If Only Terrence Howard KNEW This Sacred Geometry On the Joe Rogan Podcast
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 жов 2024
- FREE COURSE LINK Draw the LynchPin with Sacred Geometry!
www.knewgeomet...
In this video I discuss the geometry of Terrance Howard's form called the LynchPin, which is convex shape constructed out of pentagons. As I describe and show in the video there are some inconsistencies that arise when describing the forms relationship to the subject Sacred Geometry. Many people are led to believe that the pentagons are regular with 108˚ angles and that the whole form must be full of Golden Ratio proportions because of that. That is not true! There is no golden proportions in the structure at all actually in the way he created it.
I am sure Terrace is well aware that the tetrahedron bond angle of 109.47˚, replaced the 108˚ angle at the center of the pentagons, in the construction . In addition he constructed an equal edge pentagon with the 109.47˚ angle which nullifies the golden ratio throughout those pentagons. I have discovered a way to create a Knew version of the LynchPin that maintains both golden ratio proportions and the109.47˚ angle, and therefor uniting it to a larger body of Sacred Geometry knowledge that integrates seamlessly with techniques to draw the form in fundamental patters like the Golden Seed of Life and other templates.
By reconnecting Terrance's creative vision of the LynchPin to the actual Sacred pattern language one is able to see how it is embedded into a larger interconnected matrix that is based on tetrahedral geometry. With this blossomed Knew ways to draw and build a few alternative designs to the Lynchpin drone that augment and expand the creative possibilities that can be explored for flying drones of this type. I want to thank Terrance Howard for the inspiration of this form, and I was thankful to find ways to integrate the LynchPin, in a "Knew" way, into the compendium of structures that are built on a Sacred blueprint and pattern language. Although, there are some minor modifications to what he offered, those slight adjustments are the difference between a structure that is embedded in the whole, and one that is lost in finding a connection to it. The work presented here is in the Spirit of unification.
Enjoy!
FREE COURSE LINK Draw the LynchPin with Sacred Geometry!
www.knewgeomet...
Knew Geometry Courses
www.knewgeomet...
Knew Geometry on Patreon / knewgeometry
1-1 Mentorship
www.knewgeomet...
Knew Geometers Facebook Group
/ knewgeometers
Crazy or genius he's stirred the pot for critical thinking. This could spark the minds of many to bring about positive change in a demoralized world.
Think about what? What ABOUT that form, why should we care, what's supposed to be so special about it? What thing in reality can be explained with this form? To what does this offer a better explanation than what we currently have? WTF are you TALKING about???
@@Ynox54321 you tell em! Surely your not triggered
Very well said
Look here mayne, Grab the stirring wheel and say “we in charge”…
His explanation of all things being frequency has given me tons of inspiration in finding and explaining corrolations in psychology, biology, physics, religion and history as a whole
It can be done if all the lines were curved but all the lines here are straight. The whole point of Terrence presentation is that there are no straight lines in nature so everything should be built with slight curvature instead of straight lines
And he's wrong. Straight lines exist all over nature, easily recognizable in crystalline structures.
Even with curves it STILL wouldn't form perfect pentagons. That tetrahedral structure is strictly based on straight lines.
@pfzht no crystals are nit straight lines, they're straight to the naked eye🤦🏾♂️ get an electronic microscope and see how jagged It is
Celebrities know nothing
Nope you are wrong. Nothing is perfectly straight.@pfzht
It’s obvious to see many of the commentators haven’t actually watched the podcast.
No, there is too much nonsense
@@lukiepoole9254 I watched the whole thing and the only nonsense I saw was the reactions to his research 🚶🏻
And his assumption he is the only one to know this information
True
There are already several working prototype...it actually works
WHAT works? 😂 What, a drone? You realize you can make just about anything fly if it's light enough, and you put some rotors on it?
And how does a shittier version of a normal drone prove that the lYnChpIn is dIvINe gEoMetRy and holds the kEy To tHe UnIVeRse?
"Straight line" and "1x1=1" mathematics are key to making those less efficient drones fly though :)
Why after 10 minutes of the video are you still talking about the Platonic solid derived straight line shapes in a video re Terrence Howard who explicitly demonstrates the superficiality of straight lined shapes?
i was thinking the exact same thing terrances whole point is that the mistake has been the straight lines
You do know the drone frame wouldn't work with curved lines yes?
@@lukiepoole9254 I understand yours wouldn't.
It's called waffle.
Wow. You really have a gift for teaching. I know nothing about sacred geometry (got here trying to find out about Howard's lynchpin) and surprisingly, left understanding most of what you said. Great job explaining it all! You're awesome!
Wow, fascinating insights! It's incredible how a shift in geometry angles can completely alter the perception of a design's relationship to Sacred Geometry. Terrance Howard's LynchPin takes on a whole new dimension when viewed through this lens. Kudos to the presenter for bridging these connections and offering a 'Knew' perspective that enriches our understanding of geometric patterns. Can't wait to see how this inspires future designs and innovations in drone technology!
Thank you Alot of work in this video. Terrance has got the conversation going. All good 👍
Wonderful 👏👀 My dad Clark Richert was part of the Team that developed the Zome Tool. Terrence Howard should hire you for his design team🤞 I found you in my quest to understand that epic but confusing interview. I’m so glad I did and look forward to watching your other videos 🙏🌞
The charlatan Terrence doesn't deserve George.
Terrence is an American ACTOR.
@@lukiepoole9254 was an ACTOR, lol. Now’s he’s a modern day champion for the intersection of geometry, math, science, technology, spirituality, art and mysticism we’ve been waiting for 🌞🤝🌞
@@marxxthespot Then why he makes so much mistake and make an insane claim that there is no such thing as straight line in nature, even when the REAL picture of atoms and molecules as shown by the Nemescope, contains energy lines?
Every great philosopher, Scientist, musician, architect, engineer, writer etc have all mastered other crafts and were magnificent in other forms of art, creativity or science as well. I don’t understand everything I hear but a lot of what Terrence is saying is making sense. Look up Walter Russell. He’s a great example of what Terrence is like
Terrance believes that there are no straight lines as straight lines bend under force. So with that thinking each of the straight edges would have the ability to shorten where needed to produce a stable shape. The lynchpin would need to be flexible in order to attach multiple together.
What? 🤣 He was talking about at the smallest levels like what you measure an atom at and smaller
@@Nocturnal2010The same applies to the atomic level obviously. Fractal geometry.
Vibrating spheres are the bases of reality, over the axis of time are frequencies, therefore nothing is truely a straight line, we just average the frequencies and make something imaginary, a straight line
The debate in a nutshell is about .009 difference in the top 2 strut lengths and .02 difference in the 2 side strut lengths. Howards lynchpin structs are all the same unit length.
Seems you have it down. Invent it then genius. The world's been begging for it.
@@ryanroberson9499 😂 nah
@@ryanroberson9499 The worlds been begging for it? Begging for a fucking pentagon? This is some of the stupidest shit I have ever seen. All the shit going on in the world and .009 (A cunt hair) difference in a pentagon is the trending topic here. You have got to be shitting me.
sounds like a maple leaf drone challenge needs to happen :)
Using basic geometry and the flower of life is nothing new. It's the basic foundation for replicable geometry. As for your lynchpin and the flying device - there is no data to suggest it is somehow superior or an advancement. It's just using available geometry
As someone who studies sacred geometry and with a foundation in math and science and an interest in ancient texts - I've read most of what is out there. I even have a channel on geometry constructions.
It's sad to see the innuendo, hyperbole and claims being made. Terrence doesn't have any new theories or anything advanced. He has a good memory and is repeating things he read online and saw in videos. Even his idea that the space between things is some key is nothing new.
Putting the flower or seed of life on top of photos as some do - or saying there is no such thing as a straight line - is nothing special. We have non Euclidean geometry. He doesn't explain his applications and makes references to parents, points at the flower of life and says a bunch of nothing
But yet he secured 97 patents before disclosing the info. Also, we always KNEW about the flower of life, but he is absolutely the first to represent it in this fashion. Others focused on the pedals, remember?
@@ryanroberson9499have you read his patent citation list? He basically put his name on long existing ideas.
Except for golden ratio
@@ryanroberson9499 he has 8 patents none of them related to science or technology
@@lukiepoole9254 the golden ratio is easily found with two circles.
You know he was using the negative spaces within the curvature of the tree of life to derive the shapes, right? Hence not pentagons and not straight sides.
If he really was, he wouldn't use straight lines lmao. And yet the tetrahedral structure has a FIXED angle of about 109.5°, which can only be achieved with straight line for that design. Cannot be pentagon, cannot be hexagon either. Terrence is wrong.
@@lukiepoole9254 it'a a prototype design with approximation. the angles of shape are not the point. the point is the use of the negative space within the 3D version of the tree of life to derive new angle conjugations.
@@FiresideWithGavriel the design produced a super inefficient drone so what's the point?
@@lukiepoole9254 Gavrielshaw is correct. I believe that you are looking at this in a 2d form and not 3d form. If you step out of what you have been taught and know to be right you would see the theory. The program you are using is calculating from a formula that will only see this one way. The program is not using or calculating with the negative spaces. Remember " the angle of the shape is not the point"
@@natedondero7890 I'm not even calculating anything. It's just a tetrahedral shape. What gives?
As a commercial drone operator this airframe is extremely inefficient. The thrust vectors are working against each other for stability. It's not what you want in a scaled system
Only if these idiots would've understood
I imagine that’s true, as I said I’m really not aware of that field of research and the actual efficiency of the flight. So I am really just analyzing the geometry that the form is based on.
Try it out first
@@ElinaCmd yeah hard pass
ua-cam.com/video/LGPOkZxf5F4/v-deo.html
Great and interesting staff! Can you also connect several Maple leafs together as the linchpin Terrence is show in one of the drone video. 👍
I’m going to look into that question. It looks like it should work in some way because the 109.5 angle is now consistent throughout the whole structure
Right or wrong I have noticed a lot of new sparks into physics, math and geometry as a reaction to Terrence’s claims.
I myself have always glimpsed into these worlds but never had so much interest as I do now.
Ummm, you're using straight lines, isn't that the problem. Don't they have to be curved slightly?
Terrence HIMSELF uses straight line. Don't you find that contradicting?
I think getting the key angles figured out is the start. If there is more to learn about this form, there needs to be a foundation of information to work with.
He doesn't care about that. His concern here is to cast doubt.
George and Frank top two mentors currently leading in lawful projections...
That concave makes me think of the geometry of the 8 faced pyramids in Egypt. I'm curious about that angle geometry on those 2 outer pyramids.
Hi, nice speculation. This is a deeper grove than the one on the pyramid this is much shallower. Thanks for watching.
@@KnewGeometry I see that and changed my question. ❤
All we would need is spherical geometry to arise naturally in the Universe and it could form a process of spherical symmetry forming and breaking forming the potential for the Plato’s idea of a realm of forms. As a continuous, on-going, process this geometry could form entropy, disorganization, with the potential for evermore complexity. Forming not just physical complexity, Platonic Solids and cell life, but also the potential for evermore-abstract mathematics.
It’s cool that you want to market angles as a new variant. There is no 1 shape to liquid. Good video.
I notice that you use all straight lines. What Terence begins his argument with is there are NO straight lines, that those are guesstimated signs for calculation , just guessing markers.
Terrence HIMSELF use straight line.
Hmmm, I guess you are choosing not to see all the circles beneath the lines in many of the drawings. I use all circles and then add the lines.
We don't want you to think like us... we just want you to think... 💡 #Rayspeakz
So cool, great work George!
Terrance is more of a creative investor than an inventor, in my perspective. But the fact that he is mentioning any of this stuff in the collective *sphere* is great!
Thanks for giving some credit to Michael Evans. I enjoyed your interview with him and was able to buy a set of those pieces from the 70s.
What I’m curious about now is Mr. Howard’s planetary recreation using the lynchpin? I thought he said it was used for that also, but maybe not.
I love the linch leaf 😊
Makes you wonder if he's being paid to divulge
I appreciate your knowledgable explanations. I had trouble following Terrence's ramblings. I think T just "borrows" others ideas. But you actually understand it all.
You also need to look at Michael Evans work, I’m not sure if Terrence has come across his findings independently or was influenced by Michael Evans
Never the less, I’m so glad it’s receiving attention
I did videos on Michael’s work and also interviewed him , check it out
What’s your thoughts on what Terrence is saying, specifically about the shape Michael has been talking about for the last 40 years
@@gcg2927 I'm planing on doing a follow up video on that at some point
@@KnewGeometrythanks. I'll go check it out
Michael EVANS and I will be doing a Knew Conversation on this in the next few days. Stay tuned
I find this "field of study" incredibly boring. I tried though.
Geometry and art relates to spirituality. If you find it boring, try science : p
@@lukiepoole9254 Thanks for the recommendation :P
I seen 2 different vids of the lynchpin drones in action and 1 just flew alright but the other one was flawless.
Your video title is genius. That's how you work the algorithm 👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾 I literally clicked because of that...and the actual topic 😁
I think he said he used 120 degrees?
That would not work either...
Doesn't work with 120 since it is based on tetrahedral structure. Do some research on crystals.
he used the phytagorabn comma or something like that he said
Math is counting. 0, 1, 2, 3...
Addition
0+1=1 apple
1+2=3 apples
And so on.
Subtraction is reverse.
3-2=1 apple
1-1=0 apples
And so on.
Zero isn't a quantity.
Multiplication is counting in sets. Any sets of 0 apples is sill 0 apples.
1 set of 1 apple = 1 apple
1 set of 2 apples = 2 apples
1 set of 3 apples = 3 apples
2 sets of 1 apple = 2 apples
2 sets of 2 apples = 4 apples
2 sets of 3 apples = 6 apples
Division is reverse.
6 apples divided into 2 sets is 3 apples per set. And so on.
Like the word multiplication in math the atom is named incorrect also. The word atom is derived from the ancient Greek adjective atomos, meaning "uncuttable" or "indivisible". We have divided it into over 200 of the subatomic particle zoo with the accelerator/colliders.
Accounting money is strictly addition and subtraction. No where in accounting is money being multiplied.
E = mc^2
What value for energy?
What value for mass?
What value for the speed of light squared?
Solve for each expressed in an equation with values. The value of Pi is 3.142... The value of Phi is 1.618...
Why is the speed of light squared called a constant in the equation?
Why is the equation called energy-mass equivalency?
University level stupidity are deer in the headlights when ask to solve with values.
Average layman stupidity think the equation means energy and mass are equally the same. That equation would be E=m. They also think the speed of light is called a constant because the speed of light is constantly the speed of light in a vacuum. How cute.
C = 2 π r
Pi (3.142...) and 2 are constants and will remain the same values in the equation. Circumference and radius are in relation to meet equivalency of the equation.
E = mc^2 There are no units of measure that directly tie the equation together.
E = m × c^2
15 = 3 × 5
Solve for mass which has a value of 3.
m = E ÷ c^2
3 = 15 ÷ 5
Solve for light speed squared which has a value of 5.
c^2 = E ÷ m
5 = 15 ÷ 3
In the example: Energy is 15. Mass is 3. Light speed squared is 5. 15=3×5 Light speed squared will always be 5 as a constant. Energy and mass are in relation to meet equivalency. Mass could be 2 instead. The equation would be 10=2×5.
What kind of stupidity do you think Terrence Howard is making in his "loops" math? Terrance Howard certainly isn't the first to introduce the geometries between the bubbles and petals in the Flower of Life. He has patents now, not cool.
Did we always count 0123? What’s the point for 0x anything or 1 x anything if both are the same result? Is the speed of light absolute or does it depend?
Would like to know your answer, thanks.🙂
Hi, I think checking out abstract algebra (Socratica has really intuitive videos on this) could be a bit fun and also help understand why having 1 and 0 are helpful to serve as identity elements for multiplication and addition respectively, this allows us to solve equations in a consistent way. Although I'm not sure if this answers your question, but certainly we don't need to count up, for example the clock, we use mod(12) or mod(24) which indicates the cyclic nature or numbers on the clock, same can be done for binary (mod(2)). I hope this helps in any way.
@@americatunedright1211 Also, do you mean the speed of light in vacuum or in a medium? Both of these are different, and the difference can be seen physically by the bending of light rays in water or also through the process known as Cherenkov radiation.
@americatunedright1211 Math is conceptual. Concepts can only reside in the mind or minds as abstract ideas. The universe followed mathematical laws way before any human minds. The universe must have mind. Many animals have an ability to process and represent numbers, arguably a form of counting. The Venus flytrap can count to two and five. One mammoth and another mammoth makes two mammoths. Two mammoths are better than one mammoth for the clan. Zero mammoth, the clan starves. That's where we began learning mathematics. Go back to cave dweller kindergarten and learn how to count mammoths. We are still learning mathematics from nature/universe, it's part of science.
@@jeannelson8403The same response to you as I responded to the comment above with an addition. Light doesn't require medium to travel. The speed of light in a vacuum, what a constant is in equations. Do you believe that they are the same? 😝
Your still looking at things in straight lines. Howard's idea is all curved lines. So you will never come to the same conclusion. This is that stupid.
Terrence design is based on STRAIGHT LINES lol
He contradicts himself
And you can't form perfect pentagons on tetrahedral structure
it can be done. you should try again
Nope. Construct the 3D geometry yourself
I’m not even a mathematician and the little piece of paper diagram that you gave was not even remotely close. The entire purpose is for the natural curvature of nature in computation and physical development of the reality around us, therefore, representing this on a Euclidian two dimensional flat plane surface like paper of course will not give you the results that you’re looking for these results are based on a three dimensional universe of I don’t particularly care to say terryology theory of mathematics but it does hold some merit that quite possibly we need to redefine the way that we do math in our universe. The best way to do that is to take for value what they are. I’m just saying what reality do you multiply one of something and still have one of something, you can’t multiply two dollar bills and still have one dollar
How about you construct the design in 3D and found out that Terrence is WRONG?
1+1≠1×1
not if you measruing the negative space between circle. they are all concave
Not the same.
Great video as usual. Much love, brother George.
so you pretty much fixed his model.
pretty cool. good vid! well played Mr. Knew, the Knew Lyncpin and the maple leaf.
Thank you all my awake brothers and sisters that are in support of Terrence Howard ! I don’t know if this gentleman is taking into consideration, curved versus straight lines, remember, Drnvalo Melchezadec, pardon, my spelling, anything that’s negative out there travels in straight lines and angles, Not on the curve or Fibonacci golden mean
What " length of the frequency" (sic) are you using?
This is very confusing.
Questions:
1) What is that geometry represent for?
2) What is it use for?
3) How do we use it?
Still confusing. Look like some kind of art form without any application whatsoever.
Sacred Geometry is the key for human kind to evolve to the next levels of consciousness, only now are things becoming more clear and it appears that our global leaders have been absolutely telling the biggest lies and deceit that any one can commit to another human! Disgusting how religion has been basterdised into oblivion just because the christians thought to monetise their religion ... now look at the mess you all created. So Sacred Geometry needs no one religion at all, this can all be achieved by your self ... if you should like to take your experience to the next level, if you do not desire to move forward, you are free to be as you please. But this stuff is the golden key to eternity without having to say a single prayer. Unconditional love is the human key they need to bring to the table before lift off ... lets go team, do the yards with true meaning!
Yes, but you're using straight lines, and you can't make a straight line with circles/spheres. Try to see where Terrance Howard is coming from instead of just saying he wrong.
Ummm did you see Terrence’s form in the first slide the lynchpin ? Does that have straight lines?
A feature of Terence Howards design was to interconnect many of these drones. What shape is best for this?
I share how that can be done with the maple leaf in the following video a missing key to Terrence Howard’s sacred geometry
Yes, sorry I missed that. I guess you have looked into Nassim Haramein's 64 tetrahedron grid and have some thoughts how these connect?
@@EskolainenKarma With what I shared the connection can be made, because both are based on the tetrahedron.
The nodes define the geometry fractal. The edges are what you intentionally express on this fractal as the Architect/Designer to suit your defined purpose. Take a soccer ball. Nodal geometry will remain consistent BUT the edge and angles of intersection change. Depending on the imposed internal and external pressure interaction - as a representatin of a static ball just sitting there. Now kick the ball or sit on it. Why should the line and not the node remain true?
A pentagon has 108' and 72' geometry not 109'. Your pentagon is tilting forwards and giving you distorted angles. Project your drawing 90' from the face of the pentagram to get the correct angle and line length.👍😊
The core of the design is based upon tetrahedral structure, which has a FIXED angle of about 109.5°
It can NEVER forms the 108° pentagon.
If only someone would make a video explaining this in detail.
@@lukiepoole9254 a pentagon has five corners each of 108 degrees, you can't fit five 109 degrees corners with the same side length into a circle. 👍😊
The 19 flowers used as a drawing board, you can draw a bigger flower with 2 seeds in one and use the drawing board to transfer energy in curves and starting with 1 in middle, in 1 swoosh you can curve out 33 step flower where 33 is full circle.
Channel all 12 in 333333.3.. lightspeed to invoke the cosmos.
The 6x 2 curves around the orb in the middle each uses 3 little seeds from drawing board while drawing the bigger orb.
With downloads from cosmos I wrote fresh LoP'ies which tell a story why channeling a flower invokes the cosmos. The faster the packet the less stretched it is in cosmos and 1 can pick it up.docs.google.com/document/d/113vkoYwSzHH7gchiXQhqdrb5xc1jBesR/edit?usp=drivesdk&ouid=101871124692733981527&rtpof=true&sd=true
6x2 curves +last curve #32 going from middle to
Full circle is 3 more seeds from drawing board.
drive.google.com/folderview?id=1GxoOJIMrs2trSKcAwIyXy5ucIQPKF5TL
Here, all flowers
Give them 12 names. They're your buddies for life.
Its easy to said , i thought of that before. If so, why didnt you say so or call it by a different name?
What other name?
All this falls under them 97 patents bro lol
How are you so oblivious to the points he was making? 🤦🏻♂️. So frustrating!
I think you missed the point about the straight lines....they "appear" as real in our material world, but it is impossible to describe or calculate the fabric of reality with straight lines or zeros, because they simply don't exist nor they can't exist, and going down the pipe of platonic solids with straight lines is a dead end.
Truncated triakis tetrahedron could be the next extension from the maple leaf. Truncated triakis tetrahedron comes from voronoi of diamond lattice.
Will look into that thanks
If, you payed any attention to what was said, that nothing in the universe has a straight line. Everything works on a curvature. So, I think you should go back to the drawing board.
You get the flower at the beginning
He said no straight lines in nature. So since that drone is not natural but made by man what is the ?
That’s what he said, then why did he build a drone with them? Contradiction there right. I did not say no straight lines, so there’s no contradiction in what I’m showing you.
you forgot to take out the straight lines
IF ONLY YOU COULD FIND A WAY TOO CONTACT HIM AND LET HIM KNOW YOUR VIEW AND TRY TO BRING CLARITY FOR ALL
This is cool. Much more informative than the Weinstein-Howard debacle.
The idea was for unlimited mid air bonding. So you can merge drones mid air to a unlimited point to life anything reguardless of weight 🤔
Building from sisal flower salk rounds to 3,4,5,6 sided 3d light wieght panel construction this way...
I'm going to have to get a drawing program. My father and brother were design engineers while I am on the mechanical side.
You have not discovered nothing but strait lines ! And please do show your pattens
Funny how so many is riding on terrology wave... let it flatline already. lol He is nothing more than a Walter Russell echo
I like what Terrence is doing. I always wondered why humanity takes the teaching of men in a time where they thought the Earth was flat as law.
Is this similar to there are "2 sides to every coin" .....However, "They are all part of the coin"?🤔
Frequencies and vibrations
Terrance is a genius in his very own right, and yet this cat who knows geometry kinda gives off the inference that Terrance knows nada? Dude you should just practice your hobbies in your own space without trying to demoralise others in your quest to be known as brilliant cat on the block. The minute anyone goes rogue in their comments is the moment they believe they are holier than thou, and you don't need to knew geometry to be this connected dude. Michael R Evans can verify the things you have touted Terrance to be wrong with not a problem at all. Either you have a grudge with Terrance, or the media spin doctors have created an algorithm for their products from your comments of Terrance not knowing his stuff ... who cares dude, you have a nice life and try not to degrade other human effort to bring people on board for this sacred journey we face ahead - I guess no one has told you what you ignore when you speak. Terrance for president is all I can say for someone who cares about evolution on earth. Terrance was very intelligent that he went to the patent store before he fired his light sabre, this cat is on point and you know it dude. Terrance Dushon Howard is light! Thank you for your contributions and we have nominated you here in NZ for your services. Love and respect to all ; >)
Hmmm, I wonder where the respect was in this post? And just so you know I did a video with Michael R. Evans yesterday, basically because he was unacknowledged by TH. But I imagine you may find fault in me sharing that too...
Love to All
@@KnewGeometry name dropping gets u nowhere bro, you are who u r....
Try building these geometries using Terences revelatory maths😅
The flower of life is an operating system our eye and mind use to create depth. The reason the Parthenon steps and straight lines have slight curves to appear square to the human eye. That’s why there is no straight lines.
It's called optical illusion
@@lukiepoole9254 right but why would that work is the question. How can you make several curves that appears straight. I think it’s got a lot to do with how the eye and brain generates a sense of space, maybe using a grid of curves?
Yes - the seed and flower of life have been used with constructions to make replicable geometric shapes.
It does not do much else. What it does is amazing and led to where we are now. The compass is the greatest tool in human history. But a lot of what Terrence is saying is nothing. Using big words and the latest catch words to say not much
ua-cam.com/video/OaHrhmN-4wg/v-deo.htmlsi=a2M5SkHlYxUTzcex
Great work
Can u give me hexagons angles and lenght ? Great work bro
Of the Maple Leaf? Here they are: If the two long edges of the hexagon are length 2 then the other four edges are √3 (1.732). Two angles (top and bottom of the elongated hexagon) are 109.471 and the other four angles are 125.264˚. Enjoy!
@@KnewGeometry exact and fast 😇🪷 PRECIATE it
I had same idea
Been already working it
But maybe I need to seek advice from you...
Could maple leaf function if it was curves?
I do really appreciate response
And u r good guy and creative
Thank u allot ,big respect 🪷
@@tajrad-963 feel free to email me
But how does this explain how 1x1 is 2?
@@Tropophobia that’s a s different topic, and in a recent interview Terrance said he only used that as a metaphor to challenge the status quo…
@@KnewGeometry so his shape isn’t based off the idea that 1x1 is 2? I must’ve misunderstood him on the view I thought he was saying his shape could prove that 1x1 is 2.
@@Tropophobia yeah the shape is not based on it
Maple Leaf Of Life✨💫❤️🤩
Those pyramids in Egypt are perfect and is said through tunnel vision of the clairvoyant can be seen.
Maple leaf can be the Canadian version 😅
Idk brother.. feel like he would know this already. Dude’s spent a ton of time & this seems like a bridge you would have to cross quite soon in the process.
It's not really his idea.
If you google search him
The result is "American ACTOR"
This is very interesting. My mom crochets. The instructions patterns look like algorithms. Guess they are.
I asked her, Do they work for blankets, yes. When working in 3D patterns does it work, no.
Funny, she always figures it out by adjusting the algorithm!
Also funny, mathematicians realized this a few decades back and crochet themselves.
Independent discoveries! 😂
we are supposed to be working together to better our situ, when people delete comments, you show exactly who you are. you use someones name, bc you know people will look it up but then your out for just yourself.
I never deleted a comment. What I shared is about working together. You just don't see it that way. And of course if I am discussing the sacred geometry of the Lynchpin I will use Terrence's name!
I just saw the new Joe show and they talked about the 108 and 109.461xxx degrees being necessary to work. That was their secret.
@@420TheGrow do you know of Martin Fleishmann?
@@420TheGrow that’s what I said and many people in the comments freaked out here and started throwing stones. Anyway I am happy the truth prevailed and was revealed
@@psyopswitch I’m going to look him up now.. why? What’s his deal?
If he believes that there is no straight lines in nature, I wonder why he draws it with straight lines?
bro typical colonizer all u did was repeat Terrance but tweak it and present it as if its new
Respectfully; simply corrected, then presented a new Knew form.
Absolutely not! Sacred geometry and the exploration of it is free too all. I’m exploring his work through my experience and saw inconsistencies with the form. I’ve been aware of the form for years now and drew it way back then. I have no interest in making a patent on any of this. Just sharing my love for the subject and presenting some modifications because I saw they led to improvements in connecting the form to other structures. I explore this material with an open creative mind, and not with agenda. I’m happy Terrence shared his work as it helped me learn more about the structural relationships I shared about. So I thank him for his contribution, and just because he first had the idea does not mean it cannot be expanded on by others creative flow. Otherwise it would be a dead subject, and I find it to be alive and ripe with many possibilities, that for me have nothing to do with the intention of stealing and instead is all about the expansion of consciousness that does not operate with the quality you suggested. Peace
@@KnewGeometry geometry deals with shape not numbers..the form was correct all u did was get into the typical digital mindset instead of being analogue
@@clarkkent52 Analogue Definition: something that is SIMILAR or COMPARABLE to something else either in general or in some specific detail. Sounds like that's what I did. Lots of shapes in this presentation.... Sorry to burst your bubble that form constructed that way does not work. Get yourself some Regular pentagons (5 -sided shapes with 108˚ angle) and try it with your own 2-hands
Like Terrence did?🤣
Cool. Thanks ❤
Your right on time for this video, I love it when you correct the record. I am a firm believer in God's Geometry that Euclid describes.
Well that’s too bad, no sense in him making the Lynchpin out of pentagons. Contradiction?
@@KnewGeometrywithout saying anything further, 😁
Nature dose make strait lines just go walk out side look at all the strait lines?? He is talking about semantics the earths electric grid pattern makes strait lines in the pentagon shape. The people who built the pyramids knew the strongest shape in nature is made with strait lines.
We are talking about the geometry that was used when the gods made or reality for our organic VR head set we wake up to everyday. I can see that all this is just prime mates fumbling with vines trying to make a rope. Haha. My mind is like gods and like him im all alone in this knowledge. I hope to vanish in to the fog and have to stop all this.
And wasn't it absurd that he felt he needed to patent everything. What a dolt.
Whats wrong with patenting hard work? He already lost the VR patent for a delay in early fee payment
@@ewolz😂😂😂he mad because the man patented his work so guy like this can’t steal or try to reinvent his work
@@ewolzI don't think it was fee related. I suspect his patent was encroaching on existing patents.
I’m not interested in ever making a patent on this or stealing his work….
@@ewolz anybody can patent any idea or thing but the proof is in the actual usefulness and also if it actually works.
And really, such things that benefit humankind should be open source for all to use.
Questions alot for you 3 years ago ... wow and you only say something now... and you wanna bash dude ... some people ... let me herevypu has the patterns ...
What do f they are concave?
Tetrahedral structure like that is an inverted form of tetrahedron in itself.
I just completed my 3d print of a lynchpin. UA-cam short on my channel.
Terrence Howard genius method actor. 🐰
With your brain working in that way,maybe you will discover something different from him,but,is possible something good or better for humans ,keep going and try to understand the flower of life in your own way.
The universal one
Terrence sa8d multiple times there are no straight lines thats why youre javing trouble
He's a pretty good actor and is good at memorizing lines but I don't think he actually knows much.
He knows how to lie
He is right only the children of the light get to travel the universe like Enoch and others. The Creator comes and gets you to show you who you are.
Remember there's also a creater who is not the CREATOR.
Grateful
Sound like you trying to steal Terrence work
It's all patented, apparently
Steal? Terrence contradicted himself by saying straight line doesn't exist in nature yet that inner tetrahedral structure is STRICTLY based on straight line. Nature's straight line is easily seen on crystals and quasicrystals. He's a charlatan.
😂😂😂
more like making it more efficient i would think by keeping everything in phi proportions
He is giving a lot of credit to Terrence. Stop spouting nonsense
Now you trying to own his idea 🤦🏾♂️
What George expose is the ERROR of Terrence, not 'own'. Watch the video fully instead of skimming it.
@@lukiepoole9254 depends - if your definition of own is to batter into submission - G kinda did.
hi
Guru
TY
Nifty.
Make it a gyroscope.
????
Profit.
I couldn't give my attention to Terrence. He seemed all about Metatron's cube. Did he even mention the Kathara/ Crystal grid? I found him to be a charlatan.
He's done more for popularising geometry and maths than most boring scientists. Charlaton or not.
Get your head out of your ass! He's doing good work and waking people up!
@@antton9623 site, that's great this stuff is filtering into lamestream, no matter who sold their soul for the street cred and notoriety but if it's wrong info, and we all know MOST people will take his word (because he's 'somebody') and never even venture into the rabbit hole. So what is good about bad info. It just creates more stupefied zombies parroting false info...
@@antton9623
As I was saying, Dan Winter also thinks he's a charlatan, tho he does give him credit for captivating the attention of many youngsters but points out that it's a shame he is misleading them all with FALSE information ua-cam.com/video/RBoj2WKD18Q/v-deo.htmlsi=TMvZW4nopuk4fagx
@@ryrilo5078
He's misleading those who do not know any better.
ua-cam.com/video/RBoj2WKD18Q/v-deo.htmlsi=TMvZW4nopuk4fagx