Terrence Howard: "This is The Best Kept SECRET in The ENTIRE WORLD!"

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 тра 2024
  • ✅GET YOUR FREE NUMEROLOGY READING HERE:
    bit.ly/numericalreading
    ✅SELF-HYPNOSIS AUDIO PROGRAMS: Reprogram Your Subconscious Mind
    bit.ly/2RGCade
    ►►►Check out Terrence Howard's Book (free!!!)
    tcotlc.com/
    TIME STAMPS:
    0:00 - The best kept SECRET in the Entire World
    5:57 - Chemicals
    11:06 - The Flower of Life
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    ►Copyright ©:
    Script - BE INSPIRED
    Narration - BE INSPIRED
    Footage is licensed through Videoblocks, Artgrid, and Envato.
    Music: Epidemic Sound / Audiojungle / Envato Elements
    Interviews / Video References were used under FAIR USE LAW.
    © BE INSPIRED CHANNEL - All rights reserved
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    For any concerns or business inquiries, please contact us at:
    beinspiredmanager@gmail.com
    AFFILIATE DISCLOSURE: there may be a few links in this description that, at no cost to you, will earn us a commission if you choose to click them and make a purchase
    Don’t worry, we only recommend products we know and trust!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 7 тис.

  • @sarahfairchild399
    @sarahfairchild399 Місяць тому +2743

    Considering the public education system was established to "create good workers not thinkers" this doesn't suprise me much. Am glad Terrance is talking about this.

    • @princeekeson12
      @princeekeson12 Місяць тому

      Education = Indoctrination

    • @atomatman3104
      @atomatman3104 Місяць тому +16

      NOTHING FAIR IN A CHILDS PLAY

    • @junkman7901
      @junkman7901 Місяць тому +111

      1 x 1 = 1. It’s not 1 apple x 1 apple it’s 1 apple 1 times
      This is basic math and why terry failed school, because he’s dumb

    • @robby3467
      @robby3467 Місяць тому +41

      @@junkman7901 Yeah, what is this video about? It has to be some kind of April fools gag or something. I mean, otherwise it's total bs.

    • @dionpaschini4536
      @dionpaschini4536 Місяць тому

      They hide the truth of everything why because someone long ago new what the human mind could accomplish if only the truth was available

  • @dnoordink
    @dnoordink 23 дні тому +357

    "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing"... and "It's not what you don't know, it's what you know that just ain't so" come to mind.

    • @polaris7314
      @polaris7314 22 дні тому +5

      A fatal truth indeed, thank you! Most people have no idea how terribly they misunderstand some of the key things in life.

    • @user-un3zl6xx2d
      @user-un3zl6xx2d 21 день тому

      @@polaris7314 Here is my key thing: If you're a wife beater I don't care how smart you are.

    • @Captain-Obvious1
      @Captain-Obvious1 21 день тому +12

      "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing" You just destroyed the entire video.

    • @Ratko_Suzic
      @Ratko_Suzic 21 день тому +2

      Why most videos of this matter lately have orbs flying around in them..?

    • @eaturmeatornopuddin
      @eaturmeatornopuddin 21 день тому +4

      Fun fact: the more knowledge you know, & open up to the world about it. They label 🏷️ you as a terrorist plain & simple just like that old South Park episode

  • @Rose-gt2yi
    @Rose-gt2yi 17 днів тому +241

    Respect to anyone who says, “I’m willing to bring the truth at whatever cost that comes with it” then stands on what they say.👏🏻👏🏻

    • @Ceeceelea
      @Ceeceelea 15 днів тому +1

      ❤️❤️❤️

    • @rcormonutube
      @rcormonutube 14 днів тому +6

      Too dramatic for this snake oil...

    • @georgie8609
      @georgie8609 12 днів тому

      Refreshing

    • @Rillip
      @Rillip 12 днів тому +2

      No. No that's not how science works.

    • @thebatman911
      @thebatman911 12 днів тому +2

      Yeah, even if they're wrong!

  • @rozeongaro
    @rozeongaro 11 днів тому +48

    Finally I understand why maths was never mathing in my brain

    • @julioelado31
      @julioelado31 3 дні тому

      To my understanding 1 is the King of prime numbers since it has no multiplier effect upon itself

    • @janisyoutube
      @janisyoutube 2 дні тому

      But do you understand it now?

  • @danielo2704
    @danielo2704 22 дні тому +430

    For the 1x1 problem, which I don't think is much of a problem if you approach it based on the fundamentals of multiplication. I mean correct me if I'm wrong, but I would say multiplication is the number of times the addition operation is meant to be carried out on a number based on the multiplier. In other words, a x b means add 'a' , 'b' number of times. For example:
    2 x 3 = Add 2, 3 times = 2+2+2 = 6
    4 x 2 = Add 4, 2 times = 4+4 = 8
    But when it comes to the multiplier of 1, there is practically no addition operation carried out, because you are calling the number once, whereas addition requires at least two numbers to operate upon. Hence you have that number added to nothing, and that simply returns the number. The main point however is that the addition operator requires at least two non-zero numbers to effectively operate.
    For instance, in human biology, a baby only begins to form when there is a union between a sperm and an egg from a woman. However, the required "union" to begin forming a baby isn't possible with the absence of either element, because the "union" requires the presence of both elements last I checked.
    In a similar vain the mathematical operator of addition needs at least two numbers in between which it can operate. Hence, multiplication by 1 only presents one number before the addition operator and nothing on the other end. Hence nothing added to the first number returns that number unchanged.
    It's quite a crazy thing to try to explain, but not so much so as to ruin the foundations and principles of mathematics in my opinion.
    《Edit》I think a helpful way of viewing the multiplier is to see it as a count of the number of times a number or an object is operated upon. For instance:
    2x3 = sum(2, 2, 2) = 6, conversely
    3x2 = sum(3, 3) = 6, and similarly
    2x1 = sum(2) = 2, conversely
    1x2 = sum(1, 1) = 2, hence
    1x1 = sum(1) = 1
    Look closely at the last three and decide if mathematically speaking 1x1=2. I personally don't see the possibility.
    furthermore, when dealing with objects:
    bx3 = sum(b, b, b) = 3b
    bx2 = sum(b, b) = 2b
    bx1 = sum(b) = 1b, or b for short.
    I hope I haven't complicated it with the last part, I just thought it might help illustrate it further.
    《Edit 2》
    On account of the interactions with comments I've gotten to learn a bit more and attempted to understand the position of those who agree with 1x1=1+1=2.
    I've also seen a few comments that attempt to use my illustration as justification for the proposition of 1x1=2, so I feel the need to make this edit while leaving the original comment unchanged in all fairness to replies already made.
    Some have said that my logic of:
    2x3=Add 2, 3 times=2+2+2=6 should translate as well to
    1x1=Add 1, 1 time=1+1=2 as Terrence would suggest. I tried to clarify that in the original comment, and as well in the first edit, but let me give it one more go. I hope I phrase my thoughts better this time.
    I think part of the confusion, especially when you multiply two of the same number is to assume that the multiplier is part of the additive process. In actuality it is only instructive about the count of the number being multiplied.
    So 2x3=2+2+2, if you count the number of 2s on the right side of the equation you count 3. But 3 in itself is not being added, meaning 2x3 is not 2+3+3. Similarly 3x4=3+3+3+3, and we count 3, 4 times on the right hand side. If we switch it up 4x3=4+4+4, we count 4, 3 times.
    Where I think the confusion may arise is when the numbers are the same, one may mistakenly think that the multiplier is offering more than the function of a count and think it is part of the addition.
    So 2x2=2+2, but keep in mind that the second 2 is just telling us the count. And similarly 4x4=4+4+4+4, the second 4 is just the count, even though coincidentally 4 is also the number being multiplied.
    Hence, 1x1=1, because the instruction is to return one INSTANCE of the first number, which is 1. Hence it doesn't follow for 1x1=1+1, because this returns two instances of 1, which is otherwise expressed as 1x2. If it is still confusing for you, then try the following according to my logic, and then afterwards attempt it with Terrence's logic:
    By my logic-
    4x1=4 (here count/instance/multiplier is 1)
    1x4=1+1+1+1 (here count/instance/multiplier is 4)
    By Terrence's logic since
    1x1=1+1, hence it seems he suggests 4x1=4+1
    I maintain that the laws of math and physics may be based on approximations and assumptions, but they are sufficiently adequate to refute the two mathematical arguments that Terrence highlights in his talks. If he seeks to uproot a system, then it means the alternative must surpass the first in logic, application and whatever areas that were found lacking.
    As for the other things, I'm no expert in them, and I think there may be some gems worth exploring. But as hopeful as I may be that something new and exciting be discovered, I maintain a healthy mix of curiosity and skepticism. Thanks

    • @belathewhite6173
      @belathewhite6173 21 день тому

      Terrence Howard is an idiot, its brutally painfull. Hollywood actors should stay away from serious things. thanks for your clear explanation that should allow even the dumbest human to understand how it works.

    • @sanderscupac7829
      @sanderscupac7829 21 день тому +37

      So simple if you have an HONEST mind and not looking for self gradisement.

    • @RM-jc1gr
      @RM-jc1gr 21 день тому +3

      It's a statement.

    • @jdude7650
      @jdude7650 20 днів тому +62

      You sir, just may be more practically intelligent than this whole video.
      Thank you for your explanation.

    • @SimiMode
      @SimiMode 20 днів тому +62

      What Terrance might be trying to highlight, which you might have missed is the significance of the number 1. This is unlike other numbers in out universe. The significance of the number 0 and number 1. If 2*2 give 4, and everything times and added by itself give a surplus, why doesn't the number 1 leads to a surplus? Adding the egg + sperm is taking the argument to another direction. The key might be that humanity have not yet understood the significance of the number 1 besides the fact that we can it a prime number.

  • @tovah2276
    @tovah2276 Місяць тому +220

    OMG…….MY ENTIRE LIFE I HAVE FOUGHT AND GOTTEN NOWHERE WITH THE SIMPLE FACT THAT 1X1 IS NOT 1.
    I HAVE SAID THIS SINCE I WAS 4 1/2 YEARS OLD. I am in TEARS watching this. I have said this my whole life. I could NOT go into Physics or Mathematics for this reason so I went into Medicine and stayed OUT of R&D because I could NOT challenge the syllabus OVER AND OVER!!!!
    I HAVE SAID THIS FOREVER….I sent this to my mother and she called me back the second she was done watching it and was absolutely silent for a good 30 seconds and then said “Honey, I do not know what to say…..you have said this since you were almost 5. I knew you were always ahead of the curve because you were reading at a University level in Grade 3…..I don’t know what to say…I am so sorry. I didn’t understand……”……
    I am gobsmacked.

    • @Diligently2U
      @Diligently2U Місяць тому +10

      You should reach out to him.

    • @Diligently2U
      @Diligently2U Місяць тому +12

      I think he just explained the reproduction of the universe.

    • @willyorca5364
      @willyorca5364 Місяць тому +38

      1 x1 is 1 ,dont ridiculous dude come on Terrance Howard Is on cocaine.

    • @Jerry-sn4nx
      @Jerry-sn4nx Місяць тому +15

      Wow! That’s insane.
      I’m 54 and although this makes perfect sense now this isn’t something I even considered questioning. That being said I firmly believe we’ve been lied to about sooo many things including our very recent past……
      Congrats to you this must be the eeeight of the world off your shoulders in a way…

    • @vinced6554
      @vinced6554 Місяць тому +41

      1 once = 1, no addition takes place if there is only 1 number, hence 1 x 1 = 1.
      he shows that 1 +1 = 2, but that's not the same as 1 x 1, that's the same as 1 twice, therefore 1 x 2

  • @mathieudubois8849
    @mathieudubois8849 10 днів тому +36

    The guy pushed the "3am high asf conversation's at a random party with the weirdo guy" to the next level

    • @MegaJo123456789
      @MegaJo123456789 9 днів тому +2

      It's now three am and I'm getting high n drunk while watching this, cheers buddy I'll pour one out for you 🍻

    • @DJ_FENYX
      @DJ_FENYX 8 днів тому +3

      And look at all of the people buying it. Lmao.

    • @martolomew956
      @martolomew956 8 днів тому

      ​@DJ_FENYX why, how do you know he's wrong?

    • @DJ_FENYX
      @DJ_FENYX 8 днів тому +1

      @@martolomew956 Because I paid attention in school and understand basic math. The idea that 1x1=2 does not make any sense, nor does it work. Show me undeniable proof that it does.

    • @meeerreacts2220
      @meeerreacts2220 8 днів тому

      @@DJ_FENYXwhy doesn’t it work ?

  • @FredMeyer-no3ji
    @FredMeyer-no3ji 12 днів тому +119

    Your videos were great!! I'm one of your viewers and have been watching your videos lately. I would like to invest, but I still can't find the right investment to commit to. I will appreciate any help here.

    • @workjax
      @workjax 12 днів тому

      I always wanted to trade crypto for a long time but the volatility in the price has been very confusing to me although I have watched many UA-cam videos about it but still find it difficult to understand.

    • @DesTiny-jh4cn
      @DesTiny-jh4cn 12 днів тому

      It makes sense that BTC and crypto are of helping to regulate, rather than pretend it won't ever happen.
      The big institutions getting In is the catalyst that will laugh us made they grow used to it becomes a nonissue usually because of their fears never materialize.
      And benefits they were unaware of before turn out to be more beneficial

    • @MarkLawrence-pr3sj
      @MarkLawrence-pr3sj 12 днів тому

      Trading is easy, but trading the right coin without a time-tested strategy is incredibly hard.

    • @HarrisMorgan-iv1vh
      @HarrisMorgan-iv1vh 12 днів тому

      My advice, never do shorts or longs on stocks or #crypto
      most people went bankrupt better buying in parts monthly

    • @Raphaelsmith-ri6fb
      @Raphaelsmith-ri6fb 12 днів тому

      I've been in touch with a financial advisor ever since I got into the market. Knowing today's culture The challenge is knowing when to purchase or sell when investing in trending Crypto, which is pretty simple. On my portfolio, which has grown over overboard and been making about $1 500 bi-weekly, What I'm trying to say is the 5% of traders in the world that are consistently profitable are very reserved, they are just random/lowkey people no one even expects. My account manager chooses entry and exit orders

  • @LittleGhost1979
    @LittleGhost1979 23 дні тому +399

    I struggled with math all my life because my mind doesnt see math the way they teach us. Terrence is on to something brilliant.

    • @jeffk7290
      @jeffk7290 23 дні тому +29

      Unless today's education system is bent, Mr Howard is not on to anything.1st, x³ does NOT = 2x. It = x times x times x where x is any number. So it's like saying a number multiplied by itself 3 times. Ex: 3 x 3 x 3= 27. THIS is 3³. Similarly 2³=2 times 2 times 2= 2x2x2=8. IF the current educational system is teaching otherwise, then there are ignorant leaders in the system or the books have a misprint. In either case Mr Howard is incorrect at this time. So for those who are not mathematically inclined I hope for your sake the books are a misprint. From someone with a math and computer background.

    • @MochaMoray
      @MochaMoray 23 дні тому +3

      Same give me shapes and math suddenly makes sense

    • @sonsoflightinc
      @sonsoflightinc 23 дні тому +15

      Same here. I'm having to defend my comment because my algebra teacher gave up on me after 1 question that stumped him for like 15 during class. Just goes to show you that Mr. Howard may be on to something. But anytime there is a breakthrough, it will always be question. No matter what field it's in.

    • @Charles-jo8ub
      @Charles-jo8ub 22 дні тому +8

      Algebra geometry made no sense to me.

    • @laraoneal7284
      @laraoneal7284 22 дні тому +2

      Why so many spelling errors here.

  • @larrymansfield9393
    @larrymansfield9393 21 день тому +400

    I will never look at Terrence Howard as an actor again, wow!

    • @NeotheOne88
      @NeotheOne88 21 день тому +28

      I had NO idea this guy was this intelligent 🤯

    • @clevertaco306
      @clevertaco306 21 день тому +29

      @@NeotheOne88 He's not. But the not so smart people think he is, unfortunately.

    • @clevertaco306
      @clevertaco306 21 день тому +21

      Yeah, now he can be looked at as an idiot too.

    • @LylyNynx
      @LylyNynx 21 день тому

      @@clevertaco306 another sheep in place to keep misleading everyone. go back to your depths.

    • @akritasdigenis4831
      @akritasdigenis4831 21 день тому

      ​@@clevertaco306I bet your iq is below 90.

  • @Keno_23
    @Keno_23 14 днів тому +53

    It makes perfect sense to me… Like a light switch. I have mad love & respect for Terrence Howard. That energy that is within up which is why we are more charged when we place our bare feet on the earth it channels through known as “Grounding” whereas we wear rubber soles on our feet to block out the connection. We are conductors of electricity & the earth contains endless power .
    It is said that if on the right frequency we have the ability to heal ourselves & fix parts of us that are broken. Whereas Dr.’s & pharmaceutical companies run hand & hand when it comes to causing addiction, disease, & dulls our senses. Money & Power! Which is why if something that can better you & your health is not acknowledged & approved by the FDA then insurance WILL NOT cover it. (THEY WANT US TO HAVE THESE ISSUES) without them they will lose money, power, & control.

  • @monkeyking617
    @monkeyking617 19 днів тому +11

    This is really quite simple folks. When you have a multiplication problem, draw it out as a grid. You have your starting number on one axis, and the multiplier on the other axis. Now count how many squares you end up with, that is your answer. This is why the dimensions of a room are described as “square feet“. If you have a room that is 2 linear feet x 2 linear feet, make this into a grid and what do you get? 4 square feet. Now what if the room is 1‘ x 1‘? Look how many squares you have, you have “one square foot“. No, it is not intuitive, which means that your intuition should be questioned and there is learning required. What kind of an argument are you going to make that your intuition must be always correct, without instruction?

  • @lisariggio6916
    @lisariggio6916 Місяць тому +1824

    This is why I failed math,it didn't make sense to me

    • @rayderian2212
      @rayderian2212 Місяць тому +54

      Lol

    • @JordanBondhus
      @JordanBondhus Місяць тому +35

      Yes you may have failed, and only “You can decide if you are an expert”

    • @MrChriscoleman2030
      @MrChriscoleman2030 Місяць тому +87

      It went over my head as well 😂😂
      I didn’t know that this actor was that smart, absolutely brilliant man!

    • @topgmedia4702
      @topgmedia4702 Місяць тому +104

      @@MrChriscoleman2030how can u say hes brilliant when u dont understand it?
      What hes saying is wrong & its very easy to disprove him thats why nobody takes him serious

    • @vivveq
      @vivveq Місяць тому +8

      touche!

  • @kyonatbest6591
    @kyonatbest6591 25 днів тому +285

    The easiest way to explain the squareroot of 2 conundrum he proposes is instead of using squareroot of 2 specifically, we use squareroot of x. This can then be written as x^1/2.
    For the first example, he calls for the result to be raised to the third power, so the simplification of this is x^(3/2).
    As for the second example, he calls for it to be multiplied by the number itself before it was square root. So for example his case would be 2*(2^(1/2)). In x terms, this can be simplified as him saying x(x^(1/2)). In order to simplify this further, you need the denominator to have the same number before adding them up, so this becomes (x^2/2)(x^(1/2)) which then simply becomes x^(3/2). It's the same result as the first example.
    His fallacy is what he chooses to represent as x. X was simply the number before he started the squareroot businesses. Because of this, the number 2 isn't anything special, the number 2 is suppose to be his x in this example, the reason why it doesn't work for other numbers is because for other numbers to work, you simply have to use other numbers. If I had taken squareroot of 3, then it would be 3 as the coefficient.
    You can in fact test this. x^(3/2) is the first example, and for the second example, just try x*(sqaureroot of x). The logical fallacy is his bad assignment on the unknown variable x that led to his second example being wrong and being faulty believing 2 is a static coefficient when in reality, it's x*(squareroot of x).
    So for example 5^(3/2)=11.1803398875 and 5*(squareroot of 5)=11.1803398875. Try plugging this new equation with any number you can think of and it will hold true. There is nothing wrong with the Math, Terrence just has his logic wrong.
    The reason why he gets away with what he says is because he says it to people who aren't Mathematicians and brings it up in a public space for you to just tap away into a calculator without putting real thought into the logistics behind his fallacy. He brings it up in a public space where you have to listen to him and take his word at face value instead of testing and figuring it out yourself whether he is right or wrong. Hence, stop listening to celebrities talking out their ass. If a real Mathematician ever believes our foundation is wrong, they would definitely let you know lol
    As a side note, the guy seems like a con artist that's also a celebrity. He can lie about what he says but he says it with the belief that he's talking the truth that people can mistaken him as a genius. He seems to have lied about his education background several times and tried to scam Uganda at one point as well. Yes, I do mean the WHOLE country of Uganda, just search it up.

    • @marcelosinico
      @marcelosinico 25 днів тому +64

      Don't waste your math here.
      Those people are delusional. They want to believe in anything that makes them feel good.

    • @stephencarter9352
      @stephencarter9352 25 днів тому +33

      During his Oxford Union lecture he explained that his theory only applies to the number 1 and 2.
      So we hear you when you say “any value can be plugged in as X such as 5” , but I’m just letting u know he addressed this.

    • @AncientAli3n777
      @AncientAli3n777 24 дні тому +8

      Yeah i saw the interview, the guy basically said he's trying to sell Uganda or help them make Hydrogen bombs if i'm not mistaken. 😂

    • @daveklein7053
      @daveklein7053 24 дні тому +10

      It appears that you are still struggling with Concepts of math for instance can you adequately explain this: "Exomnium" "Very roughly, a (discrete time) dynamical system is set X together with a function f:X->X. The behavior of the system with some given initial condition x*0*is governed by the recurrence relation x*n+1*=f(x*n*). A classic example of this is the logistic map." ? In other words it probably does not make much sense to try and find the most "advanced" area of mathmatics as most fields are advancing in time and 'parallel'. Mathematicians are not necessarily aware or the goings on in every field. What do you say of polyadic measures of statistical dependency using information theory?

    • @grantfryer407
      @grantfryer407 24 дні тому

      🤔 oh yes I see now.!

  • @Str0ng4ev3r
    @Str0ng4ev3r 13 днів тому +58

    When I see individuals like Terrence Howard boldly sharing their discoveries with the public, it fills me with joy. Their openness fosters the creation of new knowledge to be tested. Yet, amidst their courage, some in the comment section, armed with degrees in science or engineering, claim authority over all knowledge with dismissive remarks like 'a little knowledge is dangerous.' Fine, let it be dangerous. But where is the depth of their knowledge? Where are their contributions to science documented? In this era, even those lacking true understanding can graduate with honors, only to assume roles of authority in the field. I urge them: if science truly matters to you, go beyond mere words and criticism. Get to work, document your findings, and strive to stand alongside the brave souls sharing their discoveries with the world. Until then, your knowledge remains as buried as a rock underground. Educated individuals often harbor doubt and fear, while the seemingly lesser possess courage, confidence, and resilience.

    • @liontradingLdn
      @liontradingLdn 12 днів тому +3

      "Looka here mane..these mathematicians ain't shit mane "

    • @Atadistance70
      @Atadistance70 12 днів тому

      @@liontradingLdn ua-cam.com/video/sA1EdinaKeQ/v-deo.htmlsi=cExJQrwndtjyZCqo

    • @KadarOfficial-lg2zr
      @KadarOfficial-lg2zr 11 днів тому +5

      People with science degrees are pissed at him because they would have to go re/unlearn they're entire profession if he was proven or believed to be be right by the masses... They think oh we got this far with half baked science no turning back now 😐😕

    • @patrickshepherd1341
      @patrickshepherd1341 10 днів тому

      ​@@KadarOfficial-lg2zr is that what you think? Because I'm pretty familiar with math, and I can make a pretty case that his mathematical suggestions are just flat ignorant, not revolutionary. I'm guessing you've heard him talk about loops? Nonsense. And I can show you that it's nonsense really, I'm not just saying that.

    • @patrickshepherd1341
      @patrickshepherd1341 10 днів тому

      ​@@KadarOfficial-lg2zr also, you don't need degrees to understand why he's wrong. It actually only takes like 4th grade math at a maximum to show how dumb this is.

  • @beebee4334
    @beebee4334 29 днів тому +387

    I recall watching a documentary about a man that became a math genius after getting beaten and robbed. He had a brain injury that created a savant level of mathematical understanding. And his vision also changed, in which he saw every object in life made up of FRACTALS (curves like Terrence says here). You can probably Google it and I’m sure the story will come up. The guy was interviewed lots of times. He had to go to back to University in order to begin understanding his new genius, because he didn’t have the formal knowledge and language to explain what he could see visually and calculate in his head. Fascinating story! And his description of what everything in the Universe is made of, matches what Terrence is saying from what I can tell.

    • @aya9af
      @aya9af 27 днів тому +35

      Jason Padgett. Thank you for posting that. It led me to discovering him and his work/art. Blessings 🙏🏽💗

    • @rechtsanwaltzak5878
      @rechtsanwaltzak5878 25 днів тому +11

      What am I reading . And i am qurstioning my everyday being

    • @tastymorsel
      @tastymorsel 25 днів тому +3

      ​@aya9af can you give me a link or the name of this person?

    • @jenifernadeau
      @jenifernadeau 25 днів тому +12

      ​@rechtsanwaltzak5878 awesome.. you are Awakening to your true starseed Lightworker self❤
      They don't want us to know who we are..we're just incarnated here via various lifetimes in a human costume to experience this Earth School.
      Nothing to fear❤

    • @tovah2276
      @tovah2276 24 дні тому

      @@aya9afare you saying the person that @beebee4334 is talking about is named Jason Padgett or was that a comment to someone named that? Sorry, I need more sleep but would love to know if you found the link of if the persons name that bee bee is talking about is indeed Jason Padgett. THANK YOU if you respond. I LOVE researching TBI’s and their outcome especially when it is such an outcome like this one. NOTHING ceases to amaze me and yet EVERYTHING CAN AMAZE ME!!🙏🏻🙏🏻❤❤

  • @endasil
    @endasil 22 дні тому +351

    The fine art of dragging out a video as much as possible without ever having to get to the point.

    • @prayunceasingly2029
      @prayunceasingly2029 20 днів тому +12

      There's no point in my opinion. Just convoluted basic math

    • @RonWrightwrites
      @RonWrightwrites 20 днів тому +44

      @endasil yeah, that's why I watch 15 seconds of a video, then look at tons of comments and then discern whether it is worth it to finish watching the vid based on the feedback that others have given.

    • @LokimonWasHere
      @LokimonWasHere 20 днів тому +16

      Thanks now I know not to waste my time watching this 😊

    • @coreyfreeman6226
      @coreyfreeman6226 19 днів тому +37

      He got to the point. you need to rewatch it until you get it. The point is, we cannot advance as fast as we could with approximated math. Our math needs to accurately match the universe if we are to visit other galaxies, make better tech some of which can be self-healing etc. With the right math we can eradicate death etc. Everything in the universe is perfected math in various states.

    • @rumrstv
      @rumrstv 19 днів тому

      Sounds like you're trying to turn math into a new religion. Math only reflects the universe. It does not control it.

  • @GutoHernandes
    @GutoHernandes 19 днів тому +9

    This video is a good analogy for an LLM. It sounds like human speech, it's made to sound like high level reasoning, but it's just words that form sentences that have no actual meaning or logic.

    • @asdfds6752
      @asdfds6752 7 днів тому

      LLM hallucinating = Howard new theory! 🤣

  • @TruthInYourFace
    @TruthInYourFace 15 днів тому +4

    Take the Square Root of "4".
    1. Multiply it by "2" (Result: "4").
    2. Add "2" to it. (Result: "4").
    Divide the Result by 2, then perform Operations 1 & 2 again.
    OMG!!! WE'RE GETTING THE SAME RESULT FROM 2 DIFFERENT MATHEMATICAL OPERATIONS ON THE SAME NUMBER NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES WE LOOP THROUGH THE STEPS .
    We're finally seeing the results from removing "Math" as an essential subject to graduate from GRADE SCHOOL.
    And by the way, another term for "multiply" is "groups of". So when you "group" something ONCE (i.e. A x 1 ), you're NOT ADDING OR REMOVING ANYTHING FROM IT.
    (watering crops with Gatorade doesn't seem too far away)

    • @henrlima87
      @henrlima87 8 днів тому

      But.... its got what plants crave!

    • @JerubaalXerxes
      @JerubaalXerxes 5 днів тому

      1x1... take 1 then multiply it once. You get 2. So even 2x1 should be take 2 multiply it once you get 4. 2x2 take 2 multiply it twice I end up with 3 groups of 2 if you say the answer is having 2 groups of 2 where is the original 2 you made copies of?

    • @lukeatbrandynightful
      @lukeatbrandynightful 4 дні тому

      @@JerubaalXerxeswhy are you making simple math’s complicated. Multiplying is just another word for ‘groups of’, 1 group of one apple = 1 apple. 0 groups of one apple = 0. A five year old understands this

  • @Jnrbebe
    @Jnrbebe Місяць тому +481

    Everything will be revealed... Because we are in a final chapter... People are starting to be awake to their counciousnes..

    • @DrifterSpirit9
      @DrifterSpirit9 Місяць тому

      There are so many things that are getting revealed lately,so many things being all of a sudden admitted by the leaders of churches,so many rights being handed to people as it should,so many climate changes going on,so many informations released to the people...I also believe we are reaching that final chapter of this endless cicle.

    • @MrSaljstn
      @MrSaljstn Місяць тому +35

      Worldwide conscious shift incoming

    • @v1kt0us
      @v1kt0us Місяць тому +2

      @@MrSaljstn ... and it will be called "AGI or ASI" 🧐

    • @SP-rx4tb
      @SP-rx4tb 28 днів тому +21

      This is a NEW book not a final chapter it’s like a lost book of truth we have found ppl are the pages

    • @FontanaForex
      @FontanaForex 27 днів тому +1

      You right brother letsgoooo

  • @MrChriscoleman2030
    @MrChriscoleman2030 Місяць тому +716

    I didn’t know that this actor was that smart, absolutely brilliant man!

    • @dorissetto4343
      @dorissetto4343 Місяць тому +3

      Amen !

    • @atomatman3104
      @atomatman3104 Місяць тому +7

      YOUR A GODAMN ACTOR TO YOUR ACTING RATHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT,LMAO

    • @atomatman3104
      @atomatman3104 Місяць тому

      @@dorissetto4343 YOU LIKE MEN ? LOL ONE MIGHT CHECK THE MEANING OF A WORD BEFORE USING IT,LOL IT MEANS MANY THINGS BEYOND YOUR INTELLIGENCE

    • @junkman7901
      @junkman7901 Місяць тому +68

      He’s not very smart unfortunately, he just used a lot of buzzwords

    • @chazrooks4681
      @chazrooks4681 Місяць тому +30

      ​@@junkman7901 can you rebut anything he's said?

  • @anons1sefcik184
    @anons1sefcik184 9 днів тому +12

    This Man Is Genius!!! The flower of life is Created By Frequencies. IF you take a small Bluetooth and set a metal round Pizza pan on top of it, then sprinkle salt all over the pan, turn a frequency on over the Bluetooth, the salt will begin to rearrange it's form into the the flower of Life... its very satisfying to watch different frequencies and how they can change things from the inside out and the outside in..

  • @bukdays
    @bukdays 2 дні тому +1

    There are two major flaws in his logic…
    x^3 = 2x = x+x
    This might seem weird, but this only holds for sqrt(2)
    So x^3 = x*x*x
    Let’s put x = sqrt(2):
    sqrt(2) * sqrt(2) * sqrt(2)
    = (sqrt(2)*(sqrt(2)) * sqrt(2)
    = 2 * sqrt (2)
    Which is the same as 2x and x+x, with x = sqrt(2)
    The reason x^3 = 2x in this case, is because the ‘2’ we see in ‘2x’ is the square of sqrt(2).
    The second flaw
    4/2 has inverse operation 2*2 (correct), yet saying that concludes the inverse operation is 2/1 is 1*1 is false.
    The reason the inverse operation of 4/2 is 2*2 is because 4/2 = 2, so to find the inverse operation we multiply the result (2) and the number we divide by (2) and this equals the number we diveded (4): 2*2 = 4
    Now lets do the same for 2/1.
    2/1 = 2, we want to multiply the result (2) with the number we divided by (1), giving us the number we diveded (2)
    this gives us: 1*2 = 2, which is the correct inverse operation of 2/1
    I think it would be very cool if we could disprove the math we use, but there are no fallacies in the equations he shows. There are only misunderstandings by Terrence Howard

    • @afrika-karibianaestudionan4050
      @afrika-karibianaestudionan4050 День тому

      It seems that he chose to refuse to recognize the difference of the "=" signs in:
      x³ = 2x ... ("=" is an equation sign)
      and
      (√2)³ = 2√2 ... ("=" is an equal sign)

  • @igot2020vision
    @igot2020vision Місяць тому +126

    The square root of 2 can be simplified to 1.41 to make this easier to read.
    1.41 cubed can be written as 1.41 x 1.41 x 1.41
    We can simplify this because 1.41 is the square root of two, meaning 1.41 x 1.41 = 2
    so 1.41 x 1.41 x 1.41 can also be written as 1.41 x 2.
    1.41 x 1.41 x 1.41 = 1.41 x 2
    The square root of 2 cubed and the square root of 2 multiplied by 2 are the same, not because of some maths breaking enigma that some "genius" came up with who says that it means 1x1=2, but because of simple maths and how numbers work.
    Also 4/2 = 2 therefore 2/1 = 1 is such a childish way of looking at maths. Take it in the other direction to see if it works, 8/4 = 4, oh wait, not it doesn't. Because you cannot just half or double all of the numbers in an equation and have it make sense.
    3 x 5 = 15, but 6 x 10 does not equal 30. 4 x 4 = 16, but 2 x 2 does not equal 8. Because you cannot simply double or half all of the numbers and have it make sense.
    This is one of the most frustrating things I have witnessed recently and I hope people go and seek actual education or actually think for themselves instead of listening to this video and taking your word as gospel. This is in your face misinformation, for what reason?

    • @outlawedTV88
      @outlawedTV88 Місяць тому

      Nope, sorry you have been brainwashed in school given those false equations that do not mean shit in nature and have nothing to do with the reality of things, one more tip for you Zero does not exist in nature - anywhere!!! Its just a number therefore all math is false

    • @alanhull-ii5ip
      @alanhull-ii5ip Місяць тому

      You never educated yourself when it come to taking the vaccines you took either 😂

    • @parnikaa2849
      @parnikaa2849 Місяць тому +12

      Exactly what I was thinking, everything else makes sense. The equation 2x=x^3 has real world solutions, which are 0, -1.41 & 1.41. You could also do the same with the square root of 5, 7 or any number for that matter. It's food for thought but at the end of the day the square root conventions do remain the same, this is what I've concluded atleast.
      Infact, you could do the same for the cube root of 5. 5x=x^4, where x=cube_root(5). It's something like the nth root of a certain number y = x and x raised to the power (n+1) is :
      where n=root number,
      y=number whose root is taken,
      x= nth root of y.
      I would've loved to believe something new in mathematics but logic and intuition still deem these humanly correct. It is human made convention but from our level, it does explain a lot, for me atleast.

    • @parnikaa2849
      @parnikaa2849 Місяць тому +7

      And the part about 1x1=2 doesn't sit right if you're using the modern base 10 number system. If you take the one to the other side. The part where he used 2x2=4 for comparison is a different thing since 2 is the square root of 4. 3x3=9, 4x4=16 etc all make sense because when you multiply a number with itself, you get its square. Following this pattern, 1x1=2 would mean 1 is the square root of 2?
      Sorry for the rant, feel free to correct me or share more insights.

    • @j_r28
      @j_r28 Місяць тому

      Man! That's just what I commented, I was trying to find if anyone already pointed it out. But let me tell you this 95+% people on the planet are dumb, they don't understand or question basic principles, now wonder that guy has millions of views.

  • @bennbanes6359
    @bennbanes6359 Місяць тому +259

    I'm sat here with my 13yr old son and 7 years old daughter Infront of an open fire in rural Spain. Just knowing I am sat here doing this, makes the 10yr old me very proud. Not sure many fathers would take the time or effort showing and discussing these things with their kids this. I am so super lucky

    • @j_r28
      @j_r28 Місяць тому

      Please don't show your kids about these stupid people, whatever he's saying is completely bullshit, he doesn't understand the basic math, must have missed the classes 😂😂

    • @ShifuCareaga
      @ShifuCareaga 29 днів тому

      Congrats you taught your kids to be dumber.

    • @javi8438
      @javi8438 27 днів тому +10

      rural Spain, the best in the world. Hope you enjoy our marvellous Country ❤

    • @undergroundmetals498
      @undergroundmetals498 27 днів тому +5

      That's awesome, Keep teaching them ❤

    • @bennbanes6359
      @bennbanes6359 27 днів тому

      @@javi8438 as I sit almost at sunset, eating a Plato Del Monte, everything sourced locally. I feel so grateful and lucky. Such a wonderful country ♥️♥️💪💪

  • @LindaFabuloso
    @LindaFabuloso 16 днів тому +5

    Brilliant Information..... And you executed the discussion so beautifully. thank you

  • @Love_prevails
    @Love_prevails 16 днів тому +4

    This is how 1x1=1
    I will put down 1 heart 1 time. That time will be at end of countdown.
    Ready? 3..2..1.. and

    There's 1 heart.
    Now I will put down same 1 heart, but now 2 times.
    Ready? 3..2..1
    ❤ and 3..2..1..

    How many hearts do you see??
    That's how 1x2=2
    Any questions?

    • @litoarroyo9499
      @litoarroyo9499 9 днів тому

      I PUT 1 ❤ THEN 1 ❤ AGAIN
      NOT TIME
      BUT THE ❤..
      READY?
      PUT 1 ❤️
      AND 1 ❤
      HOW MANY ❤??
      😂😂

  • @monicarward
    @monicarward Місяць тому +199

    I love this and agree with everything Terrance said aside from “death is comparable to sleeping while life is being awake”. I believe it’s the opposite. Life is comparable to sleeping and when we die, we become awake.

    • @PandaAniplex
      @PandaAniplex Місяць тому +14

      "A very interesting perspective, life is like a dream, we let our minds wander,

    • @MagdalenaShakti
      @MagdalenaShakti Місяць тому +12

      We are perhaps...always awake.

    • @sharonlee1985
      @sharonlee1985 29 днів тому +10

      Yes, I totally agree with you…”that we become awake when we die

    • @projectdesign4675
      @projectdesign4675 29 днів тому +20

      No, actually, Jesus called death "sleeping"!

    • @MJs4boys
      @MJs4boys 29 днів тому +14

      Some of us wake up before we die

  • @suichinggo8236
    @suichinggo8236 23 дні тому +88

    I'm not a math genius. But my understanding of multiplication is that it's a simplified addition. 1 x 1 mean 1 "of" 1 = 1. 3 x 2= 6, mean 3 of 2's , 2+2+2; 5 x 0= 0, mean 5 of nothing, 0+0+0+0+0. Doesn't X cube mean X times X times X? Not 2X nor X+X.

    • @buffhotchkiss7400
      @buffhotchkiss7400 23 дні тому +10

      They can't do math😂😂😂😂🎉

    • @kevinlee8732
      @kevinlee8732 23 дні тому +32

      Yeah 1x1 is 1 happening once. It's 1, one time. So it's always 1. 1x0 is 1 happening zero times. So there was never a one, it was hypothetical and that's where he is flawed in his theory here, he's assuming 1x1 means you are taking two 1s and multiplying them. You're not. The numbers are representations, not real. Like the girl in the talk said as soon as you do the math with a physical object like a laptop, one laptop, times one, is itself. It's one laptop, appearing once. One laptop plus another laptop gives you a 2nd laptop, it's one laptop, appearing twice, or two times, becoming two laptops.. 1 PLUS 1 is two. But one TIMES 1, IS Never more than 1. It's the exact number your multiplying, represented one time. That's all it means.

    • @mr.showers3265
      @mr.showers3265 23 дні тому +7

      1 plus 1 = a bigger one! 😅

    • @Chinese_MartialArts
      @Chinese_MartialArts 23 дні тому +7

      0 × 3 = 0
      How many have you got? ...0?
      No, you have 3.
      This is along the lines of Mr Howards theory. Conventional Math is foundationally flawed and thus so is our society. Conventional Maths is based on theory when basic maths is based upon physical objects.

    • @wtchoutna
      @wtchoutna 23 дні тому +7

      ​@@kevinlee8732yes, but I see both points although he is getting very literal with the wording. However he's made other good points and discoveries. Things just go back to the origins of things. For instance, why are there 10 digits? 9 if you don't want to count 0 but why not 7 or 17 individual digits for example, although I know why but what I'm trying to say is that he's going back trying to make sure the foundations are correct. I've often wondered about if say, alien math would be the same as our math you know? Have we missed something? If so, how? Where did it evolve from? It is crazy to think about if there is a much more advanced species or civilization in the universe, would they in fact use the same math as us? Or is there something that's just gone over our heads, like how many early civilizations didn't use "0" in their math. Which is crazy to think of now but is there another "0" that we simply haven't realized yet? So it's a good thing to question and re explore the possibility that our foundations could be flawed. Because there are some flaws with our system. and like, why they can't figure out the right equations to explain all of physics. I find it suspect that there seems to be two separate rules to physics because it doesn't scale down correctly. This is another example of why our math may be flawed. I don't like the answer of "because it just is[different]" so I think he's on the right path.

  • @rickmassey1272
    @rickmassey1272 13 днів тому +2

    If nothing else this video makes a person think IN POSITIVE WAYS...that is the best compliment that can ever be given...for anything.

  • @pauladavis1220
    @pauladavis1220 11 днів тому +3

    It's so Spititually beautiful to see and hearing: Divine knowledge: which is manifested throughout Elohim’s Divine Attributes:
    Intelligence Wisdom Knowledge
    Love Beauty Justice
    Foundation Power Strength
    HalleluYah!!!
    🕊🕊🕊

  • @VelexiaOmbra
    @VelexiaOmbra 9 днів тому +2

    Here's a very simple way to look at this "issue" with the square root of 2.
    1.41421... just happens to be the exact ratio where if you multiply any value by that ratio twice, you get double your starting number.
    This can be seen by the fact that the square root of 2 multiplied by itself (or squared) is 2.
    So if your starting number is 20, then 20 x (1.41421...) x (1.41421...) = 40
    If your starting number is 2, then 2 x (1.41421...) x (1.41421...) = 4
    If your starting number is (1.41421...), then (1.41421...) x (1.41421...) x (1.41421...) is (2.82842...), and you might notice, we just multiplied the same number by itself, 3 times, ie, we cubed it. There's no lie here, no error.
    When you multiply any value by (1.41421...) you are increasing it by 41.421... %
    If you increase a number by 41.421...% twice, you are increasing the first increased value by that amount in the second, so the total becomes exactly double the original value.

  • @hangfire5005
    @hangfire5005 22 дні тому +58

    Mental illness isn't always a naked guy trying to karate fight cars in the street. Sometimes it's a smooth intellectual sounding person explaining something to you that only they can understand and "They" want to keep you from knowing the truth.

    • @asgervends412
      @asgervends412 21 день тому +7

      YESSSS THANKYOU. I thought the world was going bonkers, but finally i found a sane person a

    • @SunnyCue-ew5ow
      @SunnyCue-ew5ow 20 днів тому

      Look up gang stalking organized stalking. Yea, some have lost their minds but many know its true power and hate. some can see how it's a facade behavior modification program.

    • @RyanMcClure
      @RyanMcClure 20 днів тому +9

      Preying on folks (like me) that were never strong at math is pretty low. But as a person who studied organic chemistry, I can label this confidently: bamboozel attempt, either deeply unethical or Messiah compmlex level mental derangement.

    • @anthony-kelly
      @anthony-kelly 19 днів тому +2

      Yep. Bat shit crazy.

    • @matthysuys9084
      @matthysuys9084 19 днів тому +4

      What "truth" are you talking about? The truth that we don't understand quantum physics or that Terrence Howard doesn't understand the basics of math?

  • @Downecker
    @Downecker 22 дні тому +139

    I'm 74 and in my schooling I was taught HOW to think, not WHAT to think! I always thought " outside the box" before I ever heard the phrase! Don't make choices without knowing all the facts. It's amazing how "gut feelings " stems from subconscious logical reasoning!😂 These feelings are so correct in outcome!

    • @Nacho-Mamma
      @Nacho-Mamma 21 день тому +6

      There are two basic types of thought groups:
      1) The group that follows the heart, having approximately an 40% possibility of choosing correctly.
      2) The group that follows the gut, having approximately an 85% possibility of choosing correctly.
      Now, taken in the fact that I just took a big gulp of NyQuil, and I'm high as a kite, my tongue is green, and I just pulled that out of my ass, it does sound plausible,

    • @Itsnevertolate
      @Itsnevertolate 21 день тому +5

      Exactly, it's funny how "outside the box" is most commonly referenced with multiple personalities. Most people can't step outside of the world to see the world for what it is. Nothing is what it seems.

    • @Nacho-Mamma
      @Nacho-Mamma 21 день тому +2

      @@Itsnevertolate
      It's all an illusion. I figured that out years ago, and have been told I'm insane.

    • @Itsnevertolate
      @Itsnevertolate 21 день тому +1

      @@Nacho-Mamma Yeah, anyone who does not go along with their story becomes a crazy lunatic. It's even worse when you believe in God. Anyways, there is no normal. We're all different. So there is no basis to call anybody crazy.

    • @Nacho-Mamma
      @Nacho-Mamma 20 днів тому

      @@Itsnevertolate
      "There's no basis to call anybody crazy"? Really? What about those weirdos who believe in oversized buses with giant wings that magically fly through the air? Because, those weirdos ARE crazy! Why, I bet they even believe you can row a boat to some mystical netherworld without falling over the edge of the giant turtles back! Those crazy weirdos!

  • @jessicaburgess7301
    @jessicaburgess7301 18 днів тому +2

    Wow! Just wow! I’m mind blown 🤯 I’m so happy I ran across this by mistake today 😊 I already adore this man as an actor he deserves more credit ☺️ But oh my did I not know how absolutely BRILLIANT this man was 🤯🤯✨ much love much respect ♥️

  • @Dima319319
    @Dima319319 13 днів тому +1

    The most secret kept from us is that we attract what we radiate and main thing we need to learn is how to see positive in every situation. Trues is always simple. I think moves like that designed just to keep our attention from what is really important for us.

  • @judithlabarosa9564
    @judithlabarosa9564 Місяць тому +138

    There are things that no matter what i do i just cant understand. I gave up and just enjoy life with my children.

    • @AmadeuShinChan
      @AmadeuShinChan Місяць тому +4

      You have become one of those phenomenons you talked about, yourself.😂

    • @truecrime98
      @truecrime98 Місяць тому +24

      Personally I feel like I have an obligation to my children to find out the truth as it affects their lives and their children’s lives.

    • @catchinvibes
      @catchinvibes Місяць тому +29

      Never give up. Never choose willful ignorance for the sake of comfort. Do the hard things, do the scary things! Otherwise you are not growing or using your potential. We are NOT alive to procreate and die.

    • @robwhite461
      @robwhite461 Місяць тому +3

      @@AmadeuShinChan
      Never ceases to amaze me to know of beings like you, a creature of such wisdom who likes to mock but not pass on their higher knowledge. Your no better that those who choose to conceal.

    • @chrisdaldy-rowe4978
      @chrisdaldy-rowe4978 Місяць тому +5

      @@catchinvibes Yes indeed what you have typed is true.I've allways said to my children,its easy to do nothing & in the end thats what you'll get.So go out there & live life to its fullest & along the way you will discover the 'true' you & learn to love that person as you will others.I love yo vibes m8 : ))

  • @mjl5376
    @mjl5376 19 днів тому +313

    Comment section : We dont understand simple math, but terrence howard is a math genius.

    • @Rj-nh1df
      @Rj-nh1df 19 днів тому +7

      He's also highly racist individual

    • @apaulosmith5653
      @apaulosmith5653 19 днів тому

      This is an amazing screening process to ensure only the dumbest of the dumb show up for your cult

    • @karlkarlsson9126
      @karlkarlsson9126 18 днів тому +22

      This is called, pseudoscience.

    • @sulaymantouraytravel
      @sulaymantouraytravel 18 днів тому +15

      @@Rj-nh1df the moment you start talking shit its a deflection, thats what you mofos do when you dont want to face the intelligence.

    • @FreeMan-ej6mj
      @FreeMan-ej6mj 17 днів тому +18

      ​​@@karlkarlsson9126This is not pseudoscience. This is degradation. He believes that multiplication always increase. What about 0×2=0 or 0.5×0.5=0.25. Is he familiar with complex algebra? What about qaternions? How many algebras he knows? :-)

  • @gsg7354
    @gsg7354 День тому

    So then Issac Newton was right amoung others in the quest for the sorcerers stone.
    When I was younger I loved everything for what it was. Youth/children see the world as it is but as you grow others will change your veiw to fit into that community like terrence says. I also saw the fallacy in 1x1=1 with lots of other things, But was forced to change to fit in my community. I gave up the beauty of the truth to be excepted knowing i was lying to myself for love and exceptance. And I have been trying to regain that truth it's very hard to knock down the walls you have made around you! Life is so much better when your open and excepting.
    Please don't lock yourself away behind walls of false protection they are just a form of control.
    Remember the child love is everywhere espeically in you.

  • @gloomyremnants
    @gloomyremnants 6 днів тому

    The way this was edited makes it seem incredible. I would suggest watching the full video where he’s presenting to the Oxford classroom. Thinking outside of the box at its finest

  • @krisg3984
    @krisg3984 Місяць тому +194

    It’s always exciting when a new way of thinking wiggles the brain into opening up. Quantum physics and sacred geometry is all about realizing the activity of Life Itself - deep, vibratory, and ongoing. Those that want to sleep through life, so be it. Some want to know More ! Let’s look into this now .

    • @MichaelSchwab-nk4rm
      @MichaelSchwab-nk4rm 28 днів тому +7

      Well Stated Friend

    • @gmwadams9495
      @gmwadams9495 25 днів тому +3

      I believe so too

    • @ceb1970
      @ceb1970 25 днів тому +14

      So this is where all the crazy people on the internet gather.

    • @justinjones8583
      @justinjones8583 25 днів тому +3

      ⁠@@ceb1970Define crazy…

    • @juddbiggs
      @juddbiggs 25 днів тому +5

      Realizing craziness is the beginning of intelligence?

  • @green_dog8960
    @green_dog8960 Місяць тому +98

    x^3 = 2x, so subtracting 2x from both sides, we get x^3 - 2x = 0; factoring the x, we get x(x^2 - 2) = 0; so either x = 0 or x^2 -2 = 0; from x^2 - 2 = 0, we find that x = +sqrt(2) or x = -sqrt(2). It is not an "unnatural equation"; it's just simple high school algebra.

    • @dalevross
      @dalevross Місяць тому +32

      Well said. Talking about loops and nonsense when relatively simple math can prove why. I say relatively as it's not too advanced but may be hard to follow if you failed high school math.
      I want to believe there is some esoteric truth to what he's saying but at face value it's all gibberish.

    • @junkman7901
      @junkman7901 Місяць тому +24

      Terrence just can’t understand basic math, he likes his buzzwords though

    • @giliusifrit5595
      @giliusifrit5595 Місяць тому +1

      There is no meaning of the journey. What matters is that we reach the same destination

    • @MrBlackspook
      @MrBlackspook Місяць тому +3

      Simple put you are simple wrong . There is no such thing as simple mathematics if it was simple you too would understand the laws of the universe

    • @MrBlackspook
      @MrBlackspook Місяць тому +8

      ​@@dalevross😂😂😂 SO you thunk public schools give you the tools to understand the the universe?? What planet do you live on😂😂😂

  • @MrMadness574
    @MrMadness574 8 днів тому +1

    Guys. 1 x 1 means “One, one time”. If you have 1 only once you have just 1. 1 x 2 is 2 because you have “One, two times”.

  • @MsSoFruity
    @MsSoFruity 20 днів тому +145

    Terence is talking about how everything in the universe, at its most basic level, boils down to motions and conditions, specifically those involving electricity and magnetism.
    Electricity and Magnetism as Motion: Electricity is described as a centripetal force, meaning it moves toward the center. This kind of motion can be likened to things moving inward or contracting.Magnetism, on the other hand, is a centrifugal motion, meaning it moves away from the center, akin to expansion or spreading out.
    Matter and Elements: Everything physical (matter) is essentially these motions of electricity and magnetism. These motions aren't just random but follow specific patterns and cycles-what Terence calls "periodic pressure conditions.
    "An element (like hydrogen, carbon, etc.) is not a static thing; it’s a specific set of pressure conditions that can change under different circumstances. This implies that by changing these conditions, one element can transform into another. For example, carbon under intense pressure becomes diamond.
    Perception of Elements: Our human perception is quite limited; we only see a tiny fraction of what's actually out there. For instance, hydrogen is the first element we can perceive, but there are 21 elements before it that we don't see.Elements have predictable behaviors and relationships that can sometimes seem to defy basic logic, such as the placement of hydrogen in the periodic table not following the expected pattern of having three elements before and after it.
    Universal Cycles and States: Everything is continuously alive in various states, driven by these fundamental motions. The concept of "death" as we know it doesn’t really apply universally; it’s more about different states of being. He also emphasizes the continuous cycle of existence, much like breathing where there’s an inhale and exhale, symbolizing the cycles of matter and energy throughout the universe.
    Behavior of Light: Light doesn't travel but instead reproduces through a cycle of life stages in what he describes as octaves, which could be understood as waves or frequencies of light.
    In simple terms, Terence views the universe as a complex but predictable dance of pressures and motions, where everything from the smallest element to light itself participates in continuous, cyclical patterns of existence. This view challenges traditional notions about the static nature of elements and the linear travel of light, proposing a more dynamic and interconnected universal behavior.

    • @Bassline_Rebel
      @Bassline_Rebel 19 днів тому +3

      traditional ie light in Straight line ...errr you forgot about both states of light. Our traditional knowledge Is that light is Not just a straight line But you are other points are pretty good

    • @robertadams5437
      @robertadams5437 19 днів тому +1

      He ignored the strong and weak forces, so he only has half the equation

    • @jiffyliciousfood1003
      @jiffyliciousfood1003 19 днів тому +9

      This is deep.

    • @CrouchingscarabflyingJ
      @CrouchingscarabflyingJ 18 днів тому +3

      If you want to know more check out the life work of Richard Alpert now known as Ram Dass

    • @Roy-cv8el
      @Roy-cv8el 17 днів тому +5

      How is turning carbon into a diamond an example of changing one element into another? I mean, isn't that like saying turning water into ice is changing one element to another?

  • @austinkuipers6087
    @austinkuipers6087 25 днів тому +74

    Walter Russell wrote a book about this a century ago called "the universal one"
    Literally this exact thing. A small minority of naturopaths have been using it's principles for decades (like Barre Lando), but they never get airtime and the maintstream calls them woo-peddlers whilst making billions off their toxic noncures. Kudos to Terrence for using his social capital to bring it into the light and elaborate on it.

    • @hollisatlarge
      @hollisatlarge 23 дні тому +5

      The Universal One is his bible and he actually used to carry it with him wherever he went. He’s following his instincts and he is passionate about where they are leading him. And I agree, he is the first one to bring Russell’s concepts to this broad an audience. Thanks Terrance!

    • @1chuck23
      @1chuck23 23 дні тому +2

      It was a good read. Inaccurate in a few ways, especially the predictions of assumed elements based solely on a octave basis, or everything that exists comes from light. But it's definitely like a nerd's Lord of the Rings type of read.

    • @comdala
      @comdala 17 днів тому

      In one of his books he says that he can prove how to transmute one element to other by using solenoid+electricty.

  • @magatsu82
    @magatsu82 17 днів тому +1

    "if 4/2 is the inverse operation of 2x2 = 4 then it would naturally follow that 2/1 is the inverse operation of 1x1 = 2" that's a fallacy and with its very first statment the theory crashes.

  • @Justineyedia
    @Justineyedia Місяць тому +108

    “… The sun and moon are powered wirelessly with the electromagnetic field (the Aether). This field also suspends the celestial spheres with electo-magnetic levitation. Electromagnetic levitation disproves gravity because the only force you need to counter is the electromagnetic force, not gravity".
    Tesla

    • @LifeIsBetterWithLove
      @LifeIsBetterWithLove Місяць тому

      Yep.

    • @giliusifrit5595
      @giliusifrit5595 Місяць тому +5

      Good concept, always aware of aether as I use its metaphysical power. But here you have put the rest of a wonderful theory into solid purpose rooted in reality. Thank you !

    • @macheadg5er
      @macheadg5er Місяць тому +1

      lol he never said that

    • @Dempdawg11
      @Dempdawg11 Місяць тому +1

      Where did that quote come from

    • @ymartinez3
      @ymartinez3 29 днів тому +5

      I asked ChatGPT and said this "
      ChatGPT
      No, that quote does not seem to be attributed to any credible source or recognized figure. It contains several scientific inaccuracies and misconceptions. Electromagnetic fields do play crucial roles in various phenomena, including the behavior of celestial bodies, but the statement oversimplifies and misrepresents these concepts. Additionally, the claim that electromagnetic levitation disproves gravity is false; gravity is a fundamental force described by modern physics, and electromagnetic levitation does not invalidate its existence or effects.

  • @katrinawilliams5080
    @katrinawilliams5080 24 дні тому +128

    Mr. Howard needs to be protected! He is amazing and risking so very much! ❤❤ I pray for his continued safety and look forward to everyone realizing the truth he speaks!!!

    • @jonnyfendi2003
      @jonnyfendi2003 24 дні тому

      This same fool owes hundreds of thousands of taxes and refuses to pay and brings up slavery as an excuse not to pay. Hes a washed up d list actor

    • @surafelyirefu6764
      @surafelyirefu6764 24 дні тому +15

      He's not risking anything. if he can prove it he will be rewarded. That's how science works It's not politics.
      I think he's a scammer who seeks just attention and likes. 😂😂

    • @MandyLovesYuh
      @MandyLovesYuh 23 дні тому +1

      Yes amen 🙏🏼

    • @Jim-mp3og
      @Jim-mp3og 23 дні тому +7

      ​@@surafelyirefu6764
      I'm sorry,
      but if you look at the scientific community you will find it is very political on what they can and can't say,
      or are allowed to share.
      Science is not political of course.
      But the ones that are funding the scientists,
      I can assure you they are very political.

    • @michael17750811
      @michael17750811 23 дні тому +1

      Protected from what or whom exactly 😂😂😂 oh the infamous they obviously 😅

  • @WisomofHal
    @WisomofHal 9 днів тому +1

    The identity property makes total sense. Interestingly 1 is THE ONLY whole number that is neither prime nor composite. 1 can not be factored. One is so important. There can only be one. You can not make a copy of 1 multiplied by itself. Multiplying any number by one just copies itself. It’s why 1x7 = 7. So it makes logical sense why 1x1=1 or 1^1000 = 1 you’re just attempting to copy one 1000 times.

  • @s0ulshot
    @s0ulshot 15 днів тому +1

    Terrence explained this with dollars:
    Dollar x Dollar = Two dollars
    What also could be true is:
    Distance x action = one distance passed and one action performed.
    So when you say 1 x 1 apple it is 1 apple, but if you have 1 apple x 1 apple it becomes 2.
    It sounds stupid, but makes sense, and what is funny is that 1 x 1 apple is like 1 observation of one apple that then equals to proving there is one apple.
    I think that terrence is getting at this with his "crazy talk" of there not having this nothing of a number without it having a physical representation of something in our physical universe.
    All this energy talk you can prove with physics.
    There is no physical reality as we understand it.
    Why does a sharp blade cut bamboo while a dull blade doesn't?
    It is just two energies smashing at each other with the sharp blade putting all the energy in smaller area and having incredibly amount of moving energy pushing through the other "resting" energy and both of these states give resistance against each other with the one having more intensity in smaller area making the other give in.
    Same forces are in play when you sit down on your chair or walk around etc.
    We are just energy kept together by the fundamental forces of the universe like every cultures every wise people have told us since forever.

  • @chosen1153
    @chosen1153 Місяць тому +268

    I just love Terrance Howard
    He represents
    and is
    A real WARRIOR
    A CHOSEN ONE
    🦋🧘💥🧘🤚🤚🦋

    • @bradentraub
      @bradentraub Місяць тому +19

      Except for the fact that his math is completely and utterly wrong in this video lol.

    • @outlawedTV88
      @outlawedTV88 Місяць тому

      THis has been know for many many years, He didn't invent anything new. the difference is that nobody listens to the real deal. ALL math is wrong by design. You cannot have 1 apple plus 1 more apple and still count it as one??
      Also every number multiplied or divided with zero is NOT zero. I bet they didn't teach u that too. If you have 1 apple and add zero to it how many remains? It remains your 1 apple always - THE NATURE have no zeros. IT doesn't exist - except in fake reality. That's why they explain everything in mathematical equations - its all BS.
      Also the periodic table of elements u seen here is false. The real one was hidden away from us 100 y ago

    • @godsouljour
      @godsouljour Місяць тому +6

      Yes, I'm very impressed with his ability to communicate this, and he clearly isn't faltering on it.

    • @thealchemist333
      @thealchemist333 Місяць тому +2

      I agree, he's a chosen one

    • @chazrooks4681
      @chazrooks4681 Місяць тому +6

      ​@bradentraub can you rebut his claims?

  • @toddwturneratgmail9307
    @toddwturneratgmail9307 22 дні тому +62

    We are taught in school that multiplication is repetitive addition as follows:
    1x5=1+1+1+1+1=5
    1x4=1+1+1+1=4
    1x3=1+1+1=3
    1x2=1+1=2
    1x1=1=1
    The basis of Howard's math is false therefore the rest of this math is false if it is based on 1x1=2.

    • @jnuhjnuh
      @jnuhjnuh 21 день тому +4

      "we're taught" ... What if there was a law that states you can only start a multiplication with an addition.

    • @JBZ1
      @JBZ1 21 день тому +7

      0x1=1

    • @manjukasoysa3901
      @manjukasoysa3901 21 день тому +5

      ​​@@jnuhjnuh Then you would get a different mathematics .
      Problem is people are looking for truth in mathematics . Whereas it's just starting from some assumptions (axioms) and just projecting from there. Change the axioms and you get different projections. Depending on the axioms you get more or less contradictions . That's all, there's no "real" truths in Mathematics (or nature actually )
      Also some mathematics is useful in modelling nature , others are not. Euclidian geometry was good enough for a long time, but then they came up with non-Euclidian with different axioms. Both are useful.

    • @jnuhjnuh
      @jnuhjnuh 21 день тому

      ​@@manjukasoysa3901 ... I want some pi

    • @belathewhite6173
      @belathewhite6173 21 день тому +13

      @@JBZ1 wrong, just use your common sense jesus christ. zero times ! there are ZERO 1's !! WHEN THERE ARE ZERO OF SOMETHING THAT MEANS THE SAME AS THERE ARE NONE !!! ITS ZERO !!!

  • @davefortenberry366
    @davefortenberry366 9 днів тому +1

    4:00 mark
    If 4/2 is the inverse operation of 2 x 2 = 4,
    then 2/1 is the inverse operation of 2 x 1 = 2.
    NOT 1 x 1 = 2

  • @spectronix1
    @spectronix1 7 днів тому

    (X^3)/2 = X --> X^3 -2X=0 --> X(X^2 -2)=0 --> one solution is when X=0, therefore second solution is when X^2-2=0, --> X^2=2, --> so X=sqr(2) is another solution. Also, the solution X=-sqr(2) is last solution. This is very basic algebra that is taught in middle school! Square roots of numbers come up all the time in algebra and geometry!

  • @razorsharp2526
    @razorsharp2526 21 день тому +61

    So if I give you 1 apple 1 time, I did not give you 1 apple but actually 2? Wow, this guy is a genious!!

    • @chrisbenson6683
      @chrisbenson6683 21 день тому +19

      He lost me with that and at multiply means making more. Don't get tripped up by semantics.

    • @iammichaeldavis
      @iammichaeldavis 21 день тому +14

      I can’t even start to sympathize with where Howard is coming from. Like, what is 4x1? 70x1? A million times one? Timesing by one just gets you the value that’s been multiplied by one, one time. This is so easy to understand I just can’t see where he’s gotten lost 😅
      The first page from his book shown on screen asked:
      “If 4/2=2 is the opposite of 2x2=4, shouldn’t 2/1=2 be the opposite of 1x1=2?”
      Like it’s this big ‘gotcha!’ But like…. No, man, “1x2=2” would be the opposite, big homie. This is kindergarten shit, Hustle & Flow. 2/1 doesn’t result in one, so I just can not even begin to find an inroad in my mind to how he could have so missed the bus on this.

    • @nickbailey9622
      @nickbailey9622 21 день тому +9

      4/2=2 2×2=4
      Now
      2/1=2 1×1=1
      Look at the numbers position.
      Replace 1x1=1
      With 2x1=2
      Hummm this is basic maths.

    • @qret-dv5ym
      @qret-dv5ym 21 день тому +1

      Lol

    • @edzbienen
      @edzbienen 20 днів тому +4

      Just look real quick at the other videos of this channel to understand we are in a very weird "new age" trip here
      "free your vibrations", "regenerate your body", "the third eye" all these shits, like come on...

  • @Yes24232b
    @Yes24232b Місяць тому +64

    I dont see anything weird. Just because the square root of 2 is the solution to the equation: 2x = X^3, does not mean that our math is broken. It means that the square root of two is the solution, i.e., the number that makes that statement true.

    • @rawnukles
      @rawnukles 25 днів тому +22

      yeah this is mumbo jumbo that sounds deep to people who don't understand maths and chemistry.

    • @jamescrockett3968
      @jamescrockett3968 25 днів тому +14

      ​@@rawnuklesI knew he was just spewing nonsense when he tried to say 1*1 =/= 1, but offered no alternative solution.

    • @nickleader7985
      @nickleader7985 25 днів тому +4

      This man uses cut out paper triangles to 'prove' how simple addition is wrong. With math skills like that, he should be a social scientist.

    • @JoseGarcia-rw9im
      @JoseGarcia-rw9im 25 днів тому

      How is 1 times 1 …1 makes no sense when your adding multiplying a number means to add so how can one equal 1 ? U Dan also say 0 times 1 equals 0 well if your multiplying a number times 0 should equal that number like addition …10 plus 0 equal 10 because there’s nothing to add so 1 times 0 should be 1 not 1times 1

    • @jamescrockett3968
      @jamescrockett3968 25 днів тому +13

      @@JoseGarcia-rw9im you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what multiplication is.

  • @keithphalatse9320
    @keithphalatse9320 16 днів тому +4

    All respect to my brother Mr Howard, you've been heard my teacher

  • @JENNIFERREEDteambuilder
    @JENNIFERREEDteambuilder 17 годин тому

    That is why you can heal all diseases with mineral and vitamin changes. Changing the environment, changes how the cells reproduce and interact. So if we change the CHEMICAL AND ELECTRICAL CHARGES OUT SIDE THE CELL, WE REARRANGE HOW THE CELL CHANGES.

  • @clwhite626
    @clwhite626 23 дні тому +85

    Thank you. It’s maddening how many people want to criticize him before even trying to do the footwork. I am grateful that Terrance and yourself are willing to ask the questions and do the footwork and face the backlash; so to hopefully be a part of the path to a better future for humanity.

    • @wrc1210
      @wrc1210 23 дні тому +7

      lol

    • @renograziano8464
      @renograziano8464 22 дні тому

      Yep, the proof is in the pudding.

    • @zachgroll4230
      @zachgroll4230 20 днів тому +4

      There are people that already did that “footwork” you’re talking about and they’re called engineers. It’s insulting that he believes he has some unforeseen knowledge over other people in this world and yet says things that shows he can’t understand basic mathematic principles so he just immediately thinks they’re wrong? He’s going up against hundreds of theorems and postulates that have been revised and used for thousands of years. It’s so depressing to see that people actually believe this guy because they can’t understand these concepts that people with degrees do the same way he can’t.

    • @damyr
      @damyr 20 днів тому +1

      @@zachgroll4230 I'd like to believe him, as that might bring some new sources of energy, or traveling through space, or a new idea about how to cut pizza more effectively, or whatever... But tbh, I don't have a slightest idea what th he's speaking about.

    • @Captain-Obvious1
      @Captain-Obvious1 20 днів тому

      ​@@zachgroll4230 It's a wild thing that the internet seems to be turning into a whole exploding phenomenon.
      We knew the idea that people often believe what they choose, especially when they don't understand how to test it for themselves - but we see it seems to turn them into zealots who aggressively DEFEND their ignorance, and create their own "enemies" as a mechanism of validation.
      Fallacies built upon fallacies and they don't have the basic tools to figure it out.

  • @tammyjames000
    @tammyjames000 Місяць тому +165

    Who knew? Terrence Howard has genius within him. So proud.

    • @outlawedTV88
      @outlawedTV88 Місяць тому

      Nope. This has been known a long time ago. He just saw the truth. I known this for 30 years

    • @Purvisvarietyoflife
      @Purvisvarietyoflife Місяць тому +6

      We all have a genius inside of us.. just need to dig deep in and bring it out

    • @mstone-wd7kc
      @mstone-wd7kc Місяць тому +8

      Lol you’ve got to be kidding

    • @ShifuCareaga
      @ShifuCareaga 29 днів тому +11

      He isn't. He is a fraud

    • @wasmek1126
      @wasmek1126 26 днів тому +2

      @@outlawedTV88 Nope. You're lying. You're trying to take credit for his find.

  • @ibhdarafmsayhiohw3486
    @ibhdarafmsayhiohw3486 15 днів тому

    As a university student doing a science degree that has a lot to do with math. I must say, Mr Howard would be given audience if he proved his passion for the subject by pursuing and achieving academic feets in mathematics.
    A mathematics professor with a PhD won't tell you he's a genius who has secrets of life but rather he worked hard on his passion for math. That's respectable even if you don't have a passion for math.
    The standard is the same for 99.9% of people Howard hasn't proven his an exception.
    But let's all live our lives humbly with respect for functional conventions.

  • @Teapottotty
    @Teapottotty 10 днів тому

    Sorry Terrence but this makes more common sense to me: If I only have one apple left & somebody asks me to write a sum of how many apples I have got left the obvious sum is 1 x 1 = 1 apple left. Meaning 1 (amount) of only 1(apple), which still leaves me with only 1 apple. How can I now have 2 apples unless I was a magician?
    You use your reason for your idea as some mystical notion based on the idea of 1, and yet the most mystical mathematical idea would be zero. The best idea to contemplate and find a solution to, would be the equation 0 x 1 = 0, and consider where did that apple go, and was there even an apple in the first place?

  • @Brmsg
    @Brmsg 26 днів тому +40

    I remember when I was a child , it was difficult to understand why 2*2=4 , but 1*1=1
    After learning addition where everything is clear 1+1=2, 2+2=4 . They say multiplication make it easier to work with big numbers, where one didn’t consider to be a number and was equal to 0 but when you multiply by 0 everything is 0 .
    Was mind blowing at the time .

    • @MartinaStella-
      @MartinaStella- 24 дні тому +1

      Haha I remember, I was lost 1*1

    • @johnplaysgames3120
      @johnplaysgames3120 24 дні тому +38

      What a lot of people misunderstand about multiplication (either when they were a child or still, as adults, in a whole lot of the comments here) is the question that multiplication is answering. Because of its similarity to the way we use the word "multiply" outside of math -- like, "to make more" -- people think of mathematical multiplying like "cloning." They think "I have 1 apple and I clone it 1 time, now I have 2 apples." But, really, the question multiplication is answering is "How many instances of apple do you have right now?" If you're holding 1 apple, the answer to that question is 1. You have 1 apple, one time. 1x1. If you have 2 apples, you have 1 apple two times. 1x2. Etc.
      Terrence and the other folks arguing that 1x1=2 are misunderstanding the definition of the word "multiply" and are confusing it with a non-math phrase like "be fruitful and multiply." That's why they keep treating 1x1 as if it's saying 1+1. It's not.

    • @patinho5589
      @patinho5589 24 дні тому +4

      Multiplication is just adding lots of times.

    • @patinho5589
      @patinho5589 24 дні тому +8

      @@johnplaysgames3120yes. They are full of nonsense. I can’t believe this is getting traction.

    • @ophiochus5079
      @ophiochus5079 24 дні тому

      If you want to get your brain blown off completely do the following: give each vowel like AEIOUY a 1, and all other letters a 0, boiling each word down to binary like for example: Hi my name is = 01 01 0101 01, now apply multiplication of each number 🤓 as in binary 1=yes/light on/truth/fact and 0=no/light off/lie/fiction - now guess what the output of each word is, what the output of each sentence is, what tve output of each text, book, "law" is 😂 this disqualifies all laws, all contracts, all religions, basically the whole world 😉 have fun trying it for yourself ✌🏼🤓 yours truly a beeing recognised it's godlyness helping others do so 😊

  • @AyKuTRyu
    @AyKuTRyu 21 день тому +65

    If one is unaware of an unpleasant fact or situation one cannot be troubled by it.
    Ignorance is bliss.

    • @Rick_SanchezZZZ
      @Rick_SanchezZZZ 19 днів тому +6

      Nah... More like quantum mechanics...
      Nothing is EVERYTHING simultaneously and is not.
      Depending on the observing party.
      Don't ever trade your awareness for anything else.
      Ignorance is stupidity and blindness and deafness and muteness and most of all WEAKNESS!
      IF YOU'RE STRONG, YOU CHANGE IT instead of ignoring it.
      Change begins within.
      In your mind.
      Don't waste or trade your mind for ignorance, yuqqqq...

    • @AyKuTRyu
      @AyKuTRyu 19 днів тому +2

      @@Rick_SanchezZZZ Bro that was a message for the ignorant fellas.😊

    • @bildfluss
      @bildfluss 19 днів тому +3

      @@AyKuTRyuthanks god we now have UA-cam ScIeNcE as in alternative to BELIVE in so no one has to accept real science anymore. And we losers can fell smart and can call the normal people ignorant. I really love this timeline ❤

    • @AyKuTRyu
      @AyKuTRyu 19 днів тому

      @@bildfluss Actually it is not UA-cam science. The thing is, we live in a time where we have very quick access to any information that we need. Just type anything into Google, you'll get your answer. Easy cheesy but back in the days it was very difficult, so you had to read books most of the time and study for yourself. People who are older than the Z Generation, they had the advantage to experience things the way the kids from today don't.

    • @Sourceality
      @Sourceality 18 днів тому

      Ignorance is sufforing 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂🎉🎉🎉🎉😂

  • @bebuchoo
    @bebuchoo 12 днів тому +1

    Sorry, but the equation at 5:36 is simply incorrect. x^3 = 2X applies here because the number X is √2, and 2 = (√2)^2 so the equation says literally (√2)^3 = (√2)^2 * (√2) which is basically saying 1 = 1 . The overall equation he is implying is x * (√x) = (√x)^3 which is also equivalent of 1 = 1

  • @catinayahimperatrice8737
    @catinayahimperatrice8737 18 днів тому

    He is right:
    1x1= 2. Like 1 and 1 equals 2.
    2x2 = 4. Like 2 and 2 equals 4.
    Ppl are now saying that Terrence 1x1= 2 is an addition. In his case, 1x1=2 is a multiplication which gives the same result as the addition. What they refuse to admit is that accepting 1x1=1 is a multiplication, which also give the same result than a division. Who came up with this logic in the first place? And why can't it be corrected?
    If you can divide it, you can multiply it = what Terrence said.
    3x3 is 9. Like 3 and 3 and 3 equals 9 but 3 plus 3 equals 6.
    Multiplication of a single number vs. multiplication of several numbers does not always add up. That is why multiplication with certain numbers is not addition, even if it gives the same results as an addition

  • @H8TDGAMING
    @H8TDGAMING 24 дні тому +36

    Here is an easy way to understand 1x1=1
    5x5=25 or 5+5+5+5+5=25
    Now do the same with 1
    1x1=1 or 1=1
    There is nothing to multiply.
    5x5=25 because there are five 5s
    1×1=1 because there is only one 1
    Hope that helps

    • @jtsjtsm7920
      @jtsjtsm7920 24 дні тому

      Exactly!

    • @ragetotheend
      @ragetotheend 24 дні тому +3

      Not really. Ppl will just add your 1x1=1 as a 1+1=2. The real way to think about it is like a pack of beer. If you have 4x3=12 you can understand that 1x1=1. 1beer and not 2. I dont even drink. 😅

    • @H8TDGAMING
      @H8TDGAMING 24 дні тому +3

      @@ragetotheend Could have had me fooled by the way you constructed your reply.

    • @ragetotheend
      @ragetotheend 24 дні тому +2

      @@H8TDGAMING bottom line that man is nuts.

    • @mrscorp2011
      @mrscorp2011 22 дні тому +2

      This is the simplified explanation to counter Terrence than those explained too long on their comments.

  • @outshine5411
    @outshine5411 22 дні тому +31

    There’s people out there who are so desperate to believe that their mundane reality is more interesting then it is, they will believe anything

    • @edzbienen
      @edzbienen 20 днів тому +4

      Exactly ! Just look real quick at the other videos of this channel to understand we are in a very weird "new age" trip here
      "free your vibrations", "regenerate your body", "the third eye" all these shits, like come on...

    • @fu_games
      @fu_games 20 днів тому

      thats why i enjoy watching fantasy movies.

    • @dictionplacement5467
      @dictionplacement5467 20 днів тому +1

      People get so locked up because life is so boring, just like the reasons stone age and egypt times people made up stories of gods and strange things they wanted to believe

    • @Arkstromater
      @Arkstromater 20 днів тому

      ​​@@dictionplacement5467knowledge....our curse...and our gift

    • @blazayblazay8888
      @blazayblazay8888 20 днів тому +1

      SOMETHING CULT LEADERS KNOW ALL TOO WELL

  • @user-zg2gv7lm1i
    @user-zg2gv7lm1i 19 днів тому

    On the 1x1 statement. I think Terrence should be asking for a different terminology for "multiplication" instead of revamping all of mathematics. Just for a second let's not look the equation 1x1=B as multiplying, but look at (x) as a symbol to show how many times the number 1 is being used.
    EXAMPLE:
    If you use the number 1 one time, you have 1 - (1 times 1=1) or (1x1=1)
    If you use the number 1 two times, you have 2 - (1 times 2=2) or (1x2=2)
    If you use the number 1 three times, you have 3 - (1 times 3=3) or (1x3=3)
    If you use the number 1 no times at all, you have nothing - (1 times 0=0) or (1x0=0)
    I am and old guy and when we learned multiplication tables in school we memorized them like this: 1 TIMES 1 equals 1, 1 TIMES 2 equals 2 and so on. I guess the word multiply is throwing you off unnecessarily.

  • @FirstSuiGeneris
    @FirstSuiGeneris 25 днів тому +53

    Terrence Howard is correct! He has come to the same conclusion I came to decades ago! His spirit is guiding his mind and soul! Truth is the truth!

    • @yatatusimu2498
      @yatatusimu2498 24 дні тому

      Ridicule is the first weapon of the unwittingly ignorant -This is exactly where Terrence Howard just completely puts Maths & Physics academicians to the side and in the shade so to speak - all the while winning public sentiment in the process - he has a nack for "think-speak" speaking out loud, without missing a beat, regarding what we all think and have wondered one time or another - and he proceeds, in quick time to, consciesly highlight glaring fundamental conundrums and eloquently exposes the prime anomaly - more in reflex rather than sound retort, academicians take umbridge to this, and whilst attempting to take an effective cerebral "sledge hammer" to it all, actually prove themselves affronted rather than illuminated and revert to the defacto intellectual reflex of taking a simplified and irreducible conundrum and making it appear as it was prior & in twice the time: (complex and esoteric) - Well done Terrence.

    • @mrmagoo9249
      @mrmagoo9249 16 днів тому +1

      So because he came to an equally stupid conclusion to you, of which you haven’t said anything about, automatically means he’s correct
      Because… he can’t do 1 x 1…
      That’s not exactly a great start is it…
      His mind is guiding him to bullshit

  • @elaineremains
    @elaineremains Місяць тому +75

    that math example where you showed 4/2 is the same as 2*2=4 and the extrapolated that to 2/1 is the same as 1*1=2 well that's wrong, coz 2/1=2 as far as i know and that means the 'same' equation isn't 1*1=2 it's 1*2=2 so that whole basic premise is wrong, and him saying that 1*1 doesn't make anything bigger, then what about multiplying by half, it makes it smaller, but it's still multiplication... i think math is off too, i put it in my novel lol but those examples aren't good

    • @berthavegagalicia1276
      @berthavegagalicia1276 Місяць тому +17

      Thanks!
      It’s not difficult to realice that Terrance doesn’t know anything about basic math.
      Does he even know what is a multiplication?
      He needs to return to elementary school

    • @elaineremains
      @elaineremains Місяць тому +4

      @@berthavegagalicia1276 i'm not sure what's going on with him, this is the first video i have seen about this business... i was just questioning the basics.. we have to admit that the square root of 2 looks weird lol and he's right about the hypotenuse being wrong if the two sides of a right angle triangle are one in length, if indeed one squared + one squared = hypotenuse squared....

    • @sam5694
      @sam5694 27 днів тому +12

      ​@@berthavegagalicia1276 or maybe you need to remove the elementary programming out of you!

    • @berthavegagalicia1276
      @berthavegagalicia1276 27 днів тому +7

      @@sam5694 basic programming is just basic math and logic rules. Why do you think is the reason that internet could exist?

    • @zivley
      @zivley 25 днів тому +8

      @@berthavegagalicia1276 he apparently doesn't know what multiplication is, because he's claiming it means "making more"...
      Yeah, when you multiply your income you're making more money, but it's not always the case...
      He has some valid points, but the problem is that when someone is saying something, which can be a very strong truth, but it's basing himself in weak and wrong claims, it looses credibility...
      I do believe everything in math is bullshit, and don't give me that shit about "thanks to math you're writing this comment in a computer over the internet", because then you're implying that humanity has got necessarily better, which I disagree.
      The whole nature goes by perfectly without knowing nor applying all those math and physics laws.
      An eagle doesn't need Newton's discovery of gravity to know how to fly and defy it, a duck never went "eureka" when he simply sits and floats in the lake, he doesn't care his body causes an upforce that is equal to the volume of liquid his body displaced...
      All those "universal laws" were simply ways we have to explain what doesn't need to be explained for it to exist. It's simply because our ego and limited mind can't simply enjoy the ride on this planet without having to measure and explain every frigging thing. But of course, once you invent all those measuring and this silly game of playing with numbers, of course everything turns to be "science, which is based on facts that were empirically proven".
      Of course you can prove it! You're using the very tools you invented to prove it!
      Why wouldn't a hawk try to pray on a goat?
      Because he won't be able to lift it, too big, too heavy. how does they know that? They don't need scales and weights calculations, they just know, because it's programmed inside their DNA after millions of years of evolution.
      So, who needs math? Only we do, just because we can't simply live without explaining every thing.

  • @pamlemm903
    @pamlemm903 17 днів тому

    Wow this is epic. I've always wondered where spin comes from, i noticed it's vital importance to all of molecular chemistry when i studied it. I'm very impressed to hear this new theory. Thalys for sharing! Where is the rest of it?

  • @MsIndigo74
    @MsIndigo74 19 днів тому +10

    Many seasons ago, I was in an A’Level mathematics class and we were doing proofs (mathematical proofs)
    The teacher was a 70 year old American maths genius who could calculate logs, antlogs, cos, sin , tan and theta values by mental work without use of a log book.
    Anyway, one day a girl in class proved that 1=2
    Going by standards mathematical assumption to derive and solve equations.
    I remember that class mate kept insisting that there was something wrong with mathematical rules. Some were wrong but were universally taught to every body.

    • @southernafricanboy4148
      @southernafricanboy4148 17 днів тому

      Don't understand what you trying to explain. Read it again
      Then again you are a mathematics person and you guys nobody understands anything you say😂

  • @coalblooded303
    @coalblooded303 Місяць тому +91

    Finally someone proves its all just frequency and vibration.

    • @junkman7901
      @junkman7901 Місяць тому +16

      He didn’t prove anything

    • @MrNiceHk
      @MrNiceHk Місяць тому +10

      This is known in secret societies since the dawn of time

    • @Woodman.420
      @Woodman.420 Місяць тому +1

      Buddhists said it tausend years ago too

    • @coalblooded303
      @coalblooded303 Місяць тому +7

      @@Woodman.420 yeah. Meant someone in this century. Tesla said it too. But that, was the last century. We're all meant to be spiritual beings, not religious people.

    • @ShifuCareaga
      @ShifuCareaga 29 днів тому +1

      Lmao. Sheeple everywhere.

  • @lenaonmealways4193
    @lenaonmealways4193 Місяць тому +99

    Thank you Terrance! The truth of our existence, our matrix is all coming to the surface. I am open to learning and going forward with the evidence.

    • @dorissetto4343
      @dorissetto4343 Місяць тому +2

      YES YES YES!

    • @christinegreig8826
      @christinegreig8826 Місяць тому +2

      Meaning????????

    • @4LadyK
      @4LadyK Місяць тому +5

      *God is real, Jesus is real, heaven is real.
      Also, God is pure love energy, and we are connected to God and everything and everyone. And by everything, I mean everything!!! Every living thing! Have I mentioned that everything is alive? :) including our planet?
      We choose to come here, we choose what we look like, who our family is, we choose what we want to learn and under what circumstances. We choose where we’re going to live, etc..
      This is the dream, When we die, only our bodies expire, we don’t skip a beat, we are immediately out of the body as a soul. And then we go home. Happily. :)
      That seems to be the gist of it. But I would love for God to allow us to remember more.
      Enjoy your journey to enlightenment . It’s a wild ride.

    • @isaacjacobs3785
      @isaacjacobs3785 27 днів тому +1

      @@4LadyK Nope but its your life you are wasting.

    • @isaacjacobs3785
      @isaacjacobs3785 27 днів тому

      @@4LadyK and wtf is God got to do with math hahahahahahaha. God just wants to punish the innocent, like babies and children. If you want to go there, I'll throw nothing but facts at you about it. Such a weak mind!!!

  • @RandallAcquistapace-my4tr
    @RandallAcquistapace-my4tr 15 днів тому

    If you look at the circular version of the Flower. Each flower represents its own gravitational force. Each Galaxy spins on it own energy plain. Draw a line from each flower in they will actually create a ball. This ball could be a model of black holes. Yes, there is black mater as it bends all matter, down to waves.

  • @dominiccocchiola6922
    @dominiccocchiola6922 2 дні тому

    Its schrodinger's cat. We observed the limitations which guide our further limited observations. We ask the the highest quality question and the truth/god/paranormal data sort of disturbingly mutters back , "I am and you only see me as you are able"

  • @susanharrer4024
    @susanharrer4024 Місяць тому +79

    I love that he is brave to shake our minds & make us think!

    • @vincentmcbride6210
      @vincentmcbride6210 26 днів тому +4

      He's not brave he's insane lol

    • @martinmikkelsen-yd8sn
      @martinmikkelsen-yd8sn 25 днів тому +2

      @@vincentmcbride6210 if normality is running around driving other people crazy then insane seem like something you want to be...

    • @xydny0437
      @xydny0437 24 дні тому +1

      ​@@vincentmcbride6210 says a mortal being 😂

    • @vincentmcbride6210
      @vincentmcbride6210 24 дні тому +1

      @@xydny0437 I know i shouldn't talk about a God like terence howard he's on a another level.

    • @mrmagoo9249
      @mrmagoo9249 16 днів тому

      You’re not thinking

  • @montel20000
    @montel20000 27 днів тому +40

    Let's break down the nuances of multiplication and how the case of 1 x 1 fits into the broader concept:
    Multiplication as Repeated Addition:
    In its most basic form, multiplication is understood as repeated addition. For example, 3 x 4 means adding 3 four times (3 + 3 + 3 + 3 = 12).
    Multiplication as Scaling:
    Multiplication can also be seen as scaling or changing the size of a quantity. Multiplying by 2 doubles something, multiplying by 0.5 halves it, and so on.
    The Identity Property of 1:
    The number 1 has a special property called the multiplicative identity. This means any number multiplied by 1 remains unchanged.
    This aligns with both the repeated addition and scaling concepts:
    Adding a number to itself once doesn't increase the quantity.
    Scaling a quantity by a factor of 1 keeps its size the same.
    Why 1 x 1 = 1 is Essential:
    Upholding the identity property of 1 is crucial for consistency within the entire system of mathematics.
    Many advanced mathematical concepts and calculations rely on this fundamental rule.
    Multiplication is More Than "Making More":
    While multiplication often results in a larger number, its essence is about the relationship between quantities. In the case of 1 x 1, the relationship is one of sameness.
    It's completely understandable that the result of 1 x 1 might seem counterintuitive at first glance. This is why exploring the different interpretations of multiplication - repeated addition, scaling, and the importance of the identity property - leads to a richer understanding of this fundamental operation.

    • @FenrirHdz38328
      @FenrirHdz38328 25 днів тому +5

      Can you explain it again? Please.

    • @reubroper1427
      @reubroper1427 25 днів тому

      @@FenrirHdz38328

    • @Phazz88
      @Phazz88 25 днів тому +6

      Ppl are confused by elementary school maths and bro just casually introduces field axioms. Bold move!

    • @reubroper1427
      @reubroper1427 24 дні тому

      @@Phazz88

    • @oliverrafelsberger5554
      @oliverrafelsberger5554 24 дні тому +1

      @@FenrirHdz38328 Maybe you can just READ it again?

  • @spoonthumb
    @spoonthumb 5 днів тому

    The idea of 1x1=2 would be better explained by using the word 'multiply' which means to increase in number. So 1 multiplied by 1 is 2. To multiply 1 by 1 is 2, to multiply 2 by 1 is 3.

  • @rianariana446
    @rianariana446 23 дні тому +55

    I respect Terrence Howard for speaking out 🎉🎉🎉 we need more brave people like Terence!!!

    • @nelg3334
      @nelg3334 22 дні тому +4

      This is info is useless info as it’s nothing new just regurgitated bs all over again

    • @adams.555
      @adams.555 20 днів тому

      Look at MAGA people; they are brave but do we really need them ?

    • @mrmagoo9249
      @mrmagoo9249 16 днів тому

      Speaking out against what?

  • @wadecoppage5583
    @wadecoppage5583 20 днів тому +54

    4:10 I'm just getting started, but one thing about addition and multiplication is they are related but not exactly connected. There's a reason we say 'times' because it's literally. 2x2 is 2 2 times, so 1x1 is 1 1 time, which is 1. To say 1x1 should be 2 doesn't work with the basics of multiplication.

    • @soapenvelope
      @soapenvelope 18 днів тому

      Yes. And 1x0=0 because it is one at zero times. And zero is useless math, like we never wrote it

    • @SpacePonder
      @SpacePonder 18 днів тому +4

      If 1x1=1 then how come 2x2=4. It should be 2.

    • @yami4g63
      @yami4g63 18 днів тому

      if you stay within the lie then sure.

    • @yami4g63
      @yami4g63 18 днів тому

      @@soapenvelope you have something and add nothing too it.... now magically have nothing again......seems legit.

    • @BrianTemple-lx6mt
      @BrianTemple-lx6mt 17 днів тому

      But your reasoning is based on the only thing we’ve known or been taught until Terrence shed light on this fallacy.

  • @bradrichardsoniii1895
    @bradrichardsoniii1895 10 днів тому

    I'm telling you. You can feel the energy around you. Try putting your hand apart about 2 feet. Now slowly push your hands together very very slowly you will slowly start feeling the energy almost like a jello type orb. When they get closer you will start feeling the energy pulling in around you and it will start pulling your hands together. It is amazing.

    • @bradrichardsoniii1895
      @bradrichardsoniii1895 10 днів тому

      You have to concentrate and I guarantee you can feel it with practice.

  • @kendrasmith8176
    @kendrasmith8176 3 дні тому

    So refreshing to hear how smart he is. I believe that our science is exactly the same. Outdated thinking. Taught to our kids and we know it’s wrong but they don’t want to rewrite the books. We need to disrupt this system so many people are programmed and just follow like sheep. I commend this guy.

  • @afrochica05
    @afrochica05 Місяць тому +77

    Did anyone catch Terence say , " what I was instructed to do" 🤔 Who instructed him? Most of these concepts come through in dreams. Interesting.

    • @Ttyronebigumms
      @Ttyronebigumms 29 днів тому

      Wym??

    • @cardoggcr
      @cardoggcr 29 днів тому +9

      I did, think he was referring to God.

    • @mssavedin92
      @mssavedin92 28 днів тому +9

      I heard him say that. Dreams, downloads coming from someplace else.

    • @coxmanbgg
      @coxmanbgg 25 днів тому +2

      @@cardoggcr and what is god exactly? Where do our thoughts come from? What is holding the planets and all things "in place" (what is the matter surrounding everything)? Isn't that the same?

    • @russcooke5671
      @russcooke5671 25 днів тому +4

      From the Akashic wavelength. Look it up. Fascinating

  • @user-ql7og2km2p
    @user-ql7og2km2p Місяць тому +13

    I think it's really amazing Terrence is talking about this, it's just a shame I have no idea what he is talking about. Is it something that can help fix my car?

    • @adetounafolabi6436
      @adetounafolabi6436 25 днів тому +1

      I think so, it may actually fix your car😂😂😂😂 lol

    • @user-ql7og2km2p
      @user-ql7og2km2p 25 днів тому

      @@adetounafolabi6436 Great! now I can apply this theory to age reversal and time travel... I think I've finally worked it out!!

    • @clevertaco306
      @clevertaco306 21 день тому

      😂

  • @westpittsburgca110
    @westpittsburgca110 15 годин тому

    If he was wrong we wouldn’t think he’s in danger! That says a lot about truth.

  • @thecymaticist
    @thecymaticist 14 днів тому +2

    He is carrying on the work of Walter Russell, Unfortunately the world is still not ready for it.

  • @palacespot2
    @palacespot2 Місяць тому +52

    Sometimes the cost is your life especially if it affects their money and power train

    • @DrifterSpirit9
      @DrifterSpirit9 Місяць тому +3

      Can you please explaine how this theory affects"their money" and the "power train"?Its a genuine question

    • @reubroper1427
      @reubroper1427 25 днів тому

      @@DrifterSpirit9 that's the bit that gets me, yeah I understand people getting sucked in but the worrying about his life bit is hilarious, lets "pretend" his theory is correct, who would care in the slightest?

    • @tggchat
      @tggchat 14 днів тому

      Because occultist thoughts are hidden

    • @reubroper1427
      @reubroper1427 8 днів тому

      @@tggchat could you elaborate on how that comment has any connection to the subject? please don't hide your thoughts

  • @Commandovah
    @Commandovah 24 дні тому +11

    Square root of 2 can be written as 2^(0.5)
    Case 1: Multiplying the square root by 2 = 2^(0.5) x 2 = 2^(0.5 + 1) = 2^(1.5). By the product rule of exponents.
    Case 2: Cubing the square root = (2^0.5)^3 = 2^(0.5 x 3) = 2^(1.5).
    By the power rule of exponents.
    Case 1 = Case 2.
    Hence Proved.
    This is basic.

    • @abenezerfetsum3632
      @abenezerfetsum3632 24 дні тому +2

      Thank you, dude finally someone with some sense. it is crazy what social media is doing nowadays. First, it was political misinformation, then religious now people are attacking the foundations of math and Science. What the heck is happening?

    • @johncaccioppo1142
      @johncaccioppo1142 21 день тому

      @@abenezerfetsum3632 Fascism depends on intellectual collapse. We are being herded into a machine... I don't think it will end well.

  • @dreamcatforgotten8435
    @dreamcatforgotten8435 13 днів тому

    Something is odd about Terrance's argument about the 'two separate operations' in regards to sqrt(2)*2 vs sqrt(2)^3
    Because sqrt(2)^3 is the same as sqrt(2)*(sqrt(2)^2) and (sqrt(2)^2 would just be 2)...
    So they aren't different operations, really... it's just a coincidence that it happened that way.
    His equation comparison would have been more fair if it was (x^0.5)^3 = x*(x^0.5)
    Still, its interesting to see that the individual is trying to think differently about the current fundamentals of Math and Science to see if we can reach a different conclusion about things.
    I'm not very learned when it comes to Chemicals or Geometrics, so that part of the video stood out to me.

  • @P-39_Airacobra
    @P-39_Airacobra 15 днів тому +1

    If you think of multiplication as a certain number of additions to zero (recursive addition), then his argument sort of falls apart. But he has a point: we rarely care to define such things, and this leads us into a metaphysical laziness.

  • @sydanaguacielos
    @sydanaguacielos Місяць тому +79

    I remember questioning 1x1 in school and I also remember being told that’s how it works, just memorize it.🤷

    • @harleysmith1857
      @harleysmith1857 28 днів тому +11

      Yes So many things just didn't seem right; so, I zoned out! Science class too
      ...teachers would explain 'how science works (for example atoms cells, evolution, & symbols) I would massively question it(vecause I saw it differently deeper amd multiple layers) and they never could really understand the depths of what I meant my explain it other than repetition! I thought I was dumb! Ihad no idea but I was on a whole other plain of understanding. I Grew up and had an awakening, saw scientific truth, I left church and everyday seek truth!

    • @ADK_7
      @ADK_7 28 днів тому +8

      ​@@harleysmith1857I think your teacher just wants you to understand those concepts just for the exam and to pass
      And even he doesn't understand that on a deeper level 😂
      Keep manifesting in life 👍🏻

    • @arturzathas499
      @arturzathas499 27 днів тому +18

      1 of 1 is 1

    • @Grevlor
      @Grevlor 27 днів тому +8

      He lists associaticity and commutativity as one thing, and describes something else entirely. He claims that our usual arithmetic operations don't work then uses them in a direct "proof", not one which seeks to establish a contradiction

    • @trinitrotolueneRBLX
      @trinitrotolueneRBLX 27 днів тому

      @@arturzathas499 I had high thoughts of Terrence but now I think he’s on coke
      the whole video, this man hasn’t shown us a written-out proof because every proof has assumptions (postulates) and when he says all our assumptions are wrong, he has nothing to work with other than his computer app. No doubt the OpenGL engineers or whatever his app was based on assumed 1 of 1 is 1 in order for things to function

  • @ciscosoto1
    @ciscosoto1 22 дні тому +78

    It's frustrating not able to understand what this is all about.... feel helpless not having the capacity to learn something's no matter how many times I read or listen.
    My hard reality is not all minds are created equal. Keep sharing knowledge.

    • @bobbucks
      @bobbucks 22 дні тому +19

      Thats the point of this. Its gobbtygook. Its abstract enough for uneducated people to feel like they're close to a grand realization. Everything Terrance described is very understood by plenty of people.

    • @fivestar2227
      @fivestar2227 22 дні тому +5

      The part I can relate to is the chemistry about using different pressures, temperatures and molecular mixtures to alter molecules. Almost like this is the reason that all chemistry is the way it is or something. I just dont see how we can utilize such revelations to veer off the path the elite puppet masters prefer us to be on. We can see from a new angle now but how can we put this new way of thinking to use?

    • @user-fu9gk8zd8r
      @user-fu9gk8zd8r 22 дні тому +10

      Dont worry. I studied physics and ik dont understand. They make it sound like logic, but they mix up things all other time, like atoms and molecules. This is nice stuff for some cult, but for anything useful to come of it it needs a lot of work

    • @jeffk7290
      @jeffk7290 22 дні тому

      One has to acquire knowledge first in order to understand what is in front of him. Otherwise one is subject to understanding anything and distinguishing nothing.One has to acquire knowledge first in order to understand what is in front of him. Otherwise one is subject to understanding anything and distinguishing nothing.

    • @sicast916
      @sicast916 22 дні тому +1

      You are smart enough, look into basics. Look up spiritual geometry.

  • @Josh-nw3wd
    @Josh-nw3wd 19 днів тому

    Before for I've seen any of these concepts or any of Howard's lectures. I have been come up with a lot of these same concepts of this wisdom thats within all of us. All knowledge is already within just tap in to it. Im still working on it and bealbe to do it at will. But for now the upgrade come unexpectedly

  • @will1631
    @will1631 13 днів тому

    I'm glad you slowed it down and extrapolated on it

  • @LostSoulSearching
    @LostSoulSearching 24 дні тому +35

    When I was stationed in Japan, I was with the MPs. While going to school, I began studying quantum physics... they ridiculed, mocked, and belittled me.
    Guess who later attended the University of Carlos III Madrid working on a space engineering degree.
    Guess all of those men put more into drinking rather than understanding, learning, and a future of more.

    • @VipersNest
      @VipersNest 23 дні тому +5

      Who later attended the University of Carlos III Madrid to work on a space engineering program?

  • @BatkoNashBandera774
    @BatkoNashBandera774 24 дні тому +25

    One of the greatest gifts of Terrence's book is that as I'm reading it, my mind's eye is narrating in his voice.

  • @hirokomlm131
    @hirokomlm131 19 днів тому

    It's possible for things to happen only once, and there needs to be a way to describe things that only happen once. There are two ways of saying this: 1) "Thing" or 2) "Thing times 1".
    You can substitute "thing" with any number, multiply it by 1, and you will still have that one thing. What Terrence is trying to say is is that multiplying by one is a unique oxymoron because it actually means "do not multiply, leave the thing as it is."

  • @Lopez94993
    @Lopez94993 12 днів тому +1

    This makes more sense too me, than drawing lines on a graph with letters.