Hey Stealth, so far my impression of the game is one of skepticism even with all the footage out-- what is your general overview of how the updates have shaped up? Are they trending in a positive direction? Also, I really feel like the Soviets have all the non-conventional and interesting platforms and weapons-- what's your view on how differently and how interesting the NATO lineup is to use?
VERY interesting mission concept! I generally find missions like this compelling, where a factor of cost-effectiveness and strategy prohibits the wanton deployment of weapons.
This is an interesting scenario, and I'm impressed to see Stealth improving his playstyle so rapidly, especially after his video on mistakes. That's some real Main Character development. I'm ever so slightly disappointed that helos were deployed, as it is practically impossible to conduct flight deck operations in Sea State 9, but I'll let Stealth off if he launches a helo without an ASW loadout to pick up the pilot of Nightmare 3-1. ;)
I love the fact that the harrier bagged one enemy plane using its autocannons, and also the fact that the game has midair collisions! (thankfully I don't need that for my Intercept as each square is 10 000 km, intentional ramming is still there of course).
Stealth, love the Sea Power content. But, IIRC, its pronounced "Tar-a-wah." 5:36: Couldn't the Harrier carry the AGM-122 Sidearm? 11:37: Yes. IRL, the AV-8A does not have radar. It was envisioned as a ground attack platform, not a fighter. And at the time, air to ground radar, at least those precise enough for CAS, had not been developed.
In your 7 mistakes video, for detection you were talking about the issue with active radar/sonar giving away your position - and I was thinking sonobuoys are not just for submarines. While ships are not good at passive listening (because they make so much noise), put a passive listener away from everyone and you can light up surface contacts too. Watching some of the early UA-cam videos has demonstrated this effect. So that Harpoon loaded P-3, should consider emptying its sonobuoy supply to give more data on what's out there!
@@adamtruong1759in game it currently does not, if you look at 4:31, he has just launched the P-3 and there are no sonobuoys in its armament, only chaff and harpoons.
@@Nobody10115 I see. Doesn't make too much sense as the same P3 can carry 8 torpedoes in a bomb bay w/ it's sonobuoys. Unless the chaff dispenser replaces it, then I can understand.
@@adamtruong1759 I think it has chaff on the ASW loadout too. I guess it’s just a limitation of the loadouts. It does kinda make sense that it doesn’t bring sonobuoys as it isn’t in its mission, it’s there to drop those harpoons.
Kirov would absolutely not laugh at 8 harpoons... Remember that the Moskva, a Slava class cruiser, was sunk by just 2 neptune missiles, neptune being largely equivalent to a modern harpoon. The Slava class is equipped with 64 S300 sea-air missiles, 6 30mm ciws guns etc. Sea skimming anti-ship missiles of this type are deadly, they are very hard to detect (without an airborne radar, from less than 20 miles, often less) and very hard to shoot. Remember that the 5 exocet fired by Argentina sunk 2 ships in the Falklands war... Unless the defending ships have a warning regarding incoming missiles, reaction time is extremely short and Russian missiles in the game are strongly buffed; Early versions of s300 were not really able to intercept such small and very low flying targets. At the time the best defense was probably the shafts, but the Kirov being a huge target... Intercepting backfires with Harriers with guns only, that was a funny fantasy too. The major threat in that scenario will probably come from Russian subs, if they have time to be in your path, with the rough sea, detecting them will be very hard. Russian should also have a recon Tu95 flying in the distance if this is a war situation, and it could direct Russian ships and bombers towards you if you break silence, or detect you with their radar but then you would have a chance to intercept. Good luck with part 2 !
Very interesting that they've modeled all sorts of problems the weather can throw even at a modern navy. Though, pretty sure that many ships are only rated to be able to operate Helicopters at sea states 5 and below (and those are fairly large ships w/ helipads amidships, factors that make such operations "easier").
@@Stealth17Gaming Ah I see, then that should be a feature the devs should add to the game. It makes things more interesting when you can't use some of your assets at your disposal, and are forced to adapt.
I would use 1 P-3 with surface search. She could detect the fleet out of range of their sam's. Then use the other P-3 to drop sonar bouys working at longer range from the fleet.
I feel like this game would improve greatly from dynamic sea states. It's calm for a few hours but gradually gets worse as storms come and go and vise versa.
Pretty cool that you can control a small support carrier like the Tarawa by the way I have heard it pronounced like Tar-a-wa for years but if that’s how you pronounce it that’s fine.
@@Stealth17GamingYom Kippur war, naval action off the coast of Egypt. Kiev escorting Soviet convoy carrying war materials for the Egyptian Army. Israel technically only possess old S and T class, ww2 vintage, it only until 76 did they commission Gal class, which was a modified sub class of type 206. It is a bit apocryphal but Gal class model already exist in game. You could also add in Israel Missile boat for the scenario where they have to sink the convoy or if needed be, Kiev and her escorts.
You know, if you launched F-4’s and there are enemy seaborne targets, you should have launched 4 F-4’s, two outfitted with HARM’s to deal with the shipboard radar. Blind their ships and they are sitting ducks! The F-4’s could each haul 4 HARM’s and that would have reduced the effectively of the Soviet fleets. So Wild Weasels and a strike package, you win.
Squadron CO: Why do all of our P-3s have 2000lbs of nitrous oxide tanks onboard for every flight? Mechanic: I don't know, sir. (Hides NOX label from tank)
Obviously this takeoff wasn’t realistic but Electra’s, the plane the P-3 is based on, were very overpowered and lightly loaded can take-off quite quickly.
Can someone write the differences between planes? Like when do I want an F14, F15, F16? Which is the fastest, stealthiest? Best for bombing, air-to-air combat, etc.? Thanks.
@@Stealth17Gaming One solutiuon: Wait with your SEAD assets in shooting position, until you have Harpoons on the way. Then the enemy can choose if he will eat the Harpoons or switch his radar on, engage the SSM and gets a visit from Shrikes.
You deserve a bit of praise I didnt like your first set of videos on sea power. But these are way better to watch and I hope the community comments dont drive you away from future sea power content.
Why do you use weapons free mode on the planes? Can’t you tell them manually to attack and select the target? Wouldn’t that stop the issue of them all shooting at the same target?
I sincerely hope they either add British and Argentinian forces from the era, or that the modders don't let me down. Because I so desperately want to make a scenario for the battle of the Falklands. Maybe some AU - what if the Belgrano hadn't been sank, or the attack was launched before Thatcher gave the go-ahead to sink the ship? Because this game looks perfect for that kind of scenario.
I'm a fan and I've been looking forward to this. But if they don't do it, c'mon. The only actual modern naval battle in the time period of the game they're building? Get on it. You need to do the Sheffield, the Belgrano, the 25th May, the battle of San Carlos, sinking of Coventry, I mean what are they waiting for?
Royal Navy is planned by the devs but it will be post release, they're not adding it now because it would be a lot of work that would probably delay the game.
@@samsungsmartfridge3173 that makes sense. My main thought was just - in the era they're depicting, it is one of the most famous force-on-force naval events there was (along with Praying Mantis and the fighting between Indian and Pakistan). But I'd rather have a finished and well put together game sooner than have it delayed just to get British Sea Harriers and French-made Argentinean fighters.
4:00 Lol, what? I can't tell if you're joking. It's a loadout for when you just need to ferry them to another base. I.e. minimum armament and max range loadout.
Harriers in combat scenario wouldn't really take off vertically, they would perform a STOL. Vertical take off limits possible payload size and range a lot so it's not really performed outside of training
F-4E? Shouldn't they have the F-4S by that date? I guess not, but the S variant had new engines that didn't leave a thick black smoke behind the aircraft. lol
The F-4E was the main Air Force variant with the upgraded engines. The F-4S was the upgraded Navy variant. So seeing Phantom E's taking off from a land base is accurate for the time period, although I doubt they'd be taxiing to the runway with their wings folded and canopies up lol
@@scullystie4389 the USMC was still using F-4Ss from land bases all the way into the early '90s, so F-4S wouldn't be too out of place here. Not impossible at least
Personal gripe: how come nobody knows a thing or two about harriers? 😅 Everyone thinks all Harrier's have a radar seemingly because all they ever seem to know about them is the AV-8B PLUS Harrier II exists, forget the existence of the Sea Harriers; everyone seems to think every single harrier has a radar simply due to that one variant ... 4 of them... out of 35... Just in production aircraft alone and counting differently equipped sub-variants such as the Harrier Gr.1 and the Gr.1A, or the harrier Gr.7 and Gr.7A as well as the export versions of aircraft under each respective nation, such as the FRS.1 and FRS.51, or the AV-8A and AV-8S, and not counting prototypes... ...that's a lot of misconception
There are different versions of the Harrier. The first versions like the AV8-A in this secenario and the Harriers of the Royal Air Force are light ground attack aircraft. Of course they can use Sidewinders and guns, but they lack a radar and depend on the eyes of the pilot. The British Sea Harrier is a multirole aircraft, specially designed for the Roly Navy. It has radar with air-to-air capability and can work as an all weather fighter or as a ground attack (also anti-ship) aircraft. It was very successfull against the argentinian jets in the Falklands war.
Yes, I have now learned it TAR-ah-wah.
'Tear'-uh-wah, attaboi. Love the Sea Power content!
I have heard it refered to as Tar oh-wuh
But I ain’t an expert
Hey Stealth, so far my impression of the game is one of skepticism even with all the footage out-- what is your general overview of how the updates have shaped up? Are they trending in a positive direction? Also, I really feel like the Soviets have all the non-conventional and interesting platforms and weapons-- what's your view on how differently and how interesting the NATO lineup is to use?
Hawk-tar-oh-wah
Oh thank god. 😂😂
Harriers don't get radar until Sea Harrier (UK) or AV-8B Harrier II+ (USMC, Spanish Armada, Italian Navy)
Mid air collision being modelled is so amazing, the developers have really worked hard.
collisions would be an underlying feature of the game engine and could be modelled for any in game object, nothing special.
@@M3talr3x But it's great, that it is available! 👍
@@SiegfriedH58 some people just can't appreciate someone's hardwork.
Just wondering why the Harrier pilot didn't pull up and to the right instead of diving into the Tupolev he just had gunned down? 😊
However, it seemed to me that harrier pilot had a really dumb AI.
I like that 'Eyes (Visual Sensor)' is listed in the sensor list of the Harriers, gotta love the Mk 1 Eyeball
Nightmare 3 is an absolute baller! If he survived he is guna be drinking off that story for the rest of his life!
Callsign: Tailgater
Bro wanted a chat with Ivan on the way down. 💀 💀 💀
Imagine being that Harrier pilot ^^
Command - Turn on your radars
Pilot - ...sir... do you know what aircraft you assigned to this mission?
I love how crazy the sea state can become. Watching the USS Yorktown go through those waves at 2:18 is awesome. Much better than Cold Waters!
I never watch "lets play" videos, but I'm hooked on these Sea Power ones. Somehow such a "dry" game is more intense.
Tarawa's CApt be like
C:"Where's Joe?"
FC:"The Bomber Shot him down too"
C:"The What!?"🤨
Why not? As far as i know, the Backfire has Guns in it's stern.
VERY interesting mission concept! I generally find missions like this compelling, where a factor of cost-effectiveness and strategy prohibits the wanton deployment of weapons.
24:55 "Ay yo watch yo jet bruh. WATCH YO JET!"
This is an interesting scenario, and I'm impressed to see Stealth improving his playstyle so rapidly, especially after his video on mistakes. That's some real Main Character development.
I'm ever so slightly disappointed that helos were deployed, as it is practically impossible to conduct flight deck operations in Sea State 9, but I'll let Stealth off if he launches a helo without an ASW loadout to pick up the pilot of Nightmare 3-1. ;)
I love the fact that the harrier bagged one enemy plane using its autocannons, and also the fact that the game has midair collisions! (thankfully I don't need that for my Intercept as each square is 10 000 km, intentional ramming is still there of course).
at this point i wish they would have included the RN with sea harriers (aim 9Ls, anti ship missiles, bombs, rockets and cluster bombs)
They'll probably be coming later on, given how there are RN assets in game already
It'll probably come as a sort of update/DLC, if not a mod by the community.
@@AirShark95 definitely being worked on by the modding community 😇
I know this is a small thing, but watching the drop tanks disappearing into the clouds is a level of detail that just delights me.
Stealth, love the Sea Power content. But, IIRC, its pronounced "Tar-a-wah."
5:36: Couldn't the Harrier carry the AGM-122 Sidearm?
11:37: Yes. IRL, the AV-8A does not have radar. It was envisioned as a ground attack platform, not a fighter. And at the time, air to ground radar, at least those precise enough for CAS, had not been developed.
As far as im aware, the AV-8A cannot carry the AGM-122, only the AV-8B and later variants could.
That is Moskenesöya.
You could include Lavangen as a air base farther into Narvikenfjord.
In your 7 mistakes video, for detection you were talking about the issue with active radar/sonar giving away your position - and I was thinking sonobuoys are not just for submarines. While ships are not good at passive listening (because they make so much noise), put a passive listener away from everyone and you can light up surface contacts too. Watching some of the early UA-cam videos has demonstrated this effect. So that Harpoon loaded P-3, should consider emptying its sonobuoy supply to give more data on what's out there!
I believe the harpoon loadout removes the sonobuoys
@@Nobody10115 Pretty sure the P3s can carry sonar buoys w/ 4 harpoons on the wing tips.
@@adamtruong1759in game it currently does not, if you look at 4:31, he has just launched the P-3 and there are no sonobuoys in its armament, only chaff and harpoons.
@@Nobody10115 I see. Doesn't make too much sense as the same P3 can carry 8 torpedoes in a bomb bay w/ it's sonobuoys. Unless the chaff dispenser replaces it, then I can understand.
@@adamtruong1759 I think it has chaff on the ASW loadout too. I guess it’s just a limitation of the loadouts. It does kinda make sense that it doesn’t bring sonobuoys as it isn’t in its mission, it’s there to drop those harpoons.
TAR-a-wa. Accent is on the first syllable.
Ok my bad.
@@Stealth17Gaming The US tends to name it's ships after battles it has fought around the world and that means pronunciation is sometimes a struggle.
@@Stealth17Gaming No worries. I've heard it pronounced a lot worse.
I love that aircraft still respond to heading orders with “helm, aye”
Yeah funny little oversight. I know they're working on the voice lines.
@@Stealth17Gaming we updated voiceovers yesterday, in fact that's a total overhaul with completely new voices and logic, should be much better now
@MekStark1980 I'm still on #68. Are they going to be in the next version?
@@Stealth17Gaming I will ask Martin to include them as fast as possible in stable
Kirov would absolutely not laugh at 8 harpoons... Remember that the Moskva, a Slava class cruiser, was sunk by just 2 neptune missiles, neptune being largely equivalent to a modern harpoon. The Slava class is equipped with 64 S300 sea-air missiles, 6 30mm ciws guns etc. Sea skimming anti-ship missiles of this type are deadly, they are very hard to detect (without an airborne radar, from less than 20 miles, often less) and very hard to shoot. Remember that the 5 exocet fired by Argentina sunk 2 ships in the Falklands war... Unless the defending ships have a warning regarding incoming missiles, reaction time is extremely short and Russian missiles in the game are strongly buffed; Early versions of s300 were not really able to intercept such small and very low flying targets. At the time the best defense was probably the shafts, but the Kirov being a huge target... Intercepting backfires with Harriers with guns only, that was a funny fantasy too. The major threat in that scenario will probably come from Russian subs, if they have time to be in your path, with the rough sea, detecting them will be very hard. Russian should also have a recon Tu95 flying in the distance if this is a war situation, and it could direct Russian ships and bombers towards you if you break silence, or detect you with their radar but then you would have a chance to intercept. Good luck with part 2 !
Ta raw wah😂 I love it! Not throwing shade, all it means is you read!
Very interesting that they've modeled all sorts of problems the weather can throw even at a modern navy. Though, pretty sure that many ships are only rated to be able to operate Helicopters at sea states 5 and below (and those are fairly large ships w/ helipads amidships, factors that make such operations "easier").
It was a restriction I placed upon myself. Dropping off a team with helicopter would have been too easy
@@Stealth17Gaming Ah I see, then that should be a feature the devs should add to the game. It makes things more interesting when you can't use some of your assets at your disposal, and are forced to adapt.
@@adamtruong1759 Certainly
dude teh mid air! i thought it would pass right through. fantastic. this game has a ton of potential
I love the reworked voice lines. Sounds more...radioy, idk how to describe it😂
Love the vids
Wow, that STOL Orion, amazing!!! :)
Pilots hate tailstrikes. 😂
@@SiegfriedH58 Fortunately, the MAD protected the fuselage! :)
This is a very interesting scenario, excited for the next bit!
i slept very well in shiraz on october 26th but I think it was the closest simulation that happened that night
I would use 1 P-3 with surface search. She could detect the fleet out of range of their sam's. Then use the other P-3 to drop sonar bouys working at longer range from the fleet.
Damn that mid air collision; love all the detail in this game
Love to see harriers in action!
I feel like this game would improve greatly from dynamic sea states. It's calm for a few hours but gradually gets worse as storms come and go and vise versa.
Love the Harrier content
4:50 LMAO WHAT WAS THAT TAKEOFF
Seeing the ships in those seasssss 🤤
Harriers intercepting and gunning down Backfires is insane. Talk about perfect timing and positioning of your aircraft
Pretty cool that you can control a small support carrier like the Tarawa by the way I have heard it pronounced like Tar-a-wa for years but if that’s how you pronounce it that’s fine.
Is there a possibility to see a Kiev class in action? In a scenario?
Sure. I'll plan something for next week. Have a scenario in mind?
@@Stealth17Gaming Be careful with russian carriers, they tend to run over allied ships. Ask BrotherMunro how I know lol
@@Stealth17GamingYom Kippur war, naval action off the coast of Egypt. Kiev escorting Soviet convoy carrying war materials for the Egyptian Army. Israel technically only possess old S and T class, ww2 vintage, it only until 76 did they commission Gal class, which was a modified sub class of type 206. It is a bit apocryphal but Gal class model already exist in game. You could also add in Israel Missile boat for the scenario where they have to sink the convoy or if needed be, Kiev and her escorts.
@@Stealth17Gaming no i just have a general request
It would be nice to see crew members.
Have they concentrated some work on the weather condition great work if they did can't wait to get my hands on this 😊
I would recommend not to take shrikes for anti-ship or in general, because they have a very small warhead and they tend to not track at all.
Do they have Ground effect vehicles in the game? The Caspian Sea monster armed with 6 Stix AShM would be really cool to have in a scenario
Ticos should have Tomahawks and SM1 during that era that has secondary mode which as Antiship missile.
Oh wow, i am not supposed to OWN the radar station, i think the workshop scenario might be broken than :D i was wondering why it was so easy
Brilliant!
You know, if you launched F-4’s and there are enemy seaborne targets, you should have launched 4 F-4’s, two outfitted with HARM’s to deal with the shipboard radar. Blind their ships and they are sitting ducks! The F-4’s could each haul 4 HARM’s and that would have reduced the effectively of the Soviet fleets. So Wild Weasels and a strike package, you win.
Hopefully they add the AV8b as they entered service only 2 years after the Ticonderoga class so well within the time frame of the game
Yes, the US did not even field the AV8a, so I don't know why this US is anachronistically in the game.
Love seeing the different sea states but that begs a question, are the sea states static or dynamic?
interesting, the av-8a in this game carries AIM-9Ls. dont think they did that IRL, only the AIM-9G they could carry
🗣HARRIER MENTIONED‼️
Seriously hyped for this game. Have played cold waters to death and Command Modern Operations is just too tism for me.
Cool looking Carrier
It's a amphibious assault ship.
Or a Destroyer if you are Japanese...
Are there refueling planes? Because the harrier can't really do any STO without refueling right after taking off.
Tar-ah-Wah!
Remember for missions after 1979 the RA5 wouldn’t be realistic to use at it was retired in 1979
it would be cool if you had to go and rescue your down guys by either heli or ships.
4:41 hmmm geee I didn't realise the P-3 could accelerate that fast 😂
Squadron CO: Why do all of our P-3s have 2000lbs of nitrous oxide tanks onboard for every flight?
Mechanic: I don't know, sir. (Hides NOX label from tank)
Obviously this takeoff wasn’t realistic but Electra’s, the plane the P-3 is based on, were very overpowered and lightly loaded can take-off quite quickly.
I assume you have to worry about fuel state of your aircraft? Cause IIRC, Harriers have very short legs.
Tar ah wa... I didn't even recognize LHA-1 s name how badly you massacred the pronunciation otherwise AWESOME Video... please keep em coming
Oh god your mic, I was so excited to watch this but I can’t, my ears are dying.
My mic was no different than in any of my other videos
@ I’d never seen any of your videos before, I’m just excited for the game to come out.😅
Mic is fine idk what this guy is smoking..? @Stealth17Gaming
@@chadvader974 just a strange spikiness to the rear of lines.
Tarawa: Tear-a-WAH
Can someone write the differences between planes? Like when do I want an F14, F15, F16? Which is the fastest, stealthiest? Best for bombing, air-to-air combat, etc.? Thanks.
NATO really sent the B team that day great vid
ea6 sead anti ship too!
If their radars are active, yes.
@@Stealth17Gaming One solutiuon: Wait with your SEAD assets in shooting position, until you have Harpoons on the way. Then the enemy can choose if he will eat the Harpoons or switch his radar on, engage the SSM and gets a visit from Shrikes.
You deserve a bit of praise I didnt like your first set of videos on sea power. But these are way better to watch and I hope the community comments dont drive you away from future sea power content.
Hi can you do a video showing ground forces? If you can control them, and a small battle? (tank vs tank)
I can but it's not great
@@Stealth17Gaming really? Its the only thing about the game I still havent seen much. 🤔
...and just a bit too close for that gun kill. @24:45 :)
the whole game is just usa vs ussr or there are enough allied and warsaw pact assets to make a scenario?
More warships will be added in the future
Why do you use weapons free mode on the planes? Can’t you tell them manually to attack and select the target? Wouldn’t that stop the issue of them all shooting at the same target?
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. I haven't worked out what logic the planes use.
@@Stealth17Gaming interesting. With how good this game looks, sometimes have to remind myself it’s not even in early access yet
I sincerely hope they either add British and Argentinian forces from the era, or that the modders don't let me down. Because I so desperately want to make a scenario for the battle of the Falklands. Maybe some AU - what if the Belgrano hadn't been sank, or the attack was launched before Thatcher gave the go-ahead to sink the ship? Because this game looks perfect for that kind of scenario.
I'm a fan and I've been looking forward to this. But if they don't do it, c'mon. The only actual modern naval battle in the time period of the game they're building? Get on it. You need to do the Sheffield, the Belgrano, the 25th May, the battle of San Carlos, sinking of Coventry, I mean what are they waiting for?
Royal Navy is planned by the devs but it will be post release, they're not adding it now because it would be a lot of work that would probably delay the game.
@@samsungsmartfridge3173 that makes sense. My main thought was just - in the era they're depicting, it is one of the most famous force-on-force naval events there was (along with Praying Mantis and the fighting between Indian and Pakistan). But I'd rather have a finished and well put together game sooner than have it delayed just to get British Sea Harriers and French-made Argentinean fighters.
Shortes p3 take off in history
4:00 Lol, what? I can't tell if you're joking. It's a loadout for when you just need to ferry them to another base. I.e. minimum armament and max range loadout.
no vtol in the game ? for the harriers
Not modelled maybe
They can’t take off vertical with a combat load. Any “VTOL” fighter is really a STOVL fighter
Harriers in combat scenario wouldn't really take off vertically, they would perform a STOL. Vertical take off limits possible payload size and range a lot so it's not really performed outside of training
F-4E? Shouldn't they have the F-4S by that date? I guess not, but the S variant had new engines that didn't leave a thick black smoke behind the aircraft. lol
A friend has a radio controlled F4-E model. And we all are missing the black smoke when he is flying. 😊
The F-4E was the main Air Force variant with the upgraded engines. The F-4S was the upgraded Navy variant. So seeing Phantom E's taking off from a land base is accurate for the time period, although I doubt they'd be taxiing to the runway with their wings folded and canopies up lol
@@scullystie4389 the USMC was still using F-4Ss from land bases all the way into the early '90s, so F-4S wouldn't be too out of place here. Not impossible at least
@@scullystie4389 Thanks for pointing out that oversight! I'll remove the wing fold from the AF F-4s
Old Harriers do not have radar
Tar-a-wa
Can you make a scenario based on the scene from the Movie Hunter Killer? Please, i wanna see submarine actions more!!!
I have another submarine scenario coming on Wednesday
Personal gripe: how come nobody knows a thing or two about harriers? 😅 Everyone thinks all Harrier's have a radar seemingly because all they ever seem to know about them is the AV-8B PLUS Harrier II exists, forget the existence of the Sea Harriers; everyone seems to think every single harrier has a radar simply due to that one variant ...
4 of them...
out of 35...
Just in production aircraft alone and counting differently equipped sub-variants such as the Harrier Gr.1 and the Gr.1A, or the harrier Gr.7 and Gr.7A as well as the export versions of aircraft under each respective nation, such as the FRS.1 and FRS.51, or the AV-8A and AV-8S, and not counting prototypes... ...that's a lot of misconception
Are we going to get some ultimate admiral content now there’s been an update 👀
No sorry
That's pronounced TARawa. (Pacific island).
Play the Kiev
No british ships then....
can't belive youre withholding alfa class gameplay from us
Wasn't aware I was doing that
turuhwuh lol...
Us Yanks pronounce it TAR•a•wa
Harrier is a ground attacker, not a fighter
Tell that to the Argentinians.
you don't know anything about the Harrier do you?
It’s “primarily “ a Close Air Support Fighter but like the A-4, is decent in a knife fight.
There are different versions of the Harrier.
The first versions like the AV8-A in this secenario and the Harriers of the Royal Air Force are light ground attack aircraft. Of course they can use Sidewinders and guns, but they lack a radar and depend on the eyes of the pilot.
The British Sea Harrier is a multirole aircraft, specially designed for the Roly Navy. It has radar with air-to-air capability and can work as an all weather fighter or as a ground attack (also anti-ship) aircraft. It was very successfull against the argentinian jets in the Falklands war.
@@Chilly_Billythose were Sea Harriers with radar
If you're going to naval battles, learn how to pronounce the names. USS TAR A WAA (Tarawa)
For every single navy in the world? I'll get right on that Chris!
Turn that shit music down or off plz
That’s funny because I really have been enjoying the music in this game.
learn politeness please :)
TARawa