E-Mount Cine Lens | SLR MAGIC MICROPRIME CINE 35MM | REVIEW

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 кві 2019
  • E Mount Cine Lens | SLR MAGIC MICROPRIME CINE 35MM | REVIEW
    SLR Magic released a cinema-grade version of their e mount prime lens series called the MicroPrime Cine lenses, which have a new lens coating and lens group construction. This, the 35mm T1.3, has got to be my favorite of the bunch.
    UPDATE: a few corrections... the iris has 7 blades, and these lenses can’t fit on the Sony F5/55. Cheers!
    The Lens: amzn.to/2FJzq9c
    _____________________
    My Camera: amzn.to/3x74cFd
    The BEST Mic I've ever used: amzn.to/3uag9bo
    Tripod: amzn.to/3NTlLi3
    My favorite lenses: amzn.to/3Kc1cew, amzn.to/3NSoR68
    The go-to lights for my UA-cam videos: amzn.to/3LJUVXT

КОМЕНТАРІ • 81

  • @JamieLoreteFilms
    @JamieLoreteFilms 5 років тому +3

    great review! I'll be picking up mine soon! Thanks man!

  • @mrmohanty5674
    @mrmohanty5674 3 роки тому +3

    Duuude, you have such an awesome eye for composition. even the color grade was on point man.

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  3 роки тому +1

      Thanks a lot, man! Definitely appreciate the love on the video.
      Have you seen the Sirui anamorphic review? Just posted it!

    • @mrmohanty5674
      @mrmohanty5674 3 роки тому

      @@imnickfriend Dont know if it means anything much to you but i actually went back to this video again and casted your video specifically on my 4k TV after watching on my cellphone just to really appreciate the artistry in those shots. You also gave me a reason to buy this lens showcasing whats possible and beyond and my 35 is on its way as we speak. I will watch you new video for sure after all my office meetings end for the day and leave a comment for you there if that helps.

  • @hansmadula484
    @hansmadula484 5 років тому +2

    Loved the review!

  • @michaelweichhardt
    @michaelweichhardt 3 роки тому +3

    I personally use the 50mm T1.2 MicroPrime for most of my work. In case I need wider I also have the 18mm T2.8 MicroPrime. These two have the flaring and bokeh I wanted.

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  3 роки тому

      Tell me more about the 18mm! I need a good ultrawide cine lens.

  • @danielnathan1198
    @danielnathan1198 3 роки тому +1

    Totally getting one

  • @ArchieRowe
    @ArchieRowe 8 місяців тому

    Dope AF presentation bro! Also what track is that in the background? Keep doing your thing.

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  8 місяців тому +1

      I have nooooo idea that was so long ago haha

  • @ZachTigue
    @ZachTigue 5 років тому +3

    Are you from Chattanooga? That looks like the bridge at Coolidge Park. Really have my eyes on these lenses for my Fujifilm XT3, just waiting on more reviews. Thanks for making this!

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  5 років тому +2

      Yeah man. Living there for now. That bridge is a favorite spot of mine to shoot

  • @Loqu4
    @Loqu4 5 років тому +5

    i have the 25mm and 75mm, i'd say it reacts great to flares, the softness works great with skintones under good lighting or outdoors. Totally not usable for ambient indoor lighting though.

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  5 років тому +1

      No, the coatings pick up too much of that blooming that happened from ambient light. Totally agree

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  5 років тому +1

      I typically don't shoot faster than 2.8 which seems to stop the issue

    • @GreaterGoals
      @GreaterGoals 2 роки тому

      @@imnickfriend could SLR Magic CINE 35mm F1.2 lens be used in a party or wedding ? Maybe aet the foxus to infinity would be the solution ?

  • @TylerLeeKenyon
    @TylerLeeKenyon 5 років тому +3

    It has a 13-blade aperture! Wish the microprimes were a bit sharper, but that image is very pleasing.

  • @jaegermah
    @jaegermah 3 роки тому

    Yo! Great work. Love the colour more than anything. Would you be willing to share you're log setting / LUT details???? hehe. I'd love to use this for my next shoot. A million thanks.

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  3 роки тому +1

      I'd love to share one but I don't use LUTs for my UA-cam videos. Sorry mate!

    • @jaegermah
      @jaegermah 3 роки тому

      @@imnickfriend just using the colour wheels in Premiere eh? Love it man.

  • @ianvancattenburch3437
    @ianvancattenburch3437 5 років тому +2

    Returning my SLR Magic 50mm Microprime 1.2 for Fuji. Very noise focus ring and now it's become wobbly. From what I hear, the quality control is sub par so you got lucky.

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  5 років тому

      Damn. Sorry to hear that. The focus ring is a bit noisy, I've noticed. Only on faster focus pulls, but noisier than expected. LMK about how the Fuji turns out!

  • @pablo-zn1mg
    @pablo-zn1mg 2 місяці тому

    Nice quick review, thanks !
    Would you still recommend this lens today in this budget range ?

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  Місяць тому

      Yes, definitely

    • @pablo-zn1mg
      @pablo-zn1mg Місяць тому

      @@imnickfriend nice! in the price range I didn't find anything that beat this lens so I already got a copy from BH haha. it's pretty nice.
      I am though getting plenty of funky flaring and I wonder if it's my tiffen VND or the actual lens.

  • @RockWILK
    @RockWILK 3 роки тому

    awesome video... I love the look of these lenses. Looking to get a few for my Sony a6400. I have a question... what's the difference between their e mount cine and micro prime cine for e mount?? Why f2.8 as opposed to t2.8? Are both versions "equivalent" focal lengths for a6xxx series cameras? Thanks for the great work and the information. Peace....

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  3 роки тому +2

      So, T stops and f-stops are measured in different ways. An f-stop is measured by the amount of light that can be let in to a lens, and a T stop is the amount of light that can be let out of the lens. T stops are much more universal measurements, which is why you see them on cinema lenses, So when you switch from a T2.8 Canon to a T2.8 SLR magic then they’re both going to have the same amount of light value coming out of the back of the lens. The same cannot be said with two f/2.8 lenses. Additionally the Cine version of these lenses have a little bit more of a high-quality coating to some of the lens elements, giving it a slightly cleaner look. But you still get that quintessential SLR magic look to your videos.

    • @RockWILK
      @RockWILK 3 роки тому

      @@imnickfriend thanks so much for the response. Much appreciated.

  • @42atlas
    @42atlas 5 років тому +2

    Beautiful stuff man

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  5 років тому

      Thanks man! Going for equal parts Pete McKinnon and Philip Bloom.

    • @42atlas
      @42atlas 5 років тому

      @@imnickfriend do you have any other channels? You mustn't post here very often, couldn't even remember subbing to you, no doubt I did though

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  5 років тому

      I was posting weekly but took some time off. Had a few major projects come up that took every ounce of my time. I’m BACK now!

  • @franklinmichael671
    @franklinmichael671 5 років тому +1

    0:55 can you fix focus breathing in post by punching in on the footage? Assuming you don't mind loosing a bit of resolution
    Also do you stabilize your videos with anything or just go hand held?

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  5 років тому +2

      I wouldn’t recommend punching in to fix the breathing. The breathing effects the actual optics, so using the digital punch in will give a little too much difference from one shot to another.

  • @spiderwayne
    @spiderwayne 5 років тому

    Great review and I'm thinking about buying it but i have a question. I'm looking at either the 25mm or the 35mm and can't find information on the minimum focus for them. Can you tell me what it is? Thanks!

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  5 років тому

      I’m not sure, actually. I didn’t really do proper testing on it. But I did get some shots where I walked into focus and that was the closest focus I could get (I think. Not 100% sure). I’d say it’s around a foot and a half, but I’m not sure.

    • @spiderwayne
      @spiderwayne 5 років тому

      @@imnickfriend Thanks!

  • @user-oy4ei8if6r
    @user-oy4ei8if6r 2 роки тому

    Hello, I would like to ask, I am currently hesitant to choose Sigma's 35mmF1.2 or this lens. Because to me the purple fringing and dispersion of the object would be more important. Does this lens have better purple fringing and dispersion control than Sigma?

  • @mahanteshhalagimardi951
    @mahanteshhalagimardi951 2 роки тому +1

    sir, anybody tell me review of SLR MAGIC MICROPRIME CINE 35MM T1.3 SONY E-MOUNT

  • @rectape
    @rectape 5 років тому +2

    Thanks for this video. Where did you find it at 599? It seems to be more like a thousand euro

  • @outsetstudiohub
    @outsetstudiohub 4 роки тому +1

    This lens compatible with Sony fs 700

  • @GreaterGoals
    @GreaterGoals 2 роки тому

    could SLR Magic CINE 35mm F1.2 lens be used in a party or wedding ? Maybe set the foxus to infinity would be the solution ?

  • @CGP_Films92
    @CGP_Films92 4 роки тому

    So what is the difference between this lens and the SLR Magic Cine 35mm f1.2 FE (aside from aperture)? They are both marketed as “cine” lenses and that confuses me.
    I just purchased a higher end Sony camera and have primarily shot with Canon (I also own a C100) since getting into cinematography nearly a decade ago and am needing Sony compatible lenses. Just wanted a recommendation on which of the two I should consider. I have both in my B&H cart as we speak lol

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  4 роки тому +1

      The construction and there’s a slightly higher quality coating.

    • @CGP_Films92
      @CGP_Films92 4 роки тому

      FriendFilms Do you think the higher quality coating makes that big a difference in image quality though?

  • @yosuketanaka113
    @yosuketanaka113 3 роки тому +1

    has anyone compared SLR CINE and microprimes?

  • @snapshit8617
    @snapshit8617 2 роки тому

    could you please explain why to you it made sense, buying a full manual e-mount lens when you could just as easily have adapted almost any other lens to that? i mean ef-mount lenses wouldn't make any difference (or would they) except you could also use them on much more camera systems. i think that is one of the most genius things about e-mount: the flange distance allows to adapt almost anything...
    thanks for the review though!

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  2 роки тому +1

      Yea, happy to explain why. It’s simple. I wanted it. And it is smaller than any EF version. Also I just wanted it.

  • @kenny1463
    @kenny1463 2 роки тому

    Hey Nick:) Do you still use this lens? How do you like it? Do you have any other focal lengths from this set?

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  2 роки тому +1

      I don’t use this lens anymore because the manual focus is too slow for my workflow but it’s a delightful piece of kit.
      Never used others from the set though

  • @heinmuster
    @heinmuster 3 роки тому

    Does 12mm and 25mm have the same sensor size coverage? I bought to of those lens and using on my MFT sensor and the 25mm looks like 50mm and it's perfect but the 12mm looks way wider than 14mm. Is it just the way it feels or is it actuary wider? If anybody can answer, please comment on this.

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  3 роки тому +1

      With MFT, you're basically getting a 2x crop on your lenses. the SLRMagic lenses are labeled with their full-frame equivalencies, so if you have a 25, it should look like a 50 and if you have a 12, it should look like a 24. Lens manufacturer focal length's vary from company to company, but the differences won't be THAT much.

    • @heinmuster
      @heinmuster 3 роки тому

      @@imnickfriend Thanks a lot!

  • @epzamora
    @epzamora 2 роки тому

    @FriendFilms ..and to anyone else who can answer... I'm new to cine lenses. Why are hard stops on the focus ring something desired?

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  2 роки тому +1

      It’s a helpful way to know when you’re at infinity or close focus.

    • @epzamora
      @epzamora 2 роки тому

      @@imnickfriend Thanks! I get how lacking a hard stop, you could turn and turn the focus ring never knowing the end... but there appears to be a very discernible click on the hard stops for this lens. Is that "normal" or desired?

  • @monaronald0511
    @monaronald0511 5 років тому +1

    How do you find the image quality?

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  5 років тому +1

      I like that it's not absolutely perfect. there's little characteristics in the bokeh and the breathing and the slightly warm color shift. I like it a lot.

  • @LIMNOPHILA
    @LIMNOPHILA 5 років тому +1

    Is this a native anamorphic scale output ?

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  5 років тому

      It’s a spherical lens, not anamorphic

  • @michaelreyguayco6498
    @michaelreyguayco6498 4 роки тому

    Is it sharp? how about chromatic aberration?

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  4 роки тому

      it's sharp in the center but there's a lot of falloff toward the edges, BUT if you use that as a conscious factor, you can make it work in your favor.

  • @ahmedhashmi3584
    @ahmedhashmi3584 5 років тому

    Would you say that a follow focus would be required to use this lens?

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  5 років тому +2

      Absolutely not. that’s a really great feature on these lenses. The focus throw is long enough to be precise, but short enough to go handheld.

    • @ahmedhashmi3584
      @ahmedhashmi3584 5 років тому

      @@imnickfriend Thanks! I was worried that the focus would constantly need to be messed around with constantly due to focus breathing etc

    • @_rhapsodist
      @_rhapsodist 5 років тому

      he didn't say that..

    • @_rhapsodist
      @_rhapsodist 5 років тому

      @@ahmedhashmi3584 you seem to have no idea what focus breathing is..

    • @ahmedhashmi3584
      @ahmedhashmi3584 5 років тому +1

      @@_rhapsodist I would appreciate an explanation as I'm still a bit new to filmmaking

  • @SoundSpeeding
    @SoundSpeeding 4 роки тому

    Can you swap the mounts?

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  4 роки тому

      No and that’s SUPER frustrating for me.

    • @SoundSpeeding
      @SoundSpeeding 4 роки тому

      @@imnickfriend it is very disappointing, we need to keep on hassling SLR Magic to make this happen!

  • @toxichatter5853
    @toxichatter5853 2 роки тому

    So this lens wouldn’t be good indoors?

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  2 роки тому

      No, it’d be a delight inside. Super fast.

  • @bitspacemusic
    @bitspacemusic 4 роки тому

    The whole point of using cine lenses is that they have no breathing etc. One of the reasons they cost a premium, so as always, you get what you pay for it.

    • @imnickfriend
      @imnickfriend  4 роки тому +2

      I'd say that ONE of the reasons to get SOME cine lenses is to have no breathing. However, the characteristics can provide a unique feel that may be appropriate for the type of shot the shooter is shooting for... it's all a matter of taste, style, and need.

  • @MOVIMKR7
    @MOVIMKR7 2 роки тому

    Breathing and and and. No thanks