This Guy Won By Only Moving Pawns 😲
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 чер 2024
- Timestamps
0:00 Intro
0:49 Game 1: Knockout in 4 moves
3:43 Game 2: White without knight
7:43 Game 3: Mate in 8 moves
14:51 Game 4: Checkmate queen
18:40 Game 5: White without queen
24:15 Game 6: Win by moving pawns
30:33 Game 7: Correspondence game
33:55 Game 8: Eye appeal
37:12 Game 9: King trilema
39:10 Game 10: Legal's mate
42:23 Game 11: Sudden move
44:40 Game 12: Blackburne Shilling gambit
48:00 Game 13: Offer of the knight
51:07 Game 14: Pin followed by a fork
54:21 Game 15: Queen sacrifice
1:01:37 Nelson game
1:05:13 Nelson game 2
1:22:14 Nelson game 3
1:45:12 Nelson game 4
👨🏽 Play Chess Here:
www.chess.com/membership?ref_...
🍒 Most students gain 200+ points in months:
chessvibescourses.thinkific.c...
![Solid & Powerful Chess Opening For Black Against 1.e4 [Tricks & Traps]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/f0FIJePXmgk/mqdefault.jpg)
Here are the timestamps:
0:00 Intro
0:49 Game 1: Knockout in 4 moves
3:43 Game 2: White without knight
7:43 Game 3: Mate in 8 moves
14:51 Game 4: Checkmate queen
18:40 Game 5: White without queen
24:15 Game 6: Win by moving pawns
30:33 Game 7: Correspondence game
33:55 Game 8: Eye appeal
37:12 Game 9: King trilema
39:10 Game 10: Legal's mate
42:23 Game 11: Sudden move
44:40 Game 12: Blackburne Shilling gambit
48:00 Game 13: Offer of the knight
51:07 Game 14: Pin followed by a fork
54:21 Game 15: Queen sacrifice
1:01:37 Nelson game
1:05:13 Nelson game 2
1:22:14 Nelson game 3
1:45:12 Nelson game 4
Nelson, can you please put it in the video description?
Boosting this! Thank you
Wow people like you are true angels
Thanks!
@@obesedog23 he isn't angel he's angle of tangent line
@@Chomta 🤨
Very interesting episode. More of this format (book and then play) please. Thank you
This was great! You have my vote to do more. 😀
Same
Game 14 was my favorite.
What a fun book!
This was great to have both some games from a book and your current games in the same video. Hopefully you can continue this at some point in the future. Some of the old games may have unrealistic blunders, but it might still be worth going through some of them from time to time. Maybe you can read through the games in the book in advance and pick the most relevant ones.
47:00 Blackburne-Shilling gambit game is a similar idea to the fried liver trap you showed us. I've won several games with the latter, but never tried the Blackburne-Shilling. Thank you!
How did I miss this video?? I LOVE that book. It was rebuying that book (after losing it ages ago) and the Niemann Scandal that got me back into chess!
The "Cow" opening Knight moves not getting allot of love early on
The fastest correspondence game ever was possibly 1 move. Depends how you view this situation: As the players agreed to play the black player said he will play 1...g6 and 2...Bg7 against anything. So White opened 1 b3 and black resigned. Lol
Why did bro even resign 💀
Love your commentary and analysis.😅 😊
I wonder if the pole was slightly influenced by there being more people around at the end that had only seen the games 🤷♂️
Either are great, the games are always a winner, but the games in that book were really neat too.
All I had growing up were my dad's old chess books so I actually originally learned on old-school notation in the 90's
The book was fun and interesting. You can always through in some of those before, in between, or after your rapid games
Game 2 with the knight removed is almost an advantage because that's one less piece to defend, one less to develop, so you only have to move the bishop to castle. I saw a similar game without a queens rook and instantly that's one attacking bishop threat you don't have to deal with.
33:30 not exactly a "free queen" as you gave up a knight and bishop for the queen, but I guess that's still enough in a game between masters.
23:20 The Mate-in-3 I found was Nf5 instead of Ne2 and I think that works as well.
Love the old school notation!
just bought that 1000 games book . subscribed too !! love chess
At 54m, I think Bb5 first does work if it's followed by Be3. The problem with Be3 first is Qa5, if Bb5 first the queen has nowhere to run after Be3. It's not quite as good as b4 since you likely give up two pieces for the queen instead of one (if black played Bd7 instead of Nc6), but still pretty good.
At 42:02 you need to play h3 as white and if the bishop moves to h5 then you continue the legal's mate. If knight captures your knight, Queen takes Bishop, Knight takes your bishop you check at b5 and take his knight and you're up a pawn.
Idea for next speed run: go until you hit a new PR. The end could be frustrating but the drama will be fun to watch. PR can be format specific, so you can pick the most realistic time format for you. Or choose whatever rules to make it realistic
Is there any chance you have any makhail tal games you analysis???
Great video
I practice chess with my kids with odds games. My youngest (7) gets queen-and-rook odds, my middle child (10) currently gets queen odds, and my oldest (11) is at rook odds. The oldest started at queen-and-rook odds, and they're all able to make me sweat to find my way out, but still struggle in actually checkmating. Mostly because by 10 minutes in their attention span is running too short to do the checkmates - not because of my board position.
So far most of those games are kind of annoying to play because I lack one of the rooks to castle with. Their benefit, of course.
that was a quirky pawn game. a pretty potential ending
If this stream showed you anything, its that DEVELOPING right away is the most important thing in chess. And Not putting your knight in front of the queen, that too. :D
game 5 - that italian opening it's pretty dangerous in this format :D
I actually won a game with mate about 10 days ago without moving any original pieces. I was W - opened d4 as usual and B played the lousy Engulnd gambit - e5. I took. d6 and I took. I can't remember the full details after that but he brought his Q out trying for a quick mate. I had to do a few pawn blocks but in between took on c7 and b8, promoted to a Q and managed to mate with that Q without moving any other piece.
The Max Lange Attack variation in the Italian opening is based around Legel's mate.
I liked having both the book and the games in one video.
Now you know how I felt when everything started switching to algebraic.
11:14 Actually Nelson made a video of this checkmate before where he gave us for option to choose....
Unless I am missing something, this "fork" is not an actual fork...@32:44 after knight takes pawn for the "fork" on the Queen and Rook, why can't white play Queen to d5 covering the rook and cancelling the fork?
Why is it assumed that white King has to take the Black knight?
Have you tried playing against Martin by only playing pawns?
Hi Nelson , I was brought up using the old " descriptive " notation & coming back to chess after 40+ years took a while to get used to the algebraic . Now I'm more used to it , I prefer it as it is far less complicated & looking back at old school matches I played in 1970 's , I made so many errors in recording games , that many were " spoiled " trying to replay them ! Loving these short games but couldn't watch live as I'm in England , but did wake up to it 🥳 . Many thanks for doing this , it's fascinating !! Wonder if playing a knight in front of king /queen was in vogue in those days ? Thanks again.
I have played the Legàl's mate before. You should have seen the face of my opponent when they greedily took my queen and got checkmated!!😂‼️‼️
I didn't watch the steam live, but I was like you to do a couple of games and then do some live games to try them out. That way we get the best of both worlds, and it'll stretch it out so there'll be lots of content.
Felt wierd on game 15 that i found the mate in 16 or however many moves immediately but spent like 20 mins looking for the mate n 5 and had to give up
nice chess trivia book
In Game #3 the "forced" mate hinges on the initial pawn move being played in response to Q-R5 yet K-K2 can also be played and is winning for white but I couldn't see a forced mate.
Edit: I found one! Mate in seven:- Q-R5, K-K2; Q-B2+, K-Q3; N(on B3)-N5+, KxN(on K4): Q-Q5+, K-KB4; p-Q3+, K-KN4; p-R3+, K-R4; p-KN3#
In new money that's Qg5, Ke7; Qf7+, Kd6; Nb5+, KxN(e5); Qd5+, Kf4; d3+, Kg4; h3+, Kh4, g3#
In the correspondence game, couldn't white play Q-R4+?
This is great! More plz.
32:57 White isn't forced to take the knight. He could have simply moved the queen out of harms way. Yes he'd have lost a rook but the knight is (at least temporarily) trapped. You shouldn't resign simply because you lost a rook.
The queen can defend the rook as well.
at 1:14:49 Q to A7 - rook is toast. Is that good? Loved this post - ordered the book. Thank you for all you do.
2:46 Correction, it's Queen to Rook 4 you 100 elos.
23:20 wouldn’t nf5+ have worked here too?
This recorded live could not have come in a better moment : 3
I'm gonna be without internet for like 5 days and guess what I'm downloading to keep me entertained?
All genious
Love this !!!!!! Makes great opening even if not immediate mate. Won 3 Nil - partner in shock 😮 what just happened ⚡️ v quick massacre 🙌
You castled through check. Knight controls H1!
fisherman coming back?
32:57 why resign if you can just de a Qa4+
you play 1. e4
"ah yes mate in 58"
(game 3, 8:00)
I swear I've seen game 3 analyzed on this channel before
definitely
Yea the predict the blunder video
@@dew9103 no it was the announcing checkmate video
Fwiw, I liked both parts equally
Me too!
How do u see mate in 8 like what???!!
Legàl be like:-👨⚖️
Book and games
❤❤❤
Q-R5 not H4. Old Notation is Better.
Is it just me or on 36:47 man just ignored the d2 knight move?
Am i on live rightnow
Don't MIX Notation!!!
“Old” notation makes perfect sense, and is a lot more descriptive than the current system.
I would argue they are the same level of descriptiveness. Both describe the location on the board.
I like that with descriptive notation, we can keep track on the captured pieces much easier.
I prefer the old one.
Much more confusing.. it requires translating to where the pieces begin on the board, and the same square is referenced in completely different ways depending on the side.
@@timm439 the fact that you have to change your "view" with each move is the biggest annoyance and if you're a kid (like I was) it causes a ton of confusion
clickbait
This Guy Won By Only Moving Pawns 😲
Pawn one was pure disappointment xD
I love you, very deeply