Allyson and Corey's love child will be the next killer. Michael Myers will not be in the film by name. Simple concept and highly possible. The scene that shows Allyson leaving Haddenfield will be the first scene of the new film. She finds out she is pregnant, calls Laurie and tells her and of course Laurie is concerned because she believes that Corey was evil as well. Months later Laurie dies and Allyson goes to the funeral where she miscarraiges and dies later that night in the hospital. The baby is saved and of course goes up for adoption...The family that takes the baby lives in Haddenfield. The identity of the child is kept secret (per Halloween tradition). Six years later....HALLOWEEN REBIRTH. OR....You could show Laurie cleaning out her house because she marries the sheriff and is moving in with him. She can't find the mask that she kept after MM dies. The next Halloween Night the killings start again and you never know who is doing the killings. Is it Michael (somehow) or someone else....that could go on forever, never knowing the shape's true identity. If they want to keep this going they easily could.
Repetitive? I mean...on the surface, maybe. The most recent films make up a quadrilogy (as they include the original film) that quite literally has a different concept every single film. The OG, no one is aware of Michael and the first half of the film he doesn't even kill a single person. He just escapes, steals some supplies, and then stalks Laurie for the entire day. Then he then focuses on killing her friends and isolating her. In 2018, he escapes and immediately begins killing. Laurie is hypervigilant regarding him, and he roams town without any specific target in mind anymore. The next film, Michael is now done with subtlety and just goes on a pure rampage through town. Now the entire town is IMMENSELY fearful and paranoid as a result. They hunt him en masse. The final film...sucks. Michael is beaten down and in hiding. Makes no sense why when we literally saw him tank an entire mob and win in the previous film, but whatever. He also has an accomplice now. These movies are like making pasta. Sure you always have noodles...but you can change all the sauce, meats, herbs and spices to create a different dish every time. You're looking at a dish of shrimp Alfredo fettuccine and a plate of spaghetti with meatballs and claiming they're redundant.
@brendonw456 Ok, that's a good explanation tbf, but yeah I think Halloween ends was just so pointless, and another film would be aswell, unless they just do a total reboot which I wouldn't mind
@PLUTOXGOAT I will agree with a reboot, yes. Jamie Lee Curtis isn't getting any younger. And I also agree that Ends was pointless. But Halloween Kills AND Ends both spat on the original premise of this new timeline they introduced. Michael was supposed to be a regular human again. In Kills...they brought the supernatural crap RIIIIIIIIIGHT back. Couldn't even make it 2 full movies without doing it. I knew Ends was gonna be trash as soon as I saw the ending of Kills. The filmmakers showed us that they just blatantly lied to everyone when selling the previous film. And tbh, considering Kills was severely lacking in...plot...it was also a given that Ends was going to be a mess. It had to try to be 2 movies in 1 because of that. And that *always* goes over so well /s
@@brendonw456 Yeah very true, Ends and kills could've easily been one film that's also the thing about another Halloween film there isn't much of a plot to get another one unless it's a reboot of course
@PLUTOXGOAT Well...they do have...AN option to continue the series with the most recent timeline. It's a...terrible one, but it's there. Since they introduced the concept of Michael's "evil" transferring between people, they could just slap it in someone else and be good to go. People would hate it though. They already hated it in Ends. It does HAVE to be Myers under the mask. The only big slasher franchise that gets away with switching killers now is...Scream. Which is by mandate, since they're always regular humans (relative to horror standards) and they're always dead at the end. So yeah, I think they just need to remake the OG. Maybe set in the modern day...maybe still set in the late 70s. Whatever works
Michael Myers was not killed in Halloween Ends. It was a EMT😂
@@henrywallacesghost5883 🤣🤣🤣
Allyson and Corey's love child will be the next killer. Michael Myers will not be in the film by name. Simple concept and highly possible. The scene that shows Allyson leaving Haddenfield will be the first scene of the new film. She finds out she is pregnant, calls Laurie and tells her and of course Laurie is concerned because she believes that Corey was evil as well. Months later Laurie dies and Allyson goes to the funeral where she miscarraiges and dies later that night in the hospital. The baby is saved and of course goes up for adoption...The family that takes the baby lives in Haddenfield. The identity of the child is kept secret (per Halloween tradition). Six years later....HALLOWEEN REBIRTH. OR....You could show Laurie cleaning out her house because she marries the sheriff and is moving in with him. She can't find the mask that she kept after MM dies. The next Halloween Night the killings start again and you never know who is doing the killings. Is it Michael (somehow) or someone else....that could go on forever, never knowing the shape's true identity. If they want to keep this going they easily could.
@@jimmccarley8280 love this 👆🏻❤️
You can't add every other older sequel after the first movie into your take, because the sequel trilogy rendered them non-canon.
3 is actually pretty good. It’s its own thing.
H3 season of the witch is goated. Hated it as a kid bc there was no Michael but rewatching it as an adult I fell in love with it as a stand alone film
Michael Myers is the T1000, His mangled up remains will reconfigure on the way to the morgue
I guess the plot is "Evil dies tonight" for the 497, 865th time
I like these movies but they so damn repetitive 😭
Repetitive? I mean...on the surface, maybe. The most recent films make up a quadrilogy (as they include the original film) that quite literally has a different concept every single film.
The OG, no one is aware of Michael and the first half of the film he doesn't even kill a single person. He just escapes, steals some supplies, and then stalks Laurie for the entire day. Then he then focuses on killing her friends and isolating her.
In 2018, he escapes and immediately begins killing. Laurie is hypervigilant regarding him, and he roams town without any specific target in mind anymore.
The next film, Michael is now done with subtlety and just goes on a pure rampage through town. Now the entire town is IMMENSELY fearful and paranoid as a result. They hunt him en masse.
The final film...sucks. Michael is beaten down and in hiding. Makes no sense why when we literally saw him tank an entire mob and win in the previous film, but whatever. He also has an accomplice now.
These movies are like making pasta. Sure you always have noodles...but you can change all the sauce, meats, herbs and spices to create a different dish every time. You're looking at a dish of shrimp Alfredo fettuccine and a plate of spaghetti with meatballs and claiming they're redundant.
@brendonw456 Ok, that's a good explanation tbf, but yeah I think Halloween ends was just so pointless, and another film would be aswell, unless they just do a total reboot which I wouldn't mind
@PLUTOXGOAT I will agree with a reboot, yes. Jamie Lee Curtis isn't getting any younger.
And I also agree that Ends was pointless. But Halloween Kills AND Ends both spat on the original premise of this new timeline they introduced. Michael was supposed to be a regular human again. In Kills...they brought the supernatural crap RIIIIIIIIIGHT back. Couldn't even make it 2 full movies without doing it. I knew Ends was gonna be trash as soon as I saw the ending of Kills. The filmmakers showed us that they just blatantly lied to everyone when selling the previous film.
And tbh, considering Kills was severely lacking in...plot...it was also a given that Ends was going to be a mess. It had to try to be 2 movies in 1 because of that. And that *always* goes over so well /s
@@brendonw456 Yeah very true, Ends and kills could've easily been one film
that's also the thing about another Halloween film
there isn't much of a plot to get another one unless it's a reboot of course
@PLUTOXGOAT Well...they do have...AN option to continue the series with the most recent timeline. It's a...terrible one, but it's there. Since they introduced the concept of Michael's "evil" transferring between people, they could just slap it in someone else and be good to go.
People would hate it though. They already hated it in Ends. It does HAVE to be Myers under the mask. The only big slasher franchise that gets away with switching killers now is...Scream. Which is by mandate, since they're always regular humans (relative to horror standards) and they're always dead at the end. So yeah, I think they just need to remake the OG. Maybe set in the modern day...maybe still set in the late 70s. Whatever works
This is fake. A five second google search is all it takes....
You do realise Halloween Aftermath is an unofficial fan film?
@@azhorsley not according to IGN 🙏
@Axel.Williams ign has no credibility.
Halloween Aftermath is indeed a fan film created by my buddy James Grim.
She never destroyed the mask in Halloween ends
Michael Myers.. The greatest cinema character ever??
The amount of glaze Michael gets is hilarious😂😂
@@travisgames6608 sooo true! 🤣
cry about it
Just. Sat and wasted my time. This guy😂😂😂
This is a fan film, dude. Smh
It's a fan film stop saying it's blumhouse lol
If this story is an actual thing, the description says it will takeplace in between Kills and Ends.