Paul McCartney vs Billy Shears - voice comparison - "Here There and Everywhere"
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 лис 2022
- Recordings - Paul McCartney 1966 - 24 years and Billy Shears 1991 - 54 years.
@justiceforjamespaulmccartney
/ justicefor_jamespaulmc...
Not only does Faul’s voice have a different timbre, but his style, his phrasing is totally different. It’s not a matter of aging. As a performing musician myself, I think one’s style is akin to a fingerprint.
In this case, it’s not Faul’s song and he doesn’t know how to sing it. No emotional investment.
Thanks for the comment.
He does a right good impression that would fool those who didn't listen out for the comparrisions
A simple dna test will close this off.
Back in the Beatles Hamburg days, pauls German girlfriend fell pregnant. Brian Epstein made payment to the girl and set up maintenance payments until she reached adulthood. Her mother provided recorded evidence of these payments to a court in the 90s when the girl wanted access to her father. When McCartney appeared in court the girls mother swore under oath that he was an imposter. McCartney was ordered to provide a sample for dna testing which produced a negative result.
Go figure.......
Yep
Paul supported his child and girlfriend financially but a paternity test was done with Faul and it did not match.
@@danahsutton101 Do you have the evidence? Can you post it?
Paul has the voice of an angel. You do great work.
Thank you.
Paul was an angel
Imagine living a lie for all these years, but thinking about it, there must be something very dark going on behind all of this
Would be interesting who really is behind all of that stuff and who is giving the orders and why
Time will tell.
You guys wouldn’t believe it. Ever hear of the occult?
Read "The Memoirs of Billy Shears" and then validate the historical accuracy on the parts with which you are able - might be a lot to take in if you're not aware of upper echelon society and how they operate
Yes is creepy , isnt only a discography business , but also occultism and black magic.
Paul sung long notes with no verbrato. Faul sings short short notes with a hint of verbrato.
Poor ol’ Faulie, they never could conceive that there would be an internet that would expose the lies!
I'm not doubting Paul was replaced . But as a singer my younger days I could hit my higher notes . As I'm 60 now my vocal range has changed from my 20s.
Paul 1966. Billy 1991.
Ok but have in mind that Billy's wings songs even the hard ones like "nineteen hundred eighty five" are sounding very similar to those early days on performances from the 00's. Billy never really change his voice because he knows a lot about technique. That's the main proof, he just doesn't sound like Paul
I tend to be a purist. The original recordings were the purist form. They had to steal their PA equipment to play. That kicked out Stuart Sutcliff out. There were just kids who lost control because of their managers and gf's and wives or maybe just because of the lost a close friend or child or relative or someone they pissed off maybe like Keith Moon? Dont' know.
@@God-Was-Bored I agree! There is no reason why Paul would sound soo different now, then he did in the early 60’s. For example, lead singers from 2 bands that I love, The Rolling Stones and the Monkees, still sound the same. Mick Jagger and Micky Dolenz! Their voices have hardly changed. I’m just surprised that no one has spoken the truth about Paul. I think Heather Mills wanted to but was too scared.
Paul's style is also much more relaxed and fluid whereas Billy is choppy and broken.
Only one of these voices matches songs from Wings. They are a good reference point because you don't have to worry about "remastered " editions. Another advantage of owning originals Beatles albums.
I was lucky enough to work wtth a talented, albeit demanding choir director who had a thing about singers who had to shorten notes in order to sing them. It was one thing for choir members to do it because they seldom did it all at the same time so it wasn't noticable, but quite another for a soloist. In a soloist, in indicated either a breathing (therefore a phrasing) issue, or the sign of a weak voice. For me that is shown in the difference between an aging or aged singer like Bing Crosby, Andy Williams, or even someone like George Harrison as he got older, and Frank Sinatra, Gary Puckett (as early as the 80s) who had to 'cheat' to sing the song, and Faul who has had to cheat since Day One.
Thanks for the comment.
I agree! And there will always be a distinctness in everyone’s voice that doesn’t change with age in my experience and as a singer!
I must admit that Billy is a pretty good singer but not even all his technique can match JPM natural beautiful voice
Paul McCartney died and was replaced in 1966. I hope that one day Paul will find justice.
Paul's voice was so much clearer; like the voice of an angel. Billy's voice can't compare. I don't know how he got away with the deceptive lie for 60 years. When he joined the group I didn't like their style anymore and stopped buying the albums. I wish the truth would come out. I try waking people up, but they're in denial.
R.I.P James Paul McCartney. Faul can never compare to you.
It’s funny that people think Bill has been trying to hide that he’s not Paul. He has done what he was asked to do, and done it pretty dern well…but he’s been telling the esoteric seers/hearers from the beginning.
Faul can't even hold the tune of this song, along with not having the vocal range to sing it.
That's correct
Take note of the difference in how they sing “speaking.”
Does this mean revolver was the last album with real Paul
Yes.
Thank you for uploading this comparison. Seems a no brainer! My favourite JPM song and vocal performance.
Who wrote Peter & Gordon's Woman. Presume it's JPM but Faul played it during the Get Back sessions and talked about the version he played drums on enthusiastically. I almost bid on the acetate a few years ago but it went for silly money.
The high notes are effortless for Paul but a struggle for Bill.
I think Bill rather cursed himself when he released his secret memoirs. In them, he repeatedly states, as though it was a fact, that he has always sung better than Paul. He even says that, due to his training, he could still out sing Paul, even in his 70s. Well, Billy’s voice was ok up to the age of 50 but never as good as he claimed. Now, in his 80s, it’s completely shot. Listening to him sing in concert is frankly embarrassing. Also, when he sings Paul’s old repertoire, it has always been obvious that he is not Paul, as you have just shown. Frequently Billy seems to struggle to stay in key, which then affects his ability to hold onto long notes. Maybe it’s too high for him? In the studio, during to making on Sgt Pepper they had to artificially raise the tonality of his singing (by speeding it up) because he was too low and didn’t sound like Paul. It’s more difficult to do that live, even now. In an acoustic song like “Here, there and everywhere“, Billy is exposed as an imposter every time.
There is an scene in the documentary Let it Be in which "Paul" finds a paper stuck to the Hofner bass, where some songs are annotated. John tells "Paul" it's a setlist from an old live performance. Paul didn't know what the role was about?! Did he have amnesia? I believe it was a purposeful message.
Thank you for the information. I didn't notice.
You're welcome, Justice!! 😊👍
Justice, I found the scene: it's in episode 2, at 20:09 minutes
2 different person I think
Hi, do you have the full video of JPM’s version? I can’t find it anywhere on youtube. Such a beautiful version
ua-cam.com/video/6VcfBh3hWO4/v-deo.htmlsi=Z2HkbFv7i3C8BjEq
@@justiceforjamespaulmccartney thank you so much, I love Paul’s voice, there’s clearly a difference between him and Billy. Paul have always been my favorite beatles but I never liked his solo stuff or with wings and now I know why
It is obvious, he is using also very different vowels to sing some of the phrases and even the pronunciation of some words is strongly different. Listen carefully to the word "better" and example.
OH MY WORD, WHAT WILL WE DO ???
Paul has a clean crisp voice and is on pitch.
It's obvious.its not the same person.
The rhythm of their vouces are different. Paul has the bette7r vouce, Faul only sounds pk when sung with other vouces or another vouce complimenting it. Paul can sing on his own, Faul needs accompaniment. His breathing cant hold the melody.
Totally different voices without question!!! Paul's wonderful angelic voice in contrast to Billy's heavy voice!!! Just one indication that we are dealing with 2 different people!!! 🌞🌻💛🙏🙂
Oh, no comparison. First voice is from the diaphragm and feet, second voice is from the throat.
This!
It's so far from the original, how can we believe if there's someone pretending a lot, the truth will prevail
The last 3 notes, Paul is ascending and Faul is descending.
Thanks. I didn' notice.
@@justiceforjamespaulmccartney The Beatles song book is packed away but I think the way it is written there is like the Faul way. Is the original recording of it on Revolver 66'? Because it was released in both the US and England. I don't think it is copyrighted the way you have your original if I remember correctly.
"Here, There And Everywhere (Take 6)" - The Beatles (Revolver). ua-cam.com/video/C1Z9ajhOLpM/v-deo.html
@@justiceforjamespaulmccartney Thanks now I know the original is still on Revolver. Hate to see a law suit over 3 notes.
Yes, Billy’s was so cringe, but especially that ending.
I like this. Please share more of these Paul Vs Faul voice comparisons.
I will.
Paul can do it without trying
How old was Billy . Old was Paul in this comparison? Just curious
Paul 24 years 1966. Billy 54 years 1991.
Very sure Billy share knows that he's not the real Paul McCartney and the rest of the knew that too and the only one that still knows that truth and he will take it to his grave like a true beetle Long Live James Paul McCartney the real beetle God bless
There are more questions than answers. 1 what happened to the car he died in and the emergency services that were involved? 2 what about Paul’s real family, wouldn’t they know about his death? 3 Why not just do a DNA on faul to end the speculation?
1. I did not find any information about what happened to the car after the accident. Paul was seriously injured in the accident, so the police and rescuers did not know who he was. The few reporters who realized it was Paul were threatened not to publish anything in the newspapers.
2. Being a matter of national security, Paul's family was forced to keep everything secret.
3. Billy will never do a DNA test with Mike McCartney because he will not be allowed to do such a thing. By the way, Billy did a DNA test with Paul's daughter from Germany and it came out negative.
@@justiceforjamespaulmccartney When Paul's brother was asked about the rumours about Paul being dead the host asked him when was the last time he saw Paul. He answered At his Funeral, the audience laughed thinking it was a joke, he did not laugh but then said I saw him before being here.. Well thats not a lie.. Read the words carefully. The truth comes out in their speech. Before here could have been any number of months or years ago... To me he answered there and then,, I sadly believe that even if it was admitted and proved beyond reasonable doubt that the ones that deny he was replaced will just then say,, well he is better than the real one anyway so thats ok,,
Great Video. Is there a photo anywhere of Billy shears before he had surgery to look like Paul ?
Yes. ua-cam.com/video/6hijQl3OJB4/v-deo.html
Why don't they just do a "voice print" analysis! Everybody's voice has a unique pattern just like their fingerprints and settle the conspiracy theory once and for all!!
I think it is very clear that Paul and Billy have two very different voices. It is obvious.
John Lennon and George Harrison took the secret to their grave . 🪦🪦🍏
Or did they? Who was behind Lennon's assassination? Lots of clues were left in their songs about Paul's passing. Both John and George would mention key things in interviews over the years.
Wow ! what a complete difference. to bad people can't notice it. Faul came to Green Bay wi. last year, and I could not convince any one that it was not the original Paul.
Such a stark contrast!! Sadly so many people are not only blind, but deaf to the truth.
Thank you for your comment. Yes, you don't need special devices, you don't even need a musical ear, it's quite obvious.
And in the end...
The noise we make, is equal to nothing in the face of the fact that whether it is Paul or Billy Pepper, the music was spectacular for decades.
Prior to 1966, Paul fathered a couple of kids while the Beatles toured around Europe and Hamberg that most don't know about. The label paid for their support in exchange for them keeping quiet. After 1966, the deal changed. If any of his out of wedlock children demanded a modern DNA or even a blood test to establish paternity, they'd be cut out of any will or inheritance. They're still alive today and have kept their mouths shut.
Today, what does it really matter. Most screaming fans of the Beatles back then are either deceased or in retirement homes today.
For myself, the issue is settled.
When Paul sat solo on the Ed Sullivan Show and performed "Yesterday", he had brown eyes.k It was clear cuz of the close ups. And he played the song in the key of G... Take my word for it, I've been a musician for over 50 yrs and have studied that film footage just to learn the original arrangement. A year later, "Paul" had hazel eyes and a much narrower face and tuned his guitar in what's known as a "drop D tuning" cuz he couldn't hit the original high notes of the vocals.
Our voices do not change that much over a year or two to require that much of a key change.
Also, "Paul" seemed to grow about three or four inches taller between 66 & 67. In early photos, he was about the same height as Lennon and his then time girlfriend.
On Sgt. Peppers pics, he's much taller than the rest of the group.
At this point, what does it really matter?
The world won't know the truth unless Ringo chooses to make a death bed confession.
Ringo has already made a confession about William (Billy Shears) Campbell taking Paul McCartney's place. I found it on Duck Duck Go. Billy told the media that Ringo was going senile and he wanted the attention!
It matters because they lie about Everything. Truth always matters.
@@annettekenning8326 Great 😁. What's the video called?
@ jonbel1163...SÍ IMPORTA TSL VEZ A TI TE DE IGUAL PERO NO PARA EL RESTO QUE LE HAN VENDIDO UNA MENTIRA...TAL VEZ A TI TE GUSTA QUE TE MIENTAN O ESTÁS SCOSTUMBRADO A MENTIR 😂😂😂, PARA MUCHOS SÍ LO ES, ES VÁLIDO SABER QUÉ OCURRIÓ CON PAUL. ASI QUÉ NO DA LO MISMO...
Billy shepherd
This might explain why this guy now has lost his voice as it's fracturing. It's coz he's 87 if we can believe it isn't bio Paul. Paul's voice had more depth & fluency but the other is thin & all over the place. If Paul didn't really die in 1966 then why did they say he did that way coz no one should joke about death especially from a car accident & there was certainly a cover up. The moment of truth will soon approach.
I hope that PIA-ers will not say again that it is taken out of context 😊
The actual Paul is an impostor
So, who did Heather Mills divorce….
Billy. Paul died in 1966.
On "Gratitude" played backwards Paul allegedly says "I was Willie Campbell" in a ghostly voice. Just saying, you decide.
I heard. From my research his name is William Shepherd. But Shears or Campbell is also possible.
@@justiceforjamespaulmccartney
I also heard that, and that the name "Shears" came from John making a joke about the name Shepherd but it's all in the past with no evidence to back it up.
The First album ('63 or '64) I ever bought was WHAT I THOUGHT was a Beatle album but instead turned out to be an album of covers by a band called "The BEATS". I think the band was actually Billy and the Pepperpots with William "Billy Shears" Shepherd playing the part of "Billy Pepper" in what was a rip-off to make money on anything British in America. It obviously worked on me although I knew the difference right away when I played the cover to "She Loves You." I still have the album.
You have to admit Faul would be great as part of a tribute act.
Paul is sonorous.
Seems like different keys.
It’s not different keys. Notice how they’re singing the same notes. It’s just that Billy is not as not as good a singer as Paul was. Not even close.
also his right eye is glass. now we'll know what to look for next time he presents himself as Paul. all good things come to an end billy.
It drives me crazy trying to tell so called super fans but they can't see it hear it they didn't even look alike especially at first they tried but failed bills 4 inches taller different finger prints he's right handed he's been caught loads there's loads more just give ya heads a shake and go to specsavers 😁
I hear ya, loud and clear! I tried to point it out to "so called" dyed in the wool fans, and they were aggressive and told me I was a moron. They bragged about being long-time Beatles fans since the 60s and they should know. I'm also a long time fan (was 10 yrs old when they came to Melbourne), however, I have investigated and compared the early "Paul" and the later "Faul" and without a doubt in my mind I can honestly say that Faul is not Paul James McCartney.
Should've been recorded in a lower key
You know when you get like a cabaret club singer, and they're good, but they have this sort of style about their vocal style, sort of campy and exaggerated and choppy, that seems to manifest in those circuit of singers in particular? There's probably an actual word for it. But anyway, that's faul's style. I like some of his Wings stuff though.
Could be the microphones, but seriously only Faul would write Silly Love Songs.
I’m with you on that!
How do we know Billy Shepherd was born in 1937?
Researching. Internet, books.
Something I noticed looking at photos of Paul. He ALWAYS wore a watch, on his right wrist - to be expected since he was a lefty.
Faul most often doesn't wear a watch. When he does, it's bounced between both left and, to a lesser degree, on his right wrist. And when he reaches for things, he often leads with his right hand. This is perfectly normal for a right-handed person.
I'm glad I thought to look for his watch!
As for "fooling Linda," she never met Paul, so it would've been easy for her to believe Faul was Paul.
Someday the truth will come out - again.
Linda always knew who Billy was.
@@justiceforjamespaulmccartney
Linda Eastman never met the real Paul McCartney, then. First time meeting "him" was May 15, 1967. Isn't that 6 months and 9 days after Paul McCartney died on Nov 06, 1966? That's some of the fastest healing time.
Then, one year later, May 1967, they met in New York. (Hm... It could be a chance meeting, but nearly exactly 1 year later they meet-up in the USA? Suspicious.)
When she was 4 months pregnant with their first (her second) daughter, they married March 12, 1969.
We do know that Lennon, Harrison, and Ringo all said McCartney was much like a controlling dictator (with Lennon a very close second).
It's known and documented that McCartney is/was abusively controlling (possibly, physically abusive) of all his girlfriends and wives - with the exception of his current wife. This wouldn't be surprising since it's well-known that Lennon was also abusive (physically) towards women - including his first wife. Yoko didn't put up with that shit, and all other Beatles did say Lennon needed a strong woman - and Yoko fit the bill.
Hm... Lennon stated Paul was dead ... After Lennon died, Harrison did state that Lennon and Paul and were both dead, too.
Lennon was stating the truth about the world powers, and I know the US Government killed him. They feared his influence and following would have led to a real Revolution.
Harrison made on multiple occasions, impactful, direct, barbed comments about the big change that happened in 1966, and that was when he became disillusioned with "The Beatles."
I do believe that our souls live on - some choosing to reincarnate, some not.
Do you think that since Paul died a horrific death, his spirit was called into Billy Shears body?
After all, Aleister Crowley is pictured on the SPLHCB album cover (of course with other deceased, as well as (then) alive, people).
"Giles Martin, the man behind this project explained the cover art, co-created by pop artist Peter Blake, is iconic. It depicts The Beatles surrounded by the images of famous figures from history and pop culture -- 'almost like ... AN IRISH WAKE,' (Colin) Fleming said."
- www.npr.org May 28, 2017
"Sgt. Pepper marks the beginning of McCartney's ASCENDANCY as the Beatles' DOMINANT creative FORCE. ... ASSERTING INCREASING CONTROL ..."
- en.m.wikipedia.org
Lennon stated that if people only knew that the world leaders are all terrible people; part of a very sick club; who does things and uses the people to achieve their goals of more money, more power, more control - like a sick game.
Sorry for the rambling. I never knew about this, and I'm glad you are vested in opening people's eyes and mind. Thank you.
On the david letterman show, David mentions to (Billy) the conspiracy that “you died and another guy replaced you.”
To that, (Billy) said frankly, “I’m the guy!” But David inferred it to mean (the Paul).
When Paul died, news hit the US and people mourned.
The guy in charge of burying Paul is credible, said he buried Paul’s body, that it was Paul.
Burying Paul would have been something anyone would remember and not take any pleasure in.
Epstein and others could not/would not let the Beatles enterprise die with Paul. I think we’re glad they didn’t let it just fizzle.
I’m sure the world was ecstatic to hear that the reports of his death were “a hoax,” that the Beatles would be touring again soon - it’s the power of denial, the preference for the artificial reality they wanted to be true. The “hoax” (Paul’s death) was quickly forgotten. The human mind is incredible.
Once Billy was writing his own material, things were easier for him. He’s done a magnificent job standing in, having had to fill Paul’s shoes and learn to play left-handed while singing.
I don’t see it so much as a fraud, but as a “the show must go on” success story.
Ringing is said to have admitted the facts. I think it would have been a difficult secret to keep, and the feeling of disrespect for Paul or carrying in without him, which might be softened with the symbols and images used to express the truth - to pay homage to Paul and to ease the pains associated with their loss and the burden of having deceived the world.
D
Where abouts does a tell you about the guy who buried Paul ?
faul
🤔🤔🤔 NO SON IGUALES !!! SOY MÚSICO, Y CUANDO UNO CREA ALGO SUYO LE PONE SU SELLO PERSONAL, EMOCIONAL, ENTONACIÓN,TIMBRE Y LO MÁS IMPORTANTE SENTIMIENTO ...LO CUAL A " FAUL" NO LO TIENE 😂😂😂POR QUÉ NO ES SU BEBÉ ...INCLUSO LE CUESTA CANTARLA, Y DESAFINA. AL ORIGINAL AL VERDADERO PAUL LO CANTABA CON PASIÓN Y YA NO ESTÁ CON NOSOTROS EN ESTE CRUEL MUNDO 🥺🥺😯😭😭