RTS players figured out this strat a long time ago. It's called a "Zerg Rush" or "Zerging." Something small, fast, and nimble deployed in massive numbers but are also not a heavy economic loss when destroyed on the battlefield. All we need is a centralized intelligence that can autonomously direct and guide the swarm on what kind of objectives to pursue and in which order to pursue these objectives.
@@oompalumpus699 ROFL, I think you'll find the military have been using a variation of this tactic for quite some time. seen it done myself. i served in the British military for 22 years ;)
You got that bass ackwards, bucko. Everything, every shenanigans that's half useful, will get repurposed for military industry. Especially if you're fighting a war of national survival like the Brits in the 40s or Ukraine today. So yeah, do learn weird shit. It might just save your life and way of life.
The drone with ghetto ak is exactly what I thought was going to happen once cheap drones were ubiquitous, but the thermite drone was not on my bingo card. Holy crap that thing is just spewing thermite.
It’s the opposite for me, I figured that thermite and flammable nonsense would be the logical progression because guns are unwieldy why stick gun to delicate flying nonsense
@@artemiscrimson Attaching a gun or grenade are both pretty low hanging fruit tho, a small fpv drone spraying thermite is a lot more engineering. I don't think I could figure it out.
@Justin_Taylor He'll need resources straight away. Once his AO is secured, I suggest he attack North to the beard-balm oil fields of lower Kyrgyzstan. I wish him luck and would like to be the first to welcome our well coiffed and properly moisturized overlord.
The industry is so driven by incredible amounts of money that very few of them give a thought even to the potential for anything bad to happen. Even AI safety experts are winding back their positions - not because anything is becoming more safe, but because there is no money in safety and so much in pursuit of new and more powerful features or even just current implementations from companies paying vast sums to keep up with their peers. There's also a sizeable dose of "bad things only happen to other people".
@@MachineMan-mj4gj Worse is that video of your spleen flying through the air with heavy phonk in the background had been a viral sensation, yet your relatives get neither royalties from it, nor compensation from the state.
Just so you all know when it's 2029 and we're all fighting in the Battle of Beijing when a drone spots us I'm gonna drop that "now all of China knows we are here" quote from Mulan.
Anything Americans can do Australians can do better and cheaper. We don't have any choice, Australia is the 6th largest country in the world but only has a population of around 27 million and over two-thirds of us live on the eastern coast. I live in South Australia and we only have a population of around 2.5 million and over 2 million live in Adelaide.
@@BFB_tg It did not. Only Russian ZALA/Lancet drones and a few Gerans claimed Ukrainian airplanes, with Gerans/Shaheeds having Air2Air kill vs 2 mig 29s and one F-16 (yes, a pilot would sneakup behind a Geran destroy it, but then the debrees would end the fighter jet).
nah. war is horrific. the ways in which it is horrific are changing, but thats always been the case. find me a "nice" war. its horrific when someone beats another human to death whith their bare hands. its horrific when a multi million dollar system kills someone.
At this point, yes. The other episode with that depressed social media girl too. I mean fiction has to make sense to be entertaining, reality just happens
Look up tarantula hawks. They aren't hawks at all, they are the world's largest wasp species that prey on tarantulas to lay their eggs inside of. Their stinger is the size of the entire body of smaller wasp species.
The hornet would utterly r*pe the tarantula hawk. I mean sure the hawk has a mean stinger but it has like no jaw. Have you fucking seen the Japanese hornets jaws? It'll chomp that fucking thing in two!
One interesting low cost drone designed by a western power that has a decent track record is the Australian designed fixed wing cardboard drone. The cardboard is treated to be water resistant, is lightweight, low cost, easy to assemble in the field, & has more range than the typical quadcopter type drones. The aircraft is inexpensive so more can be spent on the guidance system & munitions.
Also, because it's cardboard and not a metal alloy, it's apparently next to impossible to detect it on radar. Downside is that they are super light and more or less inoperable even in relatively modest winds.
@@WarfokiThis would be an interesting project for engineering college competition. Years ago they had challenges like egg drop survival or front loader laundry balancing algorithms. Shaping a cardboard aircraft to be a powered glider that is more tolerant to crosswinds would be an interesting challenge. The operation of the engine could be interrupted to save fuel & increase loiter time while gliding. There may be some defense companies willing to sponsor this.
The real horror will begin once they start rolling out the autonomous drones. For example: The sniper drone: Technically not a drone since it is stationary. Placed in a location with a good field of fire. Has sensors to measure wind, detect heat signatures, cameras with image recognition that can spot even a small part of the human body or any piece of military kit from over a kilometer away. When enemies enter its murder zone it will evaluate the targets, sort them according to priority, and generate a firing solution that lets it kill most, if not all, of the enemies in a rapid fire volley of precision shots. Once things get spicy it will switch to engage any movement or heat signature in its murder zone, so anyone who pops their head up to look for it will already have a round with their name on it sent by the time they have started looking. The landmine hunter killer drone: Either hand placed or launched from artillery this drone shoots several thin tripwires out in a wide area around itself. When triggered this small drone equipped with a ten round gun and explosive device will take of like an angry hornet, fly around shooting anything human like that moves, and when out of bullets it will find anything that looks like a nice target and crash into it before exploding. Imagine have to do foot patrols through a forest littered with these things. I could probably think up more nightmare machines, but I don't want to feel responsible when someone inevitably makes one of the damn things.
Usually a sniper has to reposition quickly after taking a shot or two to avoid getting sniped himself. It would make more sense to have a sniper gun on a flying drone - or maybe it lands on a roof for taking a shot and then just flies over to the next?
Personally I think autonomous drones are about as ethical as a anti-personnel mine. A to whom it may concern sort of deal. There is a big difference between the two, one you have to touch for it to maim you, the other will look for you to maim you. But if you don't prosecute people for putting mines in the ground if a kid steps on it, I don't see how you prosecute a guy for pressing the ON button on a drone. Also I think "autonomous" is a buzz word today but we had this before. There are naval mines that were a anchor mine with a guided torpedo attached to it. The sensor would detect a ship and launch a torpedo at it.
Most countries are party to the Ottawa Convention that makes the use of anti-personnel mines illegal. The US, Russia and China (and others) aren't but generally most countries have banned them. Also: the fact that drones are looking for you means they can be dangerous in a lot of places mines can't, e.g. your living room.
The fact those drones can look for you means everything. What if you are a civilian that it thinks is a hostile? What if you're a hostile but you have civilians nearby and killing you means killing them? What if you're surrendering? What if you're guarding with a bunch of POWs around you? What if you're near an important piece of infrastructure such as a dam or a power plant? What if you're near a bunch of highly lethal chemicals that if breached could carry on the wind and poison a town over? The problem with machines is that they are only dubiously good at carrying out what you tell them to at the best of times and are either terrible at or incapable of considering the random, messy factors of life that would give a decision-making human pause. There's a lot to be afraid of there. Now would you hold the soldier who sent the drone responsible for its screw-up? Maybe depending on the circumstance? But honestly you're right that you probably wouldn't and that alone is a huge problem, as again it touches on an accountability issue with these weapons. There's so much that can happen and so many ways a nation and its military can shrug off responsibility with an "oops" and a lol.
The part where you wonder how the AI/drones will recognize that the enemy is surrendering reminded me of that scene in Robocop when the guy gets turned into Swiss cheese by that prototype (btw I found your channel recently and I think its great!)
(Enforcement Droid) ED-209: "Please put down your weapon. You have twenty seconds to comply. / ... You are in direct violation of Penal Code 1.13, Section 9. ... Four... three... two... one... I am now authorized to use physical force!"
It won't work until we have generalized AI, at which point the ethics of constructing a human level intelligence for the sole purpose of killing humans is going to be a bigger issue.
being ground infantry already sucks so much. my big question is that when drones start becoming more and more prevalent will they eventually make ground infantry obsolete/more of a sucicide mission than it already can be at times? At what point does it become more costly to equip an soldier with a gun and send them running into a swarm of drones than it is to strap an explosive or rifle to a drone with ir and a rifle/grenade. Will war completely have the human element removed until one or both sides run out of drones? like when two technologically-able world powers fight eachother, will the drone on drone warfare act as a buffer before actual humans have to fight? surely it will just delay the start of the war. Like imagine if you will in the future, turning in your tv to check on the war, 20 years ago you would already be fighting at this time, but right now the drone front is taking the brunt it the aggression, your side has just gained 20% more airspace and is slowly pushing forwards, you grimace realizing that when the enemy gets pushed back far enough to allow for foot-soldiers to be effective, you realize that the soldiers will have to deal with the still massive amounts of defensive reserve drones. Like fighting against a meatgrinder both ways. wait for your drones to clear a small portion of land before advancing, even then there is always the possibility you get domed or exploded from farther than you can hope to possibly return-fire, you may be able to take out one or two with a interference/net gun or shotgun, but there always seems to be another drone to take its place.
Black ops 2 is just becoming real. Global tensions are rising Technology in the game is starting to be feasible 2025 is only a few months away We might get a woman president for 2025, black ops 2 had a woman president when it takes place (2025)
Speaking of new types of warfare, has anyone noticed that the cybertruck is basically already a ground based kamikaze drone with a 1 ton incendiary warhead built in from the factory? With full drive by wire & rudimentary FSD, all it would take is a single software update to unlock! Can you imagine if they were popular in Lebanon - we might've already seen this in action
Given the Ukraine war and the modification of seemingly innocuous devices to inflict damage, this type of speculation is important. What is the "likelihood" a bad actor would do this? It becomes a part of the cyber warfare problem.
Similarly, all the planes on 9/11 were fly-by-wire 737's with an autopilot written in C. Then, in a couple of months, the US had fleets of autonomous Boeing drones over Afghanistan.
@@lc3853 my understanding is the autopilot & flight computer are properly air-gapped, not capable of receiving online updates, so even if that were true it would've been a different attack that required hands-on modification. Also they were 767's not the smaller 737.
Fun fact: old sovet hand antitank granades (ркг3), that was forgotten on military depots, and was ineffective due to throwing aspect even by soviet doctrine, now became a very serious weapon against modern tanks, thanks to drones.
People know and don’t care about it. The people running the show just care that their pockets are fat and they have a place in power when the AI overlord takes control. It’s funny that people don’t believe that the creator exists yet these same people are willing to create one
Honestly, CoD was unironically my introduction when it comes to drone use in warfare. Then the war on Ukraine happened and I've been getting clips of both Russians and Ukrainians getting blown up by grenade-dropping drones. Then I started readng more Black Powder Red Earth and I learned about the Switchblade drone. I swear, were a few decades away from deploying actually androids into combat...
Theres an original star trek that i always thought probably got it right. Computers warred internally and people recieved death notices after. They were to report to a biotissue recycling center to be processed. They accepted this new type of war because it was less destructive and you had a chance to say goodbye to loved ones before reporting for recycing.
@hazel5092 I dunno... i stopped watching tv a long time ago and have no idea what those things are. Lol. I think war hammer is a game? Death metal band?
@@andrewbrown6522 it’s a rather grim dark Sci-Fi setting that’s like 40years old by now, however this startrek concept is oddly disturbing to me as someone who regularly reads Warhammer, I’d rather read Black sun, dead sky again xD
I saw a presentation a few years ago of a cargo plane flying over a city, and a swarm of small drones flew out, each equipped with a shaped charge, each finding an "enemy" and flying straight into their face
Wow. I remember reading a Retired General's warning about this exact problem over 50 years ago. It has been pretty obvious that this is the inevitable direction technology has been going, even before we had the ability to do it. And fifty years later no one has figured out the ethics of the whole thing. What I secretly love is how these $500 hobby drones are proving effective against these billion dollar weapon systems, leaving the contractors to explain what we got for our money. If the MIC didn't own so much of the government, they'd have some real explaining to do before they got another dime.
We have had things that kill without human intervention since the first time some guy made a hole in the ground and covered with branches expecting something to fall inside. Mines are also weapons used without human intervention. Drones and loitering munition are mostly the same thing
Yes but, as the other commenters pointed out already, no. The matter is scale, speed, and threat. You have a minefield in front of you, ok that's bad, but that minefield isn't going to move at all. Now imagine that minefield seeing you from byond horizon and fly to meet you personally in the face.
with the US military industrial complex, i bet we aren't able to manufacture large numbers of cheap disposable drones. that would require manufacturing our own electronics and plastic stuff cheaply while somehow being profitable.
It wouldn't even be expensive. It's more of a matter of will. If an order for 5 million drones over the next X years were made, ordering the plastic pellets and doing the electronics in-house wouldn't even be that complex. The problem is the "hmmm you're contracted to make 5,000" and now you have to hike up the unit cost to recoup oj the investment. Drones don't need the latest chips. Even Russia has a chip fab. They're garbage if compared to modern desktop CPUs. But to guide a missile? It's perfectly viable. The US has chip fabs that can do weaker components.
Oh we totally could. Imagine if Lockheed Martin and Raytheon just spent All day making FPV drones. If Ukraine can make 30-40k FPVs (according to Perun’s research), out of garages and shacks, then imagine what the world’s largest MIC could do in a month!
The point that nobody mentions is that these weapons are basically within reach of everybody with a little technical knowledge and a 3d printer, state or private entity. No going back from here, the genie is already out of the bottle.
Multiple Skynets, of varying sizes and capacities. Every nation will need to compete or contribute to a defensive pact. If this sounds absurd to anyone else reading this, think about how responsibilities will increasingly be handed over to AI systems. I'd also add that over a relatively short time, the number of people who monitor or even know how those systems work will go to zero.
@@kyneticist The understanding of the system going to 0 is what I worry about the most. Making it entirely autonomous will be the outcome. Then someone will hack it and use it against it's citizens. Or it will pull a terminator.
@@kyneticist this is already a issue a perfect example being old military vehicles from WW1 not a single person living now knows the reason for most things in old vehicles in fact this is a problem in academic fields like science where alot of older scientists didn’t really take much notes so we have the answers but no one really knows how the guy got there in its entirety you can also ask any software engineer or any person who works on mechanical equipment repair because due to the age of most mechanical equipment most equipment is basically in a stagnant state of just being repaired but never improved so much so that you’re basically coming in n trying to repair something based on someone else’s already completed work but like multiple times over
Its simple, the ones who are most softhearted with their restrictions lose. Ai weapons become the new MAD, and warfare becomes increasingly dangerous to conduct, especially as an aggressor
Even worse, what happens when Bob in his shed decide to strap a gun to his 3d printed drone and use it on a crowd because he's angry about the mailman.
dude! thank you for the information and your presentation. Im an fpv pilot, I build and fly my own quadcopters, Its the most amazing fun you could ever have...most of the videos on this topic almost spread fear of drones in general, thank you for not making fpv not look so bad and actually being knowledgeable. 🤘🤘🤘
I have really bad attention issues But everytime I see your or cappys video, I can watch em from end to end without even getting distracted. It tickles my tism as a certain man would say 😂😂
Wanna feel the psychological horror of being a civilian during a never ending arms race? Read the short story ”Foster, you’re dead!” By PKD. Then call your parents and tell them you love them and thank them for trying their best. Keep up the great work dude!
i wonder if copper thermites have been investigated for this, it would produce a more intense stream than iron thermite. also, i wonder if we will see drone launched napalm or drone mounted flamethrowers.
Did a CJTF rotation in 2021 as an air traffic controller and was designated as "drone watcher" and airspace liaison. 12 hrs a day, 7 days a week on a FAAD agregator, drove me ,my crew and the staff into perpetual drone strike paranoia. Big army is way behind on in terms of CUAS doctrine and capabilities. I wouldn't wish that job on my least favorite joe lmao.
It's interesting to think of time when war is purely an economic struggle. Military targets are the means of production, and the way one side beats the other into submission is by bleeding their economy of resources and its population the will to continue funding the war. I think we're already there in some sense, given the Chinese area denial strategy of "more cheap rocket make American sad", but the rapid adoption of COTS drones is certainly accelerating this trend.
Funny how the Ukrainians were calling it a war crime when Russia used WP or that gas grenade dropping drone a few weeks ago. Guess they're all war criminals at heart.
Drone swarms might not be ethically safe enough to be used on people or even vehicles yet but they could already be a nightmare for AA radar and jamming systems. Radars, radar blinders or dazzlers and radio/wifi signal jammers all work by emitting very specific wavelengths which can easily be distinguished by various types of sensors. Drones like this would only need to know what direction the enemy is in, where their area of free operation is defined, and they could be let loose. Radars, AA guns and missile emplacements, jammers, etc are already free game and already have anti-radiation self-guiding munitions like AGM-88s lobbed at them regularly. The difference is that drones are extremely cheap, can be carried long distances in common commercial vehicles and due to their small size and low cost could be launched in waves to saturate and overwhelm defenses which might otherwise be able to survive one or two larger missiles. In hotter peer conflicts stealth aircraft could drop containers full of them deep behind enemy lines to degrade their AA coverage and radar warning long before higher investment incursions. Ukraine is already demonstrating that for both sides having degraded air coverage has been a serious concern, and that radar and radio jamming is an extremely valuable capability which will seriously hamstring any fighting force that loses it. So my prediction is that the first really high-impact use of drone swarms will be for SEAD.
not bad thinking but honestly not hard to counter with things like a pepperpray dispenser, good old 12g birdshot/buckshot or electric shock deterrence and id imagine most birds leave the vicinity if they hear gunfire and explosions nearby. also its not hard to build a cheap fixed wing drone that can outpace any bird.
AI doesnt fail. It does what the code decides. Its just that we fail at understanding the algorithm, and as such it can do things we didnt account for. But its not failing anymore than a falling boulder who "failed" to land on a village, killing everyone. It just follows gravity, AI follows the algorithm.
@@fish5671 I'm a Gnostic atheist, something that is a far greater contradiction, but its an inside joke in the secular sciences of religion. Gnosticism is dualistic (spirit/matter) so I am both a spiritual person and an atheist at the same time, for the lols. The symbol I am using is the spiritual anarchy symbol, reversed. Its all very edglelord. Listen, I was a young student once, I just didnt bother update my account ;)
That s essentialy all wars. Most are waged for the interests of a couple billionaires. Now crowd funding allows even the average joe to participate and think himself a billionaire 😅
@@etienne8110 yup people forget the world wars some of the worst wars in human history was basically funded by private citizens ell even ancient wars in human history has always been funded by the citizens in some way shape or form
I thought there was a line drawn since the 90s; There has to be a human in the loop at all times. Sad that there are so many people revising that rule. Thermite drones are the thing of nightmares, but one guy is on the other side going "blyat!!" and that makes it war. It is terrible and terrifying? Sure, but watchagonado? About hunter-seeker swarms trawling the countryside for victims, I can only paraphrase marshall Bosquet "c'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas la guerre".
It blew up ammo which caused death through all the shrapnel flying around. It also burns the troops clothing and everything around them making it really hard for those soldiers to take it out before they die.
0:34 Ghetto rig AK is of limited utility. Probably useful more as a distraction to make people think they’re being assaulted from a different direction than an actual weapon. Even with a drum, how many rounds would it hold and what is the trade off on performance and/or loiter time? And even if it has a decent ammo capacity, how good are the sights/ stabilisation? 99% of the time, you’d be better off with more battery power or advanced sensors to help spot for arty.
1:15 😂 Well played. If there's one thing I've been thoroughly conditioned to eye roll at by UA-cam (aside from imbedded 'Better Help' ads), it's the tendency of commentators to start their recaps circa The Big Bang.
we *do* currently have the ability to tie an aimbot to some fancy image parsing software and make fully automated hunter-killer drones (flying or otherwise, otherwise is honestly _worse_ since they're dead silent and have loiter times in the months). to the best of my _very_ limited knowledge the aimbot part is straight up good enough to shoot bullets out of the air if you've got it hooked up to something that returns information to it fast enough (has been for decades, these days even the stuff someone makes in their garage off of youtube how-too videos is easily that good though attaching it to something like the directional radar on a CWIS so it can actually aim at a bullet isn't exactly something you can do in your garage) but the image parsing isn't doing to hot on making drones shoot at a specific uniform or somesuch. works wonders for just shooting anything human-shaped in a designated region and does nearly as well at shooting people based on skintone or funnily enough *hairstyle* of all things.
The US was testing rocket propelled quad copter like drones in the 90s. If they didn't drop the ball they are 20 years ahead, just like they were with the nighthawks.
Australia has already started producing very cheap drones that are designed to be disposable, they are made from a special cardboard that is weatherproof and they are flat packed for easier storage and transportation. They have been used in Ukraine for suicide attacks on tanks, artillery, surface to air missile systems and aircraft. They are undetectable by radar and have been designed to be as quiet as possible.
I kinda got stuck on the footage shown and concept of a mortar-launched drone. - Folding flight surfaces are required, which increases cost, complexity, and failure rates. It also means the flight surfances are less consistent and requires a better computer to compensate. (That last part may not be as true because some flexibility can be exploited for self-correcting features.) - Mortars are heavy and require three people to operate. They paint a target on your back, are slower to deploy than hand-launching, and require a minimum clearance of obstructions that also make you an easy-to-spot target. - Mortars use explosives, making a loud sound to draw enemies to your position, and also further increasing deployment cost and complexity because you need the drones as ammo and explosives as ammo. It also means they have a higher detonation risk while in storage. It also means the drones have to be heavier and less efficient to withstand the shock of launching them, which lowers their range and loiter time. Is there any benefit at all for mortar-deployed drones at all? I can't think of any, and the footage shown seems to indicate the mortar systems can't even give them a very good boost in initial firing, so does it even give speed to deployment or range? I don't think it does? Or at least, not enough to make up for all the downsides.
Moral of the story; military tactics and strategy are going through an existential crisis because of little flying death machines
History repeats itself. This is our goofy weapons ghetto rigged to bi-planes era
Strategy and tactics? they are absolutely fine. Ethics and humanitatian law on the other hand...
RTS players figured out this strat a long time ago. It's called a "Zerg Rush" or "Zerging."
Something small, fast, and nimble deployed in massive numbers but are also not a heavy economic loss when destroyed on the battlefield.
All we need is a centralized intelligence that can autonomously direct and guide the swarm on what kind of objectives to pursue and in which order to pursue these objectives.
@@oompalumpus699”All we need is fucking Skynet” U a little nuts man?
@@oompalumpus699 ROFL, I think you'll find the military have been using a variation of this tactic for quite some time. seen it done myself. i served in the British military for 22 years ;)
my freshman year engineering project was making a quad copter. Didn't realize my training for the military industrial complex started that soon.
You got that bass ackwards, bucko. Everything, every shenanigans that's half useful, will get repurposed for military industry. Especially if you're fighting a war of national survival like the Brits in the 40s or Ukraine today.
So yeah, do learn weird shit. It might just save your life and way of life.
Compartmentalization eliminates guilt. Drone salesmen are collecting the whole kill chain into one box.
As an Engineer, your training for the MI complex started as soon as you decided to be an engineer.
Everything we make gets weaponized eventually.
You never thought of the other possible uses for a drone copter?
It started when your mom bought you video games and your dad left and the gov gave your mom extra money to not remarry.
The drone with ghetto ak is exactly what I thought was going to happen once cheap drones were ubiquitous, but the thermite drone was not on my bingo card. Holy crap that thing is just spewing thermite.
You posted exactly what I was thinking too.
It was on mine for naval combat. But not dropping it like that.
You can put way more dangerous things than thermite... Imagine irritant chemicals or just... Flees.
It’s the opposite for me, I figured that thermite and flammable nonsense would be the logical progression because guns are unwieldy why stick gun to delicate flying nonsense
@@artemiscrimson Attaching a gun or grenade are both pretty low hanging fruit tho, a small fpv drone spraying thermite is a lot more engineering. I don't think I could figure it out.
The Marines having a Campaign of Learning is a joke that writes itself.
Marines eat their learning one color at a time!
Laugh all you want the attack plan drawn in crayon will work unexpectedly well
@@reggienotorious6824
A man who eats crayons can ruck all day....To get more crayons...To ruck, more crayons...Ruck... Crayons...
....I DON'T KNOW 😅
I think it’s kinda cute how easy it was to trick the marines into thinking we’re being endearing when we call them stupid
@@xIQ188xYou’re not? I’m being endearing.
The true terror will come when Justin's mustache becomes self-aware and tries to conquer Asia.
It’s gonna start in Turkmenistan and then go from there
@@Justin_Taylor hmm. a good choice.
@Justin_Taylor He'll need resources straight away. Once his AO is secured, I suggest he attack North to the beard-balm oil fields of lower Kyrgyzstan. I wish him luck and would like to be the first to welcome our well coiffed and properly moisturized overlord.
@@Justin_TaylorBro dropped into Turkmenistan like it's Fortnite 💀
@@Justin_TaylorI'm going to recommend going around Afghanistan 😉
Seems like the response of military AI developers boils down to "We hope things won't end badly"
I think this has devolved into a "We know things will end badly - let's hope we are not on the wrong end of this."
As one of these devs I watch Battlestar Galactica and pray for the best, because baby we are going in hard, fast and blind
@@nickyevdokymov5526 Can you make a secret backdoor just for yourself to use, tell no one, keep it subtle.
Just so everyone is aware my bet is on either the men of iron rebellion or ultron
The industry is so driven by incredible amounts of money that very few of them give a thought even to the potential for anything bad to happen. Even AI safety experts are winding back their positions - not because anything is becoming more safe, but because there is no money in safety and so much in pursuit of new and more powerful features or even just current implementations from companies paying vast sums to keep up with their peers. There's also a sizeable dose of "bad things only happen to other people".
Man-made horrors WITHIN our comprehension? LET'S GO!
yeah it's definitely worse than napalm and indiscriminate artillery fire
@@АскольдМакарук "Man the mosquitos are really buzzing toda-" Oops, you have suddenly exploded.
I find the horrors within our comprehension more terrifying.
@@MachineMan-mj4gj Worse is that video of your spleen flying through the air with heavy phonk in the background had been a viral sensation, yet your relatives get neither royalties from it, nor compensation from the state.
Thermite doesn't stick to kids, at least
But fpvs do neeeeooooooww 💥.
I had forgotten about the running cadence you're referencing. Thanks for that nostalgia.
We're working on it.
I believe it simply burns through and out...uughh
@@danielescobar7618That’s my tax dollars hard at work!
It's just like a biblical swarm of locusts, not with added C4 and the ability to tell 1000 artillery crews your exact GPS coordinates
Is this what The Bible meant
@@hhhhhhhhh1071maybe
Biblically accurate locusts
Just so you all know when it's 2029 and we're all fighting in the Battle of Beijing when a drone spots us I'm gonna drop that "now all of China knows we are here" quote from Mulan.
@@hhhhhhhhh1071no
billions must fly drones, war has fallen...
gime me drone you give me drone you give me drone
Hahahahaha was looking for this comment
Americans: high-tech composites made via the most advanced manufacturing processes available.
Australians: Angry Pizza Box. This is not a joke.
And the one that claimed a plane too already!
Anything Americans can do Australians can do better and cheaper. We don't have any choice, Australia is the 6th largest country in the world but only has a population of around 27 million and over two-thirds of us live on the eastern coast.
I live in South Australia and we only have a population of around 2.5 million and over 2 million live in Adelaide.
@@itt2055 Ken oath.
Yeah khant fellow Aussie here
@@BFB_tg It did not. Only Russian ZALA/Lancet drones and a few Gerans claimed Ukrainian airplanes, with Gerans/Shaheeds having Air2Air kill vs 2 mig 29s and one F-16 (yes, a pilot would sneakup behind a Geran destroy it, but then the debrees would end the fighter jet).
we are DONE for
nah. war is horrific. the ways in which it is horrific are changing, but thats always been the case. find me a "nice" war. its horrific when someone beats another human to death whith their bare hands. its horrific when a multi million dollar system kills someone.
Heh.. drone for
-a beached whale observing a rapidly approaching tactical ballistic RFK Jr
(1994, colorized)
The High-Powered Antenna in my backyard, blasting Purple Haze onto the Command/Control channel:
congrats ur the first comment !!!!
So, Black Mirror was really a documentary. What a time to be alive
Fiction is reality leaking the script ahead of time
@@aquireeverything9382 damn, im gonna steal that, thats a cool line
@@aquireeverything9382fuck, including furry porn fiction?
At this point, yes. The other episode with that depressed social media girl too. I mean fiction has to make sense to be entertaining, reality just happens
I know, I'm obsessed with getting my best friend to make out with me
I'm already freaked over the sound of wasps! Drones sound like monster-sized wasps!
Am also freaked out by wasps and bebês and consodering the whey their wings work they are literaly micro death drones
Look up tarantula hawks. They aren't hawks at all, they are the world's largest wasp species that prey on tarantulas to lay their eggs inside of. Their stinger is the size of the entire body of smaller wasp species.
@@davidgreenwood6029 I just did. Imagine pitting a fight between the Tarantula hawk wasp vs. Asian giant hornet. Place your bets!
The hornet would utterly r*pe the tarantula hawk.
I mean sure the hawk has a mean stinger but it has like no jaw.
Have you fucking seen the Japanese hornets jaws? It'll chomp that fucking thing in two!
Interesting video, not as much thermite drone as the title "Guess We're Doin Thermite Drones Now" would suggest.
yeah. i wish it had a diffrent title.
I can't wait for real life Manhacks😍😍
Iiii have a crowbar!
the right man in the wrong place can make all the difference in the world
HAAAAAAAX
Like the little firefly drone designed to fly through a window and explode? Just put a little mower blade underneath it and set it to "blend" mode
Gordon?!
Aaa-
One interesting low cost drone designed by a western power that has a decent track record is the Australian designed fixed wing cardboard drone. The cardboard is treated to be water resistant, is lightweight, low cost, easy to assemble in the field, & has more range than the typical quadcopter type drones. The aircraft is inexpensive so more can be spent on the guidance system & munitions.
yeah, I think the inventor actually made the prototype on a bet to see if he could make a drone out of a pizza box.
Also, because it's cardboard and not a metal alloy, it's apparently next to impossible to detect it on radar.
Downside is that they are super light and more or less inoperable even in relatively modest winds.
@@WarfokiSort of like a powered glider?
@@kenandbarbie-b6c Basically, yeah.
@@WarfokiThis would be an interesting project for engineering college competition. Years ago they had challenges like egg drop survival or front loader laundry balancing algorithms. Shaping a cardboard aircraft to be a powered glider that is more tolerant to crosswinds would be an interesting challenge. The operation of the engine could be interrupted to save fuel & increase loiter time while gliding. There may be some defense companies willing to sponsor this.
It's not a war crime if it's the first time
For some people the accountability gap might be the whole point.
That was the real theme of the video.
Gun Drones? Thermite Drones? Can't wait for Disassembly Drones to be deployed.
I get the reference!
Nice
So basically real life vulture droids that attach themselves to vehicles/machinery and sabotage it
We should make Worker Drones first though.
@@LouisWeaver-m4j Well, I mean, Disassembly Drones are basically just Worker Drones but with a demo version of an eldritch virus.
The real horror will begin once they start rolling out the autonomous drones. For example:
The sniper drone:
Technically not a drone since it is stationary. Placed in a location with a good field of fire. Has sensors to measure wind, detect heat signatures, cameras with image recognition that can spot even a small part of the human body or any piece of military kit from over a kilometer away. When enemies enter its murder zone it will evaluate the targets, sort them according to priority, and generate a firing solution that lets it kill most, if not all, of the enemies in a rapid fire volley of precision shots. Once things get spicy it will switch to engage any movement or heat signature in its murder zone, so anyone who pops their head up to look for it will already have a round with their name on it sent by the time they have started looking.
The landmine hunter killer drone:
Either hand placed or launched from artillery this drone shoots several thin tripwires out in a wide area around itself. When triggered this small drone equipped with a ten round gun and explosive device will take of like an angry hornet, fly around shooting anything human like that moves, and when out of bullets it will find anything that looks like a nice target and crash into it before exploding. Imagine have to do foot patrols through a forest littered with these things.
I could probably think up more nightmare machines, but I don't want to feel responsible when someone inevitably makes one of the damn things.
I want more nightmares, please.
Sniper drone was already a thing in Afghanistan, and it was not stationary. Granted, a Reaper is way bigger than these cheap quad copters.
Usually a sniper has to reposition quickly after taking a shot or two to avoid getting sniped himself. It would make more sense to have a sniper gun on a flying drone - or maybe it lands on a roof for taking a shot and then just flies over to the next?
Your sniper drone has already been in service for years. South Korea has had "sentry guns" along the DMZ for more than a decade called the SGR-A1.
Personally I think autonomous drones are about as ethical as a anti-personnel mine. A to whom it may concern sort of deal.
There is a big difference between the two, one you have to touch for it to maim you, the other will look for you to maim you.
But if you don't prosecute people for putting mines in the ground if a kid steps on it, I don't see how you prosecute a guy for pressing the ON button on a drone.
Also I think "autonomous" is a buzz word today but we had this before. There are naval mines that were a anchor mine with a guided torpedo attached to it.
The sensor would detect a ship and launch a torpedo at it.
Most countries are party to the Ottawa Convention that makes the use of anti-personnel mines illegal. The US, Russia and China (and others) aren't but generally most countries have banned them.
Also: the fact that drones are looking for you means they can be dangerous in a lot of places mines can't, e.g. your living room.
The fact those drones can look for you means everything. What if you are a civilian that it thinks is a hostile? What if you're a hostile but you have civilians nearby and killing you means killing them? What if you're surrendering? What if you're guarding with a bunch of POWs around you? What if you're near an important piece of infrastructure such as a dam or a power plant? What if you're near a bunch of highly lethal chemicals that if breached could carry on the wind and poison a town over? The problem with machines is that they are only dubiously good at carrying out what you tell them to at the best of times and are either terrible at or incapable of considering the random, messy factors of life that would give a decision-making human pause. There's a lot to be afraid of there.
Now would you hold the soldier who sent the drone responsible for its screw-up? Maybe depending on the circumstance? But honestly you're right that you probably wouldn't and that alone is a huge problem, as again it touches on an accountability issue with these weapons. There's so much that can happen and so many ways a nation and its military can shrug off responsibility with an "oops" and a lol.
The part where you wonder how the AI/drones will recognize that the enemy is surrendering reminded me of that scene in Robocop when the guy gets turned into Swiss cheese by that prototype (btw I found your channel recently and I think its great!)
(Enforcement Droid) ED-209: "Please put down your weapon. You have twenty seconds to comply. / ... You are in direct violation of Penal Code 1.13, Section 9. ... Four... three... two... one... I am now authorized to use physical force!"
It won't work until we have generalized AI, at which point the ethics of constructing a human level intelligence for the sole purpose of killing humans is going to be a bigger issue.
@@MrDj232I don't think it's that hard of a problem. I think GPT 4 would be most of the way there if you could fit it into a drone.
@@RillianGranthow the fuck is that supposed to work
@@green5260 it supports images. Am I missing something that is really hard here?
being ground infantry already sucks so much. my big question is that when drones start becoming more and more prevalent will they eventually make ground infantry obsolete/more of a sucicide mission than it already can be at times? At what point does it become more costly to equip an soldier with a gun and send them running into a swarm of drones than it is to strap an explosive or rifle to a drone with ir and a rifle/grenade.
Will war completely have the human element removed until one or both sides run out of drones? like when two technologically-able world powers fight eachother, will the drone on drone warfare act as a buffer before actual humans have to fight? surely it will just delay the start of the war.
Like imagine if you will in the future, turning in your tv to check on the war, 20 years ago you would already be fighting at this time, but right now the drone front is taking the brunt it the aggression, your side has just gained 20% more airspace and is slowly pushing forwards, you grimace realizing that when the enemy gets pushed back far enough to allow for foot-soldiers to be effective, you realize that the soldiers will have to deal with the still massive amounts of defensive reserve drones. Like fighting against a meatgrinder both ways. wait for your drones to clear a small portion of land before advancing, even then there is always the possibility you get domed or exploded from farther than you can hope to possibly return-fire, you may be able to take out one or two with a interference/net gun or shotgun, but there always seems to be another drone to take its place.
They'd probably still be fielded alongside drones, it's what happened when the machine gun was invented.
no. infantry will just have to change, like it has with every single previous new weapon.
It doesn't matter how many aircraft you have, to take land you have to stand on it eventually.
They made black ops 2 hunter killer drones a real thing
Black ops 2 is just becoming real.
Global tensions are rising
Technology in the game is starting to be feasible
2025 is only a few months away
We might get a woman president for 2025, black ops 2 had a woman president when it takes place (2025)
@@FireIGuess I wanted to have a remaster of Black Ops 2 but not in this way.
@@FireIGuess we still don’t have a Raul Menendez type of figure (yet).
Or eggman drones
@@TheLegitAlpha Punished Prigozhin when?
Speaking of new types of warfare, has anyone noticed that the cybertruck is basically already a ground based kamikaze drone with a 1 ton incendiary warhead built in from the factory? With full drive by wire & rudimentary FSD, all it would take is a single software update to unlock! Can you imagine if they were popular in Lebanon - we might've already seen this in action
Didn't Elon just remotely shut off a warlords kill dozer cybertruck
Given the Ukraine war and the modification of seemingly innocuous devices to inflict damage, this type of speculation is important. What is the "likelihood" a bad actor would do this? It becomes a part of the cyber warfare problem.
@@becauseforeverended8861yup he did exactly that, then said warlord cried on twitter or something, 2024 is a fever dream
Similarly, all the planes on 9/11 were fly-by-wire 737's with an autopilot written in C. Then, in a couple of months, the US had fleets of autonomous Boeing drones over Afghanistan.
@@lc3853 my understanding is the autopilot & flight computer are properly air-gapped, not capable of receiving online updates, so even if that were true it would've been a different attack that required hands-on modification. Also they were 767's not the smaller 737.
Fun fact: old sovet hand antitank granades (ркг3), that was forgotten on military depots, and was ineffective due to throwing aspect even by soviet doctrine, now became a very serious weapon against modern tanks, thanks to drones.
RKG-1600 modernization had the old parachute removed and replaced with fixed fins, exactly to allow for more precise drops from drones
We are literally training SkYNET
except Marines are controlling the terminators.
Scary concept.
As long as we don’t give AI the possibility to seize the means of production, we’re fine.
@@CW11721 at this rate they'll make the means themselves
People know and don’t care about it. The people running the show just care that their pockets are fat and they have a place in power when the AI overlord takes control. It’s funny that people don’t believe that the creator exists yet these same people are willing to create one
Honestly, CoD was unironically my introduction when it comes to drone use in warfare. Then the war on Ukraine happened and I've been getting clips of both Russians and Ukrainians getting blown up by grenade-dropping drones. Then I started readng more Black Powder Red Earth and I learned about the Switchblade drone.
I swear, were a few decades away from deploying actually androids into combat...
Nah, people caught on the street are basically free 😢
Theres an original star trek that i always thought probably got it right. Computers warred internally and people recieved death notices after. They were to report to a biotissue recycling center to be processed. They accepted this new type of war because it was less destructive and you had a chance to say goodbye to loved ones before reporting for recycing.
As a warhammer fan, why is it always startrek that makes me feel sick? That’s more disturbing then Tyranids, or the Daemonculaba
@hazel5092 I dunno... i stopped watching tv a long time ago and have no idea what those things are. Lol. I think war hammer is a game? Death metal band?
@@andrewbrown6522 it’s a rather grim dark Sci-Fi setting that’s like 40years old by now, however this startrek concept is oddly disturbing to me as someone who regularly reads Warhammer, I’d rather read Black sun, dead sky again xD
Victory at the cheapest price: man or machine are just resources.
I saw a presentation a few years ago of a cargo plane flying over a city, and a swarm of small drones flew out, each equipped with a shaped charge, each finding an "enemy" and flying straight into their face
"We doing Black Ops 2 now"
Black Ops 2 Remake💀💀💀
Wow. I remember reading a Retired General's warning about this exact problem over 50 years ago. It has been pretty obvious that this is the inevitable direction technology has been going, even before we had the ability to do it. And fifty years later no one has figured out the ethics of the whole thing.
What I secretly love is how these $500 hobby drones are proving effective against these billion dollar weapon systems, leaving the contractors to explain what we got for our money.
If the MIC didn't own so much of the government, they'd have some real explaining to do before they got another dime.
They had drones using mini flame throwers on wasp nest a long time ago.
We have had things that kill without human intervention since the first time some guy made a hole in the ground and covered with branches expecting something to fall inside.
Mines are also weapons used without human intervention.
Drones and loitering munition are mostly the same thing
Most countries have banned the use of land mines on the basis that they often hurt the wrong people.
@@MrQuantumInc do you know which countries arent included in those "most countries"
But nobody has proposed making a drone out of nukes and chickens.
@@MrQuantumIncthose countries havent been invaded or at war in decases.
I think the term is “luxury beliefs”
Yes but, as the other commenters pointed out already, no.
The matter is scale, speed, and threat.
You have a minefield in front of you, ok that's bad, but that minefield isn't going to move at all.
Now imagine that minefield seeing you from byond horizon and fly to meet you personally in the face.
What a time to be an engineer
Drones the size of flies, with deadly chemicals/poisons.
This shit is why aliens don't visit us.
Unless I can mate with them they can stay in their little flying saucers on Mars.
Aliens would have to go through something similar before they become space faring species so they should understand what we're going through.
Yeah, the aliens were all destroyed by their own drones millennia ago.
@@Justin_TaylorHell yeah brother!
@@69KazeshiniUnless if they were a gestalt consciousness from the get go
Prequel to the Forever Winter.
Corpse Tank would be around next year I guess.
Imagine having molten metal poured on your head, that's basically what these thermite drones are doing.
When they're AI autonomous with facial recognition.. things get more fun.
Somewhere in Quantico, Virginia:
“Sir, what if we Shot a drone…”
“…”
“Out of a Mortar”
“……….. I’m listening”
You know Switchblade exists, right?
with the US military industrial complex, i bet we aren't able to manufacture large numbers of cheap disposable drones. that would require manufacturing our own electronics and plastic stuff cheaply while somehow being profitable.
It wouldn't even be expensive. It's more of a matter of will.
If an order for 5 million drones over the next X years were made, ordering the plastic pellets and doing the electronics in-house wouldn't even be that complex. The problem is the "hmmm you're contracted to make 5,000" and now you have to hike up the unit cost to recoup oj the investment.
Drones don't need the latest chips. Even Russia has a chip fab. They're garbage if compared to modern desktop CPUs. But to guide a missile? It's perfectly viable. The US has chip fabs that can do weaker components.
Oh we totally could.
Imagine if Lockheed Martin and Raytheon just spent All day making FPV drones.
If Ukraine can make 30-40k FPVs (according to Perun’s research), out of garages and shacks, then imagine what the world’s largest MIC could do in a month!
US can just buy it from there allies
@@nobodyherepal3292But no-one could take from the middle.
@@j100j the middle of what?
The point that nobody mentions is that these weapons are basically within reach of everybody with a little technical knowledge and a 3d printer, state or private entity. No going back from here, the genie is already out of the bottle.
a powerful state government wont have a real problem controlling that tbh. it will increase the power of "unaccountable" non state actors.
Soon we'll have battle droids
Begun, the Drone Wars have
B1 battle droids are on the horizon, but still no progress on lightsabers or hyperdrives smh
whats wild is there are dudes building more capable drones in their garage or basement than some of these militaries are fielding.
lets not get morals get in the way of profits. thats unamerican.
don't forget to add the shape of that mustache to the list of mistakes
Well now how is that supposed to make me feel?
@@Justin_Taylorlike shaving. 😅
This was exactly what I thought would happen. Skynet WILL happen.
Multiple Skynets, of varying sizes and capacities. Every nation will need to compete or contribute to a defensive pact. If this sounds absurd to anyone else reading this, think about how responsibilities will increasingly be handed over to AI systems. I'd also add that over a relatively short time, the number of people who monitor or even know how those systems work will go to zero.
@@kyneticist The understanding of the system going to 0 is what I worry about the most. Making it entirely autonomous will be the outcome. Then someone will hack it and use it against it's citizens. Or it will pull a terminator.
@@kyneticist this is already a issue a perfect example being old military vehicles from WW1 not a single person living now knows the reason for most things in old vehicles in fact this is a problem in academic fields like science where alot of older scientists didn’t really take much notes so we have the answers but no one really knows how the guy got there in its entirety you can also ask any software engineer or any person who works on mechanical equipment repair because due to the age of most mechanical equipment most equipment is basically in a stagnant state of just being repaired but never improved so much so that you’re basically coming in n trying to repair something based on someone else’s already completed work but like multiple times over
"Drone bietter" - Vanko, Ivan
Its simple, the ones who are most softhearted with their restrictions lose. Ai weapons become the new MAD, and warfare becomes increasingly dangerous to conduct, especially as an aggressor
Even worse, what happens when Bob in his shed decide to strap a gun to his 3d printed drone and use it on a crowd because he's angry about the mailman.
dude! thank you for the information and your presentation. Im an fpv pilot, I build and fly my own quadcopters, Its the most amazing fun you could ever have...most of the videos on this topic almost spread fear of drones in general, thank you for not making fpv not look so bad and actually being knowledgeable. 🤘🤘🤘
I have really bad attention issues
But everytime I see your or cappys video, I can watch em from end to end without even getting distracted.
It tickles my tism as a certain man would say 😂😂
It's because he's so handsome
Wanna feel the psychological horror of being a civilian during a never ending arms race? Read the short story ”Foster, you’re dead!” By PKD.
Then call your parents and tell them you love them and thank them for trying their best.
Keep up the great work dude!
Thermite drones sounds like some shit from the bayverse transformers
Imagine your sitting in your trench and the last thing you hear are 100s of giant bees
i wonder if copper thermites have been investigated for this, it would produce a more intense stream than iron thermite. also, i wonder if we will see drone launched napalm or drone mounted flamethrowers.
we will 100% see drones with flamethowers
I mean, I literally saw a video of a home-made drone mounted flamethrower being used to burn out wasp nests...
@@Warfoki yeah its entirely doable, i just wonder if it is worth it.
Did a CJTF rotation in 2021 as an air traffic controller and was designated as "drone watcher" and airspace liaison. 12 hrs a day, 7 days a week on a FAAD agregator, drove me ,my crew and the staff into perpetual drone strike paranoia. Big army is way behind on in terms of CUAS doctrine and capabilities. I wouldn't wish that job on my least favorite joe lmao.
The main takeaway of this video is A2Ad could just be called A3D
AAAD
Oh, boy, Creative's not gonna like this.
@@Justin_Taylor Pronounced, of course "aaaaaaaaaaaaard."
This makes sense to hit a convoy. You simply fly and disperse thermite on a line and all the vehicles are doomed.
anything in that convoy made if magnesium would be a spectacular fire
Skynet is coming
I am more scared that the Marine Corps is getting more intelligent and actively learning than being melted to death by thermite drone
It's interesting to think of time when war is purely an economic struggle. Military targets are the means of production, and the way one side beats the other into submission is by bleeding their economy of resources and its population the will to continue funding the war. I think we're already there in some sense, given the Chinese area denial strategy of "more cheap rocket make American sad", but the rapid adoption of COTS drones is certainly accelerating this trend.
A purely economic struggle mulching people and infrastructure in the area. Right
@@georgiykireev9678 people are just temporarily illiquid assets
Cold war espionage never ended
Ok so 10,000 long range mini whoops programmed to swarm incoming armed drones who wants to help me make this real?
You have to think of the thermite drones as providing a free hot shower to Russian soldiers stuck in the cold.
Funny how the Ukrainians were calling it a war crime when Russia used WP or that gas grenade dropping drone a few weeks ago. Guess they're all war criminals at heart.
Drone swarms might not be ethically safe enough to be used on people or even vehicles yet but they could already be a nightmare for AA radar and jamming systems. Radars, radar blinders or dazzlers and radio/wifi signal jammers all work by emitting very specific wavelengths which can easily be distinguished by various types of sensors.
Drones like this would only need to know what direction the enemy is in, where their area of free operation is defined, and they could be let loose. Radars, AA guns and missile emplacements, jammers, etc are already free game and already have anti-radiation self-guiding munitions like AGM-88s lobbed at them regularly.
The difference is that drones are extremely cheap, can be carried long distances in common commercial vehicles and due to their small size and low cost could be launched in waves to saturate and overwhelm defenses which might otherwise be able to survive one or two larger missiles.
In hotter peer conflicts stealth aircraft could drop containers full of them deep behind enemy lines to degrade their AA coverage and radar warning long before higher investment incursions.
Ukraine is already demonstrating that for both sides having degraded air coverage has been a serious concern, and that radar and radio jamming is an extremely valuable capability which will seriously hamstring any fighting force that loses it. So my prediction is that the first really high-impact use of drone swarms will be for SEAD.
may i show you the perfect counter for these small drones?
BEHOLD!!
TERRITORIAL BIRD
not bad thinking but honestly not hard to counter with things like a pepperpray dispenser, good old 12g birdshot/buckshot or electric shock deterrence and id imagine most birds leave the vicinity if they hear gunfire and explosions nearby. also its not hard to build a cheap fixed wing drone that can outpace any bird.
@@Serenchronodipity they were talking about hovering drones not plane drones
however you do have a point with gunfire
Behold, the drone equipped with an birdshot 20 gauge shot gun….
@@nobodyherepal3292 obviously the shotgun is fired by soldiers on the ground.
AI doesnt fail. It does what the code decides. Its just that we fail at understanding the algorithm, and as such it can do things we didnt account for. But its not failing anymore than a falling boulder who "failed" to land on a village, killing everyone. It just follows gravity, AI follows the algorithm.
ins't being agnostic and atheist at the same time a contradiction
@@fish5671 His name says Gnostic, not Agnostic.
@@fish5671 I'm a Gnostic atheist, something that is a far greater contradiction, but its an inside joke in the secular sciences of religion. Gnosticism is dualistic (spirit/matter) so I am both a spiritual person and an atheist at the same time, for the lols. The symbol I am using is the spiritual anarchy symbol, reversed. Its all very edglelord. Listen, I was a young student once, I just didnt bother update my account ;)
We can’t always know how it will respond to unique / unaccounted for situations though.
I welcome our new drone overlords as I am released of this mortal coil in a fiery explosion sparing me from the rest of the horrors of man's creation.
Your use of the term "bad guys" should be changed to "other guys" based on most of our recent conflicts.
Adversaries or opposition forces
Semantics. The other guy is always the bad guy.
"Bad guy" isn't a moral thing, it just means adversary. Dumbing it down to kids' language is incredibly common in the military.
Dunno, russians look pretty much like bad guys
Wrong the best way to win a argument is thermite drone
Gotta trim those nostril hair landing strips. Gotta
A chat between you and Ryan McBeth about this should be very interesting.
One for the Algorithm:)
That must be so fucking scary to see hear multiple drones buzzing then you turn around and see a drone with a bomb charging at you
Am i the only one that has a serious moral issue with private citizens essentially crowd funding a foreign war?
I think so
That s essentialy all wars.
Most are waged for the interests of a couple billionaires.
Now crowd funding allows even the average joe to participate and think himself a billionaire 😅
Not the only one
@@etienne8110 yup people forget the world wars some of the worst wars in human history was basically funded by private citizens ell even ancient wars in human history has always been funded by the citizens in some way shape or form
aww man i was down for a refresher on the wright brothers!
I thought there was a line drawn since the 90s; There has to be a human in the loop at all times. Sad that there are so many people revising that rule.
Thermite drones are the thing of nightmares, but one guy is on the other side going "blyat!!" and that makes it war. It is terrible and terrifying? Sure, but watchagonado?
About hunter-seeker swarms trawling the countryside for victims, I can only paraphrase marshall Bosquet "c'est magnifique, mais ce n'est pas la guerre".
If it makes you feel better from what ive heared the termite didnt kill anyone there
The attacks after the vegitation burned down however
It blew up ammo which caused death through all the shrapnel flying around. It also burns the troops clothing and everything around them making it really hard for those soldiers to take it out before they die.
0:34 Ghetto rig AK is of limited utility. Probably useful more as a distraction to make people think they’re being assaulted from a different direction than an actual weapon. Even with a drum, how many rounds would it hold and what is the trade off on performance and/or loiter time? And even if it has a decent ammo capacity, how good are the sights/ stabilisation?
99% of the time, you’d be better off with more battery power or advanced sensors to help spot for arty.
Soon. Drone swarm operators will play RTS game mode.
Already happening.
"Prayer, Mr. Saavik. The drones don't take prisoners"
1:15 😂 Well played. If there's one thing I've been thoroughly conditioned to eye roll at by UA-cam (aside from imbedded 'Better Help' ads), it's the tendency of commentators to start their recaps circa The Big Bang.
we *do* currently have the ability to tie an aimbot to some fancy image parsing software and make fully automated hunter-killer drones (flying or otherwise, otherwise is honestly _worse_ since they're dead silent and have loiter times in the months).
to the best of my _very_ limited knowledge the aimbot part is straight up good enough to shoot bullets out of the air if you've got it hooked up to something that returns information to it fast enough (has been for decades, these days even the stuff someone makes in their garage off of youtube how-too videos is easily that good though attaching it to something like the directional radar on a CWIS so it can actually aim at a bullet isn't exactly something you can do in your garage) but the image parsing isn't doing to hot on making drones shoot at a specific uniform or somesuch. works wonders for just shooting anything human-shaped in a designated region and does nearly as well at shooting people based on skintone or funnily enough *hairstyle* of all things.
If the guys who made ghetto AK drone had a bit more of time, they could spin the barrel 90° they could have an extra sight
god if only they could have called off France before it happened...
The US was testing rocket propelled quad copter like drones in the 90s. If they didn't drop the ball they are 20 years ahead, just like they were with the nighthawks.
And nuclear weapons aswell people forget we have the best MIC in human history currently
Just found your videos, these are great and your humor is excellent good work!
Enjoying your videos!!!! Thanks dude!
Australia has already started producing very cheap drones that are designed to be disposable, they are made from a special cardboard that is weatherproof and they are flat packed for easier storage and transportation. They have been used in Ukraine for suicide attacks on tanks, artillery, surface to air missile systems and aircraft.
They are undetectable by radar and have been designed to be as quiet as possible.
Drones are the modern day technical
No fucking way “LAS-5 ‘Guard Dog’ Rover” from the hit game “Helldivers 2”
But on a more serious note, that is fucking terrifying.
I kinda got stuck on the footage shown and concept of a mortar-launched drone.
- Folding flight surfaces are required, which increases cost, complexity, and failure rates. It also means the flight surfances are less consistent and requires a better computer to compensate. (That last part may not be as true because some flexibility can be exploited for self-correcting features.)
- Mortars are heavy and require three people to operate. They paint a target on your back, are slower to deploy than hand-launching, and require a minimum clearance of obstructions that also make you an easy-to-spot target.
- Mortars use explosives, making a loud sound to draw enemies to your position, and also further increasing deployment cost and complexity because you need the drones as ammo and explosives as ammo. It also means they have a higher detonation risk while in storage. It also means the drones have to be heavier and less efficient to withstand the shock of launching them, which lowers their range and loiter time.
Is there any benefit at all for mortar-deployed drones at all? I can't think of any, and the footage shown seems to indicate the mortar systems can't even give them a very good boost in initial firing, so does it even give speed to deployment or range? I don't think it does? Or at least, not enough to make up for all the downsides.
“War…. War, has changed”
-Old Snake
(Nanomachines)
Doesn’t matter who we are or where we are we’re all cooked
This is exactly the type of absolutely gloreous shit I expected when we first figured out (personal) drones.
Remember kids it’s never a war crime the first time
A good thoughtful video about the developmet and dangerous, scary, and useful possibilities of drones. An eye openr. Thanks!