Journey to the Sea of Cortez HD
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 бер 2024
- In March 1940, author John Steinbeck and marine biologist Ed Ricketts sailed to the Sea of Cortez. At the height of World War II in Europe and on the eve of Pearl Harbor, they sought a new understanding of mankind's relationship to the natural world. Can the story of their journey inspire new efforts to preserve the Sea of Cortez or the Gulf of California and the global biosphere of the oceans?
- Розваги
❤ thankyou for this knowledge ❤
You're very welcome!
Forgive us Father God for what man has done to Mother Earth. 😥
There needs to be some place that salute can go where no one is going to bother them. They can go rest and like in safety.
That would surely be nice.
This is interesting
We agree!
Is the narrator Dick Rodstein?
The best
@@Jorma17 agreed! Best narrator since Rod Serling.
Fascinating, I fear eight billion people on earth is fast approaching a tipping point, unsustainable.
Great video. I don't know how many people would be too much. To me, it's more about how they operate.
For instance, Commercial Fishing is exploiting the ocean's resources, as it always has, and NEEDS STRICT BOUNDARIES and QUOTAS.
Not to be confused with Sport Fishing, that actually contributes to conservation efforts.
That's a cyclical subject. Whenever populations seem to get to the perceived limits, wars tend to break out and cull the numbers. Just a personal observation.
if we actually tried we could sustain a lot more than 8 billion
@@vinnieg6161 why would we want to? Less people more aboundance
@@brucepoole8552 yea, great.
You go tell all those people they should stop having kids, I don't think that works
Hey youtube what is your rival doing here?
UA-cam is a bit of a dying platform after google has ruined it aye.
@@sten4982 what you mean people just Love the censorship
White-sided dolphins?? Isn't that the Orcas or whale sharks??
White-sided Dolphins are their own thing
I'll tell you why I didn't appreciate this video because it was done just to promote someone's book. Within 09 seconds of reporting, you say, "the author John Steinbeck...: and continue to say, "they sought an understanding of mankind's relationship to the natural world" they never go back to showing any evidence of this question, so why say this when in fact you are just promoting their book and even try to say that this book of Jim Casey "The Grapes of Wrath"; then using their adventure as a support of this current book (I wonder did you get permission to use this information or can anyone use their information to support unknown writers simply to sell a new book. This author must have a lot of money to hire you to sell his book because you have used so much known data of those who "HAVE MADE IT" but are dead.
However, with all the information at your fingertips, you never gave evidence to the question, what is the understanding of mankind's relationship to the natural work? This video then becomes a wealth of how not to "PLAGLARIZE" others work or writings.
And we get all riled up when a shark eats a measly 10 to 20 humans a year, while we kill millions each year for not even 10% of the carcass just the fin.
If one shark kills that many people, everyone should be worried.
Save the Birkenstock cows, too. Cows kill more people than sharks. Pigs kill even more.
That is the lamest argument.... So what's the solution. Humans can only kill 10-20 sharks a year?
"we kill"
be more specific
@dan8910100
I was specific...... Humans. What were you meaning by "specific?" You weren't specific. Did you want specific names and addresses of the killers?
@dan8910100
These UA-cam comment'ers will say anything to avoid the point. Semantics, spelling, grammar, name calling, etc. Anything except making a legitimate point with facts and opinions weighted with past observations, logical reasoning, or preferences with explanation.