@@firstumpire you can cover any topic but please don't give those examples of Innovation..Lara was innovative so was ahead of Sachin there. Surya is most innovative means he is ahead of Kohli
@@firstumpire Great video, you have a new subscriber ! I am a huge sourav ganguly fan! I believe dada the batsman is extremely underrated, and his captaincy had overshadowed his batting. He was a great batsman too! I request you to please post a video on this topic, thanks!
Out of Sachin’s 100 centuries, India won 53 matches and drawn 20 matches and lost 27 times. In many cases Sachin century was not enough because other batsmen failed to score. For me Sachin’s batting truly feels like a poetry. Whether it was his straight drives, the mastery over spin, or his adaptability across formats and conditions it’s just phenomenal.
@@kaustubhgandhalikar5433 plz don't teach me what I need to do or not to do. There is space for opinions and I'm entitled to my views like everyone as long as it doesn't hurt anyone.
@@Suraj-h7t 2 occasions out of 350 plus total innings is not even a sample size. Vs Pakistan we lost. He could not do 16 more runs. Clearly he could not handle saqlain Mushtaq and got out hitting. Pls don't argue on his 4th innings average. You will get nothing. Test matches are always won or lost in 4th innings. I am from Mumbai I am also fan of his craft but definitely he was not there when it matters. Pains to mention this but that's the truth. All his imperious innings have come in losing cause it's a fact. 114 at Perth 169 in south Africa 116 at MCG and 136 at Chennai. Pls think twice before mentioning his ability to adapt and still if you need to mention then pls put 1st innings brilliance. He is the closest to batting perfection. That's it.
According to me since 90s to till now i.e. present year 2024, Top 5 Greatest Batsman, Pacer, Spinner and the greatest cricketer since 90s to till now i.e. present year 2024 - 🔸Batsman : 1. Sachin Tendulkar 2. Brian Lara 3. Virat Kohli 4. Ricky Ponting 5. Ab de Villiers 🔸Pacers : 1. Glenn McGrath 2. Wasim Akram 3. Dale Steyn 4. Curtly Ambrose 5. Jasprit Bumrah 🔸Spinners : 1. Shane Warne 2. Muralitharan 3. Anil Kumble 4. Saqlain Mushtaq 5. Ravichandran Ashwin 🔸Greatest Cricketer since 90s to till now i.e. present year 2024 : Jacques Kallis
Probably the best analyst these days.. and i watched literally everyone from 2003-04 era where the quality was really good on news channels. Sir if you can do a collab with vikrant sir . Please expand your reach
Tendulkar has great backup support in co batsman. Lara didn't. Also Lara played most of his match in unfriendly batting fast bowler track whereas Sachin played in batting friendly asian pitch
look at their stats, Lara averages 58 at home against 52 for Sachin, Sachin averages 50 in NZL, ENGland and Australia, Lara averages only 41. Sachin has played more than half of his innings outside India which is 40% for Lara. Lara struggled in England, Australia, NZL, India and Pakistan. Sachin struggled only in South Africa where he still averaged 46 same as Lara. Lara played most of his Innings in Flat West Indian Wickets and struggled everywhere else other than SriLanka(Again Flat Spin Friendly wickets), But still failed in Pakistan and India(Spin friendly Flat wickets) Except 3 of the greatest innings played in test Cricket, Lara was quite ordinary batsman.
Lara was also backed by Chanderpaul Carl hooper etc. 90s was same for both. After 90s Gayle, Ramnaresh Sarwan etc. Lara also was captain like sachin. There is no comparison between both were legends.
@@sherrysingh25 u cannot compare a hooper with Dravid or even Azhar. Chandrapaul yes was a good batsman. In case of West Indies batting load was more or less in hands of Lara n Chanderpaul
Brian Lara has the Highest Individual Score in Tests & First Class Sachin was the World's First (Male) Batsman to Scored ODI 200 Schin is the World's Highest Run Scorer and has the World's Highest Centuries (100) Sachin actually made Cricket as a Sport Popular and it was Cricket that made Lara famous In the 1990s, Sachin literally was the Whole & Sole of Indian Cricket Team. At a time when the Team was dominated by Fixers such as Azharuddin, Sidhu, Jadeja, Mongia, Prabhakar etc, Sachin always stood tall. The West Indies in the 90s had a lot of Stalwarts apart from Lara i.e. Curtly Ambrose, Gayle, Chandrapal etc.
Azharuddin, Jadeja and Siddhu were never proven to be fixers. Also, in the '90s the Windies' downfall began. Windies never won any tournaments and series after 1995 and only Brian Lara was carrying the side. Meanwhile, in 90's we have Rahul and Ganguly making their debut and Azhar was in peak form in the early 90's. Sachin was shouldering a lot of responsibility but only batting cannot win matches. As the India team evolved, Sachin's batting flair began to shine and he grew as the strategies and began to contribute more with the ball as well. Meanwhile, Lara was flamboyant because Windies was such a strong team when Lara made his debut and it did not change much.
Tendulker Carry the entire national single handedly especially in the team in which other 10 players were fixers. Tendulker by far the most complete batsman ever lived.
Lol bro Windies team was not any better than India during most of Lara's career. In fact, India's batting for most of Tendulkar's career (with Azharuddin, Dravid, Ganguly, Laxman, Sehwag) in team, Tendulkar had a better batting line-up to rely on. Tendulkar might as well be Lara (worth debating I am not sure) but please stop reverse-engineering reasons to tell yourself that Tendulkar is better than everyone.
@@ABBartan There is a big difference when it comes to a weak team and a team in which the other 10 players are fixers. A weak team has at least some intention to play. in the second option, players play for the opposition team. it's like Tendulkar vs 21 players.
Not all are fixer.. except few 3-4 players .. Don't finger the dignity of Ganguly, Dravid, Kumble, Srinath , and many more like those.. only jadeja, Azhar and the kingpin manoj prabhakar were bastards @@punitnaik
These are the sort of videos I am even willing to join a UA-cam channel membership for. That's how original the cricket discussions on this channel are, not bland cricket reporting. Keep up it up !
Tendulkar ka stance itna perfect tha ki unko dekhne keliye log bhid me aate the ..agar us time pe insta hota to aaj sachin tendulkar k 400 millions se b jyada fan followers ho jaate ya fur usse b jyada hote ...he is awesme player
Once set, its almost impossible to get Laras wicket. That's the reason why he was able to achieve 375, 400, 500-+ in an innings.Lara when in mood, completely dominated the bowlers we used to clearly see that bowlers surrender to his batting class & they don't know how to get him out. Where in Sachin on the other hand even after scoring a double hundred, used to poke the ball outside the off stump. That's why he couldn't make a 250 in 24 years of cricket. I had the privilege of watching both of these legends bat, in my opinion Brian Charless Lara was a better batsman.
but consistency is also important..lara was a big innings plyer but not consistent like tendulkar..the correct terms should be ‘better’ for sachin & ‘dangerous’ for lara
@@arvinds-cs1sm agree to some extent on the technical aspects of batting. But you can't compare sachin with Brian charless when they were in full flow. Lara becomes Don brafman when he was in full flow - bowlers can't get him - threy only need to wait until he makes a mistake.
@@RavinderRajGuru we can't say that also... One a 100+ scores, lara had stayed notout only 2/34 times has declared only 1/34 times ( that too after reaching the peakmost acheivement 400* - in course drawning a grabbable match) on other hand , sachin had stayed 17/51 hundreds notout...exactly 1/3rd...(either match ended as draw or team was allout) 9/51 times India declared the innings to try to win the match, 7 of which are 150+ scores (including that 194*)...in short, while playing a 100+ innings, it. Was sachin who was really left untouched/unbeaten the most !!! He never had the chance to show his full potential in 33.33% of his centuries, while lara couldn't play a full innings only 2.9% ( or simply just 1 innings , if we consider 400* as a full innings that could be played).... Don't forget that in oneball -ODI ( when only 1 ball was used and reverse swing worked for last 10 overs), sachin was the only man to score a 200 and held the most 150+ scores record....(others started scoring 200s & multiple 150s only after one ball in odi was changed to 2 new balls from both end , so that reverse swing will be absent and batsmen can play last 10-15 overs in t20 style)
Expectations + injury + lack of trusted player 1993 to 1999 = led him change his playing style aggressive & calculative risk player to moderate inning player. Later half after 2007 again change in batting style reminder of younger days .
As a batsman it's all about pitch and conditions. In Indian subcontinent not only Lara but no one in the world around Sachin. You just can't imagine that someone can bat better than Sachin in our pitches and conditions while in the sena countries there are many competitive names like Lara, ponting and others. Even VVS Laxman has his own class particularly in Australia which perhaps even no Australian batter can achieve.
Who is rating VVS Laxman higher in Australia against Australian batsmen like Ricky Ponting Mark Waugh and Damien Martin. Pls. Guys don't hero worship only indian batsmen. I am an ardent VVS Laxman fan but I also have to accept that he doesn't have a single Test Hundred in England.
When it comes to art of play, timing to cricket ball and beautiful to watch laxman was better than ponting but he needs some true bounce and conditions. He wasn't that tough and hard to cricket ball so he could not been competitive in so many conditions and cricket like odi or T20 but he was simply treated to watch.
Great video, you have a new subscriber ! I am a huge sourav ganguly fan! I believe dada the batsman is extremely underrated, and his captaincy had overshadowed his batting. He was a great batsman too! I request you to please post a video on this topic, thanks!
@@kaustubhgandhalikar5433 he scored those runs mostly at number 5 and 6. Apart from players like Chanderpaul and steve waugh, tell me how many players have scored 10k runs batting at that position? Laxman had scored 8k runs, does it mean he was not one of the finest test batsman of india? No, it was because he himself batted at that position in which it’s required to play with the tail and you do not have much opportunity to score big runs. Plus dada was the captain of the team so he had to manage the team as well not solely focusing on his batting. Even after all this the guy scored more than 7k test runs, which clearly tells me that he was a great test batsman apart from being one of the greatest batsman in the odi format
सचिन और लारा दोनों ही अपने वक्त के ग्रेटेस्ट बैट्समैन थे लेकिन अगर देखा जाए तो सर सचिन तेंदुलकर बहुत बड़े क्रिकेटर हैं. उन्होंने क्रिकेट 24 साल तक खेला. 1 अरब 21 करोड लोगों की उम्मीदों के बोझ को अपने कंधों पर रखकर देश के लिए खेला है. सचिन वन मैन आर्मी थे. वर्ल्ड क्रिकेट में अब सचिन से बड़ा प्लेयर ना कभी आया है ना आएगा. अगर सर सचिन तेंदुलकर इस समय क्रिकेट खेल रहे होते तो उनके 200+ से ज्यादा इंटरनैशनल सेंचुरी होती. क्योंकि 90s में पिचेस बहुत ही ज्यादा खतरनाक थी और साथ ही जिस तरह के क्वालिटी बॉलर थे जैसे वसीम अकरम, वकार यूनिस, सकलैन मुश्ताक, शोएब अख्तर, वास, मुरलीधर, एंब्रोस, वाल्स, डोनाल्ड, पोलक, ग्लेन मैकग्रैथ, शेन वार्न, ब्रेट ली. ये सारे के बड़े खतरनाक हुआ करते थे. इनके सामने खड़ा होना भी बड़ी बात थी.
Lara test match me bhi kafi attacking tarike se khelte the aur bahut badi innings khelne k liye Jane jate the jabki Sachin test me thoda sa Aram se khelte the
Tendulkar had good batsman players in Indian team behind him ..Lara was one many army in west indies team .. Tendulkar played without pressure and he was opener .. Lara payed and won more matches of his Own single handed .. He played under immense pressure .. Tendulkar was a running machine. ..both players are supreme in their own ways...
He played with ,viv Richards, chanderpaul,Carl Hooper ,desmond heyons, Richardson, and two of the best fast bowlers in cricket history walsh and Ambrose,,
@@sanchit7100 he played with VIV ,Desmond, Richardson, Hooper, Chanderpaul, Sarwan, Gayle, Walsh, Ambrose. Kya funk ke like date ho. 90's WI Team had better cricketers than 90's Indian team.
@@KKpandita88 bro you replied to my comment 😂😂, I was replying to orignal comment and trying to tell him that lara played with better cricketers than srt
तेंदुलकर की तुलना लारा से नहीं बनती, मैं लारा को भी पसंद करता हूँ, लारा और तेंदुलकर को टेस्ट खेलते हुए देखा लारा की हाइप ऑस्ट्रेलिया इंग्लैंड पाकिस्तान के कुछ मुख्य गेंदबाजो द्वारा क्रिएट की गयी सचिन की सुप्रीमेसी से बचने के लिये इन लोगों में सचिन को लेकर हीन भावना थी टेस्ट में अच्छे लक्ष्मण की कौन बात करता है जबकि युवराज की हाइप देखिये सो काल्ड क्रिकेट जीनियस टेस्ट का भले शोर मचाते हों, मगर हाइप one day से बनती थी उस जमाने में इतना आसान थोड़े है दोनों को पृथक करके देखना
@@2605deepak feel grateful to have a reply from you I was watching the channel from the ind vs eng series . Ritesh and your's chemistry is the best among all other anchors and please dont call me bro I'm 16.😆😅
I totally agree with you.. I had that in mind but I was not sure if audience would like it or not.. Too many numbers might distract them or might make it boring for them.. but surely I will give it a try in future.. Thanks for the suggestions.. ❤
No Comparison between both and because both were some of the GOATs. Please talk about Javagal Srinath as a bowler as compared to modern indian Quick bowlers.
Sir your analysis are absolutely on spot and it is better in monologue mode. However sir, we would like to know about yourself. How much u have played and pls flaunt ur IIT credentials. Just as what Harsha Bhogle does of IIMA. It will add an authenticity to ur viewers
Thanks for the compliments bro.. Harsha is legendary.. He is solely responsible for bringing the professionalism in sports presentations in India.. what he did in that era is truely remarkable.. very few would realize but he is almost my dad's age 😂
I'm building India's biggest Web3 and Blockchain community under the banner of Crewsphere: ICP India Hub along with my cofounders.. Cricket is my passion and have no plans to carve out a career or a side career out of it.. it's a meditative experience for me n I'm extremely lucky to have an amazing team which made it possible for me with my minimal efforts 🙏😊
Sachin broke Lara's record in more matches . Lara scored more runs in pressure and bowlers feared him more than Tendulkar. Just recently saw the podcast of Jarrod kimber where he said that he asked something like 70+ world class batters that who was a better batsmen and 80-90% said LARA. Sachin had a better defensive technique than Lara but Lara was a destroyer of bowling of any sorts. Sachin had longevity which is a sign of greatness but everyone knows his last 3 years and the struggles while Lara scored double hundreds for fun in his last year. ( 2006 ). Sachin had the likes of Laxman Dravid sehwag while Lara played with Chandrapaul. Enough said. Lara the greater batsmen , sachin prolly greater career with WC wins and etc
@@kaustubhgandhalikar5433 And same Allan Donald called Sachin Tendulkar as the best ever batsman, not Lara or Ponting. Sachin got out more than 300 times in tests and 400+ times in odd. So what is your point? A batsman cannot get out. Bradman came under pressure only once in his last test innings and got out for "DUCK". Have you seen Lara's stumps scattered by Waqar Younis and SHoab Akhtar on many times. Get some space man.
are you fool or dumb ???👀👀👀 Lara scored double hundred in test in last year, but he was only 37 then....sachin at 37 year (2010) scored a double hundred in ODI itself 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️...and you where saying sachin took few more matches to reach lara‘s record....HEY GENIUS. ...Sachin was just 16 when he made debut while lara was 21 years...Sachin just took 15 innings more than lara to reach his record but he has played 45 innings from 16 years to lara’s test debut age !!,!
Believe me i have seen both these players play in different conditions... In my opinion Lara was overrated... Means even if he is playing at his best, he will play slow... Whereas Sachin was the best aggressive player I have ever seen.. He controlled his shots a lot for the nation... Otherwise towards the end of his carrer where team was stable we have seen how se scored 200 for the first time ever in men's cricket... Anyday, any comparison... SACHIN was goat no biasness... It's like, if it's guarantee that both players will play at least 100 balls then Lara... But surity to play a big innings everytime is SACHIN...
When you talk about the best technique then Sunil Gavaskar is the best because he played against the lethal fast bowlers in uncovered wickets. The next best is Mr. Rahul Dravid.
I left as soon he pronounced Brian as 'BRAIN' in the beginning of the video !!People who can't even pronounce or hold the bat properly have the balls to critique the greatest in their craft ,Can't get over it 😭
Sachin and Lara both were agressive batsman. But Sachin changed his game in test to score more runs and Lara played his natural game. Sachin had the luxury of batsman like Dravid, Laxman, Ganguly, Gambhir who could play defensively whereas Lara didn't have the same only Chanderpaul could play long innings. It's interesting to see Lara playing aggressively inspite of no defensive players. The result Lara played more match winning innings and Tendulkar scored more runs.
@@khushbookeshari8298sachin was the only only one who hide his disappointment in that 190s declare...don't talk rubbish just because you are jealous at someone...and all these lockdown kids keeps watching sachin‘ s 100th international century in 138 balls and decides it was how he played...but these fools don't known out of his 49 odi tons,. Only 2 had been slow ones and been pointed out as a bad centuries...they forgot the rest 47 hundreds , the 150s & 200 he made...he had never gone. Slow after getting set in crease...people talk that he use to slow down in 90s...The see some real numbers of strike rate in 90s of some indian players : sachin 91 (10.98 balls) , dhawan 92 (10.87 balls) , rohit 98 (10.20 balls)....remember that both rohit and dhawan debuted in t20 era while sachin debuted in 1989 during red ball odi era and scored 43 hundreds before 2005 !!! Kids now a days are obsessed with sixes and they will call a player aggressive even if he hits a six after playing 5 dot balls in a row and score 6 run in 6 balls, but calls a player who took singles in all these 6 balls😂😂..this is the case happened to sachin, now kohli becoming another example ...kohli is recorded to take 8.54 balls on an average in 90s...that is at 117 strike rate ,...but still called asa selfish player against rohit‘s 98 st rate, because rohit will have a Six hitted out of the park in those 10.20 balls he faces in 90s...
it is unfair to compare sachin debuted at 16 years with 21 year old lara, or sachin who retired at 40 years with a 37 year old lara ( APPLYING ESPN ADVANCED FILITER FROM SACHIN 20 years to 38 years FOR ACCURATE COMPARISON) . SACHIN. VS. LARA OVERALL AVE: 58.79 > 52.89 AWAY AVER. : 61.38 > 47.80 IN AUS : 64.11 > 41.97 IN ENG : 62.17 > 48.77 IN NZ : 55.76 > 36.91 IN SA : 50.47 > 46.72 lara in India : 33.00 Sachin in WI : 47.69 I cant understand why people are even comparing lara with sachin ...and some fools supporting lara for his home records ...a perfect home bully
The statement of after Sir DON ,, Sachin and Lara were two of the greatest batsmen. I disagree with that statement. I think Vivian Richards is definitely a bit better than Lara if not, Sachin.
Viv was more fearless.. totally agreed.. But Lara n Sachin for me are better all round players as they played a more variety of bowlers.. Spinners like Warne Kumble Saqlain Murli Left armers like Wasim Vaas etc But yes you've a point here
@@2605deepak But without helmet, with a flat wood bat not like today’s thick willow he used clear MCG boundaries with ease with a strike rate of 90 in those era is unimaginable
I can't believe how some people assume that Lara wasn't consistent enough! One player averages 52.88, while another averages 53.78. Lara remained not out in only 6 innings, with scores of 400*, 153* and 80* (2 match-winning innings). In contrast, Sachin was not out in 33 innings, with only one of them being a match-winner. Do people realize what Lara's average would be if he had played for avg? He is the only batsman in history who has scored over 5,000 runs while remaining not out only 6 times(2.5%). During his career, he contributed 20% of his team's total runs, while only Sir Don Bradman scored 23%. What consistency! Test matches cannot be determined by small scores like 70 or 80; it requires marathon innings. Sachin scored 5 Test centuries against the mighty Bangladesh, including a high score of 249*. If we only consider textbook cricket, then I don't think Sachin can be compared to Dravid, Kallis, and Sangakkara. Many Indians during that era just watched cricket for entertainment without doing any critical analysis. They just watched for fun.
Lara played from 20 - 37 years bro.. Sachin from 20-38 years has 13447 runs at 59.00 average in just 252 innings , including 46 hundreds…20 inning more than Lara ,1494 more, 12 hundreds more in that 20 innings…comparing his records at 16or 17 with Lara who played only in prime age is rubbish…also in test cricket, being not out is not considered under statpaddling…it’s a strength
Lara started playing late because the West Indies team at that time made it difficult for anyone to create opportunities in that world-class side. Do you know what the condition of the West Indies Cricket Board was during Lara's playing years? If he had a backing board like Tendulkar, who was pushed to break records by the board conducting Bangladesh tour, Lara could have played until he was 40 and scored over 50 centuries with a high average and runs,( just check laras record from 2003. )He retired from Test cricket partly because of the West Indies Board. However, we need to consider their entire careers; otherwise, we might argue that Shane Bond was better than Wasim Akram. In the mid-90s, Tendulkar was indeed very good, but after suffering from tennis elbow, there was little difference between Tendulkar and Dravid and others. That is a fact. I'm not saying I would place Lara ahead of Sachin in ODIs, but in Test cricket and pure batsmanship, nobody is close to Lara.
@@arkamukherjee6802 Lara started playing late because it was difficult to get space in the team, and Sachin played early because Indian team was very weak. But most of the people make claim for Lara's greatness by saying he played in a weak team. So what is it? was WI team weak or strong. Sachin played so long that most of the pundits and cricketers remember him for his record from 2003 to 2013. But those were the years, where Sachin could not play with full potential due to Tennis elbow injury.
The question itself is disrespectful to Sachin. To decide who is better we have to stick to objective metrics and not subjective criteria such as who was more talented or whose shots were more beautiful to watch. Sachin's consistency over 24 years, across all formats of the game, makes him the greatest batsman of the modern era. Others might be great but they are below him.
Impact in ODI innings - Lara better than Sachin...Reason the latter has better records in ODI is the selfishness to occupy the opening slot, so get to bat more balls and so get more opportunities for records
Run per innings (ball per innings) : sachin :(16-39 years) 40.87 (47.27) Lara (21-37 years): 36.00 ( 45.28) sachin (21-37 years) : 43.14 ( 49.16) sachin at same age period of lara scores 7.14 runs more facing 3.88 ball more than lara ( 184 strike rate in that extra balls) sachin overall scores 4.87 runs more than lara facing 1.99 balls extra ( 244.72 strike rate in those extra balls) yeah...lara is more impactfull and sachin wasted balls, and you need to attend 2nd standard maths one more time🤣🤣
it is unfair to compare sachin debuted at 16 years with 21 year old lara, or sachin who retired at 40 years with a 37 year old lara ( APPLYING ESPN ADVANCED FILITER FROM SACHIN 20 years to 38 years FOR ACCURATE COMPARISON) . SACHIN. VS. LARA OVERALL AVE: 58.79 > 52.89 AWAY AVER. : 61.38 > 47.80 IN AUS : 64.11 > 41.97 IN ENG : 62.17 > 48.77 IN NZ : 55.76 > 36.91 IN SA : 50.47 > 46.72 lara in India : 33.00 Sachin in WI : 47.69 I cant understand why people are even comparing lara with sachin ...and some fools supporting lara for his home records ...a perfect home bully if he is hailed only for his 400, 375 etc then karun nair & sehwag are best indian test batsmen...or gayle is better than viv in both test & odi...or even wasim akram with 257* is better than sachin, kane joe root🤣🤣
Nice video. As an indian we are little biased towards Sachin. However, as a cricket fan in terms of batting ability, Lara was ahead of Sachin in Tests. In ODI , sachin was better than Lara. Sachin was an opener that was also an advantage. Overall as i said, in terms of watching, Lara is slightly better than Sachin. This is my opinion :)
@@uttamghosh8609 uski opinion tere jaise biased fans ke liye matter kar gaya tabi tuu reply kar raha hai test me Lara bht consistent tha usne bola too hai ki odi me sachin better tha aur agar baat pressure ki hai too sachin ne bhi KOs me kuch bht jada nhi ukhada hai agar yahi baat hai fir too Ricky ponting>>>>>sachin kio k Ricky icc KOs me choke nhi krta tha strong teams ke smne itne andhbhakt mat bana kro Sachin indian cricket ka Goat hai par overall cricket world me bht players hai jo usi list me ate hai jisme wo tha yee too as a indian humri biasedness hai ki hume lagta hai sachin se bada koi aya hi nhi Nobody give F about 100 100s at the end of the day as a team achievements matter krti hai
@@ranjotrakkar6663bro 1990's ke Sachin ko dekha kya tune...front foot and back foot dono me kaun accha hai...Lara ka back foot weak hai ...Lara ne kitne high class pull shot khela...Lara 360 degree player nhi hai..Lara seaming and bouncy track pe kharab khelta hai Sachin Se...Lara ne sirf muralidharan ko accha khela Sachin se ek sl series me...Sachin ne har famous bowler ko accha khela Lara se...Lara ka technique and defence komjor hai Sachin se...Sachin ne even wi me bhi walch, Ambrose ko accha khela ,usi series me Lara Indian bowlers nehra ko nhi khel paya..aur sun na Chahta hai to reply karna..bohot points baki hai
You cant tell me if lara played 70 test matches again jus to make 4000 runs again knowing lara hunger for big runs big hundreds he would of easily made 4000 runs tendulker is a great batsman a young player growing up could learn from him people tend to give tedulker the edge but we would be having a different discussiin if lara played 200 test. There is a man call joe root jus saying.
But I have some issues also .please sir thode long format videos daliye apke solo.. and please do a video on ms dhoni as a batsmen in his entire journey . I think captain ms overshadowed his batting brilliance. Hit like agr sbhi ko aisa lgta hai to .
@@AnkitPandey-wv8kxagainst spin he always had a forward press.. Quick hands n brilliant hand eye coordination.. Modern spinners thoda quick karte hain n wickets mein zaada rakhte hain toh aapko ball ke under aane ka time kam milta hai.. aise mein declining reflexes ke saath bohot limited game ban jaati hai.. this even happened with Sachin in the later part of his career..
Sir do you think vk is facing the same kind of issue as he is approaching to his last years . Hope not bcz he hasn't reach his full potential as a test batsmen yet
Sachin ke 177 test mai 57 ki average thi test mai jo lara ki overall average se kahi jyada hai.... Lekin last ke match kuch kharab chale gye.. Baaki odi mai jab bhi pressure aaya aur bada score ho to lara ka mod defensive tha but tendulkar chahe saamne wasim ho McGrath ho styen ho pressure mai hamesha attacking mod mai sachin ne khela.. To sachin ke uppar to lara kahi se bhi nhi hai.. Aur overall cricketer to sachin hi tha.. Best batsman with underrated bowler Sachin sachin ❤❤❤❤
Statistically he is the greatest player ever lived. My fav. All rounder ever. 292 test wickets and 45 Test Hundred with I think over 180 catches is just making me paranoid. I am not even adding his ODI exploits.
Yes bro we had a small discussion about him in our Pak vs Bangladesh live telecast.. He was one of my favorite cricketers before the match fixing incident.. not sure if today's generation would connect with him that much
Which Topic we should Cover Next ? 🤔🤔 Comment Down ⬇⬇
Please talk about Javagal Srinath as a bowler as compared to modern indian Quick bowlers.
@@firstumpire you can cover any topic but please don't give those examples of Innovation..Lara was innovative so was ahead of Sachin there. Surya is most innovative means he is ahead of Kohli
Glenn mcgrath
@@firstumpire Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxman, Kumble, Harbhajan, Sehwag, Yuvraj
@@firstumpire Great video, you have a new subscriber ! I am a huge sourav ganguly fan! I believe dada the batsman is extremely underrated, and his captaincy had overshadowed his batting. He was a great batsman too!
I request you to please post a video on this topic, thanks!
Out of Sachin’s 100 centuries, India won 53 matches and drawn 20 matches and lost 27 times.
In many cases Sachin century was not enough because other batsmen failed to score. For me Sachin’s batting truly feels like a poetry. Whether it was his straight drives, the mastery over spin, or his adaptability across formats and conditions it’s just phenomenal.
Not to forget Sanath Jayasurya who was another contemporary legend in his time
😊
No one adapted the changing times and variables like Sachin.
Except in fourth innings of test match..... hero worship band karo
@@kaustubhgandhalikar5433 jnl
@@kaustubhgandhalikar5433 plz don't teach me what I need to do or not to do. There is space for opinions and I'm entitled to my views like everyone as long as it doesn't hurt anyone.
@@kaustubhgandhalikar5433 chennai vs pakistan and chennai vs England bhul gya
@@Suraj-h7t 2 occasions out of 350 plus total innings is not even a sample size. Vs Pakistan we lost. He could not do 16 more runs. Clearly he could not handle saqlain Mushtaq and got out hitting. Pls don't argue on his 4th innings average. You will get nothing. Test matches are always won or lost in 4th innings. I am from Mumbai I am also fan of his craft but definitely he was not there when it matters. Pains to mention this but that's the truth. All his imperious innings have come in losing cause it's a fact. 114 at Perth 169 in south Africa 116 at MCG and 136 at Chennai. Pls think twice before mentioning his ability to adapt and still if you need to mention then pls put 1st innings brilliance. He is the closest to batting perfection. That's it.
According to me since 90s to till now i.e. present year 2024,
Top 5 Greatest Batsman, Pacer, Spinner and the greatest cricketer since 90s to till now i.e. present year 2024 -
🔸Batsman :
1. Sachin Tendulkar
2. Brian Lara
3. Virat Kohli
4. Ricky Ponting
5. Ab de Villiers
🔸Pacers :
1. Glenn McGrath
2. Wasim Akram
3. Dale Steyn
4. Curtly Ambrose
5. Jasprit Bumrah
🔸Spinners :
1. Shane Warne
2. Muralitharan
3. Anil Kumble
4. Saqlain Mushtaq
5. Ravichandran Ashwin
🔸Greatest Cricketer since 90s to till now i.e. present year 2024 : Jacques Kallis
Amazing list bro
As a batsmen kohli Will be ahead of brain Lara any day
Kohli On Top Soon 💪= Sachin 💪
Kohli ki jgha Jayasuriya
AB ki jgha Michael Bevan
लिस्ट बढ़िया है, लेकिन जहा तक रैंकिंग की बात है वहा टैलेंट से ज्यादा सीनियारीटी और सन्मान को ज्यादा तवज्जो दिया गया है
Probably the best analyst these days.. and i watched literally everyone from 2003-04 era where the quality was really good on news channels. Sir if you can do a collab with vikrant sir . Please expand your reach
Thanks a ton bro 🙏 😊
Tendulkar has great backup support in co batsman. Lara didn't. Also Lara played most of his match in unfriendly batting fast bowler track whereas Sachin played in batting friendly asian pitch
look at their stats, Lara averages 58 at home against 52 for Sachin, Sachin averages 50 in NZL, ENGland and Australia, Lara averages only 41. Sachin has played more than half of his innings outside India which is 40% for Lara. Lara struggled in England, Australia, NZL, India and Pakistan. Sachin struggled only in South Africa where he still averaged 46 same as Lara. Lara played most of his Innings in Flat West Indian Wickets and struggled everywhere else other than SriLanka(Again Flat Spin Friendly wickets), But still failed in Pakistan and India(Spin friendly Flat wickets) Except 3 of the greatest innings played in test Cricket, Lara was quite ordinary batsman.
सचिन को जबर्दस्ती बीसीसीआई ढोया है।
Lara was also backed by Chanderpaul Carl hooper etc. 90s was same for both. After 90s Gayle, Ramnaresh Sarwan etc. Lara also was captain like sachin. There is no comparison between both were legends.
@@sherrysingh25 u cannot compare a hooper with Dravid or even Azhar. Chandrapaul yes was a good batsman. In case of West Indies batting load was more or less in hands of Lara n Chanderpaul
@@MrAmitabh35 during 90s load was on Sachin and Jadeja same equation
Brian Lara has the Highest Individual Score in Tests & First Class
Sachin was the World's First (Male) Batsman to Scored ODI 200
Schin is the World's Highest Run Scorer and has the World's Highest Centuries (100)
Sachin actually made Cricket as a Sport Popular and it was Cricket that made Lara famous
In the 1990s, Sachin literally was the Whole & Sole of Indian Cricket Team. At a time when the Team was dominated by Fixers such as Azharuddin, Sidhu, Jadeja, Mongia, Prabhakar etc, Sachin always stood tall. The West Indies in the 90s had a lot of Stalwarts apart from Lara i.e. Curtly Ambrose, Gayle, Chandrapal etc.
Azharuddin, Jadeja and Siddhu were never proven to be fixers. Also, in the '90s the Windies' downfall began. Windies never won any tournaments and series after 1995 and only Brian Lara was carrying the side. Meanwhile, in 90's we have Rahul and Ganguly making their debut and Azhar was in peak form in the early 90's. Sachin was shouldering a lot of responsibility but only batting cannot win matches. As the India team evolved, Sachin's batting flair began to shine and he grew as the strategies and began to contribute more with the ball as well. Meanwhile, Lara was flamboyant because Windies was such a strong team when Lara made his debut and it did not change much.
Tendulker Carry the entire national single handedly especially in the team in which other 10 players were fixers. Tendulker by far the most complete batsman ever lived.
Lol bro Windies team was not any better than India during most of Lara's career. In fact, India's batting for most of Tendulkar's career (with Azharuddin, Dravid, Ganguly, Laxman, Sehwag) in team, Tendulkar had a better batting line-up to rely on.
Tendulkar might as well be Lara (worth debating I am not sure) but please stop reverse-engineering reasons to tell yourself that Tendulkar is better than everyone.
@@ABBartan There is a big difference when it comes to a weak team and a team in which the other 10 players are fixers. A weak team has at least some intention to play. in the second option, players play for the opposition team. it's like Tendulkar vs 21 players.
Not all are fixer.. except few 3-4 players .. Don't finger the dignity of Ganguly, Dravid, Kumble, Srinath , and many more like those.. only jadeja, Azhar and the kingpin manoj prabhakar were bastards @@punitnaik
Who told you other 10 were fixers ?
How many matches were fixed ?
How many did you fix ?
@@ABBartan true
These are the sort of videos I am even willing to join a UA-cam channel membership for. That's how original the cricket discussions on this channel are, not bland cricket reporting. Keep up it up !
Excellent quality of discussion. Please keep doing what you do. Never stop!
Tendulkar ka stance itna perfect tha ki unko dekhne keliye log bhid me aate the ..agar us time pe insta hota to aaj sachin tendulkar k 400 millions se b jyada fan followers ho jaate ya fur usse b jyada hote ...he is awesme player
lara ki batting mai jo magic thaa wo kisi mai nhi thaa
Sachin's batting is like standard text book for batting
Lara was a pure entertainer of the highest magnitude. I take to watch cricket is for entertainment. So my most fav cricketer is Brian Lara any day.
Sir Viv Richard's jesa bestman koi nhi
Once set, its almost impossible to get Laras wicket. That's the reason why he was able to achieve 375, 400, 500-+ in an innings.Lara when in mood, completely dominated the bowlers we used to clearly see that bowlers surrender to his batting class & they don't know how to get him out.
Where in Sachin on the other hand even after scoring a double hundred, used to poke the ball outside the off stump. That's why he couldn't make a 250 in 24 years of cricket.
I had the privilege of watching both of these legends bat, in my opinion Brian Charless Lara was a better batsman.
but consistency is also important..lara was a big innings plyer but not consistent like tendulkar..the correct terms should be ‘better’ for sachin & ‘dangerous’ for lara
@@arvinds-cs1sm agree to some extent on the technical aspects of batting. But you can't compare sachin with Brian charless when they were in full flow. Lara becomes Don brafman when he was in full flow - bowlers can't get him - threy only need to wait until he makes a mistake.
@@RavinderRajGuru we can't say that also...
One a 100+ scores,
lara had stayed notout only 2/34 times
has declared only 1/34 times ( that too after reaching the peakmost acheivement 400* - in course drawning a grabbable match)
on other hand , sachin had stayed 17/51 hundreds notout...exactly 1/3rd...(either match ended as draw or team was allout)
9/51 times India declared the innings to try to win the match, 7 of which are 150+ scores (including that 194*)...in short, while playing a 100+ innings, it. Was sachin who was really left untouched/unbeaten the most !!! He never had the chance to show his full potential in 33.33% of his centuries, while lara couldn't play a full innings only 2.9% ( or simply just 1 innings , if we consider 400* as a full innings that could be played)....
Don't forget that in oneball -ODI ( when only 1 ball was used and reverse swing worked for last 10 overs), sachin was the only man to score a 200 and held the most 150+ scores record....(others started scoring 200s & multiple 150s only after one ball in odi was changed to 2 new balls from both end , so that reverse swing will be absent and batsmen can play last 10-15 overs in t20 style)
Expectations + injury + lack of trusted player 1993 to 1999 = led him change his playing style aggressive & calculative risk player to moderate inning player.
Later half after 2007 again change in batting style reminder of younger days .
Tremendous level of expectations from Sachin in 1990s ! ♥️
As a batsman it's all about pitch and conditions. In Indian subcontinent not only Lara but no one in the world around Sachin. You just can't imagine that someone can bat better than Sachin in our pitches and conditions while in the sena countries there are many competitive names like Lara, ponting and others. Even VVS Laxman has his own class particularly in Australia which perhaps even no Australian batter can achieve.
Who is rating VVS Laxman higher in Australia against Australian batsmen like Ricky Ponting Mark Waugh and Damien Martin. Pls. Guys don't hero worship only indian batsmen. I am an ardent VVS Laxman fan but I also have to accept that he doesn't have a single Test Hundred in England.
When it comes to art of play, timing to cricket ball and beautiful to watch laxman was better than ponting but he needs some true bounce and conditions. He wasn't that tough and hard to cricket ball so he could not been competitive in so many conditions and cricket like odi or T20 but he was simply treated to watch.
Tendulkar - ODI cricket
Lara - Test cricket
I am glad I found this channel where stories were being analysed and purani yaade yaad aa jati hai cricket ka.
Thanks for the Feedback 😊 It really Motivates us a Lot !💯
Best cricket analysis I have ever seen. Thanks bro. You look honest, you speak honest and analyse very very honest.
Even ricky ponting was also a great batsmen because even after capatinacy pressure for long time he continued to perform well.
Sir please make a video on how australia won wc 2023 final match 😢😢 and how south africa chased highest ever total in odi aganist australia
2023 finals still gives me nightmares bro but I'll surely try it
सचिन खेलते थे तो सारी गलियां सुनी पड़ जाती थी और सचिन आउट तो सारे टीवी सेट भी बंद.
Great video, you have a new subscriber ! I am a huge sourav ganguly fan! I believe dada the batsman is extremely underrated, and his captaincy had overshadowed his batting. He was a great batsman too!
I request you to please post a video on this topic, thanks!
That Dada was great batsman with 7000 test runs even Dada will not agree probably.
@@kaustubhgandhalikar5433 he scored those runs mostly at number 5 and 6. Apart from players like Chanderpaul and steve waugh, tell me how many players have scored 10k runs batting at that position? Laxman had scored 8k runs, does it mean he was not one of the finest test batsman of india? No, it was because he himself batted at that position in which it’s required to play with the tail and you do not have much opportunity to score big runs.
Plus dada was the captain of the team so he had to manage the team as well not solely focusing on his batting. Even after all this the guy scored more than 7k test runs, which clearly tells me that he was a great test batsman apart from being one of the greatest batsman in the odi format
Brother you are entitled to your opinion, FOR US, SACHIN IS UNDERRATED AND SHOULD BE GIVEN EVEN MORE CREDIT
I feel being an Indian, this time you erred in analyzing thoroughly and passing on the verdict
Found gold in this channel 💛
Agreed with everything, you're right, but no one can write a ball, this will never happen again. That's sachin tendulkar
You should have included Kallis in the discussion, the most complete cricketer of the modern era.
सचिन और लारा दोनों ही अपने वक्त के ग्रेटेस्ट बैट्समैन थे लेकिन अगर देखा जाए तो सर सचिन तेंदुलकर बहुत बड़े क्रिकेटर हैं. उन्होंने क्रिकेट 24 साल तक खेला. 1 अरब 21 करोड लोगों की उम्मीदों के बोझ को अपने कंधों पर रखकर देश के लिए खेला है. सचिन वन मैन आर्मी थे. वर्ल्ड क्रिकेट में अब सचिन से बड़ा प्लेयर ना कभी आया है ना आएगा. अगर सर सचिन तेंदुलकर इस समय क्रिकेट खेल रहे होते तो उनके 200+ से ज्यादा इंटरनैशनल सेंचुरी होती. क्योंकि 90s में पिचेस बहुत ही ज्यादा खतरनाक थी और साथ ही जिस तरह के क्वालिटी बॉलर थे जैसे वसीम अकरम, वकार यूनिस, सकलैन मुश्ताक, शोएब अख्तर, वास, मुरलीधर, एंब्रोस, वाल्स, डोनाल्ड, पोलक, ग्लेन मैकग्रैथ, शेन वार्न, ब्रेट ली. ये सारे के बड़े खतरनाक हुआ करते थे. इनके सामने खड़ा होना भी बड़ी बात थी.
The discussion is not complete without Kallis the greatest complete cricketer of the modern era.
Lara test match me bhi kafi attacking tarike se khelte the aur bahut badi innings khelne k liye Jane jate the jabki Sachin test me thoda sa Aram se khelte the
Main aapki video 2 month se dekh raha hu
Subscribe aaj kiya
Mene Pehli baar m kr dia tha england k test k waqt kia tha quality badhi hi jaa rhi h content ki
Once again a great Video Sir...
They will always say tendulker is better but i wish lara would of played 200 test matches this man would of made 20000 test runs
Tendulkar had good batsman players in Indian team behind him ..Lara was one many army in west indies team .. Tendulkar played without pressure and he was opener .. Lara payed and won more matches of his Own single handed .. He played under immense pressure .. Tendulkar was a running machine. ..both players are supreme in their own ways...
What ???
He played with ,viv Richards, chanderpaul,Carl Hooper ,desmond heyons, Richardson, and two of the best fast bowlers in cricket history walsh and Ambrose,,
@@sanchit7100 he played with VIV ,Desmond, Richardson, Hooper, Chanderpaul, Sarwan, Gayle, Walsh, Ambrose. Kya funk ke like date ho. 90's WI Team had better cricketers than 90's Indian team.
@@KKpandita88 bro you replied to my comment 😂😂, I was replying to orignal comment and trying to tell him that lara played with better cricketers than srt
There were only 3 blue blooded batsmen till date, Sir Don Bradman, Brian Lara and Sachin.
तेंदुलकर की तुलना लारा से नहीं बनती, मैं लारा को भी पसंद करता हूँ, लारा और तेंदुलकर को टेस्ट खेलते हुए देखा
लारा की हाइप ऑस्ट्रेलिया इंग्लैंड पाकिस्तान के कुछ मुख्य गेंदबाजो द्वारा क्रिएट की गयी
सचिन की सुप्रीमेसी से बचने के लिये
इन लोगों में सचिन को लेकर हीन भावना थी
टेस्ट में अच्छे लक्ष्मण की कौन बात करता है जबकि युवराज की हाइप देखिये
सो काल्ड क्रिकेट जीनियस टेस्ट का भले शोर मचाते हों, मगर हाइप one day से बनती थी उस जमाने में
इतना आसान थोड़े है दोनों को पृथक करके देखना
Lara and tendulkar were match winners while ponting was a cup winner. And that too with the pressure of captaincy
thumbnail is great btw i have subscribed
Thanks bro
@@2605deepak feel grateful to have a reply from you I was watching the channel from the ind vs eng series . Ritesh and your's chemistry is the best among all other anchors and please dont call me bro I'm 16.😆😅
Great explanation sir ❤
But more focus should be on statistics and yearly and format driven data specific analysis
Love ur videos ❤❤
I totally agree with you..
I had that in mind but I was not sure if audience would like it or not..
Too many numbers might distract them or might make it boring for them.. but surely I will give it a try in future..
Thanks for the suggestions.. ❤
Nice video , thanks for the same.
Can you please make a video on India's failure in 2015, 2019 -50 over world cups
Why are we so obsessed only with Lara and Sachin when Ponting and Kallis were also there
No Comparison between both and because both were some of the GOATs. Please talk about Javagal Srinath as a bowler as compared to modern indian Quick bowlers.
Thanks for the response of my comments
🙏😊
Saurav Ganguly as a player par bhi ek dedicated video banaiye...
Surely
Am huge fan of sachin since childhood but in tests lara is better the ability to play long innings
Sir your analysis are absolutely on spot and it is better in monologue mode.
However sir, we would like to know about yourself. How much u have played and pls flaunt ur IIT credentials.
Just as what Harsha Bhogle does of IIMA.
It will add an authenticity to ur viewers
Thanks for the compliments bro.. Harsha is legendary.. He is solely responsible for bringing the professionalism in sports presentations in India.. what he did in that era is truely remarkable.. very few would realize but he is almost my dad's age 😂
I'm building India's biggest Web3 and Blockchain community under the banner of Crewsphere: ICP India Hub along with my cofounders.. Cricket is my passion and have no plans to carve out a career or a side career out of it.. it's a meditative experience for me n I'm extremely lucky to have an amazing team which made it possible for me with my minimal efforts 🙏😊
Lara had better hands for sure. He was the best placer of the cricket ball.
Sachin broke Lara's record in more matches . Lara scored more runs in pressure and bowlers feared him more than Tendulkar. Just recently saw the podcast of Jarrod kimber where he said that he asked something like 70+ world class batters that who was a better batsmen and 80-90% said LARA. Sachin had a better defensive technique than Lara but Lara was a destroyer of bowling of any sorts. Sachin had longevity which is a sign of greatness but everyone knows his last 3 years and the struggles while Lara scored double hundreds for fun in his last year. ( 2006 ). Sachin had the likes of Laxman Dravid sehwag while Lara played with Chandrapaul. Enough said. Lara the greater batsmen , sachin prolly greater career with WC wins and etc
Ask Alan Donald about Sachins defence in south Africa.
Off stump cartwheeling towards Dave Richardson is still a national treasure over there.
@@kaustubhgandhalikar5433
And same Allan Donald called Sachin Tendulkar as the best ever batsman, not Lara or Ponting. Sachin got out more than 300 times in tests and 400+ times in odd. So what is your point? A batsman cannot get out. Bradman came under pressure only once in his last test innings and got out for "DUCK". Have you seen Lara's stumps scattered by Waqar Younis and SHoab Akhtar on many times. Get some space man.
are you fool or dumb ???👀👀👀 Lara scored double hundred in test in last year, but he was only 37 then....sachin at 37 year (2010) scored a double hundred in ODI itself 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️...and you where saying sachin took few more matches to reach lara‘s record....HEY GENIUS. ...Sachin was just 16 when he made debut while lara was 21 years...Sachin just took 15 innings more than lara to reach his record but he has played 45 innings from 16 years to lara’s test debut age !!,!
Believe me i have seen both these players play in different conditions...
In my opinion Lara was overrated...
Means even if he is playing at his best, he will play slow...
Whereas Sachin was the best aggressive player I have ever seen.. He controlled his shots a lot for the nation... Otherwise towards the end of his carrer where team was stable we have seen how se scored 200 for the first time ever in men's cricket...
Anyday, any comparison... SACHIN was goat no biasness...
It's like, if it's guarantee that both players will play at least 100 balls then Lara... But surity to play a big innings everytime is SACHIN...
Nice joke
Sachin Tendulkar is legand player and best
Sachin was natural talent , genius and great stroke player .. slightly ahead of Lara
Sachin not natural talent
@@PriyanshuKumar-xe1om He is! Naturally talented and Flamboyant
Lara was beautiful to watch bat, 90's Sachin was also a beautiful batsman. But on stats Sachin anyday
When you talk about the best technique then Sunil Gavaskar is the best because he played against the lethal fast bowlers in uncovered wickets. The next best is Mr. Rahul Dravid.
Please make video on sachin vs ponting
Yuvraj Singh ki pure life aur career pr ek show kijiye wo v lamba show kijiye please..
I left as soon he pronounced Brian as 'BRAIN' in the beginning of the video !!People who can't even pronounce or hold the bat properly have the balls to critique the greatest in their craft ,Can't get over it 😭
Sachin and Lara both were agressive batsman. But Sachin changed his game in test to score more runs and Lara played his natural game.
Sachin had the luxury of batsman like Dravid, Laxman, Ganguly, Gambhir who could play defensively whereas Lara didn't have the same only Chanderpaul could play long innings.
It's interesting to see Lara playing aggressively inspite of no defensive players. The result Lara played more match winning innings and Tendulkar scored more runs.
Nice show 😊
🙏😊
Donald Bradman ke baad 2 sabse best batsmens ??? What about Garry Sobers, Viv Richards and Sunil gavaskar..........????
Sachin is the greatest cricketer
Greatest (Selfish) Cricketer in a team game, who always cribbed about one missed double hundred ;-)
@@khushbookeshari8298sachin was the only only one who hide his disappointment in that 190s declare...don't talk rubbish just because you are jealous at someone...and all these lockdown kids keeps watching sachin‘ s 100th international century in 138 balls and decides it was how he played...but these fools don't known out of his 49 odi tons,. Only 2 had been slow ones and been pointed out as a bad centuries...they forgot the rest 47 hundreds , the 150s & 200 he made...he had never gone. Slow after getting set in crease...people talk that he use to slow down in 90s...The see some real numbers of strike rate in 90s of some indian players :
sachin 91 (10.98 balls) , dhawan 92 (10.87 balls) , rohit 98 (10.20 balls)....remember that both rohit and dhawan debuted in t20 era while sachin debuted in 1989 during red ball odi era and scored 43 hundreds before 2005 !!!
Kids now a days are obsessed with sixes and they will call a player aggressive even if he hits a six after playing 5 dot balls in a row and score 6 run in 6 balls, but calls a player who took singles in all these 6 balls😂😂..this is the case happened to sachin, now kohli becoming another example ...kohli is recorded to take 8.54 balls on an average in 90s...that is at 117 strike rate ,...but still called asa selfish player against rohit‘s 98 st rate, because rohit will have a Six hitted out of the park in those 10.20 balls he faces in 90s...
One little suggestion in every 6 second changing camera angle is Lil bit Disturbing
A few fast bowlers shook up Lara up big time none ever them did that to Tendulkar
Lara better in test cricket which is where it counts.
If batting is a subject then Sachin is its profesor
Sachin Tendulkar ❤
it is unfair to compare sachin debuted at 16 years with 21 year old lara, or sachin who retired at 40 years with a 37 year old lara ( APPLYING ESPN ADVANCED FILITER FROM SACHIN 20 years to 38 years FOR ACCURATE COMPARISON)
. SACHIN. VS. LARA
OVERALL AVE: 58.79 > 52.89
AWAY AVER. : 61.38 > 47.80
IN AUS : 64.11 > 41.97
IN ENG : 62.17 > 48.77
IN NZ : 55.76 > 36.91
IN SA : 50.47 > 46.72
lara in India : 33.00
Sachin in WI : 47.69
I cant understand why people are even comparing lara with sachin ...and some fools supporting lara for his home records ...a perfect home bully
The statement of after Sir DON ,, Sachin and Lara were two of the greatest batsmen. I disagree with that statement. I think Vivian Richards is definitely a bit better than Lara if not, Sachin.
Viv was more fearless.. totally agreed..
But Lara n Sachin for me are better all round players as they played a more variety of bowlers..
Spinners like Warne Kumble Saqlain Murli
Left armers like Wasim Vaas etc
But yes you've a point here
I feel viv was more fearless. Viv has test avg of 50 at that time plenty of batsman had 50 + avg. In ODI viv was ahead of his time.
Vivian was greatest but he also had an advantage that he never had to face his own teammates.😂😂
@@2605deepak But without helmet, with a flat wood bat not like today’s thick willow he used clear MCG boundaries with ease with a strike rate of 90 in those era is unimaginable
Sachin was the closest thing to batting perfection with only blot was his fourth innings insipid performances ironically.
Sir , can u pls make a video on top4 left-hand batsman according to u .
LARA WAS MUCH MORE GRACEFUL & AGGRESSIVE, BUT SACHIN EDGES OVER IN - TECHNIQUE, DEFENSE & CONSISTENCY
It's unfair to compare the batting prowess of Sachin Tendulkar & Brian Lara
Nice❤
Till Azhar was around Sachin was second best with all due respect to GOD of cricket
In onw day cricket Sachin was an opening batsman while lara was a middle order batsman. Debate here seems to be irrational
Tendulkar gave world cricket the
Money sponsors
I can't believe how some people assume that Lara wasn't consistent enough! One player averages 52.88, while another averages 53.78. Lara remained not out in only 6 innings, with scores of 400*, 153* and 80* (2 match-winning innings). In contrast, Sachin was not out in 33 innings, with only one of them being a match-winner. Do people realize what Lara's average would be if he had played for avg? He is the only batsman in history who has scored over 5,000 runs while remaining not out only 6 times(2.5%). During his career, he contributed 20% of his team's total runs, while only Sir Don Bradman scored 23%. What consistency! Test matches cannot be determined by small scores like 70 or 80; it requires marathon innings. Sachin scored 5 Test centuries against the mighty Bangladesh, including a high score of 249*. If we only consider textbook cricket, then I don't think Sachin can be compared to Dravid, Kallis, and Sangakkara. Many Indians during that era just watched cricket for entertainment without doing any critical analysis. They just watched for fun.
Lara played from 20 - 37 years bro.. Sachin from 20-38 years has 13447 runs at 59.00 average in just 252 innings , including 46 hundreds…20 inning more than Lara ,1494 more, 12 hundreds more in that 20 innings…comparing his records at 16or 17 with Lara who played only in prime age is rubbish…also in test cricket, being not out is not considered under statpaddling…it’s a strength
Lara started playing late because the West Indies team at that time made it difficult for anyone to create opportunities in that world-class side. Do you know what the condition of the West Indies Cricket Board was during Lara's playing years? If he had a backing board like Tendulkar, who was pushed to break records by the board conducting Bangladesh tour, Lara could have played until he was 40 and scored over 50 centuries with a high average and runs,( just check laras record from 2003. )He retired from Test cricket partly because of the West Indies Board. However, we need to consider their entire careers; otherwise, we might argue that Shane Bond was better than Wasim Akram. In the mid-90s, Tendulkar was indeed very good, but after suffering from tennis elbow, there was little difference between Tendulkar and Dravid and others. That is a fact. I'm not saying I would place Lara ahead of Sachin in ODIs, but in Test cricket and pure batsmanship, nobody is close to Lara.
@@arkamukherjee6802 Lara started playing late because it was difficult to get space in the team, and Sachin played early because Indian team was very weak.
But most of the people make claim for Lara's greatness by saying he played in a weak team. So what is it? was WI team weak or strong.
Sachin played so long that most of the pundits and cricketers remember him for his record from 2003 to 2013. But those were the years, where Sachin could not play with full potential due to Tennis elbow injury.
Make a video solely on match fixing in International Cricket
No one is overrated.
If you compare then you know nothing about cricket
Yuvraj Singh k Life aur career aur unka impact pr charcha kijiye please..
Definitely bro
The question itself is disrespectful to Sachin. To decide who is better we have to stick to objective metrics and not subjective criteria such as who was more talented or whose shots were more beautiful to watch.
Sachin's consistency over 24 years, across all formats of the game, makes him the greatest batsman of the modern era. Others might be great but they are below him.
Lara No.1 Batsman
Both are GOATS of their generation.
This GOATS concept will end after MESSI And RONALDO retirement.
Then their will be only one GOAT.
PLEASE DISCUSS ABOUT AUSTRALIA INDIA 2004 TEST SERIES IN INDIA, WHY INDIA LOST THE SERIES
Impact in ODI innings - Lara better than Sachin...Reason the latter has better records in ODI is the selfishness to occupy the opening slot, so get to bat more balls and so get more opportunities for records
Tests - no doubt, Lara the GOAT
Run per innings (ball per innings) :
sachin :(16-39 years) 40.87 (47.27)
Lara (21-37 years): 36.00 ( 45.28)
sachin (21-37 years) : 43.14 ( 49.16)
sachin at same age period of lara scores 7.14 runs more facing 3.88 ball more than lara ( 184 strike rate in that extra balls)
sachin overall scores 4.87 runs more than lara facing 1.99 balls extra ( 244.72 strike rate in those extra balls)
yeah...lara is more impactfull and sachin wasted balls, and you need to attend 2nd standard maths one more time🤣🤣
it is unfair to compare sachin debuted at 16 years with 21 year old lara, or sachin who retired at 40 years with a 37 year old lara ( APPLYING ESPN ADVANCED FILITER FROM SACHIN 20 years to 38 years FOR ACCURATE COMPARISON)
. SACHIN. VS. LARA
OVERALL AVE: 58.79 > 52.89
AWAY AVER. : 61.38 > 47.80
IN AUS : 64.11 > 41.97
IN ENG : 62.17 > 48.77
IN NZ : 55.76 > 36.91
IN SA : 50.47 > 46.72
lara in India : 33.00
Sachin in WI : 47.69
I cant understand why people are even comparing lara with sachin ...and some fools supporting lara for his home records ...a perfect home bully
if he is hailed only for his 400, 375 etc then karun nair & sehwag are best indian test batsmen...or gayle is better than viv in both test & odi...or even wasim akram with 257* is better than sachin, kane joe root🤣🤣
Nice video. As an indian we are little biased towards Sachin. However, as a cricket fan in terms of batting ability, Lara was ahead of Sachin in Tests. In ODI , sachin was better than Lara. Sachin was an opener that was also an advantage. Overall as i said, in terms of watching, Lara is slightly better than Sachin. This is my opinion :)
Your opinion does not matter bro...bcoz it is logical...than according to you Gayle is better than Sehwag...
Consistency and pressure matters....
Well said bruh
@@uttamghosh8609 uski opinion tere jaise biased fans ke liye matter kar gaya tabi tuu reply kar raha hai test me Lara bht consistent tha usne bola too hai ki odi me sachin better tha aur agar baat pressure ki hai too sachin ne bhi KOs me kuch bht jada nhi ukhada hai agar yahi baat hai fir too Ricky ponting>>>>>sachin kio k Ricky icc KOs me choke nhi krta tha strong teams ke smne itne andhbhakt mat bana kro Sachin indian cricket ka Goat hai par overall cricket world me bht players hai jo usi list me ate hai jisme wo tha yee too as a indian humri biasedness hai ki hume lagta hai sachin se bada koi aya hi nhi Nobody give F about 100 100s at the end of the day as a team achievements matter krti hai
@@ranjotrakkar6663bro 1990's ke Sachin ko dekha kya tune...front foot and back foot dono me kaun accha hai...Lara ka back foot weak hai ...Lara ne kitne high class pull shot khela...Lara 360 degree player nhi hai..Lara seaming and bouncy track pe kharab khelta hai Sachin
Se...Lara ne sirf muralidharan ko accha khela Sachin se ek sl series me...Sachin ne har famous bowler ko accha khela Lara se...Lara ka technique and defence komjor hai Sachin se...Sachin ne even wi me bhi walch, Ambrose ko accha khela ,usi series me Lara Indian bowlers nehra ko nhi khel paya..aur sun na
Chahta hai to reply karna..bohot points baki hai
Sir aisehi video virat kohli and Rohit Sharma pe video bnaiye
Virat we did a detailed podcast bro..
Rohit pe mujhe abhi WTC finals ke baad banaani hai.. unko jinx nahi karna hai abhi❤
Sachin was a perfect gentleman of Cricket even his batting was the same.
Brian Lara was a Rockstar of Cricket a Magnician..!!
You cant tell me if lara played 70 test matches again jus to make 4000 runs again knowing lara hunger for big runs big hundreds he would of easily made 4000 runs tendulker is a great batsman a young player growing up could learn from him people tend to give tedulker the edge but we would be having a different discussiin if lara played 200 test. There is a man call joe root jus saying.
But I have some issues also .please sir thode long format videos daliye apke solo.. and please do a video on ms dhoni as a batsmen in his entire journey . I think captain ms overshadowed his batting brilliance. Hit like agr sbhi ko aisa lgta hai to .
Totally agreed bro.. He is a white ball legend.. in many aspects
Then why his decline as batsmen itna khrab rha in 2015-19 time period . Is it bcz his unorthodox batting technique?? Please answer
@@AnkitPandey-wv8kxagainst spin he always had a forward press.. Quick hands n brilliant hand eye coordination..
Modern spinners thoda quick karte hain n wickets mein zaada rakhte hain toh aapko ball ke under aane ka time kam milta hai.. aise mein declining reflexes ke saath bohot limited game ban jaati hai.. this even happened with Sachin in the later part of his career..
Sir do you think vk is facing the same kind of issue as he is approaching to his last years . Hope not bcz he hasn't reach his full potential as a test batsmen yet
@@AnkitPandey-wv8kxwill plan a video soon on this
Lara is a gambler and Sachin is a piker..period..
अच्छा हुआ बकवास होस्ट से बचे,,,,बहुत बढ़िया वीडियो,,,
Sachin ke 177 test mai 57 ki average thi test mai jo lara ki overall average se kahi jyada hai....
Lekin last ke match kuch kharab chale gye..
Baaki odi mai jab bhi pressure aaya aur bada score ho to lara ka mod defensive tha but tendulkar chahe saamne wasim ho McGrath ho styen ho pressure mai hamesha attacking mod mai sachin ne khela..
To sachin ke uppar to lara kahi se bhi nhi hai..
Aur overall cricketer to sachin hi tha..
Best batsman with underrated bowler
Sachin sachin ❤❤❤❤
I think jaque kallis is the greatest batter in the last 30 years of test cricket
Statistically he is the greatest player ever lived. My fav. All rounder ever. 292 test wickets and 45 Test Hundred with I think over 180 catches is just making me paranoid. I am not even adding his ODI exploits.
nice points Deepak sir
please make a vdo on AJAY JADEJA
Yes bro we had a small discussion about him in our Pak vs Bangladesh live telecast..
He was one of my favorite cricketers before the match fixing incident.. not sure if today's generation would connect with him that much
@@2605deepak YES you said in that telecast that you will look to make a special video on his carrier and controversies
Lara
Lara one and only