DUNE Author Frank Herbert on Environmentalism. He Said This in the 70’s!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 лис 2021
  • Frank Herbert, author of the ‘DUNE’ science fiction series, discusses the importance of environmentalism in this 1977 interview with WTTW’s John Callaway.
    IMPORTANT! Secrets of Dune was the original uploader of this video. Tragically, he had to take this video down due to monetisation problems on his channel. I thought it was a shame that this video had to be taken down and so I decided to re-upload it. If you enjoyed this video, then like this video, comment down below, and subscribe to the channel! This helps the algorithm find my channel and videos and this makes it possible for me to create more DUNE videos in the future!
    Also, please go and subscribe to Secret of Dune's channel! He is one of the best Dune content creators and you won't be disappointed with his work.
    Secrets of Dune UA-cam Channel: / @secretsofdune
    Secrets of Dune Patreon: / secretsofdune
    Secrets of Dune Twitter: / secretsofdune
    Secrets of Dune Facebook: / secretsofdune
    Secrets of Dune Instagram: / secretsofdune
    If you haven’t read DUNE, order your copy today: This is the Dune reading order:
    DUNE US: amzn.to/2JyKHhP UK: amzn.to/2OhE9Tv
    DUNE MESSIAH US: amzn.to/2YkqtP UK: amzn.to/2M2e1xE
    CHILDREN OF DUNE US: amzn.to/2Ku5T5V UK: amzn.to/2M1FWxy
    GOD EMPEROR OF DUNE US: amzn.to/2YGYZ20 UK: amzn.to/2TaYnAU
    HERETICS OF DUNE US: amzn.to/2YHaI0D UK: amzn.to/2MIEdg6
    CHAPTERHOUSE: DUNE US: amzn.to/31jciaY UK: amzn.to/2Tep3kl
    #DuneUniverse #FrankHerbert #Environmentalism
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 84

  • @CosmicFaust
    @CosmicFaust  2 роки тому +43

    *IMPORTANT!* Secrets of Dune was the original uploader of this video. Tragically, he had to take this video down due to monetisation problems on his channel. I thought it was a shame that this video had to be taken down and so I decided to re-upload it. If you enjoyed this video, then like this video, comment down below, and subscribe to the channel! This helps the algorithm find my channel and videos and this makes it possible for me to create more DUNE videos in the future!
    Also, please go and subscribe to Secret of Dune's channel! He is one of the best Dune content creators and you won't be disappointed with his work.
    *Secrets of Dune UA-cam Channel:* ua-cam.com/channels/3Pjs49IEa_YSmYt3NH1ndw.html
    *Secrets of Dune Patreon:* www.patreon.com/SecretsOfDune
    *Secrets of Dune Twitter:* twitter.com/SecretsOfDune
    *Secrets of Dune Facebook:* facebook.com/SecretsOfDune
    *Secrets of Dune Instagram:* instagram.com/SecretsOfDune

    • @reasonerenlightened2456
      @reasonerenlightened2456 2 роки тому +1

      when we, I mean the wealthy, use it all up then there will be less humans to live with whatever remains.

  • @alinagodoroja
    @alinagodoroja 2 роки тому +80

    Frank Herbert was ahead of his time! He traveled the time from future to past. I am mesmerized by his vision. Dune Novels are a masterpiece

    • @Psalm144verse1
      @Psalm144verse1 Рік тому +2

      Yes, I agree. Like Dostoevsky and Jung and Nietsche ❤️

    • @squamish4244
      @squamish4244 Рік тому +3

      The first one anyway. The next two are worth reading if you're really into it and it does tell quite a story, just not as well.

  • @ammanbansal2265
    @ammanbansal2265 2 роки тому +40

    Now, I know I'm more than late to the conversation here, but while he's not here anymore... If anyone had to play Mr. Herbert in a biopic, I've always had this fascination that the late Robin Williams would play the famed author.
    I think he would have made a fantastic Frank Herbert.

  • @warrenbond32
    @warrenbond32 2 роки тому +55

    Man's incredible, I am Reading 📚 Dune again after 30 years, He was right in what He said about renewable energy to. Dune is one of the deepest and unique Novel's ever written. ❤

  • @deceiver444
    @deceiver444 2 роки тому +39

    I'm at a loss for words with Herbert. The scope of Dune keeps blowing my mind to this day. And to stay on topic with what Frank Herbert talks about at the end of this video : we're almost there. The party will be over soon.

  • @numptybuttercup6757
    @numptybuttercup6757 Місяць тому +11

    We have to start taking those steps now.... 50 years later >,>

  • @Tranxhead
    @Tranxhead 2 роки тому +116

    "I didn't react, I wanted to know." Ideological journalists of the 2020's, take note.

    • @RedPanda495
      @RedPanda495 11 місяців тому +7

      Journalism has always been ideological

    • @pro-choicemom
      @pro-choicemom 10 місяців тому +5

      Nothing wrong with being ideological, you just have to have the facts and proper context to back up your ideology.
      For example, being for energy independence while denying the science of the effect fossil fuel has on our environment. The facts don't back-up the insistence that we use a diminishing dirty resources rather than renewables which use our environment for energy.

    • @Awakeningspirit20
      @Awakeningspirit20 5 місяців тому +4

      Frank Herbert was one of those old-fashioned conservatives, a sage. Of course, I'd say today it's harder to get into as many fields as he did as education requirements have risen and tuition to get degrees to even get in the door skyrocketed, but it's still possible to do what he did. It's what I'm doing.

    • @leonardwachta7564
      @leonardwachta7564 3 місяці тому

      @@RedPanda495 maybe it was unfortunate. But it shouldn’t

    • @RedPanda495
      @RedPanda495 3 місяці тому

      @@leonardwachta7564 I definetly think it should, because without ideology you allow people with very dangerous ideologies to get a plataform

  • @deviandrianto
    @deviandrianto Місяць тому +2

    i'm here because _Dune_ and _Dune: Part Two_ are amazing movies, both worth for collected ❤

  • @williamking3301
    @williamking3301 2 роки тому +24

    Very interesting interview. Since the new movie came out (haven't seen it yet) my interest in the Dune Chronicles has been rekindled. Frank Herbert's vision of mankind's direction is very relevant to what is going on today. More of us should have listened to him. Subscribed.

  • @tuckernutter
    @tuckernutter Рік тому +16

    "We have 40 years of fossil fuels till it runs out"....... this came out around 40 years ago... Frank was warning us

    • @richieb74
      @richieb74 Рік тому +12

      That info was so unreliable at the time. We’re always finding more. And we have a projected 400 years left right now. Still amazing what he was able to come up with thinking we were running out in his lifetime. He created a warning for everyone in the form of a sci-fi novel. I’m a huge fan of his. Just a jack of all trades kind of guy that can make an amazing story knowing about a ton of different things.

    • @j.e.v.b394
      @j.e.v.b394 2 місяці тому

      @@richieb74 we dont have 400 years left of fossile fuels. Its hard to messure how much fossile fuels are left underground because you cant calculate what is undiscovered. however we do know how much is available on the surface. Because fossile fuels are worth so much we can expect there are great investments made by searching for more. So the ammount of available surface oil will rise and fall based upon the ease of finding new oil. Based upon knowing there is a limited supply people are able to calculate the curve of decline of the available oils with the amount of surface oil. Scientist have calculated that highest amount of oil supplies available peaked in 2006. Since then the amount of available oil on the surface has decline because it becomes much harder to get new oil. The harder it is to get to out the oil, the higher the enviromental and monetary costs are of oil. See the rise of current oil and fossile fuel prices right now as an example of that. In the future years it gets harder and harder to find new oil and the price of fossile fuels will increase exponentally. Till we fight eachother for the last drop. Google oil peak for more information about it.

  • @javionblade21
    @javionblade21 2 роки тому +15

    Man is a certified genius

  • @katjajentsch4276
    @katjajentsch4276 Місяць тому +1

    Wow!!!! He was ahead of his time! He wasn't a scientist but predicted and knew what would come and explained what was necessary already then and there to prevent global warming!!! I am stunned by his intelligence and genuine interest in so many topics and science fields! ❤

  • @giorgiomarte9131
    @giorgiomarte9131 10 місяців тому +4

    Amazing. And I never ever pictured OG Frank to sound like this!

  • @trumanshow162
    @trumanshow162 Місяць тому +1

    F. Herbert predicted environmental policies, oil shock, the Afghan war, or the war on terrorism.
    His “Dune” also reflected the growing concern about the health degradation with civilization.
    We are all getting abilities like Paul‘s genetic memory & prescience with the internet & AI.
    His question about “the sustainability of civilization” has become more significant than ever.

  • @dmhburque
    @dmhburque 2 роки тому +15

    Zach Galifianakis' father wrote Dune?

  • @finnmckeown7825
    @finnmckeown7825 3 місяці тому +10

    Wow, even in 2024 the end qoute sums up our climate crisis "sorry kids, we used it all up" Frank Herbert, sir, you are a genius

  • @joesmith4510
    @joesmith4510 Рік тому

    Everyone should listen with their mind, not their ears. Long live This channel, and Franks teachings.

  • @marquisdesade3025
    @marquisdesade3025 6 місяців тому +3

    I wish we’d listened

  • @ytubelord
    @ytubelord 2 роки тому +2

    WOWW

  • @vantage789
    @vantage789 Рік тому +4

    I’m becoming more convinced that Dune is also a religious text.

    • @MrDoctorMabuse
      @MrDoctorMabuse Місяць тому +1

      It is, and yet it also is not. It's part of a lifetime of pondering about the problems of human existence.

  • @Baamthe25th
    @Baamthe25th 2 роки тому +18

    Well, that 40 years figure was wrong. 45 years later, people are debating if we even passed the midway point (ie, peak oil), and it's not even the first time people claimed we passed it.
    If we're real, the issue isn't that there's little fossil fuel, it's that there's too much.

    • @derek96720
      @derek96720 Рік тому +9

      Exactly. It doesn't matter when we're going to run out of fossil fuels. We need to make the change and switch to renewables in the majority of fields that don't absolutely require it.

    • @Baamthe25th
      @Baamthe25th Рік тому +2

      ​@@derek96720 Kinda.
      Personally, I'm more in line with the IPCC who says we will need nuclear being deployed massively if we have any chance of being below 2°c.
      My idea is renewable everywhere they are really truly the best solution (If you've got lot of sun because yo'ure near the equator then put solar panels. If you've got river for hydro, do it. If you've got enough for wind pwoer like north sea, then 100% do it.) but since this won't be enough (especially if we've got to change all the transporation system from oil to electric, and likewise with heating, industry, etc) we shouldn't get dogmatic and try to force it everywhere else. For the rest of the demand that can't be filled with renewable, just use nuclear.
      Simple as that.
      I'm rather pessimistic for this happening, though, so I think we're going to get 2.5/3°c at least.
      Another thing is that my view is that fusion will be achieved eventually, and that's the true long term solution. I know the meme is that "Fusion is always 20 years away", but not only we already achieved it in fusion bombs (real funny how it's always quicker when it's for military purposes, eh... Seriously, kinda depressing), the timescale stayed the same because the investment stayed at basically nothing (Even projects like ITER are basically peanuts if we're serious) Anyway, if we've got a good nuclear infrastructure, then it will be easier to switch to fusion powerplants afterwards, so that's another reason to do it besides the emergency

    • @MuadDiiib
      @MuadDiiib Рік тому +3

      @@derek96720 every field of work on earth requires fuel to run. supply chains connect everything.

    • @toomanyaccounts
      @toomanyaccounts 6 місяців тому

      @@Baamthe25th solar power production creates radioactive lakes. fossil is still the cleanest fuel.

    • @sandal_thong8631
      @sandal_thong8631 6 місяців тому +1

      This may have been the time between the two oil crises. The real problem we have is global warming/climate change.

  • @mk1st
    @mk1st Місяць тому

    Notice he was right about switching to renewables, but for the wrong reason. He was worried about oil running out, which would have been great, but fracking and horizontal drilling have resulted in MORE fossil fuels. Getting off of a drug is more possible if the supply simply dries up.

  • @NoMastersNoMistress
    @NoMastersNoMistress Місяць тому

    "I'm curious!" ...and there it is. I just have a Bachelor's of Science myself, but I've been perpetually disgusted with how narrow post grad and fellow bachelors holders scan be.

  • @SevenHeadViper
    @SevenHeadViper Рік тому +3

    AI Drones are already being used by humans to war upon each other, The Hunter Seekers are already killing life.

  • @zero5496
    @zero5496 11 місяців тому +3

    Smart people are curious

  • @turtleanton6539
    @turtleanton6539 Місяць тому

    🎉🎉🎉🎉😮

  • @BiancaGomes_Martins
    @BiancaGomes_Martins 3 місяці тому

    Bah, esse cara era muito tdah das ideias, pra quem tem o transtorno e já leu um pouco sobre a vida dele (não querendo diagnosticar ninguém obv), mas vai perceber mts semelhanças de comportamentos haha

    • @n1lo676
      @n1lo676 2 місяці тому

      ele usava uns cogumelo sepá

  • @elroberto4051
    @elroberto4051 9 місяців тому +1

    Prophetic.

  • @traviscutler9912
    @traviscutler9912 Місяць тому +1

    If only we ran out of fossil fuels!

  • @jeremybrown-HelloJayBird
    @jeremybrown-HelloJayBird 2 роки тому +18

    50 years ago we were going to be out of fossil fuels in 40 years.

    • @lineseeking
      @lineseeking 2 роки тому +10

      haha exactly my comment. Overall he's libertarian tho... maybe eco-libertarian.

    • @robertryan399
      @robertryan399 2 роки тому +2

      as far back as the mid 2000s this was a common sentiment.

    • @derek96720
      @derek96720 Рік тому +3

      To be fair, we've found a LOT more oil since then. It's also irrelevant to the conversation of ecology, as running out of oil was just one impetus to researching renewable energy.

    • @jor3122
      @jor3122 Рік тому +2

      @@derek96720 "found" is doing a lot of work in that sentence

    • @hubertfarnsworth6824
      @hubertfarnsworth6824 Рік тому +1

      He did say give or take 10 years

  • @sandal_thong8631
    @sandal_thong8631 6 місяців тому +1

    The original _Dune_ had a subtext of restoring the desert planet to what it might have once been with water and green growing things. That would make it less habitable for the sandworms and sandtrout and reduce the supply of melange-spice. But though they did restore the environment by the fourth book (except for one large, confined desert) they lost the worms. Whatever his environmental vision for Dune in the 1960s, it didn't seem relevant or desirable by the fourth book. There's even some question to whether the worms were natural to Dune or introduced, as the latter was said in one of the books, but seem impossible to do for other planets at the time.

  • @drrd4127
    @drrd4127 2 роки тому +1

    He is an author! Obviously, he reads alot.

  • @jffryh
    @jffryh 2 місяці тому

    So I guess his politics was of the Arnold Schwarzenegger/Teddy Roosevelt variety of Republican

  • @scottmccrea1873
    @scottmccrea1873 2 роки тому +5

    Frank was seriously impressed with himself. I'd kind of forgotten this.

    • @magneto44
      @magneto44 Рік тому +19

      I didn’t get that impression at all, he just seems incredibly self-aware and gives credit to others when due

  • @surfacegr1nder705
    @surfacegr1nder705 Місяць тому +4

    This interview must have been done at the height of “peak oil”. This didn’t age well.

    • @CitizenScott
      @CitizenScott Місяць тому +1

      The only based comment on this vid

  • @darkstar223
    @darkstar223 3 місяці тому +1

    This is rubbish, where is the full video?

  • @DirtyWopBastard
    @DirtyWopBastard 7 місяців тому +2

    Look, his books were great and all but he said we would run out of oil 15 years ago, I think we should just let artists stick to art

    • @bjarczyk
      @bjarczyk 2 місяці тому

      Not like we listen to actual peer reviewed science anyways. We need artists specifically because most people don’t care what science says.

    • @DirtyWopBastard
      @DirtyWopBastard 2 місяці тому +2

      "science" as it is now days, mostly just consensus, a vote if you will, has been wrong a lot and continues to be so. You need artists to promote propaganda and call it science. @@bjarczyk

  • @chorizobear8447
    @chorizobear8447 4 місяці тому

    I didnt know Bobby Fischer wrote Dune

  • @laserwolf65
    @laserwolf65 2 роки тому +7

    No offense to Mr. Herbert, but the US Federal Government has been saying "there's only a few decades of oil left" since the 1800s. Now, I agree that renewables are where we should've gone and where we should go now. I'm simply saying "the Federal Government says" is a really shitty argument.

    • @derek96720
      @derek96720 Рік тому

      Yet every decade people latch onto "official" statements as fact, so long as it pushes their agenda. I remember reading government PSA's about how raising the number of women in the armed forces raises our combat effectiveness, despite there being zero evidence to support that. In fact, there are studies that showed mixed-sex or all-female units perform SUBSTANTIALLY worse than all-male units. Gender equality is a good thing to aim for, but not when it comes to life or death situations. Now here we are on the tail end of COVID, and I've honestly lost track of the CDC statements that were later contradicted by themselves.

    • @TreeRegime
      @TreeRegime 3 місяці тому +3

      That's why he said, "Now let's just assume their figures are correct." He was taking their words as an example of the importance of this issue, not regurgitating the government.