00:25 answers for Ex 2 15:10 answers for Ex 3 31:10 go through ch 3 vocab 38:27 review of gutturals 41:20 pathach furtive (under final gutturals, pathach is pronounced before the guttural as a half-vowel; does not form a syllable by itself) 45:25 mappiq (what appears to be a dagesh on a final he) - hardens the he and makes it sound like a heth 47:25 rules for hardening/weak dagesh, and exceptions (major accents, prepositions, euphony) 1:01:35 rules for doubling/strong dagesh 1:07:50 pronunciation greatly helps with learning grammar 1:10:25 raphe (omitting a doubling dagesh)
+Yeshuas Crown Maybe if it was Israel in 1500 BC. But what Dr. Barrick is teaching is not Modern Hebrew so it doesn't really matter. God doesn't care what language or pronunciation you use. He loves you regardless. Best of luck man.
I am so overwhelmed by the amount of information in this lecture, but it was so good...O.O It all makes sense, he's one of the most coherent teachers I've ever seen, but boy is it a lot of info. I will have to watch this lecture maybe like three times, and write everything down. Thanks for sharing your lectures!
His pronunciation is strange, for he tries to make it closer to the Classical one, but it still has some Modern features mixed with an strong English accent, but that is not such a great problem, because grammatically he seems to be a really very good teacher. If he improves his pronunciation, that would be fantastic, but it is still good and useful, thx for uploading it.
I love listening to the study questions. He’s covering stuff I’ve already read in multiple grammar, and I thought I understood, but realized I hadn’t understood when I hear one of the questions that may be see a misunderstanding I had. It’s that learning curve he was talking about. Thank you so much for putting this online!
Well he is teaching ancient Hebrew which, depending on who you talk to, sounded quite different in many ways. As far how he is teaching the text, is that not the approach he takes? Taking the literal hermeneutic based on what we understand the language to mean in light of the culture it was written in?
recently discovered your classes. even without your class workbook you really make me feel like I'm picking up a lot of information. I loved your explanation of different kinds of learning, because I'm one that takes a long time for new facts to settle in.. Theres a lot of stuff there and I feel like I'm swimming in deep waters. but I feel like in a few months I will actually have a lot of it absorbed into my brain todah shalom
for people more interested in the texts themselves...inc. hebrew poetry, authentic pronunciation I guess at 5 per cent importance at most .......this goes for the painstaking attempts to reconstruct others too, eg. Latin ....why not , the main "classics" , all three. this form of Dr Barrick and many others, eg. Rev J Dobson, or Harper, is for learning. review of gutterals starts at 39 mins begedkephat at 48 mins , dagesh lene 49, dagesh fort4e at 58 mins
I am also wondering why Zondervan’s Hebrew grammar makes us divide syllables with half vowels. I did one of their exercises with the rules I learned here and they were counted wrong in the answer key. But I wasn’t getting a grade. Just wondered why grammars disagree on this point.
I believe i discovered something dr barrick when 12 min remmaing for the video to end. Instead lf whatching for small vowell and then dagesh for doubling instead try to separate into syllables. If this doednt work you replicate the before the last sound and there you have a copy of the other dagesh. Tell me what you think
Dagesh doesn't appear in regular texts. I see it sometimes in books, buts that's because the word is usually uncommon. It along with the other nikkud were invented by the meteorites. Books of poetry, and books for foreign learners, and little kids are really the only texts that are pointed. Rashi's commentary on the Torah isn't pointed either.
Yes, You are unintentionally doing your students a great disservice. Why don't you enroll in a good Upan class? Or try e-teacher, or try livemocha,com. You have great knowledge other than the fact that you are unable to understand the text from the time, culture and eastern though that the jews lived in. i have no problem with Christians being Christian, but it would help you if you started from a literal concrete translation while keeping in ind the culture and social norms of the time. Bless u
Are The Man-Made Vowel-Marks Inspired, Or Corrupting Influences? The Hebrew scholars of today fully defend the uninspired vowel manipulations that have corrupted the phonology of Hebrew. The Hebrew letters as they were originally written without these vowel marks enable future generations to “call” on the Name (see Psalm 102:18), but the Masoretes’ niqqud marks were designed to do the opposite. They divert a reader away from pronouncing the Name. They have caused great damage to the language, and caused His people to “howl.” (see YashaYahu 52:5, also Psalm 2)
There is a huge sign at the front gate that says no women allowed. "How come there's no women coal miners", probably because not very many women choose to be coal miners... You want to see more women, then sign up.
Ok big question here if ancient Biblical Hebrew had no vowels why use vowels at all. Is this not adding to the words as YHWH says not to do? This is correct Matthew 5:18 For I assure you: Until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or one stroke of a letter will pass from the law until all things are accomplished. This is incorrect because these vowel dots did not exist then and can be proved easily by looking at the Isaiah Scroll Matthew 5:18 18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished. Also the word Gentile is no where in the Tanakh or the New Testament at all Genesis 12:2 And I will make of you a great nation (GOY לגוי) , and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. So many many errors and most on purpose Over 60 warnings about Saul buried in translation errors ANCIENT HEBREW WHAT YOU WOULD REALLY READ…. Grave in Hebrew קְבוּרָה Hell in Hebrew is גֵיהִנוֹם Saul שאול Sheol שאול
Also lets talk about calling YHWH the name LORD GOD which is BAAL GAD which means the GOD OF FORTUNE Hos 2:16 “And it shall be, in that day,” declares יהוה, “that you call Me ‘My Husband,’ and no longer call Me ‘My Ba‛al.’
@@Volleyball_Chess_and_Geoguessr yeah American Indian language is similar & if you look at the Isaiah Scroll that is over 2000 years old there are no vowel points. Are you on facebook? If so go look at this it will be the top post facebook.com/groups/BibleTruthandLies/search/?query=Zechariah%2012%3A6%20&epa=SEARCH_BOX
@@Volleyball_Chess_and_Geoguessr The spoke with vowels. They read it without them. The vowel points are for pronunciation. y rlly dnt nd vwls t rd sntncs. T s nt dfclt t ll.
Keep in mind that the modern Hebrew has been distorted with other outside influences. The Responsible party that twisted the letter alef (A) into ayin (E), was by a Karaite sect called the Masoretes. This same sect began with Anan Ben David in 767 CE/AD, this sect of Masoretes (traditionalists) did not want anyone uttering the true Name YOD-HAY-UAU-HAY as "Yahuah," so they invented vowel distortions with niqqud and cantillation marks to train those reading Hebrew to mispronounce words. ALAHIM (or ALAHYM) became "ELOHIM." YAHU became YEHO. They left the name ABRAHIM alone for some unknown reason, otherwise it would be EBRAHIM today. The Hebrew root "AL" (ALEF-LAMED) became "EL." This root is not a name of any kind, it is a pronoun implying lofty, upward, highness, strength, mightiness, etc. The Israeli airline EL-AL means to go + upward. EL-AL is spelled ayin-lamed (EL) + alef-lamed (AL). YAHUAH ALAHIM fully translated means: "I WAS, I AM, I WILL BE (your) MIGHTY ONE." Conclusion: What is a vowel, or a better question would be, what's the basic & actual meaning of a vowel,? Answer: A speech sound produced without occluding, diverting, or obstructing the flow of air from the lungs. The modern letter V would not be according to the definition stated above, however the letter V back then was equal to our much modern letter U, an example would be, the arch of Titvs, today that would be, the arch of Titus. Also the letter W is also somewhat a modern letter, otherwise it's just that, A Double UU! So technically the common word known as noun, could be spelled nown, otherwise phonetically they would sound the same etc. Anyway, the vowels ALEF, AYIN, HAY, YOD, UAU of Hebrew are written down to be sounded letters. These became the Greek and Latin vowels we use in English, A E I O U. Yusef Ben MattithYahu (aka Flavius Josephus) said He saw the Name written in four Hebrew vowels (not the Aramaic script mistakenly called “modern Hebrew”). All written letters represent sounds. I submit the Masoretes (traditionalists) and their attempted alterations cannot be trusted! Due to the Masoretes, we inherited the idea it is ELI, giving the form ELIYAHU (aka Elijah). The true Hebrew name is ALIYAHU. The ALEF-LAMED is best transliterated as AL, not so much as EL.
No, his pronunciation is not terrible. Terrible would be Van Pelt, that is terrible. Bill knows how to write the letters, where watching Van Pelt write a bet is abysmal. Bill at least gets a bit of the Hebrew inflection into it, where van Pelt is totally americanized, very difficult to listen to if you understand native Hebrew at all. I think the lecturers would do better with duolingo, or with the FSI course, mix the two.
If you are lecturing in English and you use words from other languages then the flow may cause non perfect pronouncing of the language you are teaching. Hope this helps. Yes he does slip up some times with non perfect pronouncing . But I think he is great knowledge and is a excellent teacher
00:25 answers for Ex 2
15:10 answers for Ex 3
31:10 go through ch 3 vocab
38:27 review of gutturals
41:20 pathach furtive (under final gutturals, pathach is pronounced before the guttural as a half-vowel; does not form a syllable by itself)
45:25 mappiq (what appears to be a dagesh on a final he) - hardens the he and makes it sound like a heth
47:25 rules for hardening/weak dagesh, and exceptions (major accents, prepositions, euphony)
1:01:35 rules for doubling/strong dagesh
1:07:50 pronunciation greatly helps with learning grammar
1:10:25 raphe (omitting a doubling dagesh)
Chears bro
Regardless of however good or bad the pronunciation is, this is a great series. Thank you for posting it.
+Yeshuas Crown Maybe if it was Israel in 1500 BC. But what Dr. Barrick is teaching is not Modern Hebrew so it doesn't really matter. God doesn't care what language or pronunciation you use. He loves you regardless. Best of luck man.
C.
Thanks for teaching the Biblical Hebrew.
I am so overwhelmed by the amount of information in this lecture, but it was so good...O.O It all makes sense, he's one of the most coherent teachers I've ever seen, but boy is it a lot of info. I will have to watch this lecture maybe like three times, and write everything down. Thanks for sharing your lectures!
Excellent series. Thank you for making this available.
His pronunciation is strange, for he tries to make it closer to the Classical one, but it still has some Modern features mixed with an strong English accent, but that is not such a great problem, because grammatically he seems to be a really very good teacher. If he improves his pronunciation, that would be fantastic, but it is still good and useful, thx for uploading it.
I love listening to the study questions. He’s covering stuff I’ve already read in multiple grammar, and I thought I understood, but realized I hadn’t understood when I hear one of the questions that may be see a misunderstanding I had. It’s that learning curve he was talking about. Thank you so much for putting this online!
Well he is teaching ancient Hebrew which, depending on who you talk to, sounded quite different in many ways. As far how he is teaching the text, is that not the approach he takes? Taking the literal hermeneutic based on what we understand the language to mean in light of the culture it was written in?
I am very grateful for these series of Biblical Hebrew grammar. Thank you so much for sharing it. God bless
recently discovered your classes. even without your class workbook you really make me feel like I'm picking up a lot of information. I loved your explanation of different kinds of learning, because I'm one that takes a long time for new facts to settle in.. Theres a lot of stuff there and I feel like I'm swimming in deep waters. but I feel like in a few months I will actually have a lot of it absorbed into my brain todah shalom
for people more interested in the texts themselves...inc. hebrew poetry, authentic pronunciation I guess at 5 per cent importance at most .......this goes for the painstaking attempts to reconstruct others too, eg. Latin ....why not , the main "classics" , all three. this form of Dr Barrick and many others, eg. Rev J Dobson, or Harper, is for learning.
review of gutterals starts at 39 mins begedkephat at 48 mins , dagesh lene 49, dagesh fort4e at 58 mins
Thank you
Dr.Barrick sir,Can you please explain further and give examples on the question,When is the dagesh omitted in begadkhephat letters? thank you
I am also wondering why Zondervan’s Hebrew grammar makes us divide syllables with half vowels. I did one of their exercises with the rules I learned here and they were counted wrong in the answer key. But I wasn’t getting a grade. Just wondered why grammars disagree on this point.
I believe i discovered something dr barrick when 12 min remmaing for the video to end. Instead lf whatching for small vowell and then dagesh for doubling instead try to separate into syllables. If this doednt work you replicate the before the last sound and there you have a copy of the other dagesh. Tell me what you think
It is getting very difficult to follow this class now that the students are speaking out more and their answers are not always audible.
1:04:37 I understand why it is a hardening dagesh, but why is it also a doubling dagesh??? can someone explain that to me??
You'll learn to distinguish when you learn about verbs and such.
Gracias por sus lecciones, aprendo mucho, sigan adelante .
The pronunciation is a little wonky.
Welp, no exercise book, but I learned a lot, did he ever mention the name of the exercise book?
drbarrick.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/B_B_Hebrew_Grammar_2005.pdf
Is the dagesh masoretic or does it appear when there are no vowel marks and in old texts?
Dagesh doesn't appear in regular texts. I see it sometimes in books, buts that's because the word is usually uncommon. It along with the other nikkud were invented by the meteorites. Books of poetry, and books for foreign learners, and little kids are really the only texts that are pointed. Rashi's commentary on the Torah isn't pointed either.
@@arjunarya1566 "Dagesh ... along with the other nikkud were invented by the meteorites" LOL!!! ... ...by the Masoretic
@@MR-ub6sq the meteorites undid me too....
The niqquds are too small for the video quality. Too bad I can't fully feel joining their exercise in this lesson 😔
Did you mean to say that Biblical Hebrew doesn’t have a word for grandson and great grandson?
Is it really that bad?
The Master's Seminary no, everyone on here thinks they are a professor of classical Hebrew. Thank you for offering this course for free
It's not good...
@@classiqueliberal8576 If you already know what they're saying is not good, why do you keep coming back to these videos?
Yes, You are unintentionally doing your students a great disservice. Why don't you enroll in a good Upan class? Or try e-teacher, or try livemocha,com. You have great knowledge other than the fact that you are unable to understand the text from the time, culture and eastern though that the jews lived in. i have no problem with Christians being Christian, but it would help you if you started from a literal concrete translation while keeping in ind the culture and social norms of the time. Bless u
Are The Man-Made Vowel-Marks Inspired, Or Corrupting Influences?
The Hebrew scholars of today fully defend the uninspired vowel manipulations that have corrupted the phonology of Hebrew.
The Hebrew letters as they were originally written without these vowel marks enable future generations to “call” on the Name (see Psalm 102:18), but the Masoretes’ niqqud marks were designed to do the opposite. They divert a reader away from pronouncing the Name.
They have caused great damage to the language, and caused His people to “howl.”
(see YashaYahu 52:5, also Psalm 2)
why is women are not seen in this class
There is a huge sign at the front gate that says no women allowed. "How come there's no women coal miners", probably because not very many women choose to be coal miners... You want to see more women, then sign up.
How can find a worksheet?
Ok big question here if ancient Biblical Hebrew had no vowels why use vowels at all. Is this not adding to the words as YHWH says not to do?
This is correct
Matthew 5:18
For I assure you: Until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or one stroke of a letter will pass from the law until all things are accomplished.
This is incorrect because these vowel dots did not exist then and can be proved easily by looking at the Isaiah Scroll
Matthew 5:18
18 For truly, I say to you, until heaven and earth pass away, not an iota, not a dot, will pass from the Law until all is accomplished.
Also the word Gentile is no where in the Tanakh or the New Testament at all
Genesis 12:2
And I will make of you a great nation (GOY לגוי) , and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing.
So many many errors and most on purpose
Over 60 warnings about Saul buried in translation errors
ANCIENT HEBREW WHAT YOU WOULD REALLY READ….
Grave in Hebrew קְבוּרָה
Hell in Hebrew is גֵיהִנוֹם
Saul שאול
Sheol שאול
Also lets talk about calling YHWH the name LORD GOD which is BAAL GAD which means the GOD OF FORTUNE
Hos 2:16 “And it shall be, in that day,” declares יהוה, “that you call Me ‘My Husband,’ and no longer call Me ‘My Ba‛al.’
Did they really speak without vowels back then? Is that even possible? I agree I had a similar thought about adding to God's Word.
@@Volleyball_Chess_and_Geoguessr yeah American Indian language is similar & if you look at the Isaiah Scroll that is over 2000 years old there are no vowel points. Are you on facebook? If so go look at this it will be the top post facebook.com/groups/BibleTruthandLies/search/?query=Zechariah%2012%3A6%20&epa=SEARCH_BOX
@@Volleyball_Chess_and_Geoguessr The spoke with vowels. They read it without them. The vowel points are for pronunciation. y rlly dnt nd vwls t rd sntncs. T s nt dfclt t ll.
Keep in mind that the modern Hebrew has been distorted with other outside influences. The Responsible party that twisted the letter alef (A) into ayin (E), was by a Karaite sect called the Masoretes. This same sect began with Anan Ben David in 767 CE/AD, this sect of Masoretes (traditionalists) did not want anyone uttering the true Name YOD-HAY-UAU-HAY as "Yahuah," so they invented vowel distortions with niqqud and cantillation marks to train those reading Hebrew to mispronounce words.
ALAHIM (or ALAHYM) became "ELOHIM." YAHU became YEHO.
They left the name ABRAHIM alone for some unknown reason, otherwise it would be EBRAHIM today.
The Hebrew root "AL" (ALEF-LAMED) became "EL."
This root is not a name of any kind, it is a pronoun implying lofty, upward, highness, strength, mightiness, etc.
The Israeli airline EL-AL means to go + upward. EL-AL is spelled ayin-lamed (EL) + alef-lamed (AL).
YAHUAH ALAHIM fully translated means:
"I WAS, I AM, I WILL BE (your) MIGHTY ONE."
Conclusion:
What is a vowel, or a better question would be, what's the basic & actual meaning of a vowel,?
Answer: A speech sound produced without occluding, diverting, or obstructing the flow of air from the lungs. The modern letter V would not be according to the definition stated above, however the letter V back then was equal to our much modern letter U, an example would be, the arch of Titvs, today that would be, the arch of Titus. Also the letter W is also somewhat a modern letter, otherwise it's just that, A Double UU! So technically the common word known as noun, could be spelled nown, otherwise phonetically they would sound the same etc.
Anyway, the vowels ALEF, AYIN, HAY, YOD, UAU of Hebrew are written down to be sounded letters. These became the Greek and Latin vowels we use in English,
A E I O U.
Yusef Ben MattithYahu (aka Flavius Josephus) said He saw the Name written in four Hebrew vowels (not the Aramaic script mistakenly called “modern Hebrew”).
All written letters represent sounds. I submit the Masoretes (traditionalists) and their attempted alterations cannot be trusted! Due to the Masoretes, we inherited the idea it is ELI, giving the form ELIYAHU (aka Elijah). The true Hebrew name is ALIYAHU. The ALEF-LAMED is best transliterated as AL, not so much as EL.
Tov is good not beautiful!
OMG! He has NO idea how terrible his pronunciation is. How can this be????
No, his pronunciation is not terrible. Terrible would be Van Pelt, that is terrible. Bill knows how to write the letters, where watching Van Pelt write a bet is abysmal. Bill at least gets a bit of the Hebrew inflection into it, where van Pelt is totally americanized, very difficult to listen to if you understand native Hebrew at all. I think the lecturers would do better with duolingo, or with the FSI course, mix the two.
@@kentwilkens3435 What is the "FSI course"?
If you are lecturing in English and you use words from other languages then the flow may cause non perfect pronouncing of the language you are teaching. Hope this helps. Yes he does slip up some times with non perfect pronouncing . But I think he is great knowledge and is a excellent teacher