Why Prehistoric Planet Season 2 Was Great (But Not Perfect) | Prehistoric Planet 2 (2023) Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @SamTheGiganfan
    @SamTheGiganfan  Рік тому +4

    In case anyone is wondering, I'd give Across the Spider-Verse an 8/10

    • @gattycroc8073
      @gattycroc8073 Рік тому

      I have not seen it but its looks like not what I was expecting from a Spider-Verse sequel. I was expecting a story similar to Dark Night Metal storyline where a bunch of evil spider man trying to take over the multiverse.

    • @johnpass2348
      @johnpass2348 Рік тому

      I thought season 2 was far more excited then season 1 honestly:) 10/10

  • @kiarash608
    @kiarash608 Рік тому +10

    I kinda love the more "basic" behaviours tbh, they deserve the PHP treatment too imo; i've never seen a T.rex hunt with that level of great CGI or with Attenborough narrating on top. Same with Oviraptorid nesting, i've seen it before, but not with *this* quality. "Basic" behaviours did happen, after all. It's only fair to showcase them also in what's meant to be a realistic portrayal of prehistory

  • @prestonanimates7971
    @prestonanimates7971 Рік тому +7

    I felt a little disappointed as well but I was fine with some creatures returning from season 1. I would have loved creatures like deinocheirous and therizosaurus to get more of a spotlight. As much as I loved the show, I would’ve liked a walking with dinosaurs format better like sticking to a timezone or in this case region in the world. For example showing an episode that focuses on the hell creek formation and how all of the animals interact with each other, because in general prehistoric planet mostly just focuses on a stand alone creature each segment instead of multiple interacting.

  • @garrettdonovan8238
    @garrettdonovan8238 Рік тому +4

    My biggest problem with season 2 was how much shorter the episodes were than in season 1, especially since some of the episodes had only 5 segments, as opposed to 6 or 7

    • @einarzoo7688
      @einarzoo7688 13 днів тому

      I Agree. After the final episode I just sat there thinking “was that it?”

  • @bkjeong4302
    @bkjeong4302 Рік тому +2

    I consider Season 2 a slight improvement on Season 1, though I do think it could have been better.
    Both seasons are significantly better than literally every other paleodoc out there, WWD included.

  • @Sirdilophosaurusthethird2.0
    @Sirdilophosaurusthethird2.0 Рік тому +5

    I wached it and it’s perfect in my opinion

  • @_boogatti_
    @_boogatti_ Рік тому +4

    If a majority of negatives are wanting to see more, rather than the show being bad, it’s definitely grounds for another season. Or hell, just more in general

  • @Bob-kd3iv
    @Bob-kd3iv Рік тому

    hello sanuel

  • @kylecollier7569
    @kylecollier7569 Рік тому +1

    Both seasons were an 8.1-8.2/10 for me. Oceans for me was the worst episode of season two because it's just a standard episode of The Blue Planet or anything that involved life in the ocean but replacing modern animals with prehistoric ones and comes across as just bland. I feel that having seen the Walking with Series and other animal documentaries throughout the 2000's really spoiled me in terms of what I want in a new representation of the prehistoric world. The same things I watched as a kid (and I was fine with even if it would be a baby animal being mutilated but hey that's nature when it can be cruel but also makes sense) but done in a way where it isn't "sugar-coated" or tame which then makes it less real than it is. The final episode of season two was the only one that felt real and not just look real.

    • @kade-qt1zu
      @kade-qt1zu Рік тому

      Isn't that sort of the point of prehistoric planet though?

    • @kylecollier7569
      @kylecollier7569 Рік тому

      @@kade-qt1zu Yes that is true however, for me at least, most of Prehistoric Planet didn't quite feel as real as it should've been. Again having watched a lot of documentaries from my childhood growing up in the 2000's, I feel like I've been spoilt in terms of seeing how the natural world can be cruel when it is captured on film. Yes there's a lot of baby murder in this series, but it's mostly done by either pterosaurs or marine reptiles. Heck outside the baby murder most of this series has so little blood, with a couple of exceptions in the beginning of Coasts and the second segment of Freshwater in season one, that when it's supposed to look and feel real it fails at it. Heck season two at times did better with the blood and gore aspect when it's needed but not over the top.
      It isn't just the lack of blood that's the issue, it's also the mating scenes that were an issue in season one especially but season two fixed in Islands and North America. The mating scenes in season two were done in a way that not only looks and feels real but isn't done in an attention seeking way nor censored in a way that defeats the point of building up the final result.
      I know I'm sounding a bit harsh, but I feel like I'm making a fair criticism statement having seen all episodes of this series.

  • @jayor8921
    @jayor8921 Рік тому

    2nd

  • @Kamata-Kizzle
    @Kamata-Kizzle Рік тому

    Sam sam sam dam san msa mea ne sa m