thank you, indeed.
شرح حضرتك أكثر من رائع ماشاء الله تبارك الله ربنا يبارك في حضرتك ويجزيك خير ، حاولت اقرأ كتب وافهم الاشياء دي وفيديوهات اخري ، لكن ماشاء الله اعطلك الله موهبة توصيل المعلومة بسهولة ويسر
Superb distinction, differences are now concrete in my mind, l m now able to remind my research advisor which track we are on...The problem solving track and not the empiricist track. I certainly will cite your valuable insight. Thank you.
Hi Dr Amgad, if in interpretivist research LR is not important "at all" according to you, how do you develop research aims & objectives? As in, if you are not adding to any knowledge, why would you do a PhD? Without extensive LR, you cannot have research gaps identified. Without the gap, what will you be studying and with what RQ will you have? I am confused by the paradigms.
As a Chinese student, I feel the explanation is more accepting than many English native teachers produce, though I listened to a lot of times to grab the accents; however, it worths. Huge thanks.
This is REALLY helpful. I was really confused about the relationship between those terms and now you have painted a very clear picture. This is so much better than what my university does. The more I read the text they provide, the more confused I became. Thank you very much :D
Hi Amgad Badewi .. im a MSc student and id like to thank you for your video my friend .. it helped me understand and successfully pass my Advanced Methods of Enquiry subject :) Cheers
Dear Amgad, Alssalamu Alicum. I am unable to thanks you about this interesting topic. thank you very much indeed. It is really clear, understood and helpful. All the best, Jazak Allah khair
Salam Alikum, My Brother Ahmed introduced me to your video series. They are incredible. Unfortunately, I am now in the final year of my PhD and very close to submission. I wish I would have watched these YEARS ago. Coverage is very in-depth, but is at a pace that's purely accessible. After watching these videos, I am almost ashamed to call myself a PhD student. Thank you so much for your time and effort. PEACE!
Thank you Jonavan Barnes for your trust. I'd like to clarify an important principle of research methodology science. There is no clear cut right and wrong. As long as the logic used is logical and helpful, it could help you to create knowledge. What I am trying to do is to find out how good PhDs are conducted then I took the similarities to build my knowledge. I went through many books and papers in RM to understand the underpinning philosophies of these PhDs. Simply, this is my RM to present my ideas :) Shad Sylla
Positive research means "testing a theory research". It is used mainly if you have an idea in your mind and you want to test what you hypothis. It could using qualitative inquiry such as interview or quantitative form such as questionnaire. But positive approach believes that the reality is not existed in the minds of people nor the research. What we do in positive research is to try to test relationships (test propositions) in order to validate the idea (The theory).
Thanks for the forecast! I need some advice: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (air carpet target dish off jeans toilet sweet piano spoil fruit essay). How can I transfer them to Binance?
I am into qualitative research my friend, but it is just so mind blowing to listen to your lectures. And I am amazed how you make difficult concepts so easy to understand.
Asalamu Aleykum Brother. Alhamdulillah for having you. i have seen one of your video lecture on introduction part. it seems very help full would give the link to full lecture or would you mail me? Jazakom Allah Khairan too
Very clear explanations which have assisted me immensely. Thank you. However I can't agree that you can only fill a knowledge gap using quantitative research. Nor do I agree that the literature review is less important for qualitative studies.
May be there is a misunderstanding. In positive research, literature review has two functions: identification of knowledge gap and development of theoritical framework. In contrast, in interpretive research, literature review is conducted to identify knowledge gap and keeps you know what is happen around you. This different orientation toward "the function of literature review" makes literature review is a critical part in positive research and is a less critical part in interpretive one
You are just best sir, it's comprehensible enough and am so happy to learn here because its hard to meet the lecturers on campus and my studies are only in my second language of which am not literate in
Very good explained! Do you have another video where the research does not follow the traditional approach following on the Positivism or the Interpretism all the way? Meaning a mix method where the elements of them are combined?
Javier Fajardo The next session will be how to write literature review in each paradigm. It will be followed by modern research paradigms (Mixed methods- mixed paradigm - mixed methodology)
Thank you really. I am planning for the next session. Do you prefer the new session about Quantitative Research with examples from Papers, Qualitative Research with examples from papers, or Mixed Research with examples from papers?
Hello, There is something unclear to me. According to Robert Cox, problem-solving theories are the "positivists" ones. How do you explain your argument Thanx.
Awesome work!!! :) Thanks so much for making this! I just started my research methods course and felt so lost initially and this helped a lot. You rock!
Dear Amgad, great work ! Your explanations are very lucid and they spur an interest in me to delve deeper into the topic. Please keep up the good work. Best wishes.
Subjectivism is the contrary to Objectivism. That is way, it is traditionally considered as a dimension of Qualitative Research (Interpretive Paradigm). Because you interpret the reality from your background and from your observations. In contrast, Objectivism, the researcher is out of the research and he should not intervene the results. Researcher uses the objective techniques to analyse the data (statistics)
Assalaam U Alaikum brother Eid Mubarak It was an immense pleasure to discover and learn from you. May Almighty brings more happiness and blessings in all what you are doing to the community.
If you need one to one help, I charge 40 GBP per hour offer one-to-one help and 2 GBP for reading each page. I do not write (no writing service) to anyone. I just offer counseling. I can help in research methodology, literature review, and analysis. Furthermore, I offer regular meeting with PhD and master students to follow up with them If you are interested please contact me. Skype: amgad_1985
Sir here I am really having economical problem. You can't believe that how I struggled to get admission for M.Phil, P.hd. I brought up in one orphaage home (SOS Children's village). I heard that if you share your knowldge without any term and condition then it would expand you more with dignity. SO please consider me as exceptional case.
Amgad Badewi Hello there, I have enjoyed your videos and thank you for the help. If you were to write a paper on the inpact of drones (uavs) on the land surveying industry this would be an objective approach ? collecting data on time and man power for example. Would I need to do interviews and questionaires or just analysis existing data? if you could give me your quick thoughts on this, i would sincery be greatful. Sam
Thank you so much for the lecture videos. Ive been having a hard time reading and understanding my research methodology class notes. This is really simplified and easy to understand. Great job.
thank you for your video, could you please tell me what are differences between 'characteristic' and ' defintion', how to put ; characteristics in our writing is important?
I have always considered that there are only two problems in philosophy; the big one, episte, and ethics. I have never had a clue what metaphysics was. Now I know. There is no such thing. Remnants of Plato's theory of forms (an ancient view of the world), the mind/body problem (might have been a problem with Hobbs and Descartes but it is the discipline of neorologists today rather than a philosophical problem) and causality (already solved by Hume). As you point out it is just the book that follows Aristotle's book on physics but has no new material problems. Kant also considered that there were only two problems; episte and ethics. What he termed pure and practical reason and he made a massive contribution to solving both. Both problems have now been solved. Popper has solved the episte problem and law making is not done by reference to Bentham or Kant but by parliament (with debate and scrutiny, consultation with stakeholders, first and second readings, ammendments and second chamber review). I am a big champion of discipline (every other enquiry is a discipline) as in going forward and standing on the shoulders of giants and seeing further. When someone mentions empiricism, rationalism, analytical, continental, ontology, existentialism, phenominology, posivitism and any number or other evolutionary dead-ends I want to scream. Its a discipline stupid. We stand on the shoulders of giants and see further. If others think it is OK to mention seventeenth century empiricism then should we also include animism as a valid here and now talking point. No we should not. We go forward.
Great explanation of such a difficult topic area. I also note that your lecture is an excellent example of learning through variation - Variation Theory of Learning, by Ferrence Marton- where concepts cannot be understood until contrasted with others. thank you.
Great class. I´m preparing my class to introduction to psychological research and your notes are precise- thanks :) Greetings from Peru and Australia :)
Thank you sir for the great explanation about research philosophy. How about if the research is doing in multi method design? Which ontodology & epistemology suitable can be use to explain about research philosophy?
I want to do research on kangaroo care promotes bonding and I choose two groups one who does kangaroo care and other group who doesn't, what sampling method is this also I put both of the group in to same test with same intervention giving equal opportunity to see the differences they have while putting them in same test what is the research design and what is sampling method here. Thank you
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Research philosophies are so complicated in books. But in real life they are so easy to understand. According to Prof. Stevenson in Cambridge university, He told us "Do not waste your time in reading millions of books in research methodologies, just read PhDs and top journal papers". And he is right; Ontology is a sophisticated concept. But I want to know how can I use it in my research. That is why I am trying to simplify as much as I can to be relevant to our research objectives.
Amgad Badewi دكتور هل يمكن ترسل لي بريدك الالكتروني حتى اتمكن من مراسلتك؟
sir kindly refer only one book or few papers to understand the concept of these paradigms
In one sentence "get to the point" loved your way of explaining it's simple and very productive for me .thankyou so much sir.
You are most welcome
I could not imagine the better way of explaining complex constructs in such an easy way. Thank you very much!
I am very happy to know that. Thanks a lot
This video is great. I wish I could like it a thousand times. Thanks for sharing.
It is so helpful, so clearly differentiated and explained!
I am trying to approach my master thesis for a long time and this one video clarified so many things. Brilliant! Thanks a lot!
Thank you for this! I was so confused about all the terminology, but after this explanation it is a lot clearer.
I am doing my dissertation for masters in project management and was really struggling to put this together but with Amgad's videos I think I can see light at the end of the tunnel. Thank you a million. This video and others were so helpful to me.
Mate this is great. I'm a researcher and analyst and have been trying to think of a way to present methodology with regard to questions of what we can know and where certain methods may be appropriate. Really great stuff and much appreciate.
Thank you very much I was lost in definitions, you explained everything using simple examples and cleared everything up !
Thank you so much. I am very pleased to know that.
I need someone to write my Research Paper. Please recommend *paper writing service*
I've ordered my Research Paper at essay.hjo0.all-about.in. Completed an awesome paper and ahead of time too!!! *The writer did an excellent and perfect job!*
that is so wrong
reach me please...
Great, very clear. You're an excellent teacher.
Thanks a lot Ian :)
An Educator by heart! Clear, concise and accurate! Thank you from #Jamaica
حضرتك مثال رائع للمسلم بالتزامك بدينك ، وبعلمك ماشاء الله .بارك الله فيك يارب
I missed an online class on epistemology due to some tech issues and decided to hook up here to fill the gap; guess what? I learnt a lot even more than what I would have learnt from my online class. Thanks for sharing.
great. I studied all day long but couldn't understand but your videos taught me all that i wanted
Well done, Sir. I really appreciate. You not only elucidated the philosophical concepts and approaches in a very easy-to-understand way but also induced my deep interest to learn more. Thank you, indeed.
شرح حضرتك أكثر من رائع ماشاء الله تبارك الله
ربنا يبارك في حضرتك ويجزيك خير ، حاولت اقرأ كتب وافهم الاشياء دي وفيديوهات اخري ، لكن ماشاء الله اعطلك الله موهبة توصيل المعلومة بسهولة ويسر
Thank you from Kenya! This has really simplified the sophisticated PhD research jargons. May Allah bless you!
Awesome. Thank you for explaining so simply what I have been struggling to understand for 6 months!
Superb distinction, differences are now concrete in my mind, l m now able to remind my research advisor which track we are on...The problem solving track and not the empiricist track. I certainly will cite your valuable insight. Thank you.
Very well explained. I could not understand this anywhere else, but you made it easy. Thank you.
Hi Dr Amgad, if in interpretivist research LR is not important "at all" according to you, how do you develop research aims & objectives? As in, if you are not adding to any knowledge, why would you do a PhD? Without extensive LR, you cannot have research gaps identified. Without the gap, what will you be studying and with what RQ will you have? I am confused by the paradigms.
Very talented teacher. You are amazing and teach in a very simple and well organized way.
Thank you
As a Chinese student, I feel the explanation is more accepting than many English native teachers produce, though I listened to a lot of times to grab the accents; however, it worths. Huge thanks.
these terms have been confusing, but you helped me to understand them without much hustle. A huge big thank you.
Stuart Katwikirize Thank you very much
This is REALLY helpful. I was really confused about the relationship between those terms and now you have painted a very clear picture. This is so much better than what my university does. The more I read the text they provide, the more confused I became. Thank you very much :D
Never comment of UA-cam but found this so useful and clear to what can sometimes seem like a difficult topic.
I hope you liked it, Cheers :)
God bless you! I was struggling with this.
Amazing!
Hi Amgad Badewi .. im a MSc student and id like to thank you for your video my friend .. it helped me understand and successfully pass my Advanced Methods of Enquiry subject :) Cheers
I am really pleased to know that :)
Great lesson, well explained. Love the enthusiasm.
What an outstanding presentation. Thank you!
Fantastic! I finally understand it all. Thank you so much for clear and concise explanations
Dear Amgad,
Alssalamu Alicum. I am unable to thanks you about this interesting topic. thank you very much indeed. It is really clear, understood and helpful.
All the best,
Jazak Allah khair
Salam Alikum,
My Brother Ahmed introduced me to your video series. They are incredible. Unfortunately, I am now in the final year of my PhD and very close to submission. I wish I would have watched these YEARS ago. Coverage is very in-depth, but is at a pace that's purely accessible. After watching these videos, I am almost ashamed to call myself a PhD student. Thank you so much for your time and effort.
PEACE!
Jonavan Barnes Amazing words. Thank you very much.
Is every thing that he's saying acurate? Because it doesn't seem that way. I'm not an expert or anything but somethings seem off
Yes... it is.
Thank you Jonavan Barnes for your trust. I'd like to clarify an important principle of research methodology science. There is no clear cut right and wrong. As long as the logic used is logical and helpful, it could help you to create knowledge. What I am trying to do is to find out how good PhDs are conducted then I took the similarities to build my knowledge. I went through many books and papers in RM to understand the underpinning philosophies of these PhDs. Simply, this is my RM to present my ideas :) Shad Sylla
It is very helpful and great resource. Thanks for it brother Amgad Bedewi
I am finding these presentations very useful in breaking down the concepts to process my own research. Thank you.
Hello Amgad, you are very good, you made Research easy for me. Thanks
Positive research means "testing a theory research". It is used mainly if you have an idea in your mind and you want to test what you hypothis. It could using qualitative inquiry such as interview or quantitative form such as questionnaire. But positive approach believes that the reality is not existed in the minds of people nor the research. What we do in positive research is to try to test relationships (test propositions) in order to validate the idea (The theory).
Thanks for the forecast! I need some advice: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (air carpet target dish off jeans toilet sweet piano spoil fruit essay). How can I transfer them to Binance?
I am into qualitative research my friend, but it is just so mind blowing to listen to your lectures. And I am amazed how you make difficult concepts so easy to understand.
All the thoughts are organized. Thank you so much for this clear explanation!
This is really handy. Thanks very much. proud of you, brother. Jazaak Allah Khair
I am really pleased to hear that from you. Jazakom Allah Khairan too
Asalamu Aleykum Brother. Alhamdulillah for having you. i have seen one of your video lecture on introduction part. it seems very help full would give the link to full lecture or would you mail me? Jazakom Allah Khairan too
Salamul'Lah alaikum. This is an excellent illuminating piece. jazakhal'Lah Khairan
Very clear explanations which have assisted me immensely. Thank you. However I can't agree that you can only fill a knowledge gap using quantitative research. Nor do I agree that the literature review is less important for qualitative studies.
May be there is a misunderstanding. In positive research, literature review has two functions: identification of knowledge gap and development of theoritical framework. In contrast, in interpretive research, literature review is conducted to identify knowledge gap and keeps you know what is happen around you. This different orientation toward "the function of literature review" makes literature review is a critical part in positive research and is a less critical part in interpretive one
Thank thank. This is a wonderful resource. So simple to understand for my students.
This is so clear. I have now subscribed to your channel. Thank you and God bless you!
Awesome! Thank you!
Easy. Well presented. Thank you. Saved me tons of boring pages.
Thank you so much for your great , clear , attention catching and building lecture. Really you build me. Sisay from Ethiopia, Africa.
You are just best sir, it's comprehensible enough and am so happy to learn here because its hard to meet the lecturers on campus and my studies are only in my second language of which am not literate in
Amgad you're a boss. helped me big time with my qualitative research report.
Thank You very very much! You explained it in a simple way, loved it!
God Bless You!!
الله يجعلها في موازين حسناتك
Thank you so much. I hope you watch my other videos also :)
Research and God HMMMMM
Very good explained! Do you have another video where the research does not follow the traditional approach following on the Positivism or the Interpretism all the way? Meaning a mix method where the elements of them are combined?
Javier Fajardo The next session will be how to write literature review in each paradigm. It will be followed by modern research paradigms (Mixed methods- mixed paradigm - mixed methodology)
Thank you really. I am planning for the next session. Do you prefer the new session about Quantitative Research with examples from Papers, Qualitative Research with examples from papers, or Mixed Research with examples from papers?
all
Hello,
There is something unclear to me.
According to Robert Cox, problem-solving theories are the "positivists" ones.
How do you explain your argument
Thanx.
Thanks a lot for your quality information for PhD students Great Works ...
You're awesome. Thank you very much for breaking down these complex concepts. Bless you
Awesome work!!! :) Thanks so much for making this! I just started my research methods course and felt so lost initially and this helped a lot. You rock!
Made stuff that sounded very difficult simple, thank you so much
You're very welcome!
the lecture is very good simple and well presented...
thank you Sir. Keep it & go ahead..............
Me from Nepal. ( County of Lord Buddha)
Excellent explanation. very detailed yet logically explained for practical use. Thank you so much!
Dear Amgad, great work !
Your explanations are very lucid and they spur an interest in me to delve deeper into the topic.
Please keep up the good work. Best wishes.
بارك الله فيك و جزاك خيراً
Thank You
Can you add the links to the video before and after this , to watch all as a cohesive unit. Thanks
Subjectivism is the contrary to Objectivism. That is way, it is traditionally considered as a dimension of Qualitative Research (Interpretive Paradigm). Because you interpret the reality from your background and from your observations. In contrast, Objectivism, the researcher is out of the research and he should not intervene the results. Researcher uses the objective techniques to analyse the data (statistics)
Thank you so much... now everything is clear, you really explain everything perfectly!!! Thank you!!!
Thanks a lot Vera. This is very kind of you
يعطيك العافية تسلم على مجهودك مفيد جداً بطريقة سهلة وبسيطة
Baraka allah fikom, best of works that I had never seen before thanks
Tomorrow i have a test about research methods, after seeing this i finally have the feeling I'll pass. Thank you very much Sir.
I am very happy for knowing that. please I am waiting your scores which I am sure it will be perfect :)
Assalaam U Alaikum brother
Eid Mubarak
It was an immense pleasure to discover and learn from you. May Almighty brings more happiness and blessings in all what you are doing to the community.
If you need one to one help,
I charge 40 GBP per hour offer one-to-one help and 2 GBP for reading each page. I do not write (no writing service) to anyone. I just offer counseling.
I can help in research methodology, literature review, and analysis.
Furthermore, I offer regular meeting with PhD and master students to follow up with them
If you are interested please contact me.
Skype: amgad_1985
Thank you sir, I need your help to understand it in application so please give me your mail ID through which I can send you my question
Sir here I am really having economical problem. You can't believe that how I struggled to get admission for M.Phil, P.hd. I brought up in one orphaage home (SOS Children's village). I heard that if you share your knowldge without any term and condition then it would expand you more with dignity. SO please consider me as exceptional case.
Amgad Badewi Hello there, I have enjoyed your videos and thank you for the help. If you were to write a paper on the inpact of drones (uavs) on the land surveying industry this would be an objective approach ? collecting data on time and man power for example. Would I need to do interviews and questionaires or just analysis existing data? if you could give me your quick thoughts on this, i would sincery be greatful. Sam
hiii...how can i contact u ?
Where are the rest of lectures?
What about axiology? Is this just the question of values? The value of the research?
That was great, you have actually explained research so i can understand it a 'little' better lol
Cheers! keep up the good work
Mark Quinton if you need any further explanation, do not hesitate to ask.
Very good my brather , excellent .
Very clear and obvious .
I am proud of my beard. I do as prophets do, at least in my face :)
اذا كنت صح يهمك بلدك والباحثين العرب كنت شرحت بالعربي. لكن انت همك الشهرة والاجانب 😢
proud of being muslim and my aim is to help others when they need me
May Allah reward you for it.
سندريلا ooo الحلقات للطلبة اللي بيعملوا دكتوراة بالانجليزي
الدكتور شرحه اكثر من رائع ماشاء الله تبارك الله
I don't see a beard on your profile pic though
Thank you so much for the lecture videos. Ive been having a hard time reading and understanding my research methodology class notes. This is really simplified and easy to understand. Great job.
Great job Akhi, keep up the good work. The Muslim nation needs researchers and academicians like who are part of the solution not probelm.
Very clear explanation, helped me to organize my thoughts. Thanks!
Thank you :) I wish you can watch my last video ( Research Question, Methodology, and paradigm)
I subscribed and plan to watch more of your video. Thanks!
On my channel. Literature review playlist
thank you for your video, could you please tell me what are differences between 'characteristic' and ' defintion', how to put ; characteristics in our writing is important?
I have always considered that there are only two problems in
philosophy; the big one, episte, and ethics. I have never had a clue
what metaphysics was. Now I know. There is no such thing. Remnants of
Plato's theory of forms (an ancient view of the world), the mind/body
problem (might have been a problem with Hobbs and Descartes but it is
the discipline of neorologists today rather than a philosophical
problem) and causality (already solved by Hume). As you point out it
is just the book that follows Aristotle's book on physics but has no
new material problems.
Kant also considered that there were only two problems; episte and
ethics. What he termed pure and practical reason and he made a massive
contribution to solving both.
Both problems have now been solved. Popper has solved the episte
problem and law making is not done by reference to Bentham or Kant but
by parliament (with debate and scrutiny, consultation with
stakeholders, first and second readings, ammendments and second
chamber review).
I am a big champion of discipline (every other enquiry is a
discipline) as in going forward and standing on the shoulders of
giants and seeing further. When someone mentions empiricism,
rationalism, analytical, continental, ontology, existentialism,
phenominology, posivitism and any number or other evolutionary
dead-ends I want to scream. Its a discipline stupid. We stand on the
shoulders of giants and see further. If others think it is OK to
mention seventeenth century empiricism then should we also include
animism as a valid here and now talking point. No we should not. We go
forward.
Great explanation of such a difficult topic area. I also note that your lecture is an excellent example of learning through variation - Variation Theory of Learning, by Ferrence Marton- where concepts cannot be understood until contrasted with others. thank you.
You are an excellent teacher! God bless you always.
Thank you, it is my pleasure to know that :)
That is super helpful. Thank you. جزاك الله كل خير
Great class. I´m preparing my class to introduction to psychological research and your notes are precise- thanks :) Greetings from Peru and Australia :)
Excellent way of conveying message-Allah subhana Talah Bless you peace and rehma
That was awesome, Amgad. Thanks very much.
Do u have a handout on that please?
please present a comparison between media centred theories and audience centered theories as soon as possible.I'll be very grateful.
Thank you sir for the great explanation about research philosophy. How about if the research is doing in multi method design? Which ontodology & epistemology suitable can be use to explain about research philosophy?
I want to do research on kangaroo care promotes bonding and I choose two groups one who does kangaroo care and other group who doesn't, what sampling method is this also I put both of the group in to same test with same intervention giving equal opportunity to see the differences they have while putting them in same test what is the research design and what is sampling method here.
Thank you
God bless you brother, you really enlighten our minds in a time we badly need to such information in order to conduct a PhD research.
Thanks for your comments. I hope it is useful
Which is the first part to this?
g8 lecture sir.....you have explained such difficult to understand terms in a simple way....
Thank, i have learnt so much .Your presentation is superb!
Hi, i like the video very much; are you planning a video on different types of research methods both quantitative and qunaititive ?
Great suggestion! I am delivering now online courses! You can register from here
ibisresearch.co.uk/
Wow the terminology you explained are on point. Thanks so much.
Thank you, very helpful...need ro watch over n over to really remember. Thank you for this video sir..