Sony 35mm f1.4 GM VS Sigma 35mm f1.2 DG DN VS Sigma 35mm f1.4 DG DN

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 лип 2024
  • Tony rambles on about comparing 3 different 35mm lenses on Sony E mount.
    Consider becoming a patron!
    / tonydae
    Join us on Discord!
    / discord
    Chapters:
    00:00 - Introduction
    01:34 - Sigma 35mm f1.4 DG DN
    02:15 - Sigma 35mm f1.4 DG DN Samples
    04:07 - Sigma 35mm f1.2 DG DN
    06:18 - Sigma 35mm f1.2 DG DN Samples
    07:43 - Sigma 35mm f1.2 DG DN Focus Issues
    11:45 - Sony 35mm f1.4 GM
    12:35 - Sony 35mm f1.4 GM Samples
    14:57 - General Comparison Summary
    16:07 - Wrap Up

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @MagnetiqLabs
    @MagnetiqLabs Рік тому

    Thank you for this important info about the AF issue on Sigma!

  • @Symptomix
    @Symptomix 10 місяців тому +1

    thank you for this detailed review. i am basically on the same track as you are, having owned the sigma 35 1.4 and returned it, now owning the 35 1.2 but to be honest, the slower or less reliable AF annoys me even in photography. I will sell it and get the GM.

  • @johansphoto
    @johansphoto Рік тому +2

    I did not have any issues with the af on the 35 f1.2 it is one of my most reliable lenses. But I definitely have an issue with the weight...

    • @TonyDae
      @TonyDae  Рік тому

      If you didn't use the AF the way I show in this video then you won't see the issue. Also the manual focus is gaaaarbaaaage

  • @sidvicious3129
    @sidvicious3129 Рік тому +1

    Darn it, darn it, darn it, I wish I would have found your channel sooner because. I ordered the Sigma 35mm f1.2. I have other GM glass and I cheaper out, but I will see and I actually own a A7IV, so the focus breathing wouldn't have been an issue on the Sony 35mm 1.4GM.
    I'm a hybrid shooter and I ordered this lens, three days ago. I bought a used copy for $776.38, including shipping and 753 without. In very good condition.
    My problem is, I thought about this too long and hard because I own the 24mm f1.4gm and I should have just bought the 35mm GM on the Holiday sale.
    It will be a 15 percent return fee. Darn it!!! Great video and I subbed. Ivsaw the video stepping issue in manual focus and its going to drive me nuts!!!

    • @TonyDae
      @TonyDae  Рік тому

      Not a bad price on the sigma but that focus issue made it where I wouldn't buy for any price. Sorry you got here too late :(

  • @kevinbatts2804
    @kevinbatts2804 Рік тому

    Either I'm crazy or YT unsubscribed me. I searched for your page for days because I forgot your name. Glad to be back. : )

    • @TonyDae
      @TonyDae  Рік тому

      Glad to have you back!

  • @wawanbalik
    @wawanbalik Рік тому +1

    Thanks for this comprehensive review. I had already made up my mind about the GM and this review cemented it further.

  • @victormultanen1981
    @victormultanen1981 Рік тому

    cool animation

  • @phtius
    @phtius Рік тому

    Very informative comparison. Have you had a chance to try Sigma 40mm 1.4?

    • @TonyDae
      @TonyDae  Рік тому

      I have not. If they make a DG DN version I may give it a go.

    • @phtius
      @phtius Рік тому

      @@TonyDae BTW, did you check the firmware version on Sigma 35mm f1.2 when testing it?

    • @TonyDae
      @TonyDae  Рік тому

      @@phtius I did, it was up to date. Lens Rentals does a good job of making sure all their gear is up to date and in working order.

  • @pyroBlastM
    @pyroBlastM 4 місяці тому

    So the issue is with video then? How did you find with photo?

    • @TonyDae
      @TonyDae  4 місяці тому

      Image quality is great, favorite of the set. Auto focus isn't as good as the GM but not bad. It's much heavier than the GM and feels like it.

  • @mrwashur1991
    @mrwashur1991 Рік тому +1

    I loved the look of the sigma 1.2 as well, even better than the gm (only in other peoples videos when I was researching which 35mm to get). I could tell the sigma 1.2 was having weird af issues and was pretty slow with focusing compared to the other 2 lenses. Also the weight turned me off. Glad I chose the g master over the sigma 1.2. All the reviews just did basic AF tests and pretty much bs’d the speed even though you could tell the AFC was slower.

  • @theautomationchannel6920
    @theautomationchannel6920 Рік тому

    Very strange to see sigma 24-70 2.8 outperform the sigma prime 35 1.4 @2.8
    I was looking for someone to tell me sigma 35 1.4 is perfect lens so I can spend money for one more prime lens.
    I don’t have 35mm prime
    Only 24 50 85 135
    and 24-70

    • @TonyDae
      @TonyDae  Рік тому +1

      I don't know about the zoom outperforming the prime, but the Sony 35 f1.4 gm is the prime you are looking for. It's quite a good lens.

  • @liyu_cn
    @liyu_cn Рік тому +1

    i think sony 38 1.8 is a good option though i dont decide to buy yet.

    • @TonyDae
      @TonyDae  Рік тому

      It's fine, better focus breathing control than any of the lenses talked about here, but it's not a stunner like the GM is. Serviceable is all I can say about that one.

  • @cameraprepper7938
    @cameraprepper7938 10 місяців тому

    I neither need autofocus, nor do I need aperture 1.2 or 1.4, so I got the excellent Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 35mm 2.0 Aspherical which have outstanding image quality, it is compact and built like a tank !