Here is a question Neil. If the universe is accelerating, does that mean time relatively is speeding up too and we just dont notice it cause we are in the universe.
I love how Chuck's self deprecating humor feigns ignorance but you know he is following every single line of quantum craziness with these intellectual heavy weights
He was originally supposed to be the "average guy". How long does one have to be on a talk show about astrophysics before you are no longer considered "average guy"
He does such an amazing job at making the show more approachable, making viewers feel more comfy with basic concepts being explained to them. I'm certain that by now, he's got a way, way better understanding of science than he lets on.
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever😊
Mike and the your number one , your number one ,, baby space bones voice impersonationist mechanics 👶🎤🙏👶🎤🙏👹🎤🙏🖼️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸👹🎤🙏🎮🌐
If I can go back to my teen years with the knowledge that I have now, I would become an astrophysicist. Ever since I was a kid, I always looked to the skies knowing that one day I will see something extraordinary. Thank god for podcasts. We definitely appreciate you and chuck. Keep feeding us knowledge.
@jotarokujo5132 I think what they are saying is that if their teenage self had known how interesting the subject is, they would have gone to college for astrophysics.
7 місяців тому+12
@@jotarokujo5132so much negativity...ugh lighten up
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever😊
Dr. Tyson. It’s entirely possible that you’re unable to read the thousands of comments on your YT channel. Regardless, please allow me to preface my comments by saying that I have no plan to unsubscribe. I have been following it for years and have taken up quantum physics as a retirement hobby, which admittedly hurts my brain, and very much enjoy your guests on the topic. However, I have to state that your frequent interruptions of your guests are off putting, in particular in this case of Dr. Levin, who is very capable of explaining her profound understanding of her expertise. I’ve read one of her books (so far) and admire her ability to explain very complex issues to a scientific layman. On the other hand, Chuck’s more infrequent “interruptions” are moreso the result of genuine curiosity rather than one-upsmanship. His excitement is palpable and genuine. I hope that you will not take this as an insult to the platform you have created to bring the knowledge of physics to the world. Rather, I hope that you will accept my comment as an honest attempt to more fully add positively to showcase your wonderful guests. For those who follow this channel and are also a fan, please be kind with your rebuttals. ✌️
Heck JC, just don't read the responses if you think they will bother you. I too think you have a valid point. You succinctly brought this point forward in an honest attempt to help EVERYONE here. Not for any only personal preferences or to get any kind of an Atta-boy. I too hope your bringing it forward might can be addressed to help everyone here. Thank you for having the sand to try to help. *Salute*
I don't think anyone who spends time with The Tyson can pass themselves off as "uneducated." With all the years he and Chuck have hung out, The Nice could run his own show if he wanted to! If only Carl Sagan had a comedian to bounce things off of, it would have been the only improvement he may have needed. Who could have been that comedian? For some reason, my mind goes to Buddy Hackett. 😸
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever😊
Please please, when Janna talks dont interrupt her. I dont mind if you do it with others, but it is very distracting when my mind is about to be blown but she gets interrupted.
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever
Wheeler: "Feynman, I know why all electrons have the same charge and the same mass!" Feynman: "Why?" Wheeler: "Because they are all the same electron!" -- From Feynman's Nobel Prize acceptance speech, 1965
Awesome podcast!!! Please have her a regular! So interesting and inspiring to be able to explain such complex concepts in such beautiful and engaging and understandable ways! Ten out of ten!!!
Chuck I got you covered. Had to rewatch with some slight "elevation" and oh my. Janna and some of the things Charles Liu pops off with completely blow my mind. I love it.
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever😊
Neil is my favorite scientist alive .I love him .I always rewatch his podcasts in the JRE show .but the only 1 thing I would change about Neil is how much he interrupts...maybe I hate it so much because i am exactly the same way.love you dr.tyson.
Obviously the human form stretching ability will also change in terms of texture to stretch. Twisting unraveling plasticity after the transformation of it being stretched. Gravity grows and is apart of heat.
She does an absolutely phenomenal job of explaining complex ideas. And even more impressive, she manages to stay coherent and focused through the constant (I mean CONSTANT) interruptions and peripheral inputs Neil offers. I would have loved to hear her complete her thoughts/arguments to completion. I bet she would’ve have developed them even more impressively.
It took me a year to understand the title of Janna's book " A Madman Dreams of Turing Machines " . Janna is a gift , so grateful for all of her remarkable work. ❤from🇨🇦
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever😅
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever😊
That is because its a new revelation in science. This is a break through in science that may or may not be right. It has to be tested and proven just like everything else its a hypothesis that need to be a theory to be proven. But yes this is NEW Science. The revelation you have is no different from the scientist that created the theory within the last 5 years
I love to watch Star Talk, and I find many ideas and theories intriguing. I also love to broaden my view on things. Just one caveat: as a layperson, I would appreciate it if you let your guests first finish their answers and then discuss the subject or make jokes. Both of you interrupt so often that I find it hard to follow the main thought. Also, English is not my first language, which makes it even harder to follow when there are so many interruptions.
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever😊
I love how Chuck is embodiment of everyone of us, who actually didn't knew much about astro physics when this journey was started but over the years with such great communicators and teachers in the show, we all now feel at home now. While it's still a long way to go, but we all are so much more knowledge richer than when we started listening to this wonderful show. I thank you with my warmest heart to all of the team that works to bring us such educational and entertainment rich show.
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever
@ 44:00 Jenna uses the image of a chord to explain the superposition of notes, and went on to explain how the multiverse theory is hard to reconcile with her view. But if I stay with her image of a chord as a superposition of notes, then the chord is of a finite time duration, after which the notes fall back into superposition (if I understood her correctly?). Can one transfer this to an answer to the multiverse existence question, where we in line with quantum theory accept that an observation triggers superposition, and that superposition is equal to a multiverse arising, and that we who observe this chord are part of the same version of that multiverse, but only for the time that superposition is maintained, after which the multiverses collapse. And if one imagines this happening all around us as a continuous series of parallel superposition/collapse, new superposition/collapse, all with different extents in time? Does this mean that one can also imagine that staged events (e.g. Trump's "famous" statement during the election that immigrants eat dogs and cats) manifest in a chord that creates a superposition of our universe, which becomes a new reality until everyone stops observing this chord, after which the alternative version of the universe collapses back? And can one then also say, conversely, that unless it is successful in making all people forget this, that version of the universe will continue to exist?
The last minute or so of the video is what we're all here for and what made Startalk what it is today. Neil, when u talk like that it puts me in a trance. Please give us more of you and your way of communicating in future episodes. I miss when YOU were the focus. Im not trying to discredit anyother person associated with Startalk. But your the true 🌟
General relativity and quantum mechanics will never be combined until we realize that they take place at different moments in time. Because causality has a speed limit(c) every point in space where you observe it from will be the closest to the present moment. When we look out into the universe, we see the past which is made of particles (GR). When we try to look at smaller and smaller sizes and distances, we are actually looking closer and closer to the present moment (QM). The wave property of particles appears when we start looking into the future of that particle. It is a probability wave because the future is probabilistic. Wave function collapse happens when we bring a particle into the present/past. GR is making measurements in the predictable past. QM is trying to make measurements of the probabilistic future
This perspective is very interesting, but it oversimplifies the complexities of unifying GR and QM. It overlooks the spacetime continuum's role, the current theoretical efforts like string theory, and the various interpretations of quantum mechanics beyond the Copenhagen interpretation.
Oh, I like that. I think Roger Penrose would expand on that and say- at great distances when individual particles can have no interaction with any other particle, the scale of space collapses. What was a hot vibrating particle no longer has a reference against which it can be seen to be vibrating - so it becomes totally cold - totally organised.That is the state of Entropy swaps state when scale and relative position can not be measured. I'd like to add - information, the observation of any interaction, the structure of relationships is also scale dependent, like one H2O molecule is not 'water', but two of them may be able to interact AS water. They observe each other.
Doctor Tyson. Some beetle do indeed look up! For just a moment please consider the navigational technique that has been discovered is being employed by the beetle species called Scarabaeus satyrus, aka the common scarab beetle. It apparently orients itself and directs its direction of travel by using the Milky Way Galaxy strewn across the night sky as its visual local map to keep its navigation true. Thank you for the StarTalk show. I have indeed become a fan of you and all of your regularly appearing friends.
The fault of that is more from physicists losing track of what is "reality" and what isn't. Especially the "is math invented or discovered" argument. Math is a language created to DESCRIBE reality. It isn't reality itself. And so the continuation of that is how you have this "quantum wave function", which is just describing probabilities, being treated as reality itself rather than just a description of it. The grass outside is reality. The word "grass" is the description of that reality. The grass is real, the word "grass" isn't.
@@VaeldargThat’s one interpretation but nobody knows yet what the true interpretation is. It could be that the wave function is actually what is there, and the particle only our way of describing it within spacetime accurately. We can’t assume either way.
@@YivvaMedia Interpretations are not created equal, though. Science isn't about perfect explanations, it is about which one gets the closest. And so the further your interpretation is from reality, it means it is worse, not better. "It could be that the wave function is actually what is there..." except it can't. Because it's math written just to describe reality and not reality itself. It's a function describing statistical probability, and reality is under no obligation to go by how you describe what you think it is.
#Question In the TV Series Star Trek Voyager The Borg open a “Trans-Dimensional Rift” which opened a “Gateway” to Species 8472 and when Voyager goes through that Rift they end up in “Fluidic Space” when Space isn’t really Space, it is Matter. So think of Space as we know it Only it isn’t “Space” it is filled with Matter (Think of moving through water like a Submarine) the Submarine is the spaceship and the water is Space. (Keeping in mind the “Multiverse” would something like that possible AND how would Physics work in that Realm?
Interesting question, but I doubt the rules of physics change that much or at all, even in said alternative universe. I think this multiverse theory is more like all the possible futures that spring from choices, like you in another multiverse are a dropout or you don't exist because your parents haven't met because of another choice someone else made. Don't take what I say for the correct answer, but only of what I understood multiverse to be. Or to not make it about people only, because we are not that important, lets say the life didn't evolve on Earth because there were no meteorites, because lets say Jupiter pulled them and formed some Jupiter moon. (just babbling at this point, but lets hope you get what I'm saying)
@@helloukw Yep I get what you are saying. In a Star Trek the Next Generation Episode Data says something along the lines of a Theory that everything that *CAN BE* actually exists (I'm paraphrasing) In essence every choice you make spawns different outcomes in other universes. Example, You are on your way to work and as you get to your car you realize you left your coffee on the kitchen table, do you go back and get it OR decide to get a cup from the Vending machine at work, OR go through the drive through of a Dunkin Donuts? In the Multiverse ALL of those scenarios get played out. If you go back to grab your coffee off the table you are now 1 minutes behind the other two "You's" and being behind by 1 minute means as you are driving through an intersection at the exact moment a drunk driver T-Bones you killing you. The problem with that type of Multiverse is there are 8 Billion people on earth and each person makes a couple of hundred decisions each and every day, SO you would have like 100 Trillion "New Universes" spawning every single day, so it just gets ridiculous to even try and comprehend "The Multiverse" But a Universe that is made up of "Matter" would (I think) have very different physics, I'll explain. In Space we have pockets of Matter (planets,stars,comets,asteroids etc etc) BUT in-between them all is the "Vacuum" of space, basically a "Void" NOW imagine that "Vacuum/Void" is filled with Matter (in the episode they use the term (Fluidic Space) Which is why I did the Submarine moving through the Ocean analogy Now let's say I'm outside and there is a canopy covering the entrance to a building that Canopy blocks the light in it's tracks, BUT now I'm swimming in a swimming pool that is outside I dive down and look up through the water, I can see the light as it is able to move through the water. Now in the vacuum of space light moves at 186k miles per second BUT light moves slower when moving through water as in the vacuum of space nothing impedes it, but water does (not much) but it does take light longer when moving through liquid, SO in a "Fluid Space" everything that moves through space would be interacting with Everything around it. A submarine "Displaces water" as it moves through it so in theory a spaceship moving through "Fluidic Space" would be dispersing "Space" The speed of light would be slower Everything would be interacting with everything within us "Sphere of influence" instead of "Pockets of Mass" in "Normal Space" there would be "Pockets of Void" in Fluidic Space??? I know I'm rambling but I think the physics would NEED to be vastly different just as everything ABOVE the Ocean operates quite differently BELOW the Ocean (Pressure, Atmosphere, Resistance) We have a working understanding of how OUR Universe works, I'm just curious as to how if instead of Vast Vacuums/Voids of Space, we had Small pockets of Vacuums/Voids in Matter. Sorry for such a long post.
The existance of only one electron in the universe that simply runs back anf forth through time can explain a lot. 1) why they the same 2) problems of large numbers: in a universe with a mass of 10^56g approximatly 10^80 electrons and the ratio of the visible universe size to the electrone size exatly 10^40. That is just one layer to go back in time 3) the experiment with two slits is easily explained 4) positrons just electrons moving back in time 5) collision of electron and positron destruction of the loop. Therefore , there are so few of them for the whole structure to work.
This is a great show if it’s Neil and Chuck. As much as I love Neil, whenever there’s a guest, they can’t put their thoughts and arguments across without him constantly interrupting/speaking over them. It’s a shame that I would have loved for Janna to have rambled for an hour without someone talking over her. Anyway cheers.
39:40 f I don't believe that 'many worlds' means separate universes each of whom has its own mass, since it's the continuation of superposition of eigenstates in a particle. A particle of mass m being in two nearby positions at once doesnt mean the region containing both positions suddenly containing 2m.
Neil, I absolutely love u, but please let her finish her train of thought before talking about your conclusions or completing her thoughts. It's challenging for the avarage expectator to follow it. I tend to do the same when it comes to linguistics, though, 'cause it's such an exciting topic XD
For a long time I've been thinking the same thing in mind. It's all started how magnets work. Who gives them magnetic power. Most of the theory I build up in my mind including relativity, gravity, space are inline with this podcast.
Neil. Loved this. One electron?? In a lay-by outside a pub in Wales, resting in a VW camper van after several beers in about 1996 a fellow physicist and I discussed what we called the Lorentzian. You will be very familiar with the square root of 1 minus u squared over c squared. This told our alcohol fueled brains that the photon experienced no time. In other words, ad absurdum, there only needed to be one photon in ALL of the macroscopic universe. I went on to write a program which integrated Dirac's Equation forward in time., and saw some interesting time recursive results in my programming... probably artifacts?? I was offered a studentship by several universities but for personal reasons I thereafter experienced a post graduate teaching degree, followed by an extended a trip to South Africa but I got bored so returned to attend a Masters in Microwave Physics followed by working for a research company in the UK. Meanwhile said mate AJ was working on his PhD at Imperial College with Superconductivity, some of his work had resonance with my research so we collaborated under the radar. AJ got his PhD and shortly after he died... what a great loss. All that aside... The Photon Experiences NO TIME. Discuss.
your measuring is the partical in universe. so wouldn't it not care if its in milky way or Andromeda it scans the reality to see if it is still exists or not. the question is can you send it and it not pop up? that would mean it left the universe which is the first steps to traveling to the multiverse.
34:50 A hyper cube looks awfully a lot like a cube growing in size, so if time was the forth spacial dimension at the last time "axis" value the cube is bigger than it was at the first. I have no idea if any of what I just said is correct. Feel free to correct me, I'm a mathematician not a physicist
Janna Levin, Neil Tyson, Michio Kaku and Brian Greene are my absolute favorite science explainers on the laws of physics and everything about the Universe.
Yeah but dude needs some space to stretch out and move around, he looks mad stiff and uncomfortable cause he doesnt want to be in her space, they gotta move in a bigger space lol or move him to the middle
@@bradheath4200Since you said it first…I usually have a thing for Janna, but she seems to look older for some reason in this episode. Being that she’s so intelligent I find her so attractive but not as much on this one.lol I’ll admit that it’s not “cool” to deduce her down to her looks because she’s so much more than that. But since you mentioned it, I had to share my ignorance. lol
Being a person, thanks to ADD, who has been known to interrupt people when I get interested or excited about a subject, I think NDT gets honestly excited about the topics they discuss. It can be frustrating to listen to but his excitement is definitely contagious and exciting.
My wife and I LOVE you and Star Talk. So much that we have been listening to you after alot at the hospital after giving birth to our beautiful baby boy Oliver. ❤❤👼👼
The Ms, Professor Lady is really good thank you for your help however I think she is a asset to the competition it's a win win /when when She is a Sponsor for Greater good we'll all have fun trust and be blessed
Can you please let J speak ? Why do they have to be so loud and constantly interrupt her. That is zero educated and not sophisticated way of interviewing someone.
Someone said to Einstein, "You have accomplished great things because you stood on the shoulders of Newton." To this Einstein replied, "No. I stood on the shoulders of Maxwell." This is an important distinction. You can still say he stood on the shoulders of Newton, but you should acknowledge that people like James Clerk Maxwell are in between. Einstein credited Maxwell for the basic ideas that led him to the theory of relativity and the famous equation.
Dung beetles use the Milky Way to navigate their poo balls in a straight line at night if i remember correctly. 🌙💩 🌟 So they do look up. Great episode!
Earth isn't separate from the universe. How can we retuen to a place we are already at? That's like living in the state of Ohio and being inside your home and saying you yearn to return to Ohio.
Oh my my !! Yes indeed to everything you shared with us today ! I assumed that the DEEP grief I have been feeling was the "death" of my "ego"... And that is surely partly true ! Yet I was also feeling a Collective "Death" (from the initial Creation of 'Ego'?)... Either way, what a super intense purge and heal that is going on !!!! 💥💞 I slept for 13 hours last night !!! With lots of what my guides called this time ; Cascading Dreams !!! Repetitive small dreams (about a minute long) that were the same dream from many different perspectives !! I think Paul in UK said he experienced something like that a couple of weeks ago. Anyway, it was clearly stated by my Guides that this was really deep complete clearing of an issue, whether my own or Collective, I experienced dozens of views and perspectives on the the same "dream" material ! And I woke up with a MUCH lighter outlook on my Ego issues ! Tho BOY has this been hard !!!! ✌️💞😇
Why debate when Mr Howard can just write papers on his works. Why should he care what NDT thinks when he can submit his work and let all the scientist of the world read and decide for themselves.
45:31 Manyworlds vs many possible states and ocums razor. Manyworlds over ascribes the system, many possible states is a better representation. A splitting would require crazy energy input. Tunable metamaterial for slits as one of the tests and orbital energy levels on the shell. As to the time traveling electron or photon old theories for students. No cherenkov radiation or such.
@22:40 She didn't say space-time is not real -- unless we're experiencing the initial conditions of the universe 'Big Bang' mere moments after it emerges/instantiates/explodes.
This lady says gravity doesn’t fundamentally exist. Terrence Howard said the same thing. Difference between them. One has a degree and one use to be an actor.
@celinesrazor She explains it as existing and not existing with quantum theory. Im not familiar with what Terrance described but he did say many things that many question. If one thinks this about skin color while we are watching 2 folks with the same tone here without questioning either. Neil and this young lady have a reputation as experienced in this field for years. Im not sure if Terrances reputation has reached the level of being reputable. Considering us normal folks arent able to debunk him with our knowledge some see his theory's as true, maybe, i cant prove him wrong or right. However, some seem to have done just that. Yet again im not smart enough to say whos right so we go with, most generally the one that has proven to many as correct. Sorry so long winded here. Takecare
I used to love Neil deGrasse Tyson and this show. But once I found out that he wasn't willing to have this exact type of conversation with Terrence Howard when he reached out to Neil with the new science that he is bringing to light. Like you said Neil, even if you cant agree at the end of the conversation you could have at least agreed that more or better data could resolve the underlying issue. I really think that Terrence Howard has proven himself to be knowledgeable enough to be heard by the scientific community. And it is completely counter intuitive to simply dismiss ideas that are not considered 'mainstream' in the scientific world.
Science has always been based on facts that can be proven to or checked by other peers. At this point it would seem that his theory isnt provable or he hasnt shown it to be proven by people way smarter then us. We basically have to take the judgment of people smarter than us in this field as a conclusion for now. Its very possible that he will get his respect in the future, or he just tarnished his credibility.
One more thought, Terrance is extremely likeable as well as very knowledgeable. However wanting him to be right on the behalf of his likness can mudy anyones judgment. I mean no disrespect here and im also looking at this with less knowledge on of what Terrance speaks than what i can tell you have. Ive only seen a short video of another gentleman debating this with him on the Rogans podcast. At this point, like i said on my previous comment, its basically up to him to continue the work while proving it to be factually scientific. Thanks
Given that large masses create depressions in spacetime, does this imply that there are additional curvatures and interactions in spacetime beyond those depressions, suggesting that our understanding of gravitational pull is incomplete?
In a way, gravity is a product of bending space. Space is a physical medium canvas, that matter is painted in. Because matter affects the shape of space gravity is a byproduct correlation [bending of space] verse causation [graviton]. I dont believe that particle exist. But neither is proven yet. But we have reasons to believe either is a possible answer.
@@orionx79 yeah I agree… but either way you are just stating the scientific consensus, you are not agreeing with Terrence Howard 😂 your comment is just going to confuse the ignorant
You should talk about the hypothetical design of Dyson sphere. The main intent is correct, collect as much of the “free” energy of the star to sustain your civilization. So a Dyson Sphere is one way to image it. But even for an advanced society, too many things would be a waste of resources and surface area to build a sphere. 1. If you wanted the centripetal acceleration to offset the sun’s gravity and create some artificial gravity; you would rotate it. But then only a ring around the inside of its equator would have gravity. Therefore the sphere would have to be constructed strong enough to resist the suns gravity and be built without the aid of rotation. There are just so many challenges that would make it impractical. 2. A Dyson swarm would be more likely. There is just a whole list of reasons why this would make more sense from a resource and methodical approach to collecting a stars energy. It would most likely be built at the smallest diameters to the star with orbits to collect the energy and have the obits that intersect each other be constructed at different orbital distances. Manufacturing and energy collection would happen at the closer orbits while O’Neil cylinders and Niven Ring’s would occupy the Goldilocks obits. Astronomical research and other scientific research would happen at the outer most rings and orbits. The Dyson swarm would make the most logical progression to encompass a star, but you would have to have the system actively correcting itself and avoiding collisions. All stray comets and asteroids would have to be controlled to prevent collisions. Otherwise you would have a Stellar Kessler Syndrome or Dyson Swarm Debris Cascade. Either way, with self replicating AI stellar orbiting modules. Even with our primitive understanding, you could envision turning a star system into a Dyson Swarm. I would NOT recommend a species to convert a habitable system like ours into a Dyson swarm. It would make more sense to turn a nearby red dwarf system into a manufacturing facility using an AI controlled Dyson Swarm.
Theoretical physics is one thing... but utter nonsense from a rambling idiot doesn't feel like StarTalk content. But, maybe if they're doing to do an entire episode on Dunning Kruger.
I am always amazed at the richness of the human mind! There are so many mysteries. I love this channel! New Patron member! We, as a society, need programs and communicators to share current science with us.
Incredible guest. Her terminology and how she uses everyday layman language makes me feel slightly less dumb and it’s cool to catch little bits just based on wording.
45:03 - "I´m the only lucky guy in the multiverse who happens to get heads every the time" / "Yeah, because that would be hard to swallow" - HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Awesome episode. Dr. Tyson is an incredible story teller. He has the ability to make science come alive for his audience. I taught science for 36 years, and I always aspired to generate interest and enthusiasm in my students, to create lifelong learners. 👍
Been watching videos while I clean. All of a sudden had the idea that black holes are potentially objects of such mass they overcome the surface tension of space and become smaller universes, but are maintained in contact through a "pinhole" due to whatever the fabric of space being made of being un-tearable. Thens this video comes up next!
10:17 This is what philosophers set out for debates to be. I think a famous philosopher said that from the debator's point of view you should only think you had a debate if you had the privilege of helping someone else reach enlightenment or the better privilege of being enlightened. These scientists are modern day philosophers
When quarks gluon bond break and they multiply , do they then attach back ? Or stay unbonded ? , and if they bond and you break the gluon bond again do they carry on multiplying ?
What if you do this on scale and then compress all the quarks with the force of universe , do you get matter ? Antimatter ? Atoms ? Could we utilise this for our prosperity ?
Among the loveliest things in this life, and rarely observed, is the genuine laugh of female nerds. It’s fantastic! Fortunately, someone was around to hear it or there would have been no sound.
I'm not a😊 big brain, but I love your conversations. In other words, it's like a child sitting in on the adult conversation. Until later, I will be that child.❤❤❤❤❤👏👏👏👏👏
Did you get your mind-blown during this episode!?
No.
Thanks for watching!
I'm in love
Here is a question Neil. If the universe is accelerating, does that mean time relatively is speeding up too and we just dont notice it cause we are in the universe.
Why is Chuck so sleepy this time?
I love how Chuck's self deprecating humor feigns ignorance but you know he is following every single line of quantum craziness with these intellectual heavy weights
Chuck is a very brilliant guy!!! Don't let the comedy fool you!
Yep he's got a grip on all that stuff that's for sure @@michaelbraum77
Chuck is there to make me feel better cause well… i don’t want to be the only one who is confused😂😂😂
He was originally supposed to be the "average guy".
How long does one have to be on a talk show about astrophysics before you are no longer considered "average guy"
He does such an amazing job at making the show more approachable, making viewers feel more comfy with basic concepts being explained to them. I'm certain that by now, he's got a way, way better understanding of science than he lets on.
Neil explaining continental drifts….
Jenna Levin: mmhmm right…
Neil not being the smartest person in the room is refreshing😂
Guess you haven’t seen him fanboy over other scientists or get corrected,…you’re in for refreshment! Love this show!
It's always great when Janna Levin is on the show. Brilliant Episode!
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever😊
Yowza Janna 🥵
Janna is my #1 favorite guest of all time. She is such a wonderful science communicator and person. I love her chemistry with Neil and Lord Nice
Mike and the your number one , your number one ,, baby space bones voice impersonationist mechanics 👶🎤🙏👶🎤🙏👹🎤🙏🖼️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣💣🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️🏘️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🛰️📸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸🩸👹🎤🙏🎮🌐
Respectable, but I hope it was a hard decision between her, brian Greene, and Michio kaku!
and heather berlin!!!! shes amazing @@Nate-.-
No1 geek Charles liu for me.
It's really messed up when fans can't really ask real questions.
Wish this episode had popped in my feeds sooner. Wow, this panel was amazing!!! Give us more .
Anyone else love listening to this yet understand almost none of it?
There is a hindu book "bhagwat geeta" that book has many things similar to this. Its very simplified physics book.
Testing
Yes it's like listening to someone speaking a different language but understanding their body language and nothing they are saying.
Just watch more videos, read up about it. Make it a hobby to find out and you start to catch on. Eventually you'll be surprised at how much you know
😢
If I can go back to my teen years with the knowledge that I have now, I would become an astrophysicist. Ever since I was a kid, I always looked to the skies knowing that one day I will see something extraordinary. Thank god for podcasts. We definitely appreciate you and chuck. Keep feeding us knowledge.
no you wouldn't. you'd still be terrible at math, which is 95% of the degree.
@jotarokujo5132 I think what they are saying is that if their teenage self had known how interesting the subject is, they would have gone to college for astrophysics.
@@jotarokujo5132so much negativity...ugh lighten up
I would look into astro physics too, maybe in theoretical physics and I am good at math.
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever😊
Dr. Tyson. It’s entirely possible that you’re unable to read the thousands of comments on your YT channel. Regardless, please allow me to preface my comments by saying that I have no plan to unsubscribe. I have been following it for years and have taken up quantum physics as a retirement hobby, which admittedly hurts my brain, and very much enjoy your guests on the topic.
However, I have to state that your frequent interruptions of your guests are off putting, in particular in this case of Dr. Levin, who is very capable of explaining her profound understanding of her expertise. I’ve read one of her books (so far) and admire her ability to explain very complex issues to a scientific layman.
On the other hand, Chuck’s more infrequent “interruptions” are moreso the result of genuine curiosity rather than one-upsmanship. His excitement is palpable and genuine.
I hope that you will not take this as an insult to the platform you have created to bring the knowledge of physics to the world. Rather, I hope that you will accept my comment as an honest attempt to more fully add positively to showcase your wonderful guests.
For those who follow this channel and are also a fan, please be kind with your rebuttals. ✌️
Heck JC, just don't read the responses if you think they will bother you. I too think you have a valid point.
You succinctly brought this point forward in an honest attempt to help EVERYONE here. Not for any only personal preferences or to get any kind of an Atta-boy. I too hope your bringing it forward might can be addressed to help everyone here. Thank you for having the sand to try to help. *Salute*
I think the show is perfect as it is
this is a really odd comment...
I have seen this complaint multiple times before. Often in a less polite manner.
I happen to agree.
Oh, shut up.
I love how Chuck, over the years, seems to be understanding more physics.
Same, it goes to show he isn't just sitting there waiting to make jokes, but rather he is actively engaged and interested in the conversation.
I don't think anyone who spends time with The Tyson can pass themselves off as "uneducated." With all the years he and Chuck have hung out, The Nice could run his own show if he wanted to!
If only Carl Sagan had a comedian to bounce things off of, it would have been the only improvement he may have needed. Who could have been that comedian? For some reason, my mind goes to Buddy Hackett. 😸
@@Mad-BassistWait, George Carlin???
I got that too.
It's called Active Learning.
You need to have a 2 hour show for these 2. I love it when she’s on. I hope you have her on again soon.
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever😊
@@ChargersCitySettle down with your God preaching. This is science, ultimately. It does have a variant of God because God has yet to be disproven.
Please please, when Janna talks dont interrupt her. I dont mind if you do it with others, but it is very distracting when my mind is about to be blown but she gets interrupted.
Neal CANNOT help it.... its physically impossible for him to let someone complete a thought
She is edging you and Neal is ruining it ? Lmao
I need another live Startalk with Janna Levin!
She's been on here 3 times lol
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever
Charles the asian looking professor is also a good guest .
Janna Levin is an absolute fave! I've been following her for years and she never fails to say something that blows my mind.
Wheeler: "Feynman, I know why all electrons have the same charge and the same mass!"
Feynman: "Why?"
Wheeler: "Because they are all the same electron!"
-- From Feynman's Nobel Prize acceptance speech, 1965
Awesome podcast!!! Please have her a regular! So interesting and inspiring to be able to explain such complex concepts in such beautiful and engaging and understandable ways!
Ten out of ten!!!
Chuck I got you covered. Had to rewatch with some slight "elevation" and oh my. Janna and some of the things Charles Liu pops off with completely blow my mind. I love it.
Your're like "Wait I'm levitating right now? Whhhaaatt?"
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever😊
@@ChargersCity What?
Neil is my favorite scientist alive .I love him .I always rewatch his podcasts in the JRE show .but the only 1 thing I would change about Neil is how much he interrupts...maybe I hate it so much because i am exactly the same way.love you dr.tyson.
We see Neil and Chuck: we Click.
We see Janna : We Grab the Popcorn.
Nailed it
Obviously the human form stretching ability will also change in terms of texture to stretch. Twisting unraveling plasticity after the transformation of it being stretched. Gravity grows and is apart of heat.
Totally have a nerd crush on her! She's great.
@@GinaCarmichael-nd2pt
Would you mind rewriting this as a Haiku???
Awe cheers! Now I want popcorn and don’t have any. 😢
She does an absolutely phenomenal job of explaining complex ideas. And even more impressive, she manages to stay coherent and focused through the constant (I mean CONSTANT) interruptions and peripheral inputs Neil offers. I would have loved to hear her complete her thoughts/arguments to completion. I bet she would’ve have developed them even more impressively.
Yeah but if you notice Neil is mostly throwing in science jokes and a lot of “normal” explanations so other non sciencey people would understand
I noticed it too. But I'm glad Neil did it to make understandable as average person.
I think my favorite example of 2 different opinions both being right is the particle/wave nature of light.
It took me a year to understand the title of Janna's book " A Madman Dreams of Turing Machines " . Janna is a gift , so grateful for all of her remarkable work. ❤from🇨🇦
It is a profound juxtaposition that implicitly challenges the nature of reality. After all, in the quantum sense, reality is just a position.
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever😅
🤯
Is this Janna ?
This was by far my favourite StarTalk! So many revelations in my own head. Thank you.
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever😊
That is because its a new revelation in science. This is a break through in science that may or may not be right. It has to be tested and proven just like everything else its a hypothesis that need to be a theory to be proven. But yes this is NEW Science. The revelation you have is no different from the scientist that created the theory within the last 5 years
I love to watch Star Talk, and I find many ideas and theories intriguing. I also love to broaden my view on things. Just one caveat: as a layperson, I would appreciate it if you let your guests first finish their answers and then discuss the subject or make jokes. Both of you interrupt so often that I find it hard to follow the main thought. Also, English is not my first language, which makes it even harder to follow when there are so many interruptions.
I would describe Janna's outlook as "I live the life I love and I love the life I live." How frickin' wonderful!
Great, guess I'm staying awake for another hour then!
Hahah it’s 1:20 am and I was just thinking the same thing right before I read your comment
40 mins if you watch @ 1.5x speed.
(Or in just 1 second @ 2400x speed 😁😁)
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever😊
I love how Chuck is embodiment of everyone of us, who actually didn't knew much about astro physics when this journey was started but over the years with such great communicators and teachers in the show, we all now feel at home now.
While it's still a long way to go, but we all are so much more knowledge richer than when we started listening to this wonderful show.
I thank you with my warmest heart to all of the team that works to bring us such educational and entertainment rich show.
@@ChargersCity What does that even mean?
I would like to ask Neil and Chuck to listen to her instead of interrupting her. We can't follow her thought and explanation up. 🤦♂️
Dis.
It annoys the he'll out of me when guests getting interrupted.
I love the chord analogy - a chord is more than the assembly of individual notes, because of the overtones between those notes.
🙏🙏Blessings forever GOD loves y'all too forever tell everyone you know and don't know. Jesus loves y'all too forever. Teach everyone how to see and enjoy their blessings too forever
@@ChargersCity Too bad none of that is true. Just a cult.
@@ChargersCitywouldn’t you think it’s an insult to call him by his romanized name
Jesus troll!
have a blessed day. Beautiful GOD & Jesus loves you forever
Neil; So....Neutron walks into a bar. Sits down, orders a drink. The bartender brings him his drink and says, "For you, no charge."
Nah. Neutron doesnt think. Doesnt order, its empty
So, a neutrino walks through a bar...
They have a neutral charge tho...
But if it's alone, it can only stay a few minutes
@@jayfredrickson8632 max 10 min apprx.
@ 44:00 Jenna uses the image of a chord to explain the superposition of notes, and went on to explain how the multiverse theory is hard to reconcile with her view. But if I stay with her image of a chord as a superposition of notes, then the chord is of a finite time duration, after which the notes fall back into superposition (if I understood her correctly?). Can one transfer this to an answer to the multiverse existence question, where we in line with quantum theory accept that an observation triggers superposition, and that superposition is equal to a multiverse arising, and that we who observe this chord are part of the same version of that multiverse, but only for the time that superposition is maintained, after which the multiverses collapse.
And if one imagines this happening all around us as a continuous series of parallel superposition/collapse, new superposition/collapse, all with different extents in time?
Does this mean that one can also imagine that staged events (e.g. Trump's "famous" statement during the election that immigrants eat dogs and cats) manifest in a chord that creates a superposition of our universe, which becomes a new reality until everyone stops observing this chord, after which the alternative version of the universe collapses back? And can one then also say, conversely, that unless it is successful in making all people forget this, that version of the universe will continue to exist?
The last minute or so of the video is what we're all here for and what made Startalk what it is today. Neil, when u talk like that it puts me in a trance. Please give us more of you and your way of communicating in future episodes. I miss when YOU were the focus. Im not trying to discredit anyother person associated with Startalk. But your the true 🌟
General relativity and quantum mechanics will never be combined until we realize that they take place at different
moments in time. Because causality has a speed limit(c)
every point in space where you observe it from will be the closest to the present moment. When we look out into
the universe, we see the past which is made of particles
(GR). When we try to look at smaller and smaller sizes and
distances, we are actually looking closer and closer to the present moment (QM). The wave property of particles appears
when we start looking into the future of that particle. It is a probability wave because the future is probabilistic.
Wave function collapse happens when we bring a particle into the
present/past. GR is making measurements in the predictable
past. QM is trying to make measurements of the probabilistic future
Hey wow!! Nice thought/explanation!
This perspective is very interesting, but it oversimplifies the complexities of unifying GR and QM.
It overlooks the spacetime continuum's role, the current theoretical efforts like string theory, and the various interpretations of quantum mechanics beyond the Copenhagen interpretation.
Oh, I like that.
I think Roger Penrose would expand on that and say- at great distances when individual particles can have no interaction with any other particle, the scale of space collapses. What was a hot vibrating particle no longer has a reference against which it can be seen to be vibrating - so it becomes totally cold - totally organised.That is the state of Entropy swaps state when scale and relative position can not be measured.
I'd like to add - information, the observation of any interaction, the structure of relationships is also scale dependent, like one H2O molecule is not 'water', but two of them may be able to interact AS water. They observe each other.
This is good explanation of why string theory is junk science
Doctor Tyson. Some beetle do indeed look up! For just a moment please consider the navigational technique that has been discovered is being employed by the beetle species called Scarabaeus satyrus, aka the common scarab beetle. It apparently orients itself and directs its direction of travel by using the Milky Way Galaxy strewn across the night sky as its visual local map to keep its navigation true. Thank you for the StarTalk show.
I have indeed become a fan of you and all of your regularly appearing friends.
Neil and Chuck for 2024!
I think Neil is too smart to run for President 😂
Janna is the first guess I can relate too. The Quantum world makes me question the nature of reality too.
The fault of that is more from physicists losing track of what is "reality" and what isn't. Especially the "is math invented or discovered" argument. Math is a language created to DESCRIBE reality. It isn't reality itself. And so the continuation of that is how you have this "quantum wave function", which is just describing probabilities, being treated as reality itself rather than just a description of it. The grass outside is reality. The word "grass" is the description of that reality. The grass is real, the word "grass" isn't.
@@VaeldargThat’s one interpretation but nobody knows yet what the true interpretation is. It could be that the wave function is actually what is there, and the particle only our way of describing it within spacetime accurately. We can’t assume either way.
@@YivvaMedia Interpretations are not created equal, though. Science isn't about perfect explanations, it is about which one gets the closest. And so the further your interpretation is from reality, it means it is worse, not better.
"It could be that the wave function is actually what is there..." except it can't. Because it's math written just to describe reality and not reality itself. It's a function describing statistical probability, and reality is under no obligation to go by how you describe what you think it is.
Thanks!
Love when Dr Levin is on! The best guest!
#Question
In the TV Series
Star Trek Voyager
The Borg open a “Trans-Dimensional Rift” which opened a “Gateway” to Species 8472 and when Voyager goes through that Rift they end up in “Fluidic Space” when Space isn’t really Space, it is Matter.
So think of Space as we know it Only it isn’t “Space” it is filled with Matter (Think of moving through water like a Submarine) the Submarine is the spaceship and the water is Space.
(Keeping in mind the “Multiverse” would something like that possible AND how would Physics work in that Realm?
Interesting question, but I doubt the rules of physics change that much or at all, even in said alternative universe. I think this multiverse theory is more like all the possible futures that spring from choices, like you in another multiverse are a dropout or you don't exist because your parents haven't met because of another choice someone else made. Don't take what I say for the correct answer, but only of what I understood multiverse to be. Or to not make it about people only, because we are not that important, lets say the life didn't evolve on Earth because there were no meteorites, because lets say Jupiter pulled them and formed some Jupiter moon. (just babbling at this point, but lets hope you get what I'm saying)
@@helloukw Yep I get what you are saying.
In a Star Trek the Next Generation Episode Data says something along the lines of a Theory that everything that *CAN BE* actually exists (I'm paraphrasing)
In essence every choice you make spawns different outcomes in other universes.
Example, You are on your way to work and as you get to your car you realize you left your coffee on the kitchen table, do you go back and get it OR decide to get a cup from the Vending machine at work, OR go through the drive through of a Dunkin Donuts?
In the Multiverse ALL of those scenarios get played out.
If you go back to grab your coffee off the table you are now 1 minutes behind the other two "You's" and being behind by 1 minute means as you are driving through an intersection at the exact moment a drunk driver T-Bones you killing you. The problem with that type of Multiverse is there are 8 Billion people on earth and each person makes a couple of hundred decisions each and every day, SO you would have like 100 Trillion "New Universes" spawning every single day, so it just gets ridiculous to even try and comprehend "The Multiverse"
But a Universe that is made up of "Matter" would (I think) have very different physics, I'll explain.
In Space we have pockets of Matter (planets,stars,comets,asteroids etc etc) BUT in-between them all is the "Vacuum" of space, basically a "Void"
NOW imagine that "Vacuum/Void" is filled with Matter (in the episode they use the term (Fluidic Space)
Which is why I did the Submarine moving through the Ocean analogy
Now let's say I'm outside and there is a canopy covering the entrance to a building that Canopy blocks the light in it's tracks, BUT now I'm swimming in a swimming pool that is outside I dive down and look up through the water, I can see the light as it is able to move through the water.
Now in the vacuum of space light moves at 186k miles per second BUT light moves slower when moving through water as in the vacuum of space nothing impedes it, but water does (not much) but it does take light longer when moving through liquid, SO in a "Fluid Space" everything that moves through space would be interacting with Everything around it.
A submarine "Displaces water" as it moves through it so in theory a spaceship moving through "Fluidic Space" would be dispersing "Space"
The speed of light would be slower
Everything would be interacting with everything within us "Sphere of influence" instead of "Pockets of Mass" in "Normal Space" there would be "Pockets of Void" in Fluidic Space???
I know I'm rambling but I think the physics would NEED to be vastly different just as everything ABOVE the Ocean operates quite differently BELOW the Ocean (Pressure, Atmosphere, Resistance)
We have a working understanding of how OUR Universe works, I'm just curious as to how if instead of Vast Vacuums/Voids of Space, we had Small pockets of Vacuums/Voids in Matter.
Sorry for such a long post.
She is a great guest. I hope you have her on more.
The existance of only one electron in the universe that simply runs back anf forth through time can explain a lot. 1) why they the same 2) problems of large numbers: in a universe with a mass of 10^56g approximatly 10^80 electrons and the ratio of the visible universe size to the electrone size exatly 10^40. That is just one layer to go back in time 3) the experiment with two slits is easily explained 4) positrons just electrons moving back in time 5) collision of electron and positron destruction of the loop. Therefore , there are so few of them for the whole structure to work.
This is blowing my mind 😮😮
Wow. Then perhaps the logical conclusion in such a setting is that there is only one sole entity for each kind of quark and lepton. Sure is trippy!
Fun fact, this theory was just a meme
Chuck is in another dimension😂
I was thinking the same thing 🤣
Is Chuck real? 🤯
Chuck is definitely high hahahahaha I know that look anywhere 😂😂😂
@@Eyewillshinereactions 😂😂😂
I LOVE HER!
These are the exact types of questions I ponder in private, with many of the same answers.
If Janna, Chuck, Neil, Gary, and Charles Liu were in one room that would be INSANE. Just saying.
You are correct, good Sir!
these talks with janna levin are legendary. absolutely amazing!
Ohh im SOOOO rrady for thia video! I love jana levin!!🎉
You are my new go to background chat! I've always clicked on any short with you in but now I'm hooked on the whole show 😊
This is a great show if it’s Neil and Chuck. As much as I love Neil, whenever there’s a guest, they can’t put their thoughts and arguments across without him constantly interrupting/speaking over them. It’s a shame that I would have loved for Janna to have rambled for an hour without someone talking over her. Anyway cheers.
Love this stuff. I just wish Neil wouldn’t keep interrupting to add his two cents onto everything
Janna is charismatic, beautiful, intelligent and funny. A true Marvel of our universe ✨️
would bang
@@tacotuesday2223You never touched a woman in your life😂
@@tacotuesday2223preach
39:40 f
I don't believe that 'many worlds' means separate universes each of whom has its own mass, since it's the continuation of superposition of eigenstates in a particle. A particle of mass m being in two nearby positions at once doesnt mean the region containing both positions suddenly containing 2m.
Neil, I absolutely love u, but please let her finish her train of thought before talking about your conclusions or completing her thoughts. It's challenging for the avarage expectator to follow it. I tend to do the same when it comes to linguistics, though, 'cause it's such an exciting topic XD
Gotta get up in 3h for work, worth it
For a long time I've been thinking the same thing in mind. It's all started how magnets work. Who gives them magnetic power. Most of the theory I build up in my mind including relativity, gravity, space are inline with this podcast.
This woman is the Formula One pilot of theoretical physics. Look at that shirt. Listen to her speak. She's awesome. I am now full of awe. Thank you.
driver,formula 1 are drivers.
@@8thfold206 Not really :)
@@ailigimmo9668they literally never said they are pilots,drivers call themself drivers so yes really.
Neil.
Loved this.
One electron??
In a lay-by outside a pub in Wales, resting in a VW camper van after several beers in about 1996 a fellow physicist and I discussed what we called the Lorentzian. You will be very familiar with the square root of 1 minus u squared over c squared. This told our alcohol fueled brains that the photon experienced no time.
In other words, ad absurdum, there only needed to be one photon in ALL of the macroscopic universe.
I went on to write a program which integrated Dirac's Equation forward in time., and saw some interesting time recursive results in my programming... probably artifacts??
I was offered a studentship by several universities but for personal reasons I thereafter experienced a post graduate teaching degree, followed by an extended a trip to South Africa but I got bored so returned to attend a Masters in Microwave Physics followed by working for a research company in the UK.
Meanwhile said mate AJ was working on his PhD at Imperial College with Superconductivity, some of his work had resonance with my research so we collaborated under the radar.
AJ got his PhD and shortly after he died... what a great loss.
All that aside... The Photon Experiences NO TIME. Discuss.
Talking about notes and cords… the first thing that popped it to my head was A-minoooooooooooooor 😭
🤣🤣🤣..Very Funny
😂
Wait is this reference to something that I'm missing ?
@@LW1TokKendrick Lamar vs drake
your measuring is the partical in universe. so wouldn't it not care if its in milky way or Andromeda it scans the reality to see if it is still exists or not. the question is can you send it and it not pop up? that would mean it left the universe which is the first steps to traveling to the multiverse.
34:50 A hyper cube looks awfully a lot like a cube growing in size, so if time was the forth spacial dimension at the last time "axis" value the cube is bigger than it was at the first. I have no idea if any of what I just said is correct. Feel free to correct me, I'm a mathematician not a physicist
"If...maybe...could...might...what if...possibly...perhaps..."
That is theoretical physics for you.
Only a Sith speaks in absolutes 👽
Janna Levin, Neil Tyson, Michio Kaku and Brian Greene are my absolute favorite science explainers on the laws of physics and everything about the Universe.
Yes, Brian Greene knocks it out of the park every time
Testing
The level of quality of this conversation is just like syrup, leaves out a delicious taste with each bite 😍😍😍
Worse things in life than getting closer to Janna...
Yeah but dude needs some space to stretch out and move around, he looks mad stiff and uncomfortable cause he doesnt want to be in her space, they gotta move in a bigger space lol or move him to the middle
Jenna is an attractive lady. But her intelligence is what causes her to win any hand of cards.
@@bradheath4200Since you said it first…I usually have a thing for Janna, but she seems to look older for some reason in this episode. Being that she’s so intelligent I find her so attractive but not as much on this one.lol I’ll admit that it’s not “cool” to deduce her down to her looks because she’s so much more than that. But since you mentioned it, I had to share my ignorance. lol
@@2011e92M3 May I suggest you delete this?
@@2011e92M3 maybe it's just a bad hair day? Thanks for sharing.
Let Janna finish her sentence, geez
Lol
Being a person, thanks to ADD, who has been known to interrupt people when I get interested or excited about a subject, I think NDT gets honestly excited about the topics they discuss. It can be frustrating to listen to but his excitement is definitely contagious and exciting.
If she is not offended then you have no right to be imo
@@josephfuller6229Get your eyes checked?
@@josephfuller6229 Get eyes checked? :(
My wife and I LOVE you and Star Talk. So much that we have been listening to you after alot at the hospital after giving birth to our beautiful baby boy Oliver. ❤❤👼👼
The Ms, Professor Lady is really good thank you for your help however I think she is a asset to the competition it's a win win /when when She is a Sponsor for Greater good we'll all have fun trust and be blessed
Can you please let J speak ? Why do they have to be so loud and constantly interrupt her. That is zero educated and not sophisticated way of interviewing someone.
Someone said to Einstein, "You have accomplished great things because you stood on the shoulders of Newton." To this Einstein replied, "No. I stood on the shoulders of Maxwell." This is an important distinction. You can still say he stood on the shoulders of Newton, but you should acknowledge that people like James Clerk Maxwell are in between. Einstein credited Maxwell for the basic ideas that led him to the theory of relativity and the famous equation.
Dung beetles use the Milky Way to navigate their poo balls in a straight line at night if i remember correctly. 🌙💩 🌟 So they do look up. Great episode!
WallE.
We look into the night sky because our consciousness yearns to return to the universe.
That's ridiculous....we look at the nigh sky because it's humongous and sparkly
Just because we look up doesnt mean we are separate from the universe.
Earth isn't separate from the universe. How can we retuen to a place we are already at? That's like living in the state of Ohio and being inside your home and saying you yearn to return to Ohio.
That’s a very unscientific assertion based on zero evidence.
Sounds more like a religious statement.
Oh my my !! Yes indeed to everything you shared with us today !
I assumed that the DEEP grief I have been feeling was the "death" of my "ego"... And that is surely partly true !
Yet I was also feeling a Collective "Death" (from the initial Creation of 'Ego'?)... Either way, what a super intense purge and heal that is going on !!!! 💥💞
I slept for 13 hours last night !!! With lots of what my guides called this time ;
Cascading Dreams !!!
Repetitive small dreams (about a minute long) that were the same dream from many different perspectives !!
I think Paul in UK said he experienced something like that a couple of weeks ago.
Anyway, it was clearly stated by my Guides that this was really deep complete clearing of an issue, whether my own or Collective, I experienced dozens of views and perspectives on the the same "dream" material !
And I woke up with a MUCH lighter outlook on my Ego issues !
Tho BOY has this been hard !!!!
✌️💞😇
Janna, marry me and teach me about the universe
ahhh another man of taste!
For the longest time I thought her name was Jan Eleven ha
I’ve heard ….stranger things. ;)
@@moonshoes11get outta here 😑 👉 🚪
So at 16:30 in the video when they are talking about water being h2o, are yall not aware of d2o / heavy water?
You should accept an interview and debate Terrence Howard
Neil is so “Mr. I know everything” and arrogant that unfortunately this will never happen?
Why debate when Mr Howard can just write papers on his works. Why should he care what NDT thinks when he can submit his work and let all the scientist of the world read and decide for themselves.
@@rashadd2615 why should anyone care what NDT thinks after his recent negative IQ takes on jendah? guy is a shill and nothing more!
Why aren’t you talking and interviewing Terrence Howard? it seems this person is using his work and theory!
😂 Terrence Howard. You embarrass yourself by your comment.
45:31 Manyworlds vs many possible states and ocums razor. Manyworlds over ascribes the system, many possible states is a better representation. A splitting would require crazy energy input. Tunable metamaterial for slits as one of the tests and orbital energy levels on the shell. As to the time traveling electron or photon old theories for students. No cherenkov radiation or such.
The Einstein story is just a joke, it's not real 😂
It is frustrating that the guest kept being interrupted - I’d really like to hear her full thoughts.
@22:40 She didn't say space-time is not real -- unless we're experiencing the initial conditions of the universe 'Big Bang' mere moments after it emerges/instantiates/explodes.
This lady says gravity doesn’t fundamentally exist. Terrence Howard said the same thing. Difference between them. One has a degree and one use to be an actor.
there are a lot more differences
The difference is the treatment? 🤔🫢😭
@celinesrazor She explains it as existing and not existing with quantum theory. Im not familiar with what Terrance described but he did say many things that many question. If one thinks this about skin color while we are watching 2 folks with the same tone here without questioning either. Neil and this young lady have a reputation as experienced in this field for years. Im not sure if Terrances reputation has reached the level of being reputable. Considering us normal folks arent able to debunk him with our knowledge some see his theory's as true, maybe, i cant prove him wrong or right. However, some seem to have done just that. Yet again im not smart enough to say whos right so we go with, most generally the one that has proven to many as correct. Sorry so long winded here. Takecare
I used to love Neil deGrasse Tyson and this show. But once I found out that he wasn't willing to have this exact type of conversation with Terrence Howard when he reached out to Neil with the new science that he is bringing to light. Like you said Neil, even if you cant agree at the end of the conversation you could have at least agreed that more or better data could resolve the underlying issue. I really think that Terrence Howard has proven himself to be knowledgeable enough to be heard by the scientific community. And it is completely counter intuitive to simply dismiss ideas that are not considered 'mainstream' in the scientific world.
Science has always been based on facts that can be proven to or checked by other peers. At this point it would seem that his theory isnt provable or he hasnt shown it to be proven by people way smarter then us. We basically have to take the judgment of people smarter than us in this field as a conclusion for now. Its very possible that he will get his respect in the future, or he just tarnished his credibility.
One more thought, Terrance is extremely likeable as well as very knowledgeable. However wanting him to be right on the behalf of his likness can mudy anyones judgment. I mean no disrespect here and im also looking at this with less knowledge on of what Terrance speaks than what i can tell you have. Ive only seen a short video of another gentleman debating this with him on the Rogans podcast. At this point, like i said on my previous comment, its basically up to him to continue the work while proving it to be factually scientific. Thanks
Given that large masses create depressions in spacetime, does this imply that there are additional curvatures and interactions in spacetime beyond those depressions, suggesting that our understanding of gravitational pull is incomplete?
This sounds very Terrance Howardish… just more scientifically coherent
Are you saying TH's theory is NOT scientifically coherent..?
@@SydneyD28-6 no I’m saying the communication here seems more coherent and precise even though the overall idea seems similar to his
Funny, Terrence Howard said the same thing, there is no such thing as gravity.
No that’s not what she said
Yup!!!
In a way, gravity is a product of bending space. Space is a physical medium canvas, that matter is painted in. Because matter affects the shape of space gravity is a byproduct correlation [bending of space] verse causation [graviton]. I dont believe that particle exist. But neither is proven yet. But we have reasons to believe either is a possible answer.
@@orionx79 yeah I agree… but either way you are just stating the scientific consensus, you are not agreeing with Terrence Howard 😂 your comment is just going to confuse the ignorant
@@AmpSkillz well that almost always happens anyways.
You should talk about the hypothetical design of Dyson sphere. The main intent is correct, collect as much of the “free” energy of the star to sustain your civilization. So a Dyson Sphere is one way to image it. But even for an advanced society, too many things would be a waste of resources and surface area to build a sphere.
1. If you wanted the centripetal acceleration to offset the sun’s gravity and create some artificial gravity; you would rotate it. But then only a ring around the inside of its equator would have gravity. Therefore the sphere would have to be constructed strong enough to resist the suns gravity and be built without the aid of rotation. There are just so many challenges that would make it impractical.
2. A Dyson swarm would be more likely. There is just a whole list of reasons why this would make more sense from a resource and methodical approach to collecting a stars energy. It would most likely be built at the smallest diameters to the star with orbits to collect the energy and have the obits that intersect each other be constructed at different orbital distances.
Manufacturing and energy collection would happen at the closer orbits while O’Neil cylinders and Niven Ring’s would occupy the Goldilocks obits. Astronomical research and other scientific research would happen at the outer most rings and orbits.
The Dyson swarm would make the most logical progression to encompass a star, but you would have to have the system actively correcting itself and avoiding collisions. All stray comets and asteroids would have to be controlled to prevent collisions. Otherwise you would have a Stellar Kessler Syndrome or Dyson Swarm Debris Cascade.
Either way, with self replicating AI stellar orbiting modules. Even with our primitive understanding, you could envision turning a star system into a Dyson Swarm.
I would NOT recommend a species to convert a habitable system like ours into a Dyson swarm. It would make more sense to turn a nearby red dwarf system into a manufacturing facility using an AI controlled Dyson Swarm.
Next guest TERRANCE HOWARD, don't be scared Neil
Theoretical physics is one thing... but utter nonsense from a rambling idiot doesn't feel like StarTalk content. But, maybe if they're doing to do an entire episode on Dunning Kruger.
I am always amazed at the richness of the human mind! There are so many mysteries. I love this channel! New Patron member!
We, as a society, need programs and communicators to share current science with us.
I loved this episode! She is great! I understand things I’ve never considered before. Thanks, Neil, for putting this content out there.
Incredible guest. Her terminology and how she uses everyday layman language makes me feel slightly less dumb and it’s cool to catch little bits just based on wording.
I think that there should be an episode showcasing Neil's book collection.
45:03 - "I´m the only lucky guy in the multiverse who happens to get heads every the time" / "Yeah, because that would be hard to swallow" - HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Awesome episode. Dr. Tyson is an incredible story teller. He has the ability to make science come alive for his audience. I taught science for 36 years, and I always aspired to generate interest and enthusiasm in my students, to create lifelong learners. 👍
Been watching videos while I clean. All of a sudden had the idea that black holes are potentially objects of such mass they overcome the surface tension of space and become smaller universes, but are maintained in contact through a "pinhole" due to whatever the fabric of space being made of being un-tearable. Thens this video comes up next!
10:17 This is what philosophers set out for debates to be. I think a famous philosopher said that from the debator's point of view you should only think you had a debate if you had the privilege of helping someone else reach enlightenment or the better privilege of being enlightened. These scientists are modern day philosophers
Her eloquence. Her ability to express concepts through language. I want to SCREAM.
mind blowing stuff from this lady in the first minute of the video... thank you
When quarks gluon bond break and they multiply , do they then attach back ? Or stay unbonded ? , and if they bond and you break the gluon bond again do they carry on multiplying ?
What if you do this on scale and then compress all the quarks with the force of universe , do you get matter ? Antimatter ? Atoms ? Could we utilise this for our prosperity ?
Among the loveliest things in this life, and rarely observed, is the genuine laugh of female nerds. It’s fantastic! Fortunately, someone was around to hear it or there would have been no sound.
49:29 some kid in the year 7240
"MOM someone sent a fart through the teleporter again!"
I'm not a😊 big brain, but I love your conversations. In other words, it's like a child sitting in on the adult conversation. Until later, I will be that child.❤❤❤❤❤👏👏👏👏👏
Exactly!!!! Its like rediscovering your childhood!!!