You have to be OCD to hear the OCD differences. Not enough diff as far as I am concerned. Nobody has them all side by side on a pedal board. You would never know which version somebody was playing...It's a marketing scheme to keep the OCD fresh on the market. If they didn't. The interest in the pedal would go stagnant. So they kick out a new version...That's my thoughts anyhow ! I hear slight differences with them all lined up.
I got version 1.2. I really like it. Has a little more vintage vibe to it. Also fixed any bugs that were part of the 1.1 series. I run it with the blues driver through a bassman. It’s the sprinkles on the donut.
I've had my version 1.4, or maybe it's a 1.3, for years and never really bonded with it. Well, today I threw it back on the board trying to see how close I could get it to the sound of my most used setting on my gray DOD 250. More specifically, a clone of my grey dod 250 that I built as I didn't want to risk damage to my original 78 from use. The clone sounds identical, so I tried to emulate that with the OCD. It took a bit of time and tweaking, but I got it pretty much there! The OCD has so much more gain than the 250, so dialing that back just right is how I got to the sweet spot. Also dialling the tone knob on the OCD, which is a nice feature to have, is crucial to getting the sound I'm used to. There's just something magical in the gray dod 250, that everything else based on that topology hasn't captured. The OCD can get close though. Gonna start playing with the OCD in the 250 clone's place to see how it does. It'll give me a bit more versatility with the tone knob and extra gain on tap, even though I'm not really a high gain player.
There is variation in picking on different models so this is misleading weather intended or not with all do respect. Imean the decreased volume on the 1.7 the picking was ultra delicate and precise. Got to point that out. I still enjoyed the demo.
Após a versão 3 em diante, a melhor forma de saber é olhar a identificação na parte interna do pedal, lá consta essa informação em escrita pela fabricante.
Instead u r watching utube and getting reeled into some debate with some pedantic, opinionated utuber about some issue so minor, it makes the "nuances" between OCD Versions appear monumental, in comparison. And yes, I am aware of the irony that this is exactly what I have just done! Is my subconscious really THAT averse to simple guitar practice..?! Good luck with avoiding your distractions, trying to practice!! (Good topic for a debate: Has Utube become the ultimate resource for modern guitarists, a bounty of hard-won wisdom from hardworking touring muso-types that would otherwise take a life on the road to glean just some of the vast knowledge now available in this digital hub we call utube..? Sorry, looooooong sentence!! Or! ...has the easy access to every conceivable angle on anything you could dream up, pertaining to guitars, made us numb to such privilege? Has the Monster Resource become more monster than resource? Do we use it more for distraction than education? Do we tell ourselves that watching all these guitar related videos is somehow advancing us as muso's, in the stead of actual hard, boring, monotonous, tedius (did i say repetitious?...), time-consuming old school practice?! .... And if so, is this debate itself a parody of itself....am I avoiding practice at this very moment?... Answer: (squeak!) "Yes." * Good old "1st World / White People" problems!!
The difference doesn’t matter if you only focus on theory and not on the actual sound.... Some are brighter and scooped some are more mid focused. In other words some will get lost in a mic but hey it doesn’t matter if your only goal is to play in your bedroom
0:01 clean guitar
0:05 v1.1
0:09 v1.2
0:15 v1.3
0:20 v1.4
0:26 v1.5
0:32 v1.6
0:38 v1.7
0:45 v2.0
Cleaning the volume guitar
2:15 v1.1
2:31 v1.2
2:47 v1.3
3:03 v1.4
3:19 v1.5
3:35 v1.6
3:53 v1.7
4:09 v2.0
Not your video, bro! Give credit when's due!
ua-cam.com/video/txHlJKghD0k/v-deo.html
By far the best Fulltone OCD comparison on here. Thanks man!
I like the one that says OCD on the front!
1.4 and 1.7 for the win. I have the 1.7 and happy with it since
1.4 has a nice vintage tone
After going down the rabbit hole a while back, I like the 1.7 best. I’m more into vintage low to mid gain tones.
1.7 for me.
1.7 has the most bite to it.
You have to be OCD to hear the OCD differences. Not enough diff as far as I am concerned. Nobody has them all side by side on a pedal board. You would never know which version somebody was playing...It's a marketing scheme to keep the OCD fresh on the market. If they didn't. The interest in the pedal would go stagnant. So they kick out a new version...That's my thoughts anyhow !
I hear slight differences with them all lined up.
1.0 & 1.6 for me. 2.0 wasn't as bad as I thought it would be.
I got version 1.2. I really like it. Has a little more vintage vibe to it. Also fixed any bugs that were part of the 1.1 series. I run it with the blues driver through a bassman. It’s the sprinkles on the donut.
This is awesome! Thanks!
I've had my version 1.4, or maybe it's a 1.3, for years and never really bonded with it. Well, today I threw it back on the board trying to see how close I could get it to the sound of my most used setting on my gray DOD 250. More specifically, a clone of my grey dod 250 that I built as I didn't want to risk damage to my original 78 from use. The clone sounds identical, so I tried to emulate that with the OCD. It took a bit of time and tweaking, but I got it pretty much there! The OCD has so much more gain than the 250, so dialing that back just right is how I got to the sweet spot. Also dialling the tone knob on the OCD, which is a nice feature to have, is crucial to getting the sound I'm used to. There's just something magical in the gray dod 250, that everything else based on that topology hasn't captured. The OCD can get close though.
Gonna start playing with the OCD in the 250 clone's place to see how it does. It'll give me a bit more versatility with the tone knob and extra gain on tap, even though I'm not really a high gain player.
As the tests proceeded my favorites changed haha
But 1.1 & 1.2 & 2.0 were consistently my favorites among those, glad mine is a 2.0 🙂
1.1 is still the best of them all !
What's that mean, "cleaning the volume guitar"? Turning the guitar volume down to avoid driving the pedal/amp?
Thanks for this, awesome share.
Thank you.
Parabéns pelo trabalho irmão. Muito top o review 👍👏🎸
1.1 , 1.4 , 1.7 🙏
There is variation in picking on different models so this is misleading weather intended or not with all do respect. Imean the decreased volume on the 1.7 the picking was ultra delicate and precise. Got to point that out. I still enjoyed the demo.
My dream pedal board! You know, they probably vary as much by individual unit as they do by version. Just sayin'...
what’s the guitar/amp used for testing?
What kind of pickups on your guitar?
Thanks Gmate!.. : )
1.3 for me
1.6 for me... and the 2 version is also ok... but you know I have ocd so I cannot choose... so I want them all 😉
#metoo
Damn that v 1.1 is nice
Como identificar qual a versão do pedal?
Após a versão 3 em diante, a melhor forma de saber é olhar a identificação na parte interna do pedal, lá consta essa informação em escrita pela fabricante.
Top mano
Ocd v4 amazing
i like 1 the best...then maybe 1.4 and I actually didn't mind 2.0....
1.1 and 1.6 for me, but the 1.5 might be the rarest
1:23
1:48
1:56
Esto si es un aprueba 👍🏿👍🏿👍🏿
V2 is completed fix the bug
1.5
1.1 for me, the rest sound muffled
Any one will do me...just fiddle with that tone knob.
Tiny nuance which need not to be considered. I'd rather practice more!
@AUDIOVENTURIST Most of the stupids spend the money on those variations. ;-)
You could've taken the time it took you to write that comment to practice instead. Hypocrite!
Instead u r watching utube and getting reeled into some debate with some pedantic, opinionated utuber about some issue so minor, it makes the "nuances" between OCD Versions appear monumental, in comparison. And yes, I am aware of the irony that this is exactly what I have just done! Is my subconscious really THAT averse to simple guitar practice..?!
Good luck with avoiding your distractions, trying to practice!! (Good topic for a debate: Has Utube become the ultimate resource for modern guitarists, a bounty of hard-won wisdom from hardworking touring muso-types that would otherwise take a life on the road to glean just some of the vast knowledge now available in this digital hub we call utube..? Sorry, looooooong sentence!! Or!
...has the easy access to every conceivable angle on anything you could dream up, pertaining to guitars, made us numb to such privilege? Has the Monster Resource become more monster than resource? Do we use it more for distraction than education? Do we tell ourselves that watching all these guitar related videos is somehow advancing us as muso's, in the stead of actual hard, boring, monotonous, tedius (did i say repetitious?...), time-consuming old school practice?!
.... And if so, is this debate itself a parody of itself....am I avoiding practice at this very moment?...
Answer: (squeak!) "Yes."
* Good old "1st World / White People" problems!!
The difference doesn’t matter if you only focus on theory and not on the actual sound....
Some are brighter and scooped some are more mid focused. In other words some will get lost in a mic but hey it doesn’t matter if your only goal is to play in your bedroom
v 1.4 is bull shit
?