Watched this video in 2021, decided to get Mono Poly ... wondered why I'd been so convinced, then realized how much it matters to run these things through reverb and delay. Then a friend got the Poly D, which convinced me to get one as well. "Get both" was evidently the best answer. Now I'm watching this again :)
@@JohnTrasher -- It's not GAS if I actually use them ... right? please say that's right :) I did get the Poly D via trade for a handful of Volcas, so it was actually a *reduction* of gear ... at least, until the next wave of Behri releases in November. Anyway: thanks for your helpful video, which I will now be re-enacting at home.
@@VeloVios - wouldn't it be great if I had a good answer to that? But I didn't find the Poly D rewarding for me and traded it away, and neither has made it into a track for me. MP still highly interesting for its modulation possibilities
Jooooooohn!!! Hands down you have to be the man right now on youtube for being the first one to put those 2 synths next to each other. Not even Behringer has those bragging rights. Lol. Great video. On behalf of all the Behringer synth enthusiasts, thank you very much. Keep it coming.
Thank you so much for putting together a comprehensive video showing the differences. I ended up just getting the Poly-D because the knob interface/layout just looks more intuitive and better laid out.
Yeah i miss him now... i did a Video of them playing together : ua-cam.com/video/Pso0t1W4Zn4/v-deo.html I had to decide between them due to lack of space
MonoPoly. OSC sync opens up the possibilities & not having it on any synth limits all modulations(except filter & PW) to very tiny knob turns or you're unable to play in tune.
Thank you!! Just what I was looking for... Is there one you like more? They both seem to compliment each-other when played together. The Poly D has lots of character and warmth, and the MP has lots of bite and energy.
If you only have 700€ to spend i would go with the poly D bc of the chorus and distortion/moogysound. I already used it in all of my own songvideos here if you want to check it out. I used it mainly for bass Riffs. The MP has some other fields it excels, especially with the fm/fx section you can make really aggressive Sounds. The pwm is also a cool feature for more komplex/changing arp Sounds like in the beginning of this video :)
For sure! I sat with mine on the factory for a day. But the cutoff seem to really not be that sensitive and jump from a muted to open sound fast. Now I have it up to 20khz, giving it more room to fine dial in. I def recommend at least setting it to 15khz. It’s a very nice synth, and something that I could grab basics right away. But the fx section is where I’m learning a bit more daily. If you spend enough time with some effects. You can make some really leads! The organ sound is impressive as well for dark moody stuff. I have a model d. I’d say the Monopoly for me works in a band setting for indie rock stuff. The model d does as well..but not as easily. I spend a good amount of time getting the model d sound I want crafted. The Monopoly, you can kinda run with it out the box....if not getting crazy with the effects.
I kept mine as well... :) however, i still miss the sound of the monopoly which i used in this video together with the poly d ua-cam.com/video/Pso0t1W4Zn4/v-deo.html
thank you for this comparison. i think behringer's were very good in both cases. they gave the right sound to both instruments. the monopoly has the personality of the korg while the poly d is Moog. thanks again. now i know what to buy!
@@JohnTrasher in my case the poly d. I did not want to clarify it before because in a short comment it did not seem correct. both machines are valid and the differences that you have highlighted allow each one to understand which is the most appreciated sound. korg has a more "oriental" sound, more refined on the treble, Moog is "fat" like American cars ...
.... with Korg you can be more "bad" and express more grit. with Moog you can explore a softness and an unmatched expressiveness. this is my opinion. I am a 60 year old amateur and recently started playing keyboards again. I'm struggling to learn the final part of Keith Emerson's Lucki Man ....
Watching your comparison I would think the Poly D has warmer sound than the Monopoly but this one offers more versatility to control the sound, both are awesome machines 😍, whats your conclusion of the utility for both?
Which one do you like more after working with them for a while?. I find both sound good, but somehow the Monopoly sounded a bit warmer to my ears, while the D a bit fatter.
Thank you for this review/comparison! I have been looking into getting a "solo" synth for my stack and I wondered how these two would compare as they seem to have similar superficial attributes. For my part, I think I will go toward the Poly D. While I'm sure I might experiment with the para-polyphony, I'm mostly interested in the mono sound and features. I wonder: has anyone compared the Poly D to the Behringer Model D? Polyphony notwithstanding, I suspect the Poly D might still win my affection. I'm only speaking for myself, of course. Again, thanks for doing this much-needed comparison.
Thanks, glad i could help! ua-cam.com/video/Pso0t1W4Zn4/v-deo.html at 42 seconds the monopoly begins to play melody along with the poly D, doing things the poly can't do.
What do you think about some people saying these are the same synth just with different looks? I kind of want both but I don’t want them both if they’re the same synth.
well in its core, they are both 4 OSC paraphonic subtractive synths. So they have a lot in common and overlap quite much. However they differ in the FX section... MonoPoly is more flexible in PWM sounds (variable width modulation, LFO controlled) and has a FM feature. If money and space is not an issue, get both, otherwise i would go for the poly d... but i liked the FM sound on the MP as well... ua-cam.com/video/Pso0t1W4Zn4/v-deo.html here u can listen what i mean (starting 0:42)
I just received my Monopoly, and the keybed is less soft than that of my poly d. Especially the white keys are so soft on my poly D. Way better on my Monopoly
I'll check later again, but to me the Keybed felt really the same. I got both synthesizers of the first production batch, maybe later versions were built differently (but i wouldnt think so)... overall they are okayish, and suitable for the purpose. I got an Electric Piano with wooden keys when i want to play really expressive... :)
The Poly D seems warmer & fatter, Mono/Poly seems brighter, and a bit harsher, but both possess desirable qualities. Given that both can be had for less than the cost of a single modern synth, I'll likely have the lot! My only gripe is lack of desktop models -- how many short, mediocre keybeds do I really need in my tiny studio? That's why I bought ONE expensive MIDI controller...
Honestly, you could probably use either as long as you know how to program well. I think the MonoPoly has a better sound for that kind of music, but thats just my opinion.
@@sedrickvalistar107 i have heard of an issue that the oscs are Not calibrateted. So the spread across the keybed isnt konsistent. U could check by playing the lowest note and only listen to each osc solo and if they stay in tune on the highest note (again cycle thru each osc seperatly)
Yeah. A lot of people make these type of videos with low voice level. I try to watch quietly, without headphones, but then the music get blasted too loud after trying to listen to the voice. I'll just use headphones next time.
Ni man. Love Monopoly but pdas are great on the Poly D but the last pad on Monopoly wow ! Do you also have as many problems with tuning the poly D as many complain ?
@@JohnTrasher Ok I hear everyone complaining. Anyway I preferred the Korg but the weak point that I was sorry that it doesn't have an external audio in for external audio while the moog does or am I wrong? I like to pass digital things into analog circuits
@@manuelsirotti9340 yeah i mean the poly d... i did another Video with both of them where the monopoly sounds really nice, however i kept only the poly d
Never owned the Matrixbrute. Its basically presets and 3 DCO vs no presets and 8 VCO. The mod Matrix on the Matrixbrute is superior ofc. I wanted a pure analog synth to understand what all this knobs actually do
@@davecjd yeah, i use the poly D in my songs for my bass as well. Take a listen to the bassline in this Song if you like: ua-cam.com/video/XcJKQArTaPM/v-deo.html
For a newbie i would recommend neither because u cannot save/store presets. Then i would say they both are pretty similar. The poly d requires some 6.3mm patching capabilities for Aftertouch which i liked. I would go which sound u like most if presets arent an issue
Exactly what i was looking for , Unless my hearing is a lot worse from club Djing they sound pretty similar ?will end up with both sooner or later but didnt know which to get first.since the MonoPoly is on sale atm i think i will jump on it PeaceFromOZ
As for me ... the Poly D wins. I agree I've being excited about the MonoPoly but when hearing the comparison, I prefer the Poly D ... maybe it´s because there is more "Moog" in the sound.
I believe monopoly velocity is MIDI out only and no aftertouch at all? Having both as onboard destinations as with poly d is an unfortunate omission IMHO.
@Rhizosphere my assessment is if you can't afford and actual moog, get the poly d for the moog sound but grandmother isn't much more and is a way more capable synth, to me the mono/poly is more interesting modulation wise than the poly d.
@Rhizosphere Grandmother is great even without using modular, it's just a great rock solid sounding bass synth with a really nice sequencer/arpeggiator and spring reverb, the patching is just an added bonus.
@Rhizosphere, yeah I had both and I can say that while they both sound amazing I am more likely to grab a Grandmother again than a Matriarch. The raw sound of the Matriarch is great, just as good as Grandmother but Grandmothet feels more immediate to use. I really don't dig parphonic, it doesn't work with the way I want to play and so I tend to think of synths as either Poly or Mono and forget the paraphonic aspect because I just don't find it something I use all that much, and for the money and a mono I prefer the grandmother. Alot of things about the way the Matriarch was done I find frustrating, the way they implemented global settings for one. I sold both and got a Moog One, the raw sound isn't the same but it is absolutely a fantastic and capable synth that is well laid out and super intuitive. I think for me I have learned a big part of deciding on a synth isn't just sound but what you want to do with it and how it's laid out and whether or not that inspires creativity.
Also der Arp hat 3 Modi (up, down, up+down) und dann jeweils 1,2,alle Oktaven. Der poly D hat zwar mehr Varianten, aber da ich eh einen externen Sequenzer benutze, stört mich das nicht. Ich schätze es hängt davon ab, welchen Part der synth in der Komposition haben soll und was du noch für gear hast?
TBH they could have made a single synth combining these two, but people are too obsessed with replicas, so now we have two synths with huge overlap. Oh well.
In my opinion the Monopoly sounds beefier and way more polished than the Poly D, but in a good way. It' s like you lift a curtain and get the full spectrum whereas the Poly D sounds kinda dull.
@@JohnTrasher Really? Wow, didn' t think that but must say that I only trusted my ears and didn' t take a look at the analyzer in your video. I tested the Poly D myself and wasn' t impressed by it, especially when it came to deep bass sounds. The bottom end was missing in Subbass territory and the overall output Volume wasn' t that great, either. My Vermona Mono Lancet 15 which I use for basses most of the time has way more punch, imho.
Also ich find den bass schon nice... kannst ja mal hier reinhören ua-cam.com/video/XcJKQArTaPM/v-deo.html ab 0:20 kommt der richtige bassriff. Benutze aber auch den headphone Ausgang weil der nochmal n bisschen mehr verstärkt ist. Hab den mp zurück gegeben weil ich nur Platz für einen von beiden hatte, und den poly d schon so liebgewonnen habe 😁
For sure! I mostly use moog bass for low end or mixes that are bass heavy and most of high mid instruments. The Monopoly is a good pad and good rhythm synth. Without killing all your headroom in a mix. Def good in a band context for synth pop/indie stuff.
@@levijessegonzalez3629 you can watch this video of mine, where i made a little jam together with both: ua-cam.com/video/Pso0t1W4Zn4/v-deo.html I would say, monopoly is a little more versatile , but the feedback + distortion in the poly d create fatter basses
Good comparison show. The polyD is the best. Behringer should of put a sequencer in the monopoly. Big mistake. The monopoly is too clean compared to the D. That's why I never bought it. I think the monopoly cross osc section creates too much harshness to make it effective. The korg mono poly wasn't an amazing success when it came out to be honest. I think it is over rated and you quickly bore of it. Behringer need to get the proper polys out not pretend polys. For all the hype they create. They still have only ever produced one poly too date after many years. What a Shame really it disappoints me.
Sorry, but I find this really a strange video. These synthesizers are, and sound completely different, so what is the point of comparing them? Having an individual review of each of them fine, even in the same video but this one makes no sense to me. The monopoly has very specific features that the model D completely lacks so you are comparing apples with pears here. Very confusing.
Behringer are a terrible company that make terrible products and their knock offs are crap as well. Anyone that reviews their products still hasn't learned this, are not worth any views and that's why you only have 584 subscribers. Good luck with that though.
I disagree, we dont all have much money to spend on a real moog. I find Behringer a great company, also John is an underrated synth youtuber in my opinion.
this comment is so negative. I have plenty of these behringer synths and they are all fantastic in build quality and sound. They go on the used market for almost new prices and when behringer stops producibg some of them they went quickly above the new price. That sais it all.
Watched this video in 2021, decided to get Mono Poly ... wondered why I'd been so convinced, then realized how much it matters to run these things through reverb and delay. Then a friend got the Poly D, which convinced me to get one as well. "Get both" was evidently the best answer. Now I'm watching this again :)
Haha... Thanks for sharing your inevitable journey of GAS! :D
@@JohnTrasher -- It's not GAS if I actually use them ... right? please say that's right :)
I did get the Poly D via trade for a handful of Volcas, so it was actually a *reduction* of gear ... at least, until the next wave of Behri releases in November.
Anyway: thanks for your helpful video, which I will now be re-enacting at home.
@@VeloVios - wouldn't it be great if I had a good answer to that? But I didn't find the Poly D rewarding for me and traded it away, and neither has made it into a track for me. MP still highly interesting for its modulation possibilities
Jooooooohn!!! Hands down you have to be the man right now on youtube for being the first one to put those 2 synths next to each other. Not even Behringer has those bragging rights. Lol. Great video. On behalf of all the Behringer synth enthusiasts, thank you very much. Keep it coming.
Thank you so much for putting together a comprehensive video showing the differences. I ended up just getting the Poly-D because the knob interface/layout just looks more intuitive and better laid out.
Welcome!
I kept the poly d as well, however i really loved the fm sound.. :)
this video makes me so excited to pair mine together when it finally arrives! :)
Yeah i miss him now... i did a Video of them playing together : ua-cam.com/video/Pso0t1W4Zn4/v-deo.html
I had to decide between them due to lack of space
@@JohnTrasher which one did you keep?
Which one would you prefer?
Intro 0:00
Bass 0:32
Pads 5:00
Organ/Brass: 7:50
Waveform Shapes: 08:15
Detune: 11:14
FM FX: 12:07
Arpreggiator 13:45
Conclusion: 15:23
Outro 16:26
the poly D tbh...
MonoPoly. OSC sync opens up the possibilities & not having it on any synth limits all modulations(except filter & PW) to very tiny knob turns or you're unable to play in tune.
@@validcore the tuning of the poly is unproblematic though, once it has warmed up After 10 minutes or so and remains quite stable
I love the organ/ brass sound it sounds so harmonically rich, simple yet beautiful and complex
I prefer the MonoPoly, I like (what sounds like) the extra brightness and bite.
I love that you played M83 - Outro at the end! Thanks for the compassion
glad someone got the "pun" :D
They are both good , the Korg sound was always more my taste . More a New wave sound .
Good idea, this video is very useful, thank you
Appreciate your comment! :)
nice comparison! they sound nice together! at 16:55 !
Thank you!! Just what I was looking for... Is there one you like more? They both seem to compliment each-other when played together. The Poly D has lots of character and warmth, and the MP has lots of bite and energy.
If you only have 700€ to spend i would go with the poly D bc of the chorus and distortion/moogysound. I already used it in all of my own songvideos here if you want to check it out. I used it mainly for bass Riffs.
The MP has some other fields it excels, especially with the fm/fx section you can make really aggressive Sounds. The pwm is also a cool feature for more komplex/changing arp Sounds like in the beginning of this video :)
@@JohnTrasher Thank you! My doubt was precisely this! :) maybe you could pin your reply... Loved the video and now I want both!
That loopop melody was stuck in my head after watching it as well. Great choice!
Yeah basically that was the thing what sealed the deal for me
Thank you so much for this video!
Welcome! What are your thoughts?
I’m pretty sure you can fix the MonoPoly’s more muted tone by tuning the filters frequency. Starsky Carr has a good tutorial showing how he did it.
For sure! I sat with mine on the factory for a day. But the cutoff seem to really not be that sensitive and jump from a muted to open sound fast. Now I have it up to 20khz, giving it more room to fine dial in. I def recommend at least setting it to 15khz. It’s a very nice synth, and something that I could grab basics right away. But the fx section is where I’m learning a bit more daily. If you spend enough time with some effects. You can make some really leads! The organ sound is impressive as well for dark moody stuff. I have a model d. I’d say the Monopoly for me works in a band setting for indie rock stuff. The model d does as well..but not as easily. I spend a good amount of time getting the model d sound I want crafted. The Monopoly, you can kinda run with it out the box....if not getting crazy with the effects.
For me, the Poly D wins. I will buy it in one of these coming months.
I kept mine as well... :) however, i still miss the sound of the monopoly which i used in this video together with the poly d ua-cam.com/video/Pso0t1W4Zn4/v-deo.html
@@JohnTrasher Awesome sounds. Can't wait to have the Poly D!!
If I had to equate them to a movie in the same time period I would say the poly D is Xanadu and the monopoly is Terminator 1 1984.
Excellent video Sir! Both sound great. Think the Poly D has more of the tones I'd use.
Same for me!
thank you for this comparison. i think behringer's were very good in both cases. they gave the right sound to both instruments. the monopoly has the personality of the korg while the poly d is Moog. thanks again. now i know what to buy!
Which will it be?
@@JohnTrasher in my case the poly d. I did not want to clarify it before because in a short comment it did not seem correct. both machines are valid and the differences that you have highlighted allow each one to understand which is the most appreciated sound. korg has a more "oriental" sound, more refined on the treble, Moog is "fat" like American cars ...
.... with Korg you can be more "bad" and express more grit. with Moog you can explore a softness and an unmatched expressiveness. this is my opinion. I am a 60 year old amateur and recently started playing keyboards again. I'm struggling to learn the final part of Keith Emerson's Lucki Man ....
Nice comparison thank you!
Glad to hear, hope it helps!
Poly D sounds better... my opinion! I know you can’t really compare these two synths but if I had a choice... Poly D wins 👍 good Video!
Watching your comparison I would think the Poly D has warmer sound than the Monopoly but this one offers more versatility to control the sound, both are awesome machines 😍, whats your conclusion of the utility for both?
The harshness can be tweaked with a filter offset at the back of the unit. I kept the poly D because i had only space for one.
Which one do you like more after working with them for a while?. I find both sound good, but somehow the Monopoly sounded a bit warmer to my ears, while the D a bit fatter.
I kept the poly D and stack the 4 oscs for basslines in mostly all of my tracks
@@JohnTrasher thanks, good to know. :)
Excellent job!!!
Hello, how do I engage/activate the aftertouch? I can press as hard as I want, it doesn't seem to work.
@@piafounetMarcoPesenti on the poly D? The monopoly doesnt have AT capabilities
@@JohnTrasher Yes, on the Poly D.
@@piafounetMarcoPesenti you have to use 6,3mm cables for the ins and out on the back...
@@JohnTrasher Thank you
They are 2 different beasts!
3:48 if you like to hear my father farting ;D
😅👍
Very nice, thank you! Maybe you can do another one with punchy sequnces?
Do you have anything particular in mind?
@@JohnTrasher nothing particular, it's just to hear the punchiness of the enveloppes. Thx!
The Korg is snappier and has sort of plastic tonal quality in comparison to the D. I like the Korg.
Its the behringer monopoly in this video
Thank you for this review/comparison! I have been looking into getting a "solo" synth for my stack and I wondered how these two would compare as they seem to have similar superficial attributes. For my part, I think I will go toward the Poly D. While I'm sure I might experiment with the para-polyphony, I'm mostly interested in the mono sound and features. I wonder: has anyone compared the Poly D to the Behringer Model D? Polyphony notwithstanding, I suspect the Poly D might still win my affection. I'm only speaking for myself, of course. Again, thanks for doing this much-needed comparison.
Thanks, glad i could help!
ua-cam.com/video/Pso0t1W4Zn4/v-deo.html at 42 seconds the monopoly begins to play melody along with the poly D, doing things the poly can't do.
What do you think about some people saying these are the same synth just with different looks? I kind of want both but I don’t want them both if they’re the same synth.
well in its core, they are both 4 OSC paraphonic subtractive synths. So they have a lot in common and overlap quite much. However they differ in the FX section... MonoPoly is more flexible in PWM sounds (variable width modulation, LFO controlled) and has a FM feature. If money and space is not an issue, get both, otherwise i would go for the poly d... but i liked the FM sound on the MP as well... ua-cam.com/video/Pso0t1W4Zn4/v-deo.html here u can listen what i mean (starting 0:42)
Seems like it's like the difference between the MS-20 (Or I guess K2) and Model D. Does that make sense?
never played the ms-20, so i can't really tell. :D also, the model is is purely monophonic so i wouldnt say so...
@@JohnTrasher MS-20 and D are both monophonic.
Thank you
I just received my Monopoly, and the keybed is less soft than that of my poly d. Especially the white keys are so soft on my poly D. Way better on my Monopoly
I'll check later again, but to me the Keybed felt really the same. I got both synthesizers of the first production batch, maybe later versions were built differently (but i wouldnt think so)... overall they are okayish, and suitable for the purpose. I got an Electric Piano with wooden keys when i want to play really expressive... :)
The Poly D seems warmer & fatter, Mono/Poly seems brighter, and a bit harsher, but both possess desirable qualities. Given that both can be had for less than the cost of a single modern synth, I'll likely have the lot! My only gripe is lack of desktop models -- how many short, mediocre keybeds do I really need in my tiny studio? That's why I bought ONE expensive MIDI controller...
Yeah, true. On the otherhand, i seem to use my keyboard synth more often than the desktop modules, since they are more immediate in Assesebility
They sound completely different. Both are very warm
"The Behringer Poly D has a volume issue, and I'm honestly curious about what you think about using it. Could you please share your thoughts?"
I use the headphone out with a stereo cable. The headphone amp boosts the volume a little better
so for soviet post punk like the style of molchat doma music which one is the best for?
ua-cam.com/video/Pso0t1W4Zn4/v-deo.html fm mode maybe more suitable
Honestly, you could probably use either as long as you know how to program well.
I think the MonoPoly has a better sound for that kind of music, but thats just my opinion.
How did you get your poly mode to sound so good? whenever I play in poly and start to lay down chords, it sounds bad.
You have to make sure the oscs are almost perfectly in tune!
@@JohnTrasher I make sure all oscs are tuned together.. but still sounds bad...Very detuned...Any other ideas?
@@sedrickvalistar107 i have heard of an issue that the oscs are Not calibrateted. So the spread across the keybed isnt konsistent. U could check by playing the lowest note and only listen to each osc solo and if they stay in tune on the highest note (again cycle thru each osc seperatly)
How did you get the organ sound in MonoPoly?
@@Elmomeroloco23 i think i used triangle waveform
How’d you get your hands on a monopoly already?
A couple of them were in stock at thomann ( germany)
Still fantastic
Hey, could you turn up the volume of your voice next time? Very very quiet compared to the synths.
You're right. Maybe the automatic subtitles help in some questionable parts?
Yeah. A lot of people make these type of videos with low voice level. I try to watch quietly, without headphones, but then the music get blasted too loud after trying to listen to the voice. I'll just use headphones next time.
Wow they both win for me. I think I would be dancing about the place putting both into a track 🤣
Thanks. Do you have a page where you have these patches? You make them sound great.
I Made some patches for the Monopoly here: ua-cam.com/video/ohpI0R--0yw/v-deo.html
You can Pause and look At the knobs.
Ni man. Love Monopoly but pdas are great on the Poly D but the last pad on Monopoly wow ! Do you also have as many problems with tuning the poly D as many complain ?
Thanks! No, i do it by ear with my e piano. One osc after another, after 10 min warmup
@@JohnTrasher Ok I hear everyone complaining. Anyway I preferred the Korg but the weak point that I was sorry that it doesn't have an external audio in for external audio while the moog does or am I wrong?
I like to pass digital things into analog circuits
@@manuelsirotti9340 not sure about the moog (i guess so) but the behringer has it
@@JohnTrasher
The beringher only has it on the poly D not on the Monopoly right?
@@manuelsirotti9340 yeah i mean the poly d... i did another Video with both of them where the monopoly sounds really nice, however i kept only the poly d
Well, you showed me clearly why I need 2 of each. 😂
Hi from Indiana! New subscriber. 👍
Haha, thank you very much my friend! :)
Got the Poly D couple of months. Won't give it back, but sometimes it feels alone. Maybe it needs a sibling... 🙂 Greetings from Oldenburg!
@@philaesfarewell osnabrück ist nicht allzufern :D
I like the monopoly better. More flexible filter.
Valid point!
The monopoly seems to have a warmer sound where as the poly D is harsher, both great for really 70s/80s fat sounds
If you could have both of these or a Matrixbrute, what would you have?
Never owned the Matrixbrute. Its basically presets and 3 DCO vs no presets and 8 VCO. The mod Matrix on the Matrixbrute is superior ofc. I wanted a pure analog synth to understand what all this knobs actually do
@@JohnTrasher I think I prefer the tone of the Behringer synths. They sound more raw to my ears.
@@davecjd yeah, i use the poly D in my songs for my bass as well. Take a listen to the bassline in this Song if you like: ua-cam.com/video/XcJKQArTaPM/v-deo.html
Very helpful
Amazing you can tweek the knobs to get them similar . Great and help and teaching
@@rockanthems thank you! Nice to hear!
@@JohnTrasher had the Monopoly for a couple weeks… Now I’m waiting on the Poly D … i have a 1978 Memorymoog !!! It’s fricking Stunning
What’s an arpReggiator?
Bad pronunciation. 😅
I like both...
what is your recomendation for newbie like me, Poly D of Monopoly ?
For a newbie i would recommend neither because u cannot save/store presets. Then i would say they both are pretty similar. The poly d requires some 6.3mm patching capabilities for Aftertouch which i liked. I would go which sound u like most if presets arent an issue
so which one wins? I can only afford one. haha. leaning toward the poly d right now since I love a sequencer and would use it for bass a lot.
I dont use the sequenzer at all on my poly d, but i agree, if you want a moog-like bass, go with the Poly D, you wont be disappointed!
Exactly what i was looking for , Unless my hearing is a lot worse from club Djing they sound pretty similar ?will end up with both sooner or later but didnt know which to get first.since the MonoPoly is on sale atm i think i will jump on it
PeaceFromOZ
Have fun! :)
I'm loving the surgical gloves. Makes it more like a laboratory 😂
Thanks for the sub! Appreciate!
As for me ... the Poly D wins. I agree I've being excited about the MonoPoly but when hearing the comparison, I prefer the Poly D ... maybe it´s because there is more "Moog" in the sound.
For me is it the other way .
I believe monopoly velocity is MIDI out only and no aftertouch at all? Having both as onboard destinations as with poly d is an unfortunate omission IMHO.
Correct, no AT on the monopoly.
Copyright claim right there!!! :)
Thanks for the video!
Can you make some patches for the Poly D please?🥰 Btw thank you for this video!
thanks for your comments! i try to film my settings for every song i make. Did you settle for the Poly D?
Monopoly had no séquenceur and poly d yes. Exact?
Yes, only an arp function. But i use an external sequencer anyway
& that's why I canceled my PolyD preorder when they announced the MonoPoly
@Rhizosphere my assessment is if you can't afford and actual moog, get the poly d for the moog sound but grandmother isn't much more and is a way more capable synth, to me the mono/poly is more interesting modulation wise than the poly d.
@Rhizosphere Grandmother is great even without using modular, it's just a great rock solid sounding bass synth with a really nice sequencer/arpeggiator and spring reverb, the patching is just an added bonus.
@Rhizosphere, yeah I had both and I can say that while they both sound amazing I am more likely to grab a Grandmother again than a Matriarch. The raw sound of the Matriarch is great, just as good as Grandmother but Grandmothet feels more immediate to use. I really don't dig parphonic, it doesn't work with the way I want to play and so I tend to think of synths as either Poly or Mono and forget the paraphonic aspect because I just don't find it something I use all that much, and for the money and a mono I prefer the grandmother. Alot of things about the way the Matriarch was done I find frustrating, the way they implemented global settings for one. I sold both and got a Moog One, the raw sound isn't the same but it is absolutely a fantastic and capable synth that is well laid out and super intuitive. I think for me I have learned a big part of deciding on a synth isn't just sound but what you want to do with it and how it's laid out and whether or not that inspires creativity.
Guter Vergleich 😀, habe mir nämlich auch überlegt einen zu Kaufen, weiß nur nicht welchen, der Monopoly hat leider nur einen Arpeggiator
Also der Arp hat 3 Modi (up, down, up+down) und dann jeweils 1,2,alle Oktaven. Der poly D hat zwar mehr Varianten, aber da ich eh einen externen Sequenzer benutze, stört mich das nicht. Ich schätze es hängt davon ab, welchen Part der synth in der Komposition haben soll und was du noch für gear hast?
@@JohnTrasher ja ok, ja wahrscheinlich, bin noch am überlegen 😉, auf jeden Fall ist dein Video sehr hilfreich für mich
TBH they could have made a single synth combining these two, but people are too obsessed with replicas, so now we have two synths with huge overlap. Oh well.
Yeah a Kombination of both in one synth would be a Killer 😅
And then someone like you would say it lacks character.
Dude, with these two synths you're all set
Yeah it pretty much started with the poly d for me.. now i am a few grands lighter.. 😅 #gas
In my opinion the Monopoly sounds beefier and way more polished than the Poly D, but in a good way. It' s like you lift a curtain and get the full spectrum whereas the Poly D sounds kinda dull.
Although the poly d produces more frequencies in the upper spectrum.
@@JohnTrasher Really? Wow, didn' t think that but must say that I only trusted my ears and didn' t take a look at the analyzer in your video. I tested the Poly D myself and wasn' t impressed by it, especially when it came to deep bass sounds. The bottom end was missing in Subbass territory and the overall output Volume wasn' t that great, either. My Vermona Mono Lancet 15 which I use for basses most of the time has way more punch, imho.
Edit: Sehe gerade, dass Du aus Deutschland kommst, dann können wir ja auch auf Deutsch in den Kommentaren schreiben 🤣👍! Grüße aus Hessen.
Also ich find den bass schon nice... kannst ja mal hier reinhören ua-cam.com/video/XcJKQArTaPM/v-deo.html ab 0:20 kommt der richtige bassriff. Benutze aber auch den headphone Ausgang weil der nochmal n bisschen mehr verstärkt ist. Hab den mp zurück gegeben weil ich nur Platz für einen von beiden hatte, und den poly d schon so liebgewonnen habe 😁
@@JohnTrasher Aight! Mach ich. Danke Dir für dein Feedback!!! Das Platzproblem kenne ich auch 🤣
❤
Monopoly all the way for me... more exciting character imho
I think in a Indie Rock band or in a Similar Context the Monopoly will sound better in the mix. The poly D is too strong.
For sure! I mostly use moog bass for low end or mixes that are bass heavy and most of high mid instruments. The Monopoly is a good pad and good rhythm synth. Without killing all your headroom in a mix. Def good in a band context for synth pop/indie stuff.
SYNTHPUNK sent me here. 😎
haha which video? isnt he hating all the behringer stuff?
@@JohnTrasher yes John, he's "trashing" all the Behringer stuff. 😉🤣
I'm a self-admited Korg fan-boy. The model D runs away with this hands down. Not even close.
Runs away?
what can the monopoly do the POLY D can't Do?
One more lfo, variable pulsewidht, mutual detune of the OSCs, "FM modulation" (kind of)
@@JohnTrasher so it's the more versatile of the two? which has the fatter, big bass?
@@levijessegonzalez3629 you can watch this video of mine, where i made a little jam together with both: ua-cam.com/video/Pso0t1W4Zn4/v-deo.html
I would say, monopoly is a little more versatile , but the feedback + distortion in the poly d create fatter basses
Please calibrate the monopoly filter! What a comparison. Thats not really ok i think. Sorry.
This video was shot over a year ago 3 days after the monopoly was released. Back then it was unknown that the filter offset was so harsh.
Vs DJ. Pauly D
😁
Good comparison show. The polyD is the best. Behringer should of put a sequencer in the monopoly. Big mistake. The monopoly is too clean compared to the D. That's why I never bought it. I think the monopoly cross osc section creates too much harshness to make it effective. The korg mono poly wasn't an amazing success when it came out to be honest. I think it is over rated and you quickly bore of it. Behringer need to get the proper polys out not pretend polys. For all the hype they create. They still have only ever produced one poly too date after many years. What a Shame really it disappoints me.
Its the chorus and inbuild distortion that make the nice sound. The harshness is tweakable with the filter offset screw i think
Worst subtitles ever :-)
Haha yeah but for automatic they are pretty close! 😅
wow two synths and wasted money
when you want to sell them nobody will buy it
it's like selling a Seat or a VW
This is not true...
Synth snob detected!
Sorry, but I find this really a strange video. These synthesizers are, and sound completely different, so what is the point of comparing them? Having an individual review of each of them fine, even in the same video but this one makes no sense to me. The monopoly has very specific features that the model D completely lacks so you are comparing apples with pears here. Very confusing.
Well, same size, same prize, 4 osc paraphonie...
if you dont know which one to buy. .
Behringer are a terrible company that make terrible products and their knock offs are crap as well. Anyone that reviews their products still hasn't learned this, are not worth any views and that's why you only have 584 subscribers. Good luck with that though.
I had like 50 when i uploaded this, its fine I guess
I disagree, we dont all have much money to spend on a real moog. I find Behringer a great company, also John is an underrated synth youtuber in my opinion.
this comment is so negative. I have plenty of these behringer synths and they are all fantastic in build quality and sound. They go on the used market for almost new prices and when behringer stops producibg some of them they went quickly above the new price. That sais it all.
They upped their game. You are out of the loop with your old opinion.